French shipping group CMA CGM reports it has closed the first stage in its planned acquisition of Santos Brasil, a multi-terminal operator in Brazil including the Port of Santos. CMA CGM announced in September 2024 its intention to acquire the company first buying shares from an institutional fund manager and then launching a tender offer for the remaining shares.

The acquisition comes as South America and specifically Brazil continues to draw investments from the major shipping companies. CMA CGM will be investing in excess of $2 billion to expand its operations in Brazil. MSC and Maersk have also announced expansions for their operations in Brazil as well as DP World.

CMA CGM reports it closed the acquisition of approximately 48 percent of the shares in Santos Brasil from funds managed by Opportunity, one of the largest asset managers in Brazil for a reported value of approximately $1.1 billion. Combined with a three percent position held by an affiliate of CMA CGM, the company now controls 51 percent of Santos Brasil.

A second stage tender will be launched for the remaining shares once an independent appraisal is completed. 

Santos Brasil operates five terminals and a total of eight assets, including the largest container terminal in Brazil and South America. The Tecon Santos Terminal in Santos currently has a capacity of 2.5 million TEU and will be expanded to 3 million TEU. It can dock three 14,000 TEU vessels simultaneously.  According to CMA CGM, the terminal handles 40 percent of Brazil’s overall container volume. They also called it the most efficient terminal in the Port of Santos. 

The acquisition expands CMA CGM’s 20-year presence in Brazil and is keeping with the strategy to grow terminal operations and the logistics segments of the business. CMA CGM said it will support the development of Santos and the other ports and will integrate the operations with its group including CEVA Logistics.

The acquisition comes as Santos continues to report strong growth. The Port Authority reported March was the third consecutive month of increases and at 460,000 TEU was the busiest March on record. It said the positive performance resulted in an increase of nearly seven percent for the first quarter of 2025 or a total of 1.3 million TEU handed in the port.

The federal government has committed to investments in the Santos port complex. It will invest $2.2 million to improve access both by land and sea, including new roads and the deepening of the shipping channel.  

The Port of Santos is a key contributor to Brazil’s foreign trade accounting for nearly a third (30 percent) of the country’s trade flow in March. China is the main trading partner accounting for more than 28 percent of the volume in the port.  In addition to containers, Santos is a major port for soybeans and other agricultural commodities as well as gasoline and the fuel sector.

The on-again-off-again acquisition of the maritime business from Spire Global by Kpler closed on Friday, April 25, the agreed date in a settlement between the two sides, but not without a new wrinkle to the contentious combination. The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) confirmed it has opened an investigation into the proposed business combination requiring the companies to be independently operated.

Kpler confirmed in the closing announcement that it is working closely with the relevant regulatory authorities and in particular with the UK Competition and Markets Authority “in light of their review of the transaction.” Both sides had to enter into a compliance statement with CMA promising to operate the business units separately, not sharing technology or confidential business data. In addition to not moving forward with an integration, they committed to ensure that sufficient resources are made available for the development of both businesses, on the basis of their respective pre-merger business plans and maintain their current product offerings.

Despite the latest glitch, Kpler called the closing a “strategic move that bolsters Kpler's capabilities in maritime data and analytics.” Mark Cunningham, CEO of Kpler, said "The addition of this high-quality data will unlock greater value for our customers and partners by providing increasingly comprehensive and timely insights into global trade flows. It's about helping them navigate complexity, uncover opportunities, and make better decisions every day."

Spire reported the completion of the sale for approximately $233.5 million, before adjustments, plus a $7.5 million agreement for services over a twelve-month period, post-close. Spire reports it used the proceeds of the sale to retire all outstanding debt and that the remaining proceeds will be used to invest in near-term growth opportunities. It followed the terms first announced for the deal in November 2024.

Spire Global reported in February it had filed a lawsuit against Kpler for a failure to close the acquisition of its maritime group while also warning shareholders of potential debt problems if the deal is not completed. At the time, it said it believed all the conditions to closing contained in the purchase agreement had been satisfied, but that Kpler had not moved forward with the closing. Three weeks ago, Spire reported an agreement had been reached to resolve the litigation and mutually release claims, if the closing occurred by April 25.

In the CMA filing, it came out that Kpler had communicated with the regulator on February 25, March 11, March 12, March 24, March 31, and April 10, requesting that the CMA consent to derogations to the Initial Enforcement Order. CMA agreed on April 16 to permit Kpler to have a level of oversight of the acquired company while requiring that they be kept independent and Spire’s business continue as a going concern so as not to prejudice the investigation. CMA reports it is continuing to consider if the combination may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition in any market or markets in the United Kingdom.

Spire Maritime built its niche with real-time capabilities by designing, building, and deploying nanosatellites, each the size of a wine bottle, in a constant earth orbit collecting data from all the ships. Kpler said when the deal was announced it would expand its data reach, offering comprehensive visibility across open oceans. Management said the acquisition would further strengthen Kpler’s commitment to delivering superior real-time data and analytics to its clients, supporting informed, data-driven decision-making across the global supply chain.

Kpler in 2023 acquired MarineTraffic a portal for AIS data, mapping, and visualization along with FleetMon, a vessel database. Access to Spire Global’s proprietary satellites and analytics would enhance the portfolio.

Under the terms of the agreement, Spire Global retains its satellite network, technology, and infrastructure. It said it would focus its business on its customers in aviation, weather, and the space services sectors.
 

 

India is making a major statement in its quest to become a global cruise tourism destination with the inauguration of the country’s largest terminal at Mumbai Port. After eight years of construction and ?556 crores ($67 million) of investment, the Mumbai International Cruise Terminal (MICT) has started operations, a development expected to boost India’s determination to grow cruise tourism.

MICT has been in the works since 2018 and has faced a myriad of challenges, including funding and pandemic-instigated construction delays. The inauguration of the terminal is thus a significant milestone in efforts to attract leading cruise lines to India and drive the growth of cruise tourism. Currently, the cruise tourism market in India is valued at only $100 million, which is a mere one percent of the global market.

With the new terminal developed through a public-private partnership, India is upbeat about changing the narrative. MICT is the country’s largest cruise terminal spreading over an area of more than 415,000 square feet at Ballard Pier. The terminal is designed to handle over one million passengers annually, approximately 10,000 passengers per day. MICT can handle five cruise ships simultaneously, with an 11-meter (36-foot) draft and up to 300 meters (984 feet) in length.

The Mumbai Ports Authority (MbPA) reports it signed a 30-year concession with private firms Ballard Pier Port Private Limited and J M Baxi & Co to operate the terminal. Currently, only Cordelia Cruises operates from the new terminal, with its sole cruise ship, the Empress (48,500 gross tons) with a capacity of 1,840 passengers sailing twice-weekly. The line is in the process of expanding its fleet announcing an agreement with Norwegian Cruise Line to assume operations of two of its older ships in 2026 and 2027. India is also a stopover port for cruise ships transiting the region.

India’s Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal termed the inauguration of MICT as a major step in advancing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of transforming the country into a global cruise hub through state-of-the-art infrastructures. The vision encompasses tapping the potential of the country’s long coastline and vast inland waterways to build a booming international and domestic cruise tourism industry.  

In September last year, the Indian government launched the Cruise Bharat Mission to oversee the transformation of the cruise industry, setting ambitious targets that include the development of 10 international sea cruise terminals, the creation of 100 river cruise terminals, the launch of five marinas, and the integration of more than 5,000 km of waterways. The overall goal is to double cruise passenger traffic to over one million and 1.5 million river cruise passengers by 2029. This is expected to translate to the creation of over 400,000 direct and indirect jobs across the cruise value chain.

“Today, Mumbai, with its longstanding reputation as a major maritime hub in the world, commenced cruise operations from the Mumbai International Cruise Terminal, providing passengers with modern amenities for a better and safer experience,” said Sonowal.

While MICT incorporates sustainability amenities, Sonowal also inaugurated a shore power facility at Mumbai port as part of the green port initiative. Currently, however, only MbPA tugboats and Coast Guard vessels will be able to plug in before being expanded to include cruise ships in the future.
 

 

S&P Global agreed to acquire the Automatic Identification System (AIS) data services business of ORBCOMM in a move designed to strengthen its supply chain and maritime offerings. It points to the growing uncertainties in global supply chains saying the acquisition as well as a new equity position in ORBCOMM build on the complementary strengths to provide greater essential intelligence to customers.

ORBCOMM was one of the pioneers in AIS which S&P highlights is used today to track and monitor vessels, enhancing maritime visibility and delivering critical insights that support business intelligence and decision-making for government and commercial clients worldwide.

The standardized AIS system began to emerge in the 1990s and by the early 200s, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) was moving to mandate the use of AIS. It was first introduced for newbuilds and later required as retrofits to all ocean-going commercial vessels. 

Since 2004, ORBCOMM's AIS vessel tracking technology has incorporated high-quality, proprietary data with satellite and terrestrial-based coverage. Its AIS solutions are utilized for diverse applications such as supply chain visibility, maritime safety, surveillance and security, environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance, and more. 

"With the uncertainties surrounding global markets and supply chains, this strategic acquisition underscores our commitment to investing in differentiated data and solutions that can help our customers navigate the volatility," said Whit McGraw, Head of Risk & Valuations Services at S&P Global Market Intelligence. "ORBCOMM's AIS data services business offers cutting-edge technology and coverage that strengthens our energy transition and maritime supply chain offering, giving us ample opportunity to invest in new product innovations."

The financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed. ORBCOMM's AIS data services will be integrated within the S&P Global Market Intelligence division of S&P Global.  

S&P Global also announced it has entered into an agreement to take a strategic equity position in ORBCOMM. The two organizations report they will create a strategic alliance to develop a range of differentiated supply chain data and insight offerings.

In addition to the maritime applications, ORBCOMM offers services dedicated to the overland transport sector as well as heavy industry. The company also offers satellite connectivity services and it is used by government as well as sectors such as natural resources.

The companies said the acquisition, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close during 2025. 
 

 

The U.S. government is continuing its support to strengthen the capabilities of the Tunisian armed forces to enable them to respond effectively to a fragile security situation and a worsening immigrant crisis in the northern Africa region. According to U.S. officials in Tunisia for the commissioning of two former USCG cutters, these steps are reinforcing the enduring partnership between the two countries.

The two Island Class patrol boats, which had been part of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) fleet for years before they were decommissioned, were commissioned into at the naval base in La Goulette on April 17. They are expected to help the North African nation deal with growing security challenges including human trafficking, smuggling, organized crime, illegal immigration, and terrorism.

Now christened Tazarga and Menzel Bourguiba, the two 34-meter vessels were part of the 49-vessel Island class that was built between 1985 and 1992 for the U.S. Coast Guard. One of their key missions was in the war on drugs and later their mandates were extended to encompass the whole range of Coast Guard missions including search and rescue, fisheries enforcement, migrant, and military operations. The Island class ships, all of which were built at Bollinger's Lockport, Louisiana shipyard, are being replaced with Sentinel-class patrol boats.

Today, a majority of the boats have been retired from American service but most continue to serve in many allied foreign coast guards and navies. Among the recipients of the ships are Pakistan, Ukraine, Greece, Georgia, and Costa Rica.

 

 

The U.S. contends the donation of the two vessels to the Tunisian Navy is critical in strengthening Tunisia’s capacity to secure its maritime borders and advance regional security. Equipped with twin diesel engines that allow them to achieve speeds of up to 30 knots, the boats can operate over a range exceeding 3,000 nautical miles, a capability that is ideal for patrolling Tunisia’s vast coastline. Each vessel is armed with a 25mm Mk 38 machine gun and two .50 caliber machine guns and also features advanced radar and navigation systems.

The two vessels are the latest military assets that the U.S. has donated to Tunisia. In recent months, the U.S. has also donated four Textron C-208EX aircraft and six C-130 military aircraft to the Tunisian Air Force to support its intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Apart from military assets and equipment donations, Washington has also invested more than $1 billion in security cooperation with Tunisia since 2011.

The commissioning of Tazarga and Menzel Bourguiba into the Tunisia Navy fleet coincided with a scheduled port visit of the Blue Ridge-class command and control ship, USS Mount Whitney to the country as part of the U.S. commitment to regional stability.

“The visit is especially meaningful because it falls during the 220th anniversary of the 1805 Battle of Derna, when, through the support and cooperation of Tunisia, the U.S. military defeated maritime terrorism to make a more stable and secure region for commerce and economic development,” said Joey Hood, U.S. Ambassador to Tunisia.

Forward deployed to Gaeta, Italy, Mount Whitney, is part of the 6th Fleet area of operations that supports U.S. national security interests, security, and stability in Europe and Africa.
 

 

After two weeks, Estonian authorities are saying they continue to wait for word from the managers of a detained tanker that the issues leading to its detention have been resolved. The Kiwala (115,000 dwt) remains anchored in Muuga Bay and is being guarded by the Navy including with its flagship and patrol boats.

Estonian authorities with the Transportation Administration told the news outlet ERR that the Kiwala's captain and crew have been cooperating with the investigation. They are however waiting for confirmation from the oil tanker's representative that the ship's issues have been resolved.

Kristjan Truu, Director of the Maritime Department at the Transport Administration, had said when the ship was detained on April 11 that they were hopeful for a “swift resolution.” Speaking to ERR he said, "Once we have received confirmation, inspectors from the Transport Administration can go on board to carry out a follow-up inspection."

Over the past year, Estonia officials said there has been an increase in unknown insurance-covered vessel transits through the Gulf of Finland. These activities they assert pose a threat to Estonia’s critical infrastructure, safe navigation, and the marine environment. As such, they said they were acting under their rights and obligations as a port state when they stopped the vessel for an inspection.

Since June, the Transport Administration reports it has inspected the documents of 458 vessels. During these inspections, a variety of insurance documents were submitted to the authority. One forgery was identified, and additional documents suspected of being falsified were sent to the relevant flag states for verification. In cooperation with other authorities, the Transport Administration reports it had also conducted inspections of seven vessels in anchor areas.

What initially started as a routine check of documents however quickly escalated aboard Kiwala into the ongoing detention. The ship claimed to be registered in Djibouti, but in a check, they were told the flag had been withdrawn due to “illegal activities.” The tanker is sanctioned by the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Switzerland for previous illegal activities.

Inspectors spent the full day aboard the vessel on April 11 and carried out an extended inspection of the vessel. They identified several significant deficiencies that led the authorities to say the vessel could not be allowed the vessel to continue its voyage, as maritime and environmental safety cannot be guaranteed.

Out of the 40 deficiencies, 29 were significant and constituted the basis for detaining the vessel. The majority of these — 23 in total — were related to documentation, while the remaining deficiencies concerned the implementation of the ship’s safety management system, crew preparedness for various shipboard emergencies, and technical issues.

Until the authorities have been satisfied that all the issues have been corrected, Estonia will continue to detain the tanker. It was traveling in ballast inbound for Russia’s Ust-Luga terminal.

The European Commission announced yesterday that it was also moving to tighten restrictions on vessels transiting European waters. Even if the vessels are not making a port call, the EC resolution now requires the vessels to file proof of insurance. It is seen as a further crackdown targeting vessels such as the Kiwala operating as part of the shadow fleet servicing the Russian oil industry.

The Panhellenic Seaman’s Federation and other unions in Greece are demanding an investigation and better enforcement of safety regulations after a seafarer was killed as a ferry was unloading overnight in Patras. The unions called for a rally and 24-hour strike starting Friday, April 25, asserting that safety regulations are being repeatedly violated and ignored by the authorities.

The ferry AF Claudia (24,418 gross tons) docked at the port of Patras at 22:50 on Thursday, April 24, completing the approximately 32-hour run from Venice to Patras with a stop in Igoumenitsa. Built in 2001 and registered in Italy, the RoRo ferry can accommodate up to 950 passengers and has a 2,044 linear meter garage that can handle approximately 100 vehicles.

The ferry is owned by Italy’s Adria Ferries. It is operated under charter to Greece’s Attica Group. It is operating for the SuperFast Ferry brand.

According to the Hellenic Coast Guard, a truck was backing up on the vessel’s ramp when its trailer struck a 47-year-old female seafarer which Attica Group said was working on the vessel’s hotel department. She was fatally injured by the truck with the police reporting the driver has been detained. The ferry remained in Patras on Friday.

Attica Group issued a brief statement expressing condolences for the loss early on Friday morning of the crewmember. The Greek Maritime Accident Investigation Service (ELYDNA) reported it was sending a team to Patras to investigate the cause of the tragic incident.

Media reports are highlighting that the Patras Labour Center had earlier this month issued a warning of “grave risk” for the safety of crew and passengers as well as ships. They contend that safety is in danger during loading and unloading and as vessels arrive and depart ports. Reports assert there is a poor safety record for the ferries operating on the routes between Italy and Greece.

The unions called for a rally starting at 18:30 today, Friday, April 25, and for a 24-hour strike beginning at 19:00 today till Saturday, April 26 at 19:00. It comes as the summer tourist season begins in Greece.

A strike had previously been planned for May 1. The unions announced another rally planned for next Thursday preceding the start of that strike. The union was planning to use the May Day event to highlight working conditions in its ongoing protests. It also staged a one-day strike on April 9 as part of its demands for better wages and working conditions.

Greece’s Minister of Shipping and Island Policy Vassilis Kikilias wrote his condolences on social media. He said it was important to never forget that seafarers face danger every day at sea and their protection and safety must always come first.

[By: MED MARINE]

Starting the year with solid momentum, MED MARINE has signed five new tugboat contracts with operators in Italy, Greece, and Spain—strengthening its presence across Europe and underscoring its commitment to delivering high-performance solutions tailored to regional needs.

In January, MED MARINE signed a contract for a 24-meter DRAfter 2400 series tugboat to be delivered to Greece. The vessel will deliver a minimum bollard pull of 40 tons and is powered by a twin-screw conventional propulsion system—making it a reliable workhorse for harbour duties including towing, pushing, and mooring.

Spain is also on the roster, with a RAmparts 2300-W tug designed for versatile harbour operations. Compact at 23 meters, but delivering 50 tons of bollard pull, the tug will feature dual winches, an azimuth stern drive propulsion system, and a layout optimized for efficient multi-purpose operations. These new agreements reflect MED MARINE’s dedication to quality, trust, and long-term partnerships, while marking a dynamic start to 2025. With each new vessel, the company reaffirms its mission to deliver innovative solutions to ports around the world.

In February 2025, MED MARINE also secured an order for two RAmparts 2500-W and one RAstar 3200-W series tugboats to be delivered to Italy. Designed for versatility in harbour operations, the 25-meter RAmparts 2500-W tugs will offer 65 tons of bollard pull and feature an advanced azimuth stern drive propulsion system. The 32-meter RAstar 3200-W tug, on the other hand, is built for LNG terminal and escort duties. With an 80-ton bollard pull, dual winch capability, and LNG compatibility, this powerful unit will enhance safety and operational efficiency in demanding terminal environments.

These new contracts reflect MED MARINE’s dedication to quality, trust, and long-term partnerships, while marking a dynamic start to 2025. With each new vessel, the company reaffirms its mission to deliver innovative solutions to ports around the world.

[By: 

International industry leaders came together at AltaSea at the Port of Los Angeles on April 16th for the annual Protecting Blue Whales and Blue Skies (BWBS) Awards Ceremony, which recognized the top-performing shipping lines for the 2024 season and celebrated 10 seasons of the BWBS program. 

With thousands of shipping containers stacked high in the background, the Port of Los Angeles – the busiest container port in the Western Hemisphere – offered a fitting place to recognize shipping industry leaders who move cargo all over the globe for their exemplary efforts in the most impactful BWBS season yet. 

BWBS “Sapphire” rated lines – meaning their fleets transited 85% of the time at 10 knots or less in the vessel speed reduction (VSR) zones – each received a coveted whale tail sculpture for the highest performance. This year, each tail was handcrafted by shipwright Nate Slater from his woodshop. All the wood was sourced from remnants or drops from his career repairing wooden seiner and prohibition-era rum runner boats in the Pacific Northwest. Whale tail awardees were: CMA CGM; Connaught Shipmanagement HK; COSCO Shipping; CSL Americas; Hong Kong Top Honor Shipping; ISM Ship Management Ltd; Maersk; Marathon Petroleum; MSC; NYK Ro-Ro; Ocean Network Express; OOCL; OSG Ship Management, Inc.; Pilion Navigation; ConocoPhillips - Polar Tankers; Starbulk SA; STX Marine Service Co; Swire Shipping; Teo Shipping Corporation; Tomini Transports LLC; Toyofuji; Wallenius Wilhelmsen; and Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.

Ambassadors with 90% or more of eligible shipments with participating lines over the past year also received whale tail awards. They were: The Block Logistics, Who Gives A Crap, Eggboards, Nomad, and JAS Worldwide. Port of Hueneme was also recognized for the majority of ships calling on the port being enrolled with BWBS.

Gold award lines – meaning their fleets transited 60% - 84% of the time at 10 knots or less in the VSR zones – recognized were: Campbell Shipping Company, D'Amico Group; Dockendale; Empire Bulker Ltd.; Evergreen; Hapag-Lloyd; HMC Shipmanagement Co Ltd; Hyundai Glovis; K Line; Mol ACE; Pacific Basin Shipping Ltd.; Raffles Shipmanagement Services; Scorpio Group; Temm Maritime Co Ltd; Unisea Shipping Ltd; Venture Shipping Ltd; Veritas Shipmanagement and Wan Hai.

Shipping lines that volunteer to participate in the BWBS program reduce their speed along stretches of the California coast. In doing so, they help reduce the risk of fatal ship strikes on endangered whales, ocean noise, and air pollution and greenhouse gases. The program has dramatically advanced voluntary participation, research, and opportunities to protect both marine and human life in California’s coastal communities. Over the last 10 seasons, the environmental benefits brought by BWBS have only grown, and in recent years, the program has expanded to include company ambassadors that work with participating shipping lines and commit to helping promote responsible shipping. 

In honor of the program’s 10-year anniversary, special recognition was given across several categories. Evergreen, CMA CGM, and K-line were recognized for their leadership in sharing the most whale-sighting information with BWBS over time. MSC was honored for achieving the Sapphire Award tier over the last eight years, reducing its fleet’s speeds to 10 knots or less for the most distance of any participant: more than 168,000 nautical miles. 

Stanley Kwiaton, MSC’s Regional Manager of West Coast Port Operations reflected: “MSC’s values of collaboration, trust, and open communication have made our consistent success in this programme a reality. MSC is committed to protecting endangered whales and safeguarding the areas where they feed and migrate. We are very grateful to be an integral part of MSC’s worldwide efforts to protect these magnificent creatures. We look forward to continuing to work with the BWBS team and local partners by minimizing the way our operations impact whale habitats.”

It was clear from the large pod of whale tails on display and other lines' reflections, that commitment to environmental protection is a genuine value for so many shipping lines.

Neil Carraher, Country Manager, Swire Shipping: “Swire Shipping recognizes that responsible stewardship of biodiversity is important to maintaining a resilient marine environment, and we are conscious of the role that we can play to safeguard marine ecosystems in the areas where we operate. In the seven years since we joined BWBS, we are proud to have received the highest-tiered Sapphire Award for six consecutive years. It is very encouraging to see the positive impact the programme has had on biodiversity along the California coast, and we look forward to continuing our collaborative efforts within the industry.”

Antonia d’Amico, Group ESG Director, D’Amico: “For d’Amico Group, participating in BWBS for the second consecutive year and achieving the Gold rating is a true honor and a great success. This initiative reflects our unwavering commitment to the environment and underscores our responsibility to reduce the impact of our operations on marine ecosystems and air quality. Initiatives like BWBS highlight our industry’s dedication to continuous improvement, demonstrating that operational efficiency and environmental responsibility can go hand in hand.”

Jack Duesler, Regional Operations Manager, NYK Line: “We are excited and proud of the success of this program!  It continues to be a challenge but not one that is insurmountable.  Each year has its own difficulties but we are able to work as a team both internally and externally to ensure we achieve the prestigious Sapphire Rating.”  

James Jeng, Chief Marine Technology Officer, Yang Ming: “At Yang Ming, we recognize our responsibility to minimize environmental impact and promote sustainable shipping practices. That’s why we are proud to continue our participation in BWBS, an initiative that delivers both environmental and social benefits while helping to safeguard a stable and biodiverse future. This effort aligns with our Protecting Biodiversity and Zero Net Deforestation Commitment announced in 2024, further reinforcing our dedication to sustainability. We are taking meaningful action to preserve the beauty and biodiversity of our oceans for generations to come.”

The Awards Ceremony was supported by Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A., or MSC; CSL Americas; Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; NYK Line; The Block Logistics and Sonos. 

German renewable energy giant RWE is set to announce that it has stopped its offshore activities in the United States and setting higher requirements for future investments because of the “political developments.” The company follows TotalEnergies, Shell, and BP which previously announced they were backing away from projects in the U.S., and Equinor which last week said it is considering “legal remedies” after Trump’s Department of Energy suspending offshore work on a full-permitted wind farm off New York.

RWE released a manuscript of the speech Dr. Markus Krebber, CEO of RWE, will deliver next week, April 30, during the company’s annual meeting. In the speech, he will highlight the company’s many successes in 2024 and the progress being made on the Sofia wind farm for the UK and with the Danish wind farm Thor. He notes RWE has a combined offshore wind farm capacity currently of 3.3 GW and a further four projects with a capacity of 4.4 GW under construction.

Turning to the U.S. market environment, Krebber will tell shareholders, “We have stopped our offshore activities for the time being,” while the company has also introduced “higher requirements for future investments in the U.S.” He says despite the company’s success with onshore wind, solar energy, and battery storage, “Nevertheless, we remain cautious given the political developments.”

RWE became the largest leaseholder in the New York Bight with a potential 3-gigawatt area it won in the hotly contested 2022 offshore auction. At the end of the same year, RWE won a lease area to develop up to 1.6 GW off the coast of Northern California, which it projected would be one of the first commercial-scale floating wind farms in the country. It is also working with Greater New Orleans and GNOwind Alliance for regional opportunities. It launched site investigations off California in 2024 and proposed the Community Wind project with 1.3 GW of capacity to New York State.

The company in November 2024 warned it was delaying investments citing higher risks for offshore wind in the U.S. and a slower ramp-up of the European hydrogen economy. Krebber will tell shareholders next week the company has raised its threshold expectations for new investments. For future projects, he says they will increase the average return requirement from 8 percent to more than 8.5 percent.

For the U.S., he notes while the company surpassed 10 GW of generation capacity from renewable energy at the start of 2025, RWE will enforce higher requirements for future investments. This includes having all necessary federal permits in place, tax credits being safe harbored, and all relevant tariff risks mitigated. Only if these conditions are met for future investments, for the time being in onshore wind and solar, will it “be possible given the political environment.”

Developers of U.S. offshore wind projects remain concerned after the moves by the Trump administration including launching a review of the leasing process, pulling permits for projects in New York and New Jersey, and stopping funding on a research project in Maine. At the beginning of the month, four offshore projects were reported to be proposing to delay their state-level regulatory reviews. Shell reported in November 2024 that it would take a $1 billion charge as it moved away from U.S. offshore wind projects and Equinor said if a full-stop ensues for its Empire Wind project, it would have to repay $1.5 billion in financing and would be exposed to termination fees from its suppliers.
 

Ukraine’s Security Service and its State Board Service are reporting they have seized an unnamed cargo ship that they accursed of looting grain from Crimea. The action came as Ukraine continued to assert it would not cede the occupied region to Russia despite Donald Trump’s statements recognizing the area as Russian.

According to the announcement, Ukrainian forces detained the cargo ship in the “internal waters of the Black Sea area of Ukraine.” The SBU released pictures of its forces on the bridge of the vessel and documents it said it found during a search of the ship. They reported finding “physical evidence” during the search of the vessel and its navigational equipment that confirmed the “looting of Ukrainian agricultural products by the Russians.”

Ukraine is asserting the vessel loaded 5,000 tons of wheat in the port of Sevastopol in 2024, which it refers to as “temporarily occupied territory in southern Ukraine.” It further asserts the vessel was hiding its actions by “operating under the flag of one of the Asian countries.”

The vessel has now been officially arrested, and the crew placed in detention. Ukraine says the crew will be transferred for “procedural actions.”

 

Ukraine asserts it found physical evidence the ship transported wheat from Crimea in 2024 (SBU)

 

Ukraine has repeatedly accused the Russians of stealing grain and other materials during its occupation of ports and other areas in Ukraine and Crimea. Russia seized the Crimea peninsular in 2014. Last year, the open media source Bellingcat and Lloyd’s List published an exposé on the shipping of grain from Crimea.

Another vessel was seized in July 2024 by the Ukrainian authorities as the ship was sailing outbound on the Danube. It was alleged that the vessel had transported grain from Crimea in 2023 and again earlier in 2024. A Ukrainian court later awarded custody of the vessel to the state and ordered the captain and an officer detained for prosecution.

Today’s announcement followed statements by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that under his country’s constitution, he could not and would not cede Crimea to Russia. In the past, he has called Crimea a “red line” in the efforts to end the war with Russia. 

Trump is being quoted in an interview published on April 25 in Time Magazine as saying “Crimea will stay with Russia … Zelensky understands that.” Trump has been critical of Ukraine saying it is prolonging the war and creating impediments to the peace talks which he is anxious to conclude. 

Ukraine’s announcement of the seizure came as U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in an effort to move the peace talks forward.

[By: VPS]

Cashew Nut Shell Liquid - Background

As demand grows from all modes of transportation for low-to-zero carbon fuels, to support efforts in complying and achieving numerous environmental legislation leading to global decarbonisation, many alternative fuel sources are being considered. One of the most common and in demand sources of such fuels, is Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME), as either a 100% fuel-source, or as part of a bio-fossil blend. But with road transportation, aviation and shipping, all seeking to use FAME in their respective biofuels, demand is outweighing supply. Therefore, other bio-materials are being considered as alternatives to FAME.

One such material is Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL), which is the oil extracted from the shells of the cashew nut. This by-product of the cashew industry is a naturally occurring substituted phenol, which is abundantly available and a waste product, with a lower demand than FAME. The composition, properties and quality of CNSL depend upon the specific manufacturing production process used to extract the oil from the shell. These vary from, mechanical pressing to solvent extraction, vacuum pyrolysis, vacuum distillation or solvent extraction.

The industrial applications where CNSL is a key component are wide ranging and include, the production of polymers, plastics, resins, adhesives, surface coatings, insecticides, fungicides, anti-termite products and even pharmaceutical products.

There are three main components of CNSL, these are Cardanol, (also known as Ginkgol), Cardol and Anacardic Acid:

These substituted phenols tend to exhibit high acid number values (>3mgKOH/g). They also show high iodine values (>300gI2/100g), indicating an elevated level of unsaturation and hence increased degrees of reactivity and instability. Then also, high potassium levels leading to potential post-combustion deposits and corrosion of turbocharger nozzle rings.

As monomers, these chemicals are also prone to polymerisation at temperatures, >200ºC. As a consequence CNSL is potentially a highly reactive, very corrosive material.

However, the levels of acidity and reactivity can be reduced during the production and refining process by converting Cardol and Anacardic Acid to Cardanol. If the CNSL is >98% Cardanol, then the reactivity is significantly reduced.

VPS Testing of CNSL as a Biofuel

Over the past 3 years VPS have tested various CNSL compounds and fuel-blends to assess the potential of CNSL to be a viable biofuel.

Firstly, the use of CNSL blends can significantly reduce HC, CO/CO2 and smoke emissions, although they can raise NOx emissions slightly. However, VPS would advise never to use 100% CNSL as a fuel, as its far too reactive and corrosive. Further advice is to always check with the OEM regarding the compatibility of CNSL-based biodiesel blended products, with their machinery. Traditional marine fuels when blended with CNSL, may reduce the high acid number, reactivity and potassium levels of 100% CNSL, but also increase the energy content, sulphur content, cold-flow and sediment potential issues.

Fuel Combustion Analysis (FCA) of CNSL/Fossil Fuel Blends

In the recent past, VPS have tested CNSL products, blended with marine gas oil (MGO), very low sulphur fuel oils (VLSFO) and high sulphur fuel oils (HSFO). When undertaking fuel combustion analysis (FCA) of CNSL blended at varying percentages with MGO, VLSFO and HSFO, a wide range of results were produced in relation to, estimated cetane number, ignition delay and rate of heat release (ROHR), examples are given in the table below:

The CNSL blends with HSFO which undertook FCA, were particularly poor, with low Estimated Cetane Number (ECN), long Ignition Delay and low ROHR. CNSL blended with VLSFO gave better results, with acceptable ECN, shorter ignition delay and improved ROHR. Blending CNSL with MGO, gave better results than those obtained by HSFO/CNSL and VLSFO/CNSL blends.

Whether the blends were 80/20, 70/30 or 50/50 Fossil/CNSL, the blends using HSFO consistently gave the poorest FCA results. This may be due to a negative interaction between the asphaltenic content of the HSFO and the acidic nature of the CNSL.

Each of the CNSL blends gave poorer FCA results, when compared with the 100% fossil fuels, HSFO, VLSFO, MGO and 100% FAME.

Please note, to VPS knowledge, the above highlighted CNSL blends were not burnt onboard a vessel.

Burning CNSL/Fossil Blends

CNSL-blended fuels with MGO, VLSFO, or HSFO, have shown mixed reactions to vessel operations, where some CNSL-blends have been stored and burnt without issue, whilst, other CNSL-blends have given rise to operational problems such as:

• Fuel sludging
• Fuel injector failure
• Corrosion of engine parts
• Filter clogging
• Fuel system deposits
• Corrosion of turbocharger nozzle rings
• Damage to Selective Catalytic Reactor (SCR) units.

The quality of the CNSL, through its production and refining processes, will of course be significantly influential in relation to the quality of the fuel, but also the quality of the fossil fuel with which it is blended, will also have an influence.

A B100 Case Study

In early 2024, two vessels bunkered a B100 fuel in Flushing. The B100, was assumed to be 100% FAME, however, the first vessel began burning the fuel and experienced significant difficulties with blocked filters, delayed ignition and abnormal exhaust temperatures. Prior to burning the fuel, the second vessel sent samples to VPS for testing and via proprietary GCMS methodology. The fuel was found to consist of 40% FAME, 10% FAME Bottoms and 50% CNSL. So theoretically the fuel was a B100, it just wasn’t the 100% FAME, which had been ordered. This case highlights the need to know your fuel, its components and for biofuels, the need to know if the bio-source is truly sustainable? Having the fuel certified by an independent body such as ISCC, accompanied by independent testing from VPS, will provide the necessary confidence regarding the biofuel.

Potential Contaminating Properties of CNSL

In the final quarter of 2024, a VPS customer experienced numerous operational issues with its vessels when burning VLSFO fuels. These issues included blocked filters, delayed ignition and abnormal exhaust temperatures. On testing the fuel, GCMS analysis detected and identified the presence of 10,000-15,000ppm of CNSL within these fuels.

Up to the end of 2024, CNSL, which is a non-volatile chemical species, could only be detected using high-end, GCMS methodology. As CNSL is now more common within the fuel supply chain, it brings an elevated risk of potential contamination to fossil fuel supplies.

Therefore, VPS has developed a pre-burn, rapid screening technique, which detects and identifies the presence CNSL and other non-volatile organic chemicals. Whereas previously, only volatile organic chemicals could be detected by GCMS-Headspace Screening, this new and unique development of a qualitative GCMS-Headspace chemical screening method makes it possible, within a single analysis, to detect volatile (VOC), semi-volatile (SVOC) and non-volatile (NVOC) components within HSFO and VLSFO fuels. 

Over the upcoming weeks, VPS will be releasing a technical white paper covering the development of this new GCMS-HS Advanced Screening Method, which is now available from every VPS laboratory.

CNSL Summary – Friend or Foe?

CNSL has certainly divided opinion of its applicability to be considered as a bio-component within marine biofuels. Its natural high level of acidity and reactivity, along with its potential to polymerise, certainly raises negative questions. Data would indicate using 100% CNSL as a fuel should be avoided, along with blending CNSL with HSFO fuels. Vessel operational issues, due to the presence of high levels of CNSL have caused fuel system, engine and exhaust damages.

For the purposes of ISO 8217:2024 and all preceding versions, CNSL is not recognised as a standard fuel component. Accordingly, its presence in a marine fuel may be considered a contaminant and potentially classified as off-specification when assessed against the ISO 8217 standard.

However, in instances where CNSL is intentionally used as a blending component and does not fully conform to any of the defined categories within ISO 8217, the fuel may still be deemed acceptable—provided that its characteristics and specification limits are mutually agreed upon by the buyer and seller. In such cases, the fuel shall be classified under an appropriate category defined in ISO 8217, accompanied by any necessary deviations or additional parameters required to adequately characterise the fuel's properties.

It is also worth noting that CNSL production and refining techniques are improving in order to produce a higher quality product. As stated, when the CNSL has a Cardanol content of >98%, with a significant reduction in the presence of Cardol and Anacardic Acid, then the product is a far less reactive component. Therefore, from a fuel purchasers perspective, it will be the choice of the CNSL supplier and the production processes they employ, which will be a significant factor in what is received and the CNSL properties, behaviour and overall quality of the product.

CNSL does require a much higher level of fuel management than other fossil fuel, or biofuel blends. So, whether it is in the development of a fit-for-purpose marine fuel blend, or in damage prevention detection of CNSL as a contaminant within fuels, VPS can provide high level, in-depth, expertise and experience in relation to CNSL-based fuels.

[By: Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore]

Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore (BV) is reinforcing its commitment to sustainable shipping by classing a series of methanol-ready oil and chemical tankers for Union Maritime, which are currently being equipped with wind propulsion systems, including Norsepower Rotor Sails™ (NPRS™).

The first two vessels in this series, Buran and Ostro, have been delivered in February and April 2025 respectively, following their construction at Fujian Southeast Shipbuilding. Union Maritime have two additional 18,500 dwt tankers currently under construction at Fujian Southeast Shipbuilding and two more at Wuhu Shipyard Co., Ltd, which will all be equipped with Norsepower Rotor Sails™, with deliveries scheduled throughout 2025.

These six vessels mark the first wave of a broader new build programme for Union Maritime under BV class. More than 25 additional tankers are scheduled for delivery between 2026 and 2028, including a significant series at Wuhu Shipyard, with further vessels being built at other major Chinese shipyards. These vessels will either be delivered with wind propulsion systems installed or prepared for future integration, using technologies from various suppliers such as Norsepower.

By incorporating wind propulsion systems and methanol-ready configurations, Union Maritime is aiming to improve energy efficiency and support long-term emissions reduction across its expanding fleet.

BV supports the integration of these systems by conducting evaluations on the vessels to assess compliance with the relevant rules and notations to help ensure they meet the latest standards for both wind propulsion and alternative fuels, like methanol. This includes its Rules for Wind Propulsion Systems (NR 206), the Wind Propulsion 1 and Wind Propulsion 2 notations for vessels equipped with wind propulsion systems, as well as the METHANOLFUEL-PREPARED notation. BV has provided comprehensive support throughout the project, including an efficient and thorough review of the upgraded design to meet class requirements and delivery schedules.

Bhuvnesh Dogra, Head of Technical at Union Maritime, said: “The deliveries of Buran and Ostro mark an exciting first step in our broader new build programme under Bureau Veritas class. These six vessels represent the beginning of an ambitious plan to modernize our fleet with advanced wind propulsion systems. Bureau Veritas' expertise in classing these vessels helps ensure that we meet the highest safety and regulatory standards, while also positioning ourselves at the forefront of sustainable shipping. This collaboration with Bureau Veritas is critical as we continue to build a fleet that not only meets the evolving demands of the industry but also leads the way in emissions reduction and energy efficiency.”

Matthieu de Tugny, President of Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore, said: "BV is delighted to support Union Maritime with the integration of sustainable shipping solutions into its fleet. Safety remains paramount in the adoption of new technologies, and our classification framework helps ensure that the innovations meet safety and regulatory standards. By classing these vessels, we support ship owners and operators in navigating the transition to more sustainable operations, while maintaining the safety and reliability of their fleets."

Heikki Pöntynen, CEO, Norsepower, said: “We’re proud that six of Union Maritime’s new methanol-ready tankers are being equipped with Norsepower Rotor Sails™, marking a strong commitment to wind propulsion as a key decarbonization solution. This growing fleet demonstrates how wind-assist technologies can be scaled in parallel with alternative fuels to deliver immediate and long-term emissions reductions. Having the classification of Bureau Veritas — one of the most respected classification societies — is a clear validation of the quality, reliability, and safety of our technology. It’s an exciting milestone, and one that reinforces wind propulsion as a core component of sustainable shipping.”

 

S&P Global agreed to acquire the Automatic Identification System (AIS) data services business of ORBCOMM in a move designed to strengthen its supply chain and maritime offerings. It points to the growing uncertainties in global supply chains saying the acquisition as well as a new equity position in ORBCOMM build on the complementary strengths to provide greater essential intelligence to customers.

ORBCOMM was one of the pioneers in AIS which S&P highlights is used today to track and monitor vessels, enhancing maritime visibility and delivering critical insights that support business intelligence and decision-making for government and commercial clients worldwide.

The standardized AIS system began to emerge in the 1990s and by the early 200s, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) was moving to mandate the use of AIS. It was first introduced for newbuilds and later required as retrofits to all ocean-going commercial vessels. 

Since 2004, ORBCOMM's AIS vessel tracking technology has incorporated high-quality, proprietary data with satellite and terrestrial-based coverage. Its AIS solutions are utilized for diverse applications such as supply chain visibility, maritime safety, surveillance and security, environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance, and more. 

"With the uncertainties surrounding global markets and supply chains, this strategic acquisition underscores our commitment to investing in differentiated data and solutions that can help our customers navigate the volatility," said Whit McGraw, Head of Risk & Valuations Services at S&P Global Market Intelligence. "ORBCOMM's AIS data services business offers cutting-edge technology and coverage that strengthens our energy transition and maritime supply chain offering, giving us ample opportunity to invest in new product innovations."

The financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed. ORBCOMM's AIS data services will be integrated within the S&P Global Market Intelligence division of S&P Global.  

S&P Global also announced it has entered into an agreement to take a strategic equity position in ORBCOMM. The two organizations report they will create a strategic alliance to develop a range of differentiated supply chain data and insight offerings.

In addition to the maritime applications, ORBCOMM offers services dedicated to the overland transport sector as well as heavy industry. The company also offers satellite connectivity services and it is used by government as well as sectors such as natural resources.

The companies said the acquisition, which is subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close during 2025. 
 

 

The U.S. government is continuing its support to strengthen the capabilities of the Tunisian armed forces to enable them to respond effectively to a fragile security situation and a worsening immigrant crisis in the northern Africa region. According to U.S. officials in Tunisia for the commissioning of two former USCG cutters, these steps are reinforcing the enduring partnership between the two countries.

The two Island Class patrol boats, which had been part of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) fleet for years before they were decommissioned, were commissioned into at the naval base in La Goulette on April 17. They are expected to help the North African nation deal with growing security challenges including human trafficking, smuggling, organized crime, illegal immigration, and terrorism.

Now christened Tazarga and Menzel Bourguiba, the two 34-meter vessels were part of the 49-vessel Island class that was built between 1985 and 1992 for the U.S. Coast Guard. One of their key missions was in the war on drugs and later their mandates were extended to encompass the whole range of Coast Guard missions including search and rescue, fisheries enforcement, migrant, and military operations. The Island class ships, all of which were built at Bollinger's Lockport, Louisiana shipyard, are being replaced with Sentinel-class patrol boats.

Today, a majority of the boats have been retired from American service but most continue to serve in many allied foreign coast guards and navies. Among the recipients of the ships are Pakistan, Ukraine, Greece, Georgia, and Costa Rica.

 

 

The U.S. contends the donation of the two vessels to the Tunisian Navy is critical in strengthening Tunisia’s capacity to secure its maritime borders and advance regional security. Equipped with twin diesel engines that allow them to achieve speeds of up to 30 knots, the boats can operate over a range exceeding 3,000 nautical miles, a capability that is ideal for patrolling Tunisia’s vast coastline. Each vessel is armed with a 25mm Mk 38 machine gun and two .50 caliber machine guns and also features advanced radar and navigation systems.

The two vessels are the latest military assets that the U.S. has donated to Tunisia. In recent months, the U.S. has also donated four Textron C-208EX aircraft and six C-130 military aircraft to the Tunisian Air Force to support its intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Apart from military assets and equipment donations, Washington has also invested more than $1 billion in security cooperation with Tunisia since 2011.

The commissioning of Tazarga and Menzel Bourguiba into the Tunisia Navy fleet coincided with a scheduled port visit of the Blue Ridge-class command and control ship, USS Mount Whitney to the country as part of the U.S. commitment to regional stability.

“The visit is especially meaningful because it falls during the 220th anniversary of the 1805 Battle of Derna, when, through the support and cooperation of Tunisia, the U.S. military defeated maritime terrorism to make a more stable and secure region for commerce and economic development,” said Joey Hood, U.S. Ambassador to Tunisia.

Forward deployed to Gaeta, Italy, Mount Whitney, is part of the 6th Fleet area of operations that supports U.S. national security interests, security, and stability in Europe and Africa.
 

 

After two weeks, Estonian authorities are saying they continue to wait for word from the managers of a detained tanker that the issues leading to its detention have been resolved. The Kiwala (115,000 dwt) remains anchored in Muuga Bay and is being guarded by the Navy including with its flagship and patrol boats.

Estonian authorities with the Transportation Administration told the news outlet ERR that the Kiwala's captain and crew have been cooperating with the investigation. They are however waiting for confirmation from the oil tanker's representative that the ship's issues have been resolved.

Kristjan Truu, Director of the Maritime Department at the Transport Administration, had said when the ship was detained on April 11 that they were hopeful for a “swift resolution.” Speaking to ERR he said, "Once we have received confirmation, inspectors from the Transport Administration can go on board to carry out a follow-up inspection."

Over the past year, Estonia officials said there has been an increase in unknown insurance-covered vessel transits through the Gulf of Finland. These activities they assert pose a threat to Estonia’s critical infrastructure, safe navigation, and the marine environment. As such, they said they were acting under their rights and obligations as a port state when they stopped the vessel for an inspection.

Since June, the Transport Administration reports it has inspected the documents of 458 vessels. During these inspections, a variety of insurance documents were submitted to the authority. One forgery was identified, and additional documents suspected of being falsified were sent to the relevant flag states for verification. In cooperation with other authorities, the Transport Administration reports it had also conducted inspections of seven vessels in anchor areas.

What initially started as a routine check of documents however quickly escalated aboard Kiwala into the ongoing detention. The ship claimed to be registered in Djibouti, but in a check, they were told the flag had been withdrawn due to “illegal activities.” The tanker is sanctioned by the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Switzerland for previous illegal activities.

Inspectors spent the full day aboard the vessel on April 11 and carried out an extended inspection of the vessel. They identified several significant deficiencies that led the authorities to say the vessel could not be allowed the vessel to continue its voyage, as maritime and environmental safety cannot be guaranteed.

Out of the 40 deficiencies, 29 were significant and constituted the basis for detaining the vessel. The majority of these — 23 in total — were related to documentation, while the remaining deficiencies concerned the implementation of the ship’s safety management system, crew preparedness for various shipboard emergencies, and technical issues.

Until the authorities have been satisfied that all the issues have been corrected, Estonia will continue to detain the tanker. It was traveling in ballast inbound for Russia’s Ust-Luga terminal.

The European Commission announced yesterday that it was also moving to tighten restrictions on vessels transiting European waters. Even if the vessels are not making a port call, the EC resolution now requires the vessels to file proof of insurance. It is seen as a further crackdown targeting vessels such as the Kiwala operating as part of the shadow fleet servicing the Russian oil industry.

The Panhellenic Seaman’s Federation and other unions in Greece are demanding an investigation and better enforcement of safety regulations after a seafarer was killed as a ferry was unloading overnight in Patras. The unions called for a rally and 24-hour strike starting Friday, April 25, asserting that safety regulations are being repeatedly violated and ignored by the authorities.

The ferry AF Claudia (24,418 gross tons) docked at the port of Patras at 22:50 on Thursday, April 24, completing the approximately 32-hour run from Venice to Patras with a stop in Igoumenitsa. Built in 2001 and registered in Italy, the RoRo ferry can accommodate up to 950 passengers and has a 2,044 linear meter garage that can handle approximately 100 vehicles.

The ferry is owned by Italy’s Adria Ferries. It is operated under charter to Greece’s Attica Group. It is operating for the SuperFast Ferry brand.

According to the Hellenic Coast Guard, a truck was backing up on the vessel’s ramp when its trailer struck a 47-year-old female seafarer which Attica Group said was working on the vessel’s hotel department. She was fatally injured by the truck with the police reporting the driver has been detained. The ferry remained in Patras on Friday.

Attica Group issued a brief statement expressing condolences for the loss early on Friday morning of the crewmember. The Greek Maritime Accident Investigation Service (ELYDNA) reported it was sending a team to Patras to investigate the cause of the tragic incident.

Media reports are highlighting that the Patras Labour Center had earlier this month issued a warning of “grave risk” for the safety of crew and passengers as well as ships. They contend that safety is in danger during loading and unloading and as vessels arrive and depart ports. Reports assert there is a poor safety record for the ferries operating on the routes between Italy and Greece.

The unions called for a rally starting at 18:30 today, Friday, April 25, and for a 24-hour strike beginning at 19:00 today till Saturday, April 26 at 19:00. It comes as the summer tourist season begins in Greece.

A strike had previously been planned for May 1. The unions announced another rally planned for next Thursday preceding the start of that strike. The union was planning to use the May Day event to highlight working conditions in its ongoing protests. It also staged a one-day strike on April 9 as part of its demands for better wages and working conditions.

Greece’s Minister of Shipping and Island Policy Vassilis Kikilias wrote his condolences on social media. He said it was important to never forget that seafarers face danger every day at sea and their protection and safety must always come first.

German renewable energy giant RWE is set to announce that it has stopped its offshore activities in the United States and setting higher requirements for future investments because of the “political developments.” The company follows TotalEnergies, Shell, and BP which previously announced they were backing away from projects in the U.S., and Equinor which last week said it is considering “legal remedies” after Trump’s Department of Energy suspending offshore work on a full-permitted wind farm off New York.

RWE released a manuscript of the speech Dr. Markus Krebber, CEO of RWE, will deliver next week, April 30, during the company’s annual meeting. In the speech, he will highlight the company’s many successes in 2024 and the progress being made on the Sofia wind farm for the UK and with the Danish wind farm Thor. He notes RWE has a combined offshore wind farm capacity currently of 3.3 GW and a further four projects with a capacity of 4.4 GW under construction.

Turning to the U.S. market environment, Krebber will tell shareholders, “We have stopped our offshore activities for the time being,” while the company has also introduced “higher requirements for future investments in the U.S.” He says despite the company’s success with onshore wind, solar energy, and battery storage, “Nevertheless, we remain cautious given the political developments.”

RWE became the largest leaseholder in the New York Bight with a potential 3-gigawatt area it won in the hotly contested 2022 offshore auction. At the end of the same year, RWE won a lease area to develop up to 1.6 GW off the coast of Northern California, which it projected would be one of the first commercial-scale floating wind farms in the country. It is also working with Greater New Orleans and GNOwind Alliance for regional opportunities. It launched site investigations off California in 2024 and proposed the Community Wind project with 1.3 GW of capacity to New York State.

The company in November 2024 warned it was delaying investments citing higher risks for offshore wind in the U.S. and a slower ramp-up of the European hydrogen economy. Krebber will tell shareholders next week the company has raised its threshold expectations for new investments. For future projects, he says they will increase the average return requirement from 8 percent to more than 8.5 percent.

For the U.S., he notes while the company surpassed 10 GW of generation capacity from renewable energy at the start of 2025, RWE will enforce higher requirements for future investments. This includes having all necessary federal permits in place, tax credits being safe harbored, and all relevant tariff risks mitigated. Only if these conditions are met for future investments, for the time being in onshore wind and solar, will it “be possible given the political environment.”

Developers of U.S. offshore wind projects remain concerned after the moves by the Trump administration including launching a review of the leasing process, pulling permits for projects in New York and New Jersey, and stopping funding on a research project in Maine. At the beginning of the month, four offshore projects were reported to be proposing to delay their state-level regulatory reviews. Shell reported in November 2024 that it would take a $1 billion charge as it moved away from U.S. offshore wind projects and Equinor said if a full-stop ensues for its Empire Wind project, it would have to repay $1.5 billion in financing and would be exposed to termination fees from its suppliers.
 

Ukraine’s Security Service and its State Board Service are reporting they have seized an unnamed cargo ship that they accursed of looting grain from Crimea. The action came as Ukraine continued to assert it would not cede the occupied region to Russia despite Donald Trump’s statements recognizing the area as Russian.

According to the announcement, Ukrainian forces detained the cargo ship in the “internal waters of the Black Sea area of Ukraine.” The SBU released pictures of its forces on the bridge of the vessel and documents it said it found during a search of the ship. They reported finding “physical evidence” during the search of the vessel and its navigational equipment that confirmed the “looting of Ukrainian agricultural products by the Russians.”

Ukraine is asserting the vessel loaded 5,000 tons of wheat in the port of Sevastopol in 2024, which it refers to as “temporarily occupied territory in southern Ukraine.” It further asserts the vessel was hiding its actions by “operating under the flag of one of the Asian countries.”

The vessel has now been officially arrested, and the crew placed in detention. Ukraine says the crew will be transferred for “procedural actions.”

 

Ukraine asserts it found physical evidence the ship transported wheat from Crimea in 2024 (SBU)

 

Ukraine has repeatedly accused the Russians of stealing grain and other materials during its occupation of ports and other areas in Ukraine and Crimea. Russia seized the Crimea peninsular in 2014. Last year, the open media source Bellingcat and Lloyd’s List published an exposé on the shipping of grain from Crimea.

Another vessel was seized in July 2024 by the Ukrainian authorities as the ship was sailing outbound on the Danube. It was alleged that the vessel had transported grain from Crimea in 2023 and again earlier in 2024. A Ukrainian court later awarded custody of the vessel to the state and ordered the captain and an officer detained for prosecution.

Today’s announcement followed statements by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that under his country’s constitution, he could not and would not cede Crimea to Russia. In the past, he has called Crimea a “red line” in the efforts to end the war with Russia. 

Trump is being quoted in an interview published on April 25 in Time Magazine as saying “Crimea will stay with Russia … Zelensky understands that.” Trump has been critical of Ukraine saying it is prolonging the war and creating impediments to the peace talks which he is anxious to conclude. 

Ukraine’s announcement of the seizure came as U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in an effort to move the peace talks forward.

[By: VPS]

Cashew Nut Shell Liquid - Background

As demand grows from all modes of transportation for low-to-zero carbon fuels, to support efforts in complying and achieving numerous environmental legislation leading to global decarbonisation, many alternative fuel sources are being considered. One of the most common and in demand sources of such fuels, is Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME), as either a 100% fuel-source, or as part of a bio-fossil blend. But with road transportation, aviation and shipping, all seeking to use FAME in their respective biofuels, demand is outweighing supply. Therefore, other bio-materials are being considered as alternatives to FAME.

One such material is Cashew Nut Shell Liquid (CNSL), which is the oil extracted from the shells of the cashew nut. This by-product of the cashew industry is a naturally occurring substituted phenol, which is abundantly available and a waste product, with a lower demand than FAME. The composition, properties and quality of CNSL depend upon the specific manufacturing production process used to extract the oil from the shell. These vary from, mechanical pressing to solvent extraction, vacuum pyrolysis, vacuum distillation or solvent extraction.

The industrial applications where CNSL is a key component are wide ranging and include, the production of polymers, plastics, resins, adhesives, surface coatings, insecticides, fungicides, anti-termite products and even pharmaceutical products.

There are three main components of CNSL, these are Cardanol, (also known as Ginkgol), Cardol and Anacardic Acid:

These substituted phenols tend to exhibit high acid number values (>3mgKOH/g). They also show high iodine values (>300gI2/100g), indicating an elevated level of unsaturation and hence increased degrees of reactivity and instability. Then also, high potassium levels leading to potential post-combustion deposits and corrosion of turbocharger nozzle rings.

As monomers, these chemicals are also prone to polymerisation at temperatures, >200ºC. As a consequence CNSL is potentially a highly reactive, very corrosive material.

However, the levels of acidity and reactivity can be reduced during the production and refining process by converting Cardol and Anacardic Acid to Cardanol. If the CNSL is >98% Cardanol, then the reactivity is significantly reduced.

VPS Testing of CNSL as a Biofuel

Over the past 3 years VPS have tested various CNSL compounds and fuel-blends to assess the potential of CNSL to be a viable biofuel.

Firstly, the use of CNSL blends can significantly reduce HC, CO/CO2 and smoke emissions, although they can raise NOx emissions slightly. However, VPS would advise never to use 100% CNSL as a fuel, as its far too reactive and corrosive. Further advice is to always check with the OEM regarding the compatibility of CNSL-based biodiesel blended products, with their machinery. Traditional marine fuels when blended with CNSL, may reduce the high acid number, reactivity and potassium levels of 100% CNSL, but also increase the energy content, sulphur content, cold-flow and sediment potential issues.

Fuel Combustion Analysis (FCA) of CNSL/Fossil Fuel Blends

In the recent past, VPS have tested CNSL products, blended with marine gas oil (MGO), very low sulphur fuel oils (VLSFO) and high sulphur fuel oils (HSFO). When undertaking fuel combustion analysis (FCA) of CNSL blended at varying percentages with MGO, VLSFO and HSFO, a wide range of results were produced in relation to, estimated cetane number, ignition delay and rate of heat release (ROHR), examples are given in the table below:

The CNSL blends with HSFO which undertook FCA, were particularly poor, with low Estimated Cetane Number (ECN), long Ignition Delay and low ROHR. CNSL blended with VLSFO gave better results, with acceptable ECN, shorter ignition delay and improved ROHR. Blending CNSL with MGO, gave better results than those obtained by HSFO/CNSL and VLSFO/CNSL blends.

Whether the blends were 80/20, 70/30 or 50/50 Fossil/CNSL, the blends using HSFO consistently gave the poorest FCA results. This may be due to a negative interaction between the asphaltenic content of the HSFO and the acidic nature of the CNSL.

Each of the CNSL blends gave poorer FCA results, when compared with the 100% fossil fuels, HSFO, VLSFO, MGO and 100% FAME.

Please note, to VPS knowledge, the above highlighted CNSL blends were not burnt onboard a vessel.

Burning CNSL/Fossil Blends

CNSL-blended fuels with MGO, VLSFO, or HSFO, have shown mixed reactions to vessel operations, where some CNSL-blends have been stored and burnt without issue, whilst, other CNSL-blends have given rise to operational problems such as:

• Fuel sludging
• Fuel injector failure
• Corrosion of engine parts
• Filter clogging
• Fuel system deposits
• Corrosion of turbocharger nozzle rings
• Damage to Selective Catalytic Reactor (SCR) units.

The quality of the CNSL, through its production and refining processes, will of course be significantly influential in relation to the quality of the fuel, but also the quality of the fossil fuel with which it is blended, will also have an influence.

A B100 Case Study

In early 2024, two vessels bunkered a B100 fuel in Flushing. The B100, was assumed to be 100% FAME, however, the first vessel began burning the fuel and experienced significant difficulties with blocked filters, delayed ignition and abnormal exhaust temperatures. Prior to burning the fuel, the second vessel sent samples to VPS for testing and via proprietary GCMS methodology. The fuel was found to consist of 40% FAME, 10% FAME Bottoms and 50% CNSL. So theoretically the fuel was a B100, it just wasn’t the 100% FAME, which had been ordered. This case highlights the need to know your fuel, its components and for biofuels, the need to know if the bio-source is truly sustainable? Having the fuel certified by an independent body such as ISCC, accompanied by independent testing from VPS, will provide the necessary confidence regarding the biofuel.

Potential Contaminating Properties of CNSL

In the final quarter of 2024, a VPS customer experienced numerous operational issues with its vessels when burning VLSFO fuels. These issues included blocked filters, delayed ignition and abnormal exhaust temperatures. On testing the fuel, GCMS analysis detected and identified the presence of 10,000-15,000ppm of CNSL within these fuels.

Up to the end of 2024, CNSL, which is a non-volatile chemical species, could only be detected using high-end, GCMS methodology. As CNSL is now more common within the fuel supply chain, it brings an elevated risk of potential contamination to fossil fuel supplies.

Therefore, VPS has developed a pre-burn, rapid screening technique, which detects and identifies the presence CNSL and other non-volatile organic chemicals. Whereas previously, only volatile organic chemicals could be detected by GCMS-Headspace Screening, this new and unique development of a qualitative GCMS-Headspace chemical screening method makes it possible, within a single analysis, to detect volatile (VOC), semi-volatile (SVOC) and non-volatile (NVOC) components within HSFO and VLSFO fuels. 

Over the upcoming weeks, VPS will be releasing a technical white paper covering the development of this new GCMS-HS Advanced Screening Method, which is now available from every VPS laboratory.

CNSL Summary – Friend or Foe?

CNSL has certainly divided opinion of its applicability to be considered as a bio-component within marine biofuels. Its natural high level of acidity and reactivity, along with its potential to polymerise, certainly raises negative questions. Data would indicate using 100% CNSL as a fuel should be avoided, along with blending CNSL with HSFO fuels. Vessel operational issues, due to the presence of high levels of CNSL have caused fuel system, engine and exhaust damages.

For the purposes of ISO 8217:2024 and all preceding versions, CNSL is not recognised as a standard fuel component. Accordingly, its presence in a marine fuel may be considered a contaminant and potentially classified as off-specification when assessed against the ISO 8217 standard.

However, in instances where CNSL is intentionally used as a blending component and does not fully conform to any of the defined categories within ISO 8217, the fuel may still be deemed acceptable—provided that its characteristics and specification limits are mutually agreed upon by the buyer and seller. In such cases, the fuel shall be classified under an appropriate category defined in ISO 8217, accompanied by any necessary deviations or additional parameters required to adequately characterise the fuel's properties.

It is also worth noting that CNSL production and refining techniques are improving in order to produce a higher quality product. As stated, when the CNSL has a Cardanol content of >98%, with a significant reduction in the presence of Cardol and Anacardic Acid, then the product is a far less reactive component. Therefore, from a fuel purchasers perspective, it will be the choice of the CNSL supplier and the production processes they employ, which will be a significant factor in what is received and the CNSL properties, behaviour and overall quality of the product.

CNSL does require a much higher level of fuel management than other fossil fuel, or biofuel blends. So, whether it is in the development of a fit-for-purpose marine fuel blend, or in damage prevention detection of CNSL as a contaminant within fuels, VPS can provide high level, in-depth, expertise and experience in relation to CNSL-based fuels.