Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Joint Finance Committee votes to release PFAS settlement funding 

A sign warning people not to drink water contaminated with PFAS chemicals in Marinette. (2019 photo by Erik Gunn/Wisconsin Examiner)

The Wisconsin Joint Finance Committee approved the release of nearly $10 million in PFAS settlement funds to the Department of Natural Resources Tuesday, concluding a years-long process to offer help to residents of Marinette County whose drinking water was contaminated with PFAS chemicals

In June 2026, the Marinette County Circuit Court approved a settlement in the State of Wisconsin v. Tyco Fire Products LP. The agreement marked one of the first efforts to hold polluters accountable for PFAS “forever chemical” contamination in Marinette. 

Under the settlement, Tyco agreed to provide safe drinking water to households including by installing new deep wells, maintaining associated treatment of new and existing wells and providing bottled water or treatment to households without a deep well. 

Tyco also agreed to provide more than $9.9 million to the state’s PFAS fund, which was established in the state’s 2023-25 budget and holds funding for the mitigation of PFAS contamination. The settlement did not specify how the funds should be used, but a legislative committee had to sign off before the DNR could use them. 

The DNR held two listening sessions in Marinette to get input on how to use the settlement money and used the feedback to come up with a plan, which includes using the funds for activities that provide safe drinking water and health information to impacted residents.

Settlement money in the state of Wisconsin has to be approved for use by the Joint Finance Committee under state law. Gov. Tony Evers had urged the budget committee last month to release the funds so they could be put to use as soon as possible. 

“I’m glad that these critical investments will be getting out the door to get PFAS out of our water for good and ensure every Wisconsinite has access to clean, safe drinking water,” Evers said in a statement after the committee voted. “This is a big step in the right direction, and the DNR will continue to collaborate with local leaders and communities to ensure we get these funds out the door and to the impacted communities to address their most urgent needs in a timely fashion.”

The committee unanimously approved the release of the funds to the DNR’s general program operations appropriation in 2026-27 to provide PFAS-free drinking water and health information to residents of the City of Marinette and the Town of Peshtigo affected by PFAS contamination. 

The transfer of the funds to the general operations will allow for “expeditious allocation of the settlement funds to the impacted community in accordance with preferences expressed by local residents,” according to papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. 

Between $6 million and $9.2 million, or about 90% of the funds, will be used to provide safe drinking water to owners of private wells contaminated by PFAS. Up to $1 million will be used for private well testing, up to $7 million will be used for deep well installation and up to $1.2 million will be used for in-home PFAS treatment installation. Some of the funds will also be used for long-term operations and maintenance, though that cost is to be determined. 

Between $20,000 and $50,000 will be used to offer blood serum testing for PFAS to residents of the city of Marinette. 

Between $500,000 and $750,000 will be used to support a community liaison consultant to help residents access settlement funds. Sen. Eric Wimberger (R-Gillett), who voted for the release of the funds, expressed concerns about the use of funds for that purpose. 

“We’re talking about 500 people, and we’re going to be paying upwards of that amount to essentially fill out your forms,” Wimberger said. “The bulk of what you’re doing is great. You got to deal with these immediate problems with the wells which it focuses on, but there are also long-term problems up there, which is keeping biosolids out of the environment to begin with.” 

Biosolids are the byproducts of municipal wastewater treatment utilities that are sold or given away to farms to be used as fertilizer. The DNR grants permits that allow for the spreading of them, but biosolids from places with PFAS contamination in the water are contaminated and could pollute the water near the field where they’re spread. 

As Evers and lawmakers, including Wimberger, have worked on PFAS issues, Wimberger expressed concerns about farmers being held responsible for spreading PFAS through contaminated biosolids. The issue created gridlock that held up funding to address PFAS contamination for years. 

“I hope that in the future, you at least focus a little bit on maybe some treatment plants located at the landfill site, so it doesn’t get into the municipal treatment facilities and onto our farms,” Wimberger added.

Evers, DNR push finance committee to release $10 million in PFAS settlement funds

A sign warning people not to drink water contaminated with PFAS chemicals in Marinette. (2019 photo by Erik Gunn/Wisconsin Examiner)

Gov. Tony Evers and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources are asking the Legislature’s Republican-controlled Joint Committee on Finance to release $10 million the state received earlier this summer as part of a lawsuit settlement with Tyco Fire Products over PFAS contamination in the Marinette area. 

In June, Tyco and the state reached the settlement agreement, marking one of the first efforts in the state to hold a polluter responsible for PFAS pollution. The Marinette area’s water has been affected by PFAS contamination for years. 

Under state law, money received by the state in lawsuit settlements is under the control of JFC — even though the settlement requires that the money be spent by the DNR for PFAS remediation. 

On Thursday, Evers and DNR Secretary Karen Hyun urged the committee to release the funds quickly so the money can get out to residents. Evers said that after the DNR held listening sessions with community members, the settlement funds would be directed to help people with private wells test for PFAS and replace contaminated wells. 

“Every Wisconsinite deserves to have clean, safe water to drink, and for the past seven-plus years, my administration and I have been working to fight these forever chemicals that are affecting the health and well-being of kids, families, farmers, livestock, crops, and communities all over Wisconsin,” Evers said in a statement. “I’m proud of our work to create the PFAS Trust Fund, which is available to help ensure the state can support Wisconsinites in getting contaminants like PFAS out of their water for good.”

The DNR collaborated with local leaders and held listening sessions to develop the plan for spending the settlement money “to ensure these funds are put to good use and address the urgent needs of the impacted communities,” Evers said.

“I urge lawmakers to act quickly and approve our request by releasing these funds as quickly as possible so we can continue this fight and ensure Wisconsinites have clean drinking water,” he added.

The money has been deposited in the state’s PFAS trust fund, which was created as part of the 2023-25 budget to help the state remediate PFAS pollution. Earlier this year, Evers signed into law a bill that creates a number of programs aimed at getting that money out the door.

Guest opinion: Many Wisconsin firefighters missed a chance at toxic foam compensation. Here’s how to fix that.

White containers labeled “Thunderstorm 1% or 3% ATC AR-AFFF” and “3M 6%” are stacked on pallets inside a truck trailer beside a pallet jack.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

When the filing window for lawsuits seeking compensation for cancers and other illnesses linked to exposure to toxic aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) closed on Sept. 5, 2025, it did so with little notice to the firefighters it was meant to protect, including those in Wisconsin.

Fewer than 13,000 claims were filed nationwide, a small fraction of the more than 1 million firefighters in the United States. This gap has raised questions about awareness of the filing process and access to legal information among potentially affected individuals.

Firefighters in smaller and volunteer departments may have faced additional barriers to learning about filing deadlines. In many of these departments, limited administrative resources, part-time staffing and reduced access to legal outreach may have limited the reach of information about filing deadlines to some personnel.

This is a story about who did not file a lawsuit and why many firefighters may have been left behind while companies that profited from toxic products continue to avoid full accountability.

Toxic foam, local consequences

For decades, AFFF has been widely used by fire departments, industrial sites and military facilities because of its ability to rapidly suppress fuel-based fires. The foam’s effectiveness comes from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of toxic chemicals known for their serious health risks.

Often called “forever chemicals,” PFAS persist in the environment and build up in the human body. Studies have linked PFAS exposure to kidney and testicular cancers, thyroid disease, immune dysfunction, and other long-term illnesses. Firefighters show higher PFAS levels in their blood than the general population from routine AFFF use and wearing PFAS-contaminated turnout gear meant to protect them.

PFAS contamination is widespread in Wisconsin. Elevated levels of these toxic chemicals have been found in the state’s drinking water, resulting from firefighting foam used at military installations and airports. While the contamination threatened the public through the water supply, it also exposed the risks firefighters faced from regularly using the foam.

A broken notification system

Wisconsin is home to 809 fire departments and roughly 25,000 firefighters. Nearly 80% of those departments rely on volunteer personnel. Many of those firefighters may have been exposed to AFFF during their service, yet the exact number of Wisconsin firefighters who filed claims before the Sept. 5 deadline is not available in consolidated public data. Nationwide, fewer than 13,000 claims were submitted in total, a figure that suggests vast numbers of potentially affected firefighters never filed at all.

Volunteer departments may have faced particular barriers. Many operate with limited administrative resources and part-time staffing, leaving little capacity to track litigation deadlines alongside the demands of active firefighting. Without dedicated staff tracking occupational health developments, information about the filing window may never have reached the people who needed it.

There was also no centralized system to notify retirees or firefighters who had already left service due to illness, the population arguably most in need of compensation. Without a mechanism to track AFFF claims at the local level, many firefighters likely had no way of knowing the window existed at all.

Removing barriers to ensure fair compensation

Firefighters who missed the filing window now face a much harder path to compensation.

Claims may still be filed, but only with causation reports directly linking their illness to PFAS exposure. These reports may cost thousands of dollars in expert fees to obtain, creating heavy burdens for firefighters already battling illness.

U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and U.S. Rep. Darren Soto, D-Fla., introduced the Firefighter PFAS Injury Compensation Act in 2024, but it stalled in committee without a vote. 

Similar legislation should be reintroduced. Such a bill would establish a no‑fault compensation system that presumes PFAS‑related illnesses were caused by PFAS exposure during firefighting activities, allowing eligible firefighters to receive compensation without having to prove causation in the traditional legal sense. Compensation would be tied to the illness and length of service, with determinations required within 120 days of filing.

Beyond legislation, agencies must also mandate outreach programs and unified notification systems for future compensation programs. Such measures would ensure firefighters are not excluded from relief due to broken outreach systems.

For firefighters in Wisconsin and across the nation, these reforms could change lives.

Honoring their sacrifice means delivering on these reforms. We must go beyond symbolic gestures to concrete actions that truly support firefighters both during and after their service. The AFFF filing window revealed a systemic failure. What matters now is whether we choose to learn from it.

Jordan Cade is an attorney with the Environmental Litigation Group, P.C., based in Birmingham, Alabama, where he represents firefighters and their families affected by exposure to PFAS and other toxic chemicals.

Guest commentaries reflect the views of their authors and are independent of the nonpartisan, in-depth reporting produced by Wisconsin Watch’s newsroom staff. Want to join the Wisconversion? See our guidelines for submissions.

Guest opinion: Many Wisconsin firefighters missed a chance at toxic foam compensation. Here’s how to fix that. is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

Tyco agrees to $10 million settlement with Wisconsin over PFAS water contamination

A person in a suit and glasses stands at a wooden podium with a microphone.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

The manufacturer of a firefighting foam that contaminated the water supply in northeastern Wisconsin with PFAS chemicals for decades agreed to a $10 million settlement with the state, the governor and attorney general announced on Thursday.

The settlement comes as residents, communities, regulators and environmental activists across the country are struggling with how to address contamination from PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals.”

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers hailed the settlement with Tyco Fire Products as a “historic and important milestone” in the fight for clean water. The lawsuit filed in 2022 alleged that Tyco, a subsidiary of Johnson Controls, had contaminated the area around a firefighting training center since the 1960s and did not do enough to address it.

“Today’s a key step toward making sure polluters are held accountable, take responsibility for their actions, and ensure Wisconsinites don’t have to foot the bill for cleaning up the messes that others made,” Evers said in a statement announcing the deal.

But residents of the affected city of Marinette were hoping for more.

“The word of the day is underwhelming from our perspective,” said Doug Oitzinger, a former mayor of Marinette and current president of the advocacy group Save Our Water. “The dollar amount disappointed us. Ten million is kind of a drop in the bucket.”

Tyco ended outdoor training sessions with the foam containing PFAS chemicals in 2017. Also that year, the company first started providing bottled water and water purification systems to affected residents. The company says it has spent more than $100 million addressing the contamination.

Tyco said in a statement Thursday that it was pleased to have reached the deal, saying it “reflects the extensive work Tyco has undertaken” to address PFAS pollution.

“We’ve been part of the Marinette community for over 100 years and the spirit of doing what is best for our neighbors and the environment will continue to be our priority,” the company said.

PFAS are often referred to as forever chemicals because they resist breaking down, whether in well water or the environment. In the human body, they accumulate in the liver, kidneys and blood. Research has linked them to an increased risk of certain cancers and developmental delays in children.

The chemicals were developed as coatings to protect consumer goods from stains, water and corrosion. Nonstick cookware, carpets, outdoor gear and food packaging are among items that contain the chemicals. They also are an ingredient in firefighting foams.

Government estimates suggest that up to half of all U.S. households have some level of PFAS in their water — whether it comes from a private well or a tap. It is a widespread problem in Wisconsin and spawned numerous lawsuits.

Under the terms of the settlement announced Thursday, Wisconsin will put the $10 million from Tyco into a trust fund earmarked for PFAS cleanup. Tyco also agreed to continue to provide for replacement wells to provide clean drinking water to affected residents, conduct required monitoring and reporting, and implement further measures for the long-term remediation of the area.

The lawsuit, filed by Democratic Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, alleged that the company violated state law when it failed to notify regulators about a PFAS discharge and did not investigate or remediate the contamination around the Fire Technology Center in Marinette, a city of about 11,000 people that borders Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.

Tyco officials said at the time the lawsuit was filed that the company has invested “considerable resources” on investigating and remediating PFAS pollution from the Marinette firefighting training facility, including offering bottled water and in-home filtration systems to affected residents as well as building a groundwater pollution extraction system.

second lawsuit filed by the state against Tyco and more than a dozen other companies over PFAS contamination in Wisconsin remains active.

The settlement announced Thursday will take effect if it’s approved by the judge overseeing the case.

Oitzinger, the former Marinette mayor, said Tyco was getting off too easy.

“Legally you may have gotten off of some hooks, but morally you’re not there,” he said. “You’re not there by a long shot.”

Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit and nonpartisan newsroom. Subscribe to our newsletters to get our investigative stories and Friday news roundup. This story is published in partnership with The Associated Press.

Tyco agrees to $10 million settlement with Wisconsin over PFAS water contamination is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

❌