Reading Time: 4 minutes

A Madison police officer last week shot and killed Corey Ruiz during an attempted arrest on the city’s east side. The shooting renewed debates about race, policing and use of force, while also prompting broader conversations about homelessness and mental health.

To help readers make sense of the fast-moving story, we’ve collected reporting from across Wisconsin that explains what happened, what’s next and why it matters.

We’re working on several in-depth stories exploring the issues the shooting brought to the forefront, and we’ll continue sharing that reporting in the weeks ahead.

What happened

The shooting unfolded in less than 30 seconds, but questions about what happened and whether the officer’s actions were justified continue to shape public debate.

For readers seeking a closer look at the shooting, ABC News produced a frame-by-frame analysis of the fatal confrontation. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel asked three policing experts to review the encounter. Two raised concerns about the officers’ tactics and use of force, while a third concluded that Ruiz’s resistance during the arrest and the presence of a knife likely justified the officer’s decision to shoot.

The Wisconsin State Journal reviewed Ring camera footage and police scanner audio that shed light on the calls that prompted police to attempt to arrest Ruiz.

Read:

• Madison officials identify Corey Ruiz as man police shot and killed — Associated Press/Wisconsin Watch
• Visual analysis of the deadly Wisconsin police shooting — ABC News
• Some police experts troubled by Madison shooting of Corey Ruiz  — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (republished paywall-free here.) 
• New details emerge about the moments before police shot Corey Ruiz — Wisconsin State Journal

How political leaders are responding

The shooting has become an issue in Wisconsin’s race for governor, while drawing responses from elected officials across the state and beyond. Most political leaders have called for transparency and an independent investigation, but state Rep. Francesca Hong, the Democratic front-runner for governor, quickly labeled the shooting an “execution,” while others — including Republican front-runner U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany — have urged the public not to reach conclusions before the investigation is complete.

Read:

• Candidates for Wisconsin governor react to Madison shooting — Wisconsin Public Radio
• Guv candidates react to police killing in Madison — WisPolitics
• Wisconsin congressional delegation reacts to deadly police shooting — Spectrum News 1

Questions of accountability

The shooting has revived long-standing debates over how Madison investigates police use of force — and whether the city has appropriate oversight tools. As required by state law, the Wisconsin Department of Justice is investigating whether a crime occurred during the shooting. At the same time, the Madison Police Department is conducting an internal administrative investigation into whether officers followed department policies. Madison’s independent police monitor is carrying out a separate review.

WPR explores the role — and limits — of Madison’s independent police monitor and examines why Madison remains one of the few major Wisconsin cities without police body cameras. The Cap Times breaks down what each investigation meant to answer and why city leaders postponed broader police oversight reforms after the shooting.

Read:

• Madison revisits police body cameras after years of debate — WPR 
• Madison’s independent police monitor investigates Corey Ruiz shooting — WPR 
• Here’s what to expect from the Madison police shooting investigations — Cap Times 
• Madison police oversight changes tabled after fatal shooting — Cap Times

Searching for healing

Memorials, protests and an encampment have turned the Willy Street neighborhood into a space for mourning, reflection and demands for accountability.

The Cap Times captures the emotion of a vigil honoring Ruiz. Isthmus explores how the intersection has become an evolving community hub — what some are calling “Corey Street” — while examining why longtime residents see echoes of previous police shootings.

Read:

• At Corey Ruiz’s vigil, a Minneapolis statue stands for solidarity — Cap Times
• A community hub on what’s now dubbed Corey Street — Isthmus
• In the Willy Street neighborhood, history repeats itself — Isthmus

The conversation continues

The shooting has prompted statewide reflection on what healing and recovery might look like.

@wisconsinwatch

Memorials and an encampment have transformed the intersection of Williamson and Baldwin streets into a space for mourning and protest after a Madison police officer fatally shot Corey Ruiz during an attempted arrest on July 22. Businesses near the site face a balancing act. Many owners support calls for justice while struggling with the financial effects of street closures. Here’s a rainy day look at what some have renamed “Corey Street.” Read more about the shooting and its aftermath at WisconsinWatch.org. #coreyruiz #madisonwi

♬ original sound – Wisconsin Watch – Wisconsin Watch

Alan Robinson wrote in Madison365 about what the city owes Ruiz and what meaningful accountability could look like. “Corey Ruiz’s name cannot become a ladder for anyone’s campaign, organization, career or social-media following,” he writes. “No person owns this moment. No organization owns this grief.”

The Wisconsin State Journal, meanwhile, highlights the balancing act facing businesses near the protest site. Many owners support calls for justice while struggling with the financial effects of ongoing street closures.

WMTV reports on the city’s effort to move unhoused people from the area with hotel vouchers. It has drawn criticism from at least one advocates, who argues the strategy prioritizes clearing the neighborhood over addressing long-term housing needs.

Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service gathered a range of voices from Milwaukee and beyond.

“Another senseless police-involved shooting,” Milwaukee resident Bryan Winters said. “I believe there were multiple missed opportunities to get Corey the proper mental health treatment that was missed by the community and the justice system.”

Read:

• The city we owe him — Madison365
• Willy Street businesses feel the strain as encampment enters second week — Wisconsin State Journal
• ‘People don’t want to go’: Madison nonprofit questions city’s motive behind hotel vouchers for unhoused community — WMTV
• We talked to Milwaukee residents and others about the police killing of Corey Durell Ruiz. Here’s what they said. — Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service

We’ll continue sharing reporting that helps add context and clarity as this story unfolds. 

The Corey Ruiz shooting: essential reading is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

One of my favorite parts of managing the Wisconsin Watch newsroom is hearing from readers. Whether you’re sharing a story tip, sending feedback or offering a fresh perspective, those exchanges make our journalism better.

That’s why I was excited to launch our guest commentary initiative.

Since January, we’ve published guest opinions from Wisconsinites with a range of perspectives. Some have written about issues they’ve worked on professionally. Others have drawn from personal experience or original research. Together, they’ve expanded the WisConversation around the most pressing issues affecting us all. 

These commentaries reflect the views of their authors, not Wisconsin Watch. But they still receive the same careful attention we bring to all of our journalism, including fact-checking and editing for clarity. Collaborating with contributors in that process has proved particularly rewarding. Several have expressed appreciation for having an editor scrutinize facts and help them communicate more effectively while maintaining their voice.

Thanks to all who have contributed. Below are the guest commentaries we’ve published just since May. You can find every submission here. 

• After decades in prison, who deserves a chance at clemency? — Sherry Reames, Mark Rice, Joyce Ellwanger and Harlan Richards
• How Congress can reduce deadly falls among older Americans — Kevin Svoboda
• A changing world demands a new vision for graduates — Jill Underly
• Going boating? Wear a life jacket. It could save your life. — Gail R. Kulp
• New federal funding guidelines fail to address root causes of homelessness — Josh Benti
• Many Wisconsin firefighters missed a chance at toxic foam compensation. Here’s how to fix that. — Jordan Cade 
• Rural Wisconsin workers lose health insurance twice as fast as before the pandemic — Jiyue Wang 
• Are your elected officials listening? — Judy Nagel
• Open letters on justice and public safety as Wisconsin weighs commutations — Shannon Ross
• Wisconsin should make polluters pay — Leo Rain
• Celebrate Wisconsin’s overdose decline, but demand accountability for opioid settlement spending — Jiyue Wang 
• We must oppose and ban the use of Flock technology — Nickolas X Doherty

Keep the WisConversation going

We’d love to hear from more of you.

If you have expertise, lived experience or a perspective that could help your neighbors better understand an issue, please consider submitting. 

Find our guidelines here and send your idea to opinion@wisconsinwatch.org.

The WisConversation so far: Hear from your neighbors is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

One of the quieter truths about journalism is that, despite the stereotype of relentless competition between newsrooms, some of our best work depends on collaboration.

That was on my mind this week after our friends at Bolts — a fellow nonprofit newsroom that covers the nuts and bolts of political power and change — offered us the opportunity to co-publish a deeply reported story examining growing backlash to AI-powered Flock surveillance cameras across Wisconsin.

Bolts editor Daniel Nichanian and I have long discussed ways our organizations might work together, considering how our missions overlap. Both newsrooms aim to help people better understand the systems and decisions shaping their lives. So when Daniel asked about our interest in the story, the answer was obvious: absolutely.

The story reported by Pascal Sabino was strong. We offered a few minor suggestions, shared a photo from our archives and published the piece on Friday with two added photos from WPR photojournalist Angela Major — bringing the reporting to Wisconsin Watch audiences. Early engagement suggests the story is resonating.

What struck me most is how ordinary this kind of partnership has become in nonprofit journalism and even among some for-profits. 

In May alone, Wisconsin Watch collaborated with numerous newsrooms. Isthmus devoted space in its print edition to publish our reporting on preventing deadly falls among older adults. We republished key breaking news coverage from WPR on budget negotiations at the Capitol, freeing our own reporters to dig into the political dynamics behind the collapse of the deal. We also published multiple stories from our partners at Votebeat, including important reporting on renewed Trump administration scrutiny of Wisconsin’s 2020 election administration that has created confusion and fear for voters and election officials. 

At the same time, local and statewide outlets across Wisconsin republished original Wisconsin Watch reporting for their own audiences.

Every collaboration works a little differently. Sometimes it means sharing reporting resources. Sometimes it means sharing expertise or audience reach. But the biggest beneficiary is always the public. These partnerships give readers more vetted, deeply reported information that helps communities stay strong, informed and connected. 

And for that, I am grateful.

We don’t compete. We complete. How collaboration strengthens local news is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In relaunching our guest opinion section earlier this year, we asked you to bring us arguments rooted in evidence, lived experience and a genuine interest in Wisconsin’s future.

You’ve delivered — and then some.

Since January, we’ve published perspectives tackling everything from the rise of data centers and threats to groundwater to the systems shaping youth mental health and the everyday pressures of poverty. Here’s what these pieces have in common: They aren’t quickly dashed-off hot takes. They’re arguments built on research and careful thought.

That strength has created a welcome challenge. We’ve received more high-quality submissions than we anticipated, and they require the same kind of fact-checking and editing we apply to our journalism. The result is a longer queue. To those still waiting to see their work published: thanks for your patience. We’re working through them, and there’s much more to come.

Below is a sampling of the WisConversation so far.

As a reminder, these commentaries reflect the views of their authors and are independent of the in-depth reporting produced by Wisconsin Watch’s newsroom staff. Want to join in? Email your submission to opinion@wisconsinwatch.org. 

How poverty’s gravity pulls workers under

“Being poor, it turns out, is expensive,” writes Sachin Shivaram, CEO of Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry in Manitowoc. His experience with employees shows how small setbacks and mounting fees create a gravitational pull that’s nearly impossible to escape.

After-school programs are essential. Wisconsin should fund them that way.

Wisconsin lags behind other states that provide dedicated funding for after-school programs. That leaves an estimated 275,000 children without access to programs that make them safer and healthier, writes Daniel Gage, a consultant with the Afterschool Alliance and Wisconsin Out of School Time Alliance.

In Wisconsin’s CAFO counties, glyphosate monitoring gaps threaten groundwater

State monitoring programs largely overlook glyphosate in northeastern Wisconsin’s CAFO-heavy counties, where groundwater may be most vulnerable, writes Allison Gilmeister, a Yale University graduate student and Appleton native.

How Wisconsin can protect consumers and the environment during the data center boom

Renewable energy and efficiency are the lowest-cost ways to meet soaring demand, but they aren’t enough on their own, writes John Imes, co-founder and executive director of the Wisconsin Environmental Initiative and village president of Shorewood Hills. He argues Wisconsin needs clear guardrails to protect consumers, water and the climate.

How to fix water bills so conservation pays off

Fixed charges and delayed pricing signals can make water conservation hard to see on household bills, freelance writer Michael V. Haley argues. He proposes ways to redesign rates so saving water pays off.

Wisconsin must regulate crisis pregnancy centers to protect patients

Layne Donovan, a native Wisconsinite who works in reproductive health, highlights a proposal that would require crisis pregnancy centers to obtain consent before sharing client information. But she argues lawmakers should go further — cracking down on deceptive practices and protecting access to evidence-based care.

To curb alcohol harm, Wisconsin must rethink its drinking culture

Alcohol misuse is woven into the state’s history and identity, but its health consequences are widespread, writes Kayla Doege, a graduate student at University of Wisconsin-Whitewater’s Master of Social Work program. Treating addiction as a public health issue — not an individual failing — is the first step toward meaningful change, Doege writes.

No shortage of opinions: Readers fuel the WisConversation is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.