Cadillac’s electric revolution is well underway, and it got off to a fantastic start with the Lyriq. Launched in 2022, the model has become the best-selling luxury EV in America and now accounts for roughly 20% of Cadillac sales. It’s also introducing new people to the brand as it has an impressive conquest rate of 80%.

While the Lyriq was the tip of the spear, the battle is now raging on all fronts as the company’s electric lineup has grown to include five models. One of the latest is the 2026 Vistiq, which is the de facto successor to the XT6. It’s a huge leap forward, although it falls a little short of being a ‘baby’ Escalade.

QUICK FACTS

Iconiq Looks

Large and imposing, the Vistiq follows in the footsteps of the Lyriq and Escalade IQ as it adopts an illuminated Black Crystal Shield grille, flanked by split lighting units. They immediately tell onlookers this isn’t just any electric vehicle, it’s a Cadillac EV.

The boldness gives way to an understated design further back as the flanks have streamlined bodywork and flush-mounted door handles. They’re joined by a long, sloping roof that can be painted in contrasting black.

Michael Gauthier

More notably, there’s a Mondrian graphic on the third quarter glass, which could likely prove divisive. Cadillac says it’s there to provide a sense of motion as well as privacy for third-row occupants, but it’s not my cup of tea. On the bright side, the pattern doesn’t have much of an impact on the otherwise excellent visibility from inside.

While the window treatment is a bit garish, the sleek bodywork enables the crossover to have a drag coefficient of 0.29. That trails the Mercedes EQS SUV by a small margin, but it’s pretty impressive for a vehicle that measures 205.6 inches (5,222 mm) long, 86.7 inches (2,203 mm) wide, and 71 inches (1,804 mm) tall. For those wondering, that’s 7.1 inches (180 mm) longer than the XT6, but 18.7 inches (475 mm) shorter than the Escalade IQ.

121.8 inches (3,094 mm) separate the wheels, which are available in a variety of sizes and designs. 21-inchers come standard, although higher-end trims sport 22-inchers with 23-inch kicks being optional.

That brings us to the rear end, which is fairly conservative when compared to the more adventurous Lyriq. It sports split taillights as well as a power liftgate, which is activated by touching the Cadillac emblem.

A Beautiful Cabin With Three Roomy Rows

There’s a saying that ‘It’s what’s on the inside that counts’, and the Vistiq didn’t disappoint as our Premium Luxury tester was a sight to behold. The Phantom Blue seats immediately stand out thanks to their eye-catching color and premium design, which incorporates quilted accents as well as contrast piping.

The comfy chairs feature heating, ventilation, and a massage function that can be operated from either the door panel or the 8-inch command center. The seats also feature 8-way power adjustment as well as a memory function on both sides.

While the blue seats grab your attention, they’re not the only standout feature, as there’s beautiful Lumen open-pore wood trim as well as microfiber upholstery. Other highlights include stylized speaker grilles, metallic accents, and Cadillac-specific switchgear.

Michael Gauthier

It’s also impossible to ignore the curved 33-inch display that functions as a digital instrument cluster and infotainment system. It’s clean and bright, although not completely intuitive.

A prime example of this is hidden settings for the augmented reality heads-up display, which Cadillac made a big fuss about. The display was positioned out of my sightline, but I couldn’t find the menu to move it. It was only later that someone else discovered you had to swipe sideways on the far left section of the 33-inch display to get to a menu screen to access HUD settings.

That isn’t the only issue, as the steering wheel can block your view of the display. This isn’t much of a problem most of the time, but it can hide messages related to Super Cruise and automated lane changes.

The second-row captain’s chairs feel like first-class accommodations as they’re comfortable, supportive, and have a heating function as standard. They also slide and recline, making it easy to get situated.

Once settled in, passengers can fine-tune their environment on the 8-inch rear command center. This comes in handy as the Vistiq has a five-zone climate control system, so everyone can tailor settings to their liking.

The first two rows are covered by a dual-pane panoramic sunroof with a power-retractable sunshade. It’s accompanied by a fixed glass roof above the third row, which helps to make the rear seat feel open and airy.

Speaking of which, Cadillac officials called the rear seats a “no compromise” third row. That certainly seems to be the case as they have the same stylish Nouveauluxe upholstery as those up front. This is notable as some companies cut corners on the third row by using cheaper materials or by eschewing embellishments.

Rear seaters will find plenty of amenities, including padded armrests, cup holders, and air vents. They’re joined by USB-C charging ports and a decent amount of legroom. With the second row slid all the way back, this 6’2” scribe could be comfortable enough for a short trip in the third row. However, if second-row passengers slide their seats forward a bit, the third row becomes truly adult-friendly.

It’s also worth noting there’s plenty of headroom in back, while entry and egress is good. However, it wasn’t perfect as our tester had a glitchy release for the second-row passenger seat. This forced us to hit the button while also pushing the seat forward in order to get it to move.

When it comes to hauling cargo, the second- and third-row seats have a power folding function that opens up 80.2 cubic feet (2,271 liters) of space. There’s also 43 cubic feet (1,218 liters) behind the second row and 15.2 cubic feet (430 liters) behind the third row.

While many entry-level models skimp on equipment, the Vistiq Luxury boasts a long list of standard fare. This includes a heated power steering wheel as well as heated, ventilated, and massaging front seats. They’re joined by heated rear seats, a dual wireless smartphone charger, and a 23-speaker AKG Studio Audio system with Dolby Atmos. Buyers will also find alloy pedals, illuminated door sill plates, a rear camera mirror, ambient lighting, and Google built-in. The latter provides access to Google Assistant, Google Maps, and the Google Play store.

305 Miles Of Range And V-Series Performance

The heart of the Vistiq is a 102 kWh lithium-ion battery pack, which feeds a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system producing 615 hp (459 kW / 624 PS) and 650 lb-ft (880 Nm) of torque. The powertrain is shared with the 2026 Lyriq-V and enables a 0-60 mph (0-96 km/h) in 3.7 seconds as well as tow up to 5,000 lbs (2,268 kg).

Needless to say, the Vistiq is impressively quick, leaving the Mercedes EQS SUV in the dust. The model also outguns the similarly priced Volvo EX90, which offers up to 510 hp (380 kW / 517 PS) in Performance guise.

Despite the impressive performance, the Vistiq can go the distance thanks to a range of up to 305 miles (491 km). That’s 5 miles (8 km) less than the Volvo, 7 miles (11 km) less than the EQS SUV 450 4MATIC, and 24 miles (39 km) less than the Tesla Model X.

Speaking of Tesla, the Vistiq has a Combined Charging System (CCS) port, meaning you’ll need to use an NACS adapter at Superchargers. That’s unfortunate, but the crossover’s 190 kW DC fast-charging capability can deliver up to 80 miles (129 km) of range in approximately 10 minutes.

The model comes standard with a dual-level charge cord, which can connect to an “appliance-style, four-prong outlet” to get up to 20.9 miles (33.6 km) of range per hour. If all you have is a traditional household outlet, you’ll only get up to 3.7 miles (6 km) of range per hour.

However, the Vistiq also supports 11.5 and 19.2 kW Level 2 charging. The former provides about 29 miles (46.7 km) of range per hour, while the latter boosts that to nearly 47 miles (75.6 km).

On the topic of power, the Vistiq has a bidirectional charging capability. When paired with a $7,299 GM Energy V2H Bundle, the crossover can power your home during a blackout.

A Smooth Operator With Standard Super Cruise

If you’ve driven a Lyriq, the Vistiq should feel pretty familiar, hardly a surprise given the similarities between the two models. Both ride on the BEV3 Ultium platform and put an emphasis on comfort.

This pays dividends for drivers as the Vistiq has a refined ride quality that is silky smooth, but not disconnected. Credit goes to a multi-link front and five-link rear suspension with semi-active dampers. However, our Premium Luxury tester is notable for featuring an Air Ride Adaptive suspension, which was remarkably comfortable even on dirt roads and broken pavement.

Despite a relaxed attitude, the Vistiq can hustle on back roads. The three-row luxury crossover felt planted and secure when chucked into corners at speed, although its hefty curb weight becomes apparent when you try to make it dance. It’s not bad, but you can’t ignore the rules of physics.

Michael Gauthier

Given this is a family-friendly crossover, it’s not surprising that the electric power steering isn’t overly engaging. It’s direct and predictable, but even putting the crossover into Sport mode left me wishing for extra heft and a livelier experience.

Sticking with that theme, the Premium Luxury is notable for having an active rear steering system. It turns the rear wheels up to 3.5 degrees to improve maneuverability at low speeds and stability at high speeds. This is a welcome addition as it helps the Vistiq to drive much smaller than it is, especially in tight parking lots.

To give you some perspective, the model has a turning diameter as tight as 38.2 feet (11.6 meters). That’s half a foot (152 mm) less than the smaller XT5 and XT6.

Michael Gauthier

When it’s time to bring the action to a halt, customers can depend on a pair of capable brakes that measure 13.5 inches (343 mm) front and 13.6 inches (345 mm) rear. They’re certainly up to the task, but the range-topping Platinum trim is notable for adding six-piston Brembo front brakes measuring 16.1 inches (410 mm).

While we didn’t get a chance to try out the Brembos, the standard brakes work well and had no problem bringing the hefty crossover to a safe and predictable stop. However, they’re not the only way to slow the vehicle, as the Vistiq has a steering wheel-mounted Regen On Demand paddle. Pull it, and the regenerative brakes kick in to slow the luxury crossover. The model also offers a one-pedal driving mode, which is an acquired taste that may or may not be to your liking.

One of the most welcome things about the Vistiq is how quiet the interior can be. This can be chalked up to laminated glass, extensive sound deadening, and road noise cancellation technology. When traveling on dirt roads, the vehicle was impressively hushed, and the same was true at highway speeds.

Aiding the experience is a full complement of standard driver assistance systems. This includes an upgraded version of Super Cruise, which features more hands-on functionality, route-related lane changes, and automatic reengagement.

We’ll discuss the system a bit more in a later article, but the Vistiq also has Automatic Emergency Braking, Reverse Automatic Braking, and Rear Cross Traffic Braking. They’re joined by Forward Collision Alert, Blind Zone Steering Assist, Traffic Sign Recognition, an HD Surround Vision system, and OnStar.

A Solid, But Pricey Crossover Bound To Live In The Escalade’s Shadow

Cadillac appears to have another winner on their hands as the Vistiq offers an impressive blend of luxury, performance, and capability. It’s also a ‘proper’ three-row crossover, unlike the Tesla Model X and Mercedes EQS SUV. This alone helps the model to stand out, as there isn’t much direct competition besides the Volvo EX90.

Aside from filling a gap in the market, the Vistiq offers Blackwing levels of power and acceleration. Despite this, the crossover has a comfortable and refined ride as well as 305 miles (491 km) of range. While a few minor details detract from the experience, the model builds on the Lyriq and pushes the bar even higher.

Unfortunately, pricing is steep as the model starts at $77,395 before a $1,695 destination fee. Moving up to a Premium Luxury trim like our tester would set you back $93,590.

That’s a far cry from the 2025 XT6, which begins at $52,690 in AWD guise. However, the Vistiq undercuts the Volvo EX90 and is only a few thousand dollars more than the range-topping Hyundai Ioniq 9 Calligraphy. This makes it a pretty compelling three-row luxury EV, even if it has to live in the shadow of the Escalade IQ.

The Polestar 2 that was launched in 2019 showed the world that you didn’t need a Tesla to experience a well-rounded EV. But since then, the electric vehicle market has exploded, with new competitors pushing Polestar to either evolve or fall behind. Now, the larger Polestar 4 has arrived, and it could be a make-or-break moment for the Swedish-Chinese automaker, so it better deliver.

After spending a week with the Long Range Single Motor version, it’s clear that this model brings a noticeable improvement over the Polestar 2. It seamlessly blends cutting-edge technology with a level of European luxury that raises the bar for EVs in this segment.

So, what makes the Polestar 4 stand out? Let’s dive in.

QUICK FACTS

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Polestar is gearing up to launch the 4 in the United States later this quarter, but over in Australia, it’s been available since late last year. It goes directly against vehicles like the Kia EV6, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Tesla Model Y, and even the smaller BMW i4.

Australia’s EV market is becoming increasingly competitive, particularly thanks to the arrival of several new brands from China. But, like with the 2, Polestar is positioning itself as a slightly more premium offering, and yet, the Polestar 4 has actually been priced very well.

The Sweet Spot In The Range?

Local prices start at AU$78,500 (US$50,800), before on-road costs, or roughly AU$85,000 (US$55,000) with all fees paid. Perhaps the Polestar’s most obvious rival is the Kia EV6, as it best matches the sedan/SUV shape of the 4. It starts at AU$72,590 (US$47,000) before fees for the cheapest version and AU$79,590 (US$51,500) for the EV6 GT-Line RWD. However, the pre-facelift EV6 only has a 77.4 kWh battery, compared to the 100 kWh pack of the Polestar 4, and has a peak range of 528 km (328 miles), compared to the Polestar’s 620 km (385 miles).

We drove the Polestar 4 in Long Range Single Motor guise. It was also optioned with the AU$8,000 (US$5,200) Plus Pack, which is a must. This adds a thumping Harmon Kardon audio system, a 14-7-inch head-up display, a mesh material across the interior, pixel LED headlights, auto-dimming mirrors, and a touchscreen display for rear-seat passengers. It also adds 12-way adjustable front seats, power reclining rear seats, 3-zone climate control, a heated steering wheel, and support for 22 kW AC home charges.

While the Long Range Single Motor is the base model, it doesn’t feel like it.

Positioned between the rear wheels is a single electric motor delivering 272 hp (200 kW) and 253 lb-ft (343 Nm) of torque. This motor receives its juice from a 400-volt ,100 kWh lithium-ion battery pack, can hit 100 km/h (62 mph) in 7.1 seconds and tops out at 200 km/h (124 mph). Polestar also sells the 4 in Long Range Dual Motor guise, which adds a 200 kW motor to the front axle, resulting in a combined 400 kW (544 hp) and 506 lb-ft (686 Nm). However, the single motor version is probably the sweet spot in the line-up.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A Gorgeous Cabin – But Is It Too Minimalist?

The fit and finish of the Polestar 4’s cabin is superb. Not only is it way ahead of any Kia, Hyundai, or Tesla, but it feels more premium than even the BMW i4’s.

A 15.4-inch infotainment screen screams for your attention – but more on that later. The thing that immediately stands out is the quality of the materials used. The light grey MicroTech faux leather featured on our tester was plush and joined by equally soft and supple black leather. There’s hardly any hard black plastic in sight, and not even the lower extremities of the tunnel are plastic, but rather trimmed in soft carpet. Polestar also offers a Nappa leather upgrade to take things to the next level.

After you’re finished admiring the materials, the incredibly minimalist design becomes apparent. Polestar has clearly taken a leaf out of Tesla’s playbook on this one, eliminating virtually every button and switch and moving most controls to the touchscreen. While I can appreciate this decision from a design standpoint, it’s not the most practical solution.

Like in a a Tesla, you’ll need to enter the touchscreen to adjust the steering wheel and wing mirrors, when normal buttons for these would work perfectly well. All of the climate control settings are also done via the screen. The only physical dial used is a large volume knob sitting in the center of the console, plus Polestar has also moved to a column shifter. It’s all a little too minimalist for my liking – but to each, their own.

Read: 2026 Polestar 2 Looks The Same But Hides Major Interior Upgrade

Storage space is nothing sort of great, thanks to the large void beneath the floating center console. There’s also a sizeable area under the armrest and a large glove box, although it, too, is annoyingly operated through the touchscreen,. All Polestar 4s come equipped with sports seats that offer good support and are, at he same time, supremely comfortable. However, it would be nice if the headrests weren’t integrated into the backrests and could be adjusted independently; but that’s just me.

All Polestar 4s come standard with a sweeping panoramic glass roof and no rear window. This has been probably the major talking point of the EV since it was first revealed. I’m happy to report that after spending a few hours behind the wheel, I quickly adjusted to using the digital rearview mirror. However, I have heard complaints from people who need to wear prescription glasses.

Looking at the 4 from the outside, you could be excused for thinking the rear seats would be incredibly cramped. That’s not the case. By eliminating the rear window, Polestar has been able to extend the glass roof in line with the rear headrests. Rear space is palatial. I’m 6’2” and with the driver’s seat in my preferred position, I had four inches of legroom in the back and about half an inch of headroom to the glass. The Polestar 4’s 2,999 mm (118-inch) wheelbase is 1 mm shorter than the EV6’s, but the rear does feel bigger.

As mentioned, the Plus Pack also adds a touchscreen for the rear passengers, allowing for individual controls of the audio and climate control system. There’s a good amount of rear cargo space too, rated at 526 liters (18.5 cubic-feet) with the rear seats up and 1,536 liters (54.2 cubic-feet) with them folded down, as well as a 15-liter (0.5 cubic foot) frunk.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Back to the infotainment system. Like in the Polestar 2, the 4’s operating system uses Android Automotive. That means it includes native support for the Play Store, allowing you to download apps like Spotify, Google Maps, and Waze. It also supports wireless Apple CarPlay, but curiously, doesn’t support Android Auto from your phone. As such, diehard Android Auto users will need to get used to using the native system, which operates much like an Android-powered tablet.

The display is bright, crisp, and responsive. Polestar has also done a good job making the settings easy to understand and access, creating large tiles for individual settings that can be triggered on and off, making them easy to play with while on the move. As mentioned, all the climate settings are housed in the screen, too, but I quickly got used to them.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Is This The EV To Buy?

I had a revelation while testing the Polestar 4. For the first time, I could actually picture myself using an EV as my daily driver, and it made the Genesis GV70 I also had in my garage at the same time feel a bit archaic by comparison.

The 4 has also been well insulated, and while it doesn’t have double-pane glass, the windows are thicker than most cars. It blocks out almost all external noise at highway speeds, making it a serene place to spend time in.

There’s plenty of poke, too. While we only tested the rear-wheel drive model, it offers enough grunt, and that instantaneous response you’d expect from an EV. Performance-hungry enthusiasts would be well-advised to go for the dual motor, but for most buyers, this one should suffice. Its 0-60 mph (0-96 km/h) time of 7.1 seconds is on the slower side, especially when you consider that the Tesla Model Y RWD does it in just 5.4 seconds, albeit with a one-foot rollout, but still, it’s more than a second quicker.

On the other hand, Polestar has done a good job tuning the car’s ride. Single-motor variants have passive dampers, whereas the Dual Motor has adaptive suspension. Nevertheless, the former still rides well, although it does veer towards the firm side of comfortable. In an ideal world, I’d like it to be a little softer.

While the Polestar 4 is perhaps best suited to crunching highway miles, it also handles well, too. Like other Polestars (and Volvos), the steering has been well calibrated and offers three different settings for the weight and feel. However, like so many other electric steering systems, it’s often hard to know what the front wheels are doing, though it is admittedly quick and direct.

Weirdly, there are no selectable driving modes for this version of the Polestar 4, which is a shame. Three different settings for the brake regeneration can be selected, although these changes are made via the touchscreen. The Hyundai/Kia solution of adjusting brake regen through paddle shifters is a better one for on-the-fly changes.

As mentioned, the Polestar 4 has a 400-volt electrical architecture, whereas many rivals have 800-volt systems and, therefore, support faster charging speeds. Nevertheless, the 4 can charge at up to 200 kW, which is good for a 400-volt car, allowing the battery to be topped up from 10-80% in 30 minutes. Which is more than acceptable, but not really great.

Efficiency is good, but not great. In part due to the fact that this version of the Polestar 4 weighs a hefty 2,230 kg (4,916 lbs), we averaged 17.1 kWh/100 km during our time with it, whereas Model Ys can average in the 14 kWh/100 km range. Thankfully, the sizeable battery pack does mean hitting 600 km (373 miles) on a charge is achievable, which should be more than enough for most occasions.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Verdict

The Polestar 4 is one of the most well-rounded EVs I’ve driven recently. While some people have criticized its looks, everyone I’ve talked to has been impressed by the cabin. It’s the kind of interior you’d expect in a car with a price tag well into six figures, and the smooth, polished driving experience only adds to the appeal. It’s a noticeable upgrade over the Polestar 2 and definitely deserves a spot on the short list for anyone in the market for an EV.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

If you have been paying even half-attention to the electric vehicle scene lately, you know that competition is heating up fast, with new challengers trying to swipe the crown from established players. We recently spent time behind the wheel of the Seres 5, a fully electric SUV from China with premium aspirations. However, besides the main review, we wanted to see how well it stacks up against its biggest competitor, the Tesla Model Y, so we organized a quick head-to-head comparison between the two.

The Seres 5 may have launched in Europe in 2024, but the Chinese version has been around since 2019. Unfortunately, at the time we had the Seres in our hands, Tesla was not offering test drives of the new Juniper in Greece, only the pre-facelift Model Y. Still, it makes for an interesting comparison, even if we have to keep in mind the changes introduced with the updated Tesla.

More: We Compare The 2026 Tesla Model Y Side-By-Side With Its Predecessor

Both EVs share similar dimensions and come with dual electric motors, all-wheel drive capability, and large battery packs. The Tesla boasts 51 kilometers (32 miles) of extra WLTP range, but the Seres fights back with 193 hp more power. You can check out the detailed specs in the table below.

QUICK FACTS

Design: The Seres 5 Looks More Intriguing

Looks are subjective, sure, but a comparison would be incomplete without a design face-off. Beyond the exterior styling, we also factored in the cabin, where the Seres quietly pulls ahead.

Both models merge crossover and coupe cues, aiming for a sweet spot between aerodynamics and practicality. Parked side by side, the Tesla Model Y simply looks less interesting. Blame it partly on the fact that it resembles a bloated Model 3, although Tesla did address that with the recent mid-lifecycle update. It also does not help that Model Ys have become about as common as pigeons in a park.

That said, the rear end of the Model Y still looks cleaner and more cohesive than the Seres 5’s. While the Seres will not win any beauty pageants, it turns more heads and looks a bit more premium. It could definitely borrow a few styling updates from the related Aito M5, but even without them, it feels fresher than Tesla’s overfamiliar form.

Inside, most new EVs have taken a page from Tesla’s playbook: a big touchscreen, minimal physical controls, and a focus on being “modern” by removing everything people actually liked about buttons. The Seres 5 sticks to that formula but executes it better, with nicer materials, thoughtful color combinations, and a stylish center console. Plus, it offers a digital instrument cluster and a heads-up display, which make it easier for drivers migrating from more traditional cars.

However, while standard equipment of the Seres is pretty generous, Tesla’s tech and interface feel more modern, thanks to the continuous over-the-air software updates.

Practicality: The Tesla Model Y Prevails

While the Seres 5 offers a fancier interior, the Tesla wins when it comes to space for both people and cargo. Despite its sloping roofline, the Model Y offers more rear headroom and legroom, making it easier to climb in and out.

More: Xiaomi’s Electric SUV Is Bigger Than New Tesla Model Y And Has More Range

Cargo space is also firmly in Tesla’s favor. Officially, the Model Y can swallow 29 cubic feet (822 liters) in the rear boot and another 4.1 cubic feet (114 liters) in the frunk. Tesla’s habit of measuring up to the roof inflates those numbers a bit, but the advantage remains clear.

The Seres 5 has a boot capacity rating of 13 cubic feet (367 lt), with the frunk contributing another 2.4 cubic feet (67 lt). In reality, the difference with the Tesla is not that huge, but it is noticeable. Overall, I found the Model Y to be more suitable for family use, especially if you add the convenience of the longer driving range and the faster DC charging capabilities (250 kW compared to 100 kW).

Ride Comfort: The Seres 5 Feels Like An Electric Grand Tourer

Driving the two EVs back to back made it clear that the Seres 5 has the most comfortable and refined ride. The plush suspension absorbs road imperfections in a nicer way than the Tesla which can feel harsh in comparison.

The Seres also has a smoother power delivery – especially in the EV and Comfort modes – rounding up it’s friendly road manners. Furthermore, the cabin of the Seres is a bit more quiet, although we didn’t get the chance to test both vehicles on longer journeys on the highway.

Driving Dynamics: The Tesla Is Sportier And Feels Faster (But Isn’t)

While the majority of EV buyers are not interested in sporty driving manners, we had to include this segment allowing the differences in the character of the two models to shine.

On twisty roads, you’ll have more fun in the Tesla than in the Seres. It’s steering is a more direct, and the chassis setup feels sharper than your average family-oriented SUV or crossover. The softer and comfort-focused suspension of the Chinese EV results in more body roll compared to the more balanced setup of its well-established rival.

More: Only Four EV Brands Are Profitable And Two of Them Might Surprise You

Another thing I noticed, is that despite being less powerful and slightly slower on paper (0-62 mph in 5.o seconds compared to 4.2 seconds), the Tesla feels quicker than the Seres, providing snappier acceleration from standstill. Thanks to all these and a more rear-biased AWD setup, the Model Y is more eager to be pushed, thus being the better option for spirited driving.

Pricing: It’s Hard To Beat The Tesla

In Greece, where we tested these cars, the facelifted Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD starts at €52,990 ($58,100), or €43,990 ($48,200) with incentives. Inventory models of the outgoing version can be had for even less, starting at €48,940 ($53,600).

Meanwhile, the Seres 5 costs €57,500 ($63,000) including incentives. This means the Seres commands a €13,510 ($14,800) premium over a new Model Y Juniper, with similar specs. The gap widens further if you consider the older inventory units.

Verdict: Tesla Keeps Its Crown… For Now

The Seres 5 is an impressive EV, especially when you consider that it is the brand’s first production model, but Tesla’s best-seller is really hard to beat in its own game. Our comparison showed that the Seres has a more comfortable ride and a nicer interior, but the Tesla is more practical, has sharper driving dynamics, and is significantly more affordable.

Overall, the outgoing Tesla Model Y still feels like a well-rounded option for prospective EV buyers. However, the competitive pricing of the updated Model Y Juniper makes it a no-brained, having corrected many of it’s predecessor’s flaws.

More: Tesla’s Q1 Deliveries Crash Harder Than Wall Street Expected

We’ll be eager to test more Tesla Model Y rivals from China in the future, although the biggest threat to the EV’s success appears to the global backslash against the company’s CEO, Elon Musk. This appears to be the main reason behind a significant decline in Tesla sales in Europe, with EV buyers turning their backs to the once-dominant brand.

Photos: Thanos Pappas for CarScoops

If you’re reading this in the West, you’re probably scratching your head over the Riddara name. And that’s okay, because you’re not alone. This is Geely’s “lifestyle utility brand”, marketed as Radar in China. In case you’re wondering, no, the name wasn’t picked by a blindfolded intern throwing darts at a whiteboard. They were forced to change the name due to a copyright conflict in some markets.

By now, almost everyone is aware that Geely is an automotive behemoth. In addition to its home-grown Geely Auto, Lynk & Co, and Zeekr offerings, it also has Volvo, Polestar, Lotus, Proton, and Smart under its wing. Riddara/Radar then is just another feather in its, rather large, cap.

Read: China’s Radar RD6 Is The Latest Electric Pickup To Beat Tesla Cybertruck To Market

Now that I’ve got you up to speed, you’ll no doubt wonder where exactly this fits in. Well, it comes as no surprise that this is an EV, with China clearly forging ahead in that space. However, while the Cybertruck, F-150 Lightning, and Rivian R1T may dominate the full-size EV pickup market in the US, there’s not much to speak of in the form of a smaller, Toyota Hilux-sized offering.

Measuring 5,260 mm x 1900 x 1880, the RD6 is a compact pickup by American standards. But here in the East, it’s considered a substantially sized truck, with markets in Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia lapping up utes like this. The RD6 was designed from the outset to be an EV, meaning there are fewer compromises than one might expect.

QUICK FACTS

Exterior: A Pickup for People Who Don’t Want to Yell About It

Those who love their pickup trucks big, brash, and unapologetic will be disappointed with the exterior of the RD6. It has 225 mm of ground clearance and looks just a tad too low to the ground for comfort, but it avoids looking jacked up on steroids, and this slightly car-like stance lends itself to its market positioning. More on that later.

But its softer lines up front shout EV in a way that most pickups, electric or otherwise, don’t. The top half of the nose opts for the traditional battery-powered, grille-less look, opting for a textured plastic panel. There are fake vents towards the lower half, while a clamshell-like hood masks a rather useful frunk with a capacity of 70 liters.

The door mirrors, rather than connecting at the quarter glass, appear to be mounted on stalks. tHEe side profile isn’t totally flat, with a bit of flame surfacing deployed along with swollen arches. This makes our test car look a bit underwhelming, but the large profile sidewall definitely lends itself to ride comfort.

Overall, the Riddara RD6 doesn’t really stand out in traffic. It doesn’t follow the trend of ginormous grilles and towering stances we see on many new pickups keen to capture those macho vibes. Even the newly launched BYD Shark manages to mimic the class’ imposing nature with a much more off-road-centered approach.

Finally, the rear bed measures 1,525 mm long, 1,450 mm wide, and 540 mm high. It’s perfectly adequate but lacks some of the frills you may want, such as power outlets, although better-specced models come with V2L capabilities.

The tailgate release is electric, but aside from the electronic catch, the hinge, the door itself, and the mechanism all feel heavy and sturdy enough to win over the old-school pickup collective. I mention this because with some of the tech-showcasing EVs that have been coming out of China, you’d perhaps expect some over complicated electrically-lowering, damped, and soft-closing tailgate. The RD6 offers just a good old clunky hinged mechanism.

Interior: A Cozy Place, But Don’t Get Too Comfortable

If the exterior is soft, the interior is more so. The entry-level model we got our hands on was fairly basic, with high grades getting nicer materials on the dash and door tops, as well as a larger central screen. The interior isn’t quite hose-down bargain-basement though, with a nice, supposedly, leather-wrapped steering wheel, an electric driver’s seat, and a PM 2.5 air filtration system.

The controls are decently damped with some metal-effect knurling on things like the light switches and multifunction controls on the steering wheel. The plastic of the central console is a little lower rent than the rest of the interior, but there’s a Land Rover-like rotary knob to control Geely’s version of Terrain Response. We couldn’t test it off-road on our brief test drive, but we hope to get our hands on one of the more premium 4WD models for an extended test in the coming months.

See Also: BYD Shark PHEV Pickup Debuts In Mexico, Combines 430+ HP With A Karaoke Machine

The 12.3-inch central screen runs off some form of Android and is quick to respond to inputs. The top-spec Horizon 4×4 gets a usefully bigger 14.6-inch screen. Meanwhile, the drive is presented with a 10.2-inch LCD screen which is clear under various light conditions.

The voice assistant is slow to react, with a good 10–15 seconds of lag between saying a command and the system gathering its thoughts together. But it at least understands basic commands from a wide range of accents and doesn’t have you repeating them line after line.

The rear seats are pleasant, in line with the RD6’s positioning. The low beltline means that even children should be able to see the world fairly unhindered, and there are rear vents for the air conditioning. There’s a useful storage compartment under the rear bench, too, although the angle of the seat backs is a little too upright, which may cause some complaints on longer excursions.

Photos Sam Smith/Carscoops

How Does It Drive? In a Word, Comfortably

The overall feeling when you’re inside is that the Riddara RD6 knocks on the door of SUVs and CUVs, rather than that of full-on pickups like the Ranger. Pickups have come a long way from their utilitarian roots, and it’s fair to say that they’re closer to your traditional car than ever. But even the best examples can have their agricultural moments.

The Riddara RD6 negates all of that, and not just because it’s silent due to it being an EV. And that does catch you off guard. You expect any vehicle with this body shape to be a little rough and tumble behind the wheel, but the RD6 displays a level of refinement beyond the virtue of its drivetrain having few moving parts.

The steering is light, not so much that it feels disconnected from the wheels, but more so than you’d expect from an off-roader. Our tested model with the 100 kW (134 hp0 motor is far from rapid, though, with a 0–62 mph (0-100 km/h) time of 10.4 seconds. This was a market decision – our test unit was specced specifically for Sri Lanka, a country notorious for its punishing taxes on high-powered motors. In contrast, other nations get the option of a model with a combined power of 310 kW (416 HP) with a blistering 0-60 mph (0-96 km/h) sprint in 4.5 seconds.

Top speed is limited to 185 km/h (115 mph), but even at a decent rate of knots the cabin remains hushed, with tire noise being the most prevalent.

The single most significant factor is its comfort – you can mount a curb and it feels second nature. Over expansion joints and rough roads, the ride remains composed and well insulated. While good, this also signals that the RD6 isn’t a “proper” off-roader, as it’s built on a monocoque frame rather than a ladder chassis. Now, if you’re a tradesman looking to do some serious carrying, this will likely not sit well, nor will the coil-sprung rear end. However, as a family runabout with some added practicality, the RD6 makes perfect sense.

And to be honest, it’s hard to see hardcore users giving up their ICE-powered trucks just yet. Better for Riddara to capture passenger-focused buyers who are looking for refinement first than a “power” user who’s less likely to switch just yet.

The EV Part: A Little Range, But It’ll Do

Our tester was the entry-level two-wheel drive “Air” model with a 63kwh battery and 100 kW motor with 385 Nm of torque. As we only had the truck for a day, we couldn’t do a real-world test on the claimed range, but on the NEDC standard, the RD6 we drove is rated at 373 km (231 miles). That’s not great. Opt for the 73 kWh battery of the “Pro” and you’ll get a substantially improved 461km (286 miles).

The 4WD “Horizon” sports the same 73 kWh battery, but an added motor brings the torque up to 595 Nm. However, the range drops to 424 km (263 miles), as does the 0–62 mph time, which is rated at 10.9 seconds.

The Riddara RD6 can reportedly be DC fast-charged from 30 to 80 percent in 48 minutes, whereas the standard wall-mounted home charger included in the purchase will take 7.8 hours at 6.6 kW for the 63 KWh battery and 9.3 hours for the 73 kWh battery.

Final Thoughts

The Riddara RD6, then, is a surprisingly refined offering from Geely. It does the basics well but doesn’t quite challenge the established range of small pickups in the way you may expect. Instead, it offers itself as a good alternative to first-time pickup buyers or those wanting to experience an electrified alternative to an SUV,

It’s also a brand that aims to make strides in the future. With Geely’s backing and the evident tech sharing across the brands, Riddara could well be an off-road establishment challenger.

Photos Sam Smith/Carscoops

Europeans are notoriously loyal to their automotive brands, especially when it comes to premium options. However, that hasn’t stopped Seres, a fresh-faced Chinese automaker, from dipping its toes into the European market with a fully electric SUV. We recently spent a week behind the wheel of the Seres 5 to see what it has to offer prospective buyers.

The Seres 5 made its European debut in 2023, with a slow rollout across the continent through 2024. The model mirrors the design of the Chinese version that has been around since 2019, albeit with a slightly longer body. In 2022, Seres teamed up with Huawei to launch the Aito M5, a revamped version, but the global-spec Seres 5 we tested hasn’t yet gotten the same redesign.

Seres, formerly known as SF Motors, may be rooted in China, but it has a Silicon Valley presence and once had grand ambitions of selling cars in the U.S. These plans, however, appear to have been quietly shelved as the company shifts its focus to Europe, South America, and the Middle East.

QUICK FACTS

Smooth and Curvy Lines

Unlike many new Chinese car brands that lean heavily on copying their established competitors (we’re looking at you, other automakers), Seres has made an attempt to bring something new to the table. Sure, eagle-eyed car nerds might spot a few design cues reminiscent of other cars—like the DS-style curvy daytime running lights or a subtle nod to the Porsche Macan in the rear end—but for the most part, the Seres 5 stands on its own.

The standout feature of the aerodynamic bodywork is the leaf-shaped greenhouse, highlighted by chrome accents. The EV’s silhouette blurs the lines between traditional and coupe-style SUVs, emphasizing the sculpted rear shoulders. The standard 21-inch alloy wheels, paired with red brake calipers, set a sporty tone, reinforcing that the Seres 5 is more of a GT crossover than an adventurous SUV.

More: Xiaomi President Confirms Global EV Expansion Coming Soon

During my time behind the wheel of the Seres 5, I noticed it attracted more attention than your average EV, turning plenty of heads—though that might also be because it’s a fresh new offering sparking curiosity. However, despite its recent arrival in Europe, the design is starting to feel outdated compared to newer competitors.

With a length of 4,710 mm (185 inches), the Seres 5 is a direct competitor to the Tesla Model Y, although the brand would prefer to position it against similarly-sized premium SUVs such as the BMW iX3, Mercedes GLC, and Audi Q6 E-tron.

The Cabin Is A Nice Place To Be

Step inside and you’re greeted by premium materials including the Nappa leather upholstery and the wood inserts. The perceived quality and the fit and finish is better than you would expect from a new brand, even though it doesn’t reach the levels of high-end models from the likes of BMW and Genesis. The standard equipment is quite generous and includes a panoramic glass roof and comfortable seats with heating, ventilation, massage, and memory functions.

The floating center console is a nice touch, incorporating a proper gear lever, storage compartments, and two wireless charging pads with cooling. The centerpiece is a Tesla-like 15.6-inch touchscreen, which is home to all of the vehicle’s functions.

While the infotainment system’s interface is fairly easy to use, it’s missing physical controls for key functions like A/C and drive modes—making it occasionally frustrating to navigate on the fly. Sure, there are buttons on the steering wheel for media and calls, but the ADAS stalk feels a bit like something from a previous generation.

At first, it seems that your smartphone can only connect to the system via Bluetooth. However, we later learned that the vehicle comes pre-installed with a third-party app, adding wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay compatibility.

The digital instrument cluster and head-up display give you all the essential info, but their graphics could use a refresh—they only change when you’re in the Race driving mode. On a positive note, the infotainment screen features sharp wallpapers and quirky widgets like “Take A Break” and “Camping Mode,” so at least you’ll have something to occupy your mind when the car is parked. Unfortunately, I was let down by the audio system—while the bass and volume are fine, the clarity just doesn’t live up to expectations.

More: We Compare The 2026 Tesla Model Y Side-By-Side With Its Predecessor

Rear passengers are treated with the same level of quality as the ones in the front seats, having access to their own USB ports, climate vents, seat back net pockets, and a central armrest with cupholders and a storage cubby. Once you get past the weird shape of the rear doors, there is more than enough headroom for tall individuals. Rear legroom is adequate, but not as generous as in some other models in the category.

The boot space is where things get a little tight at 367 liters (13 cubic feet) in the five-seater configuration and an additional 67 liters (2.4 cubic feet) in the trunk. Then there’s the tailgate: to be honest, I spent several minutes trying to figure out how to open it. It turns out that the dedicated button is mounted on the rear windscreen wiper. Owners will know, but it’s not convenient having to explain this to every single one of your passengers when they want to put something at the back, although their reactions should be interesting.

Driving Impressions: An Electric Grand Tourer

Even after the first minutes of driving the Seres 5, I was impressed with the high levels of comfort, as the suspension smoothed out the bumps, cracks, and potholes of the roads. The chassis feels sturdy and the sound insulation is on par with premium rivals, making the cabin a sanctuary. here’s just one small issue: the faint hiss from the electric motor at low speeds, which, while minor, is noticeable if you’re paying attention.

Despite the intimidating figures which would put any ’90s supercar to shame, the Seres 5 proved to be friendly behind the wheel. This is especially evident in Eco mode, which prioritizes efficiency over performance. Comfort mode gives access to more grunt and is perfect for daily use, while Sport and Race unleash the full 577 hp (430 kW / 585 PS) and 940 Nm (693 lb-ft) of torque.

Even in the sportiest settings, the Seres 5 remains composed, offering smooth power delivery and minimal wheel spin when you floor it from a standstill. Acceleration is impressive, especially when you’re cruising between 60-140 km/h (37-87 mph), making highway overtakes feel effortless. This is where the Seres 5 excels as a long-distance cruiser.

More: Xpeng’s New G6 Can Add 280 Miles Of Range In Just 10 Minutes

The steering is notably light by default, making it ideal for city driving, but less suited for spirited handling. Luckily, there’s a setting that adds weight to the steering, though it requires disabling some lane-keeping ADAS features first, and it still feels artificial. Overall, while the Seres 5 packs plenty of power and the suspension manages its weight well, it’s clear that this vehicle wasn’t built for chasing hot hatches on winding roads.

Range And Charging

In terms of range, you can expect about 400 km (250 miles) from the 80 kWh lithium iron phosphate battery pack if you’re driving sensibly. The most efficient drivers might push closer to the WLTP estimate of 483 km (300 miles), but it’s tough to hold back when 577 hp is tempting you with every press of the accelerator. That said, the Seres 5’s range is comparable to the outgoing Tesla Model Y Performance, which was rated for 280 miles in the US, though most real-world drivers saw closer to 240-260 miles.

The battery can charge from 30% to 80% in 25 minutes using a 100 kW DC charger. While that’s decent, it’s not as fast as some rival EVs from the Hyundai Group or other Chinese automakers. It’s also worth noting that while the BEV is the only option available in Europe, buyers in China have the option of a range-extender powertrain, which is better suited for hypermiling.

Pricing And Rivals

Unlike other Chinese automakers like BYD, which target price-conscious buyers, Seres has positioned its only EV offering closer to European pricing. In Greece, where we tested it, the Seres 5 is priced at €57,500 (equal to $62,500) with local EV subsidies. In Germany, where availability is more limited, the price jumps to €64,990 ($70,700). These figures apply to the full-spec AWD trim, which is currently the only option available in Europe.

As is typical with a new brand like Seres, depreciation is something potential buyers should keep in mind. Used 2024 models with very low mileage can already be found for as little as €40,000 ($43,700)—not great for the original owners, but a pretty sweet deal for anyone looking for a one-year-old EV with plenty of performance.

Review: The Facelifted Kia EV6 Is Better Than Ever, But We’d Wait For The EV5

When it comes to competition, the Seres 5 faces stiff challenges. The Tesla Model Y, for example, offers a comparable AWD Long Range trim starting at €43,990 ($47,900) in Greece. The facelifted Kia EV6 GT AWD is also a solid contender at €56,990 ($62,000).

There are a few premium offerings in the same price range, but they tend to be less powerful in their base configurations. For example, the outgoing BMW iX3 (not offered in the US) starts at €52,950 ($57,600) here in Greece, the Lexus RZ450e is priced at €58,700 ($63,900), and the newer Audi Q6 E-tron kicks off at a considerably higher €67,980 ($73,900). It will be interesting to see how the prices of the upcoming BMW iX3 Neue Klasse and the fully electric successor to the Mercedes-Benz GLC compare.

Verdict

The all-electric Seres 5 offers a comfortable ride, plenty of power, and the kind of premium feel you’d expect from a more established brand. Despite being a newcomer, it has a distinctive design and a high-quality interior, packed with standard features. However, it does fall short in a few key areas, including the absence of physical controls for essential functions, and some design elements that feel a bit dated.

The biggest hurdle for the Seres 5, however, is the intense competition it faces from well-established brands that already have loyal customer bases. On top of that, it lacks both the brand prestige of its European and Japanese rivals and the price advantage typically associated with Chinese models—one of the main selling points for many buyers.

If Seres can manage to lower the price, it might be worth considering introducing the Chinese-market range-extender version of the 5 in Europe, which could give the car a much-needed edge.

Photos: Thanos Pappas for CarScoops

If there’s one automaker that’s decided to go all-in on electric vehicles—and do it quickly—it’s Kia. Few legacy brands have cranked out as many notable EVs in such short order, and Kia’s made it clear they’re not just dabbling. The company’s goal is to sell 1.6 million EVs per year by 2030, and depending on your location, there’s already a variety of sleek, electrified options to choose from.

The EV6 was the first of a new generation of electric vehicles from Kia and quickly proved itself to be a solid Tesla rival. It’s since followed it up with the larger seven-seat EV9, and, more recently, the smaller EV3 and EV5. Of that bunch, the EV5 may turn out to be the most important.

Why? Because while the EV6 is a solid product, it doesn’t follow the traditional SUV formula—it has a more coupe-like styling that puts it somewhere between a crossover and a hatchback. That’s where the EV5 comes in. It’s a more conventionally shaped, all-electric compact SUV, and it undercuts the best-selling Tesla Model Y on price in many markets. To find out how it performs day to day, we spent a week living with the entry-level EV5 Air Standard Range model.

QUICK FACTS

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Bargain Price

Perhaps the most important thing about the new EV5 is its price. For many years, legacy brands couldn’t compete with Tesla on that front. Then, new competitors from China started to undercut Tesla’s offerings. The EV5 has done the same thing.

In Australia, prices for the EV5 start at AU$56,770 (~$33,500), including all on-road costs. That makes it significantly cheaper than the entry-level Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive, which carries a AU$64,347 (~$40,300) tag. This also means the EV5 is far cheaper than the EV6, which is priced from AU$78,564 (~$49,200). Indeed, even the flagship EV5 GT-Line, starting at AU$75,990 (~$43,600) is cheaper than the base EV6. It seems inevitable that the EV5 will poach sales from its sibling.

Unfortunately, though, Kia has no plans to sell the EV5 in the United States.

FWD And AWD Options

Three different powertrain configurations are available. The base model, which we tested, has an electric motor at the front axle, rated at 215 hp (160 kW) and 229 lb-ft (310 Nm) of torque. This motor receives its juice from a 64.2 kWh lithium-iron-phosphate battery and has a claimed WLTP driving range of 400 km (249 miles).

Review: 2025 Kia EV3 Makes Everything We Love About The EV9 More Affordable

To put that into perspective, the cheapest Model Y has a quoted range of 466 km (290 miles). However, Kia buyers who aren’t satisfied with 400 km (249 miles) of range can opt for the 2WD Long Range version, which retains the same 215 hp (160 kW) motor, but uses a large 88.1 kWh battery. This model boosts the range to 555 km (345 miles), and yet, at AU$63,990 (~$40,100), it’s still cheaper than the Tesla.

The EV5 is also sold in Earth AWD Long Range and GT-Line AWD Long Range versions. This models add a 94 hp (70 kW) and 125 lb-ft (170 Nm) motor to the rear axle, resulting in a combined 308 hp (230 kW) and 354 lb-ft (480 Nm). They have the same 88.1 kWh pack, but the range drops to 500 km (311 miles) for the Earth and 470 km (292 miles) for the GT-Line. On paper, then, the EV5 sounds like the perfect electric family SUV.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Basic Interior, But Good Tech

Stepping into the EV5 for the first time, there’s no mistaking that this is a base model. But, for most, it will be more than adequate.

Sharp lines and edgy surfaces dominate the design of the cabin. This is most apparent with the dashboard itself, which is very striking. Unfortunately, almost the entire dash is made from hard black plastic, with not a square inch of soft-touch material in sight. It’s a similar story with the door panels. Other than the small arm rests and material near the door handles, the entire door is hard black plastic.

Fortunately, the seats feel a little more premium, neatly combining soft leather inserts and cloth accents. They’re soft, supple, and hugely supportive. Nice headrests, similar to those found in the EV9, are also featured.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Several other parts have been borrowed from the EV9, including the four-spoke steering wheel and the same volume slider and physical switches for the fan speed and temperature control. All EV5 models also come standard with a panoramic display, combining a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster and a 12.3-inch infotainment screen. There’s also a 5-inch screen for the climate control between those two 12-inch displays.

More: Check Out The New Kia EV5 From Every Angle As Global Exports Begin

The center console of the EV5 is one of its biggest talking points. Rather than installing a normal item, Kia has extended the material from the front passenger seat across the center of the cabin, making it look like there are three seats up front. There’s then a large armrest and some open storage compartments lower down in the console. It looks pretty cool but has no advantage over a normal console. In fact, it’s worse, as there’s no covered storage area. Not even the chunky armrest opens up to provide any storage.

Fortunately, space at the front is ample and both screens work well, while Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are supported. The second row also offers heaps of space. Unlike the EV6 which has a sedan-crossover body style limiting headroom, the EV5 stands much taller, benefiting rear passengers. It’s also a lot roomier than a Model Y. I’m 6’2” and I had roughly 2 inches of headroom and 4 inches of legroom in the back with the driver’s seat in my preferred position. That means the EV5 is plenty big enough for families. There are also individual air vents in the pillars and USB-C ports on the back of both front seats.

The positives don’t stop there. Much like Honda’s ‘Magic Seats,’ the backrests of the EV5’s rear seats are hinged to the bases, allowing them to be folded down perfectly flat. There’s plenty of carrying capacity at the rear, too, with a rated 513 liters (18.1 cubic-feet) of cargo capacity with the rear seats up.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A Good Daily For The Family

As the EV5 represents a new era of affordable electric vehicles from Kia, it perhaps should come as no surprise that it doesn’t quite feel as polished as the EV6. Even still, it’s pretty good.

Compared to a Sportage, the EV5 rides noticeably firmer. It’s not uncommon for EVs to ride more harshly than their ICE rivals, and weighing in at 1,910 kg (4,210 lbs), the base EV6 is 402 kg (886 lbs) heavier than the entry-level Sportage. As a result, it can feel a little bumpy and unsettled across changing road surfaces.

Those who place an emphasis on driving experience should also be aware that the front-wheel drive EV5 has hot hatch levels of torque steer, even at 70% throttle. With 215 hp (160 kW) and 229 lb-ft (310 Nm), it’s not particularly powerful, but that grunt does tug at the wheel when accelerating in a straight line or while cornering. But, for most drivers, who will rarely ever press the throttle more than 50%, it’s a non-issue.

In wet conditions, the EV5 really struggles to put its power to the ground. Just look at the throttle the wrong way, and the traction control system will quickly cut power, trying to stick the tires to the pavement. Turn off the traction control and the EV5 will furiously spin up its inside front wheel while exiting corners, leaving a thick black line in your wake. The choice of tires is partly to blame for this. They are Nexen Roadian GTXs that simply aren’t up to the task.

Read: US Won’t Get The Kia EV5, But The K5 Might Stick Around For Longer

Overall, this is not an EV that wants to be driven in an aggressive manner. Instead, it responds much better to soft and smooth inputs and remains well-insulated from outside noise even at highway speeds. The steering is light and direct, and as with other EVs from Hyundai and Kia, the braking is excellent. In fact, it’s impossible to detect when the mechanical brakes take over from the regenerative ones.

The level of regen can be adjusted with the paddles behind the steering wheel, and there is a one-pedal driving mode that works brilliantly. From behind the wheel, the EV5 does feel quite big, even though it’s almost exactly the same size as a Sportage, but it remains easy to place on the road.

The EV5 needs roughly 8.5 seconds to hit 100 km/h (62 mph) in this guise, which feels more than adequate.

Unlike most other Hyundai and Kia EVs, the EV5 does not use the group’s E-GMP platform and instead, is underpinned by the cheaper N3 eK 400-volt system. This means it’s capped at 140 kW peak charging speeds, and thus needs 36 minutes to charge from 10-80%. During our time with the EV5, we averaged 17.6 kWh/100 km, and depending on how you drive, eking 249 miles (400 km) out of the battery is definitely achievable.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Verdict

As a family SUV, the EV5 feels mostly well-resolved. In this base form, it does not have the same dynamic prowess as the EV6, nor even the much larger EV9 GT-Line, and there are areas of the cabin where it’s clear Kia has tried to save some money. However, at this price point, the EV5 doesn’t really have any compelling rivals that aren’t from China. Even the uninspired Toyota bZ4X is roughly AU$10,000 (~$6,200) more expensive.

We’ve yet to drive the new Model Y, but if the old model is anything to go by, I suspect the new one will ride better and be more enjoyable to drive than the EV5. However, the cabin of the Kia is far more expansive, and for most family buyers, that’ll be more important than having fun behind the wheel.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops