Electric vehicles make up just over 8 percent of new car sales in Australia, so they are hardly dominant. Yet the competitive noise has increased dramatically in recent years, thanks largely to a surge of new Chinese brands. Hyundai’s counterpunch is the Elexio, its latest EV and one aimed squarely at that fast-growing crowd.

The Elexio is unlike any other electric Hyundai so far. Crucially, it was not developed entirely in-house, but rather brought to life through its joint venture partnership with BAIC Motors.

Review: The 2026 Ioniq 9 Calligraphy’s Biggest Threat Is Hyundai Itself

This means it is built in China, tapping into the country’s vast manufacturing scale and efficiency, paired with the engineering experience and brand weight of a legacy player like Hyundai. When it was revealed last year, it looked set to remain a China-only model. Instead, it has now landed in Australia, and we were among the first to get behind the wheel earlier this month.

QUICK FACTS

According to Hyundai, the Elexio has been designed to neatly slot between the Kona EV and Ioniq 5 in its line-up, serving as an all-electric alternative to the Hyundai Tucson. It’s Hyundai’s answer to popular competitors like the Tesla Model Y, Kia EV5, BYD Sealion 7, and Xpeng G6, and this is reflected in the price.

Can It Compete On Price?

Hyundai Australia

Two versions will be offered: the base Elexio and the flagship Elexio Elite. Prices for the base version will start at AU$58,990 (US$41,900) before on-road costs, while the Elite will be priced from AU$61,990 (US$44,000). However, the Elite will be available for AU$59,990 (US$42,600), including all on-road costs, in a limited-time deal running until the end of March.

Hyundai is predicting big things for the Elexio and expects it to be its best-selling EV in Australia. Achieving this won’t be easy. The Kia EV6 undercuts the Elexio at AU$56,770 (US$40,300), the Tesla Model Y Premium is available from AU$58,900 (US$41,800), and the BYD Sealion 7 Premium is available from AU$54,990 (US$39,000). The superb Zeekr 7X also undercuts it at AU$57,900 (US$41,100).

Big Battery, Modest Charging Speeds

So, what do you get for your money in the world of the Elexio? Like Hyundai’s Ioniq models, and unlike the Kia EV5, the Chinese-built Elexio uses the familiar E-GMP platform. However, it doesn’t have an 800-volt architecture like the Ioniqs, instead using a 400-volt system.

With this in mind, charging the battery pack 10-80 percent on a 150 kW charger, with peak speeds in the mid-120s, will take 38 minutes. This is slightly slower than the Kia EV5, which takes 36 minutes, but whereas it has a compact 64.2 kWh battery, the Hyundai has a much larger and more practical 88.1 kWh unit.

This battery powers a front-mounted electric motor with 160 kW (215 hp) and 310 Nm (236 lb-ft). Hyundai quotes a combined efficiency of 18.2 kWh/100 km, which is okay, but certainly not class-leading.

A Digital-First Cabin

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

We only sampled the Elexio in flagship Elite trim, so first impressions came fully loaded. Stepping into the cabin for the first time, it is immediately clear this is not your typical Hyundai interior.

Dominating the interior is a massive widescreen 27-inch display, encompassing both the central infotainment display and a display for the passenger. This screen houses Hyundai’s new Connect-C infotainment system and runs on Android Automotive with a powerful Snapdragon 8295 processor and Unreal 3D graphics engine.

While there are several cars on sale in China with a similar passenger and infotainment screen, this is one of the first implementations of a display like this in a Western market. It looks great, providing excellent colors, clarity, and response. However, it’s not particularly practical to use, especially when you’re driving.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

I am quite tall with long arms, yet adjusting the climate controls or digging into vehicle settings on the move meant leaning forward and stretching almost to the limit. It should not feel like a light workout just to change the temperature. The more traditional screens in other current Hyundai models are much easier to reach, as are the tablet-like displays found in many of the Elexio’s rivals.

Read: Hyundai’s New EV Costs Over Twice As Much In Australia As In China

On the plus side, the new Connect-C system is good and is far more modern than Hyundai’s outgoing software. It has a much smartphone-like layout with convenient shortcuts on the driver’s side.

In a Hyundai first, a traditional gauge cluster has been replaced by a head-up display. In photos, it doesn’t look like a HUD at all, but rather a physical cluster positioned at the base of the windshield. In reality, it is a true head-up display, albeit it projects onto a small black area of the windshield, providing better contrast than HUDs that project onto normal glass.

The obvious downside of this is that if you chip or crack the windshield, you probably won’t be able to buy a generic HUD-compatible replacement, but rather need one from Hyundai with this black element.

Quality And Space

Disappointingly, neither Elexio model has a panoramic glass roof, which is common in electric SUVs at this price point, nor a frunk, even though there’s plenty of space for one.

How Does It Drive?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Driving the Elexio revealed that it is a solid performer, and it does some things well. However, it fails to stand out from the competition and could benefit from some tweaks to lift it to a new level.

As any EV should, the Elexio’s powertrain is smooth and quiet, providing more than enough grunt for everyday driving duties, whether that be in urban settings or on the highway.

Review: Why Kia’s New EV5 SUV Makes More Sense Than A Model Y

With 160 kW (215 hp) and 310 Nm (236 lb-ft), the Elexio has exactly the same power as the front-wheel drive Kia EV5. Crucially, it doesn’t suffer from the same horrible torque steer that the EV5 does. In fact, there’s no torque steer whatsoever, which is a great thing. However, like the EV5, the Elexio does love to spin up its inside front wheel should you get greedy with the throttle and play around with the traction control.

Efficiency is not so good. After several stints behind the wheel of the Elexio, we averaged 19.5 kWh/100 km, which is quite poor, particularly given that we averaged 20.5 kWh/100 km in the Sealion 7 Performance, and it has an extra 230 kW (308 hp) and 380 Nm (280 lb-ft) of torque.

Like other Hyundai and Kia EVs, the Elexio has paddle shifters behind the steering wheel to adjust the level of brake regeneration, which is something every EV should have. I spent most of my time in the one pedal i-Pedal mode, with it bringing the SUV to a smooth and predictable stop every time. The transition between the mechanical brakes and the regen is also imperceptible, so kudos to Hyundai for that.

The brand says that, like most of the cars it sells in Australia, the Elexio has been specifically tuned for local roads by teams of engineers from South Korea. I was pleasantly surprised with the Elexio’s ride, finding it to be comfortable and softer than many other EVs, which can be too firm and harsh over bumps.

Software Still Finding Its Feet

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

In addition to tweaking the suspension for Australia, Hyundai insinuated during a press briefing that the Elexio’s advanced driver assistance system have also been set up for local conditions. Despite this, further refinements are needed.

During long highway jaunts, there were several instances when the lane-keeping assist and lane-centering functions failed to recognize clearly-marked lines, causing it to slowly drift into adjacent lanes. In addition, I experienced some slow ping-ponging between lane markings. This is odd as the dozens of other Hyundai and Kia models I’ve tested in recent years all have great lane-keeping systems, keeping you locked in the center of the lane on well-marked highways.

Review: 2026 Zeekr 7X Performance Is Proof That Tesla Isn’t The Benchmark Anymore

In addition, there was an instance where I had the adaptive cruise control enabled on a 100 km/h (62 mph) country road when suddenly, the Elexio suddenly braked to 75 km/h (47 mph) despite there being no object or car in front of me. I suspect the large semi-truck traveling in the opposite direction in the lane next to me fooled the system.

Like so many other new cars built in China, the Hyundai Elexio’s driver monitoring system is overactive, ringing the moment you yawn or take your eyes off the road. Additionally, turning it offer requires multiple steps through the menu, which is frustrating.

Verdict

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The Hyundai Elexio is definitely better than the Kia EV5, which has quickly gained popularity in Australia and is the best-selling EV from a legacy brand in the local market. With this in mind, there’s a good chance that the Elexio should also sell well for Hyundai, and it’ll likely attract many shoppers who were previously interested in the Kona EV or Ioniq 5.

However, it may be prudent for buyers to exercise some patience before getting an Elexio. Earlier this year, Hyundai slashed prices of the Inster by AU$7,288 ($5,200), and reduced the Kona Electric by more than AU$13,000 ($9,200). If internal sales targets are missed, similar price adjustments for the Elexio would hardly be surprising.

Just as importantly, Hyundai’s latest EV still needs a few software refinements, particularly to its ADAS, before it feels like the clear choice in an increasingly crowded segment.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A quick look around the automotive industry would have most thinking that EV adoption is slowing down. Whether that perception holds true or not, Toyota is moving ahead full steam with not one, but three new electric vehicles, and the C-HR might be the most playful of the bunch. Yesterday, we talked about how the bZ Woodland is a great improvement on the old bZ4x. 

Review: 2026 Toyota bZ Woodland Is Quicker Than A GR Corolla, But That’s Not Its Real Trick

Today, the focus shifts to the C-HR, a revived nameplate that now returns exclusively as an EV. It’s a huge deal beyond just the fact that it’s going electric. It’s the first formerly gas-powered Toyota nameplate to go fully electric. Sure, it only beat the new Highlander by a few months, but that’s more than enough. Both will have a big impact on Toyota moving forward. 

While we don’t know what the Highlander will end up selling for, the C-HR is clearly aimed at a different demographic. With a starting price shy of $38,000 before destination and handling, it’s aimed at Tesla Model Y buyers wanting something a touch smaller. Packing standard all-wheel drive, 338 hp (252 kW), and almost 300 miles of range, it’s a new face in the segment that will no doubt blow up one day. 

Quick Facts

Now, all that’s left is to figure out if it’s good enough that it’ll gain a foothold for a long ride, or if it’s still a battery cell or two away from a fully-formed EV. Thankfully, a week of testing it in hilly Ojai, California, helped us figure out the good from the bad. 

Styling

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Let’s not play coy. While the C-HR’s nomenclature has always invited comparisons to Honda’s HR-V, the exterior designs couldn’t have been much more different when it first arrived. We’re happy to report that the same playful attitude carries over to this new electric version of the crossover. 

The front end adopts Toyota’s newer hammerhead design language, with a low, aggressive nose and slim lights that visually widen the car. The coupe-like roofline flows cleanly into the rear, and from certain angles, the C-HR almost looks more hatchback than crossover, which works in its favor. It feels athletic despite being clearly compromised on that front. 

Also: New Toyota Highlander Drops Its Biggest Tradition, And I Got A Front-Row Look

Compared to the bZ Woodland, the C-HR looks tighter and more urban. It’s clearly aimed at buyers who want something sporty and expressive rather than rugged or adventurous. The wheel options help sell that image, too, with 18-inch alloys on the SE and aggressive 20-inch wheels on higher trims.

If the old C-HR was bold but polarizing, this one is more mature. It’s still stylish, but it’s less desperate for attention and more apt to provide an experience worthy of an offbeat appearance. 

Cabin Space

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Toyota told us early on that we’d see a lot of crossover between this and the bZ Woodland, and it was right. It leverages supportive front seats, an intuitive infotainment setup, a steering wheel that feels good in your hands, and visibility that’s better than the sloping roofline suggests. The driver’s position feels good, though; we’d love a little more adjustability from the steering wheel. 

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

The 14-inch touchscreen dominates the dashboard and comes standard across the lineup. It’s responsive, cleanly laid out, and avoids the over-complicated UI issues that plague some competitors. Dual wireless charging pads and practical storage touches reinforce that Toyota still knows how to design for daily life.

Material quality is a step up from Toyota’s earlier EV efforts, too. Soft-touch surfaces and ambient lighting keep things modern without crossing into gimmicky territory. And then you climb into the rear seats. Things go from perfectly livable to suddenly only for the smallest around us. 

How Tight Is Too Tight?

I get that as a taller-than-average guy, I won’t fit everywhere, but I was sincerely shocked at just how tight the back seats of the C-HR are. This is a compact crossover, and that’s clear as soon as we compare it to another new crossover in the form of the Mazda CX-5. 

The Mazda has a wheelbase that is just 2.5 inches (63 mm) longer. Despite that, the CX-5 offers 7.7 inches (195 mm) of additional legroom, up to 2.8 inches of headroom, and in total over 10 cubic feet of extra space in the rear seats. Put simply, rear-seat occupants won’t be happy in the C-HR unless they’re relatively small. That said, they’ll fit kids just fine. 

Cargo space fares better, with 25.3 cubic feet behind the rear seats and nearly 60 cubic feet with them folded. That’s perfectly usable for daily life, but the passenger packaging tells you clearly where Toyota’s priorities were.

Driving Impressions

Here’s where the plot thickens, in the best way possible. EVs are well-known for their instant torque, but that doesn’t automatically make one good to drive. The way the C-HR moves about the world is with more authority than one might expect. It’s sharp. The short wheelbase helps it manage bends with confidence. And the steering is more communicative than in the larger bZ Woodland. 

Toyota claims 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds, and it absolutely feels believable. This thing moves… not with the aggressive chaos of a GR Corolla, but with the smooth, relentless urgency only an EV can deliver. In fact, this might be the quickest pseudo-practical car in Toyota’s lineup right now. It’s not trying to be a sports car, yet it’s faster in a straight line than many cars that are.

The low battery placement keeps the center of gravity down, and the chassis feels planted through corners. Steering is light but accurate enough that you want to push a little harder than you probably expected. There’s a maturity to the tuning. It’s composed, predictable, and easy to trust. The brakes are excellent, too. 

The regenerative braking paddles let you adjust deceleration on the fly, which adds a layer of driver involvement often missing from mainstream EVs. It’s not revolutionary, but it does make the driving experience feel more interactive.

Ride quality strikes a nice balance, too. It’s firm enough to feel sporty without punishing you over rough pavement. The C-HR doesn’t feel like a small SUV pretending to be sporty. It just feels like a well-sorted EV with some genuine personality. No, it’s a far cry from a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or a Tesla Model Y Performance, but it’s the EV I’d pick from Toyota’s lineup if driving feel was all that mattered. 

More: Toyota Made An Electric Subaru Outback As Powerful As A Supra

From a more practical standpoint, range tops out at 287 miles on the SE trim, dropping slightly with the larger wheels. Charging speeds max out at 150 kW DC fast charging. That’s enough to go from 10–80 percent in roughly 30 minutes under ideal conditions. As we’ve seen in the past, ideal conditions can be rare, but the inclusion of Tesla’s NACS port should help. 

Competition

The C-HR lands in an increasingly crowded space, but its personality gives it, like the bZ Woodland, a unique angle. The Tesla Model Y remains the benchmark for space and usability. It’s roomier, more versatile, and easier to live with if rear-seat comfort matters. The Model 3, while technically a sedan, also beats the C-HR for rear-seat comfort despite looking smaller.

Frankly, comparing it on paper to most cars in the segment makes the C-HR look like a middling choice at best. Even pairing it against its badge-engineered sibling, the Subaru Uncharted, it costs more and isn’t available with front-wheel drive, which unlocks more range. That said, I’m not about to start complaining that we need more front-wheel drive cars.

Where the C-HR stands out is key, though. All-wheel drive is something that plenty of folks want and or need where they live. Second, it’s probably the easiest car in the segment to park, thanks to great sightlines and one of the shortest wheelbases here. That matters. 

No, it’s not the quickest, cheapest, or most spacious. Instead, it’s leaning into the vibe of a compact, economical electric vehicle to the best of its ability in its current form. And that form just so happens to be quite attractive and fun. 

The Verdict

Toyota just launched the new Highlander in all-electric form, which is a huge deal in itself, but let’s not forget that this new C-HR is the first formerly gas-powered Toyota to go all-EV in America. That’s also a big deal, and it makes this little commuter car an important inflection point in history. 

To that end, it’s great to see that Toyota didn’t hold back here regarding performance. The C-HR is properly quick, genuinely fun to pilot, and even fun to look at. The front seats, infotainment, and overall driving position are all excellent, and on the road, it feels composed, lively, and far more engaging than many electric crossovers in its segment.

That said, it’s not without compromise. Rear-seat space is tight enough to be a real consideration, especially if you regularly carry adults. This is a crossover that prioritizes style and driving feel over maximum practicality. And honestly, that might be exactly the point. Here, the fun comes first, and the practicality, while important, comes in second place. Will it be a mix that sells well? Only time will tell. 

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Toyota is one of the few brands that still seems intent on giving enthusiasts something to get excited about. Vehicles like the Land Cruiser, GR Corolla, and GR Supra make that clear. But what about the eco-conscious buyer with a family? Until now, that same energy hasn’t really carried over to its EV lineup. The bZ Woodland is meant to change that.

It would be easy to look at it and assume this is just another trim level dressed up with black plastic cladding and a roof rack meant to suggest capability more than deliver it. After all, Toyota is still a long way from securing a serious foothold in the all-electric space. This SUV, which actually looks more like a wagon on stilts, not dissimilar to older Subaru Outbacks, pushes the brand more squarely into the conversation.

Positioned above the standard bZ SUV, the Woodland adds nearly six inches of length, unique over-fenders, standard all-wheel drive, and boasts 8.4 inches (213 mm) of ground clearance. That’s just about an inch shy of a base Tacoma, and the pickup doesn’t come standard with 375 horsepower and a 0-60 time of 4.4 seconds either. 

QUICK FACTS

On paper, this could be the vehicle to move Toyota’s EV aspirations higher. It’s a family hauler. It sounds like it’ll be reasonably capable off-road. Clearly, on-road performance is something the automaker considered as well. Does it all actually pay off in the real world, though? That’s what we went all the way to California to find out. 

Rugged Cues With Familiar DNA

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

From afar, the bZ Woodland looks like it’s gone out into the world in a monotone plaid shirt. It’s trying to stand out and appear rugged, but not shouting for others to look at it. Some will love it and appreciate the understatedness, and others will think it’s trying too hard and is a bit overdone. Personally, I’m not sure the black plastic cladding is doing much good, but once it has some dirt on it, the overall package does appear appropriate. 

Read: Toyota’s Lineup Overhaul Could Include A Surprise Sedan

That said, it’s far from a departure from Toyota’s previous design efforts. The hammerhead nose, first introduced on the widely-loved new Prius design, is here and is complemented by a full-width LED lightbar and DRLs. The sideskirts and rear of the car offer more cladding and even a faux diffuser treatment below another full-width LED lightbar. 

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

If you’re getting Subaru vibes from the shape, don’t feel bad. This SUV rolls off a Subaru production line with that brand’s Trailseeker SUV. The two share just about everything under the skin, but compare them side to side, and to my eye, it’s the Toyota that seems to have a more cohesive design overall. 

Cabin Design And Layout

In the cabin, this crossover walks a fine line between rugged and refined. The materials feel good overall. They’re not luxurious or even what I’d call premium necessarily, but there’s a lot of thoughtful little touches to enjoy. Take, for example, the visual texturizing of the dashboard edges and upper door cards. 

It elevates what could otherwise be a very plain space. That said, it’s all monotone. Black and more black, unless you opt for Stone Brown. I wish there were a little more visual drama inside, but from a business standpoint, Toyota probably made the smart call.

Also: New Subaru Outback Finally Comes Out As An SUV

The cabin layout is straightforward to the point of being almost clinical. The 14-inch infotainment screen dominates the dash. It’s fast, intuitive, and thankfully backed up by integrated physical controls for key functions. The steering wheel feels tech-forward, with buttons for lane centering, voice commands, regenerative braking adjustments, and more. It’s busy, but logical.

Ergonomics And Everyday Usability

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

One potential issue, especially for shorter drivers, is that the steering wheel doesn’t have much in the way of maneuverability. My drive partner, Jason Torchinsky from our friends over at The Autopian, specifically remarked on how shorter drivers will struggle to see the entire gauge cluster without having the wheel block a significant portion of it. 

In other words, shorter drivers might have to pick between seeing the whole road or seeing the whole gauge cluster because doing both at once might be impossible. 

Another strange choice is the shifter knob. You have to press down on a ring and then rotate it in the direction you want. It’s not terrible. But it’s not intuitive, either. And it doesn’t feel like it adds anything meaningful. That space could’ve been used more creatively. Ahead of it, dual wireless chargers are a genuinely nice touch. It’s the kind of small usability win that makes daily life easier.

More: Are We Entering A New Era Of Badge Engineering?

Rear seat space is where reality sets in. For a relatively large crossover, comparable in footprint to something like a Crown Signia, it’s tight back there. At 6’6″, I’ve endured my share of cramped rear benches, but I wasn’t expecting to have to slouch this much. Average-sized adults will be fine. Taller passengers should absolutely call shotgun.

Cargo space makes up for it. With 74.9 cubic feet available with the seats folded, it’s genuinely cavernous. I fit a full-size, full-suspension mountain bike in the back, thanks to The Mob Shop, without removing the front wheel. That’s impressive. 

It speaks not only to total volume but to how large and usable the rear opening is. If it swallows a modern mountain bike that I could ride whole, it’ll handle just about anything else you throw at it. If that’s not enough, it can also tow up to 3,500 pounds (1,588 kg). 

Technology And Charging

Toyota loads the Woodland well. The 14-inch touchscreen runs Toyota’s latest multimedia software with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The system is quick and easy to navigate. Dual Bluetooth pairing, Wi-Fi hotspot capability, and available JBL audio round things out nicely. 

Charging is handled via a North American Charging Standard (NACS) port, giving access to a broad network of fast chargers. Under ideal conditions, Toyota says it’ll go from 10% to 80% in around 30 minutes. There’s also battery preconditioning and Plug & Charge capability to simplify public charging. That alone is a huge step in the right direction. 

Steering-wheel-mounted paddles allow you to adjust regenerative braking intensity on the fly. It’s a useful way to fine-tune the driving experience depending on terrain or traffic. Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 comes standard, along with features like Blind Spot Monitoring, Rear Cross-Traffic Alert, Panoramic View Monitor with Multi-Terrain Monitor, and Safe Exit Alert.

It’s a comprehensive package that just about all buyers will benefit from. 

Drive Impressions

Here’s where things take another unexpected turn, and this time, it’s decidedly for the better. Testing crossovers often means evaluating a vehicle that starts out compromised by design. What you don’t expect is something that does so many things at an above-average level, but that’s exactly where the bZ Woodland lands from a driver’s perspective.

Within 60 seconds of the opening presentation surrounding this vehicle, Toyota was proudly boasting that it has a 0-60 time of just 4.4 seconds. That’s unusual both in how it’s positioned and in terms of outright quickness.

For context, that’s quick enough to leave a GR Corolla (4.8 seconds) for dead and to almost keep up with a GR Supra manual (4.2 seconds). It actually beats the older four-cylinder version of the Supra (5.0 seconds). That said, this car isn’t really about outright speed. It’s about well-rounded capability.

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

What matters is how broad its competence is. On steep dirt roads, even with minimal momentum, the Woodland climbed confidently. On an off-road course with deep ruts that frequently lifted a wheel into the air, it slowly and methodically found traction and worked its way forward.

Grip Control functions like a low-speed cruise control for rough terrain, maintaining a steady crawl (roughly 3–5 mph or 5–8 km/h)) without constant throttle or brake input. In my testing, it wasn’t strictly necessary, but I can see it being useful on tight trails where steering precision matters more than pedal modulation.

On pavement, it’s exactly what most buyers want. Quiet. Smooth. Stable. Even on the optional all-terrain tires, road noise is impressively subdued. 

Is it engaging? Not really. It’s more forgettable than fun. But it’s also sharp enough and consistent enough that you won’t complain. Visibility is good. Controls are balanced. Feedback is predictable. It’s faster than most people need, more capable off-road than most buyers will ever test, and more comfortable in daily driving than you’d expect from something with this much performance on tap. That’s a pretty compelling blend.

Range And Real World Efficiency

Toyota says the bZ Woodland will get up to 281 miles of range or 260 with its $0 optional all-terrain rubber. We drove different versions to different degrees of accelerator pedal excess, but managed one key finding in the end. During one restrained trip on a car equipped with all-terrain tires, we managed 3.5 miles per kWh. 

Considering the 74.7 kWh battery pack under the floor, that works out to a potential 261 miles (420 km) on a single charge, assuming conditions stayed consistent. It’s difficult to view that as anything but a win, especially given that this wasn’t a tightly controlled test facility but real-world driving in Ojai, California, where the roads are rarely flat or straight.

Sure, we’d love even more range, but for now, we’ll take just barely beating an EPA estimate. After all, few folks will use up 260 miles of range in a day anyway. 

Market Rivals And Positioning

Unquestionably, the biggest competition for the bZ Woodland will be from the Subaru Trailseeker. Positioned as an electric version of the well-loved Outback, the Trailseeker starts at around $5,000 less ($39,995) than the bZ Woodland ($45,300) and features the same underpinnings, battery, and AWD system. We haven’t sat in one, but based on photos, the cabin looks very similar. We expect the two to drive and handle almost identically as well. 

Beyond the Subaru, there aren’t many EVs in this same niche. Rivian’s upcoming $45,000 R2 is likely the closest as it attempts to pair off-road capability with a premium cabin and on-road performance. Even so, it lacks the brand loyalty and recognition Toyota commands, along with the broader availability and ownership advantages, including a vast dealership network and established service infrastructure, that come with choosing a legacy automaker rather than a startup still finding its footing.

Other automakers like Tesla, Ford, Chevrolet, and Honda all have two-row crossovers or SUVs that could go up against the bZ Woodland on the road. None of them really has the same off-road capability angle to their game, though. Some, like Tesla, can’t come close to matching Toyota’s 3,500-lb towing capacity either. We expect that it’ll help Toyota capture a portion of the market that these others simply can’t touch. 

Final Thoughts

The bZ Woodland reminds me of something like the Ford F-150. It’s very capable, but very few folks will ever use it to eight tenths of its performance envelope, much less ten tenths. That said, it’s hard to ignore just how much of Toyota’s DNA and ethos managed to find its way into this crossover. The original bZ4x never really felt all that akin to the brand from an identity standpoint. 

Toyota’s newest EV offers serious practicality, objective soft-roading capability, and even a bit of serious performance on paved roads. Yes, the rear seat is tight for tall passengers. Yes, the shifter is odd. And yes, the interior could use a little more visual excitement.

But taken as a whole, the bZ Woodland is a genuinely well-rounded electric crossover that does more things well than it does poorly. And for a first serious swing at an adventurous, all-electric Toyota SUV, that’s a strong place to start.

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Range extenders are enjoying a bit of a renaissance at the moment. Early examples like the Chevrolet Bolt and BMW i3 gave the world a preview of what these powertrains were capable of, but they largely fell out of favor in the middle of the last decade as carmakers shifted their focus to fully electric models.

Review: Before You Buy A Small SUV, Look At Kia’s 2026 K4 Turbo Hatch First

Things have changed. Thanks in large part to several major Chinese manufacturers, range-extender EVs are becoming more common and are even being adopted by legacy brands like Ford and Hyundai. Last year, Leapmotor, Stellantis’ Chinese partner brand, joined the movement by adding a range-extender option to its mid-size C10 SUV, and we had the chance to live with it over the Christmas period.

QUICK FACTS

In markets where charging infrastructure is still patchy and long-distance driving is simply part of life, the range-extender idea holds up. You get the smooth, instant response of an EV without planning your schedule around charging stops.

On paper, the C10 REEV arrives at the right moment, pitching itself as sensible rather than compromised. In reality, while the powertrain delivers on that promise, the experience is undercut by a collection of nagging tech issues that chip away at its appeal.

What Changes With The REEV?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The first Leapmotor I tested last year was the regular C10 EV, equipped with a 69.9 kWh battery and a rear-mounted electric motor with 215 hp and 236 lb-ft (320 Nm). The C10 REEV is quite a bit different.

Review: I Drove Stellantis’ Chinese Electric SUV That Rivals Tesla For Just $30K

Under the hood sits a 1.5-liter four-cylinder that never drives the wheels, serving solely as a generator to charge the battery pack. That battery is a 28.4 kWh unit powering a rear-mounted electric motor rated at 158 kW (212 hp) and 320 Nm (236 lb-ft) of torque.

Leapmotor says the C10 REEV can travel up to 1,150 km (715 miles) between top-ups and charges, average 15.2 kWh/100 km in electric operation, and has a quoted fuel consumption of 0.9 l/100 km (261 US mpg).

Visually, there’s nothing differentiating the C10 REEV from the EV. That means it looks as uninspiring as the EV, with not even the slightest bit of personality.

How’s The Interior?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

In the cabin, it’s also very familiar. Leapmotor has done exactly what Tesla popularized with the Model 3 and Model Y, opting for an ultra-minimalist design that some people will love, but others will hate.

A 14.6-inch infotainment display sits at the center of the dash running on Leapmotor’s in-house operating system, which uses Android as its base. While we wouldn’t go as far as to describe the C10’s infotainment as good as Tesla’s, it’s surprisingly not far off.

The tablet-like design doesn’t require a steep learning curve to get used to, and the display is very responsive to the touch. Admittedly, some of the settings hidden in the menu are a little too comprehensive, and it can be difficult to find things while on the move. Fortunately, there is a swipe-down notification menu that can be configured with dozens of different toggles for important vehicle functions, ensuring they’re never more than a couple of touches away.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Frustratingly, the display does not support smartphone mirroring, so there’s no Android Auto or Apple CarPlay, leaving me to place my phone in the cupholder for navigation. Additionally, the quality of the reversing camera is shocking and not up to modern standards. The infotainment system also needs 15 seconds to load after the car is turned on, by which time I’d often already reversed without the camera loading and started driving away.

All of the materials used feel pleasantly plush, particularly the soft-touch leather adorning the seats, door panels, dashboard, and center console. However, I found that the leather marked very easily, so while it looks nice, it doesn’t stay clean for very long.

Entering and exiting the C10 REEV also turned into a bigger hassle than it should have been. In the first C10 I tested, I easily synced my phone with it and used it as the key. When I tried to use the Leapmotor app on my phone to do the same with this C10, it refused to work. A bit of digging suggests this could have been because the VIN had already been assigned to another device. Apparently, resetting the infotainment system should have fixed it. It didn’t.

Do Small Annoyances Add Up?

This left me with no choice but to use the silly keycard for my two weeks with the C10 REEV. Not only is a keycard inferior to a traditional key in every single way, but it also doesn’t have any buttons, meaning I had to tap the NFC logo on the driver’s side mirror every time I wanted to lock or unlock it. It doesn’t even have a proximity locking/unlocking function, so when unloading things out of the passenger side or the trunk, I’d have to walk back around to the driver’s mirror and tap it.

I get it, keycards are in fashion (thanks, Tesla…), but they are just not nice to use.

My issues didn’t stop here. The air conditioning is genuinely disappointing. With the temperature turned down to its lowest setting, the AC on, and the fan speed at full, the C10 would only blow out mildly cool air, equivalent to what most cars do with the AC turned off and just the fans running. In the Australian summer, that was very annoying.

Set those issues aside, and the cabin of the C10 REEV is a nice place to spend time. It’s spacious, and there’s plenty of room in the rear, too. Cargo space is also good, as it can swallow up to 546 liters (19.2 cubic feet) or 1,375 liters (48.5 cubic-feet) with the rear seats folded down.

Smooth Power

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Out on the open road, I quickly grew quite fond of the range-extender powertrain, and actually preferred it to the more traditional full-EV version.

As the engine is only ever operating in the background to charge the battery, it doesn’t intrude on the driving experience at all. In fact, even when I had the Leapmotor in the mode that prioritizes the engine charging the battery, the four-cylinder barely ever revved to beyond 2,000 rpm, so it couldn’t be heard. Around town, it’ll happily sit at less than 1,200 rpm, remaining completely silent while the instant power and torque of the rear-mounted electric motor make the REEV drive just as smoothly as an EV.

I ended my two weeks with the C10 REEV averaging 14.5 kWh/100 km, while fuel consumption sat at 6.1 l/100 km (38.5 US mpg).

On The Road

Admittedly, the Leapmotor isn’t particularly fun or engaging to drive. It takes 8.5 seconds to reach 100 km/h (62 mph) and isn’t the type of SUV that likes to be driven in a sporty manner. Drive it calmy, and it does the job just fine.

As I found in my first test of the all-electric C10, the driver assistance systems leave a lot to be desired. The SUV includes both adaptive cruise control and active lane centering, neither of which works well. Even if the adaptive cruise is set and the C10 detects a vehicle ahead, it’ll struggle to maintain a consistent distance from it, repeatedly accelerating and decelerating to hold position.

The lane centering also needs improvement. I spent hours on end sitting on well-marked highways during my time with the Leapmotor, and it’d consistently ping-pong between the lines. That’s unacceptable in this day and age.

The C10 REEV also has several other overactive sensors, like the driver attention monitoring system and speed limit warnings. Fortunately, these can be easily disabled in the swipe-down menu, and I didn’t find them to be as intrusive as I did when I first tested the C10 six months ago.

Ride quality is good most of the time, but there were a few instances when it felt like I hit the bump stops after going over speed bumps a little too fast, which most cars would have easily dealt with. The steering is exceptionally light, particularly in the Comfort setting, but it can be configured to feel slightly firmer in Sport mode.

Verdict

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The Leapmotor C10 REEV has promise. The trick hybrid powertrain works well, combining all of the benefits of a traditional EV like smoothness and instant power, without any of the downsides like range anxiety, particularly in Australia, where the charging network is sub-par.

However, the overall experience of living with the C10 is marred by poorly calibrated safety systems and some tech gremlins that need to be fixed. If these systems can be improved with software updates, the C10 REEV would be a very tempting proposition.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Electric car startups are everywhere these days, but most struggle to move beyond the hype. Zeekr is one of the rare exceptions. In just five years, Geely Group’s premium EV-focused brand has already rolled out a handful of genuinely impressive models and is making real progress with its battery tech.

Review: The 2026 Ioniq 9 Calligraphy’s Biggest Threat Is Another Hyundai

Initially, Zeekr’s models were sold only in China, but the company has since expanded quickly abroad. First came the smaller X, a compact SUV that shares its tech with the Volvo EX30 and Smart #1. Most recently, Zeekr launched the 7X in Australia. It’s been pitched as a Tesla Model Y rival, but can it really measure up to the world’s most popular EV?

QUICK FACTS

After spending time living with the flagship 7X Performance AWD, we came away convinced. It doesn’t just keep up with Tesla’s best, it beats it in several areas, and in some cases, rivals EVs that cost two or even three times more. In short, it’s well worth your attention.

How Much Does It Cost?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Three different versions of the 7X are available. The range starts at AU$57,900 (equal to US$40,400 at current exchange rates) for the RWD, undercutting a Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive by AU$1,000 (US$700). Sitting in the middle of the 7X family is the Long Range RWD, priced at AU$63,900 (US$44,500), or AU$5,000 (US$3,500) less than the Model Y Long Range All-Wheel Drive.

Perched at the top of the line-up is the Performance AWD, starting at AU$72,900 (US$50,800), making it comparatively cheap compared to the AU$89,400 (US$62,300) Model Y Performance All-Wheel Drive.

So, what do you get for your money? The 7X Performance AWD uses a 100 kWh NMC battery and has electric motors at the front and rear, combining to produce a monstrous 475 kW (637 hp) and 710 Nm (524 lb-ft) of torque. Thanks to its advanced 800-volt architecture, it supports DC charging at up to 420 kW and AC charging at 22 kW.

What’s It Like Inside?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

It’s also a certifiable tech-fest, and this is no more obvious than in the cabin. Unlike Tesla and some competitors like Xpeng, Zeekr hasn’t adopted the same ultra-minimalistic approach that appeals to some but, to us, is usually an exercise in penny-pinching.

After pressing a button on the B-pillar to open the driver’s door, I was immediately struck by the remarkable fit and finish of the 7X’s cabin. Not only does it feel more premium and way more interesting than a Model Y, but it also feels of a higher standard than cars from legacy rivals like Kia’s EV5, and even BMW and Audi. In fact, the 7X’s cabin feels almost as plush as the Lotus Eletre I tested last year, which also comes from Geely but costs three times as much.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A 16-inch infotainment display sits in the center of the dashboard and is brilliant. It’s among the snappiest I’ve ever used, thanks to the high-end Qualcomm processor, and is an absolute joy to use.

Review: New Zeekr X Got Me Questioning My Feelings For Volvo

Like so many other EVs, it has a smartphone-inspired setup with a swipe-down menu for shortcuts and notifications, as well as an in-depth settings menu. You don’t have to wait even a split second for the screen to load after sitting inside, and if your phone’s connected, Apple CarPlay or Android Auto will load instantaneously.

All the climate control settings are on the screen, and while auto scribes like ourselves often complain about this, it didn’t bother me in the 7X, as it’s easy to use, even on the move. However, I found it could take up to 5 minutes for the AC to start blasting really cold air on hot days.

What Else Makes The Cabin Stand Out?

The 13-inch digital instrument cluster and 36-inch head-up display are also superb, although the cluster offers very little scope for customization, which is a shame.

Zeekr’s designers and engineers were incredibly thoughtful when crafting the 7X’s cabin. There are beautiful knurled metal switches below the screen, metal speaker grilles on the pillars and door panels, and beautiful soft-touch materials across virtually every square-inch of the cabin, even along the lower parts of the door panels.

Elsewhere, there are hidden pockets on the door’s armrests, two 50-watt cooled wireless charging pads, and a gargantuan center console storage area. There are plenty of luxurious features too, including heated and ventilated seats, as well as massage functions for the front pews, which are among the best I’ve ever used. In the rear, there are even electronic sunshades that deploy at the press of a button, and hidden storage draws under the seats.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The 7X Long Range RWD and Performance AWD also include a 21-speaker audio system that’s incredibly adjustable and of great quality, although it didn’t sound quite as crisp as I would have liked. Zeekr has also added a panoramic glass roof, and unlike some rivals, it includes a folding shade. There’s even an interior camera on the B-pillar, which displays a live video to the infotainment screen, allowing drivers to keep a watchful eye on their kids at any time.

What About The Trick Doors?

Then there are the doors. As mentioned, they’re electric. From inside, you touch a button, and they will open, using sensors to determine if there’s an object nearby, automatically adjusting how far they’ll open. When entering, the doors can be pulled shut manually or by pressing the same button. The driver can even close the doors by stepping on the brake, just like a Rolls-Royce.

For the most part, these doors work well, although there were occasions when they didn’t open as wide as they could have, even if there was nothing blocking them. Fortunately, the electric functions can be disabled, and they can be used like manual doors.

The 7X also has adaptive Magic Carpet air suspension with Zeekr’s Continuous Damping Control system and five different ride heights, including one where it looks slammed to the ground, and one where it sits high enough for off-roading.

Visibility is good, though the rear window view is very limited. Given how much tech is found inside the 7X, it’s perhaps surprising that there isn’t a digital rearview mirror, similar to what sister brand Polestar uses. Storage space is great with 539 liters (19 cubic-feet) of cargo space, and 1,978 liters (69.8 cubic-feet) with the rear seats folded down. There’s also a 42-liter (1.4 cubic foot) frunk.

How Does It Drive?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

With a serious amount of power, it’s no surprise that the 7X Performance AWD feels absolutely ferocious in a straight line. Zeekr says it needs just 3.8 seconds to hit 100 km/h, (62 mph) and that’s a figure we were able to match. There’s no need to worry about the acceleration being capped as the battery drains either, as it’ll still run sub-4.0 second times even below 30 percent state of charge.

The ‘Performance’ name could easily lead you to think this is a focused, razor-sharp model like a BMW M or an Audi RS, but that’s not the case. Let me explain.

SUVs, particularly heavy electric ones that place too much emphasis on dynamic handling, often have compromised levels of comfort. Some owners may be willing to live with this for an occasional blast along a mountain road, but for the vast, vast majority of driving scenarios, luxury EVs like the 7X need to feel polished and comfortable. That’s exactly the feeling Zeekr has achieved.

If you throw the 7X aggressively into turns, it offers immense levels of grip, but can feel a little unsettled. Additionally, the front seats offer very little bolstering, so you can slide around while behind the wheel. However, drive it at 80 percent of its capabilities, or below, and it feels just about perfect.

First is the ride. The adaptive suspension offers Comfort, Standard, and Sport options. The first is very supple, but perhaps is a little too floaty. For most of my time with the 7X, I drove it with the ride in Standard mode, finding it remained soft over speed bumps, without bouncing around unnecessarily. Even in the stiffer Sport mode, it feels softer than some other heavy electric SUVs, like the Kia EV5.  

The steering also offers Comfort, Standard, and Sport settings. Regardless of which is selected, the steering remains sharp, even though it lacks communication like virtually all electronic steering systems on the market. Much to my surprise, I left it in Comfort most of the time, enjoying how light and direct the steering was.

Photo Credits: Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Zeekr has also done a superb job of calibrating the brakes, and they feel completely natural, as if there isn’t any regen going on, even though there is. Of course, there is also a one-pedal driving mode, perfect for use in town. However, the one-pedal mode isn’t nearly as strong as some rivals, so unless you lift off the throttle far in advance before a stop, you’ll still need to gently apply the brakes. That’s no drama, as even when driven spiritedly, the big orange calipers feel up to the task.

Review: The Kia EV5 Makes More Sense Than A Tesla Model Y

Whereas the RWD and Long Range RWD models have 19-inch wheels, the Performance AWD sits on larger 21-inch forged units wrapped in Continental EcoContact7 tires. Grip is good, although there’s quite a bit of tire noise at highway speeds. We suspect the 19-inch wheels are quieter.

Is Zeekr’s ADAS As Polished As The Rest?

Zeekr’s ADAS system is also a good one. It’s enabled just like Autopilot on a Tesla, offering good radar cruise control functionality, as well as active lane centering. During multiple long highway stints, it always kept me in the center of my lane and even includes an automatic lane-change function that worked faultlessly.

However, there was also one time when the entire ADAS system was disabled as I hit a bump while crossing onto a bridge. But, for the most part, it works well.

Interestingly, Australian models use a Mobileye software stack for their ADAS, where in other markets there’s an Nvidia system instead. This system is also included in the recently updated 7X launched in China, which features a 900-volt platform, and it is expected to come to Australia next year. According to some reports, the Nvidia system is even better, but we will have to wait and see.

How Far Can It Go?

Zeekr says the 7X Performance AWD can travel up to 543 km (337 miles) on a single charge and quotes power consumption of 19.9 kWh/100 km. During my time with it, I averaged 21.8 kWh/100 km with an even mix of urban and highway driving.

That’s not great, but it is better than the 22.4 kWh/100 km I averaged in the Audi SQ6 e-tron, even though it has 95 kW (127 hp) less grunt than the Zeekr. Those seeking better efficiency would be wise to opt for either the RWD or Long Range RWD models with driving ranges of 480 km (298 miles) and 615 km (382 miles).

What’s The Verdict?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The Zeekr 7X is superb in almost all areas. Its cabin is a key highlight: not only does it feel way more premium than a Tesla, but it also feels nicer than the excellent BYD Sealion 7, and many other German EVs, for that matter. Vehicles like the 7X have shattered the illusion that you need to buy something from a premium legacy brand, and to pay a hefty price, to get a high-quality vehicle.

While I haven’t had the chance to drive the RWD and Long Range RWD versions, I suspect that these will suit most buyers more than the Performance AWD. Regardless, all three have been competitively priced, offer amazing features, and once again prove that when it comes to EVs, the Chinese do it better than most.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

We’ve grown accustomed to how quickly electric cars evolve, but few models illustrate that pace of change as clearly as the latest iteration of Audi’s e-tron GT. What is essentially Audi’s halo EV has been completely reengineered in just a few short years. This isn’t your usual mid-cycle refresh, and Audi isn’t pretending it is.

Read: Audi Gave Up On The A2, Now It’s Making The Q2 e-Tron To Win You Back

Sales of the original e-tron GT kicked off in Europe back in mid-2021, though Australian deliveries didn’t begin until late 2022. Fast forward just over 18 months, and Audi has already rolled out a completely new e-tron GT line-up, one so far ahead of its predecessor that even the latest base model now outguns the previous RS flagship in power.

QUICK FACTS

This new model went on sale Down Under towards the end of 2025, and we recently had the opportunity to live with the flagship model in the range, the all-new RS e-tron GT Performance. I was not prepared for what I would discover.

What’s New?

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Most would agree that the e-tron GT is an extraordinary piece of automotive design. We’d argue it’s the best-looking EV on the market, and one of the finer-looking sedans of the past decade. However, the original RS version just didn’t look special enough.

Aside from minor visual tweaks, the flagship version looked virtually identical to the base model, which was somewhat disappointing for an RS-branded car. Audi appears to have addressed these complaints and, for the 2026 RS e-tron GT and RS e-tron GT Performance models, has ensured they stand out from the base version.

Also: All Future Audis Will Have This Grille, Mustache Memes Be Damned

The most obvious updates are found at the front. While the same basic grille has been retained, the front air intakes are now more aggressive, with a forged carbon fiber finish, as on our test car. The bold new touches continue at the rear with a bespoke diffuser, also finished in forged carbon, and a set of unique six double-spoke 21-inch wheels.

An Updated Powertrain

These updates are welcome, but they pale in comparison to the changes that Audi has made under the skin. The 84 kWh battery pack of the old model has been removed and replaced with a larger 97 kWh battery that weighs 9 kg (19.8 lbs) less. Additionally, all three e-tron GT versions now support DC charging speeds of up to 320 kW, a welcome boost from the 270 kW of the old model.

Read: 2025 Audi RS e-tron GT Performance Has 912 HP, Hits 62 MPH In 2.5 Seconds

Then there’s the power. The base S e-tron GT has 500 kW (670 hp) and 717 Nm (529 lb-ft) with launch control, allowing it to hit 100 km/h (62 mph) in 3.4 seconds and drive 558 km (347 miles) on a charge. The mid-tier RS e-tron GT is rated at a peak of 630 kW (845 hp) and 865 Nm (638 lb-ft), running to 100 km/h in 2.8 seconds and boasting a driving range of 522 km (324 miles).

The daddy of the line-up is the RS e-tron GT Performance we tested, Audi’s equivalent to the refreshed Taycan Turbo S. It peaks out at 680 kW (912 hp), 1,027 Nm (757 lb-ft) of torque, and can hit 100 km/h in a claimed 2.5 seconds. It does all of these while boasting a range of 528 km (328 miles). It’s not cheap, however. In Australia, prices for the flagship start at AU$309,900 ($216,800), though our test car included several options, bringing the total to AU$324,400 ($226,900).

A Cabin To Remember

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The interior of the new RS e-tron GT Performance is largely the same as the pre-facelift model, but does benefit from some updates. These include a new flat-bottom and flat-top Alcantara steering wheel with bright red Boost and RS buttons.

Our tester was also fitted with the AU$4,500 ($3,100) performance design package, adding several green accents and Nappa leather. It also included the AU$10,000 ($7,000) Matt carbon camouflage package, which adds forged carbon to the exterior, side sills, dashboard, and door panels. The look of the carbon won’t be to everyone’s tastes, but it’s certainly striking.

Review: The 2024 Audi RS e-tron GT Will Warp Your Sense Of Reality

Most touchpoints are excellent, and the cabin carries a premium feel. Still, much of the switchgear and lower-grade plastics come straight from less expensive Audi models, which is somewhat disappointing given the car’s sky-high price tag.

Among the key features carried over from the pre-facelift model are the superb RS-branded front seats, the 10.1-inch infotainment display, and the 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. There’s wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a thumping 16-speaker Bang & Olufsen audio system, and among the finest front seat massage functions of any car currently on sale. To put it simply, the RS e-tron GT is a joy to spend time in.

Read: Audi Design Boss Wants To Remove Big Screens From Future Models

Perhaps the most obvious downside of the incredibly good looks and that swooping roofline is that headroom in the rear isn’t great for tall adults. It also feels a little sparse back there with just a pair of USB-C ports and simple fan speed controls.

Unrelenting Acceleration

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Heading into my week with the RS e-tron GT Performance, I knew it was going to be the quickest car I’d ever driven. But nothing could quite prepare me for this EV’s ferociousness off the line, and yet its plushness and comfort during daily driving.

As mentioned, Audi quotes a 0-100 km/h time of 2.5 seconds. Try as I might, I was never able to match that with my GPS timer, recording a best time of 2.63 seconds, covering the sprint to 100 km/h in just 39.1 meters (129 feet). If you can actually feel the difference between 2.63 and 2.5 seconds, congratulations, you might be part stopwatch. As for what that kind of speed feels like? Absolutely brutal.

Pin the throttle and the Audi throws you back into the seat, building speed in a way that is truly terrifying. Like the original e-tron GT, this new model retains a two-speed transmission. While the original shifts into second gear at around 85 km/h (53 mph), the flagship Performance model will hold first gear for as long as possible, enabling remarkable acceleration.

During my testing, it felt like the car changed into second gear at around the 120 km/h (75 mph) mark, and when it does, the EV accelerates even faster, as if it’s a spaceship getting sucked into a black hole. It’s absolutely mesmerizing. Remarkably, the car delivers this performance while struggling to put all its power to the ground.

Regardless of whether the ESC is on, in Sport mode, or disabled entirely, the car will spin all four wheels to beyond 100 km/h, leaving faint black tire marks in its wake. I have no doubt that if I had been able to find a grippier piece of tarmac to reduce wheel slip, a 2.5-second run would have been achievable.

Chassis Changes

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Equally impressive as the way the RS e-tron GT Performance lurches forward is the new active suspension system. It builds upon the already remarkable setup of the old car, using technology similar to what’s found in the facelifted Porsche Taycan.

There’s trick air suspension working alongside two-valve dampers that eliminate the need for traditional anti-roll bars. In Comfort mode, the system is so advanced that it can actually lean the car into a corner, while in one of the RS modes, the suspension activates to eliminate even the slightest hint of body roll. Yes, despite the car weighing 2,330 kg (5,137 lbs), it has an uncanny ability to remain flat, even during high-speed slaloms.

I was offered my first taste of this system when I unlocked the car for the first time. As soon as I opened the driver’s door, the ride height quickly jumped up a couple of inches, making it easier to get in. When exiting, the same thing happens. It’s a neat party feature that can be disabled if owners prefer not to have it.

Read: Audi’s 2026 A5 And Q5 Fix One Of Its Most Annoying Interior Decisions

Presented with a mountain road, the car absolutely shines. Fitted with 265/35 front and 305/30 Bridgestone Potenza Sport tires, the RS e-tron GT Performance can speed through corners beyond what some potent sports cars can do, with very little fuss. It’d take a very brave soul to push this thing to its limits on the road, and it probably needs to be driven on a track to be fully appreciated.

As with before, the comfort is also superb. With the suspension in one of the softer settings, the e-tron GT soaks up bumps better than any other Audi, oftentimes making potholes and speed bumps feel almost non-existent. It honestly beggars belief how comfortable the car is on long journeys. An all-wheel steering system also ensures it’s easy to drive in tight urban areas and parking lots, reducing the risk of curbing those inevitably very expensive wheels.

All of the incredible performance comes at the expense of efficiency. Audi quotes efficiency of 21 kWh/100 km, and while I was able to match that figure, it’s slightly higher than the old car. But, just like you shouldn’t buy an Audi RS6 Avant expecting it to be fuel efficient, the Performance isn’t the type of EV you should buy if you want to eke out as much range as possible.

See: Audi Driver Hits 190 MPH On Public Road, Then Shows It To The Cops On TikTok

Critiquing the car’s handling is rather difficult. Some may find the steering to feel overly assisted and unnaturally sharp, but I grew accustomed to it very quickly.

One frustrating issue I experienced with the parking sensors is that they beep incessantly and loudly, as if you’re about to hit something, even when there are several inches of clearance. There were also a couple of occasions when the rear-cross traffic alert system was engaged while I was reverse parking, even though there was no risk of hitting anything.

Verdict

The e-tron GT remains the best EV that Audi currently produces, and the flagship RS e-tron GT Performance provides true supercar-levels of performance, making it one of the most engaging and enjoyable EVs to drive, too.

The additional performance Audi has added is extraordinary, but it comes at a cost. The old flagship started at AU$246,875 ($172,700), or more than AU$63,000 ($44,000) less than the new one. That’s a sizeable price hike, regardless of the changes made. If this new model follows the same depreciation curve as the pre-facelift model, it could be an absolute bargain in a few years.

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Building a loyal enthusiast following from the ground up isn’t something carmakers typically pull off overnight. For Hyundai, a brand that wasn’t exactly on anyone’s radar for fun, driver-focused cars to begin with, establishing its N performance sub-brand was not just about creating engaging machines. It was about cultivating a culture, and that’s a far more elusive achievement.

Review: What’s It Like Living With The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N?

However, thanks to a host of owner-focused events, Hyundai Australia has done just that. There are now thousands of tightly-knit N owners across the country, helping the company’s creations become among the nation’s best-selling hot hatches. Not only that, but cars like the i20 N and i30 N have become genuine benchmarks in their respective segments.

In late November, the annual N Festival returned for its seventh iteration, but with a twist. Not only was the event open to N owners, but also to a select number of owners from other brands, so we decided to join in with a bright yellow Renault.

Nvy

Hyundai N Australia

The 2025 event was held at Winton Raceway, roughly two hours north of Melbourne. As interest in the N Festival has increased in recent years, it’s no longer just an event run over Saturday and Sunday, but for the first time, it was extended to a three-day event. For eager owners wanting to get onto the track, there’s no better event.

Read: I Flew To Germany To Conquer The Nurburgring; It Conquered Me Instead

More than 350 cars attended in December. To join in, all that was required was a AU$60 ($40) entrance fee. In return, owners get ample time on the track, a gift bag of N merchandise, and tutelage from experienced driving instructors. This makes it an absolute bargain, particularly since regular track days usually start at upwards of AU$300 ($200).

Newcomers Join the Action

New to the 2025 N Festival were the ‘Nvy Track Sessions.’ These sessions were open to 20 non-N car owners each of the three days. To participate, you needed to receive an invitation from an N owner and to pay the same fee. I managed to secure a spot for my Renault Megane RS275.

On Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, participants were split into six groups of 20 cars, with one group for the non-N cars. Each group had five 15-minute sessions on the track, totaling 75 minutes across the day. For pretty much anyone not named Max Verstappen, that’s more than enough track time.

Read: Riding In The Ioniq 5 N At Hyundai Australia’s N Festival

While I’ve done plenty of track days in the past, this was the first one in my Renault. The chassis and brakes are standard (for now…), although I have had it fitted with sticky Continental SportContact7 road tires, and the engine modified with a new intake, blow-off valve, intercooler, downpipe, and tune. It’s good for 219 kW (294 hp) and 445 Nm (328 lb-ft) of torque at the wheels, a healthy amount for the 2.0-liter turbo.

Hyundai N Australia

The temperatures were hot, pushing over 30° C (86° F) throughout my sessions, but my little French hot hatch performed flawlessly. There were some impressive cars in my sessions, like a new G80 BMW M3, an Audi RS5, a Porsche Cayman GT4, modified Toyota Supras, and a tuned Toyota GR Yaris, but I had no issue reeling each of them in and overtaking.

Review: The 2026 LBX Morizo RR Is A GR Corolla Disguised As A Lexus SUV

Just like the i30 N is considered among the best hot hatches on the market, the third-generation Megane RS275 was held in similarly high regard when it was launched. Honed on the Nurburgring, it felt right at home on the circuit, providing immense levels of grip, combined with superb stability under braking and great straight-line pace. Admittedly, my tires now look a little worse for wear.

Ns On The Track

Of course, it was the Hyundais that were the real stars of the day. Hyundai Australia brought along a slew of press cars for journalists to test out. I managed to snag some seat time in each of the company’s current models, including the i20 N, i30 N hatch, i30 N Sedan, and the potent Ioniq 5 N.

Winton Raceway is quite a tight, short track, perfect for hot hatches like those from Hyundai rather than high-horsepower monsters. The pint-sized i20 N proved to be the perfect companion for the circuit.

While the i20 N only has a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and is down more than 50 kW (67 hp) over the i30 N, it had no issue sticking with its bigger brothers on the circuit. It feels incredibly nimble and responsive, particularly around the circuit’s sweeping bends and tighter corners, often lifting one of its rear wheels as the front tires stick mercilessly to the track.

First Drive: 2026 Dodge Charger Sixpack Sounds Off, But Drives Better Than You Think

As standard, the i20 N comes with Pirelli P Zero NH tires, and they perform brilliantly on the track. As the day progressed, they did start to lose some grip, but importantly, they remained predictable despite the wear. The only issue I encountered was difficulties downshifting from 3rd to 2nd with the auto-rev match function enabled, something I also experienced at the N Festival back in 2022.

Extra Power, Extra Thrills

For those seeking superb on-track handling, combined with on-road comfort, and great straight-line speed, the i30 N hatch and i30 N Sedan remain among the best options on the market. While they may share a name, the i30 N Sedan has a longer wheelbase than the hatch and is based on a different chassis. In most of the world, it’s known as the Elantra.

Review: I Flew To Germany To Conquer The Nurburgring And It Conquered Me Instead

In a straight line, the i30 N hatch is a little sprightlier. While both cars have the same 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder and are advertised with the same 206 kW (276 hp) and 392 Nm (289 lb-ft), the hatch’s boost pressure peaks at 17 psi, whereas it usually sits around 14 psi in the Sedan. This is because the sedan has Hyundai’s controversial ‘Octane Learning Mode’.

To enable the full 17 psi, you’ll have to either drive in 8th gear between 109-159 km/h (68 -99 mph) for 5 minutes or more, or drive for 5 minutes or more in 44th or 5th gear at 40-70% throttle between 40-120 km/h (25 -75 mph). Obviously, this isn’t achievable on a track. Many owners I spoke to have had their cars tuned to unlock full boost without having to do this procedure.

The duo also feels quite different through the turns. Both stick extraordinarily well, providing enough grip to warp your face. However, the hatch is noticeably stiffer and feels a little lighter. By comparison, the i30 N Sedan feels more stable, owing to the longer wheelbase, and is easier to find the limits in. On the track, we prefer the hatch, but on the road, it’s the Sedan that stands out.

What the Ioniq 5 N Does Best

We also had the opportunity to do a few hot laps in Hyundai’s potent Ioniq 5 N. This is the performance car that has redefined what we thought was possible for an EV. Not only is it extraordinarily quick, but it’s also loads of fun to drive. It’s no surprise that Porsche and Lamborghini have benchmarked their EVs against it.

Obviously, the dual-motor powertrain makes the Ioniq 5 very quick in a straight line. However, because Winton’s straights are quite short, it doesn’t get much room to stretch its legs. Thankfully, it shines in other ways, particularly in its handling dynamics.

Review: The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N Is A Ballistic Missile That Redefines EVs

Thanks to some engineering trickery, it’s possible to shift the amount of power sent to the front and rear wheels. As such, the Ioniq 5 N can be driven effectively as a front-wheel-drive or rear-wheel-drive car. This means it is inherently more configurable and playful than Hyundai’s other N products. The downside? It’s electric, meaning it’s not so practical for track use unless a circuit has a DC fast charger.

Track Day Antics

The 2025 N Festival didn’t just include dozens of track sessions. This year, owners were also able to participate in a series of head-to-head rolling races to see who owns the quicker car in a straight line. There was also a Show’N Shine and an organized drive through some of the circuit’s neighboring country roads.

Australia’s N Festival has established itself as one of the best events on Australia’s track day calendar, and it’s easy to see why. It’s affordable, well organized, and welcoming. I’m sure it convinced some non-N owners to call up their local Hyundai dealership and place an order. As for me, used Ns remain out of my price range, so I’ll be keeping my French hot hatch.

Hyundai N Australia