Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

We Drove Volvo’s Flagship XC90 And EX90 And Only One Really Impressed Us: Review

Volvo has adjusted course on its electrification strategy, choosing not to go EV-only but instead continuing to offer updated versions of its combustion-powered models alongside their electric counterparts. The first to illustrate this dual-track approach is the 90 series, where the facelifted XC90 joins the all-new EX90. At a recent local test drive event, we had the chance to experience both SUVs side by side, taking each for a spin to see how they compare.

The EX90 was originally introduced in late 2022, but production didn’t start until mid-2024 due to supply issues and lingering software bugs. On the other hand, the second-generation XC90, originally debuted in 2014, received a mild refresh in 2019, and has just been treated to a more thorough update in 2024.

More: Volvo’s Reborn XC70 Is For The EV Skeptics

The two Swedish SUVs have similar footprints with three rows of seats. However, they ride on different underpinnings, as the XC90 retains the original SPA (Scalable Product Architecture) platform, while the EX90 utilizes the much newer SPA 2 architecture. More importantly, the XC90 offers mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid powertrain options, while the EX90 is exclusively available in fully electric form.

QUICK SPECS
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor PerformanceVolvo XC90 T8 PHEV AWD
PowertrainElectricPlug-in Hybrid
Power510 hp (380 kW / 517 PS)449 hp (335 kW / 455 PS)
Torque910 Nm (671 lb-ft)709 Nm (523 lb-ft)
0-62 mph (0-100 km/h) 4.9″ 5.4″
Top Speed180 km/h (112 mph)180 km/h (112 mph)
Battery111 kWh18.8 kWh
EV Range (WLTP)614 km (382 miles)71 km (44 miles)
PlatformSPA 2SPA
Length5,037 mm (198.3 inches)4,953 mm (195 inches)
Width1,964 mm (77.3 inches)1,958 mm (77.1 inches)
Height1,747 mm (68.8 inches)1,771 mm (69.7 inches)
Wheelbase2,985 mm (117.5 inches)2,984 mm (117.5 inches)
Boot (behind 2nd row)662 lt (23.4 cubic feet)668 lt (23.6 cubic feet)
Price (GR)€117,986 ($135,400)€104,709 ($120,100)
Price (US)$86,290$74,295
SWIPE

With the specifications laid out, the question becomes how these SUVs measure up in design, cabin quality, and on-road character.

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Who’s the Fairest of Them All?

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\

Both models cut an imposing figure on the road, though the EX90 stretches a little longer with its extended rear overhang. The XC90’s 2024 facelift, particularly its redesigned front fascia, succeeds in giving the veteran SUV a fresher appearance without altering the bulk of its bodywork.

The XC90’s grille features a distinctive pattern that immediately sets it apart from the EX90’s minimalist, closed-off face. I personally prefer the look of the XC90’s slimmer LED headlights with Thor’s hammer graphics over the EX90’s pixel-style DRLs with the overly complex split-opening theatrics. As for the faux side intakes of the XC90, in my opinion it wouldn’t hurt if they were smaller as they serve no real purpose.

More: Volvo ES90 Takes On BMW i5 With More Style And Range

From the side, the EX90 asserts its modernity with a clamshell hood, sharper dynamic lines, and flared fenders that integrate more seamlessly into the body. The same applies to the futuristic design of the 22-inch wheels that edge out the classy but conservative looks of the XC90’s 21-inch alloys.

The rear end is probably the weakest point of the XC90, with the EX90 looking one generation ahead. Don’t get me wrong – I always liked the aristocratic elegance of the big ICE-powered Volvo SUV but its tail has remained the same over the past decade and it can no longer hide its age. Having said that, I’m not a huge fan of the split taillight arrangement of the EX90 with extra LEDs flanking the rear glass.

Minimalism Over Perceived Quality

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Moving inside, the EX90 bets on minimalism, while the XC90 does a better job in the perceived quality with bigger chunks of fabric and wood inserts on the dashboard. The floating center console of the EV has more space for storage and a cool little case for the key, but I still prefer the more traditional setup of the XC90 with the crystal-like shifter.

In terms of tech, the XC90 has recently gained a 11.2 inch infotainment display and a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. The EX90 has a bigger and more commanding 14.5-inch touchscreen that’s joined by a smaller but easier to read 9-inch instrument cluster.

More: This New Seatbelt Reacts To Your Body Before A Crash Even Happens

The Google-powered infotainment software with crisp graphics is shared between the two, although the absence of physical buttons and shortcuts is a bit more frustrating in the EV. Overall, I didn’t like the fact I was several clicks away from accessing the selectable driving modes, but at least the climate controls are always visible on the lower end of the screen.

Predictably, the cabins of the SUVs feel similarly spacious. According to the spec sheets, the XC90 has slightly less headroom than the EX90, although it does have a touch of extra hip room on the third row. The boot is nearly identical, with 662 lt (23.4 cubic feet) for the EX90 and 668 lt (23.6 cubic feet) for the XC90 (both measured with the third-row seats folded). The seats are superb in both models, offering great levels of comfort and support for various body types.

Staying loyal to Volvo’s safety fixation (and reputation), both models come with sophisticated ADAS suites and a limited top speed of 180 km/h (112 mph). However, only the EX90 has a roof-mounted LiDAR, with the XC90 still relying on radar and camera sensors.

The Driving Experience is the Decisive Factor

My drive started with the XC90, as I wanted to see if it would still impress me as much as its predecessor did when I first drove it many years ago. It most certainly did. The ride is smooth, the cabin is serene, and it still feels like an excellent long-distance cruiser.

Predictably, the XC90 still feels like a big and heavy SUV when you push it in the corners, with a healthy amount of body roll despite the efforts of the self-leveling air suspension. With a combined output of 449 hp (335 kW / 455 PS) from its plug-in hybrid powertrain, the SUV is no slouch, but it’s clearly more geared towards comfort than outright performance.

More: Volvo Doesn’t Need Wagons Anymore, Says SUVs Are The Future

The EX90, on the other hand, feels like a step into the future. You immediately feel the difference the newer chassis makes in ride quality, combined with the more sophisticated dual-chamber air suspension. In Comfort mode, it glides over bumps, while Performance mode tightens it up reducing body roll. Furthermore, the steering of the EV feels quicker and more direct, doing a better job in disguising its heavyweight nature.

The EX90 we drove came fitted with the Performance powertrain which is a $5,000 option in the US. This dials up the combined output of the dual electric motors to 510 hp (380 kW / 517 PS) from the standard 397 hp (296 kW / 402 PS). Overall, the half-second advantage over the PHEV in the 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) sprint might not sound that big on paper, but the instant torque delivery and overall responsiveness make the EV feel significantly quicker on the road.

Final Thoughts

After spending a limited amount of time with Volvo’s two flagship SUVs, I reached two clear conclusions. The facelifted XC90 remains a strong contender in the segment, with welcome improvements in the design and ride quality. However, when driven back-to-back with the fully electric EX90, it’s clear the latter takes the lead in performance, comfort, and driving dynamics. Volvo was right to keep the ICE-powered XC90 in the lineup with thoughtful updates, but for those open to an electric-only option, the newer EX90 makes the more compelling case – even with a higher price tag.

 We Drove Volvo’s Flagship XC90 And EX90 And Only One Really Impressed Us: Review

Photos: Thanos Pappas for CarScoops

The 2025 Audi SQ6 e-tron Had Me Grinning On The Road Then Fuming At The Charger: Review

PROS ›› Thrilling performance, tech-filled cabin, quick DC chargingCONS ›› Expensive, inefficient, no active lane centering

Audi models with the S badge sure as special. Sure, they aren’t as quick or as thrilling as RS-badged models, but they offer a good mix of performance, comfort, luxury, and premium German build quality.

One of the more recent additions to Audi’s range of S-branded models is the SQ6 e-tron. First unveiled last year, it sits atop the all-electric Q6 e-tron family and serves as a rival to the likes of the Porsche Macan 4S, Mercedes-AMG EQE 53, and even lower-end versions of the Lotus Eletre.

Does the SQ6 e-tron feel fitting of the S badge and is it a legitimate top contender in its segment? To find out, I recently spent a week living with a blacked-out example. It revealed itself to be a strong all-rounder, but it did have a few niggles.

QUICK FACTS
› Model:2025 Audi SQ6 e-tron
› Starting Price:AU$151,400 (~$98,200)
› Dimensions:4,771 mm (187.8 in.) Length
1,939 mm (76.3 in.) Width
1,675 mm (65.9 in.) Height
2,899 mm (114.1 in) Wheelbase
› Curb Weight:2,425 kg (5,346 lbs)*
› Powertrain:Dual-electric motor / 100 kWh battery
› Output:510 hp (380 kw) / 423 lb-ft (580 Nm)
› 0-62 mph4.3 seconds*
› Transmission:Single-speed
› Efficiency: 22.4 kWh/100 km as tested
› On Sale:Now
*Manufacturer
SWIPE
\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The Powertrain

In Australia, prices for the 2025 Audi SQ6 e-tron start at $151,400 (~$98,200), while in the US, it’s available from $72,900. On paper, the specs are very impressive.

All SQ6 e-tron variants, regardless of market, come standard with a 100 kWh lithium-ion battery pack which sends power to a pair of electric motors that combine to produce 360 kW (483 hp), or 380 kW (510 hp) with launch control enabled. The front motor also delivers 275 Nm (203 lb-ft) of torque, while the rear motor is good for 580 Nm (423 lb-ft). According to Audi, the SQ6 e-tron can run to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 4.3 seconds, or 60 mph (96 km/h) in 4.2 seconds.

Audi says the SQ6 e-tron can average between 17.5 – 18.6 kWh/100 km over the combined cycle and is good for a WLTP range of 568 km (353 miles). However, as I found out, both of those claims seem extremely ambitious.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A Cabin Dominated By Screens

The SQ6 e-tron has Audi’s latest generation of interior, also featured in the new Audi A5 models. It has both its strengths and weaknesses.

Immediately standing out are the three massive screens. An 11.9-inch digital instrument cluster and a 14.5-inch MMI infotainment screen are housed within a curved panel, while a 10.9-inch touchscreen is positioned in front of the passenger.

Read: Audi’s Electrifying Crossover Coupe Arrives With A 509 HP Range-Topper

Like other Audi models sporting s virtual cockpit, the cluster is highly configurable and one of the best in the business. Similarly, the central infotainment screen is excellent, well shielded from the sun and provides snappy responses to inputs thanks to the Android Automotive operating system it uses; moreover, it also includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard.

\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

The passenger screen offers plenty of functions, too, like displays for the navigation, entertainment system, and passenger-specific settings, including for the massaging seats. Speaking of the seats, they are trimmed in beautiful leather with electric adjustment and heating. However, the lack of ventilation seems like a glaring omission at this price point.

Elsewhere, the SQ6 e-tron comes standard with plush Alcantara across the central part of the dashboard and door cards. On the downside, other than the Alcantara and the fancy capacitive switchgear on the driver door for the lights, mirrors, and seat settings, the doors feel cheap. They are clad primarily in hard black plastic. Audi hasn’t even bothered to redesign the door handle trimming, leaving a blank plastic button that in older models housed the door lock and unlock buttons. I was also disappointed not to find any metallic speaker grilles, particularly since the model we tested came with a fancy Bang & Olufsen system.

 The 2025 Audi SQ6 e-tron Had Me Grinning On The Road Then Fuming At The Charger: Review

The same piano black console is featured as in other new Audis. As we’ve come to expect, it looks nice when it’s clean, but it is prone to scratches. The steering wheel also has capacitive buttons that are a nightmare to get used to. On the plus side is a nice ambient lighting system that extends beneath the base of the windshield, comes with a charging display and even flashes when you switch on an indicator.

Overall, space and comfort in the front are good, but it’s obvious some cost-cutting measures have been made. The second row offers plenty of space and feels very airy thanks to the panoramic glass sunroof. But it’s a shame that climate control settings at the rear are limited to switches for the heated seats and fan speed controls.

Audi says the SQ6 e-tron can carry 526 liters (18.5 cubic-feet) of cargo in the rear, or 1,529 liters (53.9 cubic-feet) with the rear seats folded down. There’s also a small storage area in the frunk, but charging cables take up most of the available space.

\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Quick And Agile, Like An Audi S Should Be

With up to 380 kW (509 hp) on tap, it should come as no surprise that the SQ6 e-tron feels pretty nifty in a straight line. With launch control enabled, I was easily able to match the claimed 4.3-second sprint to 100 km/h (62 mph). Much like the RS e-tron GT, it feels as if it starts to pull harder the faster you’re going. However, unlike the e-tron GT, the SQ6 e-tron doesn’t have a two-speed transmission.

Accompanying the acceleration is a spaceship-like soundtrack when you’re in Dynamic mode, which took me by surprise the first time. Similarly, I was surprised to see that as you accelerate, the speed reading on the head-up display begins to zoom in and grow bigger, adding a fun piece of theater to the experience.

Nevertheless, as impressive as the SQ6 is in a straight line, it’s around corners where it really shines. Despite tipping the scales at a portly 2,425 kg (5,356 lbs), it handles incredibly well and feels very agile. This is no doubt due in large part to how brilliantly Audi has optimized the feel of the electric power steering, giving it the perfect amount of weight.Contributing to the SUV’s handling are the grippy Bridgestone T005 tires.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photo Credits: Brad Anderson/Carscoops

As with other Audi EVs, the SQ6 e-tron has paddle shifters behind the steering wheel to adjust the level of brake regeneration. For the most part, both the mechanical brakes and the regen work well. However, I frequently heard a clunking sound originating from the rear of the SUV when I quickly lifted off the throttle and touched the brakes, primarily when the SQ6 was still cold. It was a little disconcerting and should have been picked up during the vehicle’s development. It’s possible, though, that it was only something impacting the particular vehicle I tested.

Review: The Audi e-tron GT Is The Sports Sedan Electric Cars Forgot

Some of the driver-assistance systems also leave a little to be desired. For starters, unlike other markets, in Australia the SQ6 e-tron does not have any active lane centering. This is a glaring omission for a vehicle that costs AU$80,000 (~$51,800), let alone one that costs almost twice as much. Additionally, I experienced a couple of hiccups from the rear collision avoidance system when, while I was safely reversing into a parking space, it suddenly slammed on the brakes, seemingly thinking I was about to hit something, even though I wasn’t.

 The 2025 Audi SQ6 e-tron Had Me Grinning On The Road Then Fuming At The Charger: Review

Efficiency and Charging

Efficiency isn’t the SQ6 e-tron’s strong suit – not that that comes as much of a surprise. During my week with it, I averaged 22.4 kWh / 100 km,despite primarily driving in Efficiency mode with regen on full, and occasionally also driving in ‘B’ mode to enable one-pedal driving. That’s worse than the 21.4 kWh / 100 km I averaged in the Lotus Eletre a few months ago, despite it being larger, heavier, and having more power. This reduces the Audi’s real-world range closer to roughly 450 km (280 miles).

On the plus side, the SQ6 e-tron’s 800-volt architecture supports DC fast charging speeds of up to 270 kW. That means it can charge from 10-80 percent in just 21 minutes. It also comes with an AC fast charger that can plug into a standard household socket. However, Australian-delivered models include the installation of a 7kW home charger as part of the purchase price, plus a one-year Chargefox public charging subscription, so that’s a nice perk.

Much like the e-tron GT, Audi has also fitted charging flaps on both sides of the SQ6 e-tron, making public charging that little bit easier.

\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Verdict

From a performance standpoint, the SQ6 e-tron certainly feel like a true Audi Sport product. It’s seriously quick in a straight line and handles great for an SUV that weighs this much. Sure, it lacks the emotion of something like a petrol- or diesel-powered SQ5, but that’s part and parcel with high-performance EVs nowadays.

The dynamics are excellent, as is the steering and braking. Plus, you get the space and practicality that comes with an SUV. If all of the niggles were ironed out, it would be superb.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

PROS ›› Range and performance, comfortable ride, well-equipped CONS ›› Interior feels dated, no longer eligible for EV tax credit

When mainstream automakers finally embraced electric vehicles, many of their early efforts felt half baked. The issues varied by make and model, but a number of them had lackluster ranges, high prices, and an assortment of quirks.

Ford managed to avoid these pitfalls with the Mustang Mach-E, which launched in 2021 and was quickly named North American Utility Vehicle of the Year. We were also impressed with it as I originally called it a “good EV and a great crossover.” I went on to praise the styling, comfortable ride, impressive performance, and long range.

What’s New For 2025?

 Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

Fast forward four years, and the Mustang Mach-E is approaching middle age. However, the car doesn’t feel overly dated thanks to a series of updates over the years. The latest were announced last fall and saw the electric pony car equipped with BlueCruise 1.5 and a newly standard heat pump. The latter helps to optimize energy consumption in cold climates for more range.

Those are welcome developments and that’s just scratching the surface as the rotary shifter has been replaced by a new column-mounted stalk. It’s a nice change, although there are odd cubbies where the shifter used to reside.

Other updates are less notable, but the Premium trim gains ventilated front seats due to customer feedback. The model also sports an updated color palette, revised wheels, and a new Sport Appearance Package.

The latter is available on the Premium trim and it sees the crossover outfitted with the front fascia and grille from the Mustang Mach-E GT. Buyers will also find black accents, red Brembo front brake calipers, and 19-inch gloss black wheels. Rounding out the highlights are sport pedals and red contrast stitching.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Michael Gauthier / Carscoops

These build on earlier improvements, which saw the model benefit from faster DC recharging times and a new lithium iron phosphate battery pack. The Mach-E also got a new Rally trim and a performance upgrade for the GT.

Given all the improvements over the years, it’s surprising the 2025 model is cheaper than its predecessor. Back in 2021, pricing began at $42,895. Today, it starts at $37,995 before a $1,995 destination fee. That’s pretty remarkable, but there’s a big caveat as the Mach-E is no longer eligible for federal tax credits.

Still Great, But Its Age Is Starting To Show

 Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

Despite the passage of time, the Mach-E still feels competitive. It still looks great, offers impressive performance, and has plenty of space for four adults. The model also offers a comfortable ride, excellent steering, and a hushed demeanor.

Unfortunately, the interior is starting to feel dated and the quality still leaves something to be desired. That being said, even the entry-level model comes equipped with a 10.2-inch digital instrument cluster and a 15.5-inch infotainment system with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. They’re joined by a wireless smartphone charger, an eight-way power driver’s seat, and a six-speaker audio system. Rounding out the highlights are leather-like ActiveX upholstery, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, and a universal garage door opener.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Michael Gauthier / Carscoops

Higher-end variants up the ante with heated and ventilated front seats as well as a heated steering wheel. Customers can also get a 10-speaker B&O premium audio system as well as multi-color ambient lighting.

The new model comes standard with the Co-Pilot360 Active 2.0 suite of driver assistance systems. It includes Adaptive Cruise Control, Automatic Emergency Braking, and Lane Centering. There are also Automatic High Beam headlights, a Lane-Keeping System, and a Blind Spot Information System with Cross-Traffic Alert. Other highlights include a 360° camera system, Evasive Steering Assist, Front/Rear Parking Sensors, and Intersection Assist.

A Powertrain For Everyone

 Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

The 2025 Mustang Mach-E is available with three different battery packs that have capacities of 73, 88, and 91 kWh. They allow for ranges of between 240 and 320 miles (386 and 515 km).

Customers will also find an assortment of rear- and all-wheel drive systems. Rear-wheel drive models have outputs of 264 hp (197 kW / 268 PS) and 272 hp (203 kW / 276 PS), while dual-motor, all-wheel drive variants develop 325 hp (242 kW / 330 PS), 370 hp (276 kW / 375 PS) or 480 hp (358 kW / 487 PS). The various outputs allow for 0-60 mph (0-96 km/h) times of between 3.3 and 5.6 seconds.

Those numbers are still pretty competitive today as the 2026 Toyota bZ will be offered with 57.7 and 74.7 kWh battery packs that provide up to 314 miles (505 km) of range. The model also has upgraded outputs of 221 hp (165 kW / 224 PS) and 338 hp (252 kW / 343 PS), which will allow for 0-60 mph (0-100 km/h) times of as little as 4.9 seconds.

 Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

A bigger threat is the Chevrolet Equinox EV, which starts at $33,600 and is eligible for a $7,500 federal tax credit. That makes it hugely appealing, even if its outputs of 220 hp (164 kW / 223 PS) and 300 hp (224 kW / 304 PS) aren’t anything to write home about. It’s also hard to knock the ranges of 285 and 319 miles (459 and 513 km).

Speaking of the bowtie brand, they also offer the larger Blazer EV for $44,600. While it’s more expensive, the model is eligible for a $7,500 tax credit and that knocks it down into Mach-E territory. It offers front-, rear-, and all-wheel drive as well as outputs ranging from 220 hp (164 kW / 223 PS) to 615 hp (459 kW / 624 PS). Customers can also expect up to 334 miles (538 km) of range.

All of this means the Mach-E is still pretty competitive, although not quite the standout it used to be. Of course, that’s what happens with age, and a facelift is likely coming soon.

 Ford’s Electric Pony Car Gets Better With Age: Quick Drive

Photos Michael Gauthier / Carscoops

I Drove Stellantis’ Chinese Electric SUV That Rivals Tesla For Just $30K

PROS ›› Excellent interior, posh looks, well-pricedCONS ›› Powertrain can feel laggy, poor fuel efficiency, bouncy ride

Many of the new electric car manufacturers emerging from China are sub-brands of major conglomerates, such as Geely, Chery, GAC, and GWM, among others. Leapmotor is a little different. Just like Nio and Xpeng, it was formed as an independent startup in 2015, eager to crack into the then-emerging electric vehicle space.

That independence shifted somewhat in 2023, when Stellantis acquired a 20 percent stake in the company for $1.8 billion. The following year, the two formed a joint venture, giving the group a 51 percent share and exclusive rights to export, sell, and build Leapmotor EVs outside China.

The brand’s first model, the S01, was unveiled in late 2017, and like so many other Chinese cars launched before 2020, it wasn’t what anyone would consider desirable. However, the EV space has made significant progress since then, as has Leapmotor, which now boasts several interesting models in its lineup. One of them is the C10.

First unveiled in late 2023, the C10 arrived in Europe and Australia in late 2024, serving as a direct rival to the Tesla Model Y, Geely EX5, and Kia EV5. Can it possibly be any good?

QUICK FACTS
› Model:2025 Leapmotor C10
› Starting Price:AU$45,888 (about US$30,100)
› Dimensions:4,739 mm (199.9 in.) Length
1,900 mm (76.1 in.) Width
1,680 mm (75 in.) Height
2,825 mm (112.2 in) Wheelbase
› Curb Weight:1,995 kg (5,743 lbs)*
› Powertrain:Rear electric motor / 69.9 kWh battery
› Output:215 hp (160 kW) and 236 lb-ft (320 Nm)
› 0-62 mph7.5 seconds*
› Transmission:Single-speed
› Efficiency:17 kWh/100 km as tested
› On Sale:Now
*Manufacturer
SWIPE
\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Any new entrant into the EV market has to be priced competitively if it wants buyers to take notice, so it’s a good thing Leapmotor has done just that with the C10. In Australia, it’s sold with a single EV powertrain and a newly-launched range-extender EV option, combining a 28.4 kWh battery and a 1.5-liter petrol engine. We recently lived with the flagship C10 Design with the BEV powertrain.

Prices for the EV start at AU$45,888 (~$30,100) for the entry-level Style and rise to AU$49,888 (~$32,800) for the C10 Design, before on-road costs. Factor those in, and you’re looking at around AU$55,000 (~$36,100). That undercuts the base Kia EV5 by about AU$2,000 (~$1,300) and the Tesla Model Y by nearly AU$10,000 (~$6,600).

All BEV C10 feature the same 69.9 kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery and a single electric motor. This motor delivers 215 hp (160 kW) and 236 lb-ft (320 Nm) of torque. It drives the rear wheels, unlike the single-motor Kia EV5, which is front-wheel drive. Leapmotor quotes a driving range of 420 km (261 miles) on a charge, which is okay, but not great. Charging is sub-par, as DC rates max out at 84 kW, meaning you’ll need 30 minutes to charge from 30-80%.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

A Typical EV Cabin

The interior of the Leapmotor C10 is just about as minimalist as you can get. Just like a Tesla, as well as pretty much every other new EV coming out of China, the cabin is dominated by a large central infotainment display that measures 14.6 inches and is joined by a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster.

The infotainment system is excellent. While it frustratingly doesn’t support Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, the software is very quick and offers every function you could ever dream of. You can choose from a variety of backgrounds, access important interior and exterior functions directly from the screen, and use it to adjust features like the wing mirrors. Just like a Tesla, then.

Leapmotor’s designers have also adopted the Tesla approach in not adding any physical buttons, switches, or dials, which is a shame. So, you have to dive into the screen to change things like the HVAC settings, which can be a nuisance on the move. It also leaves the interior feeling very bland and lacking in personality.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Simple, Yet Plush

With that being said, Leapmotor’s choice of materials at this price point has to be commended. The dashboard, seats, door panels, center console, and floating console are all trimmed in smooth synthetic leather that certainly feels more premium than some of the scratchy plastics found in Kia’s EV5. However, the orange finish of our test vehicle was a little too bright for our taste.

Other welcome touches include a wireless phone charger, some metallic speaker grilles, and a panoramic glass roof, which, unlike in a Tesla, includes a sunshade. Overall, the cabin feels very spacious, and there’s plenty of leg and headroom for adults in the second row. However, I wasn’t a fan of the front seats as they lacked any form of lumbar support. On the other hand, the seats do have heated and ventilated functions, which is a plus.

Elsewhere, all C10 models come with a solid 12-speaker audio system, DAB+ digital radio, a heated steering wheel, configurable ambient lighting, and rear privacy glass. There’s also a voice assistant you can ask to open the windows or the sunshade.

 I Drove Stellantis’ Chinese Electric SUV That Rivals Tesla For Just $30K

Security Quirks

You can gain access to the C10 in one of two ways. The first option is to use the provided keycard and tap it on the driver’s side wing mirror. The second (and easier) option is to sync the car with the Leapmotor app, meaning it’ll automatically unlock when your phone approaches and lock it when you leave.

Review: Why The Kia EV5 Makes More Sense Than A Model Y

To start the C10, you must either place the keycard on the charging pad or enter a PIN code. This may seems like an unnecessary step. After all, if the keycard is already inside, why does it need to be placed on an NFC reader? It does, however, provide a second level of security, in case a bad actor scans your keycard’s frequency to get access to unlock the car and get access to the cabin.

Once the startup procedure is done, it’s just like pulling away in plenty of other EVs, as there’s no Start/Stop button. Pull the column shifter into Drive or Reverse, and you’re away. It all works very smoothly, but perhaps the only downside is that while you can pull away within seconds, the infotainment screen takes around 10 seconds to load.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

Driving the C10 for the first time, I was impressed with the visibility and the smoothness provided by the throttle and brake pedals. However, I was shocked by how remarkably the light steering is in its Comfort setting. You can literally steer the C10 with a single finger. Some may like that, but others won’t. I quickly switched the weight of the steering into Sport mode and much preferred it. Then the chimes started.

Not-So-Safety Systems

Like so many other vehicles we’ve tested from China, some of the C10’s safety and warning systems can become tiresome. For one, the driver monitoring system will start ringing if you look at the central display for a couple of seconds, or even glance in the mirror. I performed an over-the-air software update during my time with the C10 that should have fixed this, but didn’t.

The warnings don’t stop there. There’s an overbearing speed limit warning known as the ‘Intelligent Speed Assistance.’ Plenty of other cars have these warnings nowadays, but most only start ringing when you exceed the speed limit by a certain margin. In the C10, a woman’s voice blares through the speakers, telling you you’ve just exceeded the posted speed limit by 2 km/h. The lane warning and emergency lane warning assistant features are also prone to mistakes, chiming even if you’re right in the center of the lane.

 I Drove Stellantis’ Chinese Electric SUV That Rivals Tesla For Just $30K

Fortunately, all of these systems can be disabled in the settings, but you’ll have to do it every time you get behind the wheel, which is not ideal. It’s also wise to disable the live traffic setting in the built-in navigation system because if it detects that there’s traffic merging from the left or the right, the woman’s voice returns, nagging you again each and every time.

The Good

Once these systems are disabled, the C10 actually reveals itself to be a very good all-rounder. It has been well damped for a heavy SUV, ironing out bumps valiantly and remaining surefooted regardless of the road surface. I also liked the rear-wheel drive setup, as it means the C10 doesn’t suffer from any of the torque steer of the Kia EV5.

Leapmotor offers Eco, Comfort, Sport, and Custom drive modes, as well as a one-pedal driving. I found Eco to be far too docile, as you really have to plant your foot on the throttle for it to start moving. Sport was my pick. Frustratingly, the one-pedal mode can only be engaged when you’re stopped and place the C10 into Park, so it’s not something you can enable on the fly like in many other EVs.

Cruising around town in the C10 is a delight. It’s whisper quiet at slow speed and feels smaller than it really is. A slight annoyance is that above 70 km/h (43 mph) or so, a faint whistling sound starts to slightly intrude into the cabin, perhaps from the roof rails. But if you’re listening to music, you won’t notice it at all.

Efficiency is good, but certainly not class-leading. Leapmotor quotes 19.8 kWh/100 km, but I averaged 17 kWh/100 km during my time with it. As mentioned, DC charging is below average, topping out at a peak of just 84 kW. But for those who can charge at home, that won’t be much of an issue.

 I Drove Stellantis’ Chinese Electric SUV That Rivals Tesla For Just $30K

Verdict

Leapmotor does have quite a mountain to climb. It must produce vehicles to not only rival brands within long-standing, and thus much more experienced, Chinese conglomerates but also several legacy automakers. It has, nevertheless, done a good job with this model.

While the range and the charging leave a little to be desired, the C10 does what an EV should. It’s comfortable, easy to drive, spacious, and feels fresh and modern. However, those shopping for a vehicle with personality will be disappointed, as the C10 lacks it. Then again, the same can be said for most EVs these days, as driver engagement is not exactly a priority for either buyers or manufacturers and cars like Hyundai’s Ioniq 5 N are the exception, not the norm.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Photos Brad Anderson/Carscoops

❌