In a political tug-of-war that’s been playing out for a long time, the battle between Donald Trump and California over vehicle emissions has landed back in the spotlight. The US president has now taken formal action to reverse California’s aggressive push toward electric vehicles and clean air regulations, signing a trio of resolutions that target the state’s authority on the matter.

With these resolutions, the President is effectively blocking California’s plan to phase out gas-powered cars by 2035. The move also eliminates federal support for the state’s plans to retire medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks, and strips California’s ability to enforce its own tailpipe emissions and nitrogen oxide pollution limits.

Read: Trump’s Big Beautiful Tesla Just Got Fired

Trump has pushed back on California’s environmental authority since his first term, and with these latest actions, the battle is now heading to court.

“We officially rescued the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating the California electric vehicle mandate once and for all,” he said during a White House news conference.

Unsurprisingly, the move has both supporters and detractors. In a statement, the president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an important representative of major car manufacturers, applauded Trump’s move. “Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic,” he said.

California Hits Back

Almost immediately after Trump signed the bills, California Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit, the New York Times reports, describing them as “illegal resolutions.”

“Trump’s all-out assault on California continues – and this time he’s destroying our clean air and America’s global competitiveness in the process,” Newsom said. “We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters.”

California’s ability to set its own emissions standards dates back to the Nixon administration. The state is home to five of the ten cities with the worst air pollution in the United States. According to the governor’s office, clean air efforts over the past 50 years have saved $250 billion in health costs through reduced illness.

Attorney General Bonta echoed the urgency, calling the resolutions a reckless rollback. “The President is busy playing partisan games with lives on the line and yanking away good jobs that would bolster the economy – ignoring that these actions have life or death consequences for California communities breathing dirty, toxic air,” he said. “I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: California will not back down. We will continue to fiercely defend ourselves from this lawless federal overreach.”

Kia’s midsize truck, the Tasman, is just getting started and is expected to stick around for quite a while, according to a high-ranking company official. However, it won’t remain frozen in time. Along the way, it’ll see upgrades including, in all likelihood, a styling refresh and, more notably, hybrid and fully electric variants.

More: Kia Confirms First Midsize Pickup For America

The update comes via Roland Rivero, General Manager of Product Planning at Kia Australia. Speaking with CarExpert, Rivero described the Tasman’s ladder-frame chassis as a “fairly modular platform” that can accommodate “numerous powertrains.”

Hybrid and EV Versions on the Table

Depending on the market, the Tasman is currently offered with gasoline and diesel engines, but electrified versions are on the horizon. Rivero confirmed that Kia is actively “studying and reviewing” both hybrid and fully electric variants, though he stopped short of committing to a specific timeline for their launch.

One possible setup involves pairing the turbocharged 2.5-liter gasoline engine that’s available in the Korean market with a self-charging hybrid system, like what Hyundai is doing with the latest Palisade. Such a move could position the Tasman to compete directly with electrified midsize trucks like the BYD Shark and Ford Ranger Plug-in Hybrid.

As for the fully electric Tasman, expect a dual-motor setup providing all-wheel drive. This version would go up against the zero-emission trucks being developed by Toyota and Isuzu, including electric versions of the Hilux and D-Max.

Kia’s local head of Product Planning said the Tasman’s lifecycle will follow the typical pattern for light commercial vehicles, lasting “anywhere from 8 to 12 years.” To keep demand strong over that span, Kia plans to update and refine the midsize truck in a variety of ways.

Weekender Concept Shows What’s Possible

Some of those future styling updates might take cues from the recently revealed Tasman Weekender concept, which debuted at the 2025 Seoul Mobility Show. While Rivero emphasized that the Weekender is “just a concept” for now, he acknowledged that it could influence future updates, saying there’s “plenty of opportunity to enhance the Tasman” throughout its run.

More: New Kia Pickup Coming To America And It’s Nothing Like The Tasman

The concept gets wider, body-colored fenders, redesigned bumpers, a more pronounced hood, and chunkier tires over the production model. These could make their way into a tougher, off-road-oriented variant of the Tasman, a move in line with the growing popularity of factory-built rugged trucks, led by models like the Ford Ranger Raptor.

In any case, it appears that Kia has plenty of ideas about the future of the truck, enhancing its presence as a newcomer in this competitive segment. Until a facelift arrives, owners of the Tasman can rely on the numerous available accessories, tailored for different use-case scenarios.

America’s crumbling roads aren’t just a punchline anymore, they’re a $20 billion annual shortfall for the federal government, and lawmakers are now eyeing new ways to close the gap. One idea on the table? A national car fee that could, in theory, also help ease gas prices over time. But like most tax ideas these days, it’s already being shot down from inside the same party that introduced it.

The proposal comes from House Transportation Committee Chair Sam Graves, who wants to charge Americans an annual fee for simply owning and driving a car. The amount would vary by vehicle type, ranging from $20 a year for standard passenger cars to $200 for electric vehicles. Hybrids would fall in the middle at $100. The long-term goal, according to Graves, is to eventually replace the federal gas tax altogether.

Read: Volvo Just Suspended Its Forecast After Tariffs And EV Headwinds Wrecked Q1

“Nearly 40 states already have a special registration fee for EVs. It is time for the federal government to assess a fee on EVs that, for years, have not paid gasoline or diesel taxes, the primary source of Highway Trust Fund revenues,” said Graves. He went on to point out that gas and diesel taxes haven’t changed since 1993. Since they’re not indexed to inflation, the government has lost out on some $480 billion in federal revenue.

Interestingly, the proposal would make it so that EV owners are essentially paying what equates to about 1,111 gallons of fuel annually based on the federal gas tax of $0.18. According to the Department of Energy, the average car uses around 430 gallons of gas per year. So, yes, EV drivers would be picking up a disproportionately large tab.

Not Everyone’s On Board

That said, the proposal sounds like it might die before making it very far, though. Chip Roy didn’t mince words about his view of it saying, “Are you out of your fricking mind? Like, the party of limited government is gonna go out and, ‘say we’re gonna have [a car tax]? You know what I was told? ‘Don’t worry about it. We’ll get rid of it later in the highway bill,” Roy continued.

According to Politico, the message he received is that the car tax is “a gimmick to pay for this, so we know that we’re not actually gonna pay for it. That’s how this town works.”

After a little math, AmericanProgress.org believes the proposal could cost Americans $7 billion a year and, of course, shrink the debt by that same amount. However, they also point out that the broader bill containing this proposal includes a hefty tax cut for the wealthiest Americans. Over a 10-year period, the top 0.1% of earners would see an average tax reduction of $278,000.

Whether this proposal is a genuine attempt to modernize road funding or just another political mirage, it forces a real question: who should foot the bill for the nation’s crumbling infrastructure in an era of rapid tech shifts and lopsided tax codes? If the answer ends up punishing EV adoption while letting wealth glide by untouched, expect this road to be anything but smooth.

Lead image Sen. Grave / Lucid

Bergen, Norway February 17th, 2025 — Since going into service in 2015, the MF Ampere has now sailed an astonishing distance equivalent to 17 times around the equator on batteries alone, solidifying its place as a groundbreaking achievement in sustainable maritime transport. A decade on and the Ampere continues to showcase the transformative potential of electric …

The post World’s first fully electric ferry celebrates 10 years of success appeared first on Alternative Energy HQ.

The international biofuels industry has found an unlikely ally in the waste management sector. A heightened global urgency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) is incentivizing renewable fuels production like never before, but the International Energy Agency (IEA) recently warned of an impending feedstock shortage for biodiesel, renewable diesel and biojet (aviation fuel) production, estimated …

The post Merging Net Zero With Zero Waste: One solution to biofuel feedstock shortage appeared first on Alternative Energy HQ.