For anyone even vaguely familiar with the current landscape, it’s clear that electric vehicles have quietly taken over the sensible side of driving. They’re smooth, quiet, efficient, and for most people, that’s exactly what daily driving should be. But for enthusiasts? Well, the story’s a little different. Most EVs just don’t hit the same nerve as a manual-equipped ICE car screaming through its rev range. Automakers know this too, and they’ve started tinkering. Ford, it seems, is the latest to join the “manual EV” experiment.

Toyota has been working on a simulated manual transmission for future EVs since at least 2022, and Hyundai has famously replicated a dual-clutch transmission in the popular Ioniq 5 N. Now, a recently published patent from Ford shows that it, too is developing a fake stick shift designed for EVs.

Watch: Toyota’s Six-Speed Manual For EVs Feels Just Like The Real Thing, Say Testers

The application, first filed in the US back in September 2023 before being published on March 20, surfaced publicly a couple of weeks ago, catching the attention of Jalopnik. It describes and depicts a shifter that uses several actuators, vertical drive posts, vertical guide posts, and motors to simulate gear shifts. While that all sounds very complex, what it means is that the shifter could be configured to simulate any kind of H-pattern ‘box with different numbers of fake gears. In theory, the setup could also allow for simply sequential up and down shifting.

This isn’t just a novelty, either. Ford also mentions the use of haptic feedback to give drivers a more tactile experience. The patent even acknowledges the elephant in the room: EVs just don’t provide the same kind of physical connection that drivers get from combustion-powered cars. As Ford puts it, electric vehicles “lack operator to vehicle physical feedback that is advantageous in conventional motor vehicles.”

Will It Ever Hit the Road?

Of course, despite Ford making this patent application over 18 months ago, there’s no guarantee it will bring it into production. Adding a fake shifter would only make sense if the EV itself is a sporty model. After all, no one is going to buy an Explorer EV with a stick shift. However, if Ford does decide to eventually launch a true electric Mustang (not like the Mach-E…), or perhaps an electric hot hatch, it could be well-suited to a shifter like this. Until then, it’s likely a clever idea stuck in the theoretical lane.

Remember the outcry from enthusiasts when Ford unveiled the Mach-E in November 2019? They were worried Ford wanted to replace the iconic pony car with an EV but the automaker assured them that wasn’t going to happen. Five and half years later, however, fresh data from Ford shows it’s now the Mach-E that’s the sales winner and the gas-powered car that’s the niche proposition. Are we looking at the end of the road for the ‘real’ Mustang?

Ford’s registration figures reveal Mach-E sales grew 21 percent in Q1 2025 versus Q1 2024, the total number of deliveries jumping from 9,589 to 11,607, no doubt helped by incentives and the threat of federal tax credits going away. Still, that’s a healthy gain. While that was happening sales of the classic Mustang slid by 31.6 percent, dropping from 13,707 to 9,377. That means the Mustang EV is now more popular than the gas car, and by a wide margin.

Related: Ford Mach-E Sales 62% Up This Year, Mustang Keeps Losing To Itself

So modern electric vehicles good, retro-style gas cars bad, right? It’s not quite that simple, because sales of Ford’s F-150 Lightning EV dropped 7.2 percent in Q1 to 7,187 units, and Bronco registrations blew up by 35.4 percent to 32,595 units. The Bronco is now almost as popular as the more affordable Bronco Sport (33,363; up 5.7 percent) and Escape (37,357; up 2.1 percent).

Ford’s (combustion) F-series trucks also increased their sales by a whopping 24.5 percent to 190,389, helping Ford truck deliveries boom by 15 percent. But that wasn’t enough to prevent total sales of Ford-branded vehicles dropping 1.2 percent to 477,560 in the first quarter. Lincoln sales, by the way, dropped 4.7 percent to 23,731.

It’s said that the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and again and hoping for a different result. And it’s looking like Ford’s new-for-’24 Mustang didn’t really offer anything meaningfully new to help keep interest high. Sure, the $325k GTD is entering new territory, but the regular models didn’t.

Which isn’t to say they’re bad cars. We just drove a Mustang GT and found it great fun. But the sales figures prove buyers are looking elsewhere for their kicks at a time when the Mustang has almost no direct opposition, its Dodge (ICE) and Chevy rivals having both been axed.

What do you think is the answer to Ford’s Mustang sales crisis? Is it more power for the base cars, more frugal engines, a four-door coupe or maybe a lifted crossover body? Or should Ford have retired the Mustang at its 50th birthday and focused exclusively on improving the Mach-E and extending its family?

Ford sales Q1 2024 vs Q1 2025

It’s no secret that Tesla has become something of a cultural lightning rod, whether for its tech, its CEO, or the political baggage that now seems welded to its aluminum panels. And in the current climate, even scratching a Tesla could apparently land you in serious legal territory, at least in Washington, D.C., where the politics are as tangled as the city’s traffic circles.

Read: Trump Vows To Buy A Tesla After ‘Radical Left Lunatics’ Boycott Brand

Elon Musk and Tesla have grown so closely associated with the Trump-era political ecosystem that some officials in the nation’s capital are reportedly considering whether vandalism against the brand could be prosecuted as a hate crime. D.C. has long been a Democratic stronghold, but Mayor Muriel Bowser appears to be making moves in response to mounting pressure from the Trump administration, particularly after Trump’s recent threat to assert control over the District.

Last week, D.C.’s Metropolitan Police issued a press release announcing they are searching for two suspects who allegedly defaced Tesla vehicles in the district. According to the authorities, they “wrote political hate speech on to the victims’ Tesla vehicles then fled the scene.” The exterior cameras of the cars caught clear images of both suspects, although they were wearing sunglasses.

Vandalism, But Make It Political

Unlike some incidents elsewhere in the country, the Teslas weren’t torched, overturned, or otherwise wrecked. The damage was cosmetic, limited to what amounts to political graffiti. What’s perhaps the strangest thing about the whole situation is that much of the “hate speech” graffiti on the cars wasn’t even that dramatic.

According to Politico, which reviewed police reports, several sarcastic messages were left on the Teslas. These included statements like “Let’s do away with the administrative state! Buy a tesla!” while another said, “Go Doge I support Musk killing the dept of education.”

Another read, “I like what Musk is doing,” while one stated, “I Love Musk and hate the Fed Gov.t.” Possibly the most provocative was: “Ask me about my support of Nazis.” It’s a grab bag of chaotic energy, part satire, part performance art, part political Rorschach test.

Washington D.C. is one of just a few jurisdictions that describe “political affiliation,” with race, sex, and religion as categories of bias, meaning locals cannot discriminate against someone for being a Democrat or Republican. However, that doesn’t mean you can’t shun someone for their opinion.

“I would have a hard time seeing how anti-Elon Musk graffiti would constitute political affiliation discrimination,” Arizona State University law professor Michael Selmi said. “The real issue is there’s very little case law interpreting political affiliation in D.C. or in the few other jurisdictions that include it.”

Anyone who scrawls a swastika on a Tesla has obviously committed a hate crime https://t.co/EJFkYxDHrV

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2025

Another Tesla Cybertruck has been wrecked, and this time it’s not because it’s been attacked by vandals angry at the automaker’s CEO Elon Musk, or due to some alleged failure of the driver-assist systems. Instead, a Mercedes-Benz G-Wagen was the culprit after its driver reportedly suffered a medical emergency, plowing into no fewer than seven vehicles. The Cybertruck took the worst of it, with its bed ripped clean off in the chaos.

Footage and images from the scene show a dark-colored Cybertruck brandishing promotional graphics for Keane Landscaping (they say there’s no such thing as bad publicity, right?) cut in half in the road outside the Dallas Cowboys HQ.

Related: Someone Egged A Cybertruck And Wiped Dog Poop On It

The front end of the truck appears untouched, but everything behind the rear seats is gone, including the bed, frame, and the suspension, motor, and wheels, which can all be seen lying several feet away. Of the eight vehicles involved in the smash, the Cybertruck definitely came off worst, but that doesn’t mean the other cars which, like the Tesla, were all parked and unoccupied, didn’t take some serious hits.

A Ford Mustang, F-series truck, Hyundai Santa Fe, Tesla sedan, and others received major panel damage, but spare a thought for the Mercedes G-wagon, which was given such a smack it was flipped onto its roof and can be seen being righted in CBS’s video.

Police say the accident in Frisco, Texas, was the result of the Mercedes G-Wagen driver suffering a medical episode while behind the wheel last Friday, driving at the intersection of Avenue of the Champions and Cowboys Way. The driver was taken to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries, according to news reports, and won’t be charged with any driving offenses.

Looking at the amount of damage caused, he must have really hoofed that right pedal, with disastrous, but thankfully not fatal consequences. We imagine that in the future, car safety systems might be able to spot and prevent accidents like this, but until that happens, you might want to stay clear of powerful trucks with super-fast acceleration and curb weights flirting with the 6,000-pound mark, especially if you’re on foot.

Image credit: Dianne Everett/CBS News

The $7,500 federal EV tax credit has given many Americans a financial nudge to go electric, but the program hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing. While the credit can now be applied directly at the point of sale, some dealerships have been dragging their feet on the process, leaving buyers high and dry without the discount they were promised. But, good news: there’s a fix in the works.

Read: Dealers’ Paperwork Errors Are Costing Buyers Their EV Tax Credits With The IRS

It turns out that while the rebate is available at purchase, dealers have to be enrolled in the program and use a portal to submit their EV sales report within three days of the transaction for the credit to go through. Miss that deadline, and the rebate? Poof. Gone.

The IRS Steps In with a Lifeline

Fortunately, the IRS is stepping up to the plate. According to the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), the agency is essentially hitting the reset button on the 3-day reporting rule. Now, dealers can submit reports for any qualifying clean vehicle credit transaction from 2024, even if it happened earlier in the year.

According to NADA, the IRS updated the portal earlier this week, making it fully operational for dealers. The good news here isn’t just for car buyers, it’s a win for dealerships, too. Some dealers had been offering the tax credit upfront to customers at the point of sale, only to later realize they hadn’t secured the actual rebate yet.

NADA says it “advocated aggressively for the IRS to remedy these issues” and even went so far as to send a formal letter to both the U.S. Department of Treasury and the IRS, urging them to address the problem quickly and implement a timely solution.

With the Trump administration set to impose 25% tariffs on all cars made overseas starting April 2, the tax credit is perhaps more valuable now than at any other time for consumers. These new tariffs are expected to drive up the cost of both new and used cars, possibly adding thousands to the price tag. So, for many buyers, that $7,500 credit is about to get a lot more valuable.

After committing a hefty $21 billion investment into its US operations, including the construction of a new $5.8 billion steel plant, Hyundai has officially kicked off production at its Metaplant in Georgia. The site, which began construction over two and a half years ago, will focus on producing a range of electric and hybrid vehicles, boosting Hyundai’s push into the EV market.

The Grand Opening of the site was attended by Hyundai leaders, as well as Governor Brian P. Kemp, US Representative Buddy Carter, and the president and chief executive of the Kia Corporation, Ho Sung Song. The Metaplant has already started building the electric Hyundai Ioniq 5 and, perhaps most importantly, is now also building the Hyundai Ioniq 9.

Read: New Hyundai Ioniq 9 Lands With Three-Rows And Massive 110.3 kWh Battery

Hyundai’s Ioniq 9 is its first three-row electric SUV and serves as its alternative to the Kia EV9. Presented last November, the Ioniq 9 is underpinned by the group’s E-GMP architecture and fitted as standard with a 110.3 kWh battery. The brand has yet to announce US pricing for the SUV, but we know it will be offered in several different guises.

The base model has a 214 hp and 258 lb-ft (350 Nm) electric motor driving the rear wheels and a quoted range of 385 miles (620 km). Sitting above this version is the Long Range AWD, which adds a 94 hp motor up front. The flagship Ioniq 9 Performance has 214 hp motors at the front and rear, allowing it to hit 62 mph (100 km/h) in 5.2 seconds.

Initially, the Hyundai Motor Group planned to build 200,000 electric and hybrid vehicles at the Metaplant. However, as part of its increased commitment to the US market, it’s expanded annual production capacity up to 500,000 units.

“Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant America not only represents the Group’s advanced manufacturing capabilities and commitment to innovation, but also our investment in relationships with our partners and communities right here in Georgia,” Hyundai Motor Group executive chair Euisun Chung said. “With the rich history of craftsmanship and manufacturing in this community, together with the talented workforce at HMGMA we are building the future of mobility with America, in America.”

Dodge gave members of the public their first opportunity to see the four-door Charger Daytona last weekend at SpringFest 2025 in Southern California. The automaker has released several images of the car in the past, but this is our first chance to see it up close and painted in a special shade of blue known as Bludicrous.

While the new two-door Charger could be best viewed as a replacement to the Challenger, the four-door is a direct successor to the previous-gen Charger. No, it will not be sold with a V8, and we will have to make do with an electric powertrain or, for those yearning for an ICE, a twin-turbocharged six.

Read: Does The 2025 Dodge Charger Sedan Outmuscle Its Predecessor In Style?

While we don’t mind the shape of the two-door Charger, the doors do look a little too small and the space between the doors and the rear wheels is way too big. Fortunately, the proportions of the four-door Charger Daytona look a little nicer, and this paint color is spectacular. It could look even better with a widebody kit, but we’ll likely have to wait some time for Dodge to launch such a model.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Spring Fest | SFLX25 (@springfestivallx)

Customer deliveries for the four-door Charger were initially scheduled to start in Q1 2025, but production has been delayed until May, with the car launching for the 2026 model year.

In addition to showcasing this Bluedicrous Charger, Dodge brought along the black and red two-door model it previewed last week. It is bathed in black with matte black racing stripes with hundreds of small Fratzog logos and red pin stripes. Dodge’s online configurator doesn’t include these stripes, which is a shame, as we think they suit the car nicely and could be popular among shoppers if they were available.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Spring Fest | SFLX25 (@springfestivallx)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by LX & Beyond Nationals | LXBN (@lxandbeyondnats)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Spring Fest | SFLX25 (@springfestivallx)

Lead image Springfestivallx / Instagram

With the Rivian R1S starting at $75,900 in the United States, it’s safe to say no one expected it to rival the volume of more affordable, everyday EVs. But in January, the R1S managed to secure a surprisingly impressive spot as the fifth-best-selling new EV in the country, placing it alongside some pretty elite company.

Rivian itself does not release monthly sales figures, but according to data from Cox Automotive, the only EVs to outsell the R1S were the Tesla Model Y, Tesla Model 3, Ford Mustang Mach-E, and Honda Prologue. While exact sales figures for these models weren’t revealed, the data shows that Rivian moved more than 4,000 vehicles in February.

Review: The 2025 Rivian R1S Is An Imperfect But Promising Look At The Future

It comes as no shock that Tesla continues to dominate the EV market, but its grip is loosening ever so slightly. In February, overall Tesla sales fell by 10%, largely due to a steep 32.5% drop in Cybertruck deliveries and 17.5% fewer Model 3s sold. Even the best-selling Model Y saw a modest dip of 3.1%. It’s clear that the company’s previous growth spurt may be slowing down, but they’re still in the driver’s seat.

Looking at the US market more broadly, new EV sales declined slightly in February with 95,692 total sales. This was a 5.9% fall from January 2025 but up 10.5% from February last year. Similarly, used EV sales dropped 4.7% from January, but soared 34.2% from February 2024 to 24,875 units, representing 1.7% of all used cars sold. The market share of new EVs sold fell slightly to 7.7%.

When it comes to the used EV market, Tesla continues to reign supreme, accounting for a dominant 39.9% of all used EV sales last month, although its sales dipped by 9.2% compared to January.

On average, new and used EVs continue to sell for more than their internal combustion engine counterparts. However, this is mainly due to the wider price range of ICE vehicles, which pulls their average transaction price down. EVs, by contrast, tend to be more expensive from the start, leading to a higher average.

More: These Are The Cars With The Highest And Lowest Depreciation After 5 Years

In February, the average transaction price (ATP) for a new EV was $55,273, reflecting a 3.7% increase from the previous year and notably higher than the ATP of a new ICE vehicle, which sat at $47,555. Used EVs aren’t much of a bargain either, with the average ATP for a used EV at $38,057, significantly more than the $33,134 ATP for a used ICE vehicle.

Infiniti, following in the footsteps of its parent company Nissan, has dropped several teasers of upcoming models, giving us a glimpse into its future plans. Among the highlights are a new SUV Coupe, a facelifted QX60, and (naturally) an electric SUV.

QX60 Facelift and New QX65

We’ll start with the the second-generation QX60, which made its debut in 2021 and shares its foundation with the Nissan Pathfinder. Based on official teasers and spy shots, we can expect a mid-cycle refresh later this year. The redesign will include a new front end with an illuminated badge and a few other styling tweaks. So, if you were hoping for a major overhaul, it’s not exactly here. But, hey, a fresh look is still a fresh look.

More: All The New Nissan Models Arriving By 2027, From Sentra To Frontier

Next up is the Infiniti QX65 crossover coupe, set to debut in 2026. It’ll come with split LED headlights and a sharply sloped roofline inspired by the original Infiniti FX. Positioned as a sleeker, two-row alternative to the QX60, the QX65 will likely be powered by the same turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine, producing 268 hp (200 kW / 272 PS).

On the larger end of the spectrum, the QX80 will get a Sport package in 2025. This facelifted version will likely give the flagship SUV a bit more edge, though it’s unclear just how “sporty” it will actually get. Either way, it’ll be offered in Latin America and the Middle East.

Electric SUV

Infiniti has also teased a fully electric SUV, which seems to be the production version of the Vision QX Inspiration concept from 2019. Set to arrive in 2028, the new model will incorporate Infiniti’s latest “Artistry in Motion” design language, along with a range of tech features that sound impressive in the press release.

What About The Long Promised Electric Sedan?

Interestingly, the electric sedan, based on the Vision Qe concept, was notably absent from the press release. Initially, this model was supposed to debut before the SUV, but now it looks like the timeline might have shifted past 2028. It could be that Infiniti has quietly pushed back its electric car rollout in response to the US market’s shifting tax credits under President Trump. Originally, the plan was for Infiniti to manufacture its electric vehicles in Canton, Mississippi.

Nissan

Earlier this month, Tesla sparked outrage among Canadian auto dealers after selling an astonishing 8,653 cars in just three days across four stores, which equates to roughly two cars per minute for three straight days, including the hours the stores were closed. The company then filed for C$43.1 million (US$30M) in rebates.

That all unfolded right before Canada ran out of cash in its EV rebate fund. The combination of factors led officials to wonder if Tesla gamed the system somehow. Now, the Canadian government is freezing payments to the  EV maker led by US presidential adviser Elon Musk, while it sorts everything out.

More: Tesla Accused Of Gaming Canada’s EV Rebate Program After 4 Stores Sold 2 Cars Per Minute Wiping Out $43M In Grants

Everyone suspected that, as funds in the EV rebate program dwindled, sales would rise a bit. That would be great for Tesla in Canada, especially since it was struggling to move cars early this year. But selling 8,653 cars in just three days? That’s not just a boost, it’s a bit of a red flag. Something felt off.

The Freeze and a Tariff Twist

On Tuesday, Canada’s Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland made the call to freeze C$43 million (equal to $30M at current exchange rates) worth of payments. “As soon as I became Transport Minister, I asked the department to stop all payments for Tesla vehicles in order to fully examine each claim individually and determine whether all are eligible and valid,” Freeland said in a statement to the Toronto Star. “No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid.”

But Freeland didn’t stop there.

“I also directed my department to change the eligibility criteria for future iZEV programs to ensure that Tesla vehicles will not be eligible for incentives so long as the illegitimate and illegal US tariffs are imposed against Canada” she added.

Freeland has also directed changes to eligibility criteria for future rebate programs, potentially making Tesla vehicles ineligible for subsidies until issues regarding U.S. tariffs are resolved.

By linking the issue to US tariffs, the Canadian government is addressing a situation that is largely beyond Tesla’s control, as tariff decisions are made at the national level. While the embattled CEO may have a close relationship with the American President, he doesn’t have the power to end the tariffs on his own. Currently, Trump is planning additional tariffs for April 2. However, he’s already backtracked and flip-flopped on his plans multiple times. Perhaps he’ll reconsider his strategy if Musk begins to feel the pressure.

A Sting for Local Dealers

Back in Canada, Freeland also mentioned that the government would reimburse more than 200 independently owned auto dealers who were left out of about CA$10 million after fronting rebates to customers without being able to file for reimbursement.

More: While Canada Fights Back Against Trump’s Auto Tariffs, Mexico Chooses Diplomacy Over Confrontation

Huw Williams, spokesman for the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association (CADA), welcomed the news.

“CADA has been shocked at the revelations that Tesla was somehow allowed to … take $43 million in rebates while locally owned dealers have been left holding the bag on funds advanced to customers on behalf of the federal government,” he told the Toronto Star. “While the news that Tesla payments are being frozen pending investigation is positive news, this should have happened months ago,” he added.

It’s worth mentioning that Elon Musk, who holds a Canadian passport and has sparked controversy by posting (and later deleting) on X that “Canada is not a real country,” has significantly benefited from Canadian EV rebates. Since 2019, Tesla has claimed $713 million in rebates, making it the largest recipient of these incentives by far.

The first US deliveries of the revamped Tesla Model Y ‘Juniper’ in Launch Edition trim only kicked off earlier this month, and already, one has met an untimely end in a crash. While it’s unclear whether the driver of this particular Model Y was responsible for the havoc it now finds itself in, there’s probably not much point in trying to rescue it. If anything, it might be better off as a donor car for parts.

Read: Tesla Has Less Than 50 Old Model Ys Left, Standard Juniper Launch Imminent

The electric vehicle is up for sale at Copart’s Houston, Texas, facility, which suggests it may never have strayed far from its birthplace in the Lone Star State. The driver’s side of the Model Y still looks spotless, but the same can’t be said for the passenger side, which is an absolute mess.

Major Damage

One of the Tesla’s front wheels has been torn off, complete with the hub, brake caliper, and brake disc, only leaving behind some suspension arms. The front quarter panel has also been destroyed and is covered in deep dents and scratches. Additionally, the front door has been ruined, as has the wing mirror.

Listings like this never provide details about how a vehicle ended up in such a sorry state, but it’s safe to assume this Model Y took a hefty hit because ripping off a wheel and hub like this doesn’t happen in a minor fender bender. Curiously, the impact does not appear to have triggered any of the Model Y’s airbags, which is a bit of a head-scratcher.

Photos Copart

On the bright side, the cabin appears to be in decent shape, although it could do with a thorough cleaning. A look at the car’s infotainment screen reveals it has just 197 miles (317 km) under its belt and was fitted with Full Self-Driving, which comes as standard on all Launch Edition trims.

The listing also confirms that the EV still powers on, which suggests that the battery pack and electric motors might have come through the crash relatively unscathed.

More: We Compare The New ‘Juniper’ To The Old Model Y Side-By-Side

So, if you had the money to pick up this wrecked Model Y, would you try your hand at fixing it and getting it back on the road, or would you strip it for parts and make some cash off the more valuable components?

So, if you had the cash to pick up this wrecked Model Y, would you attempt to repair it and get it back on the road, or would you strip it for parts and cash in on some of the pricier components? And just for kicks, how much do you think this thing is worth in its current state—keep in mind, the original MSRP was $59,990?

Photos Copart

Time is running out for anyone still holding out for the outgoing version of the Model Y—whether it’s for its looks or the eye-popping discounts that stretch to nearly $9,000. Tesla still has a few left, but as of now, there are fewer than 50 available across the US, signaling that the normal Model Y Juniper is likely just around the corner. Of course, that number’s been fluctuating since the weekend, bouncing between 40 and 190, so don’t get too comfortable yet.

Early adopters have already had a taste of the Model Y Juniper, but it’s been limited to the Launch Edition trim so far. And as you’d expect from something called “Launch Edition,” it’s not cheap. The base price of this version is $59,990. You’re paying a premium for all the extras—think special paint colors and the $7,500 Full Self-Driving option, which is bundled in at no extra charge. But hey, at least you get all the bells and whistles.

More: You Can Buy A New 470 HP Family Car That Out-Runs Most Sports Cars For $32K

Elsewhere in the world, the “normal” versions of the updated Model Y are already on sale. In the US, though, Model Y buyers have just two options: they can pay more for the fully-loaded Juniper Launch Edition, or snap up one of the old versions still lingering in Tesla’s inventory, since orders for the pre-facelift model are no longer being accepted.

According to Tesla-Info, there are just 43 pre-facelift cars left in the country and, logically, Tesla should be getting ready to launch the “normal” Model Y Juniper. No doubt, interested buyers will be happy about the news.

The updated Model Y is significantly nipped and tucked compared to the outgoing one. The footprint is nearly identical, but the exterior styling is dramatically different. The new car takes on much the same lighting design as the Cybertruck and the curves are a touch sleeker. The cabin has also been updated with higher-quality materials, more screens, LEDs, new ventilated front seats and more.

Read: 8 Years Later, Tesla’s Still Taking $50K Roadster Reservations Musk Promised For 2020

That said, if you’re still holding out for a deal on the older version, time is running short. As of now, there are no Standard Range versions left, but there are still 10 Long Range AWD models and 33 Performance variants scattered across the country, with discounts ranging from $1,610 to $8,750.

As we’ve pointed out before, the old 470 hp Model Y Performance is incredibly fast and very practical. And, for as little as $32K—if you qualify for the $7,500 federal tax credit, plus any additional state-level EV incentives—it’s essentially a steal for what you’re getting. So, if you’re on the fence, now might be the time to snag one before they’re gone, unless you absolutely have your heart set on the Juniper.

In a sign of how serious attacks on Tesla vehicles and Tesla-related property has now got, the FBI has waded into the furore. The Bureau this week issued a public alert over the violence, which the government says counts as domestic terrorism.

In an announcement titled ‘Individuals Target Tesla Vehicles and Dealerships Nationwide with Arson, Gunfire, and Vandalism,’ the FBI warns the American public about recent incidents that have occurred in at least nine states these past few months.

Related: Tesla Owners Are Selling Their Cars In Record Numbers Over Musk’s Politics

“These incidents have involved arson, gunfire, and vandalism, including graffiti expressing grievances against those the perpetrators perceive to be racists, fascists, or political opponents,” the alert says. “These criminal actions appear to have been conducted by lone offenders, and all known incidents occurred at night.”

The bureau gives no weight to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s claim that the attackers are being funded by leftist organizations and says the vandals are operating alone, not in coordinated groups. It warns members of the public to ‘exercise vigilance’ and be on the lookout for suspicious activity in areas where Tesla dealerships or facilities, such as depots, charging stations, and plants, are located. The alert asks anyone aware of a threat against Tesla to contact their local FBI field office.

For the past two months, we’ve become used to seeing and hearing media coverage of people spraying graffiti on Tesla cars, shooting them, and setting them on fire. Some of the automaker’s dealerships have also come in for similar treatment.

The attacks aren’t specifically related to Tesla itself but are the result of anger at CEO Elon Musk’s work for the new Trump administration. As head of the newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Musk has been responsible for thousands of federal employees losing their jobs.

Last week US Attorney General Pam Bondi announced charges against three people for the “violent destruction of Tesla properties” using Molotov cocktails. Around the same time, Musk revealed that Tesla was activating the camera-based Sentry Mode security system on all its parked cars in an effort to identify vandals.

Tesla owners are feeling the wrath of many people over Elon Musk’s political transformation and it appears a number of them have had enough. That’s according to new data, which has shown a surge in trade-ins.

Citing Edmunds data, Reuters is reporting that “Tesla cars from model year 2017 or newer accounted for 1.4% of all the vehicles traded in until March 15.” That’s up from 0.4% last year and marks a significant increase.

More: Used EV Prices Are Crashing and Tesla’s Leading the Way Down

CNBC noted this is a record level of Tesla trade-ins towards vehicles from other brands. So what’s behind the increase? There’s likely a variety of factors at play, including new competitors in the EV space.

Of course, there’s little doubt that Musk’s close association to President Trump and his status as de facto leader of the Department of Government Efficiency is also playing a role. Sheryl Crow famously ditched her Tesla and said “There comes a time when you have to decide who you are willing to align with.”

Attacks on Tesla dealerships have been grabbing headlines and U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi recently stated that “If you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.” However, Tesla owners have also been targeted by hate.

Multiple owners have reported being flipped off or sworn at, while other cases are far more serious. These involve actual vandalism, which can range from vehicles getting keyed to set on fire.

More: Hundreds Of Tesla EVs Pile Up In Canadian Parking Lots After Suspicious Sales Rush

Regardless of what’s behind the shift, Edmunds’ Jessica Caldwell said the change in “Tesla consumer sentiment could create an opportunity for legacy automakers and EV startups to gain ground.” In essence, those turned off by Musk could replace their EVs with models from competitors – which might be good news for the latter, but obviously not for Tesla which is not in the best of shapes when it comes to sales lately.

While you’ve been trying to keep your finances from going off the rails, luxury vehicles are having their moment again. Cox Automotive’s latest Kelley Blue Book report a rather surprising uptick in the number of people splurging on vehicles that cost six-figures.

If you’ve ever wondered just how deep some pockets are these days, prepare for a shock: luxury cars are flying off dealer lots, and you might feel a little behind if you don’t have at least $100K to throw down on a new ride.

More: Don’t Have $100K? Here Are 10 Cars That Will Make You Look Like A Million Bucks For Toyota Camry Money

In the first two months of 2025 alone, over 52,000 new vehicles priced above $100,000 were delivered in the USA. That’s an impressive 13% increase from the 46,000 sold last year, and a mind-boggling 333% spike compared to just five years ago, when only 12,000 six-figure cars were sold. So, it’s safe to say that many people aren’t just fantasizing about luxury anymore- they’re actually buying it.

Range Rover Leads the Pack

So, who’s winning the battle for six-figure supremacy? Somewhat surprisingly, the undisputed champion for 2025 is the Range Rover, which saw over 3,800 monthly sales in February alone. It seems that the British brand has secured its spot as the crown jewel of the six-figure crowd.

Erin Keating, an Executive Analyst at Cox Automotive, offered some perspective on the trend: “While affordability is a challenge for many households, six-figure vehicles continue to sell well and have experienced a four-fold increase in sales volume since early 2020.”

Keating also noted that the widening income gap is significantly influencing new vehicle sales trends, with high-income households and individuals with “prime” or “super prime” credit scores fueling much of the demand.

NEW-VEHICLE AVERAGE TRANSACTION PRICE

A Look at Average Transaction Prices

Now, let’s talk numbers, and specifically, the Average Transaction Price (ATP) for new vehicles. In February 2025, the Average Transaction Price (ATP) for a new vehicle was $48,039. That’s a 1.3% dip from January but still a 1% increase compared to the same time last year.

If you’re wondering which segments are pushing those ATPs above the $100K mark, look no further than the usual suspects: luxury full-size SUVs ($106,332), high-end luxury cars ($121,129), and high-performance vehicles ($121,322), all showing year-over-year growth. No surprises there, right?

Car Brands: Who’s Winning?

On the luxury brand front, Porsche takes the top spot with an ATP of $116,111 in February, which is 12% higher than last year. At the other end of the spectrum, Mitsubishi took the prize for the lowest ATP at $30,410, with Nissan not far behind at $32,262. So if you’ve been eyeing a luxury SUV or sports car, you now know who’s at the top of the price ladder.

More: Porsche May Add Another Gas-Powered SUV Next To Macan EV, Cayenne

For those who prefer a quieter ride with zero tailpipe emissions, electric vehicles are also in the mix. The average ATP for EVs in February stood at $55,273, down 1.2% from January but still up 3.7% from last year. EV incentives also saw a substantial rise, reaching an average of $8,162, the highest it’s been in over five years.

Keating also reflected on how much the overall automotive landscape has changed, noting, “February marks the five-year anniversary of the last ‘clean month’ of data prior to the global COVID pandemic that shifted the automotive landscape. Compared to February 2020, ATP is up 25% while incentives are down 13% and monthly sales are down 9%. Auto loan rates are higher now as well, making new-vehicle affordability a real challenge for most households.”

Average Transaction Prices Feb 2025 vs 2024

ATP VS INDUSTRY AVERAGE INCENTIVE SPEND AS % OF ATP

Lead image Urban Automotive

Tesla stock is down some 35 percent, protests against the company appear to be heating up, and vandals continue to target the EV maker’s showrooms and products. Meanwhile, as questions are raised about Elon Musk’s suitability as CEO of the firm, a political tug-of-war is attempting to right the ship in the background.

Now, the U.S. representative for Virginia has openly called for an investigation into how the Trump administration is “using taxpayer money to enrich the President’s inner circle,” as Rep. Gerry Connolly claims that there has been an ethics violation.

Buy, Buy, Buy?

The statement under scrutiny was uttered earlier this week when Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick made a reasonably pointed recommendation to the public: advising Americans to buy Tesla stock, likening its current share price to a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. This remark was made during an appearance on Jesse Watters Primetime on Fox News, where he was asked about the ongoing attacks on Tesla, including those targeting dealerships, charging stations, and even private cars.

Read: Tesla’s European Sales Are Down 45% Even As EV Market Surges 31% In 2025

“I think if you want to learn something on this show tonight, buy Tesla. It’s unbelievable that this guy’s stock is this cheap. It’ll never be this cheap again,” Lutnick said in a Wednesday interview on Fox News. He added: “I mean, who wouldn’t invest in Elon Musk? You gotta be kidding me.”

However, one problem with his recommendation is that Lutnick may stand to benefit. According to a report from Yahoo Finance, Lutnick’s former firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, upgraded Tesla stock the same day and has invested heavily in the company. Though Lutnick has officially divested from the firm, his sons now occupy senior roles there, and Cantor maintains a $425 price target on Tesla following a visit to the automaker’s AI data center and production line.

More: Photo Shows Trump Reading Tesla Sales Pitch From Musk’s New White House Pop-Up Store

While some high-profile Republicans have rallied to Musk’s defense — Trump himself showcased Teslas at the White House and purchased two models — others are beginning to call for a leadership shift. Ross Gerber, a longtime Tesla investor and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth Management, is now urging Musk to step down. “He is not running Tesla,” Gerber told Sky News. “The business has been neglected for too long.”

Calls For An Investigation

But now, Lutnick’s endorsement is drawing scrutiny of its own. Representative Gerry Connolly, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, has formally requested an investigation into Lutnick’s comments, arguing that a sitting Commerce Secretary encouraging the public to invest in a specific company—especially one tied so closely to the administration—crosses a clear ethical line.

More: Over 80 Tesla Cars Vandalized At Canadian Dealership In Possibly The Largest Attack Yet

“This is just the latest example of the Trump Administration using taxpayer resources to enrich the President’s inner circle,” Connolly wrote in a letter to the Department of Commerce’s acting general counsel, reported on by The Hill. He demanded Lutnick’s financial disclosures and internal communications related to the Fox interview, including emails with the White House, Office of Government Ethics, and other oversight bodies.

The investigation request follows a string of recent moves by the Trump administration to oust independent agency watchdogs and cut regulatory staffing—efforts Musk’s DOGE department has reportedly supported. Connolly accused Musk of using his dual role in government and the private sector to push through mass firings and deregulation while profiting handsomely from the chaos.

More: US Attorney General Goes After Tesla Attackers, 3 People Face Up To 20 Years In Prison

“Tesla is owned by an individual who has been given license by the President to slash and burn his way through the federal government,” Connolly wrote. “These ongoing violations of law require a response befitting of the level of abuse to deter further lawlessness and to ensure the American people that members of this Administration seek to serve all people rather than to enrich a select few.”

As the political spotlight burns brighter and ethical questions pile up, the Tesla-Musk narrative grows more complicated. What started as a revolutionary car company is now entangled in partisan warfare, federal investigations, and allegations of self-enrichment at the highest levels. Whether Tesla can steer through this storm or becomes collateral damage in a much larger conflict remains to be seen.

Lead image White House / YouTube

Porsche has hopped on the conquest discount bandwagon, joining a growing list of automakers willing to sweeten the deal for those currently leasing a vehicle from another brand. Sure, if you’re eyeing an all-electric Porsche, the chances are that you can probably swing it without a discount, but hey, even the wealthiest among us appreciate a good deal when it’s on the table.

Read: After Polestar, Ford Tempts Tesla Owners With Conquest Discount For Mustang Mach-E

The German automaker is keeping things open-ended, offering a conquest discount to anyone, regardless of which brand or model car they’re leasing. The discount itself is no small change, ranging from $1,500 to $4,500, but there’s a catch—it’s tiered, meaning not everyone will walk away with the maximum savings.

The Details: Timing Is Everything

Here’s how it breaks down: if you’re in the final 30 days of your lease, tough luck, you’re not eligible for any discount. If your lease is set to expire within 31 to 60 days, you’re looking at a $1,500 discount. That jumps to $3,000 for leases ending in 61 to 90 days. But, to really cash in with the full $4,500, your lease has to be running a little longer, specifically, more than 91 days.

The Fine Print

There’s also a little fine print to keep in mind. According to Cars Direct, the discount maxes out at $1,500 if your new Porsche payment is less than $1,500 a month. Oh, and a trade-in is required unless your current lease has more than 181 days remaining.

This offer is available for the 2024 and 2025 Taycan and Macan EV models in the United States with Taycan prices starting at $99,400 and soaring over $230,000 for the high-end Taycan Turbo GT. The newly launched Macan Electric starts at $75,300, with the Macan Turbo Electric ringing in at $105,300 for the range-topping model.

So, while Porsche’s latest offer isn’t going to change the world, if you’ve got a lease nearing its end and are eyeing an electric Porsche, it might be worth checking if you qualify for a little extra savings.

With hefty US tariffs looming large across most of the automotive industry, many carmakers have to work out the best way to minimize the impacts. Some, like Honda, are reportedly planning to move some production from Mexico into the US. Others, like Hyundai, appear to be ahead of the game and aren’t overly concerned with Trump’s next moves.

Read: Hyundai’s New CEO Says Musk-Trump Friendship Is A “Positive” For All Carmakers

During the first Trump administration, the Hyundai Motor Group decided to make huge EV investments in the United States, and this decision could now start to pay dividends. While speaking during the company’s recent annual general meeting in South Korea, chief executive Jose Munoz confirmed the brand’s “localization strategy” will “help mitigate the impact of any potential policy change.”

Hyundai’s Bet Pays Off

This was the first time Munoz spoke at a Hyundai shareholder meeting since taking the top job at the firm on January 1, Bloomberg reports. His sentiment mimicked statements he made just days after starting as CEO, where he said the relationship between President Trump and Elon Musk “should be positive for the industry.”

Late last year, Hyundai started building the all-electric Ioniq 5 at its massive ‘Metaplant’ west of Savannah, Georgia, roughly two years after breaking ground at the site. This plant will handle the production of five other EVs from the Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis brands. Not only that but in May last year, Munoz revealed the plant would be adapted to also build hybrid vehicles.

A $12.6 Billion Gamble

Hyundai is investing roughly $12.6 billion into electric vehicle and battery manufacturing facilities across Georgia. While speaking about these investments earlier in the year, Munoz confirmed they were not made because of the Inflation Reduction Act under President Biden, nor because of any other incentives.

“It’s not a good policy to just simply make an investment because of the incentives, because they can come and go,” he said. “We believe the US market is the most important for us today and it’s going to continue to be the most important in terms of not only the absolute but also the growth and therefore, investing and localizing is a good strategy. I think we are in a better place today than we were four or five years ago.”

Attacks on Teslas have become a common occurrence and now the federal government is getting heavily involved. As part of this effort, U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi has announced charges against three people for the “violent destruction of Tesla properties” using Molotov cocktails.

While the Department of Justice didn’t release many specifics, one of the defendants was involved in an attack on a Tesla dealership in Salem, Oregon. The government says this person was armed with a suppressed AR-15 rifle and was arrested after throwing approximately eight Molotov cocktails.

More: Man Arrested After Alleged Molotov Cocktail Attack And Shooting At Tesla Store

The second individual was arrested in Loveland, Colorado after allegedly attempting to light Teslas on fire with Molotov cocktails. The government also claimed the “defendant was later found in possession of materials used to produce additional incendiary weapons”.

Lastly, a person in Charleston, South Carolina allegedly wrote “profane messages against President Trump” around Tesla charging stations. They then lit the chargers ablaze with Molotov cocktails.

Salem Police

Attorney General’s Statement

Attorney General Bondi was direct in her response to the situation, stating: “The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended. Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.” Her office added they’re “committed to ending all acts of violence and arson directed at Tesla properties and otherwise.”

The news comes two days after Bondi released another statement saying that “The swarm of violent attacks on Tesla property is nothing short of domestic terrorism. The Department of Justice has already charged several perpetrators with that in mind, including in cases that involve charges with five-year mandatory minimum sentences.”

As for the three people charged in this latest round, they now face prison sentences ranging from five to 20 years, depending on the specifics of their actions.

Extinguishing a fire in an electric vehicle is not your average firefighting job. It’s much trickier than putting out a blaze in a traditional combustion engine car, often requiring huge amounts of water—or, in some cases, submerging the whole car in a massive water tank.

Earlier this week, fire crews in Granite Falls, Washington, faced this exact challenge, but with a twist: they used a specially designed fire blanket to tackle the EV fire.

According to Snohomish Regional Fire & Rescue, an EV caught fire while driving on SR-92 early Monday morning. All vehicles used by local fire crews carry a special EV blanket for a situation like this. To quell the flames, the blanket is placed over the car while the battery pack is doused in water.

Read: Tesla Under Siege As Multiple EVs Set On Fire And Vandalized Across The US In One Day

EV fires generate tremendous amounts of heat and, unlike combustion-powered cars, can burn without oxygen. There have also been plenty of cases of EVs reigniting days or even weeks after the initial thermal event. To reduce the risk, local fire crews followed the flatbed transporting the EV to a local impound lot for storage.

The exact make and model of the EV involved in this incident has not been revealed. However, Granite Falls Fire made it clear on their Facebook page that the fire was not caused by an impact.

Are EV Fires Really That Common?

While EV fires often make headlines, the numbers tell a different story. According to data from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, there are about 25 fires for every 100,000 EVs sold in the U.S. That sounds concerning until you compare it to the 1,530 fires per 100,000 for gas-powered cars. So, despite the attention they grab, EV fires are still much rarer than those in traditional vehicles.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Snohomish Regional Fire & Rescue (@snoregionalfire)

Photo Snoregionalfire