❌

Reading view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.

Federal calls for SNAP data could deter eligible immigrants from applying, advocacy groups say

The Trump Administration is asking states to more closely watch the citizenship status of people receiving benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. But some advocates for immigrant families worry the messaging could hurt people who are eligible for the food assistance.

The post Federal calls for SNAP data could deter eligible immigrants from applying, advocacy groups say appeared first on WPR.

Trump bill would cost Wisconsin $314 million in federal food aid

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Wisconsin would lose about $314 million in food assistance from the federal government under the massive budget bill passed by the U.S. House last week, according to an analysis of the proposed cuts by the Wisconsin Department of Health Services.

The legislation, which President Donald Trump refers to as the β€œbig, beautiful bill,” would require states to start matching federal funds for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. It would also impose new work requirements on families with young children and older people, and it would require regular paperwork to prove exemptions from such requirements for some groups, such as families with special needs children.

Speaking to reporters Thursday, Wisconsin Medicaid Director Bill Hanna said those changes amount to new red tape that could cause 90,000 Wisconsinites to lose some or all assistance.

He said that would put new pressure on nonprofits like food pantries and have ripple effects at the retailers where people spend what’s commonly known as food stamps.

The proposal would push many costs onto the state, where lawmakers and the governor are in the process of deciding the next two-year budget.

β€œThere’s going to be more demand to put state money into a program that has been 100 percent federally funded for really its entire existence, which will strain the state’s ability to put its state dollars towards other things like education, our health care system and other important aspects of what we do with our state dollars,” Hanna said.

Those state costs are calculated based on a given state’s error rates, which tend to occur when a person’s income or residence changes unexpectedly. Hanna said that Wisconsin has a low error rate but is lumped into a bracket with states with much higher error rates, and charged accordingly.

β€œThese errors are not fraud,” DHS wrote in a statement. β€œFor the first time ever, Congress is proposing an extreme, zero tolerance policy for payment errors harming states like Wisconsin that consistently keep error rates low.”

States would also be responsible for covering new administrative costs and for providing job training to people newly obligated to fulfill work requirements.

All six of Wisconsin’s Republican congressmen voted for the bill. Both of Wisconsin’s Democratic House members voted against it.

Over the weekend, U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Prairie du Chien,Β arguedΒ that anyone β€œlegally receiving SNAP benefits should not see a single reduction in their SNAP.”

Hanna argued that’s because the federal government is β€œchanging the definition of β€˜legally receiving SNAP.’”

β€œThey are adding additional red tape to folks to meet that by expanding those work requirements,” he said. β€œThere certainly will be people who get caught up in the new red tape that they have to meet in order to achieve the benefits.”

Currently, about 700,000 Wisconsin residents β€” or an eighth of the state β€” receive SNAP.

This story was originally published by WPR.

Trump bill would cost Wisconsin $314 million in federal food aid is a post from Wisconsin Watch, a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

The Ultimate Guide to AI in Cleantech

The cleantech world is experiencing a quiet revolution. Artificial intelligence is no longer knocking at the door, it’s quietly remodeling the entire house....

The post The Ultimate Guide to AI in Cleantech appeared first on Cleantech Group.

China and the EU: Comparing Two Tech-Forward Plans for the Future of Food Production

China and the EU: Comparing Two Tech-Forward Plans for the Future of Food Production The EU and China have each released new strategic...

The post China and the EU: Comparing Two Tech-Forward Plans for the Future of Food Production appeared first on Cleantech Group.

Agtech Insights: The Importance of Strategics on Your Company’s Cap Table

Last November’s Thrive Global Impact Summit brought together several hundred entrepreneurs, investors, and senior executives in Silicon Valley for a day of debate...

The post Agtech Insights: The Importance of Strategics on Your Company’s Cap Table appeared first on Cleantech Group.

2025 Global Cleantech 100 Trend Watch

In the overview of our January 2020 Global Cleantech 100, we welcomed readers to the β€œRoaring 20s,” predicting a decade of cleantech growth,...

The post 2025 Global Cleantech 100 Trend Watch appeared first on Cleantech Group.

Cleantech Innovation in Latin America: Now Is the Time

Our first-ever LATAM Cleantech Β 25 was released last week, showcasing the emergence of a dynamic cleantech ecosystem across Latin America. Historically, this region...

The post Cleantech Innovation in Latin America: Now Is the Time appeared first on Cleantech Group.

Recent Deals – 17 December 2024

Robotic waste management, sustainable chocolate derived from precision fermentation, and a cloud-computing platform to curtail methane flares: Recent Deals worth looking atΒ  Agriculture...

The post Recent Deals – 17 December 2024 appeared first on Cleantech Group.

❌