The state of New York is one of the most pro-electric areas in the US, but its residents could soon find it much harder to buy America’s most popular EVs. A new bill proposes ending Tesla’s license to sell directly in the state, which could mean the brand losing access to its existing showrooms.

New York has for over 10 years outlawed direct selling, demanding all automakers sell through franchised dealers. But when that law passed in 2014 it contained an exemption for Tesla, giving it the right to continue operating five retail outlets it was already selling from. Now lawmakers want to pull those five permits and offer them to other EV companies, and not for anything Tesla has done, but due to the actions of its CEO, Elon Musk.

Related: New York Could End Tesla’s Direct Sales And Musk’s DOGE Drama Is To Blame

New York State Sen. Patricia Fahy (Dem) described Musk to the New York Times as “part of an administration that is killing all the grant funding for electric vehicle infrastructure, killing wind energy, killing anything that might address climate change.”

“Why should we give [Tesla] a monopoly?” Fahy, the co-sponsor of the bill, asked.

Musk helped bankroll President Trump’s successful bid to return to the White House, and in Fahy’s eyes set back efforts to combat climate change. And the Telsa boss’s controversial job-slashing efficiency drive and push to access IRS information with DOGE has hardly endeared himself to New York’s lawmakers.

In addition to rescinding Tesla’s showroom licenses, and opposing the establishment of a new one at Colonie, Democrats want the state to audit a deal that allowed the automaker to run a plant near Buffalo on a $1 per year lease and receive almost $1 billion in benefits. They want the subsidies returned and for those managing the state and city pension funds to get rid of any investments in Tesla.

If Tesla is forced from its retail stores, buyers would have to travel out of state to get their new cars, though the brand would still maintain a NY presence in the form of showrooms that allow people to see and sit in the company’s EVs but not actually place an order. The five stores that Tesla currently has could be offered to rival brands including Lucid, Rivian and Scout.

The latest episode in the ongoing feud between dealers and Scout Motors has escalated into a full-blown lawsuit. The California New Car Dealers Association (CNCDA) has filed suit against Volkswagen and Scout, accusing them of bypassing the law. Specifically, the CNCDA wants VW and Scout to sell their vehicles through dealerships instead of direct-to-consumer sales.

Forget about free-market dynamics, dealers are fighting for their slice of the pie, and they’re taking it to court to make sure they get it.

More: VW Talks US Pickup Again And It Could Be A Range-Extender EV

Brian Maas, CNCDA President, stated that “VW dealers would welcome the opportunity to sell Scout trucks and SUVs, but their manufacturer business partner is denying them that opportunity, in direct violation of California law.” The accusation here is that VW’s Scout Motors is allegedly breaking the law by allowing customers to buy vehicles directly from them, bypassing the traditional dealer model.

Is VW Picking and Choosing?

Maas didn’t stop there. He added, “Volkswagen can’t pick and choose which vehicles to sell on its own or through its franchised dealer network, reserving the most profitable or desirable vehicles for itself. Illegal competition will harm not only dealers but also the communities and car buyers that they serve.”

Of course, he fails to mention how wild markups, like the ones imposed by the very California dealers he represents, also hurt car buyers.

Scout and VW Fire Back

It didn’t take long for Scout and VW to respond, and unsurprisingly, both disagree with the CNCDA. After the dealer association sent a cease and desist letter to the automakers last year, Scout responded with a strongly worded letter. “VWGoA is not authorized by Scout Motors to sell, and will not be selling or distributing, Scout-branded EVs in California or in any other state. Scout Motors and the Scout brand exist and operate independently of VWGoA and its brands such as Volkswagen and Audi,” said Scout’s general counsel, Neil Sitron.

And if you thought Scout was backing down, think again. Sitron added, “Scout Motors will not do business with anyone that threatens or tries to intimidate it, either directly or indirectly…. should the CNCDA decide to act on its threats, Scout Motors will vigorously defend against them.”

Now, it looks like Scout will have to do exactly that – defend itself in a court of law. The CNCDA is accusing the automakers of unfair competition, false advertising, and is seeking civil penalties that could top $35 million.

It gets more interesting as Maas claimed that this suit “sends a message to every automaker.” That message could end up being “here’s how to sidestep dealers.” Tesla, Lucid, and Rivian have already proven that dealers aren’t necessary. If Scout and VW win this lawsuit, it’ll show legacy automakers a new path to direct sales, a model that consumers seem eager to engage with.

Buying a brand-new car is supposed to bring excitement, not the slow-burning dread of a major failure before the odometer even hits four digits. But for one unlucky Acura ZDX owner, that sense of new-car bliss barely lasted 400 miles (643 km). That’s when things went south.

A customer from Criswell Acura in Annapolis, Maryland, was informed their 2024 Acura ZDX needed an entirely new battery pack. Now the dealership itself is suing American Honda Motor Company in an effort to recover its losses from the ordeal.

More: New Lawsuit Might Force Ford To Change Mustang Mach-E Door Handles

According to the lawsuit, Criswell Acura purchased the ZDX wholesale for $69,207 in May 2024, then sold it to a customer shortly after. But just 400 miles into ownership, the new owner discovered that the electric SUV could no longer fully charge. Once the problem was reported, the dealership followed Acura’s recommendation and ordered a replacement battery pack. While the customer waited, the situation worsened. The ZDX eventually stopped charging altogether, and even the doors became inoperable.

One Fix Leads to Another

The dealership installed the new battery pack, but that wasn’t the end of the problems. After the install, a rear wheel sensor started playing up, and after being replaced, an error code still appeared. Acura’s tech line told the dealer to install a new harness from its inventory. Despite following these instructions, the error code remained, Auto News reports.

Criswell Acura claims that subsequent “requests for assistance from Honda have been virtually ignored. ” Nearly eight months later, the ZDX remains at the dealership, still undriveable. While the exact cause of the issues remains unknown, the dealer suspects the problems stem from the “result of bad design, manufacturer’s defect, installation, or pre-delivery damage.”

Under the terms of its dealer agreement, Honda is supposed to be responsible for any alleged manufacturing or design defects in Acura products. The lawsuit argues that this obligation hasn’t been met. The vehicle is “completely undriveable and unable to be repaired,” it states.

Criswell Acura is seeking damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The dealer has been forced to take a total loss on the SUV, claims it has lost profits from the sale to a customer, paid licensing and registration fees, and incurred considerable repair costs.

The case highlights the potential risks dealers face as EVs become more complex, especially when support from the manufacturer falls short.

A suspicious fire that tore through a Tesla dealership in Rome early Monday morning has left behind a scorched mess of metal and plenty of questions. At least 17 fully electric vehicles were destroyed in the blaze, marking the latest in a string of troubling incidents involving Tesla facilities around the globe.

The incident arrives amid growing backlash against Elon Musk, raising suspicions that this wasn’t just some random electrical mishap. While the exact cause remains under investigation, authorities have not ruled out arson. Fortunately, no one was injured, as the dealership was closed at the time of the fire. Still, the loss is significant, not just in property, but in what it might signal.

More: Man Tries To Torch Tesla Superchargers But Ends Up Torching Himself

According to local media, emergency services were alerted around 4 a.m. on Monday, March 31. Police have since questioned the dealership’s owners and are combing through CCTV footage, Reuters reports.

The fire broke out at the Tesla store located at 48 Via Serracapriola in Rome. Drone footage shared by the YouTube channel Local Team shows the parking lot littered with charred vehicle shells. At least 16 Teslas appear to have suffered irreparable damage.

These cars were reportedly prepped and ready for delivery to customers. Furthermore, the shed covering them was also damaged by the intense heat, though the Tesla dealership’s main building seems to have escaped the worst of it.

A Brand Under Fire—Literally

The timing is hard to ignore. Just two days before the fire, the so-called “Tesla Takedown” movement organized protests outside more than 200 Tesla dealerships across Europe and North America. Most gatherings remained peaceful, but a handful of them escalated into vandalism—and now, possibly worse.

Earlier this month, suspicious fires destroyed multiple Tesla EVs across the USA, as well as in Italy, Germany, and France. In Ontario, Canada, more than 80 vehicles were vandalized at a single Tesla dealership—another flashpoint in what’s quickly becoming a global anti-Musk movement. If there’s no connection between these incidents, it would be one hell of a coincidence.

#Vigilidelfuoco di #Savona in azione stanotte per l'#incendio di 17 automobili nel deposito vetture del porto cittadino. Utilizzata dalle squadre schiuma antincendio per abbattere le fiamme#30marzo pic.twitter.com/KJgVbvL8vw

— Vigili del Fuoco (@vigilidelfuoco) March 30, 2025

Lead image Google Maps

The $7,500 federal EV tax credit has given many Americans a financial nudge to go electric, but the program hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing. While the credit can now be applied directly at the point of sale, some dealerships have been dragging their feet on the process, leaving buyers high and dry without the discount they were promised. But, good news: there’s a fix in the works.

Read: Dealers’ Paperwork Errors Are Costing Buyers Their EV Tax Credits With The IRS

It turns out that while the rebate is available at purchase, dealers have to be enrolled in the program and use a portal to submit their EV sales report within three days of the transaction for the credit to go through. Miss that deadline, and the rebate? Poof. Gone.

The IRS Steps In with a Lifeline

Fortunately, the IRS is stepping up to the plate. According to the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), the agency is essentially hitting the reset button on the 3-day reporting rule. Now, dealers can submit reports for any qualifying clean vehicle credit transaction from 2024, even if it happened earlier in the year.

According to NADA, the IRS updated the portal earlier this week, making it fully operational for dealers. The good news here isn’t just for car buyers, it’s a win for dealerships, too. Some dealers had been offering the tax credit upfront to customers at the point of sale, only to later realize they hadn’t secured the actual rebate yet.

NADA says it “advocated aggressively for the IRS to remedy these issues” and even went so far as to send a formal letter to both the U.S. Department of Treasury and the IRS, urging them to address the problem quickly and implement a timely solution.

With the Trump administration set to impose 25% tariffs on all cars made overseas starting April 2, the tax credit is perhaps more valuable now than at any other time for consumers. These new tariffs are expected to drive up the cost of both new and used cars, possibly adding thousands to the price tag. So, for many buyers, that $7,500 credit is about to get a lot more valuable.

Some Tesla owners disgusted at CEO Elon Musk’s DOGE work for the US government, are selling their EVs, and some non-Tesla drivers are vandalizing the automaker’s EVs and property to show their displeasure. Now New York lawmakers are planning their own attack on Musk by attempting to remove Tesla’s right to sell directly to customers in the state.

Democrat senators are pushing to rescind permits granted in 2014 that allow Tesla to sell directly to consumers. Like several other US states, New York normally forbids direct sales, requiring automakers to sell through dealers. Even other EV makers such as Lucid and Rivian, which sell directly in other states, are not allowed to in New York.

Related: Trump Supporter Pulls Taser At Tesla Protesters, But Grandma Isn’t Having It

State Sen. Pat Fahy is leading the charge to rip up Tesla’s right to operate at five locations, but the five permits wouldn’t disappear altogether. Instead, they could be offered to rival brands, though some lawmakers and dealer groups believe the permits should be axed because they give too much power to a small number of people.

A similar bill designed to end Tesla’s direct-sales freedoms has been introduced in Washington state, and a bill proposing sales limits be raised for direct-to-consumer outlets has stalled, Politico reports. And none of this is rooted in hatred for Tesla itself, but for the man at the head of the company.

Since President Trump moved back into the White House, Musk has focused his energy on the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), whose federal cost-cutting drive has left thousands of people unemployed. He has also caused outrage by attempting to win DOGE employees access to sensitive tax information of millions of Americans.

And restricting Tesla’s sales isn’t the only way lawmakers could hit Musk in the pocket. Fahy – an EV advocate – and other senators have written to New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, asking him to sell off Tesla shares owned by the New York State pension fund.

Remember the good old days when radio head units were a one-size-fits-all affair, and dealers or aftermarket suppliers could quickly and easily upgrade your car’s stereo with a screwdriver and a bit of elbow grease? The gradual replacement of single and double-DIN head units for proprietary layouts, screens, and software was heralded as progress. But when car manufacturers decide they no longer want to include a feature, it leaves frustrated owners without an option.

That’s what happened when General Motors decided to drop Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for its Ultium EV platform. Naturally, customers were a little miffed, but one dealer came to the rescue, offering to install an aftermarket solution that allows screen mirroring.

Read: Why GM’s Software Boss Thinks Ultifi Can Beat Apple CarPlay

But now GM has stopped it, according to The Drive. The dealer claims GM instructed them to stop offering the kit. Additionally, the manufacturer of the kit pulled the product from its website, claiming it was no longer viable to keep selling it.

Mirroring Dreams

Back in 2023, General Motors made the controversial decision to drop Android Auto and Apple CarPlay support from its new-generation EVs. Instead, it would offer its own smartphone-compatible software solution: Ultifi.

At the time, GM defended the move, saying that it helped the company offer a more “deeply integrated experience that you can create with the vehicle” by building a system from the ground up. The future of autonomy, as well as other features such as battery preconditioning, were all listed as reasons why GM’s own tech was the way forward.

As is often the case, the aftermarket seemingly came to the rescue when White Automotive and Media Services (WAMS) developed a kit that allowed OEM-like integration of the two most popular screen mirroring apps.

The only catch was that the WAMS kit wasn’t something a hobbyist or casual user could install. Instead, it required a specialist touch. A single dealership, LaFontaine Chevrolet in Plymouth, Michigan, was tapped to offer the professional install.

The Unsurprising Block

As you can easily guess, GM wasn’t very pleased with the situation. The company launched an investigation into the kit, and a company spokesperson said: “Aftermarket services that introduce features not originally designed, thoroughly tested, and approved by GM may cause unintended issues for customers. These issues could affect critical safety features and may also void portions of the vehicle’s warranty.”

It all sounds like this was a specialist piece of kit that, at best, modified and, at worst, wholly bypassed GM’s proprietary software. And with the amount of data that cars can collect nowadays, there’s also a question mark over just how protected one’s personal info is after the installation of a third-party device. As we’ve reported many times, though, that’s also a big issue for automakers themselves and how they use owners’ data, so it’s kinda the kettle calling the pot black.

Are We At The Mercy Of Automakers?

With the WAMS system only offered by one dealership and the complexity of the kit precluding DIY installers, it can be assumed that with the only distribution channel shut down, WAMS couldn’t see a future in the product.

However, it’s another stark reminder that as cars become more tech-laden, we’re increasingly at the behest of the manufacturers who can decide to end support for key selling points at any time. Not to mention putting already installed features behind a paywall despite the hardware already being there. Sure, they might call them subscriptions, but milking their customers trying to cash in for a software update by any other name still smells fishy.

Tesla was accused by the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association (CADA) of cheating legitimate car dealers and buyers in Canada out of iZEV subsidies earlier this month. Critics have now grown even more suspicious after footage emerged of hundreds of new Tesla EVs left in disused parking lots.

Canadian media discovered huge fleets of brand new Model 3s and Model Ys languishing in the lot of an old strip mall in Toronto, conveniently located across the street from a Tesla dealership. Hundreds of miles away in Laval, Quebec, reporters founds scores more Teslas jammed into parking bays in another lot.

Related: Tesla Accused Of Gaming Canada’s EV Rebate Program After 4 Stores Sold 2 Cars Per Minute Wiping Out $43M In Grants

A staggering 8,600 cars were registered in just three days at four Tesla retail outlets in Canada, which breaks down as one car every minute, 24 hours a day for three straight days, even when the stores were closed. That kind of activity is highly unusual, but what really raised eyebrows was the timing of the sales flurry.

The sales came during a period when demand for Teslas in Canada had tanked, in part due to CEO Elon Musk’s association with President Trump, who has threatened to impose significant import tariffs and repeatedly suggested that Canada could become the USA’s 51st state. But the sales also occurred right before the country paused its iZEV electric vehicle subsidy program, leading some to suggests Tesla had gamed the system.

Tesla filed for C$43.1 million (US$30M) in rebates, which represented more than half of the remaining C$71.8 million (US$50M) allocated for EV rebates, and has left many Canadian car dealers out of pocket. They had fronted the discount themselves for each car they’d sold on the understanding that they’d be able to recoup the money from the Canadian government, but that might not now happen.

One dealer CTV News spoke to said he was C$400k ($279k) down because Tesla’s sales rush meant he hadn’t had chance to claim before the program was shut down.

More: Over 80 Tesla Cars Vandalized At Canadian Dealership In Possibly The Largest Attack Yet

Tesla better hope the vandals behind recent attacks on its cars and showrooms don’t watch the news, because hundreds of Model 3s and Model Ys parked up together sounds like a dream come true for protestors. We’ve asked Tesla—who famously disbanded its press team in the US—about the lots full of cars, but so far, we haven’t received a response.

Lead image Google Maps