FRISCO, Texas — Despite uncertainty surrounding federal restructuring and funding, former federal special education official Glenna Wright-Gallo reminded TSD Conference that the responsibility of transporting students with disabilities remains the same: “We do what’s right for kids.”
Wright-Gallo, the current vice president of policy for Everway and former assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS), gave the opening keynote Monday, “When the Floor Moves: Navigating Federal Restructuring, Flexible Funding and Legal Obligations in Transporting Students with Disabilities.” With it, she examined how federal restructuring, staffing shortages and rising transportation costs are creating new challenges for school districts. However, she stressed that evolving administrative systems do not eliminate districts’ responsibilities to students.
“What hasn’t changed, though, is the entitlement that students have to services, whether it’s (Free and Appropriate Public Education or FAPE) and an [individualized education program or IEP], whether it has to do with their homelessness and their school of origin rights and services at no cost to the family,” said Wright-Gallo, who also previously served as state director of special education in Utah and the associate superintendent of special education in Washington state.
Breaking Down Departmental Silos
Wright-Gallo opened her presentation with a revealing question: How many transportation professionals had recently spoken with their district’s Title I coordinator about transportation? Only about three or four attendees raised their hands.
When she asked about communication with special education directors, approximately half the room responded. The informal hand-raising survey highlighted a disconnect that Wright-Gallo said school district transportation departments can no longer afford to overlook.
School districts traditionally operate within departmental silos, with transportation, special education, federal programs and finance departments managing separate budgets and responsibilities. Yet the needs of students frequently intersect across multiple programs.
For example, a student with an IEP may also qualify for Title I services or protections under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. Addressing those needs independently can result in missed funding opportunities and duplicated services.
Wright-Gallo encouraged transportation directors to identify additional partners when operational challenges arise instead of relying exclusively on existing resources.
Staffing Shortages and Rising Costs
The need for collaboration becomes increasingly urgent as transportation departments navigate staffing shortages and growing operating expenses. Citing a recent HopSkipDrive survey, Wright-Gallo shared that 71 percent of school districts experienced operational consequences from driver shortages. Additionally, 46 percent reported longer ride times, 30 percent canceled or consolidated routes and 23 percent lost transportation for extracurricular activities, field trips or athletics.
These challenges raise concerns about how districts prioritize services, particularly when students with disabilities depend on specialized transportation to access their education. During an audience discussion, attendees shared strategies for minimizing disruptions. One participant explained that their district would implement multiple runs on general education routes before reducing transportation for students with disabilities. Another described using CDL-qualified office personnel, dispatchers and trainers to fill staffing gaps.
However, another attendee noted that unexpected shortages sometimes make it more practical to delay a special education route rather than leave other students waiting at bus stops without supervision.
Financial pressures further complicate those decisions.
Referencing a statement made by consultant Tim Ammon during a funding cliff session at STN EXPO East in March, Wright-Gallo emphasized that flat funding coupled with increasing expenses effectively represents a budget cut. With fuel, insurance, wages and replacement parts continuing to become more expensive, she encouraged districts to examine efficiencies, alternative service models and additional funding streams.
Federal Restructuring Creates New Questions
Beyond everyday operational challenges, Wright-Gallo addressed federal restructuring efforts that have shifted certain education-related administrative responsibilities across agencies.
She discussed interagency agreements involving the U.S. Departments of Education, Labor, Health and Human Services, and Justice, and the potential implications for funding administration, technical assistance and oversight.
While changes to administrative responsibilities may affect how school districts communicate with federal agencies or access reimbursements, Wright-Gallo emphasized that interagency agreements cannot independently rewrite statutory requirements.
She cautioned districts against making premature operational changes based solely on federal announcements, news coverage or speculation.
“Remember, anytime there’s an announcement or in the news, it’s not an instruction,” she said.
Instead, transportation administrators should review actual grant agreements, applicable legal requirements and official funding instructions before changing established services.
Wright-Gallo also raised concerns about potential reimbursement delays and administrative adjustments, including what she described as the “defend the spend” process associated with Health and Human Services. That process emphasizes providing documentation to substantiate reimbursement requests and demonstrate compliance.
With federal budget uncertainty continuing, she urged transportation officials to work proactively with finance departments and district leadership on contingency planning and family communication.
Her recommendations included maintaining updated agency contacts, following award instructions, preserving documentation, preparing for funding delays, distinguishing confirmed requirements from potential risks, and establishing regular reviews of funding and compliance procedures.
Finding Funding Beyond the Transportation Budget
One of Wright-Gallo’s recommendations was for transportation departments to look beyond traditional transportation funding sources.
She identified several programs that could potentially support eligible transportation activities, including Medicaid, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B funding, Title II-A, Title IV-A, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs, vocational rehabilitation and the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA).
For example, Wright-Gallo explained that certain Title-funded professional development opportunities could potentially include transportation personnel when training supports the program’s educational objectives.
Trauma-informed practices, child sexual abuse prevention training, assistive technology and student safety were among the areas she encouraged districts to explore with their Title coordinators. She said this ensures transportation staff are included when shared student needs warrant their participation.
Travel training, which TSD Conference covered with a breakout session Monday, can help students develop the skills necessary to navigate transportation systems beyond graduation.
Wright-Gallo noted that vocational rehabilitation programs have federal spending requirements for certain services to transition-age students, presenting opportunities for partnerships that districts may be overlooking. She encouraged transportation directors to connect with career and technical education administrators and vocational rehabilitation agencies to identify opportunities for coordinated services.
On the fleet side, she discussed uncertainty surrounding EPA’s Clean School Bus Program and identified an anticipated $180 million DERA grant opportunity for diesel vehicle replacements and retrofits. She advised districts to monitor official announcements rather than build budgets around funding that has not yet been awarded.
Kendra Larsen, transportation router for Widefield School District 3 in Colorado, said the opportunities for funding that transportation is missing was a standout of Wright-Gallo’s presentation.
“The people we need to connect with, and say, ‘Hey, have you looked at this opportunity, can we get together and collaborate,’” Larsen said of additional takeaways. “Just the idea of building your community farther out than your transportation department.”
Connecting the IEP to the School Bus
Wright-Gallo also challenged transportation professionals to reconsider how student needs are documented and translated into daily operations. She pointed to IEPs that identify a student’s requirement for “special transportation” without detailing how transportation staff should provide the necessary support.
“Checking the box doesn’t change outcomes,” she said.
Instead, she encouraged transportation directors to work with special education teams to improve how transportation accommodations are determined and documented.
Those discussions should address whether specialized transportation is necessary, how behavioral intervention plans apply on the bus, what communication supports students require and whether assistive technology should accompany them during transportation.
Related: Meeting Special Needs Transportation Challenges Beyond the Yellow Bus
Related: TSD Keynote Highlights Legal Lessons for Special Needs Transportation
Related: Mulick Promotes Independence by Reducing Reliance on 1:1 Adult Support
Related: Shared Services Offer Opportunities to Improve Efficiency, Accountability in Special Needs Transportation
A student who relies on an augmentative and alternative communication device in the classroom, for example, may also need that technology during the ride to and from school. Wright-Gallo emphasized that IEP teams should determine those needs and ensure transportation personnel understand how to safely support students using the equipment.
The same coordination should extend to student behavior, positive behavioral interventions and supports, and staff training.
Rather than conducting separate professional development for transportation employees and educators, Wright-Gallo encouraged districts to identify shared training opportunities that improve consistency between the classroom and the school bus.
Demonstrating Transportation’s Educational Impact
Ultimately, Wright-Gallo said transportation leaders must move beyond simply documenting compliance and begin demonstrating how their services contribute to student outcomes.
She referenced a 2024 Michigan study of economically disadvantaged elementary and middle school students that associated access to reliable transportation with a 3.8-percentage-point reduction in chronic absenteeism. The study did not establish a corresponding improvement in academic test scores, underscoring the need for additional research connecting transportation services with longer-term educational outcomes.
That distinction, she explained, is important when communicating funding needs to district leadership and policymakers. Rather than solely requesting additional resources, transportation departments should demonstrate how funding would improve service delivery, student attendance, independence or access to educational opportunities.
Olivia Malone, director of transportation for Olathe Public Schools in Kansas, said she appreciated the presentation and especially the options for additional funding and connectivity.
“I’m excited to go back and talk to individuals about how they are accessing these funds and how they are being utilized throughout our programs,” she said.
As the keynote concluded, Wright-Gallo asked attendees to identify one person they needed to connect with upon returning to their districts, whether a special education director, Title I coordinator, CTE administrator, superintendent or another potential partner.
“Our funding and our partners might have changed slightly, but the real work that we do every day, that you do every day and that you lead every day, has not changed,” Wright-Gallo concluded. “Ultimately, this comes back to we do what’s right for kids, right?”
The post Students with Disabilities Must Remain at Center of Decision-Making, Advises Expert appeared first on School Transportation News.