Jaguar Land Rover has instructed almost three dozen I-Pace owners in the US to avoid parking their EVs near structures and to limit charging to 80% because incorrectly repaired examples are at risk of catching fire.

This recall follows on from an earlier one impacting 2019 Jaguar I-Pace models. The brand says 34 vehicles in the US have not had software updates correctly installed and have a safety defect that can cause the EVs to catch fire. Impacted models were assembled between February 18, 2018, and March 11, 2019.

Read: Jaguar Is Buying Back 2,760 Faulty I-Pace EVs Over Fire Risk

Jaguar started to audit its previous recall on November 12 and found three vehicles that had not been correctly updated, even though retailers had submitted a claim for the repair to the carmaker. Jaguar has since reviewed the logs across its retail network and found that 34 vehicles continue to represent a safety risk and must be fixed. While there have not been any reports of accidents, injuries, or fires, it’s a fault that owners should take seriously. The recall also comes just a few weeks after Jaguar said it was buying back 2,760 I-Paces in the US that can catch fire.

Dealers will be notified of this latest recall on January 2, while owners will be informed by February 7. Retailers have been instructed to install an interim software update to fix the fault.

Interestingly, JLR first issued this new recall with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on December 12 and did not tell owners to park their EVs away from structures. However, the recall notice was updated on December 17, warning owners of the dangers.

“In line with recommendations made by manufacturers who have had similar issues and until such time as the safety recall remedy has been completed, retailers and customers should park away from structures,” the recall states. “Where possible, vehicles should be charged outside. Customers should also limit their charge to a maximum of 80% until the recall remedy has been completed. The Owner Manual should be consulted to confirm how to monitor vehicle charge level.”

Henrik Fisker’s attempts to establish his own car companies have ended in complete failure. Twice, he has launched his own car company, and twice, those ventures have ended in collapse. Earlier this year, Fisker filed for bankruptcy while attempting to deliver the all-electric Ocean SUV. The fallout has left owners stuck with vehicles that have not only depreciated significantly but are also riddled with a host of frustrating issues.

The most recent—and perhaps most troubling—issue concerned the risk of unexpected rollaway. In early February, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) began investigating unintended vehicle movement in 2023 model-year Fisker Oceans.

Read: Fisker’s Bankruptcy Plan Approved, Owners Won’t Have To Pay For Recall Repairs

The ODI discovered that impacted vehicles contain a logic that prevents the engagement of the park gear when the park gear request is made while the vehicle is moving at low speeds. Put more simply, if a driver tries to turn on the parking brake while the EV is moving, it’ll reject the request and shift into neutral. According to the safety agency, there’s a risk that drivers may not realize the parking brake hasn’t been switched on, and there’s a chance the Ocean could roll away if just left in neutral.

News of the investigation first emerged late last month. On November 15, Fisker issued a recall covering 7,745 Oceans from the 2023 and 2024 model years to address the problem. Following the issuance of this recall, the ODI has been able to close its investigation.

As part of the software update, the Fisker Ocean will automatically slow to a stop if the driver unlatches their seatbelt while traveling at low speeds. Once stopped, the SUV will automatically switch into park gear and enable the parking brake. Fisker has also introduced an Auto Vehicle Hold function, which will hold the SUV in place even after the driver removes their foot from the brake pedal. This is a standard feature on most cars, and, oddly, the Ocean didn’t have it until the introduction of OS 2.0.

Fisker has been forced to launch several other recalls for the Ocean this year, including due to a sudden loss of drive power, an unprompted reduction in regenerative braking, malfunctioning warning lights, and outer door handles that can stick and fail to open.

Two months after Porsche issued a widespread recall of 2020-2024 Taycan models across the United States for a battery defect, a class action lawsuit has been filed against the automaker and is seeking a jury trial in relation to the battery fault.

The lawsuit, filed by Gibbs Law Group, names plaintiff Miodrag Kukrika and alleges Porsche has failed to disclose or adequately repair a “dangerous and widespread” defect in the EV’s battery pack. The law group are seeking to represent a class of owners and lessees of impacted Taycan models and claims Porsche has known about the issue since at least February 2020 after a vehicle fire at a home in Florida.

Read: Porsche Taycan Recall Means You’re Stuck Charging To 80% Until 2025

“Porsche investigated the incident and since then, has learned about several other fires and about numerous owner complaints about the Battery Defect,” the class action states. 

In the recall notice issued in early October, Porsche said the high-voltage batteries of certain Taycans could short circuit, leading to fires. Owners have been asked to cap charging of their vehicles to 80% until early 2025, when an on-board diagnostic system will be installed to detect battery module anomalies. Vehicles shown to have battery faults will have their packs replaced.

This class action lawsuit says the automaker hasn’t addressed the “root cause of the defect” and should repair or replace all of the defective batteries. Kukrika alleges Porsche is guilty of fraudulent concealment and omission, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, and negligent misrepresentation/omission. He is seeking a jury trial and has requested injunctive relief alongside an award of punitive, compensatory, treble, and exemplary damages for all class members.

“The Battery Defect presents an unreasonable safety risk to drivers and passengers of the Class Vehicles and to people in residential homes and other structures where the vehicles are parked or near,” the lawsuit adds.

The class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on November 29.

Headlights are one of the most crucial safety features on any vehicle, but when they’re too bright, they can pose just as much risk as being too dim. Newly delivered 2024 and 2025 Porsche Macan Electric models in the US now require repairs because their overly bright headlights exceed safety standards, potentially increasing the risk of a crash.

Modern headlights have come a long way, offering better performance than their predecessors, but sometimes progress overshoots the mark. Porsche discovered that the high beams on affected Macan Electric models were programmed to European Economic Commission (ECE) standards rather than the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) required in the US.

As a result, when the high beams are activated, they exceed the maximum brightness levels allowed stateside—a classic case of technology failing to dim its enthusiasm.

Read: Porsche To Sell ICE Macan In The US “For The Foreseeable Future”

A total of 2,941 Macan Electric SUVs, built between March 15 and November 4, 2024, are part of this recall. Porsche is concerned that the overly bright beams could dazzle oncoming drivers, reducing visibility and increasing crash risks. While the irony of “too much light” causing trouble isn’t lost on us, this is a safety oversight that Porsche aims to fix promptly.

To remedy the issue, Porsche will reprogram the headlight control unit software on all affected vehicles at no cost to owners. Letters will be sent out to notify customers, with the process beginning no later than January 24, 2025.

All Macan Electric models sold in the US come standard with a 100 kWh battery pack and an 800-volt electric architecture. The entry-level all-wheel drive Macan 4 delivers 402 hp and 479 lb-ft (648 Nm) while the Macan Turbo ups the ante with 630 hp and 833 lb-ft (1,128 Nm) of torque, allowing it to hit 60 mph (96 km/h) in 3.1 seconds. This makes it even quicker than a Porsche 911 GT3 off the line. In June, a rear-wheel drive version with 335 hp was added to the Macan Electric family, as was a new 4S with 509 hp.

Interestingly, Porsche also plans to continue selling the Macan in ICE form in the US for the foreseeable future. Porsche had always planned to sell the outgoing ICE version alongside the Macan Electric for at least a couple of years but if demand for the older model is strong enough, it could keep on kicking for longer.

Tesla is recalling approximately two dozen Model Ys built in late October after discovering a seat issue that could increase the risk of injury in a crash, just the latest in a string of quality control hiccups for the EV maker.

Since its debut, the Tesla Model Y has been the top-selling electric vehicle globally, and one might expect that by now, Tesla would have perfected the car’s finer details. However, a small issue has cropped up with Model Ys built between October 28 and October 30, 2024. The problem centers around the seats, specifically the welds attaching the recliner mechanism to the seat back. If the welds are insufficient, it could compromise the seat’s integrity, potentially failing to properly restrain the occupant in the event of a crash.

Read: This Is Everything We Know About The 2025 Tesla Model Y Juniper

Owners of affected Model Ys will likely notice if something’s amiss. Loose or rattling seats, resistance when reclining, or an inability to fully recline could all signal the problem. In total, 27 Model Ys are involved in this recall.

Tesla’s engineers first began investigating a seat recliner failure on October 29 when the factory’s welding equipment generated multiple non-conformances. The carmaker spent the following week investigating the fault and later completed a weld analysis to characterize the condition and identify vehicles that may be impacted. Tesla has not received any warranty claims related to the potentially dodgy seats.

Recall Notifications Begin in January

All Tesla stores and service centers were informed about the recall on November 26, 2024, while owners will be alerted starting January 21, 2025. Owners of impacted models will need to bring their Model Ys to a service center where the seat assembly will be replaced with a certified one, free of charge.

Word of this recall comes just a couple of weeks after Tesla launched the sixth recall involving the all-electric Cybertruck. In that case, vehicles need to be repaired because of a fault that may develop within the drive inverter.

Jaguar is going to extreme lengths to deal with a fire risk problem on its recently-axed I-Pace EV. The British automaker has agreed to buy back 2,760 2019MY examples sold in the US to get the situation resolved, at least in its customers’ eyes.

The problem relates to concerns about batteries overheating and potentially catching fire, something that has been an issue with the I-Pace for several years now. Previous recalls have applied software-based fixes but data revealed that some 2019 cars that have received the remedy are still suffering thermal overloads. To date, three of the 2019MY EVs have caught fire despite receiving a software update.

Related: Jaguar I-Pace Owners Told To Park Outside After 3 Fires Involving Previously Recalled EVs

In August Jag told owners to park outside and away from buildings and announced that another code update would limit the car’s to an 80 percent charge as a temporary fix. A “permanent remedy is under development,” the company said at the time, and this month we learned that the permanent remedy means Jaguar dipping into its pockets to buy back almost 3,000 cars.

The good news for Jag is that the I-Pace has suffered from horrific depreciation, so the bill, while still huge, isn’t going to be as big as it could have been. And we imagine a large proportion of the affected owners will be glad to see the back of their trouble-prone cars, even if they are great to drive and they end up with less to spend on a new car than they were hoping.

Ordinarily, a story about a carmaker having to buy back thousands of six-year-old EVs due to a safety issue would be a PR disaster for the automaker involved. But after having been subjected to a week of ridicule over its attempts to rebrand, Jag execs are probably delighted that an I-Pace recall has nobly offered to deflect some of the attention.

Jaguar is relaunching itself as an electric-only Porsche and Bentley rival and will show a concept version of the first of three new models on December 2. To underline the shift, Jag has killed off its entire current model line and come up with new logos and branding that were met with derision and confusion online.

Fisker may have gone bankrupt, but its products are still out there, keeping their owners on their toes. The latest twist? Yet another recall for the all-electric Ocean SUV, this time targeting 7,745 vehicles. While Ocean owners might be experiencing a strong sense of déjà vu, this isn’t just another footnote, it’s a serious safety concern that can’t be ignored.

While the recall was only recently published by the NHTSA, Fisker has known about the issue for quite some time and first introduced an over-the-air software update to rectify it back in March. However, it’s clear that not every owner may have been aware of this fix. If you’re one of them, consider this your gentle nudge: check your vehicle for the latest update.

Read: Fisker Wants Owners To Pay Recall Labor, DOJ Says No Way

At the core of the recall is a fault in the transmission that may prevent the vehicle from shifting into the selected gear. As a result, the SUV could to roll away while in Drive or Reverse. According to the NHTSA’s National Center of Statistics and Analysis, vehicle rollaways lead to an average of 144 deaths and approximately 1,900 injuries annually in the United States. For something as seemingly minor as a software glitch, the implications are anything but trivial.

A Troubled Year for Fisker

This latest recall is just the tip of the iceberg for Fisker, which spent much of 2024 firefighting one issue after another. The company, already grappling with financial woes that culminated in bankruptcy, has issued no fewer than five recalls for the Ocean this year alone. Among them are defects involving a sudden loss of drive power, malfunctioning warning lights, and an unprompted reduction in regenerative braking—none of which inspire confidence for current or prospective owners.

Other recalls have focused on more mechanical problems, such as outer door handles that stick and fail to open, and a water pump prone to failure, potentially causing a total loss of drive power. If the Ocean was meant to make waves, these issues are definitely not the kind Fisker had in mind.

Earlier this year, Fisker added insult to injury when it announced that owners would have to cover labor costs for certain recalls, including the door handle and water pump fixes. Unsurprisingly, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) intervened, pointing out that this move would be illegal. As part of its bankruptcy restructuring plan, Fisker has since committed to covering all recall-related costs—a small but critical concession to owners already feeling the brunt of these missteps.

The Hyundai Motor Group is recalling 208,107 electric vehicles in the United States as they can suffer a loss of drive power. The problem centers on the integrated charging control unit, which can be damaged and prevent the 12-volt battery from charging.

The recall is broken up into two parts and one includes 62,872 Kia EV6s from the 2022-2024 model years. The second part is larger as it involves 145,235 vehicles including the 2022-2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5, 2023-2025 Hyundai Ioniq 6, 2023-2024 Genesis G80 Electrified, 2023-2025 Genesis GV70 Electrified, and 2023-2025 Genesis GV60.

More: Hyundai, Kia, Genesis Recall Nearly Every Single e-GMP EV In America

According to the government, the integrated charging control unit may be damaged from transient high voltage and thermal cycling over time. This can eventually prevent the 12-volt battery from charging, leading it to gradually drain. If this occurs, drivers will be warned something is amiss and may experience “progressive reductions of motive power.” If they continue, the vehicle may eventually lose all drive power.

The EV6s were involved in a recall earlier this year, but a supposedly ‘fixed’ vehicle experienced a loss of drive power in May. This sparked an investigation and Kia eventually found “88 unique cases that allege loss of motive power” following the initial recall. Thankfully, no crashes, injuries, fatalities or fires were reported.

On the Hyundai and Genesis side, there were 57 reports between March 25 and November 5 of this year. None resulted in any injuries or crashes.

Owner notifications are slated to be sent out in the coming weeks and the remedy will see dealers inspect and replace the integrated charging control unit, as well as its fuse, as necessary. In addition, dealers will install updated software that “optimizes thermal management and peak voltage during operation.” Unfortunately for technicians, this is a huge pain as the fix for the EV6 is 26 steps long and involves removing underbody paneling as well as taking out the rear seat.

A next-generation Chevrolet Bolt is on the horizon, but GM can’t seem to escape the shadow of its troubled past with the model. The automaker has just issued yet another recall for the older Bolt, a reminder that the headaches of its earlier EV experiment are far from over.

You’ll no doubt remember that three years ago, GM recalled more than 140,000 Bolts across the United States because there was a risk they could catch fire. The issue was traced back to a problem with the battery pack, which was sourced from LG. Now, GM has revealed that some of the 2020-2022 Bolt EV and Bolt EUV models repaired under the previous recall are still at risk of catching fire.

Read: Chevy Bolt Owners Could Be Compensated Up To $1,400 For Battery Fires

As part of a prior recall, GM dealers were instructed to install advanced diagnostic software that alerts drivers to faults within the battery. However, it’s been revealed that in some Bolts, this software was not properly installed, and the vehicle may fail to identify defective battery modules that require replacement. GM says this increases the risk of a vehicle fire.

This is bad news for GM, which has already been severely embarrassed by previous Bolt issues. Fortunately, this latest fault is not widespread and impacts just 107 vehicles in the US. These consist of 2020-2022 Bolt EV models manufactured from November 8, 2019, to May 19, 2021, and 2022 Bolt EUV models built between March 30, 2021, and July 23, 2021.

The carmaker became aware of the issue on July 23, 2024, after a brand quality manager discovered an incorrect software update had limited a customer’s Bolt EUV to 80% state of charge, despite exceeding the prescribed ~6,200 mile (~10,000 km) evaluation period.

GM will notify owners by December 16, 2024, and instruct them to take their EVs to a dealer where the diagnostic software will be installed correctly. In the interim, GM is asking owners to set a 90% charge limitation on their vehicles, encouraging them to charge more frequently and to avoid draining the battery to below 70 miles (113 km) of remaining range. Additionally, owners should park their vehicles outside immediately after charging and should not leave them charging indoors overnight.

Ford has issued two new recalls in the United States, impacting the 2021 Mustang Mach-E and the 2024 Maverick. Fortunately for the car manufacturer, one of the recalls only impacts 50 vehicles, while the other is limited to just 6 units.

The largest of the two recalls impacts the Mustang Mach-E. Ford has revealed an over-the-air update rolled out to the anti-lock braking system calibration file can cause the ABS to switch to its default configuration. If this happens, the brake system will not provide brake power assist, meaning customers may notice longer pedal travel, higher pedal efforts, and experience reduced braking response.

Read: Ford Bronco And Ranger Recalled Over Loose And Missing Nuts

This isn’t the only thing owners of certain Mustang Mach-E models have to worry about. In addition to causing the brake power assist system to stop functioning, the over-the-air update also disables the ABS, electronic stability control, traction control, hill start assist, and pre-collision assist systems. It also reduces the capabilities of the regenerative braking system.

Owners of impacted models may notice several ABS-related warning lights and text on the instrument cluster at start-up. All 50 Mustang-Mach E models being recalled were built between August 28, 2020, and September 24, 2021.

Dealers will rectify the issue by updating the ABS calibration. Owners will be alerted of the recall from November 4.

The second recall involves six examples of the 2024 Ford Maverick. In this case, the second-row child seat tether anchors have been installed with below-average thread-forming torque. If the thread does not completely engage, vehicles may not meet the strength requirements for child restraint anchorage systems and fall foul of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Ford has blamed the issue on unauthorized rework at a supplier facility in Mexico.

All impacted Mavericks were built on August 28, 2024. Ford will inform owners of the fault by December 2 and instruct them to take vehicles to a Ford or Lincoln dealership, where the tether anchorage points will be repaired free of charge.

Hundreds of 2025 Chevrolet Blazer, Blazer EV, and Equinox EV models a part of a recall across the U.S. over a critical safety issue: doors that could unexpectedly open while driving or during a crash. Safe to say, having your doors swing open mid-commute isn’t exactly a feature anyone’s asking for. The good news? GM reports that none of these vehicles have left dealership lots yet.

GM has confirmed that the vehicles in question were fitted with door strikers sourced from Brano Group A.S., which were not properly heat-treated to meet the carmaker’s hardness specifications. The result? These strikers could crack under pressure, allowing the doors to swing open when you least expect it, significantly raising the risk of injury to anyone inside.

Read: 2024 Chevy Blazer EV And Other GM SUVs Recalled Over Unexpected Door Openings

A total of 731 vehicles in the U.S. are affected by the recall. That breaks down to 513 Blazers built between August 30, 2024, and September 6, 2024, 215 Blazer EV models from the same production window, and 3 Equinox EVs manufactured between September 4, 2024, and September 5, 2024. If you’ve got one of these on order, you might want to double-check that delivery date.

Chevrolet was first alerted to a potential issue on September 6, 2024, when a quality engineer at GM’s Ramos Arizpe plant in Mexico saw a door striker fracture during routine side door adjustment.

This isn’t GM’s first rodeo with faulty door strikers on these models. Back in late December 2023, the Blazer, Blazer EV, and Equinox EV were also recalled over the same issue. At the time, GM thought that it had purged all of the faulty door strikers from their supply. However, it turns out not all of the suspect stock was removed from a warehouse used by the Mexican plant, leading to the installation of several hundred faulty strikers in new vehicles.

Fortunately, GM is not aware of any field incidents related to the defect. None of the 731 affected vehicles in the U.S.—nor the additional 124 units in Canada and Mexico—have been delivered to customers yet. Dealers have been instructed to replace all four side door strikers and attaching bolts with new properly treated parts before these vehicles ever reach showrooms.

Porsche only just rolled out the refreshed 2025 Taycan, and guess what? It’s already facing its first recall in the United States. The culprit? A glitch in the rear-view camera system. And while recalls are rarely welcome news for owners, this one is relatively minor, impacting fewer than 200 cars across the country.

According to the automaker, if the new Taycan detects an object in front of it, the visual park assist function will be automatically enabled. However, if this system is triggered and the reverse gear is engaged shortly after, the rear-view camera may not activate within the time required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, boosting the risk of a fender bender.

Read: US Porsche Taycans Were Sold With EU Headlight Software

A total of 183 Taycans, all built between March 27, 2024, and August 19, 2024, are affected by this snafu. According to Porsche, a software programming bug is the root of the problem. Yep, it’s always the software, isn’t it?

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) filed the recall notice after the issue popped up during a function endurance test in August. So, they’re on it, and now Porsche has to play clean-up.

Porsche will notify owners of 2025 Taycans about the recall via mail by November 29, instructing them to take their vehicle to a dealer where the central computer will be programmed with an updated data set that ensures the rear-view camera functions as designed.

While this is the first recall for the 2025 Taycan, it’s not the only one to impact Porsche’s flagship EV. Earlier this month, Porsche announced it was recalling 27,720 examples of the 2020-2024MY Taycan due to the potential of the high-voltage battery pack developing a short circuit. These models have batteries sourced from LG Energy Solution, and while Porsche is developing an onboard diagnostics system to detect battery anomalies, it won’t be ready until the first quarter of 2025. Until then, affected Taycan owners are being told to limit charging to 80% capacity—a band-aid fix for a bigger problem.

Almost 1,000 new BMW 5-Series and 7-Series models are being recalled in the United States due to an issue with the steering spindle.

BMW believes that roughly 1% of the 982 vehicles involved in the recall are impacted. It says that the specifications of the spindle’s double universal joint may not have been “appropriate for the application,” and as such, the swivel socket could get damaged during certain steering maneuvers. If it breaks, this means it would require more effort from the driver to steer the car. The recall notice says this increases the risk of a crash.

Review: The BMW i7 M70 xDrive Is Electric Excellence

The recall impacts 2024-2025 530i xDrive and 540i xDrive models built between June 17, 2024, and July 17, 2024, 2024-2025 i5 eDrive40, i5 xDrive40, and i5 M60 models manufactured from June 17, 2024, to July 18, 2024, 2024 740i xDrive and 760i xDrives assembled from June 17, 2024, to July 16, 2024, 2024 750e xDrives made from June 18, 2024, and July 1, 2024, as well as 2024 i7 eDrive50, i7 xDrive60, and i7 M70 models made between June 18, 2024, and July 3, 2024.

The car manufacturer first became aware of a potential issue on June 26, 2024, when a damaged steering spindle was noticed at one of BMW’s assembly plants. An investigation quickly followed, and additional damaged steering spindles were found. A decision to issue a recall was made on September 18, 2024.

BMW isn’t aware of any warranty claims, customer complaints, or field reports that could be related to the issue, nor does it know of any accidents or injuries.

Dealers were alerted to the recall on September 25 and owners will be notified by First Class mail from November 15. Authorized BMW centers have been instructed to replace the steering spindle’s double universal joint free of charge.

Bankrupt electric automaker Fisker has put forward a controversial proposal to force owners to shoulder labor costs for several recall-related repairs. However, the U.S. Department of Justice, speaking on behalf of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), has stated that such a move would be illegal under federal law.

In mid-September, Fisker revealed that owners would need to pay for labor costs related to two ongoing recalls for the Ocean. The first is related to faulty door handles, and the second is for a faulty water pump which can trigger a loss of power. The EV startup briefly reversed this decision but then did another 180, confirming that owners would indeed need to pay.

According to the NHTSA, this is forbidden by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, which all car manufacturers must comply with.

Read: Fisker Flip Flops Again, Requires Owners To Pay For Recall Repairs, But Feds Beg To Differ

Under this act, manufacturers must remedy all vehicle defects or areas of noncompliance without charge to the customer. Fisker’s liquidation plan wants to establish a fund to pay for recall-related parts, but only if such recalls don’t cost more than $750,000 in parts.

It also specifically states that vehicle owners must cover labor expenses and may only be reimbursed at a later date through the Fisker Owners Association, which could receive funds in future litigation against Fisker’s parts suppliers. There are no guarantees, however, that these funds will be recovered and owners will be reimbursed.

The US Department of Justice filed its objection to the plan in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, stating that “The Safety Act is clear that all costs associated with remedying defective and noncompliant vehicles must be covered by the manufacturer; the Act makes no distinction between parts and labor.” The NHTSA adds that it “may have a priority claim against the Estate” of Fisker if it fails to comply with the Safety Act.

“The United States requests the Amended DS and Plan either be revised so that it complies with the Safety Act, or otherwise rejected; (2) the Plan’s confirmation order includes language preserving the United States’ federal interests; and (3) any and further relief as the Court deems necessary and just,” the court filing adds.

As of now, Fisker has not yet responded to the Department of Justice’s objection to its recall plan.