Emissions from buildings make up about two-thirds of the greenhouse gas footprint of Indianapolis. So when the city committed to slash emissions, in its 2019 climate action plan and then as part of the Bloomberg American Cities Climate Challenge in 2020, leaders knew where they had to start.

A 2021 ordinance requires all buildings over 50,000 square feet and publicly-owned buildings over 25,000 square feet to do energy benchmarking and report results to the city, to be made publicly available by 2026. 

The deadline to comply was July 1, 2024. But at year’s end, only about 20% of the 1,500 buildings covered had complied — even though the process can be done in a matter of hours using EPA’s ENERGYSTAR Portfolio manager software. The city also hosted workshops to help walk building managers through the process.

Now the city’s challenge is to boost benchmarking compliance. The penalties for failing to comply are low: fines of $100 the first year and $250 yearly after that. Chicago’s 2013 benchmarking ordinance, by comparison, includes fines of $100 for the first day of a violation and up to $25 each day thereafter, with a maximum fine of $9,200 per year — and the city has a much higher compliance rate.

Lindsay Trameri, community engagement manager for the Indianapolis Office of Sustainability, said the office is continuing outreach, including sending postcards to all relevant building managers and owners. 

“We’re not assessing fines yet, but we’re making sure they’re aware this isn’t a city program that’s going away, it is indeed local law,” Trameri said. “And there are benefits to be gleaned from participating. It might cost hundreds of dollars not to participate, but you could save thousands if you participate and take it seriously.”

Trameri said 27 publicly-owned buildings in the consolidated city and county government must be benchmarked, and the city is planning to use about $800,000 worth of federal Department of Energy funding to hire an energy manager “who will be solely focused on looking at city-owned buildings and how to make them more energy efficient.” 

In Indiana, reducing buildings’ electricity use is particularly urgent since the state got about 45% of its power from coal in 2023. The benchmarking mandate doesn’t require buildings to take any action based on their energy results, but benchmarking often motivates building owners and municipalities to invest in savings, experts say. 

Cities participating in the Bloomberg program saw 3% to 8% energy reductions and millions in savings, with nearly 400 million square feet now covered by benchmarking policies and over 37,000 energy audits completed, according to Kelly Shultz, who leads Bloomberg Philanthropies” sustainable cities initiative. 

Success stories

Though overall compliance is low, some major public and private entities have completed benchmarking in Indianapolis, including the airport, convention center, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, Target and JC Penney. 

Phil Day, facilities director for the museum, noted that it’s crucial for museums to keep consistent levels of humidity and temperature. That means high energy use, and also vulnerability to blackouts or energy price spikes. Benchmarking has helped him develop plans for reducing natural gas and electricity use with smaller boilers and heat pumps distributed throughout the facilities, a possible geothermal chilling system, and better insulation. These innovations should save money and make the museum more resilient to energy disruptions.

“Museums aren’t typically known as an energy efficient facility, but it is always high on my priority list in everything we program or replace,” Day said.

The firm Cenergistic has done benchmarking since 2017 for Indianapolis Public Schools, and identified more than $1 million in wasteful energy costs that could be cut across 71 schools. Under Cenergistic’s contract, it is paid half of the energy savings it secures. Seventeen school buildings have obtained EPA Energy Star status based on their energy efficiency improvements, Cenergistic CEO Dennis Harris said. 

“Benchmarking provided a clear starting point by identifying high-energy-consuming facilities and systems,” Harris said. “Cenergistic energy specialists track energy consumption at all campuses with the company’s software platform, identifying waste and driving conservation. By consistently reviewing this data, Cenergistic continues to work with IPS to make data-driven decisions, set measurable goals, and continually refine its strategy for maximum impact.” 

Trameri said the schools’ success is “a great message to point to. If they can do it, we can do it. Of course, we want those millions to go back into classrooms and teachers and students versus out the door for utility costs.”

Learning by example

Trameri said in developing its benchmarking program and ordinance, Indianapolis has relied on guidance and lessons from other cities including Columbus, Ohio and Chicago, both fellow participants in the Bloomberg challenge. 

In Chicago, about 85% of the 3,700 buildings covered by the ordinance are in compliance, said Amy Jewel, vice president of programs at Elevate, the organization that oversees Chicago’s program. She said nine out of 10 buildings complied even right after the ordinance took effect, thanks to years of organizing by city leaders and NGOs like the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“A large number of building owners recognized this was coming. They engaged in the process, and saw their fingerprints within the ordinance,” said Lindy Wordlaw, director of climate and environmental justice initiatives for the city of Chicago. 

Chicago passed an additional ordinance creating an energy rating program, where buildings receive a score of 0 to 4 based on their energy benchmarking results. An 11-by-17-inch placard with the score and explanation must be publicly posted, “similar to a food safety rating for a restaurant,” Wordlaw said.

In 2021, Chicago reported that median energy use per square foot had dropped by 7% over the past three years, and greenhouse gas emissions had dropped 37% since 2016 in buildings subject to the ordinance. City public housing and buildings owned by the Archdiocese were among those to do early benchmarking and investments.

Along with Philadelphia, New York and Washington D.C., Chicago was among the nation’s first major cities to institute benchmarking. Jewel said they hope to keep sharing lessons learned.

For example, “it’s actually pretty hard to come up with the covered buildings list,” Jewel noted, since there is no central list of all buildings in a city but rather various records “all used for slightly different purposes — the property tax database, different sources tracking violations. It took a bit of time to get that list together, and it takes time to maintain it as buildings are constructed or demolished.”

In Indianapolis, Trameri said they are hopeful more buildings will get with the program as awareness grows about the requirement.

“There has always been evidence that you can’t manage what you don’t measure,” said Trameri. “It’s a market-based strategy. Truly once a facilities owner or manager is able to look at their energy usage over a month, 12 months, or multiple years and make evidence-based decisions based on that data, it will affect your bottom line, and those savings you can reinvest into whatever your organization’s mission is.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story misattributed performance information about Bloomberg Philanthropies’ sustainable cities initiative.

Indianapolis grapples with low compliance on energy benchmarking requirement for large buildings is an article from Energy News Network, a nonprofit news service covering the clean energy transition. If you would like to support us please make a donation.

ELKHART, Ind. – It is with deep sadness that Forest River, Inc. announces the passing of its founder, Peter J. Liegl. Pete not only was a visionary leader who transformed the RV industry, but one of Indiana’s proudest citizens and most generous philanthropists. He is survived by his wife Sharon, daughter Lisa L. Rees, son-in-law Logan Rees, and grandchildren Adrienne (6) and Ryan (3) and brother-in-law Gary Chamberlin.

Pete is best known as the founder of Forest River, Inc., and the man who in 2005 sold Forest River to famed investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. But his legendary role in building the RV industry into a multibillion-dollar enterprise began from humble beginnings. Sales and management positions brought him valuable experience in production, operations, and customer service. He worked his way to the role of president at Midas Motorhomes and then on to Shasta, a Coachmen-owned company, before deciding to venture out on his own when he co-founded Cobra Industries. Cobra Industries went public and Pete was “fired.” This led him to build his first RV by hand in a barn. Driven to succeed, Liegl brought his first units to Louisville and sold them outside under a lamp post which was the beginning of “Where the forest meets the river.”

In 1996, Liegl established Forest River, Inc. in Elkhart, Indiana, with the vision of bringing the power of nature to as many Americans as possible. His goal was to create a company that could meet a wide range of consumer needs, and he did just that. Forest River grew rapidly under his leadership, expanding its product range to include not only RVs but also buses, cargo trailers, and marine products. He believed in providing the best product at the best price. His strategic acquisitions and commitment to innovation helped Forest River to become one of the largest RV manufacturers in North America.

His management philosophy emphasized empowering employees, fostering a culture of accountability, and always focusing on the needs of the consumer. “We don’t take ourselves too seriously,” he said recently. “But we’re very serious about what we do.”

In 2024, despite announcing a succession plan for the company, Pete Liegl remained at the helm of what he called “the quiet company,” working every day including Saturdays and Sundays while presiding over a slate of internal innovations and investments that will provide the foundation for growth and excellence for years to come.

Pete, to anyone that knew him for more than a minute, found meaning and inspiration from his namesake, the Apostle Peter. Peter’s story inspired transformation, and Pete’s journey inspired many, while highlighting themes of redemption, leadership, and unwavering commitment to one’s beliefs.

Pete was very proud of his roots in Elkhart, and privately made generous philanthropic contributions, supporting causes in education, healthcare, conservation and local communities. In the end, it is his determined strength of character, booming laugh and a twinkle in the eye that will leave a lasting impact on those who knew him best.

About Forest River, Inc.
Founded in 1996 by Pete Liegl, Forest River, Inc. has evolved into North America’s largest manufacturer of recreational vehicles, cargo trailers, pontoon boats, and commercial vehicles including buses, vans, and trucks. Its portfolio includes market share leaders in every category, and it is the country’s leading manufacturer of buses and vans for both the private and public sectors. Based in Elkhart, Indiana, Forest River employs 14,000+ employees in 100+ facilities in more than a half dozen states. With a commitment to excellence and a focus on customer satisfaction, Forest River is proud to be a Berkshire Hathaway company.

The post Forest River, Inc. Mourns the Passing of Founder Pete Liegl, Celebrating His Visionary Leadership and Philanthropy appeared first on School Transportation News.

A mother is demanding action after her daughter was left behind by her school bus during a field trip to a pumpkin patch last month, reported WRTV.

According to the news report, 6-year-old Cianni Allen was found wandering alone in the pumpkin patch at Tuttle Orchards in Greenfield, Indiana, after she was left behind during a school trip for two hours.

Allen’s classmates and teachers reportedly boarded a bus and traveled 26 miles back to school without her.

Allen’s mother, Dearra, was alerted when she received a panicked call from staff at Christel House Academy West regarding the incident. She rushed to the school while a teacher went to pick up Allen at the orchards.

Dearra told local news reporters that despite the school’s apologies and their “attempt to keep her quiet” she is not letting this go and has contacted lawyers. She says the class left the orchard at 2 p.m. and arrived back at the school at 2:45 p.m. Staff did not realize Allen was missing until the patch called the school and notified them.

Allen reportedly returned to school at 4:30 p.m., almost two hours after the rest of her classmates.

---

Related: Louisiana Child Left Alone in School Bus for 5 Hours
Related: 6-Year-Old Left on School Bus for Hours
Related: Ohio Child Left in School Bus Parking Compound
Related: Georgia Students Left on School Bus for Hours

The post Indiana Student Abandoned by School Bus at Halloween Event appeared first on School Transportation News.

Ryan & Tony look at contractor First Student’s bus technology experiments, the upcoming elections, a New York bus company’s fraud scheme, a bus driver’s book on anxiety for student riders, and additional safety efforts.

Amy Rosa, director of transportation for Wa-Nee Community Schools in Indiana, talks winning a Top Transportation Teams award at STN EXPO Reno in July, driver retention efforts, technology implementation, effective student safety practices, and success with electric buses.

Read more about operations.

This episode is brought to you by Transfinder.

 

 

Stream, subscribe and download the School Transportation Nation podcast on Apple Podcasts, Deezer, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, RadioPublic, Spotify, Stitcher and YouTube.

The post (STN Podcast E233) Fraud in New York & Cohesive Indiana ‘Top Transportation Team’ appeared first on School Transportation News.

A prospective buyer’s recent commitment to reinvest in a Gary, Indiana, steel plant sought to address union and government leaders’ worries about the sale’s potential impact on jobs and U.S. steelmaking capacity.

The plan to extend the life of the country’s largest and most carbon-emitting coal-fired blast furnace, however, has also heightened concerns from Northwest Indiana residents most affected by the facility’s air pollution.

“This is not acceptable,” said Susan Thomas, director of legislation and policy for Just Transition Northwest Indiana. “We now have technology for doing this much more sustainably.”

A study released Monday quantifies the public health threat highlighted by local clean air advocates, linking the Indiana plant to dozens of annual emergency room visits and premature deaths, as well as thousands of asthma attacks. 

Japan-based Nippon Steel is seeking approval from U.S. regulators for a $15 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel, the storied domestic steelmaker whose facilities include the Gary Works plant in Northwest Indiana, along with others in Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania, key battleground states where the proposed sale has been a subject of presidential campaigning. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump oppose the sale, as does President Joe Biden.

Much of the public discussion around the proposed sale has centered on its economic and national security implications, but those living near the plant have different concerns and demands. They say they’ve suffered for too long from steel industry pollution, and they only want Nippon as a neighbor if the company installs a new type of furnace that burns with lower or even zero emissions. 

“I would love to see Gary Works transform to green sustainable steel, bringing more jobs, cleaning up the area, that would be an amazing win-win,” said Libré Booker, a librarian who grew up near the mill. “The people have lived under these conditions for far too long. It’s definitely time for a change.”

Gary Works is the largest integrated steel mill in North America, employing about 2,200 people. Northwest Indiana is also home to two other steel mills — Burns Harbor and Indiana Harbor — and two coke plants that turn coal into the high-density raw material for steel. 

The populations in a three-mile radius of the Gary Works and Indiana Harbor steel mills are 96%-97% people of color, and almost two-thirds low-income people. The new study by Industrious Labs, a nonprofit focused on emissions reduction, used the EPA’s COBRA model to find emissions from the Gary Works plant likely are linked to 57-114 premature deaths, 48 emergency room visits and almost 32,000 asthma attacks each year.

The report cited the mills’ and coke plants’ emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and lead, all pollutants with direct impacts on public health. Gary Works is the number one emitter of PM2.5 particulate matter in the state, according to the company’s self-reported data analyzed by Industrious Labs. 

Industrious Labs steel director Hilary Lewis said the results bolster the demands of clean steel advocates, who want to see coal-fired blast furnaces replaced by direct-reduction iron, or DRI, furnaces powered by hydrogen made with renewable energy, known as green hydrogen. 

Booker was among 15 locals who participated in a recent “Sustainable Steel Community Cohort” run by Industrious Labs, attending five workshops learning about the science and policy of cleaner steel. 

Green hydrogen, green steel 

Green hydrogen is still not produced in large quantities anywhere in the U.S., and all the hydrogen currently produced in the country would not even be enough to power one steel mill, noted Seth Snyder, a partner in the Clean Energy Venture Group, at a recent conference in Chicago focused on clean hydrogen. 

But DRI furnaces can be powered by natural gas, which results in much lower emissions than coal. Cleveland Cliffs — which owns the Indiana Harbor and Burns Harbor mills — is transforming its Middletown, Ohio steel mill to gas-burning DRI with the help of a $500 million incentive under the Inflation Reduction Act. The company says the conversion will make it the steel mill with the lowest emissions in the world. 

With some modifications, DRI furnaces can burn a blend of natural gas and hydrogen or almost entirely hydrogen, experts say, meaning investment in a gas-burning DRI furnace could be a step on the way to “clean steel.” Lewis and other advocates, however, say gas-burning furnaces are not their goal, and they want the industry to transition off fossil fuels entirely. 

Hydrogen can be blended into fuel for traditional blast furnaces too, but the maximum emissions reductions that can be achieved that way are 21%, according to a paper on hydrogen-powered steel production in Europe by the Norwegian non-profit science organization Bellona. 

Nippon has announced it would invest $300 million in restoring the aging blast furnace at Gary Works, keeping it running for another 20 years. Installing a DRI furnace, meanwhile, typically costs over $1 billion.

“There is a gap,” said Lewis. “But these companies have the funding available. They have the money to make these decisions, they’re just choosing not to.” 

Incentives for change 

The IRA incentives tapped by Cleveland Cliffs are no longer available, but this summer California U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna introduced the Modern Steel Act, which would provide $10 billion in low-cost loans and grants, plus tax breaks and other incentives for new and revamped low-emissions steel mills, including hydrogen-fueled DRI.

Separately, lucrative tax credits soon to be available for “clean hydrogen” under the IRA could also make hydrogen-powered steel more financially viable. The specific rules for the tax credit — known as 45V — are still being finalized, amid controversy over what should qualify a project’s hydrogen as “clean.” 

“There are a number of different incentives in the IRA that can help steel companies build out their own green hydrogen infrastructure,” Lewis said. “Everything should be on the table. Steel companies would be such huge off-takers for green hydrogen, they can build their own economy here.”

At the BP Whiting oil refinery, 10 miles from Gary Works, there are plans underway for production of blue hydrogen, or hydrogen made with natural gas followed by capture and sequestration of the emissions. The plan is a marquee part of the Midwest (MachH2) hydrogen hub, one of seven planned hubs nationwide slated to receive $7 billion total in federal funding. Such blue hydrogen could be used to power a steel mill, with theoretically no resulting greenhouse gas or public health-harming emissions.

However, local environmental and public accountability leaders are strongly opposed to blue hydrogen production in the region, since carbon sequestration has not yet been done successfully on a large scale in the U.S., and it would entail pipelines carrying carbon dioxide from the refinery to a sequestration site. 

“The carbon capture component makes us very nervous, it seems to me they’re rushing into this without really taking the time to study it more seriously,” said Northwest Indiana resident Connie Wachala, another graduate of the sustainable steel program. “That might be because of all the money DOE is making available to industry. I wish our elected and industry officials would start thinking more creatively about how to make [green hydrogen] happen, how to make things better for the people in the neighborhoods and around the steel mills as well as for the shareholders.”

A different future 

All four of Wachala’s grandparents came from Poland to work in the steel mills. 

“Growing up in the 1950s, I remember my mom hanging the laundry up in the yard on a clothes line. If the wind was blowing a certain way, you’d get black particles on the clothes,” remembered Wachala, who worked as a creative writing teacher before retiring. “My dad’s car was always covered with that soot.”

Booker’s mother worked as a crane operator at the now-closed Bethlehem Steel mill in Burns Harbor, Indiana — among the first wave of women of color to be hired.

“I was proud she worked in the mill and took care of us, but I did not want [that job] whatsoever, seeing her come home every night after the swing shift, with the big old boots and jacket,” said Booker. “I wanted to go to college. It was a source of contention with my mom and I for some years.” 

That was in the days when locals largely believed, “if you want a good partner, you’ve got to get one that works in the mill,” she continued. “It was like a prestigious job and position. People looked up to people who worked in the mill.” 

Now, Booker laments, “Gary is like a joke,” scorned for its economic decline since the steel industry automated and shrunk — hemorrhaging jobs, and for the pollution that is still emitted. If the merger with Nippon does not go through, it’s widely believed U.S. Steel would eventually close the mill, as it closed its South Works plant in Southeast Chicago decades ago. At their height, the South Works and Gary Works plants together employed about 40,000 people in the Chicago area. 

Thomas wrote a frustrated rebuttal to the Chicago Tribune editorial board opining that the Nippon merger was crucial to Gary’s future. She and other local leaders say they don’t want the mill to close, but they can demand better than the extension of heavily polluting industry. 

“It’s just perpetuation of this as a sacrifice zone,” said Thomas. “‘This is what you’ve always been, this is how we’re going to keep you.’ But that’s not going to fly anymore.”

Steelmaker’s bid to buy U.S. Steel would extend life of Indiana plant — along with its emissions is an article from Energy News Network, a nonprofit news service covering the clean energy transition. If you would like to support us please make a donation.

A newly published study examining property values near dozens of large Midwest solar farms has found no significant negative impact — and even a slight positive effect — from the projects, according to the data. 

Loyola University researcher Gilbert Michaud has attended scores of community meetings about proposed solar projects across the Midwest. In past research, he quantified that property values were the most common concern brought up in local hearings about proposed utility-scale solar.

And while solar arrays may have an aesthetic impact, property values are influenced by a wide range of other factors, such as the quality of schools and the local economy.

“I’ve observed a lot of the negative comments framed as ‘I think’ or ‘I saw something on social media,’” said Michaud, an assistant professor of environmental policy at the School of Environmental Sustainability at Loyola University Chicago. So he sought to “elevate the discussion from ‘I think, I think, I think,’” by injecting it with some hard data.

His latest study, published in the December 2024 issue of the journal Solar Compass, looked at property values surrounding 70 utility-scale solar projects in the Midwest and found they actually had a minor positive effect — increasing values 0.5% to 2%. 

“While the impact itself — of a few thousand dollars — might not be incredibly meaningful,” said Michaud, “clearly these projects drive economic development in rural communities, through jobs, tax contributions, etcetera, which in turn increase residential property values.”

Emotions running high 

Michael Wildermuth, a landowner in Allen County, Ohio, was glad to hear about the proposed 300 MW Birch Solar farm, since he supports clean energy and welcomed the economic benefits. Wildermuth cofounded an organization, Allen Auglaize Coalition for Reasonable Energy (named for the two counties where the project would be sited), to advocate for the project as it faced local opposition.

“The nearest neighbors became enraged so quickly and voiced their rage so loudly that others were placed in a reactionary mode,” Wildermuth said. “The neighbors were greatly concerned with property values and flooding. The landowners were afraid of these vocal neighbors, the public officials were afraid of being on the wrong side of a political ‘hot potato’ issue.”

The developer appealed to the Ohio State Supreme Court, and Allen Auglaize Coalition for Reasonable Energy filed an amicus brief in support of the solar farm. Wildermuth wishes more data about property values had been available during the debate. He also thinks opponents ignored the $81 million the developer estimated it would contribute to the economy, with local officials saying the project would have little local economic benefit since the power would go to an Amazon facility.

“Just get people ‘all het up’ and you don’t have to deal with reason and facts,” Wildermuth said.

“Do I think solar farms could actually improve property values or the financial well-being of landowners and neighbors of solar farms? Yes, I do. We argued that. We also pointed out that, in the rural area where the farm was planned, the properties would remain stable for 30 years,” preventing them from being developed for other purposes that neighbors may find less desirable. 

Shining new light

The study, co-authored by Loyola graduate Sampson Hao, notes that the benefits of rooftop solar on energy bills and property values are well-documented. But less is known about how utility-scale solar farms impact nearby properties — even though utility-scale solar accounts for about three-quarters of new solar development. 

The study reviewed 70 solar farms built in the Midwest between 2009 and 2022, from a database by Berkeley Laboratory including solar farms over 5 MW. Hao and Michaud analyzed property values compiled by real estate firm Zillow, comparing values five years before a solar project became operational, with values at the operational date, which is often about two years after construction starts. 

They aggregated by zip code, and controlled for factors like the COVID-19 pandemic that could affect housing values in a given year. Three-bedroom houses were used as a measure of overall property values. They also analyzed “control group” zip codes near the solar farm zip codes, but without solar farms, to account for other factors that might affect property values.

Michaud noted that while the number of bedrooms and other factors have a much larger impact on property values, the small positive impact that nearby solar farms could have could be similar to that of cultural amenities, like arts centers. Solar farms can also have an impact on schools — a major factor in determining property values — since solar projects augment local tax bases. Solar developers also often make ongoing contributions to school districts in the form of donations, supplies and energy education opportunities. 

The study showed high numbers of solar farms going online in 2017 and 2021, with a smaller spike in 2020. 

The projects included in the study range from a 10 MW urban installation in Chicago, installed by Exelon in 2010, to the 268 MW Riverstart Solar Park in Indiana, from 2021. Only 11 of the 70 projects studied were over 100 MW in capacity. Indiana had the most arrays at 22, followed by 14 in Minnesota, eight in Michigan and seven in Illinois. 

The most beneficial impact on property values was from solar farms between 5 and 20 MW in size, perhaps in part because these can be hidden by vegetative buffers. 

“The paper is not about a house that’s 200 feet away from a solar project, that’s very rarely the case,” said Hao, noting that developers often offer to buy properties at above market value in such situations. “We wanted to look at a bigger scale. A project between 5 and 20 MW, you’re really not supposed to even see these with your bare eyes.”

Midwestern focus 

Michaud said that debunking myths around solar farms is particularly important in the Midwest, where there is much untapped potential for solar. While it has less sun than the Southeast and California, which have led the nation in solar farm development, the Midwest has massive stretches of agricultural land where solar can be deployed along with crops.

“This is a really important finding for Midwestern government officials, land owners, and many others to know about,” Michaud said. “Many of these folks are now making decisions about whether to host a large-scale solar project in their community, and the potential impacts to property values is often something that comes up in local debates and at local hearings. Data can help tell a story and move the debate beyond anecdotal or subjective arguments.”

The Loyola study cites a 2018 analysis of 956 specific solar farms by a University of Texas researcher that found no conclusive evidence of impact on property values one way or another. The Loyola researchers also noted a study by Berkeley Laboratory that found about a 1% decline in property values around 2,000 solar farms in six states on the east and west coasts and in Minnesota.

“Most Midwestern states have 10 to 20 gigawatts of potential utility-scale solar in their queue, and developers are coming off of the coasts where the grid is more congested and there is less land for development, targeting agricultural land in the center of the country,” Michaud said. “Finding a large plot of land with good solar irradiation and access to a substation is the sweet spot for a lot of solar developers, and in essence, positive attributes of farming crops in the Midwest are also positive attributes for farming ground-mounted, large-scale solar.” 

Perception becomes reality 

The study notes the irony that perception plays a significant role in determining property values, and fears about property value declines can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. 

“Projection and speculation drive market forces,” Michaud said. “A farmer might be angry that a solar farm is going in the community, he’s going to sell and move to Florida. A buyer thinks, ‘maybe I can negotiate this price down,’ and the house sells for less than its value, and an appraiser looks at that. But none of this is real, it’s just based on speculation and emotion, which then drives data points … it all started with an emotional response.” 

Hao theorized that developers who make poor choices in siting and managing solar farms can have an impact on property values elsewhere, if negative stories about solar spread by word of mouth or social media. 

“Is a developer doing their best to have as much of a buffer as economically feasible?” he asked. “Is the developer making vegetative screenings so you’re not going to see millions of panels? Is the developer doing their best to move the inverter to the center of the leased land so noise doesn’t get over the road? There’s a lot of things at the end of the day that developers can do better. It’s up to the developers to really step up their game to eliminate those potential negative effects.” 

The Loyola study notes that solar developers often do things like hosting county fairs or supporting local organizations that can increase property values. Michaud said it’s possible such dynamics were reflected in their data showing small increases in property values, along with other benefits.

“From an economic perspective,” Michaud said, “locals should increasingly look at these data to understand the job opportunities, wages paid, new tax revenues and negligible or positive impacts on property values, and realize that large-scale solar projects might actually be an amenity in their community.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated Michael Wildermuth planned to lease land for the Birch solar project, and that he personally filed an amicus brief in the case. The story has also been updated to clarify the scope of Gilbert Michaud’s research.

Midwest study finds solar farms don’t hurt property values — and they may even boost them is an article from Energy News Network, a nonprofit news service covering the clean energy transition. If you would like to support us please make a donation.

ELKHART, Ind. – Since 1996, Forest River, Inc. has remained a leader of the recreational vehicle, cargo trailer, pontoon boat, and commercial vehicle industries. Today, Forest River is proud to continue this legacy with changes to its leadership team.

Founder and CEO Pete Liegl announced three leadership changes designed to continue Forest River’s forward trajectory and dedication to customer satisfaction.
– Chief Financial Officer Darrel Ritchie will lead Corporate Management. Having started with Forest River in 2002, Ritchie brings deep understanding of the company and is poised to continue the Forest River commitment to excellence.
– David Wright, another 22-year expert, will assume management of Forest River’s Commercial Division, inclusive of buses, vans, trucks and cargo trailers.
– Doug Gaeddert, who has run towable divisions for 25+ years, will now oversee Forest River’s entire Recreational Vehicles Division including towables and motorized.

Pete Liegl remains CEO and will continue to lead strategic oversight of Forest River. “I believe it is important to envision the future and plan for a smooth transition for the continued legacy of Forest River, Inc.” said Liegl. “I will remain fully engaged and devote significant time to help the incoming leaders.”

About Forest River, Inc.
Founded in 1996 by Pete Liegl, Forest River, Inc. has evolved into North America’s largest manufacturer of recreational vehicles, cargo trailers, pontoon boats, buses, vans, and commercial vehicles. Its portfolio includes market share leaders in every category, and it is the country’s leading manufacturer of buses and vans for both the private and public sectors. Based in Elkhart, Indiana, Forest River employs 14,000+ employees in 100+ facilities in more than a half dozen states. With a commitment to excellence and a focus on customer satisfaction, Forest River is proud to be a Berkshire Hathaway company.

The post Forest River, Inc. Announces Management Updates appeared first on School Transportation News.

Less than a year out from the rescheduled 17th National Congress on School Transportation, there has been a leadership shakeup.

Patrick McManamon, the education unit supervisor for the Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles and a former president of the National Association of State Directors of Pupil Transportation (NASDPTS), stepped down as chairman of the NCST steering committee.

“The NCST Steering Committee has acknowledged the resignation of Pat McManamon as NCST chair for ‘professional and personal reasons,” announced NASDPTS, which manages NCST, in an email to members Monday morning. “The NCST Steering Committee thanks Pat for his tireless efforts and wishes him well.”

NASDPTS also said Michael LaRocco, the director of the office of school transportation and also an association past-president, assumes the role as NCST chair. He was already a member of the steering committee.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused the postponement of the NCST proceedings that had been planned for May 2020. Rather than reschedule for the following years, NCST decided to wait until the next scheduled dates, which are May 3-7, 2025, in Des Moines, Iowa, to hold deliberations.

Meanwhile, proposals for changes to the National School Transportation Specifications were due to respective writing committees on July 1. Writing committee draft proposals are due to writing committee coordinators by Oct. 1. The draft proposals then must be turned into the Editing and Technical Assistance committees by Nov. 1 and published online by Dec. 1.

Feb. 1, 2005, is the deadline for public comments, recommendations and new proposals.

The newest writing committee is on non-traditional vehicles, otherwise known as alternative transportation using sedans, SUVs and vans.

---

Related: Updated: NCST Takes on Issue of Non-School Bus Transportation
Related: NCST Committee Members Forge Full Steam Ahead Despite COVID-19 Delay
Related: NCST Postponed Again Due to COVID-19 Travel, Public Health Restrictions

The post McManamon Citing ‘Personal and Professional Reasons’ Relinquishes NCST Chair appeared first on School Transportation News.

Indiana ratepayers spend hundreds of millions of dollars per year for power from coal plants that are operating despite the availability of cheaper sources, including wind and solar.  

The state is emblematic of a larger problem, as electricity market rules typically allow utility-owned power plants to essentially cut in line even when they are not the most economical option for customers.  

A recent report commissioned by the Natural Resources Defense Council examined how this phenomenon plays out in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) regional transmission organization specifically, building on previous research by RMI, the Union of Concerned Scientists and others — all of which show that uneconomic coal plant dispatch takes a huge toll on ratepayer wallets and public health. 

The problem happens primarily with vertically integrated utilities or municipal utilities and cooperatives, which can recoup costs of fuel and operations from ratepayers even if they are operating at a loss. In most of MISO territory, energy markets have not been restructured as open markets, making such cost recapture the norm. 

The NRDC study showed that Indiana ratepayers bore the second-highest burden in MISO, paying $338 million for uneconomic coal power from 2021-2023, just behind Louisiana’s $341 million. North Dakota ratepayers spent an extra $120 million, Wisconsin $69 million, and Minnesota $54 million, the study found. 

Indiana’s R.M. Schahfer plant, run by utility NIPSCO, cost ratepayers more than $100 million in such uneconomical dispatch from 2021-2023, the NRDC study found. 

In an ongoing rate case, Duke Energy is seeking to increase reliance on its Gibson and Cayuga plants in Indiana. These plants were responsible for $29 million and $7.6 million in uneconomic dispatch costs to consumers in 2023, according to RMI’s economic dispatch dashboard. 

“This has been a problem plaguing Indiana coal plants for many years, it’s costing our consumers in Indiana millions of dollars and it’s one of the factors driving rates higher and driving clean energy off the grid,” said Ben Inskeep, program director for Citizens Action Coalition in Indiana. “It’s a tale of utilities making bad decisions as part of their profit motive and then utility regulators failing to hold them accountable as they’re supposed to. Certainly utilities should be operating their plants efficiently and economically, and when they fail to do so, they shouldn’t be getting cost recovery.” 

Duke spokesperson Angeline Protogere said the study misses important context. 

“There are a lot of considerations that go into plant dispatch decisions, and the priority is always reliability of service and economics,” Protogere said. “We weren’t able to replicate the NRDC data, but it appears it’s based on incomplete information. For example, there are times when MISO calls on a unit because of grid reliability needs. There’s a bigger picture that’s not reflected here.”

Skewed markets

The NRDC study found that over three years across MISO, about 400 MW of wind power was curtailed in favor of power from coal plants generating at higher-than-market costs. 

Power producers bid into regional energy reverse-auctions for real-time and next-day power, offering the price for which they can produce their electricity. Grid operators like MISO and PJM are supposed to dispatch the power starting with the most affordable option, until demand is met. 

Even if vertically integrated utilities are not selling their power on the open market but rather serving their own customers, they still need to be dispatched by the grid operator to send their energy onto the grid. 

But under the rules for MISO and other grid operators, coal plants can “self-commit” to run for a given time period even if they cannot produce power below the market rate. The idea is that coal plants can’t ramp up or down quickly, so they may need to keep running at a certain level to be ready to provide more power when needed.  

If this relatively expensive coal power weren’t on the grid, more wind power would be purchased and demand for new renewables would likely be created. 

“That increment of power would be filled through the market selecting the next highest bidder,” providing “an accurate picture of what electricity should cost that gives a signal that incentivizes newer generation,” explained James Gignac, Union of Concerned Scientists Midwest senior policy manager. 

The lower the energy prices at a given time and the lower the demand, the worse the coal plant dispatch problem gets. Data from RMI and a 2020 report by the Union of Concerned Scientists shows that ratepayer losses due to uneconomic coal dispatch were lower in 2022, because Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused natural gas prices to spike, making coal more competitive by comparison. Conversely, when energy demand plummeted in 2020 because of the pandemic, uneconomic dispatch of coal plants soared. 

Since 2015, the uneconomic dispatch of coal plants has cost Indiana ratepayers $1.9 billion and ratepayers nationwide $20 billion, according to RMI’s dashboard. 

The issue has real impacts on the growth of renewables, experts note. If the practice was prevented, market prices would be higher and there would be more incentive for renewable developers to build projects to sell their power on the open market. Meanwhile if vertically-integrated utilities were not allowed to recoup their costs for uneconomic dispatch, they would be motivated not to run coal plants and might decide to invest in building renewables instead, or at least buy wind power on the open market.    

“I’ve talked with [wind] developers who say they look at where coal plants self-commit uneconomically, and they avoid those transmission lines because they know they will be curtailed,” said Joseph Daniel, principal in RMI’s Carbon Free Electricity team and lead author of the Union of Concerned Scientists report. 

That report shows that if uneconomic coal dispatch was avoided, Indiana customers would save money — but not as much money as ratepayers in other states, because there is less wind power available around Indiana. Over time, a market unfettered by uneconomic coal plants might correct this situation. 

“The greatest immediate savings for customers from stopping uneconomic coal plant operations are in areas where there are existing low-cost resources such as wind power being curtailed by that behavior,” said Gignac. “If the replacement for the uneconomic coal generation is something like a relatively higher-cost gas plant, then the market clearing price is higher and customer savings are not as significant. However, that higher clearing price is a signal and an incentive for low-cost renewables to locate projects in that area and deliver further cost savings. 

“Removing the market distortion of uneconomic coal operations helps move us toward the cleaner, lower-cost energy system we need.” 

Solutions   

Studies show that coal plants that sell their power on the open market – known as “merchant” plants – rarely decide to operate when they are not getting market prices at least equal to their cost of operating – the way vertically-integrated or publicly-owned coal plants do when they know they can recoup their costs from ratepayers, without compensation from the market. In other words, merchant plants do not ask grid operators to be uneconomically dispatched. 

These merchant plants nonetheless seem to ramp up in time to operate when their power is needed, experts note, indicating that vertically-integrated plant operators in MISO are understating their ability to ramp up and down quickly, as noted by NRDC policy analyst Dana Ammann and other experts.  

“There’s so little incentive to ramp up quickly, because the market really accommodates their inflexibility,” said Ammann, lead author of the recent NRDC study. The vertically-integrated coal plants in MISO are “much less flexible than coal plants in other markets. In PJM you see coal plants turning on much more quickly, since the merchant plant operators are reliant on the price signals to turn a profit. They don’t have the guaranteed rate recovery, so they’re very responsive to price signals.” 

State utility commissions can prevent regulated utilities from recouping costs when coal plants are dispatched uneconomically. Michigan regulators did exactly this last year in a rate case for Indiana Michigan (I&M) Power, preventing the utility from passing on such costs for its share of the Rockport coal plant, located in Indiana.  

Daniel said Indiana regulators should likewise protect Indiana customers from paying for uneconomic power from the Rockport plant. The RMI dashboard shows that plant dispatched $142 million worth of such power last year. Meanwhile the Michigan ruling could be considered precedent for Michigan utilities like DTE and Consumers Energy in future rate cases. 

Ammann noted that states can also use the Integrated Resource Plan process to curb uneconomic dispatch, as Minnesota’s utility commission did when it recently decided that Otter Tail Power’s Coyote coal plant can only recoup costs during a designated power emergency.

“It’s an interesting approach for getting ratepayers basically off the hook for coal plants that aren’t retiring, that might still be economic to run for a small number of hours,” Ammann said. 

Grid operators like MISO may have the most important role to play in better managing markets, refusing to dispatch coal plants that aren’t necessary and doing deeper analysis to figure out exactly how much power is needed. Experts say multi-day markets – rather than just real-time and day-ahead ones – could better match supply with demand and avoid unnecessary coal plant dispatch. 

MISO’s Independent Market Monitor has recommended such measures, including de-committing coal power producers who sold into the day-ahead market if it turns out that others – including renewables – could sell power more efficiently in the real-time market once the time comes. 

“MISO works closely with our members, state regulators and our independent market monitor to ensure our markets are efficient,” said MISO spokesperson Brandon Morris. MISO’s June 2024 monthly operations report shows that in June, 18% of coal-fired power dispatched in the region was uneconomic self-committed dispatch. 

Experts note that fuel delivery contracts often include a minimum purchase, so utilities committed to buying a certain amount of fuel might as well burn the fuel even if they are not making a profit on the power. This might not have been an issue in years past when coal plants operated at high capacity most of the time, but as coal plants have become increasingly uncompetitive, the NRDC study notes, they are more likely to be committed to buy fuel they actually don’t need. Fuel contracts are usually of short duration, with 88% of those reviewed by the federal Energy Information Administration expiring by 2025, meaning there is ample opportunity for fuel delivery contracts to be revised, the NRDC study said. 

Such fuel contracts have meant massive stocks of unneeded coal piling up at Duke plants in Indiana, Inskeep said, forcing the company to burn it even if the power isn’t needed.

Protogere said the coal supplies are necessary, as “the goal is to ensure a reliable supply in an increasingly uncertain market. The aim is to manage volatility as well as maintain long-term supply reliability and security, so that we don’t have to resort to higher cost options in the market.”

Inskeep hopes state regulators deny requests by Duke and other utilities to increase coal-fired generation and the recouping of the costs from ratepayers. 

“The bottom line with this uneconomic dispatch situation is it means utilities are keeping their old expensive coal plants open longer than they should,” Inskeep said. “Utilities should be rapidly transitioning to a renewable energy-based portfolio of resources. Instead, utilities are feeling pressure to justify a lot of the bad economic decisions they’ve made in the past, foolish decisions to invest millions or even billions of dollars to keep these plants open.”

Indiana’s dependence on coal is costing ratepayers millions and holding back clean energy growth is an article from Energy News Network, a nonprofit news service covering the clean energy transition. If you would like to support us please make a donation.