Ford has given the Mustang Mach-E a light reshuffle for 2026, and one change jumps out immediately. The front trunk is no longer standard kit. If you want a frunk now, you will have to tick a box and pay for the privilege. And it’s a pretty expensive one at that.

First noticed by Ford Authority, the updated online configurator reveals that the frunk is now a $495 option across the entire model line-up. While there are plenty of EVs out there that don’t have a frunk at all, this is the first time we’ve heard of one being offered as an optional extra. It may also be the first instance of a once-standard frunk becoming a paid add-on.

Read: Mustang Mach-E Owners Will Need A Fix Before Nightfall Becomes A Problem

Ford says the decision was driven by customer behavior. Not many owners were using the frunk in the first place, or so the company claims. Removing it as standard helps cut costs, and the company insists those savings are being passed on.

To be fair, as we reported back in December, the Mach-E GT is almost $1,000 cheaper for 2026 than it was last year. The entry-level car, however, still starts at $37,795, which suggests the savings have not been distributed equally.

What Else Is Missing?

There are a few more trims to the lineup for 2026. For example, the front-seat map pockets have quietly disappeared, presumably in the name of saving a few pennies per car. The Mach-E Rally also parts ways with its standard rear spoiler and graphics, both now shuffled onto the options sheet. And if you were fond of the Bronze Appearance Package, it has been shown the door as well.

It is not all subtraction, though. Ford has made one practical addition at the back, fitting the rear doors with the same small grab handles used up front. You still have to press a button to pop the door open, because this is 2026, but at least there is now something physical to grab once it releases.

However, given how much bad press electronic door handles had over the past year, as well as regulatory changes in other markets, it’s possible Ford may eventually have to revert to more traditional door handles. We will see how long the current setup lasts.

California is known for its beach vibes, but the state’s climate offers a little bit of everything. That’s especially true in the mountain town of Truckee, which reportedly received more than 10 inches of snow in the past 24 hours.

While snow is a fact of life in the Sierra Nevadas, some people aren’t used to the cold conditions. That appears to include a Rivian R1S driver, who discovered how weather can impact range.

More: Louisiana Town Threatens Drivers Without AWD, Then Mocks The Backlash

On Facebook, the California Highway Patrol posted a short clip of an R1S that apparently ran out of juice in the middle of a snow covered intersection. Authorities didn’t say what happened, but the video was accompanied by a message saying “Cold weather drains batteries faster than you think. If you’re rolling over the Summit, make sure your charge level matches your confidence level.”

They also advised drivers to charge up, slow down, and carry snow chains. While that’s a good reminder, police appeared to mock EVs and the driver as the post was tagged #ItsElectric and #MakeGoodDecisions.

Last week, they joked about a Tesla driver who lost control and went down an embankment. In that post, they said “Chain control was lifted earlier this morning and some of you took that as a personal challenge to full send anyway.” It was accompanied by an assortment of tags including #MakeGoodDecisions, #DonnersGonnaDonner, and #SlowYourRoll.

This appears to be a common theme with the Truckee post, but the criticism isn’t limited to EV drivers. Some people seem to get a kick out of this as one popular comment was “My new winter goal is to not be featured on your social media page.”

A Rivian R1T owner has just learned the hard way that “touchless” does not mean “harmless.” Sure, these washes skip the spinning brushes, but that does not make them gentle. As it turns out, high-pressure water and moving hardware can still do a number on a six-figure electric pickup.

Posting on Reddit, the owner says he recently took his R1T through a touchless car wash for the first time when a black plastic panel at the rear of the EV’s roof suddenly popped off. That panel covers a fair bit of electronic gubbins, including the antenna, and is secured with clips and adhesive. Obviously, it is meant to stay put.

Read: That Rattle In Your Rivian Might Mean A Recall

Photos show several of those clips torn loose, with adhesive strips peeled back as if the truck had tried to shed its own roof trim. It would be easy to blame water pressure or the industrial-strength dryers at the end of the tunnel, but that does not appear to be what happened.

According to the owner, one of the wash’s spraying arms became lodged under the roof panel, apparently misjudging the height of the pickup. Instead of gliding past, it hooked underneath and pried the piece upward. Not exactly part of the premium wash package.

Image Reddit/mrwillya

Some commenters on the Reddit thread suggest that in order for Rivian to repair the rear roof panel, it’s possible that part of the interior will have to be removed to gain access to all of the wires positioned beneath the panel. Additionally, the third brake light of the R1T is positioned directly above the rear window near this panel, and may also need to be replaced.

Then there’s the matter of who will end up paying for the repairs. The owner says the car wash’s insurance will cover the costs, though that likely means a round of negotiations between insurers before any money changes hands. In the meantime, the damaged truck could spend weeks, possibly longer, waiting in a body shop bay for parts and repairs. So much for a quick rinse.

Modern vehicles may be packed with advanced engineering and clever design, but even a minor fender-bender can sometimes trigger catastrophic repair bills. If you own a Rivian R1S or R1T, you might want to keep your fingers crossed that one of the rear quarter panels is never damaged. If it is, repair costs can climb past $50,000, prompting some insurers to write off vehicles that, at least on paper, could be repaired.

An R1S owner recently took to Reddit to share the bill shock he experienced after someone hit his wife’s SUV while it was parked. A photo posted on the forum shows a large dent in the rear quarter panel, along with damage to the wheel and, as it turns out, the frame and suspension too.

Read: Paintless Dent Removal Magician Saved Rivian R1 Owner From $41k Bodyshop Invoice

In the grand scheme of things, the damage does not appear catastrophic. You might reasonably assume the repair would run a few thousand dollars. That assumption would be wrong.

An authorized Rivian repair facility quoted the owner $53,736 to fix this R1S, or more than half the MSRP of a 2026MY that in this configuration, retails for around $100,000. Of that sum, $29,856 is attributed to labor alone. Insurance would cover close to $40,000, leaving the owner responsible for a little over $14,000.

Why Does It Cost So Much?

It appears much of the cost is related to the complexity of replacing the quarter panel, as it can’t simply be removed and replaced with another. Previous cases of similar damage indicate that much of the SUV’s interior must be stripped and that most of the R1S’s side must be removed, cut, and reassembled. In some cases, it’s been reported that the panoramic glass roof may also have to be removed.

Things can be even costlier for owners of R1T models, as the rear-quarter panel is even larger and stretches up and over the side windows, ending at the A-pillars.

According to the owner, “replacing the quarter panel is the majority of that cost. No motor battery or frame damage”. Some commenters questioned the reference to frame damage because the repair quote specifically mentioned it in one line item. The owner, however, clarified that “the side of the vehicle is considered an integral part of the frame”.

He also explained that “suspension work was quoted as 13 total hours of labor vs. about 250 hrs total. So roughly thats 5% of the price”, adding that this was “one of the top Rivian certified shops in our area, who Rivian themselves recommended”.

Also: Can You Believe This Rivian R1T Damage Repair Cost $21,000?

Without a more detailed breakdown, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Still, this is hardly the first time we’ve seen excessively high Rivian repair costs, including a $21,000 estimate for what was described as a relatively minor backup incident.

A Pattern Of High Repair Bills

While this particular example appears to involve underlying damage, which may justify more extensive work, the total still sounds steep. In cases without structural or deeper damage, more affordable solutions do exist.

More: Rivian Owner’s DIY Repair Saves Thousands After Mishap And Teaches Us A Lesson

Many paintless dent removal specialists have repaired similar quarter panel damage for a fraction of the quoted insurance repair cost, restoring the panel rather than replacing it. Just pray that you don’t damage the taillight too.

Tesla has been hit with yet another lawsuit related to its electrically powered doors. Last week, the mother of a 20-year-old man who died following a collision in a 2021 Tesla Model Y filed a lawsuit against the automaker. The complaint was submitted to federal court in Massachusetts.

According to the filing, Samuel Tremblett was still alive after crashing his Model Y into a tree along Route 138 in Easton, a small town just south of Boston. He managed to dial 911 from inside the car, but a transcript of the call reveals he was unable to open the doors as fire began to engulf the car.

Trapped And Unable To Escape

“I’m stuck in a car crash,” Tremblett said on the call, no doubt in a frenzied state. “I can’t get out, please help me. I can’t breathe…It’s on fire…I’m going to die.”

Read: Families Claim Tesla Door Handles Trapped Teens In Burning Cybertruck

Emergency crews were dispatched to the scene, but they couldn’t extinguish the blaze fast enough to save the young man. According to local media, fire responders heard four explosions from the Model Y within the first 10 minutes at the scene. It took four hours before the inferno was put out.

The lawsuit states that Tremblett suffered “catastrophic thermal” injuries as well as smoke inhalation. His body was found in the back seat of the Model Y. According to the complaint, he was unable to open the doors after the crash and succumbed to the fire before help could reach him.

How Tesla Doors May Fail

The lawsuit claims that the electronic exterior door handles on the Tesla Model Y may fail to open during a crash, making it impossible to access the vehicle from outside. In addition, the suite says that the interior mechanical door release is not clearly marked and may be difficult to locate.

This is especially problematic in the rear, where the emergency release is hidden beneath a plastic panel in the door pocket. It’s a simple cable, and many Model Y owners and/or passengers may not even realize it’s there.

The lawsuit cites 17 incidents, going back to 2016, in which Tesla reportedly received complaints of both adults and children becoming trapped inside vehicles during thermal runaway events.

Growing Regulatory Pressure

A recent report from Bloomberg says that at least 15 people in the US have been killed in crashes involving Tesla vehicles where the doors couldn’t be opened. Concerns over the operation of these electronic door handles have recently prompted a ban in China, and it’s possible that other countries could follow suit.

In the US, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced in September that it is investigating potential defects in some Model Y vehicles. These cases involve incidents where the external door handles allegedly failed following collisions.

Meanwhile, a US lawmaker has proposed legislation that would require manual door releases in new vehicles and provide first responders with reliable access when power is lost.

The last year has been full of stories surrounding dangerous door handle design. Now, China is banning retractable handles, beginning with electric vehicles. A newly uncovered video highlights why. After a collision with a truck, one Dongfeng eπ007 turns into a full conflagration in less than a minute.

While the video went viral today, Dongfeng itself confirmed that the crash actually occurred in Wenshan, Yunnan province, on March 19, 2025.

In it, we see the Chinese electric sedan, which, notably, serves as the base for Nissan’s popular N7, spins and slides off the road before it hits some construction fencing. Nothing about the crash looks particularly devastating, but apparently, somewhere along the line, the battery ends up punctured.

Why Seconds Count

The driver pops out of the car immediately, but can’t open the rear door. The handles won’t extend out of the body of the door itself. Then, his door also shuts and no longer responds to similar attempts to open it. 29 seconds after the initial impact, smoke is billowing from the passenger side of the car, and all of the doors are shut.

More: China Officially Bans Pop-Out Door Handles, And The World May Follow

The driver begins trying to break the window with his elbow. Another individual runs up, and the pair uses rocks to break the side windows. Then, the real work begins as they pull two occupants from the car rather quickly. 52 seconds after the initial crash, flames are clearly visible on the outside of the car, and the cabin is completely filled with black smoke.

A Race Against Time and Fire

Despite the flames, the individual who popped up out of nowhere to help managed to pull the final passenger out of the fully on-fire car. The occupants all have remnants of the fire visible on their clothing and faces.

Read: Dongfeng eπ 007 EV Offers Lambo Doors And Up To 536 hp From Just $22,400

The rescuer later said all three passengers suffered burns, with the injuries described as serious but not life-threatening. He himself sustained severe burns to his hands, saying five fingers were still bandaged months later and that the injuries may prevent him from returning to work as a truck driver.

Company Responds

On February 5, Dongfeng’s eπ brand issued a statement confirming the crash occurred in March 2025 and expressing sympathy to all those involved. The company said its team went to the scene at the time and cooperated with authorities.

Read: Electric Door Handles Face Global Scrutiny After Deadly EV Crashes

According to Dongfeng, the fire was triggered after a high-speed collision with a truck. The automaker also warned that circulating clips may not reflect the full context of the crash and could cause further distress to those involved.

It’s also worth noting that, while some reports from China claimed a front-seat passenger died in the fire, this has not been confirmed.

If it wasn’t clear before why accessible, fully operable manual door handles are important, this incident should clear it up.

For a hypercar famous for hopping over potholes like a caffeinated kangaroo, the Yangwang U9 just had a very grounded moment. The Chinese electric hypercar was involved in a multi vehicle crash in Zhejiang, and this time its trick suspension could not spring it out of trouble.

According to reports shared on Chinese social media, the incident happened near an intersection while a Zeekr 009 electric MPV was stopped at a red light. The U9 reportedly struck the Zeekr at speed, then continued on to meet some roadside greenery and an advertising sign on the median.

More: BYD Drops Giant Palm Tree On $150K YangWang And It Drives Off Like Nothing Happened

A BYD Seagull also got caught up in the chain of impacts, according to Car News China, making this one unfortunate EV love-in. Thankfully, early accounts say no one in any of the vehicles suffered serious injuries, and there were no fatalities.

Images from the scene show heavy front-end damage to the U9, while the Zeekr 009 appears to have taken a serious hit as well, as one of its front wheels was reportedly detached.

One thing observers were quick to note was what did not happen. Despite the severity of the crash sequence, there were no reports of battery fires in any of the cars, including the U9. In a high-performance EV with a massive battery pack, that’s something to be thankful for.

Pointless Tricks

The Yangwang U9 made headlines this time last year when the BYD-owned brand released a video showing it leaping over small obstacles in the road. Using its trick Disus X suspension, the quad motor hypercar can clear potholes and spikes, dance, and drive on three wheels. But as this accident proves, some laws of physics can’t be cheated.

The regular U9 packs a 1,287-hp (1,305 PS / 960 kW) quad-motor powertrain, but last fall an appropriately-named limited edition U9 Extreme with an outrageous 2,978 hp (3,019 PS / 2,220 kW) achieved 308.4 mph (496.22 km/h).

Images BYD fans

💾

A dust-covered prototype spotted in a California parking lot has stirred plenty of curiosity across forums and social media. Weathered and left behind, it’s another eerie reminder of how unforgiving the EV game can be, especially for startups trying to find a foothold in a market that moves fast, burns money, and doesn’t wait for anyone to catch up.

More: Seres 5 Crushes Tesla Model Y In Comfort But Loses The Battle Where It Counts

The vehicle in question appears to be a near-production evolution of the SF7 concept, which SF Motors first revealed back in 2018. That company would later be rebranded as Seres, eventually spinning off the Aito nameplate in partnership with Chinese tech giant Huawei. And yes, keeping track can be a bit of a challenge.

Still, the Chinese automaker once had big plans for the North American market. In 2018, it purchased a factory in Mishawaka, Indiana, for $160 million, with the intention of building EVs on US soil and going straight after Tesla.

That same year, it also opened a 130,000-square-foot R&D and low-volume manufacturing facility at the McCarthy Creekside Industrial Center in Milpitas, California.

By the following year, however, those plans had been shelved. Officially, it was due to shifting market dynamics and the usual complications of US-China trade. Unofficially, the writing was already on the wall.

The Shape of What Could Have Been

The abandoned prototype, first noticed by forum users and Reddit sleuths, was spotted in the parking lot of the SF Motors facility in Milpitas, California. Compared to the original SF7 concept, this one looks much closer to production, with reworked bumpers, reshaped fenders, and more conventional lighting units.

Overall, it looks like a mix between a sedan and a fastback crossover, with discreet cladding around the wheel arches and a sleek roofline. It also features. US-market details like amber indicators suggest it was being prepped for local homologation.

Inside, there’s a large portrait-oriented infotainment display paired with a digital instrument cluster. The cabin is trimmed in white leather with wood accents, but it’s clearly suffered from exposure, thanks to windows left partially open to the elements.

Specs That Never Saw the Road

Originally, the SF7 was meant to ride on a dedicated EV platform, boasting quad electric motors with a combined output of up to 1,000 horsepower. A liquid-cooled battery was estimated to provide around 300 miles (483 kilometers) of range, putting the SF7 in direct competition with premium electric SUVs at the time.

Although the SF7 never made it to showrooms, the slightly smaller SF5 managed to find a second life. That concept evolved into the Seres 5, which we reviewed, and the Aito M5, developed through the Seres-Huawei partnership.

A Failed Dream

Seeing this derelict development vehicle in California is reminder of how close SF Motors came to offer vehicles in the US. But in the end, those plans never crossed the finish line.

The Mishawaka facility, originally chosen as the production site for the SF5 and SF7, once built the Mercedes R-Class. That likely explains the presence of the white R-Class, sitting on pallets next to the abandoned SF7.

The old Mercedes crossover carries SF Motors emblems and was repurposed as a development mule for a “high-performance electric powertrain.”

From One Collapse to Another

After SF Motors scrapped its US production plans, the Indiana facility was picked up by Electric Last Mile Solutions (ELMS), a startup that later filed for bankruptcy. Mullen Automotive stepped in and took ownership in 2022, but by late 2025, the company handed the plant over to the GEM Group to resolve outstanding legal liabilities.

Photos Reddit / Imgur / Google Maps

Electric vehicles come with some obvious perks, from impressive acceleration and near-silent driving to charging costs that are typically, though not always, lower than fueling up with gas. But there’s a flipside when things go wrong. Battery replacement isn’t just expensive, it can easily eclipse the value of the car itself.

Just ask the owner of this 2013 Tesla Model S, for example, now staring down a quote that’s far from reasonable.

Watch: Tesla Model S Cruises Past 430,000 Miles On Original Battery

This particular owner recently visited a Tesla service center in Madison, Wisconsin, to get estimates on a battery replacement. According to a post they shared on Reddit, they inquired about swapping out the existing 60 kWh pack for either the same model or a larger 90 kWh version. Both options came back with steep price tags that likely outstrip the resale value of the vehicle.

Battery Pricing Hits Hard

A replacement 60 kWh pack would cost $13,830. That includes $580.50 for labor, based on a 2.58-hour installation time. The rest, a hefty $13,250, covers just the battery itself. Not exactly light on the wallet for what is now Tesla’s smallest available battery on offer.

The price jumps significantly for the larger 90 kWh pack. The pack alone costs $18,000, with an additional $4,500 required to unlock its full capacity. Factor in installation and necessary replacement parts, and the total comes to $23,262.

That’s well beyond what most used Model S vehicles from the same year are currently worth. We found they typically range from $10,000 to $15,000, depending on trim and condition. From a financial standpoint, the upgrade cost doesn’t pencil out.

Reddit u/sirromnek

Reddit user u/sirromnek shared the experience, sparking discussion among other Tesla owners. While many have logged hundreds of thousands of miles on their original packs without issue, battery degradation isn’t unheard of. For some, the only path forward is a costly replacement.

While going directly to Tesla is an option, new batteries can also be purchased from third-party suppliers, often at a much lower price than Tesla offers. However, given that decade-old Tesla Model S sedans are barely fetching over $12,000, buying a replacement pack probably isn’t worth it.