The Charger Daytona EV came with big expectations, but soon proved to be a sales flop.
Things are so bad that dealers have been offering huge discounts since late last year.
Now Dodge is chiming in with a $6.5k rebate and awaits the ICE Sixpack and, possibly, V8.
Electric dreams don’t always go according to plan, especially when you’re trying to replace roaring V8s with silent speed. The transition from combustion powertrains to all-electric ones was supposed to be a one-way trip for automakers, the future most agreed was inevitable. But Dodge’s recent experience suggests the road ahead is a lot bumpier than expected.
In fact, the Charger Daytona, which abandoned the ICE powertrains of the previous-gen muscle car, has been underperforming both in tests and, more crucially, in sales.
The situation appears to be so bad that Dodge, which introduced the Charger Daytona EV at the end of last year, is now offering buyers a $6,500 National Retail Consumer Cash rebate, according to Cars Direct, which cites a bulletin sent to dealerships. That’s in stark contrast to what usually happens when a brand new sports car is launched, as dealers are more than eager to slap huge markups on them provided, of course, there is sufficient demand.
However, fans haven’t warmed up to the EV at all, as they still miss the Hemi V8, leaving Dodge with a serious problem on its hands. That challenge is further complicated by reports that the ICE-powered Sixpack could be delayed, as Stellantis has idled the Windsor plant, where it’s set to be built, in response to Trump’s 25% import tariffs.
Even if the Sixpack is launched on time and gets well received by buyers, Dodge still has to sell the electric Daytona as well. Apparently, that’s easier said than done, and its dealers know it all too well as they’ve been offering much bigger discounts on their own way before the brand announced its $6.5k rebate.
This started in December 2024, but only last month, we found a 2025 Charger Daytona R/T on sale for $39,945. Since this car stickers at $62,685, that’s a discount of $22,740 – and it’s not the largest we’ve seen. In fact, another example that originally retailed for $61,590 was being offered for $36,932, which is $24,658 below MSRP.
Beyond the lack of emotional connection, there’s the price tag. The Daytona’s pricing strategy follows the same playbook Dodge used with the Challenger, where upper trims stretched into premium territory. But with the new Charger, the starting price has jumped to $59,595 for the R/T and $73,985 for the Scat Pack. Some well-optioned examples are approaching, or even surpassing, the $100,000 mark in terms of MSRP.
At that point, the Daytona isn’t just competing with muscle cars, it’s going head-to-head with more refined and tested performance rides. The Ford Mustang GT starts at $46,560. A BMW 440i Coupe runs about $65K. Even the M4, a benchmark in the segment, starts at $80K. It’s hard to imagine what Stellantis was thinking pricing the Daytona this far north, especially with electric performance still a tough sell.
Can A Hemi Save The Day?
So what can Dodge do? The new platform wasn’t built for a V8, but Stellantis might not have a choice. Recent reports suggest the company is already exploring ways to cram a Hemi into the new Charger’s engine bay, possibly as soon as 2026. Whether that move comes in time to save the brand’s muscle legacy is another question entirely. Here’s hoping it’s not too late.
Lexus is preparing an all-electric three-row SUV based on its 2021 Electrified concept design.
The new Lexus TZ may share parts with the RZ to reduce production and development costs.
Lexus filed TZ450e and TZ550e trademarks suggesting at least two variants in development.
Lexus isn’t exactly known for rushing into things, but when it moves, it tends to do so with quiet confidence. Now, it looks like the Lexus family is set to expand once again with the addition of a new all-electric three-row SUV. We’re getting an early sense of what it might look like, and it’s shaping up to be an interesting electric counterpart to the brand’s existing offerings.
The new model, likely to be called the TZ, will share its underpinnings with a Toyota-branded sibling known as the bZ5X. It’s expected to fill the role of a three-row alternative to the gas-powered Lexus TX, stepping into a space that’s growing fast in the EV market, where size, range, and badge cachet all matter.
To show how this new model may look, designer Theophilus Chin, also known as Theottle, has taken the Lexus Electrified SUV concept unveiled back in 2021 and made some production adjustments to it. While we won’t know how the TZ looks until Lexus starts testing some prototypes out in public, it would make sense for the brand to base it heavily on this concept.
A Familiar Face With Slight Tweaks
At the front, Theottle’s rendering swaps out the concept’s dramatic headlights for more conventional units, ones more in line with the current Lexus design language. The lighting elements below them, along with the shape of the front bumper, remain untouched, suggesting Lexus might not stray too far from its conceptual roots.
Moving along the sides, a few practical changes appear. The flush door handles of the concept are gone and have been replaced with more traditional hardware. A new set of wheels has also been added, and normal wing mirrors have been installed. It’s all standard production-car stuff, but necessary if this thing is going to hit a dealership lot.
The most obvious change made to the rear of the TZ is the fitment of smaller taillights that do not stretch as far down the rear quarter panels. Despite this, we think the rear of the new three-row Lexus still looks a little busy, and we hope Lexus’s designers come up with something more attractive than this.
Little is known about the production model, but in 2023, Lexus applied to trademark the TZ450e and TZ550e names, indicating that at least two electric models are being prepared. Lexus could use the same 77 kWh battery offered in the new RZ, but given the size and expected weight of this three-row SUV, it seems likely the TZ550e will need a pack with increased capacity. For comparison, the Kia EV9, one of the few EVs in this segment already on sale, offers a choice between 76.1 kWh and 99.8 kWh battery packs.
Talking about the RZ, the entry-level version is the RZ 350e that features a single electric motor at the front axle with 224 hp (167 kW) and 198 lb-ft (269 Nm) of torque and has a 357-mile (575 km) range. The RZ 500e packs two electric motors that deliver 375 hp (280 kW) for a 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) time of 4.6 seconds and has a lower estimated range of 311 miles (500 km).
For the 2026 model year, Lexus added the RZ 550e F Sport to the lineup. It produces 402 hp (300 kW) from its dual-motor setup and accelerates to 100 km/h (96 mph) in 4.4 seconds. That added performance, however, comes at a cost as range drops to 280 miles (450 km). Since the TZ will be larger and heavier than the RZ, to quote Jaws‘ most iconic line, Lexus is gonna need a bigger boat – em, I mean battery.
Despite all the press it got and its initial success, the Cybertruck’s sales have trailed off.
In January, Tesla reportedly reassigned workers from the truck’s line to that of the Model Y.
Meanwhile, Musk is hyping up the Optimus robot, claiming that he’ll build millions each year.
Here are three things you probably already know but, in light of what will follow, are worth repeating. First, Tesla is not your average car company. Second, the Cybertruck is as far removed from your average truck as can be. And third, Elon Musk is definitely not your average CEO, seems to have an opinion about everything, and makes sure that it’s heard. Loud and clear.
Tesla’s success story and how it managed to disrupt the automotive industry has been told so many times that we won’t bore you with it. The Cybertruck, though, is worth exploring because it’s a relatively new product and was touted as the truck to end all trucks, electric or not. So, did it?
When it comes to publicity, the answer is a resounding “yes”. Hardly a day goes by without a story (or five) involving Tesla’s angular pickup truck, whether it be how ugly divisive its looks are, how its frame snaps in a YouTuber’s test while an old Ram’s doesn’t, the time a terrorist chose one to detonate an explosive device outside a Trump Hotel, and so on and so forth.
The Hype Is Still On, But Sales Are Falling
But first, let’s take a small trip down memory lane to October 2023. A month before the Cybertruck’s launch, Musk boasted that Tesla had already received “over 1 million reservations” and demand for the unconventional truck was “off the charts”. Of course, you could make a reservation for a refundable $100 (later raised to $250) deposit, but that was a minor detail…
Naturally, no one, not even Musk himself, expected all those reservations to translate into actual orders. In fact, Stephanie Valdez Streaty, director of industry insights for Cox Automotive, told Wiredthat “The automotive industry aims for a conversion rate of around 2 to 16 percent”. Since a couple of weeks ago Tesla revealed, as part of a recall campaign, that it has delivered 46,096 Cybertrucks from November 13, 2023, to February 27, 2025, it represents a conversion rate of less than 5 percent. That’s within the aforementioned range, but not exactly music to Musk’s, or Tesla fanboys’, ears.
While nobody would dare accuse the world’s richest man of making misleading statements (except, maybe, the “crooked” SEC), 46,000 sales do not indicate that demand is “off the charts”. Granted, initially it was the new shiny toy everyone who’s someone had to have, and in the first half of 2024 the Cybertruck was America’s sales leader in the six-figure-priced car club. However, compared to the sub-$100k one, which is most carmakers’ that aren’t called Ferrari, Bentley, Aston Martin or Lamborghini, bread and butter, it’s quite an exclusive club, wouldn’t you agree?
Model Y Production Is Prioritized Over That Of The Cybertruck
In early January, Business Insider reported that, according to its sources, declining sales led to Tesla moving some of its workers in the Austin plant from the Cybertruck to the Model Y production line. The company told its workers in a survey where it asked them about their reassignments that “As we continue to assess schedules to meet business needs, we’ll be making a change to Model Y and Cyber schedules and we want to ensure that your preferences are considered”.
Two workers said that this was an unusual move as such changes are only implemented for new vehicles. Then again, maybe the brand considers the Model Y Juniper an all-new model, so this was justified. After all, the Model Y is Tesla’s bread and butter product – and an extremely successful one, at least until last year when sales dropped sharply. But that was natural as everyone knew the updated Juniper was soon coming our way, so they probably decided to wait a few months rather than buy the “old” model.
Forget Tesla And Sales, Let’s Talk About Robots Instead
As we’ve come to expect, though, the really hot stuff usually comes not from the company or its products, but from its head honcho who’s not afraid to speak his mind – and then some – at any given opportunity. Never mind the Cybertruck’s performance or Tesla’s rapidly declining sales; at a staff meeting on March 20, Musk focused on a non-automotive product: Optimus.
“This year, we hopefully will be able to make about 5,000 Optimus robots,” he declared. “That’s the size of a Roman legion. Which is like a scary thought. Like a whole legion of robots. I’ll be like, ‘whoa.’” Then he upped that target by stating that Tesla will make “probably 50,000-ish [Optimus robots] next year” (so, 10 legions), and subsequently corrected himself, saying that his company would actually make “maybe 100 million robots a year”.
Veni, Vidi, Vici – And Then, What?
Now, I don’t care to do the math, I don’t know whether Musk’s promises will turn out to be true (though he does have a less that perfect track record on that) and, last time I checked, I don’t have an BA in History. I’m no gambler either, but I’m willing to bet not even Julius Caesar had that many legions at his disposal when he crossed the Rubicon to march towards Rome.
After emerging victorious in the ensuing civil war, he was declared dictator perpetuo – that’s “dictator for life” in Latin – in January, 44 BC. Little did the great general know how short-lived that title would turn out to be; he was assassinated two months later, in March.
Well, the only sure thing is life is death (and taxes…), so it all boils down on how you wanna be remembered. Julius Ceasar, apart from his conquests, is also famous about his one-liners – even the one uttered while he was being stabbed to death (“You as well, Brutus?”). I believe Elon Musk will also go down in history, though I can’t predict for what. Perhaps you care to speculate in the comments?
ADAC found EVs break down less often than combustion cars, even with more EVs on the road.
Surprisingly, battery issues are the leading cause of breakdowns for both EVs and ICE cars.
Tires are the only category where electric car face more breakdowns than combustion vehicles.
The electric-versus-combustion debate isn’t just about performance or emissions anymore—it’s also about dependability. And according to Europe’s largest roadside assistance organization, the German Automobile Club (ADAC), electric cars might be quietly winning that fight.
Its workers, sometimes known as “Yellow Angels” thanks to their bright uniforms, responded to more than 3.6 million breakdowns over the last year making this study. They recorded the details of each call, and that mountain of data shows that electric vehicles are breaking down less often than internal combustion cars.
EVs Show Fewer Breakdowns
For the first time in 2024, the ADAC said it had enough data to make a confident call on EV reliability, and that call favors electric. With another year of data behind them, the case has only grown stronger. While it responded to more EV calls for service than ever before, those accounted for just 43,678 out of the 3.6 million total or just 1.2%.
The organization pointed out in its recent study that the rise is likely due to the increased popularity of electric vehicles. In addition, the results should be more accurate since some of the EVs on the road are a year older now.
Crucially, 2024 marked the first year ADAC felt it had enough data to confidently say EVs were more reliable. With another year of records, that finding looks even stronger. “For cars first registered between 2020 and 2022, electric vehicles experienced 4.2 breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles,” German outlet Handelsblatt reports. For combustion cars in the same age range, that figure was 10.4.
Common Weak Spot For ICE and EVs
Interestingly, the most common issue for both types of propulsion was the same: the 12-volt batteries. They were the issue in 50 percent of the breakdowns for EVs and 45 percent of the breakdowns for combustion cars. In almost every single category over the last few years, combustion cars have seen more or equal issues when compared to EVs, including the electrical system, engine management, and lighting.
The one area where EVs seem to have more problems is when it comes to tires. Specifically, 1.3 calls for service out of 1000 were due to an EV with tire issues, while combustion cars saw just 0.9 in the same population. It’s worth pointing out that newer EVs do not seem to suffer from the same problem.
Of course, EVs are also devoid of potential ICE issues regardless of age. They don’t have oil to replace, nor the complex propulsion system that an internal combustion engine is, and as a result, they have fewer pieces that can break.
The ADAC acknowledges the challenges with comparing EVs and ICE cars at this point. The data is limited since all-electric vehicles just haven’t been around all that long, thus we can’t know just yet how reliable they’ll all be after they’re 10+ years old. Still, this is a good indication that EVs are improving and could indeed be a more practical mode of transportation, even when we ignore their effect on sustainability. For more detailed information.
Almost 300,000 EVs were sold in the United States during the first three months.
Porsche, Toyota, VW, Volvo, and GMC increased their sales in Q1 significantly.
Tesla sales dropped by 9%, but it still retains a 43.5% share of the EV market.
Electric vehicle sales in the United States are gaining ground, but the road to mainstream dominance is still a long one. While EVs made a notable leap forward in the first quarter of 2025, they continue to account for only a fraction of total new car sales. Some automakers rode a wave of growth with new models and fresh demand, while others—Tesla included—faced early-year setbacks.
In total, 296,227 electric vehicles were sold nationwide between January and March, marking an 11.4 percent increase over the 265,981 units delivered during the same period last year. New data shows that General Motors had a particularly strong showing, with more than 30,000 GM EVs finding buyers in Q1—nearly doubling its output from a year ago. A mix of fresh offerings from Chevrolet and GMC helped drive the gains, while Cadillac continued to post steady performance.
GM Surges with Chevrolet and GMC
Chevrolet alone sold 19,186 electric vehicles in Q1 2025, a 114.2% increase over the 8,957 units it moved in the same quarter last year. The big success story was the Equinox EV, which led the brand’s lineup with 10,329 sales. The Blazer EV followed with a staggering 931.2% increase—rising from just 600 units in Q1 2024 to 6,187 units. The Silverado EV also posted a strong debut with 2,383 deliveries. Meanwhile, the Bolt EV and EUV were essentially absent, with only 13 units sold after GM officially discontinued the models two months ago.
GMC contributed solid numbers as well. The Hummer EV pickup and SUV posted a combined 3,479 sales, up 108.6%, while the brand also moved 1,249 units of the new Sierra EV.
According to Cox Auto, Porsche recorded the highest EV growth rate of any brand, with sales up 249% thanks to the arrival of the new Macan Electric. Toyota’s EV sales climbed 195.7% to 5,610 units, the Volkswagen Group jumped 183%, and Volvo spiked 172.9% on the strength of the new EX30 and EX90 models.
Tesla by contrast, didn’t share in the early-year enthusiasm. The company saw its US sales drop 9% year-over-year, delivering 128,100 vehicles in Q1. Still, even with the decline, Tesla holds a commanding 43.5% share of the U.S. EV market—nearly half of all electric cars sold.
Several other automakers also saw declines. Mercedes-Benz posted the steepest drops, down a staggering 58%. Rivian followed with a 37% dip, and Kia slipped 24% compared to the same quarter last year.
Looking ahead, Cox Automotive expects the rest of the year to be anything but smooth. “The rest of 2025 will likely be a volatile one for EV sales in the U.S., despite the introduction of new product and healthy incentives,” the firm noted. Tariff-related headwinds could weigh heavily, particularly for automakers relying on imported materials. Steel and aluminum tariffs are already a hurdle, and with China supplying much of the world’s EV battery materials, the ongoing trade standoff may distort the market further.
The rear end of BMW’s Vision Driving Experience concept has received widespread criticism online.
The EV concept features four electric motors, promising impressive performance but divisive styling.
Back in February, BMW pulled the curtain back on its all-electric Vision Driving Experience study, giving us a conceptual peek at what’s coming with the first M-branded Neu Klasse EV. The German brand’s design direction has faced its fair share of criticism in recent years, and while they’re trying to embrace a fresh new look, it seems not everyone is onboard with their latest vision.
Earlier this week, BMW published images of the Vision Driving Experience on its Instagram page, and the reception has not been all positive. A look through the comments shows that people have taken particular issue with the rear-end design of the EV, and we can’t blame them.
We think BMW has done a nice job with the front-end design of its Neue Klasse concepts, ditching the hideous kidney grilles found on several existing models in favor of slimmer grilles that are joined seamlessly with the sharp LED headlights. However, the rear is a different story.
While the front of the concept sits quite low, as a sports sedan should, the rear end is much more upright and sits far higher than it needs to. The taillights are also positioned at the very top of the tailgate and look out of place.
People haven’t held back in voicing their opinion. “What the hell is this rear view,” one comment with over 6,500 likes reads. “Y’all need to fire your designer,” a user says, while another with over 3,000 likes says, “Tf are those rear lights.”
One comment is a meme showing a large pile of excrement, while another says, “I will pay you a billion pounds not to make this.” A popular fitness influencer with 2.7 million followers also left a comment, saying “Front is smooth but what the *** is that rear.”
Since the piece went live, there have been a few positive comments sprinkled in, but they’re pretty much an afterthought, with likes numbering in the single digits. Safe to say, most people aren’t exactly lining up to praise this design.
So, what do you think – does BMW need to go back to the drawing board, or are we just nitpicking? In any case, at this point, the concept‘s rear end might be the least of the brand’s worries when it comes to public opinion.
Chinese EVs might be ready to take over the world, but the US is a different story.
Last year, Biden increased taxes from 25% to 100% to negate their price advantage.
Trump’s new tariffs worsen things, but in 2021, someone managed to bring in a Wuling.
The US and China have been at loggerheads for quite some time and their rivalry seems to be intensifying with each passing day. One could describe it as a 21st Century version of the US vs. USSR situation – a Cold War 2.0 if you like, with China replacing the country that used to be known as the Soviet Union when the latter collapsed almost overnight in the early 1990s. Well, one always needs an big, scary enemy to galvanize their citizens and keep their military and industrial complex busy, right?
One of the most hardly fought fronts in this undeclared war is that of the automotive industry. See, China used to be a lot like the Soviet Union, seen by Westerners as monolithic and stuck in the past, its people allowed no freedom whatsoever. Most of them didn’t even have cars, for crying out loud, and those that did were forced to make do with sub-par, by our standards, locally-made ones. Oh, how the tables have turned.
The US Has A “National Security” Problem
Nowadays, it’s the rest of the world that’s afraid at the thought of a Chinese invasion; only it won’t be by armored divisions, fighter squadrons and aircraft carriers, but something much more benign that’s already in vogue in the West: electric cars. Not cheap European or American knock-offs, either, but ones with cutting edge technology, modern design, lots of built-in features and even performance that can rival whatever their competitors throw at them. And all that at a much more affordable price, too.
No wonder the US is actively prohibiting them from being imported in the country on the grounds of protecting national security.
It’s not something that started with Donald Trump, either, despite the 47th President being extremely vocal about putting an end to China’s advancements. The former occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in D.C., Joe Biden, was the one who increased the tariffs on Chinese cars from 25 to 100 percent in 2024, while he banned tech giant Huawei from the States by evoking (you guessed it) national security concerns.
Excluding Chinese-made cars from brands like Volvo, Polestar and Ford, no cars from the Peoples’ Republic are allowed to be sold in the US, whereas GM and Ford have been doing business in China for many years and even build market-specific models that cater to local buyers’ preferences.
One Man’s Quest to Get His Hands on GM’s Wuling Macaron
Which brings us to John Karlin, a guy who might or might not have had all of this in mind when he read an article in 2021 about GM China’s Wuling Hongguang Mini EV outselling the Tesla Model 3 in China. “I saw an article saying the most popular EV in the world is the Hongguang Mini EV, but you can’t have one. So that got me asking: Well, why is it the most popular vehicle? And why can’t I have one?,” he told Wired.
Eager to know what all the fuss was about, he went on and ordered a Wuling Macaron, a fancier version of the Mini EV, that he was determined to make his daily despite car imports from China being officially forbidden.
Undeterred, he bought one and started looking for a way to bring the EV on American soil legally. Buying it though was the easy part, and it cost him less than $8,000. Importing, registering and driving it on US roads proved to be the real challenge. By October Karlin, a registered nurse and quality process analyst, was driving from Oklahoma City to Freeport, Texas, to pick it up. Which, naturally, begs the question: how did he do it?
A Legal Loophole and an Ingenious Workaround
Karlin’s first roadblock was the 25-year law that allows cars of that vintage or older to be imported without going through the federal certification process. Problem: China wasn’t exactly making EVs that long ago. Grey, or parallel, imports, which thrive in other countries like the UK, where many Japanese icons have been imported over the years, was also not an option.
Congress made sure of that in 1988 when it outlawed them in order to protect US-made cars from the invasion of the Europeans and the Japanese that was happening at the time. Not that it eventually did domestic makers much good anyway.
Nevertheless, Karlin did have another recourse. As he told Wired, he discovered that certain states, including Oklahoma, have their own set of safety regulations for low- and medium-speed vehicles that aren’t allowed on highways. These are supposed to be street-legal golf carts or farm vehicles, but the diminutive Wuling Macaron fitted that description too.
The only thing he had to do in order to register it was to limit the EV’s top speed to 35 mph, proving that it wouldn’t go on a highway. While for many that would be a serious deterrent, Karlin mused that since he would only drive it to get to work or go grocery shopping, top speed wasn’t an issue anyway.
With that out of the way, the Macaron was registered, with Karlin thought be the first individual who brought such a car in the US. All in, it cost him around $13,000, which is 50 percent more than the sub-8k original price, but still cheaper than any other EV in the market, and it did the job quite nicely.
A Sweet Victory, But For How Long?
Karlin enjoyed the tiny Chinese EV for 12 months. Even though the state of Oklahoma re-audited his paperwork (he passed with flying colors) and he was followed by the police (but never pulled over), he was compelled to say goodbye when an unnamed US company offered to buy it from him in order to conduct research.
In fact, the company’s CEO visited him personally in Oklahoma City and sat in the car. Karlin admitted to Wired that he could “see the wheels turning in his head as he’s realizing this and that, and looking at these different features and materials”.
Today, with Biden’s 100 percent tax being compounded by Trump imposing a 20 percent levy on Chinese cars at first, and recently a 25 percent tariff on all imports, the cost would be significantly higher than it was in 2021, so going to all that trouble to bring in the Wulling probably wouldn’t make sense. But, at the time, it was a win for an individual fighting a government preventing him from getting his wish, and he did it all by the book, not by resorting to shady practices. We bet he feels going to all that trouble was well-deserved.
PROS ›› Comfortable ride, impressive power, high-quality interior CONS ›› No Android Auto/Apple CarPlay, limited physical controls, small boot
Europeans are notoriously loyal to their automotive brands, especially when it comes to premium options. However, that hasn’t stopped Seres, a fresh-faced Chinese automaker, from dipping its toes into the European market with a fully electric SUV. We recently spent a week behind the wheel of the Seres 5 to see what it has to offer prospective buyers.
The Seres 5 made its European debut in 2023, with a slow rollout across the continent through 2024. The model mirrors the design of the Chinese version that has been around since 2019, albeit with a slightly longer body. In 2022, Seres teamed up with Huawei to launch the Aito M5, a revamped version, but the global-spec Seres 5 we tested hasn’t yet gotten the same redesign.
Seres, formerly known as SF Motors, may be rooted in China, but it has a Silicon Valley presence and once had grand ambitions of selling cars in the U.S. These plans, however, appear to have been quietly shelved as the company shifts its focus to Europe, South America, and the Middle East.
QUICK FACTS
› Model:
2025 Seres 5
› Price:
€57,500 ($62,800) including local EV subsidies
› Dimensions:
Length: 185.4 inches (4,710 mm)
Width: 76 inches (1,930 mm)
Height: 63.8 inches (1,620 mm)
Wheelbase: 113.2 inches (2,875 mm)
› Curb Weight:
5,203 lbs (2,360 kg)*
› Powertrain:
Dual Electric Motors (AWD)
› Output:
577 hp (430 kW / 585 PS) and 940 Nm (693 lb-ft)
› 0-62 mph (0-100 km/h):
4.2 seconds*
› Battery:
80 kWh
› Range:
483 km / 300 miles (WLTP)
› On Sale:
China, Europe, Middle East, South America
*Manufacturer
SWIPE
Smooth and Curvy Lines
Unlike many new Chinese car brands that lean heavily on copying their established competitors (we’re looking at you, other automakers), Seres has made an attempt to bring something new to the table. Sure, eagle-eyed car nerds might spot a few design cues reminiscent of other cars—like the DS-style curvy daytime running lights or a subtle nod to the Porsche Macan in the rear end—but for the most part, the Seres 5 stands on its own.
The standout feature of the aerodynamic bodywork is the leaf-shaped greenhouse, highlighted by chrome accents. The EV’s silhouette blurs the lines between traditional and coupe-style SUVs, emphasizing the sculpted rear shoulders. The standard 21-inch alloy wheels, paired with red brake calipers, set a sporty tone, reinforcing that the Seres 5 is more of a GT crossover than an adventurous SUV.
During my time behind the wheel of the Seres 5, I noticed it attracted more attention than your average EV, turning plenty of heads—though that might also be because it’s a fresh new offering sparking curiosity. However, despite its recent arrival in Europe, the design is starting to feel outdated compared to newer competitors.
With a length of 4,710 mm (185 inches), the Seres 5 is a direct competitor to the Tesla Model Y, although the brand would prefer to position it against similarly-sized premium SUVs such as the BMW iX3, Mercedes GLC, and Audi Q6 E-tron.
The Cabin Is A Nice Place To Be
Step inside and you’re greeted by premium materials including the Nappa leather upholstery and the wood inserts. The perceived quality and the fit and finish is better than you would expect from a new brand, even though it doesn’t reach the levels of high-end models from the likes of BMW and Genesis. The standard equipment is quite generous and includes a panoramic glass roof and comfortable seats with heating, ventilation, massage, and memory functions.
The floating center console is a nice touch, incorporating a proper gear lever, storage compartments, and two wireless charging pads with cooling. The centerpiece is a Tesla-like 15.6-inch touchscreen, which is home to all of the vehicle’s functions. While the infotainment system’s interface is fairly easy to use, it’s missing physical controls for key functions like A/C and drive modes—making it occasionally frustrating to navigate on the fly.
A more glaring omission is the lack of Android Auto or Apple CarPlay, meaning your smartphone can only connect via Bluetooth. Sure, there are buttons on the steering wheel for media and calls, but the ADAS stalk feels a bit like something from a previous generation.
The digital instrument cluster and head-up display give you all the essential info, but their graphics could use a refresh—they only change when you’re in the Race driving mode. On a positive note, the infotainment screen features sharp wallpapers and quirky widgets like “Take A Break” and “Camping Mode,” so at least you’ll have something to occupy your mind when the car is parked. Unfortunately, I was let down by the audio system—while the bass and volume are fine, the clarity just doesn’t live up to expectations.
Rear passengers are treated with the same level of quality as the ones in the front seats, having access to their own USB ports, climate vents, seat back net pockets, and a central armrest with cupholders and a storage cubby. Once you get past the weird shape of the rear doors, there is more than enough headroom for tall individuals. Rear legroom is adequate, but not as generous as in some other models in the category.
The boot space is where things get a little tight at 367 liters (13 cubic feet) in the five-seater configuration and an additional 67 liters (2.4 cubic feet) in the trunk. Then there’s the tailgate: to be honest, I spent several minutes trying to figure out how to open it. It turns out that the dedicated button is mounted on the rear windscreen wiper. Owners will know, but it’s not convenient having to explain this to every single one of your passengers when they want to put something at the back, although their reactions should be interesting.
Driving Impressions: An Electric Grand Tourer
Even after the first minutes of driving the Seres 5, I was impressed with the high levels of comfort, as the suspension smoothed out the bumps, cracks, and potholes of the roads. The chassis feels sturdy and the sound insulation is on par with premium rivals, making the cabin a sanctuary. here’s just one small issue: the faint hiss from the electric motor at low speeds, which, while minor, is noticeable if you’re paying attention.
Despite the intimidating figures which would put any ’90s supercar to shame, the Seres 5 proved to be friendly behind the wheel. This is especially evident in Eco mode, which prioritizes efficiency over performance. Comfort mode gives access to more grunt and is perfect for daily use, while Sport and Race unleash the full 577 hp (430 kW / 585 PS) and 940 Nm (693 lb-ft) of torque.
Even in the sportiest settings, the Seres 5 remains composed, offering smooth power delivery and minimal wheel spin when you floor it from a standstill. Acceleration is impressive, especially when you’re cruising between 60-140 km/h (37-87 mph), making highway overtakes feel effortless. This is where the Seres 5 excels as a long-distance cruiser.
The steering is notably light by default, making it ideal for city driving, but less suited for spirited handling. Luckily, there’s a setting that adds weight to the steering, though it requires disabling some lane-keeping ADAS features first, and it still feels artificial. Overall, while the Seres 5 packs plenty of power and the suspension manages its weight well, it’s clear that this vehicle wasn’t built for chasing hot hatches on winding roads.
Range And Charging
In terms of range, you can expect about 400 km (250 miles) from the 80 kWh lithium iron phosphate battery pack if you’re driving sensibly. The most efficient drivers might push closer to the WLTP estimate of 483 km (300 miles), but it’s tough to hold back when 577 hp is tempting you with every press of the accelerator. That said, the Seres 5’s range is comparable to the outgoing Tesla Model Y Performance, which was rated for 280 miles in the US, though most real-world drivers saw closer to 240-260 miles.
The battery can charge from 30% to 80% in 25 minutes using a 100 kW DC charger. While that’s decent, it’s not as fast as some rival EVs from the Hyundai Group or other Chinese automakers. It’s also worth noting that while the BEV is the only option available in Europe, buyers in China have the option of a range-extender powertrain, which is better suited for hypermiling.
Pricing And Rivals
Unlike other Chinese automakers like BYD, which target price-conscious buyers, Seres has positioned its only EV offering closer to European pricing. In Greece, where we tested it, the Seres 5 is priced at €57,500 (equal to $62,500) with local EV subsidies. In Germany, where availability is more limited, the price jumps to €64,990 ($70,700). These figures apply to the full-spec AWD trim, which is currently the only option available in Europe.
As is typical with a new brand like Seres, depreciation is something potential buyers should keep in mind. Used 2024 models with very low mileage can already be found for as little as €40,000 ($43,700)—not great for the original owners, but a pretty sweet deal for anyone looking for a one-year-old EV with plenty of performance.
When it comes to competition, the Seres 5 faces stiff challenges. The Tesla Model Y, for example, offers a comparable AWD Long Range trim starting at €43,990 ($47,900) in Greece. The facelifted Kia EV6 GT AWD is also a solid contender at €56,990 ($62,000).
There are a few premium offerings in the same price range, but they tend to be less powerful in their base configurations. For example, the outgoing BMW iX3 (not offered in the US) starts at €52,950 ($57,600) here in Greece, the Lexus RZ450e is priced at €58,700 ($63,900), and the newer Audi Q6 E-tron kicks off at a considerably higher €67,980 ($73,900). It will be interesting to see how the prices of the upcoming BMW iX3 Neue Klasse and the fully electric successor to the Mercedes-Benz GLC compare.
Verdict
The all-electric Seres 5 offers a comfortable ride, plenty of power, and the kind of premium feel you’d expect from a more established brand. Despite being a newcomer, it has a distinctive design and a high-quality interior, packed with standard features. However, it does fall short in a few key areas, including the lack of modern connectivity options (though this could potentially be addressed with a future update), the absence of physical controls for essential functions, and some design elements that feel a bit dated.
The biggest hurdle for the Seres 5, however, is the intense competition it faces from well-established brands that already have loyal customer bases. On top of that, it lacks both the brand prestige of its European and Japanese rivals and the price advantage typically associated with Chinese models—one of the main selling points for many buyers.
If Seres can manage to lower the price, it might be worth considering introducing the Chinese-market range-extender version of the 5 in Europe, which could give the car a much-needed edge.
This years’s new Skoda’s seven-seat electric SUV has been spied testing.
EV alternative to ICE-powered Kodiaq is based on the Vision 7S concept.
Range of other MEB EVs drops below 140 miles when towing, tests show.
Skoda began teasing its new three-row electric SUV last month, which means a debut is probably imminent. But while the marketing team is stirring up some excitement, the Czech company’s engineers are making sure future owners don’t get a dose of the wrong kind of excitement when towing a large trailer.
SUVs are popular for their high driving position and generous interior space, but many owners buy traditional ICE-powered utilities because even those without body-on-frame construction can make for useful towing vehicles. And if automakers want to present EVs as serious alternatives to combustion vehicles, they need to be be able to haul trailers, boats and caravans, too.
The Towing Potential of EVs
In some ways, EVs make great tow vehicles. They’ve got tons of low end torque, the power delivery is smooth, and brake regeneration can prevent the conventional brakes from ever becoming overloaded. But because they are heavy, their towing capacity is usually lower than that of an equivalent ICE machine.
This new Skoda SUV, a production version of 2022’s Vision 7S concept which could be called the Space, is an electric alternative to the seven-seat combustion-powered Kodiaq. The Kodiaq is built on VW’s MQB Evo platform and in all-wheel drive vRS guise has a maximum towing capacity of 2,500 kg (5,510 lbs). But its electric counterpart rides on the MEB platform, the same one used by the Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.Buzz, and neither of those EVs can legally haul as big a load.
ICE Beats EV For Towing
The dual-motor Enyaq tops out at 1,200 kg (2,650 lbs) for a braked trailer, and Europe’s dual-motor Buzz can tow 1,800 kg (3,970 lbs) when fitted with the smaller 79 kWh battery, or only 1,600 kg (3,530 lbs) with the 86 kWh pack. But one of the Skoda’s key rivals could be Kia’s EV9, and that is rated at an impressive 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs).
In reality, if Skoda’s big EV can pull 1800 kg, that might be enough for many buyers not looking to drag huge boats, caravans and car trailers around. However, they’ll have to accept a sizeable drop in driving range when they’re hooked-up.
Many owners of MEB-platform EVs, including the VW ID.4 and Buzz, have documented their experience with towing in online forums, and according to their results, it’s not unusual to see a 50-60 percent reduction in range when pulling even an 820 kg (1,800 lb) trailer.
A 150-Mile Range?
Skoda claims a maximum range of 334 WLTP miles (537 km) for the AWD Enyaq in optimum weather conditions and when not towing, and the bigger seven-seater in these spy pics could be good for 370 miles (596 km) if it matches the claims for the 7S concept, which had an 89 kWh battery. But you could still be looking at a tow range of less than 150 miles (240 km) unless you keep the speed way down.
Sure, ICE-powered SUVs also take a big mpg and range hit when towing (though usually less than 50 percent), but they don’t have to worry about where to charge, or deal with the fact that unlike petrol stations, charging ones are generally not set up to deal with vehicles towing something behind them. So, would you buy an EV if you knew you wanted to tow things?
GM is temporarily halting BrightDrop 400 and 600 production at CAMI Assembly in Canada.
The slow-selling vans have been piling up, so workers are being laid off starting next week.
Following some off and on again production, the plant will be cut to a single shift in October.
GM had high hopes for their BrightDrop brand, but that enthusiasm waned and the vans were rolled into the Chevrolet lineup. While that move was designed to boost sales and availability, it hasn’t helped much as hundreds of unwanted vans have been piling up.
Given the growing inventories, it’s no surprise that the company is temporarily halting production at CAMI Assembly in Ingersoll, Ontario. The Canadian plant started BrightDrop production in late 2022 and employs more than 1,200 people.
Temporary Layoffs and Production Shifts
According to Unifor, GM will initiate temporary layoffs on April 14 and then bring workers back for limited production in May. Production will then end again to allow for retooling for assembly of the 2026 model.
When production resumes in October, the plant will be dropped down to a single shift for the foreseeable future. The union says this will result in the “indefinite layoff of nearly 500 workers.”
Unifor National President Lana Payne described the moves as a “crushing blow” and called on the automaker to “do everything in its power to mitigate job loss during this downturn.” She also called on the government to step up and support Canadian auto workers as well as Canadian-made products.
Payne was particularly adamant about the latter as she pitched the 400 and 600 vans as a “smart choice for Canadian business, government agencies, and for our economy.” That’s a not so subtle hint that she wants the government to buy some of the electric delivery vans.
While BrightDrop’s struggles are far from new, Payne used the opportunity to attack the Trump administration. She accused the United States of creating “industry turmoil” and said “Trump’s short-sighted tariffs and rejection of EV technology is disrupting investment and freezing future order projections.” She went on to claim this is “creating an opening for China and other foreign automakers to dominate the global EV market.”
Pricing Dilemma
As for the vans themselves, BrightDrop’s offerings start at $77,900, providing up to 614.7 cubic feet (17,406 liters) of cargo space and a combined range of up to 272 miles (438 km).
However, rival electric vans are far cheaper as the Ford E-Transit Cargo starts at $51,000 while the Mercedes eSprinter can be had for $61,180. That’s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, but it’s not hard to see why hundreds of BrightDrop vans are sitting on dealership lots.
Despite the problems, Unifor noted the company is committed to CAMI Assembly and the 2026 vans will be getting “upgrades.” What those are remain to be seen, but hopefully a smaller battery pack is on the way to reduce pricing.
The Verge TS Pro traveled 193 miles on a single charge.
Power is provided by a hubless motor with 137 hp and 738(!) lb-ft.
The electric motorbike weighs in at a hefty 540 lbs or 245 kg.
This eye-catching all-electric motorcycle is the TS Pro from Verge, and it’s just set a Guinness World Record for the furthest distance traveled by an electric motorbike. Over 16 hours, it was ridden 193 miles (310.6 km) around London and finished the trip with 7% charge still left in its battery pack.
Electric motorbikes have yet to take off in the same way as electric cars, in part because battery packs are heavy, and weight is the enemy on a two-wheeler. However, the TS Pro shows that it is possible to build a compelling electric bike with heaps of power, a usable range, and relatively manageable weight.
Driving the TS Pro is a single hub-less electric motor at the rear with 137 hp and 738 lb-ft (1,000 Nm) of torque. Verge says it needs just 3.5 seconds to hit 100 km/h (62 mph), meaning it can keep pace with some proper sports cars. The bike tips the scales at 540 lbs (245 kg), and while that’s hefty for a bike of this size, it’s not crazy. It also has a claimed riding range of 217 miles (350 km).
To see just how far the TS Pro can travel in the real world, Verge recruited two motorcycle influencers and let them ride the bike around inner London for 16 hours at an average speed of just 12 mph (19 km/h). The bike ended its run, having traveled an impressive 193 miles (311 km), setting a new record in the process.
Admittedly, riding around at slow speeds greatly benefits an EV like this. Had Verge attempted the record while sitting at highway speeds, there’s no way the TS Pro would have been able to travel anywhere near as far as it did.
Subaru teases its upcoming 2026 Trailseeker EV ahead of its debut at the NY Auto Show.
It’s likely been developed with Toyota that will offer its own electric compact SUV in 2026.
Both Subaru and Toyota’s electric SUVs are expected to feature different designs.
The new-generation Outback won’t be the only Subaru making its world premiere at the New York Auto Show later this month. The automaker has just teased another model: the 2026 Trailseeker. So, what exactly is this Trailseeker? Well, Subaru has given us precisely two pieces of solid information: it’s an EV and a photo that shows part of the tailgate and cladded rear bumper. Riveting stuff, right?
Here’s what Subaru did say, though: “Get ready to meet your newest adventure-ready sidekick from Subaru: the all-new 2026 Subaru Trailseeker EV SUV. See it in person at the 2025 New York International Auto Show, coming soon.”
Now, this doesn’t give us a lot to work with—so far, it’s just a whole lot of mystery. We haven’t caught wind of any EV prototypes from Subaru recently, so it’s all a bit speculative at the moment. However, what isn’t speculative is the fact that Subaru has already confirmed it’s working on a compact electric SUV in collaboration with Toyota. Both brands plan to sell it in Japan, Europe, and North America.
Some have speculated that the Subaru version might be a twin to Toyota’s recently revealed CH-R+, which is set to hit the US next year. But, from what we can gather, that’s not the case. Toyota and Subaru have teased separate compact EVs, and the Trailseeker is likely one of those models.
Expect the two electric SUVs to be related in much the same way that Toyota’s bZ4X and Subaru’s Solterra EVs are essentially twins beyond the styling differences. The teaser image from Toyota’s version of the Trailseeker shows a more traditional SUV shape, with a sharp nose, roof rails, and a more upright rear end—think RAV4. At the very least, the two will have different front and rear designs, but Subaru’s version will likely play up the brand’s off-road image with more cladding and possibly other tweaks to match its name.
The good news? We don’t have to wait long to find out. The New York International Auto Show kicks off next week, April 17, so like they say, stay tuned.
McMurtry Spéirling drove upside down using nothing but active downforce from fan technology.
It’s the first demonstration of its kind after years of theorization that it’s possible to do such a thing.
The demo opens new possibilities for performance safety and accessible driver-focused engineering.
Somebody call Jim Hall, because his wild idea of using a fan to stick a car to the road just got its ultimate validation—this time, upside down. More than half a century after the Chaparral 2J used fans to create ground-hugging downforce at any speed, the McMurtry Spéirling has shown just how far that tech can go. To put it plainly, it drove upside down, held to the surface not by gravity, but by sheer aerodynamic force.
The Spéirling is a small but intensely capable electric supercar. Pretty much every time we talk about it, it’s breaking another track record. This time, though, it’s setting an all-new benchmark. It’s the first car in history to drive upside down while held to the ground by downforce alone.
999 Horses, Zero Chill
As a reminder, this tiny terror makes 999 hp (745 kW) and weighs just 2,200 lbs (1,000 kg). If those figures weren’t bonkers already, the car leverages a fan system that sucks the chassis to the ground. It can create an incredible 2,000 kg (4,400 lbs) of downforce at 0 mph (0 km/h). That’s how it just pulled off the coolest thing we’ve seen on four wheels in a while.
During the demonstration, if you can call it that, the Spéirling drove up a ramp onto a specially built platform. There, it engaged its “Downforce on Demand” system, sucked itself to the ground, and the the platform rolled. Only when the platform was 180 degrees from right-side-up did it stop. At that point, the driver moved the car forward while staying on the platform. Then, the entire rig finished rotating back to its original position, and the McMurtry drove off like it was another day at the office.
Behind the wheel for the stunt was Thomas Yates, Co-founder and Managing Director of McMurtry Automotive. “That was just a fantastic day in the office! Strapping in and driving inverted was a completely surreal experience,” he said. “The 2,000 kg of downforce that the fan system can generate is truly astonishing to experience, and it’s great to show the reason why our Spéirling continues to take records around the world.”
Yates added that this was just a taste of what the tech could achieve. “This demonstration was an exciting proof of concept using a small purpose-built rig, but is perhaps just the beginning of what’s possible. With a longer inverted track or a suitable tunnel, we may be able to drive even further! Huge congratulations and thanks to the entire McMurtry Automotive team, especially the engineers involved in the car and fan system’s design, they are the heroes of today.”
The Safety Implications
Perhaps the most interesting part of the stunt is what it implies for real-world performance—and more importantly, safety. Traditional race cars rely on speed to build downforce. That means during slower sections, spins, or emergency maneuvers, they lose grip when it’s needed most. McMurtry’s fan system flips that logic by providing full downforce even when the car’s barely moving.
“The amount of grip and downforce available means that application of the brakes will often see them (the driver) stop almost immediately, often while still on the tarmac,” says McMurtry. What that means for customers is a safer and more approachable experience.
Which brings us to one of the brand’s core goals: making record-breaking performance accessible to actual driving enthusiasts. And with this kind of tech, it’s not just about going faster. It’s about being able to do so with control, confidence, and—if you really want to flex—upside down.
The Department of Government Efficiency reduced NHTSA’s headcount by 4%, raising concerns.
A Tesla manager argues that NHTSA needs more employees, not fewer, for safety oversight.
Critics point to conflicts of interest due to Musk’s influence over NHTSA staffing decisions.
News about recent firings by Elon Musk’sDepartment of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest for the Tesla CEO. During DOGE’s fiery critique of the federal workforce in February, it was revealed that several staff members from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Office of Vehicle Automation Safety had been let go.
The tension between Musk and the NHTSA is hardly a secret. After all, the safety agency is currently investigating Tesla vehicles in eight active cases, and it is responsible for regulating self-driving technology. Musk has long promised that Tesla will deploy millions of robotaxis across the United States, a plan that would be more achievable with fewer regulatory hurdles standing in the way.
Speaking with The Financial Times, insiders revealed that approximately 30 people were fired from the NHTSA in February. It’s believed that those working in the NHTSA’s vehicle automation safety team were “disproportionately affected.” While it’s unclear precisely how many were fired from the specific department, DOGE cited poor performance in axing the jobs of these employees.
Despite the controversy surrounding the layoffs, it’s important to note that the NHTSA’s vehicle automation safety division was only formed in 2023. As a result, many employees were still in their probationary period, making it easier for the agency to terminate their employment. The total layoffs at NHTSA accounted for 4% of its workforce, which may seem small, but it raises concerns from some corners of the industry.
One unnamed Tesla manager expressed concern that the layoffs could weaken the NHTSA at a time when it needs more resources to tackle the challenges of autonomous vehicles. “Letting DOGE fire those in the autonomous division is sheer madness—we should be lobbying to add people to NHTSA,” the manager told the FT. “They need to be developing a national framework for autonomous vehicles, otherwise Tesla doesn’t have a prayer for scale in FSD or robotaxis.”
A former NHTSA employee also weighed in, noting, “There is a clear conflict of interest in allowing someone with a business interest influence over appointments and policy at the agency regulating them.”
Tesla has launched an entry-level Cybertruck Long Range for $69,990 plus destination.
Single-motor, RWD LR undercuts AWD by $10,000, improves range by up to 37 miles.
Downsides include 6.2-sec 0-60 mph time, inferior tow rating and much less standard kit.
Almost 18 months after the Cybertruck finally went on sale in December of 2023, Tesla has finally gotten around to launching a more affordable entry-level model. But the downgraded spec of the Cybertruck Long Range makes you wonder whether you might want to give it a miss.
Not Quite a Bargain, But Better Than Nothing
A simple, single-motor, rear-wheel-drive Cybertruck was always part of the plan. And while the 2025 Long Range’s price of $69,990 plus $2,245 destination and order fees (but before the $7,500 tax credit) is far from the $39,990 that Elon Musk promised this specific trim would cost back in 2019, it still represents a $10,000 savings compared to the existing bi-motor AWD model. It also comes in at $30,000 less than the absurdly expensive Cyberbeast.
And there are other upsides apart from that price. Losing the front motor and driveshafts helps cut the curb weight (Tesla doesn’t specify by how much), enabling the Long Range to secure a 350-mile (563 km) EPA driving range. That’s for an LR with no tonneau cover – order the optional $750 soft tonneau and the electric range climbs to 362 miles (583 km), well above the 325 miles (523 km) claimed for the AWD.
The Catch: A Lot of Equipment Compromises
But from there on things don’t look so good for the Long Range’s chances of snaring buyers. To get that price down Tesla has de-contented the Cybertruck so hard that you’ll be reminded every time you jump in it that you were too tight-fisted to go for the AWD.
Out go the vegan leather seats in favor of simple cloth versions that are still heated, but no longer ventilated, and you’re downgraded to puny 18-inch wheels unless you splash for the optional 20s fitted as standard on the AWD. But the $3,500 cost of doing that really eats into the price differential. Other kit to go includes the height-adjustable air suspension, which is replaced by simple steel springs, and the hi-fi’s speaker count is halved to seven.
Slower and Less Capable
And even if you’re the kind of driver that never gets into the right pedal hard enough to notice or care that the zero to 60 mph (97 km/h) time has grown from 4.1 to 6.2 seconds, you probably are going to care that the tow rating has been decimated. AWD Cybertrucks can haul 11,000 lbs (4,990 kg) but the Long Range is only good for 7,500 lbs (3,402 kg), and there’s a 265 lb (120 kg) payload reduction to factor in, too.
Throw in the loss of the bed’s electrical outlets and the fact that you have to pay extra for a soft tonneau when the AWD gets a retractable one as standard, and the Long Range’s appeal really does start to wane. Tesla would argue that what matters here is that the LR is competitive with mid-ranking Ford F-150 Lightnings, which accelerate slightly faster but don’t go as far on a charge. What do you think? Was the entry-level Cybertruck worth the wait?
Cybertruck Long Range now available
– $62,490 (incl. Federal Tax Credit) – 362 mi of range (est.) w/ Soft Tonneau – 6' x 4' bed – 7,500 lbs towing capacity pic.twitter.com/ZP5S5uxHiY
MG has dropped teaser images of a new Cyber X SUV ahead of the Shanghai Auto Show
Compact, rugged design features a squared nose, upright tail, and full-width LED light bars.
EV power is likely but unconfirmed; SAIC’s new E3 platform also takes hybrid powertrains.
MG’s Cyberster electric sports car helped make a splash for the brand, but it’s never going to sell in the millions. But here’s another Cyber-branded MG that might. It’s the Cyber X, and MG has just dropped teaser images of the boxy SUV ahead of its global reveal at the Shanghai Auto Show on April 23.
A series of silhouetted and darkened pictures show the second car from MG’s Cyber family from the side, the front- and rear-three-quarter angles. The X’s fashionably square nose and upright tail say this is a car designed for a younger crowd than the one usually seen in MG showrooms.
A full-width LED light bar stretches across the Cyber X’s face, with an illuminated MG octagon mounted just below it and flanked by two smaller LEDs. The fenders are flared above the wheels, door handles are sunk flush with the door skin, and a pair of roof rails underlines the go-anywhere vibe. At the rear, the waistline rises to meet the chunky D-pillar, and there’s another full-width LED bar and illuminated MG badge rounding out the show at the tail.
We’ll have to wait until the day of the show to make a final assessment on the design, but from what we can see here, the mix of tech and tough will find the Cyber X plenty of admirers. It’s eerily reminiscent of the new Smart #5, which could be handy because the newly-launched Geely SUV is likely to be one of the X’s key rivals.
Tech details are practically non-existent at this stage, but Chinese reports say that the X will be one of the first cars to benefit from SAIC’s new E3 platform, which features cell-to-body construction where the battery pack is made part of the car’s structure in an effort to cut weight.
The E3 architecture is capable of handling both electric and hybrid powertrains, though right now we don’t know whether the X will offer both or only one of those options. A closed grille suggests we’re looking at an EV. Car News China claims the X will feature semi-solid-state batteries, advanced drive assist features, and sophisticated phone-to-car integration.
We’ll be seeing more than the Cyber X from MG during this year and next. The automaker is preparing to roll out more than half a dozen new cars, including a second-generation MG4, a revised Cyberster, and four EVs, including a pair of sedans and a pair of SUVs. Not all are guaranteed to come to Europe, but our hunch is the Cyber X will find it worth the trip.
The EU and China are negotiating a minimum pricing system to address EV tariff disputes.
Chinese EVs face tariffs of up to 45.3%, with varying rates depending on their subsidies.
Germany, who had fiercely opposed tariffs right from the start, has backed negotiations.
Months after the EU imposed hefty tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, officials from China and the European Union are reportedly working on a deal that would allow them to avoid relying on those tariffs. Instead of sticking with tariffs, the two sides are now exploring the idea of setting minimum prices for China’s EVs as a potential solution.
A spokesperson from the European Commission confirmed that EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic and Chinese commerce minister Wang Wentao recently had a chat and agreed to explore the minimum price idea. At this stage, more discussions are in the works, though no specifics have been shared just yet.
What’s on the Table?
As of now, there’s no clarity on what these minimum prices might look like. Sefcovic spoke with Reuters, emphasizing that any pricing rules would need to be just as effective and enforceable as tariffs, without creating additional complications.
The European Union imposed tariffs on Chinese-made EVs last year following a lengthy investigation to see if Chinese brands received unfair subsidies from their government, allowing them to build and sell EVs for far less than most Western rivals. Newly-enforced tariff rates vary depending on how much assistance individual brands received and how cooperative they were with the EU’s probe.
For example, Chinese conglomerate SAIC received the harshest penalty: a 35.3% tariff on top of the pre-existing 10% import duty. Other companies, like BYD and Geely, were hit with tariffs of 17% and 18.8%, respectively.
The decision to impose tariffs was far from unanimous. Ten EU countries voted in favor, but 12 abstained, and five voted against. Notably, Germany opposed the tariffs, and the country is now pleased that talks are underway to find a more balanced solution.
“Regardless of current global developments, it must also be discussed here how to reduce obstacles and distortions in international trade, rather than building new hurdles,” Germany’s auto industry association, the VDA, said in a statement.
As the negotiations continue, it remains to be seen whether this minimum pricing strategy will gain traction or if it will be another attempt to sidestep deeper issues in global trade.
Factory Zero, which used to be the Detroit-Hamtramck plant, was renovated to build GM’s new EVs.
In 2020, GM poured in $2.2 billion in it, the biggest single investment in a plant in its history.
However, with demand for EVs not being as strong as expected, it now has to revise its plans.
The automotive industry is currently in a state of collective disorder. And while Donald Trump’s constantly evolving tariffs, which make the headlines daily as they have far-reaching consequences in whole countries and their economies, may play a huge role in that, it’s not the only one.
Electric vehicles, which were touted by almost everyone as dominating all major markets in the (very near) future, are definitely gaining ground with each passing year, just not at the rate most automakers were expecting. Excluding China and Norway, the rate of adoption by buyers is not as high as initially predicted, which has led many manufacturers to reverse their pledge to go all-electric and continue producing ICE-powered models in the interim.
Now, GM is about to temporarily lay off 200 out of its 4,500 workers at the all-electric Factory Zero plant in Detroit. As reported by US News, a company source explained that this move is not related to Trump’s tariffs but rather to the automaker adjusting its production to “align with market dynamics”.
For those among us who don’t speak corporate, this means that Factory Zero, which builds solely electric vehicles, specifically the Hummer EV SUV and pickup truck, the Chevrolet Silverado EV, the GMC Sierra EV, and the Cadillac Escalade IQ, needs to slow down for a while as demand for EVs is not as strong as GM anticipated.
Factory Zero used to be known as the Detroit-Hamtramck plant until 2020, when GM decided to turn it into a state of the art hub for manufacturing electric vehicles based on its Ultium platform. To that end, it poured in $2.2 billion which at the time, was, in the company’s own words, the “single largest investment in a plant in GM history”.
The plant’s grand opening took place on November 17, 2021, and then President Joe Biden was there to celebrate this milestone alongside General Motor‘s leadership and factory workers. “GM’s U.S. manufacturing expertise is key to achieving our all-electric future,” GM Chair and CEO Mary Barra said at the opening.“This is a monumental day for the entire GM team. We retooled Factory ZERO with the best, most advanced technology in the world to build the highest quality electric vehicles for our customers.”
Moreover, executive vice president of Global Manufacturing and Sustainability Gerald Johnson stated that “To meet our ambitious EV transition, GM’s North American EV vehicle assembly capacity will reach 20 percent by 2025, and then 50 percent by 2030”. Seems that this target turned out to be more ambitious than GM expected, but if it’s any consolation, the same is true for practically all major car manufacturers – except the Chinese.
Tesla sold 8,653 cars in three days, claiming $30M in rebates just before the deadline.
Canada froze the rebates pending an investigation into whether Tesla gamed the system.
Tesla says these were backlogged orders, not a shady practice, and threatens legal action.
Well, that took a minute, didn’t it? We’re talking about Tesla‘s response to the accusations that it sold a suspiciously huge number of cars in Canada right before the country’s EV rebate program was about to end. Critics and officials question if these were actual sales and whether the company was just gaming the system instead.
So what exactly happened in Canada? In early March, it came to light that four Tesla stores sold 8,653 cars in just three days and claimed C$43.1 million (US$30M) in rebates. This means that each store sold an average of 30 Teslas per hour, 24 hours a day, even when they were supposedly closed, for this three-day period. And if you believe that, I know someone who has a bridge to sell you.
Tesla Claims It Was All Legal, Officials Should Know Better
However, according to Electrek, in a letter dated March 28, Tesla’s director of sales and service for Canada, Fereshteh Zeineddin, says that those filings were normal and that Transport Canada, the government department responsible for the incentive program, should know better.
He explains that many of these rebates were for cars that were already sold but dealers hadn’t simply filed for them yet. Thus, according to the EV maker, it wasn’t really a shady practice on Tesla’s part – just a case of its staff getting their priorities straight as the electric vehicle subsidy program was about to end. The company says that backlogged files were allowed anyway, so it did nothing wrong. Furthermore, these weren’t money that would end in Tesla’s pockets; rather, as per the program, dealers would offer the incentive to buyers and then get reimbursed by the government.
Frozen Rebates Must Be Paid, Or Else…
Tesla also took issue with Canada’s Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland ordering the rebates to be frozen “in order to fully examine each claim individually and determine whether all are eligible and valid,” as she told the Toronto Star. It adds that, due to this investigation, its employees are viewed negatively by the public and have been subjected to verbal abuse and harassment, and if Transport Canada doesn’t resume payments, it may pursue legal action.
Until the investigation is over, we have no way of knowing whether Tesla is telling the truth or not so, until then, it is presumed innocent until proven guilty. It is worth noting, however, that according to the National Post, Tesla deliveries in Canada plunged some 70 percent between December 2024 and January 2025, which makes this sudden surge peculiar. And if we had to guess, the huge drop in sales and the harassment incidents might be the result of Elon Musk getting increasingly political, not just in the US but wherever he sees fit, and not caused by Transport Canada’s investigation.
Bonus Irony: Musk’s Take on Canada
Speaking of Musk and Canada, here’s a bit of irony. Despite holding a Canadian passport and having lived there from 1989 to 1992, Musk recently posted on X that “Canada is not a real country.” He was responding, apparently in jest, to his political buddy Donald Trump’s suggestion that Canada should be annexed as the 51st U.S. state. Maybe he’s just trolling. Or maybe he’s trying to test how much diplomatic damage he can do from his phone.
Whatever the case, the Canadian government doesn’t seem amused—and it’s making very clear that Tesla’s C$43.1 million rebate claim isn’t going to slide through unchecked.
BYD’s cocksure VP claims Denza premium brand’s cars are ‘ten times better’ than rival products.
Stella Li says Denza easily outpoints established competition on technology, comfort and value.
Denza coming to Europe this year with Panamera-shaped Z9 GT shooting brake and D9 minivan.
Launching a new brand into an established market is a brave move with no guarantee of success. But if she has any doubts about Denza’s chances in Europe, BYD boss Stella Li isn’t letting on, claiming in a recent interview Denza’s new vehicles were ‘ten times better’ than than those they aim to outpace, and which include the likes of Mercedes, Audi, BMW, and possibly even Porsche.
BYD’s gains in Europe with its own EVs and PHEVs gives Li reason to be confident. But Denza is shooting for a totally different, more image and status-conscious audience. A premium brand designed to slot between everyman BYD and pricey YangWang, Denza will take on established European names like Mercedes, which could be embarrassing for Benz because Denza started off as a BYD-Daimler co-op before BYD carried on alone.
The Z9 GT is odds-on the first Denza to hit European roads later this year and will offer a more coupe-like alternative to cars like the Audi A6 and A6 e-tron Avant, and BMW 5-series and i5 Touring. A sporty shooting brake whose Porsche Panamera-like profile is the work of former Alfa Romeo and Lamborghini designer Wolfgang Egger, the Z9 is a triple-motor EV with 952 hp (965 PS / 710 kW). An 858 hp (870 PS / 640 kW) 2.0-liter PHEV is also available.
‘This car is really ten times better than the competition,’ Li told Car Magazine at the Denza brand launch at Milan Design Week. ‘We have a lot of unique features the other legacy brands do not have.’
Those features are not limited to aggressive pricing, though you can be sure Denza’s cars will offer more standard equipment at a much lower cost than than their rivals to help hook buyers in. Technology is a big focus: the Z9 will crab-walk and slow-motion drift into parking spaces and round tight turns, tricks you won’t find on premium Western cars (check out the video below).
‘We are confident that buyers will find distinctive, unique appeal in the car’s mix of sophisticated, elegant design, strong performance and astounding technology,’ Li said, adding that Denza’s superior customer service will be key to it carving market share.
European pricing hasn’t been confirmed yet, but in China, the Z9 GT starts at 334,800 yuan and tops out at 414,800 yuan (around $45,800 to $56,800). That’s a serious value play when you consider the Panamera Sport Turismo and Taycan Cross Turismo start at 1,008,000 yuan ($138,000) and can balloon past 1,500,000 yuan ($205,000) depending on options.
Login
