The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is issuing a request for information from school bus industry stakeholders as it seeks to add biodiesel, renewable diesel (RD) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as funding options to a revised Clean School Bus Program.

Thursday’s RFI also mentions hydrogen as an eligible fuel listed by the Investing in Infrastructure and Jobs Act, which created the five-year, $5 billion fund. But there are currently no hydrogen school buses in production. The same goes for liquefied natural gas, which differs from propane. The IIJA also mentions CNG, which won a handful of awards, but manufacturers don’t currently produce that fuel option, either.

Diesel-powered school buses do exist in large numbers nationwide, estimated at about 80 percent of the national fleet of approximately 450,000 vehicles. Many operate with biodiesel blended with regular diesel. The RFI specifically states EPA seeks information on B20, or 20 percent biofuel blend with diesel.

Renewable diesel, or RD, is different from biodiesel as the former is produced by a hydrotreating process, making it a hydrocarbon fuel. Because it is otherwise nearly identical to petroleum diesel, RD is a drop-in fuel alternative that diesel engine manufacturers certify for use in their engines without voiding warranties. But RD is more expensive than petroleum diesel except in California, Oregon, New Mexico and Washington, where Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits are at play.

Electric school buses are not a focus of the RFI because EPA said it has sufficient information on its infrastructure, availability and performance.

EPA added electric school buses have accounted for 90 percent of Clean School Bus Program awards to date, and the next funding round should target other allowed alternative fuels “to allow for the maximum number of affordable bus choices to fit school districts’ specific needs.”

What’s in the RFI?

EPA is asking the current availability and anticipated purchasing within the next year to five years of biodiesel, RD, E85 flex fuel, CNG, LNG, propane or any other biofuel and if those school buses are fueled at the school district facility, an offsite private fueling station, or an offsite public station. EPA also wants to know about fuel supplier arrangements.
Specifically for biodiesel and RD, EPA is asking for details on how the blends or drop-in fuels are used.

It requests information on fueling system components, pricing, construction and installation requirements, performance, domestic content, and other practical considerations.

The RFI also states EPA wants information on how it can further safeguard taxpayer dollars. The agency completed an internal review to assess financial management practices and said it uncovered inconsistent documentation, incomplete adherence to reporting an award conditions, improper or premature drawdowns of funds, and insufficient internal controls by certain awardees, including for profit recipients.

EPA said it is “evaluating additional safeguards and conditions for for-profit entities,” which includes audits of financial statements and conflict of interest policies. It is also considering verification tools or documentation to ensure appropriate bus usage and routes before funds are disbursed; milestone-based payment structures, reimbursement-only models, or phased disbursement mechanisms tied to verified delivery to reduce risk and improve accountability; and enforcement mechanisms such as repayment obligations or clawback provisions in cases of nonperformance, noncompliance, or misuse of funds.

The Clean School Bus Program is set to expire at the end of the current fiscal year, which would require the remaining $2 billion that has yet to be awarded needing to rollout over the next six months.

Public comments are due within 45 days of EPA publishing the RFI in the Federal Register. A webinar is scheduled for March 3.

---

Related: EPA ‘Revamping’ Clean School Bus Program
Related: Engine, Truck Manufacturers Support EPA Easing Derate of SCR Diesel Emissions Controls
Related: Deploying Electric School Buses in Rural and Suburban Districts

The post EPA Seeks to Expand Fuel Scope of Clean School Bus Program appeared first on School Transportation News.

When East Aurora School District 131 faced growing transportation challenges, the district turned to an unexpected solution. By partnering with First Student’s First Alt^®, East Aurora transitioned away from using taxis and cabs and implemented a safer, more reliable alternative for students who need it most.

In this webinar, you’ll hear directly from Gladys De Lucio, Director of Transportation at East Aurora, and Leon Fornelli, AGM at First Alt, as they share how the district:

• Built on its existing partnership with First Student to expand into alternative transportation.
• Leveraged FirstView^® and Samsara technology to improve visibility, tracking, and communication for schools and families.
• Met the needs of one of Illinois’ largest Spanish-speaking communities with bilingual dispatchers who provide trusted communication with parents in their native language.

Join us to discover how East Aurora created a student-first transportation model that improved efficiency, strengthened family trust, and set a new standard for safe, consistent rides.

Brought to you by First Student

REGISTER BELOW:

Presenters:

Gladys De Lucio
Director of Transportation
East Aurora School District 131

Gladys De Lucio is the Director of Transportation for East Aurora School District 131, one of Illinois’ largest Spanish-speaking districts. With 21 years of experience in school transportation, she oversees daily operations with a strong focus on safety, bus stop planning, and community engagement. De Lucio leads both traditional bus services and alternative transportation programs, working closely with bilingual dispatch teams to support non-English-speaking families. Her deep commitment to equitable access ensures that every student has reliable transit to and from school. She holds a degree from Robert Morris University–Illinois.

Leon Fornelli
Area General Manager of Alternative Transportation
First Alt^®

Leon Fornelli, MBA, is the Area General Manager of Alternative Transportation at First Alt^®, where he leads inclusive student transportation programs across nine states. A seasoned leader in education logistics, Fornelli develops and scales operations from the ground up, always with safety, equity, and innovation in mind. He’s deeply committed to increasing access, amplifying parent and community engagement, and building systems that meet diverse student needs, including non-traditional routes and support. Fornelli also champions technology integration and workforce development in transportation services.

Gregg Prettyman
Vice President
First Alt^®

As Vice President of First Alt^®, Gregg Prettyman brings more than 13 years of leadership in alternative student transportation and is recognized as one of the original architects of the alternative transportation model. Before joining First Student, Prettyman served as Chief Operating Officer at ALC Schools, where he supported over 400 district contracts across 20 states, and oversaw more than 10,000 student trips each day. Today, he leads a team with over 50 years of combined experience, all focused on helping districts deliver safe, reliable, and cost-effective transportation for students with unique needs.

The post (Free Webinar) From Taxis to Trusted Rides: East Aurora’s Student Transportation Transformation appeared first on School Transportation News.

Ford has lifted the lid a little further on its so-called “Universal Electric Vehicle” project, the one tasked with delivering a brand-new $30,000 electric midsize truck in 2027. The tech breakdown in the 14-minute teaser packs plenty of stuff, but it is the design sketches that really grab your attention, offering the first glimpse of what this thing might look like in the metal.

From those early drawings, which also align with the ghost images seen so far, the truck appears slippery and futuristic. Think of it as a softer, more rounded take on the larger Tesla Cybertruck, minus the origami and unpolished edges, not to mention with a far more reasonable entry price. Up front, there are slim vertical LEDs, an illuminated Ford badge, and horizontal intakes carved into the bumper.

More: The One Car Ford Refuses To Build Is One Dealers Want The Most

The windshield stretches deep into the hood and flows into an integrated roof spoiler at the rear. Despite the futuristic surfacing, this is still (likely) a Ranger-sized pickup with a traditional dual-cab layout. Practicality has not been shown the door.

Ford

Low Drag Is Key

Unsurprisingly, the aerodynamics team had a heavy hand in shaping this truck, with former F1 experts brought in to chase every last fraction of efficiency. The mission was simple: slash drag hard enough that smaller batteries could deliver the required range, keeping production costs in check.

More: Ford Says Every Millimeter Of Roof Saves $1.30 On Its New $30K EV Truck

The curved roof reportedly reduces the turbulence typically created by a pickup bed. The side mirrors are 20 percent smaller than standard items, adding 1.5 miles (2.4 km) of range, while specially designed underbody panels contribute another 4.5 miles (7.2 km).

In total, Ford estimates these measures deliver 50 miles (80 km) of additional range compared to a similarly sized truck with a more conventional shape. That is not a rounding error.

Lower Production Costs

Aerodynamics are only half the story. Ford has also focused heavily on reducing manufacturing complexity. The company will use large aluminum unicastings, broadly similar in principle to Tesla’s gigacasting method. Structural components drop from 146 pieces in today’s Ford Maverick to just two, and overall weight is said to be 27 percent lower than rival offerings.

More: Next Ford And GM Pickups May Swap Mechanical Linkages For Lines Of Code

Fewer parts and fewer joints mean fewer robots on the line, which Ford claims results in “measurable gains” in both build quality and production efficiency.

it also appears that Ford engineers have borrowed lessons from reverse-engineering Chinese and Tesla EVs. The new truck’s wiring is 4,000 feet (1.2 km) shorter than that of the Mustang Mach-E crossover, trimming 22 pounds (10 kg). It will run prismatic lithium iron-phosphate (LFP) battery cells and a separate 48V system for auxiliary functions.

More: Ford Could Bring Back Sedans After Realizing It Can’t Afford Not To

The skunkworks team behind Ford’s next generation of EVs is led by former Tesla executive Alan Clarke, bringing 12 years of experience from the rival automaker.

As for the name, Ford is staying quiet. A recent patent filing hints at a possible return of the Ranchero badge, though nothing is confirmed. The affordable pickup is due in 2027 and will be followed by additional affordable EVs, with a sedan reportedly on the wish list.

Shortly after pulling the covers off the electric GLC EQ last year, Mercedes-Benz slipped out a shadowy teaser of the upcoming all-electric C-Class. It was the sort of image designed to spark arguments rather than answer questions. Now, a new batch of renderings based on that teaser gives us a clearer sense of where the compact executive EV could be headed.

Front and center sits the talking point. The C-Class EV’s grille looks set to grow rather than shrink, ignoring the recent retreat from oversized snouts at BMW and Audi. Instead, Mercedes appears ready to make it the visual anchor of the car, in much the same way Rolls-Royce leans on its Pantheon grille.

Read: Mercedes Previews C-Class EV With A Face That’s Bound To Start Fights

These renderings from Kolesa show how the grille should come standard with a thick silver or chrome-finished bezel, three horizontal slats, and hundreds of little LEDs.

Flanking it is a fresh headlight design, complete with the now-familiar star-shaped daytime running light signature seen on other new Mercedes models. All told, the lights, plus the grille, give the new sedan a very intriguing look, although we wouldn’t exactly call it elegant.

We have not had this officially confirmed, but some reports suggest the electric C-Class could adopt a liftback layout, much like the new Audi A5. If that proves accurate, expect a cleaner, more tapered rear than the combustion-powered version. The renderings show slim LED taillights set within a gloss-black panel that spans the full width of the car.

MB.EA Underpinnings And 800-Volt Charging

Just like the GLC EQ, the new C-Class EV will be based on the MB.EA architecture and come standard with a 94 kWh battery pack and an 800-volt electrical architecture, supporting 330 kW charging speeds. Mercedes has confirmed it will offer a driving range of up to 497 miles (800 km), easily eclipsing the 443 miles (713 km) offered up by the GLC EQ.

The first version could wear a C400 badge, pairing dual electric motors for a combined 483 hp. That should be enough for 0 to 60 mph (96 km/h) in under five seconds, which is brisk by any sensible definition.

Naturally, AMG versions are on the way too. One prototype has already been spotted testing on large 21-inch wheels with carbon-ceramic brakes.

Mercedes’ new C-Class teaser and camouflaged prototypes spotted by our spies.

As for the cabin, details remain under wraps. Mercedes could simply transplant the 39.1-inch seamless MBUX Hyperscreen from the GLC EQ, turning the dashboard into one continuous slab of illuminated glass. Alternatively, it may opt for the newer Superscreen layout featured in the latest CLA, pairing a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster with a 14-inch central infotainment display and a matching 14-inch passenger screen.

The new C-Class EQ is expected to debut before the end of this year, with a global launch slated for early 2027.

Illustrations Kolesa

Polestar’s designers and engineers may be working overtime to prepare four new EV launches by 2028, but management is already looking beyond the rollout. High-performance variants are on the agenda, suggesting that expansion will not come at the expense of speed.

Michael Lohscheller, Polestar CEO, spoke about the future during a media gathering at the Gothenburg headquarters in Sweden. As reported by Auto Express, he said:

“In terms of how we will continue to deliver performance with our future models, I think we’re going to deliver a more consistent way in terms of performance cars, in terms of the specifications. We want to focus a bit more on performance, because that is where we can do even better going forward, on track, on acceleration, but also in terms of being superior to others.”

More: One-Off Polestar Arctic Circle Edition Models Are Rally-Inspired EVs Ready For Action

Just a few months ago, Polestar was forced to shut down its last UK-based R&D facility as it took a $900 million loan from parent company Geely to survive heavy losses. Despite the closure of the engineering center responsible for the development of the Polestar 5, Lohscheller believes that the brand still has the expertise to take on BMW M, Mercedes-AMG, and Audi RS.

Central to this strategy is the expansion of the “BST” (short for “Beast”) moniker, which will evolve from a limited-production experiment with the Polestar 2 BST Editions into a high-performance sub-brand. Note that Polestar itself used to be the performance sub-brand of Volvo.

More: New Polestar 5 Doesn’t Need A Rear Window To Put Porsche On Notice

While the CEO didn’t get into details, candidates for future BST variants are the next-gen Polestar 2 sedan, the recently updated Polestar 3 SUV, and the Polestar 4 coupe crossover, which will soon gain an estate bodystyle.

As for the Polestar 5 grand tourer, it already packs 872 hp (650 kW / 884 PS) in Performance guise, meaning that an even hotter version could challenge the likes of the Audi RS e-Tron GT, Porsche Taycan Turbo GT, and Xiaomi SU7 Ultra.

Back in 2024, the company revealed the track-focused Polestar Concept BST that was based on the 6 roadster. However, the rollout of this model has been pushed back, with focus being shifted to more profitable models in mainstream segments.

Polestar

Electric vehicles are turning into a proper migraine for the insurance industry. According to the latest report from collision management software provider Mitchell, repairable collision claims for EVs jumped 14% in the US and 24% in Canada during 2025.

What makes these numbers particularly jarring is the fact that EV sales growth slowed down in 2025 as government tax incentives expired and consumer interest shifted to hybrids. Cox Automotive estimates that new EV sales dropped approximately 2% in the US, with S&P Global Mobility reporting a 0.4% decline in new EV registrations.

More: Car Repair Costs Are Exploding And It’s Not Just About Tariffs

Even Tesla’s grip on the market loosened slightly, with its US market share slipping to 46.2% from 48.7% in 2024 as more competitors gained ground.

Rising Repair Complexity

Even so, the existing EV fleet is aging into more accidents, and the complexity of repairing them is becoming a logistical and financial hurdle for the repair industry.

Ryan Mandell, Mitchell’s vice president of strategy and market intelligence, explained: “Due to their dense electrical architectures, software-driven systems and interconnected, sensor-heavy designs, these vehicles require additional diagnostic and calibration operations when damaged that can add cost, complexity and cycle time to each repair.”

The “Plugged-In: EV Collision Insights” report also examined other electrified vehicles. Repairable claims for PHEVs increased 6% in the US and 26% in Canada in 2025. Mild-hybrid models (MHEV) recorded increases of 20% in the US and 29% in Canada. It is worth noting, however, that MHEV sales in the US surged 28% in 2025.

Also: Why Even The Smallest Accident Is Designed To Destroy Your Wallet

Across North America, British Columbia recorded the highest EV repair demand at 8.48%, followed by Quebec at 8.21% and California at 6.58%.

Which Models Top The Claims List?

Looking at individual models, Tesla continues to dominate claims volume. In the US, the Model Y accounts for 30.32% of repairable BEV claims, followed by the Model 3 at 27.01%, meaning the two together represent more than half of all such claims. The pattern is similar in Canada, although the positions are reversed, with the Model 3 at 26.03% slightly ahead of the Model Y at 25.91%.

The Economics Of Fixing An EV

There is at least one sliver of good news. On the repair side, the average cost to fix an EV fell 5% in the US, from US$ 6,707 to US$ 6,395, and declined 2% in Canada in 2025. ICE-powered vehicles and PHEVs remained largely flat in the US, while MHEVs saw their average claim cost rise 4%, from $4,865 to $5,054.

Nevertheless, the higher repair complexity of electrified vehicles is reflected in their “calibrations per estimate” rating, which tracks how often sensors and systems must be recalibrated after repairs. In 2025, the average number of revisions was 1.70 for EVs and 1.63 for hybrids, compared to 1.54 for ICE-powered vehicles.

Mitchell’s data also shows that 86% of EV parts dollars go toward OEM components, with only 13% of parts deemed repairable rather than replaceable. For ICE-powered vehicles, 62% of parts dollars go to OEMs, and 15% of components are considered repairable.

The Depreciation Trap

Mitchell also reported that total loss market values declined across most powertrain types in 2025, with EVs seeing the sharpest drops. In the US, EV values fell 6%, from US$ 30,126 in 2024 to US$ 28,185 in 2025. In Canada, they dropped 13%, from CA$ 41,775 to CA$ 36,504.

More: China’s EV Boom Is Cooling, And The Big Names Are Feeling It

By comparison, ICE vehicle values declined 2.55% in the US, from $14,241 to $13,887, and 6.12% in Canada, from $17,049 to $16,005. Hybrids presented a more mixed picture, with US values rising 4.18%, from $18,453 to $19,225, while Canadian values fell 4.40%, from $30,268 to $28,938.

Analysts attribute the steeper EV declines to accelerated depreciation, the arrival of more budget-friendly models, and shifts in consumer sentiment.

Ford is preparing to launch a $30,000 electric truck, and the steady drumbeat of promotion is starting to wear a little thin. Earlier this month, the Blue Oval released three glorified blog posts about the affordable mid-size pickup and a 14 minute video, which was approximately 10 minutes too long.

Before that, the company talked about failure and Henry Ford’s ill-fated stints at the Detroit Automobile Company and the Henry Ford Company. The automaker then said they’re pursuing similar bold efforts as it “works to design and assemble affordable electric vehicles.”

More: Ford’s ‘Model T Movement’ Is A New $30,000 Electric Pickup

The thing is that $30,000 electric vehicles already exist and can be bought today. While the upcoming model will be notable for being a mid-size truck that introduces some new techniques and technology, it might not be as revolutionary as Ford would have you believe.

The Blue Oval will likely continue trickling out trivial details for months to come, but shoppers could easily head to their nearest Chevy dealer and snag an Equinox EV. While the model starts at $34,995, the company is offering $6,500 in incentives, and this lowers the price of entry to $28,495 before factoring in the $1,800 destination fee.

The bowtie brand also recently brought back the Bolt, which starts at $27,600 and has a $1,395 destination fee. This means you can get an electric hatchback with 262 miles (422 km) of range for $28,995.

Chevrolet isn’t alone as the redesigned Nissan Leaf starts at $29,990 before a $1,495 destination charge. It will eventually be joined by an even more affordable variant that has a smaller battery pack and a less powerful electric motor.

All three of these vehicles are available now, although they lack a truck bed. Ford is banking on the latter being a big differentiator, although early teaser images suggest this won’t be your typical pickup as the company is focusing on range and efficiency.

Drinking water around the District of Columbia hasn't been contaminated. But scientists say the environmental damage could be severe.

(Image credit: Nathan Ellgren)

Blue Bird Corporation announced its pending acquisition of the remaining 50-percent equity interest in Micro Bird, a joint venture with Canadian bus manufacturer Girardin Minibus. ​The $198.2 million deal, which values Micro Bird at $429.6 million, is expected to close by the end of the second quarter, pending regulatory approval and customary closing conditions. ​

The OEM confirmed Micro Bird President Eric Boule and his current management team continue to oversee day-to-day operations.

The Micro Bird brand originated in the mid-1970s, when Blue Bird introduced its first Type A school bus built on a cutaway van chassis. Blue Bird entered a supply agreement with Girardin Minibus in 1992 to build the Micro Bird in Quebec. The most recent joint venture between Blue Bird and Girardin was signed in 2009, which created Micro Bird, Inc.

The transaction announced Tuesday is funded through a combination of 70-percent stock and 30-percent cash. It includes the $16.5 million purchase of Micro Bird’s new manufacturing facility in Plattsburgh, New York and the transfer of its OEM service parts inventory for $400,000, according to a company presentation on the deal strategy and structure. ​Blue Bird said it plans to issue 2.7 million shares to fund the stock portion and use $154.2 million in cash for the remainder. ​

Blue Bird said the acquisition is expected to enhance the company’s market share in the K-12 student transportation industry by expanding its product portfolio to include a comprehensive lineup of Type A, C and D buses powered by diesel, gas, propane, and electric powertrains. ​The deal will also double Micro Bird’s addressable market in the U.S., thanks to its compliance with Buy America requirements, and strengthen Blue Bird’s presence in Canada. ​

The transaction is projected to be immediately accretive to earnings, with an estimated 8.2 percent increase in earnings per share in fiscal year 2026. ​Blue Bird’s pro forma revenue is expected to grow from $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion, while adjusted EBITDA is forecasted to increase from $225 million to $250 million. The company said it anticipates long-term revenue growth to reach $2.5 billion by 2030, with an EBITDA margin exceeding 15 percent. ​

Micro Bird, known for its high-quality school, commercial and electric buses, is well-positioned for long-term growth. ​Blue Bird said the acquisition will enable it to leverage Micro Bird’s expertise in electric vehicle technology, streamline development and expand into adjacent markets such as commercial and specialty vehicles as well as drive engineering efficiencies, enhance market share, and deliver value to shareholders through profitable growth and stock buybacks. ​

This article is developing.

---

Related: NASDPTS Sunsets School Bus Manufacturers Technical Council, Announces Updates
Related: School Bus Manufacturers Stay the Course Despite Regulatory, Funding Uncertainty
Related: Engine, Truck Manufacturers Support EPA Easing Derate of SCR Diesel Emissions Controls

The post Updated: Blue Bird to Acquire Full Ownership of Micro Bird, Expand Market Share appeared first on School Transportation News.

Last year, BMW announced a major product blitz that will see the company introduce over 40 new or updated vehicles by 2027. Unsurprisingly, BMW M is working on a major offensive of their own.

Speaking to CarSales, BMW M CEO Frank van Meel said “We’re working on up to 30 new models that will come out in the next two and a half years.” That’s a lot, but it’s important to note the number includes both M and M Performance vehicles.

Also: BMW’s Next Boss Already Has 40 New Models On His Plate

While the executive didn’t say what to expect, other than the i3 M, spy photographers have snapped an assortment of prototypes in recent months. Besides the facelifted M5 and M5 Touring, the company is working on a new M3 and iX3 M.

They’ll be joined by redesigned versions of the X5, X6, and X7, which will spawn a mix of M and M Performance variants. We can also expect M Performance versions of the facelifted 7-Series.

The Rise Of M Performance EVs

Speaking of M Performance variants, van Meel said electrified models – such as the i4 M60 – have proven popular in countries where regulations on combustion engines make traditional performance cars expensive. As he noted, “In France, you have to pay 18,000 euros ($21,212) CO2 tax on a combustion engine M2.”

More: BMW iX3 M Coming As A Quad Motor Performance EV

That’s ridiculously steep and it bodes well for the upcoming i3 M, which will feature a quad motor powertrain. However, the executive said he isn’t sure how customers will respond to the model. While only time will tell, van Meel believes the vehicle has “exactly the technology everyone has been waiting for … in a high-performance [electric] car.”

Despite the focus on electric vehicles, BMW M isn’t putting all its eggs in one basket. Quite the opposite as the executive said they have a “long tradition” of six- and eight-cylinder engines, and “we are planning to continue this because we have a big community worldwide, and also a lot of people that are maybe not ready yet, or live in environments where it’s really difficult, to charge the electric cars.”

Manual Seems Doomed

While internal combustion engines are sticking around, the manual might not be as lucky. As van Meel explained, “From an engineering standpoint, the manual doesn’t really make sense because it limits you in torque and also in fuel consumption.”

However, he added that from an emotional and customer standpoint, “a lot of people still love manuals, so that’s why we kept them, and we intend to keep them as long as possible.”

Unfortunately, the clock appears to be ticking as he said “It’s going to be quite difficult, in the future, to develop completely new gearboxes because the segment in the market is quite small, and the suppliers are not so keen on doing something like that.” This means manual transmissions will likely be safe for the “next couple of years,” but it will likely become “difficult to keep the manuals alive, especially in the next decade.”

Electric vehicles have come a long way in the past few years, and the progress is finally showing up where it matters most: in owner satisfaction. According to the latest data, these steady gains in technology and infrastructure are translating into record-high approval from drivers.

That’s the verdict from JD Power’s 2026 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience Ownership Study, which found premium EV satisfaction climbed from 756 points last year to 789 in 2026. Mainstream EVs also improved two points to hit 727 out of 1,000.

More: A Third of Americans Are Priced Out Of New Cars, And It’s Getting Worse

The highest rated premium EVs were the Tesla Model 3 (804), Tesla Model Y (797), and BMW i4 (795). On the flip side, the new Audi Q6 e-tron came in dead last at 690. It placed well below the Lucid Air (740) and Rivian R1T (739).

Segment Standouts And Stragglers

On the mass market side of the equation, the Ford Mustang Mach-E took top honors with a score of 760. The electric pony car was followed by the Hyundai Ioniq 6 (748) and Kia EV9 (745). Interestingly, the two lowest rated EVs were the Chevrolet Blazer EV (711) and Honda Prologue (623). That’s a huge point spread considering both models are built by GM and have a lot in common.

Of course, things aren’t completely straightforward as the study examined ten different factors. This includes the “accuracy of stated battery range, availability of public charging stations, battery range, cost of ownership, driving enjoyment, ease of charging at home, interior and exterior styling, safety and technology features, service experience, and vehicle quality and reliability.”

Encouragingly, 96 percent of EV owners said they would consider buying or leasing another one and the study also found quality has improved. That’s especially true of premium EVs, which had 15.9 fewer problems per 100 vehicles compared to last year. This brought the total down to 75 and JD Power said this was driven by noise improvements as well as fewer problems with driver assistance technology.

Is Charging Still A Concern?

The study also found that EV drivers are becoming more satisfied with public charging. Scores climbed by over 100 points and this is being attributed to growing charging infrastructure as well as the opening of Tesla’s Supercharger network to other automakers.

Last but not least, EV drivers are more satisfied than those with plug-in hybrids. Premium EVs scored 114 points higher than their PHEV rivals, while mainstream electric vehicles had a 117 point advantage. Part of this can be chalked up to the cost of ownership as plug-in hybrid drivers have to deal with a more complex powertrain that involves gas and electricity.

In a statement, JD Power’s Brent Gruber said “Improvements in battery technology, charging infrastructure and overall vehicle performance have driven customer satisfaction to its highest level ever. What’s more, the vast majority of current EV owners say they will consider purchasing another EV for their next vehicle, regardless of whether they benefited from the now-expired federal tax credit.”

Don’t look now, but Tesla might actually be on schedule, if not slightly ahead, at least for now, with its Cybercab program. The automaker says the first production example rolled off the line on Tuesday, more than a month earlier than Elon Musk previously suggested. Its CEO also confirmed pricing.

Read: Tesla Spent Big On Cybercab Branding, Now Someone Else Owns It

Of course, plenty of hurdles remain if Tesla plans to sell one before the end of the decade. And yes, at least one major YouTuber could end up shaving his head if Musk’s team pulls it off.

Tesla posted a photo on February 17 showing the team at Gigafactory Texas surrounding the first production Cybercab. While there’s still no clear timetable for full-scale production, Musk previously indicated that manufacturing wouldn’t even begin until April. I double-checked my calendar, and it still says February.

Importantly, this is almost certainly a pilot build and not a car destined for a customer. That said, it’s a significant step forward for a brand often associated with shifting timelines.

Public Bets And Pricing

That reputation likely played a role in Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) saying in 2024 that if Tesla launched the car before 2027 at a price below $30,000, he’d shave his head on camera.

https://t.co/0nls5D9FX8 pic.twitter.com/NEGKdfmQOL

— Whole Mars Catalog (@wholemars) February 17, 2026

After Tesla announced the milestone, meme versions of a bald MKBHD quickly spread across X. Musk joined in, replying “Gonna happen 😂” to one such post. In a separate exchange, he also confirmed that Tesla still plans to sell a consumer version of the Cybercab before 2027 for “$30,000 or less”.

Hurdles Ahead

That all sounds promising, but Tesla has to do more than simply build the car. The Cybercab is meant to be the brand’s first true autonomous vehicle sold without a steering wheel or pedals. Since unveiling it, however, Tesla has hinted that those controls could return if regulations require them.

And that’s where the real challenge begins. Federal vehicle safety standards assume a human driver is present, and insurance frameworks do too. The NHTSA may need to grant exemptions for certain rules, while individual states could impose their own restrictions on autonomous vehicles operating on public roads.

In other words, building the Cybercab might prove easier than getting it legally approved. Whether Tesla can clear those hurdles before 2027 remains an open question.

California is known for its beach vibes, but the state’s climate offers a little bit of everything. That’s especially true in the mountain town of Truckee, which reportedly received more than 10 inches of snow in the past 24 hours.

While snow is a fact of life in the Sierra Nevadas, some people aren’t used to the cold conditions. That appears to include a Rivian R1S driver, who discovered how weather can impact range.

More: Louisiana Town Threatens Drivers Without AWD, Then Mocks The Backlash

On Facebook, the California Highway Patrol posted a short clip of an R1S that apparently ran out of juice in the middle of a snow covered intersection. Authorities didn’t say what happened, but the video was accompanied by a message saying “Cold weather drains batteries faster than you think. If you’re rolling over the Summit, make sure your charge level matches your confidence level.”

They also advised drivers to charge up, slow down, and carry snow chains. While that’s a good reminder, police appeared to mock EVs and the driver as the post was tagged #ItsElectric and #MakeGoodDecisions.

Last week, they joked about a Tesla driver who lost control and went down an embankment. In that post, they said “Chain control was lifted earlier this morning and some of you took that as a personal challenge to full send anyway.” It was accompanied by an assortment of tags including #MakeGoodDecisions, #DonnersGonnaDonner, and #SlowYourRoll.

This appears to be a common theme with the Truckee post, but the criticism isn’t limited to EV drivers. Some people seem to get a kick out of this as one popular comment was “My new winter goal is to not be featured on your social media page.”

A Rivian R1T owner has just learned the hard way that “touchless” does not mean “harmless.” Sure, these washes skip the spinning brushes, but that does not make them gentle. As it turns out, high-pressure water and moving hardware can still do a number on a six-figure electric pickup.

Posting on Reddit, the owner says he recently took his R1T through a touchless car wash for the first time when a black plastic panel at the rear of the EV’s roof suddenly popped off. That panel covers a fair bit of electronic gubbins, including the antenna, and is secured with clips and adhesive. Obviously, it is meant to stay put.

Read: That Rattle In Your Rivian Might Mean A Recall

Photos show several of those clips torn loose, with adhesive strips peeled back as if the truck had tried to shed its own roof trim. It would be easy to blame water pressure or the industrial-strength dryers at the end of the tunnel, but that does not appear to be what happened.

According to the owner, one of the wash’s spraying arms became lodged under the roof panel, apparently misjudging the height of the pickup. Instead of gliding past, it hooked underneath and pried the piece upward. Not exactly part of the premium wash package.

Image Reddit/mrwillya

Some commenters on the Reddit thread suggest that in order for Rivian to repair the rear roof panel, it’s possible that part of the interior will have to be removed to gain access to all of the wires positioned beneath the panel. Additionally, the third brake light of the R1T is positioned directly above the rear window near this panel, and may also need to be replaced.

Then there’s the matter of who will end up paying for the repairs. The owner says the car wash’s insurance will cover the costs, though that likely means a round of negotiations between insurers before any money changes hands. In the meantime, the damaged truck could spend weeks, possibly longer, waiting in a body shop bay for parts and repairs. So much for a quick rinse.

After years of sparring with California regulators, Tesla has agreed to stop using its famous Autopilot term in the state, neatly sidestepping a 30-day suspension that would have frozen sales in its biggest US market with nearly 180,000 deliveries last year.

More: Tesla Quietly Kills Standard Autopilot, Now Wants $99 A Month To Give It Back

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) wasn’t amused by Tesla’s marketing language, arguing that phrases like “Autopilot” and “Full Self Driving Capability”, later softened to “Full Self-Driving (Supervised)”, gave buyers the impression their cars could drive themselves. The DMV pointed out that they can’t now, and never could, operate as autonomous vehicles.

The formal accusations were filed in 2023, though regulators traced the issue back to marketing language used as early as May 2021. At the time, Tesla described its system as capable of handling short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver’s seat, a claim the DMV said crossed a legal line.

60 Days To Find A Fix

A judge agreed and proposed suspending Tesla’s dealer and manufacturer licenses for a month. That would have been awkward timing for a company trying to convince the world that robotaxis are just around the corner. The DMV offered Tesla 60 days to fix the issue before the suspension started, and instead of digging in, Tesla wisely took corrective action.

“The DMV is committed to safety throughout all California’s roadways and communities,” said DMV Director Steve Gordon. “The department is pleased that Tesla took the required action to remain in compliance with the State of California’s consumer protections.”

So Autopilot, as a marketing term, is now gone in California (though you’ll still find it on the brand’s EVs elsewhere in the world). The company had already softened Full Self Driving into Full Self Driving Supervised to make it crystal clear that, no, the car is not fully autonomous. By complying with the deadline, Tesla avoided the suspension and kept the revenue rolling in.

Autopilot Feature Phased Out

This is not just a word swap, though. We reported last month that Tesla had already begun phasing out the previously standard Autopilot system on its cars, replacing it with Traffic Aware Cruise Control and pushing buyers toward a $99 per month Full Self Driving subscription.

Lane centering that rivals include as standard now lives behind a paywall, and CEO Elon Musk has hinted that the subscription price could rise over time. From a business perspective, it’s clever, but from a branding perspective, it looks like a climbdown.

Autopilot was one of Tesla’s most recognizable terms, though it was also one due to be left behind in the coming years as the far more sophisticated FSD improves to the point where it really can deliver full self-driving.

Ferrari is no stranger to controversy, and it rarely shies away from it either. Its upcoming all-electric Luce could turn out to be the most polarizing project yet. The man behind the design, Jony Ive, Apple’s former design chief who shaped the iPhone and several other era-defining products, admits he is feeling the pressure.

That seems like a perfectly reasonable response with a historic unveiling just two months away, especially when you are tasked with redefining what a Ferrari is supposed to be in the modern era.

More: Ferrari’s Luce EV Has A Glass Key And Buttons That Click Like A Rifle Bolt

This isn’t just another EV launch after all. It is Ferrari, a brand built on racing at the highest levels and on exciting V12 supercars, sometimes only obtainable through wild buying rituals, and now venturing into the silent world of EVs.

A Defining Electric Debut

SHProshots

Calling it a big deal would be a massive understatement, which is probably why Ferrari hired Ive and fellow designer Marc Newson for the task of shaping the Luce.

The exterior, in fact, has been penned by LoveFrom, the design house founded by Ive and Australian designer Newson, which makes this less a routine Ferrari project and more a collision between Maranello and Silicon Valley minimalism.

Speaking to Autocar, Ive openly admitted that he’s “anxious” about revealing the car to the world. It’s not concern over the design itself that sparks that feeling, but instead the gravity of just how big this moment is for Ferrari. He called it “still clearly a Ferrari,” but went on to say that “It’s a different manifestation based on some of the beliefs around simplicity and the inherent beauty of something.”

On the flip side, his co-designer, Newson, highlighted the freedom offered with such a project. “One of the great and serendipitous sort of things is that this is an electric vehicle, the first electric Ferrari, right? So that afforded us a degree of freedom that perhaps we would otherwise have not had: literal physical freedom or creative freedom… on many levels here,” he said.

Inside The Luce Philosophy

At this stage, we’ve already seen official bits of the interior. The brand unveiled the dash earlier this month. It’s quite the departure from other modern Ferraris. That’s key because Ive and Newson say that the entire car has a “consistency and a singularity” about it.

Ive has also stressed that there is “no disconnection” between the exterior and interior, noting that both were designed simultaneously rather than by separate departments. In his view, that approach results in a complete package that feels cohesive rather than pieced together.

What we also know so far is that the Luce will be a four-door, four-seat GT with a ride height similar to the Purosangue, and that it will feature a 1000hp four-motor powertrain. Ive has hinted that the car will be “big” in its proportions and just as radical on the outside as it is within.

Will The Luce Use Rear-Hinged Doors?

SHProshots

To that end, we wonder if the exterior will be far more retro-futurist than previously expected. While Ive was talking about the new Luce, our spies caught another heavily disguised prototype undergoing testing in northern Sweden this week.

Like earlier Luce testers, this one was wrapped in makeshift panels from top to bottom, making it extremely difficult to interpret what is happening underneath beyond a general sense of its proportions and size.

One detail our photographers did catch appears to be a set of door handles, circled in red, positioned just under the B-column in the middle section. According to our photographer, the Luce may be using suicide-style rear doors that open toward the front of the vehicle, similar to the Purosangue. This has not been officially confirmed, and it could just as easily be Ferrari engaging in a bit of cheeky misdirection.

We will know for certain in May, when Ferrari finally unveils its first EV.

SHProshots

Polestar may be wrestling with the sort of losses that keep finance teams awake at night, but it is not backing off. The Geely-owned brand has four new EVs lined up before 2028, each aimed at the market’s sweet spots. On the way are the 5 grand tourer, a more practical wagon take on the 4, a fully reworked 2 sedan, and an all-new 7 compact SUV. Busy times ahead.

The “Wagon” Polestar 4

Polestar’s current best seller is the 4, though its coupe-style roofline has always leaned more toward drama than practicality. That changes in the fourth quarter of 2026, when a new variant arrives with roof rails and a redesigned tail, complete with an actual rear window. Revolutionary, we know.

The aim is to attract a “wider customer base”, which is executive-speak for people who enjoy seeing out the back.

More: Polestar 4 Pricing Is Out And So Is The Rear Window

CEO Michael Lohscheller says the updated 4 “combines the space of an estate and the versatility of an SUV with the dynamic performance that is Polestar”. In plain terms, it keeps the same underpinnings as today’s car but swaps in a reshaped silhouette and a roomier cabin. Same bones, more boots-and-dogs potential.

The Next-Gen Polestar 2

Next up is a full new generation of the Polestar 2, due in early 2027. The current Tesla Model 3 rival has been around since 2019 and received a mid-lifecycle update in 2023, so a deeper rethink feels timely.

More: 2026 Polestar 2 Looks The Same But Hides Major Interior Upgrade

An official, albeit blurry, teaser suggests the 2 will trade its slightly crossover-ish stance for something lower and sleeker, complete with split LED headlights and a pared-back bumper design. Less high-riding fastback, more grounded sports saloon. Or at least that seems to be the direction of travel.

Europe-Built Compact SUV

Then there is the Polestar 7, landing in 2028 as a contender in Europe’s largest EV segment. And yes, Polestar’s naming scheme remains mildly baffling. It will be built in Slovakia and share its hardware with Volvo models. Lohscheller describes it as a “progressive performance-driven car” offered at “a very attractive price point”.

The Grand Tourer Is Here

At the top of the tree sits the Polestar 5 grand tourer, which only reinforces the point about that confusing nomenclature. Revealed in production form at the 2025 Munich Motor Show, it is scheduled to begin European deliveries in summer 2026. This is the halo car, the statement piece.

It rides on a lightweight bonded aluminum platform and, in Performance guise, packs a dual-motor setup producing up to 872 hp (650 kW / 884 PS). That is comfortably in the realm of serious performance, and proof that Polestar still wants to talk about speed as much as sustainability.

Optimism Despite Heavy Losses

All of this comes against a complicated financial backdrop. Last year, Polestar posted its best-ever retail sales, shifting 60,119 vehicles, up 34 percent, while also wrestling with deepening losses.

Even so, the mood at the top remains upbeat. Despite what Lohscheller calls a “challenging geopolitical and economic environment”, he remains optimistic about the future: “We are targeting the heart of the EV market, where customer demand and profit pools are high.” Confident words. Now comes the hard part.

Polestar

A quick look around the automotive industry would have most thinking that EV adoption is slowing down. Whether that perception holds true or not, Toyota is moving ahead full steam with not one, but three new electric vehicles, and the C-HR might be the most playful of the bunch. Yesterday, we talked about how the bZ Woodland is a great improvement on the old bZ4x. 

Review: 2026 Toyota bZ Woodland Is Quicker Than A GR Corolla, But That’s Not Its Real Trick

Today, the focus shifts to the C-HR, a revived nameplate that now returns exclusively as an EV. It’s a huge deal beyond just the fact that it’s going electric. It’s the first formerly gas-powered Toyota nameplate to go fully electric. Sure, it only beat the new Highlander by a few months, but that’s more than enough. Both will have a big impact on Toyota moving forward. 

While we don’t know what the Highlander will end up selling for, the C-HR is clearly aimed at a different demographic. With a starting price shy of $38,000 before destination and handling, it’s aimed at Tesla Model Y buyers wanting something a touch smaller. Packing standard all-wheel drive, 338 hp (252 kW), and almost 300 miles of range, it’s a new face in the segment that will no doubt blow up one day. 

Quick Facts

Now, all that’s left is to figure out if it’s good enough that it’ll gain a foothold for a long ride, or if it’s still a battery cell or two away from a fully-formed EV. Thankfully, a week of testing it in hilly Ojai, California, helped us figure out the good from the bad. 

Styling

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Let’s not play coy. While the C-HR’s nomenclature has always invited comparisons to Honda’s HR-V, the exterior designs couldn’t have been much more different when it first arrived. We’re happy to report that the same playful attitude carries over to this new electric version of the crossover. 

The front end adopts Toyota’s newer hammerhead design language, with a low, aggressive nose and slim lights that visually widen the car. The coupe-like roofline flows cleanly into the rear, and from certain angles, the C-HR almost looks more hatchback than crossover, which works in its favor. It feels athletic despite being clearly compromised on that front. 

Also: New Toyota Highlander Drops Its Biggest Tradition, And I Got A Front-Row Look

Compared to the bZ Woodland, the C-HR looks tighter and more urban. It’s clearly aimed at buyers who want something sporty and expressive rather than rugged or adventurous. The wheel options help sell that image, too, with 18-inch alloys on the SE and aggressive 20-inch wheels on higher trims.

If the old C-HR was bold but polarizing, this one is more mature. It’s still stylish, but it’s less desperate for attention and more apt to provide an experience worthy of an offbeat appearance. 

Cabin Space

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Toyota told us early on that we’d see a lot of crossover between this and the bZ Woodland, and it was right. It leverages supportive front seats, an intuitive infotainment setup, a steering wheel that feels good in your hands, and visibility that’s better than the sloping roofline suggests. The driver’s position feels good, though; we’d love a little more adjustability from the steering wheel. 

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

The 14-inch touchscreen dominates the dashboard and comes standard across the lineup. It’s responsive, cleanly laid out, and avoids the over-complicated UI issues that plague some competitors. Dual wireless charging pads and practical storage touches reinforce that Toyota still knows how to design for daily life.

Material quality is a step up from Toyota’s earlier EV efforts, too. Soft-touch surfaces and ambient lighting keep things modern without crossing into gimmicky territory. And then you climb into the rear seats. Things go from perfectly livable to suddenly only for the smallest around us. 

How Tight Is Too Tight?

I get that as a taller-than-average guy, I won’t fit everywhere, but I was sincerely shocked at just how tight the back seats of the C-HR are. This is a compact crossover, and that’s clear as soon as we compare it to another new crossover in the form of the Mazda CX-5. 

The Mazda has a wheelbase that is just 2.5 inches (63 mm) longer. Despite that, the CX-5 offers 7.7 inches (195 mm) of additional legroom, up to 2.8 inches of headroom, and in total over 10 cubic feet of extra space in the rear seats. Put simply, rear-seat occupants won’t be happy in the C-HR unless they’re relatively small. That said, they’ll fit kids just fine. 

Cargo space fares better, with 25.3 cubic feet behind the rear seats and nearly 60 cubic feet with them folded. That’s perfectly usable for daily life, but the passenger packaging tells you clearly where Toyota’s priorities were.

Driving Impressions

Here’s where the plot thickens, in the best way possible. EVs are well-known for their instant torque, but that doesn’t automatically make one good to drive. The way the C-HR moves about the world is with more authority than one might expect. It’s sharp. The short wheelbase helps it manage bends with confidence. And the steering is more communicative than in the larger bZ Woodland. 

Toyota claims 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds, and it absolutely feels believable. This thing moves… not with the aggressive chaos of a GR Corolla, but with the smooth, relentless urgency only an EV can deliver. In fact, this might be the quickest pseudo-practical car in Toyota’s lineup right now. It’s not trying to be a sports car, yet it’s faster in a straight line than many cars that are.

The low battery placement keeps the center of gravity down, and the chassis feels planted through corners. Steering is light but accurate enough that you want to push a little harder than you probably expected. There’s a maturity to the tuning. It’s composed, predictable, and easy to trust. The brakes are excellent, too. 

The regenerative braking paddles let you adjust deceleration on the fly, which adds a layer of driver involvement often missing from mainstream EVs. It’s not revolutionary, but it does make the driving experience feel more interactive.

Ride quality strikes a nice balance, too. It’s firm enough to feel sporty without punishing you over rough pavement. The C-HR doesn’t feel like a small SUV pretending to be sporty. It just feels like a well-sorted EV with some genuine personality. No, it’s a far cry from a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or a Tesla Model Y Performance, but it’s the EV I’d pick from Toyota’s lineup if driving feel was all that mattered. 

More: Toyota Made An Electric Subaru Outback As Powerful As A Supra

From a more practical standpoint, range tops out at 287 miles on the SE trim, dropping slightly with the larger wheels. Charging speeds max out at 150 kW DC fast charging. That’s enough to go from 10–80 percent in roughly 30 minutes under ideal conditions. As we’ve seen in the past, ideal conditions can be rare, but the inclusion of Tesla’s NACS port should help. 

Competition

The C-HR lands in an increasingly crowded space, but its personality gives it, like the bZ Woodland, a unique angle. The Tesla Model Y remains the benchmark for space and usability. It’s roomier, more versatile, and easier to live with if rear-seat comfort matters. The Model 3, while technically a sedan, also beats the C-HR for rear-seat comfort despite looking smaller.

Frankly, comparing it on paper to most cars in the segment makes the C-HR look like a middling choice at best. Even pairing it against its badge-engineered sibling, the Subaru Uncharted, it costs more and isn’t available with front-wheel drive, which unlocks more range. That said, I’m not about to start complaining that we need more front-wheel drive cars.

Where the C-HR stands out is key, though. All-wheel drive is something that plenty of folks want and or need where they live. Second, it’s probably the easiest car in the segment to park, thanks to great sightlines and one of the shortest wheelbases here. That matters. 

No, it’s not the quickest, cheapest, or most spacious. Instead, it’s leaning into the vibe of a compact, economical electric vehicle to the best of its ability in its current form. And that form just so happens to be quite attractive and fun. 

The Verdict

Toyota just launched the new Highlander in all-electric form, which is a huge deal in itself, but let’s not forget that this new C-HR is the first formerly gas-powered Toyota to go all-EV in America. That’s also a big deal, and it makes this little commuter car an important inflection point in history. 

To that end, it’s great to see that Toyota didn’t hold back here regarding performance. The C-HR is properly quick, genuinely fun to pilot, and even fun to look at. The front seats, infotainment, and overall driving position are all excellent, and on the road, it feels composed, lively, and far more engaging than many electric crossovers in its segment.

That said, it’s not without compromise. Rear-seat space is tight enough to be a real consideration, especially if you regularly carry adults. This is a crossover that prioritizes style and driving feel over maximum practicality. And honestly, that might be exactly the point. Here, the fun comes first, and the practicality, while important, comes in second place. Will it be a mix that sells well? Only time will tell. 

Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops

Volkswagen is spending billions on Scout’s rebirth, but things might not be going according to plan. Quite the opposite as a new report out of Germany claims the company is postponing the launch by a year.

A report from Spiegel attributes the delay on “technical problems,” although specifics are hazy and said to include a financial component. However, in a statement to The Drive, a spokesperson said “Scout Motors has not shared any timing or product update announcements.”

More: Scout Concept Rethinks What Actually Belongs On The Back Of An SUV

That sounds like a carefully worded response that doesn’t confirm or deny anything, only the fact they haven’t announced any updates. Regardless, the company’s website says initial production is targeted to begin in 2027.

Still, Scout gives themselves plenty of wiggle room as the launch date is accompanied by a disclaimer that reveals the timeline is “based on current projections and is subject to change.” The automaker goes on to say the “anticipated production date is an estimate and may be affected by various factors.”

While the brand is staying tight-lipped, Scout introduced updated Traveler and Terra concepts at the Los Angeles Auto Show last year. They were minor evolutions of the original models that were introduced in October of 2024 and more closely preview the production truck and SUV.

Scout has shared little about the vehicles recently, but they’ll be offered with electric and range-extended powertrains. The former will have a range of approximately 350 miles (563 km), while the latter increases that distance to more than 500 miles (805 km) thanks to a gas engine that acts as a generator.

The company has reportedly received over 150,000 refundable reservations and roughly 85 percent are said to be for the range-extended variant. However, there’s still a lot we don’t know about the vehicles and it appears they could be running behind schedule.

We discuss the potential impact of the national jobs report on school district budgets, the DOT’s non-domiciled CDL final rule and cutting-edge technology takeaways from the Geotab Connect conference. 

“It’s all about service: I went from servicing my country to now servicing my community.” Bernando Brown, director of student transportation for DeKalb County School District in Georgia, shares how his military experience shaped his work ethic, leadership style and focus on training and mentorship. He also discusses handling retention, budgeting and operational challenges.

Read more about leadership.

This episode is brought to you by Transfinder.

Message from EverDriven.

 

Message from School Radio.

 

Stream, subscribe and download the School Transportation Nation podcast on Apple Podcasts, Deezer, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Stitcher and YouTube.

The post (STN Podcast E294) Boots to Buses: Military Formed Georgia Student Transportation Leader appeared first on School Transportation News.