Ford hangs its hat on the creation of the assembly line. Now, it’s literally tearing one apart in the middle of the night. That’s a part of the brand’s new strategy to win over more buyers. If it’s successful, the work it’s doing now will allow it to not just beat domestic automakers in the U.S., but to compete against China worldwide with a cheap but robust electric car.

More: Ford’s $30K Pickup Wants To Beat Cybertruck At Its Own Game

The “skunk works” project has been underway for quite some time now. Led by former Tesla and Apple employees, the team is aiming for something unheard of. It involves the confirmed $30,000 EV pickup truck (which can end up leading to several forms of cars) that offers some 300 miles of range and Mustang-like performance. That’s the kind of car that doesn’t exist in America, but it does exist elsewhere, namely China.

Ford’s CEO Jim Farley has tested Chinese cars in his everyday life. He’s also had a front row seat to the billions that his brand has burned through in building out its own EV platforms. According to the Wall Street Journal, that’s included too many parts, too much complexity, and old-school processes that don’t translate well to the EV space. So the team is cutting everything it can as aggressively as it can.

The manufacturing process itself is being flipped on its head. Instead of traditional step-by-step assembly, Ford is moving toward a modular system with large cast sections and fewer touchpoints. Put another way, it’s how Tesla and Chinese automakers build EVs today. According to Jolanta Coffey, the vehicle program director, “We’ve never blown the whole thing up before and just started over. If and when we build this, we will rewire Ford.”

All of this comes at a turning point for much of the industry. Automakers abroad are continuing their push toward electrification while domestic automakers rethink the near future. Hyundai Motor CEO José Muñoz, recently said of competing with Chinese EVs, “It is impossible… Unless they are subsidized by the government.” Ford’s betting he’s wrong. We all get to see who ends up being right as Ford is aiming for a 2027 launch.

Rivian broke the mold by bringing the R1T, an electric pickup truck, to market before anyone else. Now, it’s trying to gain a far more stable foothold in the industry with its all-new R2. A new report sheds light on how Rivian cut costs but evidently not quality in this new SUV. According to the brand, it costs around half as much to build as the R1S despite keeping the performance and utility that fans love.

At the core of the R2’s cost-cutting approach is ruthless simplification. Rivian says its new zonal electrical architecture slashes wiring complexity, trimming 2.3 miles of harness length and reducing connectors by 60%. High-voltage cabling is down 70% thanks to consolidating multiple power modules into a single unit.

The same philosophy carries over to the powertrain. Rivian’s new “Maximus” drive unit uses 41% fewer parts than the Enduro units found in the R1 lineup. By integrating the inverter directly into the drive unit and even using its housing as a mounting structure, Rivian cuts both material cost and assembly time.

Read: Rivian Lost $416 Million Last Quarter And Just Bet Bigger On Georgia

According to InsideEVs, even the sensors got a rethink. Swapping ultrasonic sensors for corner radars yields a claimed 50% cost reduction, a move that reflects a broader trend toward fewer, more capable components. In theory, that could help Rivian reduce repair costs, a known concern for the brand.

The front suspension ditches the more complex double-wishbone setup used in the R1 for a simpler MacPherson strut design, cutting costs by 70%. Large die-cast sections reduce underbody part count by 90%, while rear doors shed 65% of their complexity.

There’s also a less glamorous but equally important factor: scale. When Rivian launched the R1T and R1S, it was a newcomer building expensive, low-volume vehicles. Now, with higher production targets in sight, it can negotiate better supplier pricing.

Something as basic as a windshield reportedly costs half as much on the R2 compared to the R1. Add in the fact that the R2 is simply smaller, and therefore uses fewer raw materials, and the math starts to make sense. At this point, all that’s left is to see how Rivian executes on production and sales.

The shift to more screens in cars was supposed to be the wave of the future. We could customize them, enjoy cute little animations, and pack more info into them than anyone could dream of doing with an analog gauge cluster. Of course, an old-school mechanical cluster can’t disappear for no obvious reason during a drive. Over 20,000 Stellantis vehicles with a digital cluster might have just that happen, so the automaker is issuing a new recall.

According to documents put together by Stellantis and filed with the NHTSA, the issue potentially exists in 100 percent of the 20,271 affected vehicles built from March of 2024 through November 2025. 11,743 are Jeep Wagoneer S EVs, and the other 8,528 are Dodge Charger Daytonas.

Read: Stellantis Faces Third Recall As Jeep Hybrid Engines Keep Failing

Stellantis says it met internally about the issue on March 10, 2026 and worked with its FCA engineering team to understand what was happening through the end of that month and into April. On April 16, it decided to issue the recall but not simply because the gauge cluster was going dark. No, instead, it’s doing this because when the cluster goes dark it can no longer alert the driver to certain information.

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards require that a car can alert a driver to issues with systems like the ABS, TPMS, ESC, and more. When the panel in a Jeep Wagoneer S or Dodge Charger Daytona takes a nap, it can’t tell the driver if there are issues with these key systems. As a result, Stellantis must recall the cars and fix the issue.

Notably, the automaker stopped well short of describing exactly what causes the panel to blank out in the first place. It appears that it’s entirely software-related, as the ‘remedy’ is quoted as “software,” in the filing. Dealers will simply update the cluster software, and that should prevent them from taking a break while the driver is driving.

Hyundai EV owners just received a little more peace of mind over a part that some say has a 10 percent failure rate. This isn’t a backup camera, a loose windshield wiper, or a missing cotter pin either. It’s a part called the Integrated Charging Control Unit (ICCU), and when it fails, it basically strands the car.

The South Korean company has now extended warranty coverage to 15 years or 180,000 miles for some EVs with ICCU issues. That sounds great, but there’s more to the story unfolding right now.

Read: Hyundai Fixed His ICCU Then Let Thieves Total The Rest Before He Even Saw It

As we’ve highlighted both in the past and even this week, ICCU concerns are a big deal for Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis owners. The ICCU is one of those parts most owners never think about until it fails. It manages onboard charging and helps keep the 12-volt battery alive. It’s basically the EV equivalent of the old-school alternator’s job. When it dies, the car can lose power, stop charging properly, or simply refuse to start, and plenty of owners have been there.

Recently, Hyundai extended its warranty coverage on affected vehicles in Europe. According to a statement provided by Hyundai Motor America to Torque News, the automaker has approved a warranty extension for the ICCU on certain affected U.S. EVs, stretching coverage to 15 years or 180,000 miles, whichever comes first. That’s a major jump from the previous 10-year/100,000-mile protection. There are a couple of notable caveats to consider, though.

What About Kia And Genesis?

First, there’s no word from Kia or Genesis yet about if they’re also going to extend coverage on affected cars. While it’s highly likely that each will end up extending their coverage, too, an official statement would be nice. Carscoops reached out to both brands but didn’t receive a response at the time of writing. The second concern is how Hyundai’s warranty tool works.

Hyundai says affected owners should check their VIN through Hyundai Motor America’s campaign lookup tool and contact dealers if they see warning lights, charging issues, or reduced power. Sounds simple enough, but when many owners check the site, they get nothing.

Multiple commenters on the original report say they’ve entered VINs for 2022, 2023, and even recently failed 2025 Ioniq 5s, only to see no ICCU campaign listed at all. Finally, there’s reason to wonder if Hyundai has fixed the ICCU issue altogether or if the potential replacement parts will one day fail as well. That’s at the heart of a new lawsuit that Hyundai hasn’t yet responded to. At this point, no one knows, but owners surely hope this isn’t the case.

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N made the driving experience engaging, playful, and more akin to the experience of a combustion car. After plenty of praise surrounding the fake gearshifts and engine noise used in this model, Hyundai expanded the tech to the 6 N and Ioniq 9. Soon, it’ll find its way into more mainstream Hyundai EVs.

More: Hyundai’s N Rule Was Simple Until The Ioniq 3 Made It Inconvenient

“We really want to have a proper [driving] experience – not just the sound, but a bit of the boost,” Hyundai Europe product vice president Raf van Nuffel told Carsales. What he’s referring to is that Hyundai doesn’t just use fake engine sounds. It manages power so that when drivers call for a ‘gear shift’, the car feels like a clutch engaged and released.

The system can be switched off, so drivers won’t have to use it. That said, it’s a defining feature of models like the 5 N, and most enthusiasts seem to enjoy it. Introducing the feature to the Ioniq 9 and other mainstream cars down the road could help Hyundai stand out from a crowd of otherwise silent contenders. Importantly, the brand says it won’t extend the features to base models, but there’s a reason for that.

“It is not something that we limit to N, but we have certain requirements – we do need a minimum level of power to have this clutch-type feeling. We are not going to offer it across the range, but definitely [there is] more to come without always having to go for 600 horsepower,” van Nuffel said.

There’s little doubt that fake engine sounds have been divisive. Despite that, plenty of automakers use them now, and they’re not just limited to EVs. Combustion cars often pipe in faux exhaust noise to “enhance” the driving experience. Hyundai is taking that approach and adding in more than just audible sensations. Considering that owners can choose if they want them or not, this seems like a win-win.

Hyundai and Kia have built some genuinely impressive electric vehicles over the last few years but one issue continues to plague many owners. A single part called the Integrated Charging Control Unit, or ICCU for short, manages charging between the high-voltage battery and the 12-volt system to ensure both systems work properly and in harmony.

The thing is that when the ICCU fails, the car can largely become a giant brick. Hyundai and Kia have issued recalls to fix ICCU-related issues but now a class action lawsuit claims that the fix is just using more bad parts.

More: Hyundai Fixed His ICCU Then Let Thieves Total The Rest Before He Even Saw It

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, targets Hyundai Motor Company, Kia, Genesis Motor, and Hyundai Kefico, the supplier behind the charging control units. Affected vehicles include the 2022–2024 Kia EV6, 2022–2024 Hyundai IONIQ 5, 2023–2025 Hyundai IONIQ 6, 2023–2025 Genesis GV60, 2023–2025 Genesis Electrified GV70, and 2023–2024 Genesis Electrified GV80.

According to the filing reviewed by Carcomplaints, the central grievance isn’t that these cars have problems. It’s that they allegedly keep having them after a recall was meant to put the matter to rest. Two plaintiffs, Hayes Young of New Jersey and Roy Williams of Kentucky, say their recall service accomplished nothing.

Young says his 2023 IONIQ 5 SEL suffered a dead 12-volt battery in December 2025 that required replacement under warranty. He claims the problem returned, and his dealer allegedly pointed to the ICCU as the cause, yet no replacement was offered.

Williams says his leased 2025 EV6 entered limp mode after a loud bang, requiring a tow to the dealer. After battery charging, software updates, and eventually a battery replacement failed to solve things, the ICCU was reportedly replaced in March 2026.

The lawsuit also cites owner complaints involving charging plug damage during home charging and dashboard warnings like “Check Electric Vehicle System” and “12-volt battery voltage low stop safely.”

Importantly, none of the defendants (Hyundai, Kia, etc) has responded to the suit. Typically in cases like this, the automaker(s) will file a motion to dismiss but it may be several days or longer before the next step in the process takes place.

Most Cybertruck buyers appear to be the kinda folks that want to make a statement. The focus of this story is an owner who uses it to make a living. After piling up 100,000 miles, mostly for Lyft in Nashville, he says the slab-sided truck is everything from a money-saving workhorse to a warranty-free financial gut punch waiting to happen. Despite everything he’s experienced, he still wants to take this thing to a million miles.

The inventively named user LyftDr1ver on CybertruckOwnersClub shared their story early this week. They say they drive over seven hours at a time for work, which helps explain how they’ve racked up mileage in the six figures.

Driving a conventional truck that much every day would no doubt cost a great deal in gas or diesel. This person is reportedly paying around $12 a day. They say that’s around $350 a month. If you’ve been to a gas pump lately, you know how wildly low those operating costs are. There are other benefits to the Tesla as well.

More: Uber And Lyft Drivers Are Using FSD Teslas As Robotaxis

The driver reports that passengers like the interior space, the panoramic roof, and the smooth ride. The sound system is another highlight, and the truck bed is “ridiculously functional and spacious,” too. One thing that might surprise most is that this person reports a good experience driving in heavy traffic despite its size, thanks to the steer-by-wire setup. Of course, there are downsides to consider as well.

Being an early Cybertruck build, there are plenty of build-quality annoyances. A tonneau cover that leaks, a suspension clunk that won’t go away, a wireless charger that heats phones up too much, and an initial set of tires that went bald 40,000 miles into the ownership experience. They also note the battery has degraded to about 299 miles of range at full charge.

None of that is as rough as dealing with the $7,200 repair bill for a failed power conversion system that died at around 60,000 miles. As the owner says, “Tesla shows no mercy when you’re outside your warranty.” Those fuel savings dry up real quick after a bill like that, but it’s worth noting that most gas or diesel vehicles would also have some big maintenance bill of this sort with this kind of mileage.

At this point, the owner has two big hopes. First, that the truck doesn’t break down, and second, that they can drive it until the odometer shows seven figures. For some reason, those goals seem ambitious at best, but hey, more power to you, LyftDr1ver.

Electric vehicles are quick, quiet, and typically offer awesome packaging and an easier maintenance schedule than combustion-powered cars. Where they struggle to keep up with their gas-powered competition is on the refueling side of things.

Charging infrastructure is nowhere near what it is for gas-powered cars, and when one does find a charger, it can take a long time to get a battery that’s flat back to full. Now, CATL says it’s found a solution, and it’ll charge a battery from 10 to 98 percent in just 6.5 minutes.

More: This New Battery Could Outlive You, Never Mind Your Car

According to The Wall Street Journal, the new Shenxing 3 battery hits that mark in roughly 6.5 minutes, beating the charging capability BYD revealed just last month, which took nine minutes to go from 10 to 97 percent, or seven minutes from 10 to 70. Bernstein analysts told the publication the new battery “effectively closes the gap with ICE vehicles.”

CATL says the new pack is capable of a 10C charging rate and can go from 10 to 80 percent in just 3 minutes and 44 seconds. Even more impressive, the company claims the battery can still charge from 20 to 98 percent in around nine minutes even when temperatures plunge to -22 degrees Fahrenheit (-30 Celsius).

Perhaps most impressive is that CATL says these charging speeds don’t destroy long-term battery life. Evidently, the Shenxing 3 still retains over 90 percent of its capacity after 1,000 full charging cycles.

CATL also introduced the new Qilin 3 battery, which it says can deliver up to 621 miles (1,000 km) of range while weighing just 1,378 pounds (625 kg). That makes it significantly lighter than comparable packs and, according to the company, improves efficiency, acceleration, braking, and handling. Oh, and wait, there’s more.

A new Qilin Condensed battery can deliver up to 932 miles (1,500 km) of range in a sedan or over 621 miles (1,000 km) in a full-size SUV. Obviously, that kind of range would be a giant benefit for the EV industry as it would reduce range anxiety and the need for additional charging infrastructure.

CATL says the Shenxing 3 and Qilin 3 batteries are intended for production vehicles rather than distant concepts, with the first applications likely arriving within the next year or so. The more ambitious Qilin Condensed battery appears further off, while CATL says its sodium-ion battery will enter mass production by the end of 2026.

Electric vehicles are quick, quiet, and typically offer awesome packaging and an easier maintenance schedule than combustion-powered cars. Where they struggle to keep up with their gas-powered competition is on the refueling side of things. Charging infrastructure is nowhere near what it is for gas-powered cars, and when one does find a charger, it can take a long time to get a battery that’s flat back to full. Now, CATL says it’s found a solution, and it’ll charge a battery from 10 to 98 percent in just 6.5 minutes.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the new Shenxing 3 battery can hit that mark in roughly 6.5 minutes, beating the approximately nine-minute charging capability BYD revealed just last month. Bernstein analysts told the publication the new battery “effectively closes the gap with ICE vehicles.”

More: This New Battery Could Outlive You, Never Mind Your Car

CATL says the new pack is capable of a 10C charging rate and can go from 10 to 80 percent in just 3 minutes and 44 seconds. Even more impressive, the company claims the battery can still charge from 20 to 98 percent in around nine minutes even when temperatures plunge to -22 degrees Fahrenheit (-30 Celsius). Perhaps most impressive is that CATL says these charging speeds don’t destroy long-term battery life. Evidently, the Shenxing 3 still retains over 90 percent of its capacity after 1,000 full charging cycles.

CATL also introduced the new Qilin 3 battery, which it says can deliver up to 621 miles (1,000 km) of range while weighing just 1,378 pounds (625 kg). That makes it significantly lighter than comparable packs and, according to the company, improves efficiency, acceleration, braking, and handling. Oh, and wait, there’s more.

A new Qilin Condensed battery can deliver up to 932 miles (1,500 km) of range in a sedan or over 621 miles (1,000 km) in a full-size SUV. Obviously, that kind of range would be a giant benefit for the EV industry as it would reduce range anxiety and the need for additional charging infrastructure.

CATL says the Shenxing 3 and Qilin 3 batteries are intended for production vehicles rather than distant concepts, with the first applications likely arriving within the next year or so. The more ambitious Qilin Condensed battery appears further off, while CATL says its sodium-ion battery will enter mass production by the end of 2026.

The Porsche Cayenne Coupe has never quite added up on paper. It’s a sportier, less practical version of an SUV meant to add a boatload of practicality to a sporty brand. Now, Porsche is adding another powertrain because buyers want options.

After some 40 percent of U.S. buyers chose the less practical Coupe body style of the Cayenne in 2025, they have an all-new, all-electric version available, and it just so happens to boast up to 1,139 horsepower (850 kW).

Also: Porsche’s New Wireless Charger Is Fast, But It’ll Cost You

We’ve known for a while that this was coming. Porsche already released the Cayenne Electric SUV. This is the Coupe version with its “911-inspired” roofline. It also features a unique roof structure and a coupe-specific windshield, giving it a more steeply raked profile than the SUV.

Under the sheet metal and cramped back seat, you’ll find the same bones as the normal Cayenne Electric. That includes an 800-volt architecture, a 113 kWh battery, and the ability to leverage a 400 kW charger to go from 10-80 percent in under 16 minutes.

Read: Porsche Turns Cayenne EV Coupe Into A Hypercar Hunter

The base model starts at 435 hp (325 kW) and 615 lb-ft, which already feels like overkill for a daily SUV. Step up to the Cayenne S Coupe Electric, and you’re looking at 657 hp (490 kW). But the real headline grabber is the Turbo Coupe Electric: up to 1,139 hp (850 kW) and 1,106 lb-ft, with a claimed 0–60 mph (97 km/h) time of just 2.4 seconds. That matches the fastest 911 on sale today, the 911 Turbo S.

Top speeds vary depending on the model, ranging from 143 mph (230 km/h) in the base version to 162 mph (261 km/h) in the Turbo.

That’s not just quick. It’s supercar territory in something that can tow 7,716 lbs (3,500 kg). Adaptive air suspension, optional rear-axle steering, torque vectoring, and Porsche’s trick Active Ride system all make appearances, too. Buyers can also opt for an Off-Road Package that improves approach angles

The Sport Chrono package and a panoramic glass roof are both standard on the Coupe. Charging hardware includes a NACS port on the driver-side rear fender and a J1772 AC port on the passenger side, with a CCS adapter included as standard.

Pricing starts at $113,800 and climbs to $168,000 for the Turbo, with deliveries expected by late summer 2026.

Importantly, Porsche isn’t replacing the gas Cayenne. Or even the plug-in hybrid. They’re all sticking around. That’s key because it makes the brand’s viewpoint clear. Customers can pick and choose whatever type of powertrain they want for the foreseeable future.

SPECS & PRICING

*Prices exclude a $2,350 destination fee.

Electrified bike-shaped vehicles are becoming more and more commonplace across the USA. One of the latest additions to the market is the Infinite Machine Olto, and what it might lack in lightweight construction or conventional design, it makes up for in sheer utility and practicality. Now, after a review and a deep dive into the specs, it’s easy to see why the manufacturer sees it as a car alternative.

The Olto is technically classified as a Class 2 ebike in most places. That’s problematic for real ebike riders, as we’ve pointed out in the past. The loophole that allows this 175-lb electric moped that goes up to 33 mph (and faster downhill) to be sold as an ebike is probably also what allows Infinite Machine to build and sell it in the first place. As an e-moped or e-motorcycle (both things that it’s far more akin to), it would have to navigate more regulations, and riders would likely need to do more with regard to getting licensed and insured to use it.

More: Colorado Police Lost Most Of The Dirt Bike Pack And Still Managed To Start A Bigger Fight

That said, the product itself is noteworthy for several reasons. Let’s start with the basics. The Olto starts at $3,495, and for that price, buyers get a 48-volt architecture, a 25-Ah removable battery, a 2-kW rear hub motor, weatherproof aluminum bodywork, NFC unlocking, GPS tracking, anti-theft alerts, automatic steering lock, USB-C charging, and even over-the-air software updates. In other words, it has more tech than some actual cars.

The Olto’s biggest trick is that it changes personality depending on how you use it. In Class 2 mode, it behaves like a legal e-bike with a 20 mph top speed and throttle operation. Switch to Class 3 and it can hit 28 mph, although you have to use pedal assist (yes, it has dinky little almost vestigial pedals to get into the ebike segment). Put it in Off-Road mode, and the full 33 mph is unlocked. Infinite Machine says the companion app can even tailor the settings based on local laws. In its review of the Olto, The Verge says it managed to achieve 36 mph.

All of that tech should explain why Infinite Machine sees this as a car alternative. With 40 miles of range, it’s more than enough for most commutes, errands, or quick city runs. That said, if the battery dies, good luck pedaling it.

Most folks would struggle to pedal a 30lb mountain bike very far, and those are designed for human-powered movement only. The Olto isn’t. On the plus side, the removable battery can be charged indoors, while the bike itself is designed to stay outside thanks to its weatherproof construction and built-in security features. Is it truly worth $3,495? Probably for those who will truly use it instead of a car.

Most ebikes don’t offer the modularity and practicality of the Olto. It’s available with a slew of accessories such as a kid carrier, storage bins, baskets, racks, and more. That’s a great combo of features and flexibility. We just hope regulation figures out how to allow things like the Olto without sentencing actual ebike riders to wearing motorcycle helmets and having ebike insurance while they’re on a greenway.

It’s a question that dates back decades. Do you option your fancy sports car with or without visual flourishes like rally or racing stripes? Once you choose, changing your mind isn’t exactly an easy task. Installing or removing stripes is a painstaking process on one’s own and can cost thousands when a professional does the work.

Porsche owners might not have to make that choice in the near future. A new patent would allow them to switch from stripes to no stripes with the push of a button.

More: Tesla Files New Seat Patent For A Supercar That’s Been Sitting Since 2017

According to the newly published patent application that was first spotted by Jalopnik, Porsche’s system would use an “actively controllable, optically variable coating” applied to exterior body panels. When voltage is applied, the coating changes appearance.

The company says the technology could rely on either so-called electronic paper or paramagnetic coatings, both of which can alter their color when electricity is introduced. This kind of tech already exists, but it’s not used in this fashion.

Plenty of automakers use it for glass panels which allows the occupant to make the glass appear transparent or opaque on command. The big change here is using it on a body panel instead. According to the patent, Porsche owners would see the “rally stripes” appear when the car goes into Sport mode. Additional accents could also light up around areas like the diffuser or the side blades behind the rear wheels.

An EV Battery Indicator Too

Porsche says the idea is partly cosmetic, but there is a functional side too. The company notes that racing stripes could help identify one car from another during competition, especially when multiple identical cars are on track at the same time. Porsche also believes the same coating could act as an exterior battery gauge on EVs.

Instead of opening an app or looking at the dashboard, owners could glance at the car and instantly know how much charge remains. A panel might glow green when the battery is nearly full, yellow when it is running low, and red when it is close to empty.

While there’s no way to know for sure if or when Porsche gives this idea the green light, it’s very much the kind of tech we see popping up more and more across the bleeding edge of the industry. Sooner or later, someone will probably put it into production. Here’s hoping Porsche makes it happen and lets other automakers license the tech.

Credit: WIPO / Porsche

Production of the Tesla Model S and Model X is ending with 350 Signature Edition cars. Each one gets a ton of perks and a premium price tag. On top of that, buyers have to agree not to sell for at least one year from delivery. Tesla has tried and failed to enforce this type of thing before. This time, it might have figured out the right levers to pull.

Buyers of the last-ever Signature Edition versions of the Model S Plaid and Model X Plaid will reportedly have to sign a strict no-resale agreement before taking delivery. According to the order documents spotted by Not A Tesla App, owners agree not to sell or even attempt to sell the vehicle within the first year after delivery. Breaking the agreement evidently makes owners subject to liquidated damages of $50,000 or however much profit they make, whichever is greater.

More: You’d Have To Be High To Pay $159,420 For Tesla’s Signature Editions

The move is clearly aimed at keeping speculators from immediately flipping the final 350 Signature Editions for huge profits. Tesla is only building 250 examples of the Model S and 100 of the Model X, each finished in exclusive Garnet Red paint with gold badging and unique trim. Tesla tried this with the Cybertruck and the entire scheme fell apart, aside from the brand allegedly blacklisting some customers.

The policy was met with immediate backlash. Owners argued Tesla was trying to control something they had already paid for, while others simply ignored the clause and listed their trucks anyway. Within months, Tesla quietly dropped the restriction as Cybertruck supply increased and the market cooled. This time around, there are some key differences.

Signature Edition Model S/X orders contain a No Resale Agreement.

Here is the document.

Additionally, here is the resale clause which states the Luxe Package does not transfer (this is not new) pic.twitter.com/CGB5QBJIL6

— The Cybertruck Guy (@cybrtrkguy) April 12, 2026

The new agreement is cleaner and potentially easier to enforce. Unlike the Cybertruck contract, which relied on vague “unforeseen reason” language, the Signature Edition version flatly says owners cannot “sell or otherwise attempt to sell” the car within a year.

Tesla also has a stronger case because these are truly limited: just 350 cars total, versus thousands of Cybertrucks. Most importantly, Tesla made the biggest perks like FSD, free Supercharging, and Premium Connectivity non-transferable. That means even after a year, the car is worth less to a second owner, reducing the incentive to flip it in the first place. Will that stop every buyer from selling within 12 months? We doubt it.

NEWS: Tesla has announced a Signature Edition Model S and Model X as a final goodbye for these two vehicles.

• Price: $159,420
• Only 250 Model S & 100 Model X Signature Editions will be built. All Plaid variants.
• Garnet Red exterior paint
• Matching Garnet Red Door… https://t.co/3FYGlbKEa2 pic.twitter.com/VA8NZN8Mht

— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) April 11, 2026

For something as expensive and high-tech as the Cadillac Lyriq, buyers probably expect a few software bugs here and there. Maybe a glitchy screen, a frozen app, or a charger that occasionally needs a second try. According to a new lawsuit against General Motors, some owners are dealing with something much worse: SUVs that suddenly become completely unusable.

A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington claims the Cadillac Lyriq suffers from widespread electrical, software, and battery-management issues that can leave the electric SUV unable to start, charge, or drive. In other words, the lawsuit alleges that some Lyriqs effectively become very expensive driveway ornaments, or, in tech terms, bricks. We doubt owners find much comfort in that, regardless of whatever styling drew them in.

More: Thousands Of Cadillac EVs Recalled Over A Feature Meant To Impress

According to the lawsuit seen by Carcomplaints, Washington resident Wendy Cochran and Florida resident Charlene Riddle both say their Lyriqs suffered what’s described as “catastrophic electrical system failure.” Riddle claims GM told her a software fix was required, but that no fix was available at the time. Cochran, meanwhile, says her SUV became unusable, leaving her with lost time, added costs, and a vehicle now worth less than she paid.

Importantly, the filling calls into question failures with the Lyriq’s electrical architecture, battery-management modules, software systems, and vehicle control networks. All of those systems have to constantly work with one another. The plaintiffs point out that if one fails, it can cascade throughout the rest of the system and effectively brick the car.

One important piece of the puzzle is that the lawsuit claims that GM was aware about this issue and put the cars on the market anyway. The lawsuit alleges that the company had access to pre-production testing, engineering reports, warranty claims, dealership repair records, and consumer complaints, all of which pointed to the same issue. Even so, GM allegedly continued marketing the Lyriq as a premium, reliable luxury EV.

At this point, the ball is in GM’s court. It can respond by denying the allegations or, more likely, it could ask the judge to dismiss the case altogether. Generally, the next move comes within three weeks of the initial filing so we should have more news on the case soon.

The current Nissan Leaf hasn’t even been out for a full year, and yet the company is already issuing a serious safety recall. 51 owners might have a car that could, in very specific circumstances, experience a thermal event. Put simply, the specific vehicles could catch fire, so Nissan is telling owners to take several safety precautions, including parking outside.

According to the recall, the issue traces back to the 78-kWh lithium-ion battery pack. During the supplier’s manufacturing process, the edge of a battery cathode may have been torn. If that damaged section folds over inside the cell, it can create an internal short circuit.

Read: 20,000 Nissan Leaf Owners Told To Stop Fast Charging After Fire Risk Warning

That’s where things get serious. Nissan says the short circuit could overheat the battery and potentially trigger what the company calls a “thermal event.” In other words, the battery could catch fire even when the car is parked, switched off, and not charging.

The first known incident happened in Japan on February 16, when a parked 2026 Leaf suffered a thermal event while sitting outside. A second case surfaced in the U.S. on March 2 at a Nissan dealership. In both cases, the vehicles were turned off and not plugged in.

That’s key because oftentimes, it’s the charging procedure itself that can initiate instances like this. Considering that these cars weren’t plugged in means owners could have zero indication of an issue before a fire erupts.

Nissan says it used telematics data to scan other Leafs for unusual battery behavior, then traced the suspect battery packs directly to specific VINs. The company says it has one-to-one traceability between the battery and each affected vehicle. Nissan stopped shipping potentially affected Leafs on March 17 and placed vehicles on hold at ports. Owners will begin receiving calls immediately, and interim recall letters will start going out on April 17.

Until then, Nissan says affected owners should park the car outside and away from structures, avoid charging it, and bring it to a dealer. Dealers will provide a rental car until a fix is ready. Once that happens, Nissan will replace the damaged battery modules, or the entire battery pack if necessary, free of charge.

Credit: Stephen Rivers for Carscoops

We’re in the third inning of a nine-inning game, says Ford’s CEO Jim Farley. What’s he talking about? Electric vehicle adoption. And the automaker has plenty coming down the pipeline before the game is over, he adds. Chief among those products is an affordable EV built to directly take on the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y.

Ford has spent the past few years insisting it still believes in EVs, even as it slashed programs, killed the F-150 Lightning, and pivoted hard toward hybrids. That shift is one that plenty of other automakers are also going through, but none seem to have the exact same game plan as the Blue Oval brand.

More: Farley Admits Ford Got The F-150 Lightning Wrong

“We really want to bet on all of it. We’re going to have an all-hybrid lineup. So Bronco… everything you can buy at Ford will have a hybrid. We’ll also have EREVs for towing. We’ll have an all-electric, affordable vehicle to compete with Model Y and Model 3,” Farley said during an appearance on the Spike’s Car Radio podcast.

That last part is the most notable. Ford already sells the Mustang Mach-E, a relatively affordable EV that offers similar benefits to the Model Y. At the same time, the Ford lags behind in several key metrics, including range, performance, charging speed, and more. Farley clearly wants to change that.

To that end, the brand is working on something new and unique. This future Model Y/Model 3 fighter will almost certainly ride on the company’s Universal EV Platform, or UEV, a new architecture developed by a secretive “skunkworks” team made up largely of former Tesla and Formula 1 engineers. According to Ford, the platform can support up to eight body styles, including compact crossovers, sedans, pickups, vans, and larger SUVs.

Ford’s first UEV-based model is expected to be a roughly $30,000 midsize electric pickup arriving in 2027. The Model 3 and Model Y rival would likely follow shortly after, potentially debuting later that year or in 2028.

Subaru has spent the past few years dabbling in EVs, but the Solterra always felt more like a compliance exercise than a serious attempt to challenge segment leaders. The new Trailseeker and Uncharted take the brand to new heights. Now, the Getaway, another EV built in partnership with Toyota, wants to add more passengers to the mix.

Read: Subaru Finally Connects Its Two Best Ideas In One Vehicle

Revealed at the New York Auto Show, the Getaway is Subaru’s first three-row EV and easily its boldest electric model yet. It’s also the most powerful production Subaru ever built, with dual electric motors producing a combined 420 hp (313 kW), which is a lot more than the Highlander’s 388 horses.

According to Subaru, that’s enough to send the family hauler from 0-60 mph in under five seconds, which means it’ll outrun plenty of sports sedans while carrying six or seven people and all of their luggage.

Three-Row Space And Practicality

From a design standpoint, it’s easy to see the clear ties to Toyota’s new Highlander EV, which, like the Getaway, will debut later this year. Subaru says its new three-row SUV offers 45.6 cubic feet of cargo room behind the second row.

That’s more than Kia’s EV9 manages. There’s also 15.9 cubic feet of space behind the third row, captain’s chairs or a bench seat in the second row, depending on trim, and allegedly enough headroom and legroom for six-foot adults in all three rows.

Inside, the Getaway gets a standard 14-inch infotainment display, a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, USB-C ports in every row, and available luxuries including ventilated seats, heated rear seats (including the third row), and a panoramic roof.

Also: Kia Finally Brings An Affordable EV To America, Fake Gears And All

Every Getaway comes standard with all-wheel drive, 8.3 inches of ground clearance, and the brand’s X-Mode system. The SUV can tow up to 3,500 pounds (1,588 kg). Power comes from a 95.8 kWh battery pack that Subaru says will deliver over 300 miles (483 km) of range. In 2027, a “standard-range” version will arrive with a 77 kWh battery pack, but Subaru didn’t release a range estimate for it.

The Getaway comes with a NACS charging point, which means that owners will have access to Tesla’s Supercharger network. The Getaway has a maximum charging speed of 150 kW, which is not very quick compared to most new EVs, but Subaru says it’ll go from 10 to 80 percent in around half an hour.

Expected Pricing Range

The biggest question at this point is what will pricing look like? For now, expect it to start at around the low-to-mid $50,000 range. That’s right in line with the Kia EV9 and a few thousand cheaper than the Hyundai Ioniq 9. Likely, the Getaway will also undercut the new Toyota Highlander by roughly the same margin.

Either way, we’ll know later this year, and Subaru will find out how big an appetite its fans have for what is likely the heaviest and somehow fastest production car it’s ever made.

Kia is one of the fastest-moving brands in the business. Now, a keen-eyed reader believes they’ve spotted something new, a model we’ve already seen overseas showing up much closer to home. The Korean automaker has brought an EV3 prototype across the Atlantic for testing in Mexico.

It’s unclear why Kia would still wrap it in camouflage given that it’s already made its global launch, but the move could point to plans for bringing the sub-compact electric crossover to North America.

Kia EV3 Review: Everything We Love About The EV9 Made More Affordable 

Despite the thick camouflage covering nearly every body panel, it’s easy to match the EV3 that’s already on sale elsewhere, including Europe. The short overhangs, upright stance, and boxy rear section are all visible, along with a high roofline that suggests Kia is prioritizing interior space over sleek styling.

Photos Silvia García / Carscoops

The test vehicle also appears to ride on aero-optimized wheels similar to those seen on other Hyundai Motor Group EVs, while the front end is completely hidden under padded covers designed to conceal the final lighting signature. The reader who snapped these photos, Silvia Garcia, told us that the same vehicle has been around town for at least a few days.

Read: Kia Unveils Four New GT Models With Speed, Minus The Drama

Testing there is especially interesting, as the country already builds several Kia and Hyundai models for global markets. Running prototypes in Mexico could simply be part of evaluating local road conditions. That said, it also lines up with the idea that Kia may be eyeing Canada for the EV3.

European specification Kia EV3

Kia initially focused the EV3 on overseas markets, including Europe. When it debuted in 2024, though, the company did confirm plans for a U.S. launch, targeting late 2025 or early 2026 with a starting price in the in the low-to-mid $30,000s. That, as you may have noticed, hasn’t happened, and nobody at Kia has said much since.

A lot has changed in the meantime: the $7,500 federal tax credit is gone, the American EV market has cooled considerably, and tariffs are making the whole equation messier by the day. The awkward part is that the appetite for affordable electric cars has never been stronger.

The EV3 is built on Kia’s E-GMP platform and is currently offered with two battery options, a 58.3 kWh Standard Range and a larger 81.4 kWh Long Range pack, both driving a single front-mounted motor producing 201 hp (150 kW). Depending on the battery, WLTP range is rated at up to 372 miles (599 km), while fast charging allows a 10 to 80% top-up in roughly 30 minutes under ideal conditions.

Back in January, Kia also pulled the covers off a hotter EV3 GT, this time with a more serious edge. It uses the larger battery and bumps output to 282 hp (215 kW / 286 PS), enough to cut the 0–62 mph (100 km/h) sprint down to a claimed 5.7 seconds.

Special thanks to Silvia García for the photos!

Analysts believe that Tesla is on track to double its global deliveries by the end of the decade. That’s a huge bet, and it relies on more factories, cheaper models, and a broader global footprint that can push annual volume into the millions. That said, there’s a bit of a disconnect. If that’s indeed what the future looks like, the same analysts’ Q1 2026 predictions aren’t exactly screaming momentum.

The automaker just compiled estimated reports from 23 big-time analyst firms, including UBS, Barclays, Wells Fargo, and more. Wall Street expects Tesla to deliver roughly 420,000 vehicles in Q1 2026. For a company evidently on the verge of explosive growth, that figure leaves some room for head-scratching because it’s nearly flat compared to 2025 levels.

More: This Might Be The Tesla Roadster’s Biggest Update Since 2017

That said, the professionals betting on the future clearly see a path ahead. Their consensus is that Tesla will deliver 1,689,691 cars this year. That’s actually just above the 1,636,129 figure it managed in 2025, with a a modest 3.3% increase year over year.

Starting in 2027, their estimates just go up, up, and away, though. Notably, 2027 is the latest year in which all 23 firms provided an estimate, in this case, of 1,880,496 deliveries.

Twenty of the firms predicted (on average) that Tesla will deliver 2,128,187 cars in 2028. Just 13 firms went as far as to provide a consensus for 2029 and 2030. Those figures hit 2,613,623 deliveries for 2029 and then 3,032,000 the following year.

As is the case now, analysts believe the vast majority of the cars that Tesla does sell will be the Model 3 and Model Y by a factor of around eight to one overall. Notably, that mix diminishes to as low as four to one by 2030 in the consensus.

That’s important because it suggests that Tesla will need to continue to heavily invest in the growth and proliferation of both the Model Y and Model 3. Those two will largely bolster the car side of Tesla’s business if this consensus is correct.

What it doesn’t clarify is what falls under those “other models.” With the Tesla Model S and Tesla Model X out of the picture, the lineup narrows quickly. That leaves the Tesla Cybertruck as the only other vehicle currently in play, alongside plans for the Tesla Cybercab and, if Elon Musk is to be taken at his word, something he has teased as “way cooler than a minivan.”

The decision to publish this consensus ahead of its Q1 report is also significant and Tesla has done this in the past. It could be that it’s hoping to anchor expectations if results end up lower than some hoped for.

For the past decade or so, the automotive industry has been marching steadily toward touchscreens and capacitive buttons, and the reasoning has always been the same: they look cleaner, they signal modernity, and they photograph well in press materials. At the same time, they’ve often proven harder to use in practice.

Now, one of the world’s most storied automotive names is admitting what many suspected all along: touch controls took over because they’re cheaper, not because they’re better.

According to Ferrari CEO Benedetto Vigna, the shift away from physical buttons has little to do with improving the driving experience and everything to do with manufacturing efficiency. “The touch [button] is something that is made for the supplier’s advantage… Making a touch button is cheaper — 50 percent cheaper.” He also made clear that the trend is not driven by customer preference or any inherent technological advantage.

More: Volkswagen Gives First Official Look At Golf MK9

That’s the blunt admission he made while speaking to Autocar India, and it lines up with what we’ve been hearing across the industry. Capacitive panels reduce parts count, simplify wiring, and allow manufacturers to reuse the same hardware across multiple models. They also eliminate the need to design, engineer, and validate bespoke physical switches for each function. In high-volume cars, those savings add up quickly. But even premium brands leaned into the trend, sometimes at the expense of usability.

Ferrari’s “Phygital” Philosophy

Ferrari, however, now says it’s going the other direction, especially for its first electric vehicle, the Luce, due out later this year. Instead of doubling down on screens, the company plans to bring back more physical switches, dials, and toggles, particularly for frequently used functions. This includes steering wheel controls and secondary systems such as climate settings, areas where tactile feedback can make a noticeable difference.

Vigna calls the approach “phygital,” a blend of physical and digital controls meant to keep the interface intuitive without giving up modern software features. That philosophy will appear in the upcoming EV, the interior of which, has already been revealed, giving us a first look at the new layout.

The Jony Ive Irony

What makes this particularly interesting is that the Luce has been developed with input from design consultancy LoveFrom, led by former Apple designer Jony Ive. That’s the man behind the original iPhone, a product that became historically significant in large part because of its deliberate absence of physical controls.

All said, Ferrari is far from alone in this new understanding of why physical controls are so important. Super-luxury brands like Rolls-Royce never fully departed from such controls. Mainstream brands like Hyundai and Volkswagen are also open about the need to eschew touch controls for physical ones. Now, we just have to wait to see how each company will implement those design briefs.