The M3 Touring and M5 Touring has convinced BMW to build more estates.
The new i3 will be the second model launched from its Neue Klasse family.
It will also spawn an all-electric M3 that’ll be sold along the ICE version.
As we had expected, the new all-electric Neue Klasse sedan from BMW will revive the i3 nameplate, but it’ll be unlike the original i3 unveiled way back in 2013. This model, conceived as a direct rival to the Tesla Model 3, will arguably be the most important vehicle in BMW’s new generation of EVs.
BMW has confirmed that it will kick off its long-awaited Neue Klasse era with the second-generation iX3 that’s been already previewed by a concept. After it launches, BMW will follow it up with the new i3. Interestingly, it won’t just be sold as a sedan, but will be available as a Touring estate as well.
During a recent interview with Autocar, BMW Group design boss Adrian van Hooydonk said that the popularity of the M3 Touring and M5 Touring has proven that there remains demand for vehicles like this.
“I think the ‘touring is making a comeback,” he said. “Of course, we’ve propelled it with the M3 Touring and M5 Touring: they seem to be very popular, even in countries where tourings or estates are traditionally not very [popular]. So yes, there is new wind in that segment, and we’re very happy about that.”
“SUVs are half of our business,” van Hooydonk continued. “The other half are still sporty, elegant sedans or coupés, and obviously we care about that as well. That’s what we’re rooted in, and we are often seen as the benchmark – and for sure we want it to stay that way.”
BMW product boss Bernd Körber added that the German brand will continue to reserve the ‘i’ badge for its EV models, noting it’s an important way to differentiate them from existing ICE offerings.
“Why the ‘i’? Because the i brand started out with more facets to it, but one element with the i3 and i8 was electrification,” he said. “So for us it’s a designator that we use to indicate within the common naming [strategy] that this is an electrified vehicle, with the ‘i’ in front of it. So we kept the ‘i’, put it in front and moved it from a kind of sub-brand to a model brand, and that will be the logic that we will follow from now on.”
The new BMW i3 is expected to include an entry-level, rear-wheel drive model with roughly 300 hp, while all-wheel drive versions will follow later. It’ll also spawn an all-electric version of the beloved M3, previewed earlier this year as the Vision Driving Experience. This model packs four electric motors.
Nissan is about to announce its biggest fiscal year loss.
The automaker is struggling to compete with Chinese rivals.
Last year, Nissan closed another production site in China.
Nissan is reportedly gearing up to end production at its plant in Wuhan, China, due to dwindling production of the Ariya and X-Trail, which are built there. This is bad news for the Japanese brand and comes just a few days after it was revealed it will soon announce its biggest ever financial year loss.
News of Nissan’s plans first came from a local Chinese outlet. It’s understood that annual production at the plant has only hit 10,000 units since operations commenced in 2022. That’s pretty terrible, particularly since the plant has the capacity to build as many as 300,000 vehicles annually. Nissan is currently leasing the site from Dongfeng Motor.
Nissan’s Chinese Sales Were Way Off Target
Reuters understands that stiff competition from Chinese companies is a key reason why production has never come close to reaching capacity.
This isn’t the only Nissan plant in China that’s under serious pressure. In June last year, it closed its plant in Changzhou due to the jump in sales of Chinese EVs and dwindling demand for imported vehicles. This site had been operating alongside Dongfeng Motor since November 2020 and had the capacity to build 130,000 vehicles annually.
Nissan’s Is Between A Rock And A Hard Place
Nissan is in dire straits at the moment. We’re only a few months removed from its planned merger with Honda falling apart, and on May 13, it’s gearing up to release its full earnings report for the fiscal year that ended in March.
Last week, the automaker said it expects to report a net loss of ¥700-750 billion ($4.91 – $5.26 billion) for the year, a huge increase from the ¥80 billion ($560 million) net loss it originally estimated.
Nissan is currently in survival mode and is implementing a massive restructuring. It has confirmed plans to cut 9,000 jobs, is closing plants, and has streamlined model lineups. It is also looking for a new partner, and could even join forces with Taiwanese tech giant Foxconn.
Nissan is currently in survival mode and is implementing a massive restructuring. It has confirmed plans to cut 9,000 jobs, is closing plants, and has streamlined model lineups. It is also looking for a new partner, and could even join forces with Taiwanese giant Foxconn.
Citroen has shown the production version of the new C5 Aircross SUV.
The model is available with fully electric, mild hybrid and PHEV options.
The interior gains new technology, alongside extra comfort and practicality.
Citroen has unveiled the new generation of the C5 Aircross, which remains faithful to the quirky design of the original concept while introducing new tech features – including the largest infotainment display ever offered by a Stellantis brand. The SUV improves the comfort and practicality credentials of its predecessor, and is now available with fully electric, mild-hybrid, and plug-in hybrid powertrain options.
The new C5 Aircross adopts the new face of Citroen, already seen on the latest C3, as well as in the refreshed C4, C4 X, and Berlingo. The body is more sculpted than before with a greater emphasis in the aerodynamics, in a quest to further improve efficiency. The wheels measure up to 20 inches in diameter, combined with a respectable ground clearance of 200 mm (7.9 inches).
Interestingly, the production model has retained the protruding LED taillights of the concept, infusing some French quirkiness into the family hauler. In fact, the only notable changes from concept to production are the more conventional door handles, and the thicker pillars.
In terms of footprint, the new C5 Aircross measures 4,652 mm (183.1 inches) long and has a 2,784 mm (109.6 inches) wheelbase, figures increased by 150 mm (5.9 inches) and 60 mm (2.4 inches) respectively compared to its predecessor.
The real surprise comes inside the “C-Zen Lounge” cabin. The slim floating center console features a 13-inch portrait-style infotainment screen, neatly paired with a row of physical buttons below it. The company said that this is “the largest central high-definition touchscreen ever offered by a Stellantis brand”, with fully customizable and fixed sections. This is an odd choice considering that Citroen is the budget-oriented brand of the Stellantis group.
There is also a 10-inch digital instrument cluster, a head-up display, wireless charging, ambient lightning, and a panoramic sunroof. A storage area with two cupholders are tucked in behind the touchscreen, with extra space for items in the central armrest and door bins. Overall, the interior looks clean, modern, and ready to make commuting slightly less of a chore.
Citroen designers used foam fabric for the dashboard, door cards, and seats, making the cabin feel like a cocoon. The signature Citroen Advance Comfort seats are more heavily cushioned than before, and are said to offer greater body support. The front seats are available with electric adjustments, heating, ventilating, and massaging functions, while the rear seats have reclining backrests and can be heated. However, the rear bench doesn’t have three separate seats like the previous generation, and has lost the sliding function.
According to the automaker, the larger footprint of the SUV allows more legroom and headroom for the rear passengers. The boot has also grown, with a capacity of 651 lt (23 cubic feet) not being affected from the powertrain type. Furthermore, there is a 75 lt (2.6 cubic feet) compartment under the boot floor, and another 40 lt (1.4 cubic feet) scattered around the cabin.
Platform and Powertrain Details
The new C5 Aircross rides on Stellantis’ STLA Medium architecture, the same platform underpinning the Peugeot 3008/5008, Opel Grandland, and DS No8. It will likely support the upcoming DS No7 too. These shared bones open the door for fully electric powertrains – a first for the nameplate – joining the mild-hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. All versions of the new C5 Aircross are automatic and drive the front wheels.
The e-C5 Aircross is available in two different versions with a single electric motor, missing out on the dual-motor powertrains of the Peugeot siblings. The Standard Range produces 207 hp (154 kW / 210 PS) and offers 323 miles (520 km) of range from a 73 kWh battery pack. The Extended Range produces 227 hp (169 kW / 230 PS) and can cover up to 422 miles (679 km) between charges thanks to a larger 97 kWh battery. In both cases, the maximum charging rate is 160 kW DC.
The entry-level C5 Aircross Hybrid 145 is probably the most interesting option for buyers. The carry-over turbo 1.2-liter three-cylinder engine is good for 134 hp (100 kW / 136 PS), with a 12 hp (9 kW) electric motor integrated in the six-speed dual-clutch automatic, sourcing energy from a 0.9 kWh battery.
Finally, there is the C5 Aircross Plug-in Hybrid 195 version. This is fitted with a turbo 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine and a single electric motor, producing a combined 193 hp (143 kW / 195 PS). Power is transmitted to the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. More importantly, the 21 kW battery pack provides an extended EV-only range of 53 miles (85 km).
As with its predecessor, the C5 Aircross has a Citroen-specific suspension with Progressive Hydraulic Cushions, promising a “magic carpet ride”. Finally, the available Drive Assist 2.0 pack enables Level 2 autonomous driving.
With the C5X fastback crossover on the way out once the current generation wraps up, the C5 Aircross is set to take over as Citroen’s flagship model. It is a logical, if not thrilling, evolution for the brand as it doubles down on practicality, comfort, and now, electrification.
The new Citroën C5 Aircross is set to launch in Europe in the second half of 2025. It will be produced at the Rennes plant in France, with pricing to be announced closer to the release date.
Tesla is working to bring a cheaper model to the market late this year or early in 2026.
A drone pilot flying over a Tesla factory might have spotted a development prototype.
The mystery car lacks doors and a roof, suggesting a prototype under early development.
Tesla has always had a flair for keeping people guessing, but sometimes even the best plans are no match for a drone and a zoom lens. New footage from above Tesla’s Fremont factory might have captured something the company would have preferred to keep under wraps for a little longer.
It is no secret that Tesla is racing to deliver a cheaper, more accessible car to market, as company officials, including Elon Musk himself, have already confirmed it. Now, it looks like a development prototype was spotted sitting in plain sight among several other vehicles, completely uncovered. The rumor mill is in overdrive, so let’s sort out what is fact and what might just be wishful thinking.
As pointed out by Teslarati, the drone video embedded below shows a vehicle that seemingly stands apart from Tesla’s current lineup. It sports a narrower roofline and a silhouette that leans toward crossover territory. That matches up with Tesla VP of Vehicle Engineering Lars Moravy’s recent comments during the Q1 2025 earnings call, where he mentioned that upcoming models would resemble the existing lineup while integrating features from Tesla’s next-generation platform.
“Models that come out in next months will be built on our lines and will resemble, inform, and shape the cars we currently make. And the key is that they’ll be affordable, and you’ll be able to buy one,” said Moravy. The company also said in its slide deck that “Plans for new vehicles, including more affordable models, remain on track for start of production in the first half of 2025.” Combine those statements with a new sighting, and we have something worth talking about.
Spotted by the YouTube channel Met God In Wilderness, the drone video shows two very interesting things. In one, we see the vehicle mentioned above. The strangest part isn’t just its size and shape; it might be missing a roof and doors. We know this new Tesla is supposed to be de-contented, but that’s a bit extreme.
In a second photo, we see several shells scattered in a lot. None of them have any body panels save for a hood here or there. None appear all that unique or special, but the pictures are a bit too grainy to be sure. It’s plausible that one or more is a redesigned prototype. That includes at least one with Falcon-wing door hinges.
Another shot shows a covered vehicle being moved from one part of the factory to another. There is no doubt Tesla is working on something. The real question is what that something actually is, and rumors suggest it could be a more basic version of the Model Y, possibly even a slightly smaller one.
Fremont, with a lot of speculation, definitely seems to be in the middle of something. pic.twitter.com/GDsFJeeusd
Since the announcement about a smaller, more affordable Tesla, people all over the world have guessed about what it would be. In China, where Tesla makes and sells a substantial percentage of its cars, social media accounts and news outlets say they know what’s coming. Dubbed “E80” internally, this new Tesla is basically a low-rent Model Y.
Rumors say it’ll have a 50-55 kWh battery pack, smaller tires, no panoramic glass roof, cloth upholstery, fewer speakers, and fewer amenities. That includes things like ambient lighting, heated seats, and acoustic glass to keep outside noise… outside. Frankly, all of that makes a lot of sense from Tesla’s standpoint. Sure, its lineup is looking a bit dated as a whole, but if it can bring a low-cost Model Y to market for, say, $30,000, consumers will likely take note.
CN Sourcing:
There will be a new type of Model Y upcoming, internal code E80.
Let’s finish this off with a boatload of salt. There’s no way to be sure about what we’re seeing here. Not only is the camera footage very brief, but it’s also so far away that it’s tough to confirm anything. What’s clear is that the images here, combined with Tesla’s words about future cars, make the timing seem like too good of a coincidence. Is this the Model 2 or whatever else Tesla calls it? Does it look like something different to you? Let us know in the comments below.
Tesla could lose its right to sell directly to consumers in New York state.
Lawmakers want to recall five sales licenses previously granted to Tesla.
Disgust at Elon Musk, not Tesla, is behind the move by Sen. Patricia Fahy.
The state of New York is one of the most pro-electric areas in the US, but its residents could soon find it much harder to buy America’s most popular EVs. A new bill proposes ending Tesla’s license to sell directly in the state, which could mean the brand losing access to its existing showrooms.
New York has for over 10 years outlawed direct selling, demanding all automakers sell through franchised dealers. But when that law passed in 2014 it contained an exemption for Tesla, giving it the right to continue operating five retail outlets it was already selling from. Now lawmakers want to pull those five permits and offer them to other EV companies, and not for anything Tesla has done, but due to the actions of its CEO, Elon Musk.
New York State Sen. Patricia Fahy (Dem) described Musk to the New York Times as “part of an administration that is killing all the grant funding for electric vehicle infrastructure, killing wind energy, killing anything that might address climate change.”
“Why should we give [Tesla] a monopoly?” Fahy, the co-sponsor of the bill, asked.
Musk helped bankroll President Trump’s successful bid to return to the White House, and in Fahy’s eyes set back efforts to combat climate change. And the Telsa boss’s controversial job-slashing efficiency drive and push to access IRS information with DOGE has hardly endeared himself to New York’s lawmakers.
In addition to rescinding Tesla’s showroom licenses, and opposing the establishment of a new one at Colonie, Democrats want the state to audit a deal that allowed the automaker to run a plant near Buffalo on a $1 per year lease and receive almost $1 billion in benefits. They want the subsidies returned and for those managing the state and city pension funds to get rid of any investments in Tesla.
If Tesla is forced from its retail stores, buyers would have to travel out of state to get their new cars, though the brand would still maintain a NY presence in the form of showrooms that allow people to see and sit in the company’s EVs but not actually place an order. The five stores that Tesla currently has could be offered to rival brands including Lucid, Rivian and Scout.
Alfa Romeo’s next-gen Stelvio will debut later this year with electric and hybrid options.
The premium SUV will be a clean-sheet design, with fresh styling and more technology.
Quadrifoglio might keep the outgoing model’s twin-turbo V6 for a performance edge.
The clock is ticking for the debut of the second-generation Alfa Romeo Stelvio, expected later this year, and not a moment too soon. The current model has been showing its age for a while now, and a fresh update in design, technology, and an EV powertrain option is exactly what it needs.
Although Alfa Romeo has yet to release official images, we have already gotten a glimpse of the new SUV through patent filings. Now, independent renderings are giving us an even better idea of what to expect from the next-generation Stelvio’s exterior.
The illustrations come courtesy of digital artists Theophilus Chin and Nikita Chuyko for Kolesa, both well-known for producing impressively accurate previews of upcoming production models. Their latest work is based on earlier spy shots and recent patent drawings, with a few creative touches of color added in.
A Familiar Face with Sharper Features
The new Italian SUV represents a noticeable evolution from its predecessor, but the scudetto grille and updated graphics ensure it is still unmistakably an Alfa Romeo. Up front, split lighting units feature slim daytime running lights and main headlights tucked neatly within triangular bumper intakes. The revised grille also clears enough space for a centered license plate, borrowing a trick from the smaller Alfa Romeo Junior.
Along the sides, the Stelvio looks more refined. A sleeker roofline, bi-tone paint treatment, large alloy wheels, and flush door handles pull the design closer to the coupe-SUV territory without going full fastback. Around the back, the standout feature is the full-width LED taillights that form a triangular shape and stretch partially into the tailgate, echoing the look of the front grille.
The two artists approached the task slightly differently. Kelsonik updated his earlier renderings for Kolesa, refining the design with more accurate details sourced from the leaked patent filings. Theottle, meanwhile, kept a few differences but nailed the proportions, basing his interpretation on the mechanically related Jeep Wagoneer S platform.
The next generation Alfa Romeo Stelvio will share the STLA Large underpinnings with the Jeep Wagoneer S, Recon, and Dodge Charger, allowing it to be compatible with fully electric and hybrid powertrains. This change means that Maserati will be the final brand clinging to the Giorgio platform that originally debuted with the outgoing Giulia and Stelvio models.
Initial reports suggested that the high-performance Stelvio Quadrifoglio would go fully electric, but more recent information points to the twin-turbo 2.9-liter V6 sticking around. That is probably a good thing for Alfa Romeo loyalists who appreciate a bit of mechanical drama under the hood. With any luck, the new Stelvio will also inherit some of the outgoing model’s excellent chassis tuning, which helped make it one of the most engaging SUVs to drive.
The official reveal of the new Stelvio is expected within the next few months. It will sit above the Junior and Tonale in Alfa Romeo’s growing SUV lineup. As for the next Giulia, it is reportedly scheduled to arrive in 2026, possibly trading its traditional sedan shape for a more crossover-style, fastback design.
A modified Cybertruck sold for $78K, surpassing the price of a new one.
Changes to the Cybertruck include a satin black wrap, and the CyberTent.
Some fancy and colorful LED lighting has been added to the truck’s cabin.
Owning a new Tesla might not carry the same futuristic mystique it once did, but for plenty of buyers, the dream is still alive and well, especially when it involves the polarizing, attention-grabbing Cybertruck.
While the electric pickup has not sold as well as Tesla had hoped, there are still plenty of Americans who still want to get their hands on one. For many, buying directly from Tesla’s website is the easiest option, but the used market is starting to offer some interesting alternatives. Plenty of low-mileage Cybertrucks are already available, and while most sellers are taking a big hit compared to MSRP, there are a few exceptions — even if they mostly just prove the rule.
Last week, a particularly well-specced and modified example traded hands for $78,000 on Cars & Bids. At first glance, that is a very solid result for the seller, especially considering it is possible to buy a brand-new Cybertruck Dual-Motor AWD directly from Tesla for a little over $72,000 after the $7,500 federal EV tax credit.
So, why did this Cybertruck sell for more than a new one? Well, it has several tasteful (and costly, at least for the seller) modifications that seem to have appealed to the many interested bidders. For starters, the controversial stainless steel panels now sport a satin black paint protection film, transforming the look of the Tesla. That alone likely set the seller back around $3,000 to $5,000.
Photos Cars&Bids
Elsewhere, there’s an LED light bar on the roof, aftermarket running boards, official Tesla roof bars and mud flaps, and some interesting cladding on the tailgate. It even includes the optional $2,975 Tesla CyberTent, making it ideal for some camping adventures (as long as you’re not too far away from a charger…).
Plenty of changes have been made to the cabin, too. For example, the central infotainment screen now sits on a swivel mount, meaning it can be angled towards the driver. The underside of the glass roof has also been tweaked and now sports colorful LED lights. According to the listing, the windows have been tinted too, a job that likely cost several hundred dollars.
Generally speaking, as we have seen countless times in the used car market, modifying a car does not add to its value. But clearly, the winning bidder was happy to spend more on this example than the going rate for a new one.If they were already planning to add these upgrades, which look like they cost nearly $10,000 on top of the MSRP, then maybe it makes a little more sense , but calling it a solid deal would be a stretch.
The new Mazda EZ-60 shares its platform with the Deepal S07 from Changan.
Mazda has so far only announced specifications for the range-extender version.
It uses a range-extender powertrain with a 1.5-liter engine and 255 hp electric motor.
Many legacy carmakers have struggled to keep pace with Chinese startups and their innovative new EVs. However, earlier this week, Mazda revealed an electric SUV known as the EZ-60, and it’s already garnered quite a lot of attention in the country. It is also proving to be a hit with customers, with more than 10,000 pre-orders placed within just 48 hours of its debut.
The EZ-60 is unlike any Mazda sold elsewhere. Technically, it is not even a full-blooded Mazda. Thanks to a partnership with Changan, the SUV rides on the same platform as the Deepal S07, one of the latest electric models to roll out of China. It is a clear example of Mazda adapting to a fast-changing market, even if it means leaning on local expertise to do it.
As reported by CarNewsChina, Mazda secured 10,060 pre-orders for the EZ-60 in the two days since its unveiling. This comes despite the fact that the SUV has so far only been showcased in range-extender form and details about the battery-electric version have yet to be announced.
However, one shouldn’t mistake pre-orders for actual sales. For starters, shoppers are in no way obligated to follow through with purchasing the car. Additionally, pre-orders can be placed for just 10 yuan, the equivalent of just $1.40. Not all people who did will go through and buy it, but that’s the norm in the industry anyway – only the percentage varies in each case.
Mazda may be borrowing a Chinese platform, but the EZ-60 looks every bit like a Mazda should. That is important because it will not be limited to China. In other markets, including Europe and possibly Australia, it will be sold as the CX-6e. Unfortunately, if you are in the United States, you are out of luck, because there are no plans to bring it here.
The range-extender version of the EZ-60 presented at the Shanghai Auto Show has a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder that acts as a generator for the 31.7 kWh battery, which drives a 255 hp electric motor at the rear axle. As mentioned, Mazda has yet to reveal specifications of the all-electric version, and it’ll be interesting to see how buyers react to that one.
A well-preserved 1999 Ford Ranger pickup truck will be sold at auction in May.
It’s a single-cab XLT model powered by a 117hp 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine.
Despite being 26 years old, it has fewer than 52,000 miles on the odometer.
If we had a buck for each startup that shows up and states it intends to build the Holy Grail of the current automotive market, a truly affordable EV, only to either go the way of the dodo or fail to deliver on their promises, we’d probably be so rich we could afford to, well, launch our own startup. The latest in this long line is Slate, with its “Truck”.
It’s key selling point is that it’s a back-basics single-cab pickup with a super affordable price starting under $28,000, or around $20,000 with EV incentives that President Trump hasn’t axed (yet) despite being openly against them.
Even if Slate’s pickup truck does hit the market exactly as promised, you don’t need to read the fine print to realize that its EV is affordable not because they’ve found a secret sauce, but due to it being laughably basic. So much so that it lacks not just most of the features we’ve come to expect as standard, but also things like electric windows, an audio system, speakers, and an infotainment screen. You can pay extra to add them in, but at that point, aren’t you just defeating the whole “affordable EV” idea?
Or, You Know, Just Get a Ranger
If all you really want is a cheap single-cab truck with the minimum comfort creatures, here’s a used Ford Ranger for you. Not the current model, which is far from basic and definitely not an EV from a startup, but a classic, third-generation 1999 Ranger XLT, which is set to cross the Mecum auction block on May 15.
Sure, it’s 26 years old, powered by a 2.5-liter combustion engine, and you still have to crank the windows with your hands, but hey, it’s got stuff. Not exactly luxury, but it’s hardly a bare-bones, dollar store special either. It sports an automatic transmission, power steering and brakes, air conditioning, alloy wheels, a soft bed cover, chrome grille and bumpers.
But wait, there’s more! This truck also gets a radio (yes, with speakers), a center console arm rest, cupholders and, brace yourself EV startup defenders, a glovebox! You know, basic human comforts you won’t find in the Slate EV unless you pay extra for the “luxury”.
Moreover, it has a much more useful range than the base Truck’s lame 150 miles that can be increased to 240 miles (if you pay more), a max payload and towing capacity that exceed the Truck’s 1,400 lbs (635 kg) and 1,000 lbs (453 kg), respectively, is built by a legacy automaker, has sold in great numbers so parts are readily available, and despite its age, the odo reads just 51,645 miles.
So, if you’re after a cheap, no-nonsense single-cab truck, don’t worry; you’ve got options. You just won’t find them wrapped in the shiny, buzzword-heavy startup hype that’s always promising to change the world. But hey, if you’re into solid, reliable trucks without the drama, check out the listing over here.
Some EVs may become collectible in the next couple of decades due to their historical impact.
Hypercars like the Rimac Nevera and even everyday EVs could earn collectible status over time.
This may happen to all kinds of electric cars, from the Nissan Leaf to the Porsche Taycan.
It’s hard to believe, but it’s been over 100 years since electric vehicles first made their appearance on the streets. Sure, they disappeared almost as quickly as they arrived, but here we are today, witnessing their dramatic comeback. Over the past decade, EVs have evolved in leaps and bounds, bringing us to a question we can’t help but ask: which of these modern electric rides will one day be considered collectible in, say, 20 years from now?
To be clear, there are a few rare and historic EVs that already have their place in the collectible world. Jay Leno, for instance, famously owns a 1909 Baker Electric, which he’s even gone so far as to upgrade. But aside from these niche classics, the broader EV market isn’t exactly seen as a treasure trove for collectors, at least not yet. But who knows? Maybe the next wave of electric vehicles will change that.
The original Tesla Roadster 2.5 that kicked off things for Elon Musk’s brand could be a prime example. While it’s easy to point out its shortcomings, from range anxiety to questionable build quality, the Roadster was undeniably ahead of its time. It played a pivotal role in kick-starting the EV revolution, and without it, the Model S, and arguably the entire Tesla brand, may not have existed. It may not have been perfect, but it was a game-changer.
And while we’re talking about Tesla, let’s not overlook the other contenders that could one day find themselves in the collectible spotlight. The Model S, for one, completely shattered preconceived notions about what an electric car could be.
Then there’s the Model Y, Tesla’s best-seller, which has arguably played the most significant role in broadening EV adoption worldwide. And let’s not forget the Cybertruck. Love it or hate it, its design makes it impossible to ignore, cutting through a sea of otherwise similar-looking vehicles.
Of course, it’s not all about Tesla. The Nissan Leaf deserves a mention as one of the most influential EVs in shaping the electric car market, especially for those seeking an affordable option. The Rivian R1T was the first all-electric pickup truck. The original Porsche Taycan might be the first sign to everyone that even huge historic brands were willing to ditch internal combustion to one degree or another.
If I personally had to pick one, it would be the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. It seems poised to go down in history as the first EV to truly mix in a boatload of driver engagement along with supercar-like performance. Looking back through history, those two factors rarely come together in a EV that the general public can actually afford. That’s what makes the 5 N so special.
And while some traditional gearheads might scoff at the very idea of electric cars ever being collectible, let’s not forget that there’s a new generation on the horizon. This group won’t have the same hang-ups. They’ll have grown up with electric vehicles as the norm and they won’t carry the same biases against them.
Do you agree with anything we’ve mentioned here? Perhaps you have another car to submit. Let us know in the comments below!
A Cybertuck Foundation Series was bought by Edmunds last July for a long-term test.
After 5 months of issues, the Cybertruck was hit by a compact sedan while parked.
Tesla’s service centers took two months to provide a quote, declaring the EV a total loss.
When it comes to testing high-profile vehicles, sometimes things go terribly wrong, and in the case of Edmunds’ Tesla Cybertruck, ‘terribly’ is putting it mildly. In July 2024, the outlet shelled out $101,985 for a brand-new Cybertruck Foundation Series to add to its One-Year Road Test fleet. By December 11, the truck was struck by a compact sedan while parked, pushing the 6,600-pound electric vehicle onto the curb. The damage was severe enough that it was written off entirely.
On the outside, the wheel, tire, stainless steel panel and bumper bore the brunt of the impact. Things were much more serious under the skin though as, apart from the suspension, the rear drive motor, the rear-wheel steering setup, and lots of other parts were wrecked. No doubt, it was in a very sorry state, but things weren’t exactly peachy before the crash either.
Early Troubles: A Red Flag Parade
In fact, problems began soon after Edmunds took delivery of its Cybertuck and they included a number of critical steering failures, the EV going on limp mode or dying altogether, lots of errors showing up on the screen, the a/c not working on hot days, the transmission not selecting Park… you get the picture.
Definitely not confidence-inspiring for a $100k truck, no matter how hyped up it might be. In fact, the issues were so many they didn’t allow the team to perform its usual instrument testing procedure or even take it off-road.
The Great Repair Odyssey
Nevertheless, what spelled its demise was the aforementioned accident and attempts to get it fixed. Body shops dared not touch the Cybertruck, so their only recourse was Tesla‘s own service network. Problem number one: while one would expect Los Angeles, the city with the most Cybertrucks in the world, to have quite a few, there were just two within a 50-mile radius that were certified by Tesla to fix the EV’s steel body panels.
The first one, in Huntington Beach, gave them a one-month waiting period just to get an estimate on how much repairing it would cost. That was not all, though; they had to wait another six months for it to get fixed, which meant towing it to the shop to get an estimate, then towing it back and storing it somewhere, and finally towing it back again to get it back in working order. Naturally, Edmunds declined the offer.
Things were much better at the second certified service center in Ontario. They still had to wait a month for an estimate, but after that the shop would instantly start working on the truck. So far, so good – until Tesla called a few days before the appointment and informed them it was pushed back a month due to the shop being overbooked.
Cybertruck Repair Costs
Stripes and moldings: $619
Motors and components: $4,191 (including $3,000 for an EV drive unit)
Motor mounts: $77
Wheels and parts: $1,758
Steering: $2,040
Rear suspension: $9,149 (including $2,500 for a new suspension crossmember)
Cab and components: $3,800 (including $3,240 for a high-strength steel frame)
Bed: $8,762.79 (including $1,595 for the outer panel, $4,280 for the aluminum rear section and $1,055 for the bed floor)
Tailgate: $2,495
Rear bumper: $2,417.73
Rear body, lamps and floor plan: $1,668.50 (including $800 for the inner taillamp assembly)
Miscellaneous parts: $357.22
Other parts: $5
Paint and materials: $610
Tax on parts and materials: $3,320.65
Labor: $16,584
Sublet repairs: $25
Grand total: $57,879.89
This time they decided to wait and, two months after the accident, had an estimate: it would cost them $1,128 to disassemble the truck and find out what had to be replaced or repaired. The quote, though, was a very unpleasant surprise; all in, they had to pay exactly $57,879.89.
The list of things that had to be fixed was too long, and the single most expensive item on it was the rear suspension at $9,149. Given that an example without prior damage was valued at $86,160, so theirs would sell for much less, it made no financial sense to proceed with repairs and it was considered a total loss.
The Final Blow
In the end, the outlet sold their Cybertruck to Copart for… $8,000! The only positive thing was that it received praise for its performance and ride comfort, as well as the design that, while controversial, at least (or rather because of it) drew a lot of attention. Other than that, not only did it not get to take part in the One-Year Road Test, but it became Edmunds’ biggest loss ever, a title that until then was held by the Fisker Ocean.
Jeff Bezos-backed Slate revealed its $28k modular EV yesterday.
The bare-bones truck has manual windows and a 150-mile range.
An optional truck top turns the two-seat pickup into an five-seat SUV.
With so many modern cars feeling like clones of each other, featuring similar designs and often identical powertrains, it’s only normal that we’d get excited when something really different comes along. But in the case of Slate’s new EV, is that lust for the new is at risk of creating a real Emperor’s New Clothes situation?
If you haven’t seen our report on the Slate’s debut you should check out our original story at the link below this paragraph. But here’s the tldr: Slate is Michigan-based startup backed by Amazon’s Jeff Bezos that wants to sell affordable electric utility vehicles.
They’ll cost from $27,500 ($20k after federal tax credits) and a modular design means you’ll be able to turn the two-seat truck into a two-row SUV or an SUV with a coupe back or open roof with an add-on pack.
Both of those are real selling points. Most of the few electric utilities around, like Rivian’s R1S and R1T and those coming soon from Scout, cost over $50k putting them out of the reach of many American buyers. It’s great to see an automaker building a simple, no-frills truck that doesn’t cost the earth and doesn’t take up two parking bays, and the ability to switch between pick-up and SUV configurations really adds to the practicality.
Small price, smaller equipment list
But a ton of compromises have been made to hit the sub-$30k price. Most obviously, the list of standard equipment makes a Dacia look like a Maybach. There’s no touchscreen – which is not necessarily a bad thing, because we’ve all got smartphones and it means you get physical rotary controls for the AC.
But there’s not even any kind of stereo/speakers fitted as standard to play music from your phone. They’re optional, along with the wrap you’ll need to apply to change the body color since there are no paint options because there’s no paint.
And the crank windows? The internet went wild over this, but it’s a classic case of “brown, manual, diesel wagon” syndrome, and the fun factor will quickly wear off the first time you need to yell to your kids that they forgot their lunch box at school drop-off, or ask someone for directions through the passenger window because you’ve got no phone signal for Google Maps and there’s no onboard nav.
The 1,000 lbs (545 kg) towing capacity is also terrible for a utility vehicle, the 5 ft (1.52 m) bed length’s 0.5 ft (150 mm) advantage over a Ford Maverick comes at the expense of rear seats, and the lack of an all-wheel drive variant hurts its appeal to those who live in rural areas or get harsh winters. And the smaller of the two available batteries only has a 52.7 kWh capacity and gives a range of just 150 miles (240 km).
Short battery range
That range might be fine for a truck that never strays far from its home city, but we know from Mazda’s MX-30 sales failure that people don’t like EVs that can’t go far on a charge. And though you can pay for a bigger 84.3 kWh pack that’ll give you 240 miles (386 km), that’s probably going to push you well north of $30k (before credits), and by the time you’ve added the SUV top, a wrap, Bluetooth speakers and other personalization options your bargain truck isn’t going to be quite as much of a bargain.
I really want to get behind the Slate. I hate that cars have become so heavy and overcomplicated and this feels like the wheeled equivalent of my Suri toothbrush, which doesn’t have any fancy functions you never need like stupid Bluetooth apps, but is well built and lasts for weeks on a charge. Slate’s focus on simplicity, only giving us the stuff we need and none of what we don’t is refreshing, and one other automakers constantly adding pointless gadgets to get our attention could learn from.
Will internet praise equal sales?
But as Toyota discovered with the GR86, there’s a big difference between getting a bunch of people excited about the idea of a simple, pure-of-spirit vehicle, and getting them to actually buy it. Once the Slate launch dust has settled and the novelty of the crank windows and very bare, very plasticky interior and configurable roof (where are you gonna store it?) has faded and the trucks are available to buy, will Americans open their wallets?
Or will they decide that it’s simply too compromised, too basic and there are better options for similar money.
And maybe for less money if the EV tax credits advantage disappears (it’s already not available to all buyers). Those other options, like the $24k Ford Maverick with an aftermarket Leer truck cap for that SUV feel, aren’t stylish like Slate’s Truck, and they’re not electric, but they’re great products. And is anyone in America really crying out for an electric pickup right now, anyway?
Slate thinks it’ll sell 150,000 every year, and we hope it does, but how do you rate its chances? Is it a credible truck and really the game-changing bargain some people are making it out to be, or is it just massively over-hyped, still too expensive and about five years too early? Leave a comment and let us know.
If you have been paying even half-attention to the electric vehicle scene lately, you know that competition is heating up fast, with new challengers trying to swipe the crown from established players. We recently spent time behind the wheel of the Seres 5, a fully electric SUV from China with premium aspirations. However, besides the main review, we wanted to see how well it stacks up against its biggest competitor, the Tesla Model Y, so we organized a quick head-to-head comparison between the two.
The Seres 5 may have launched in Europe in 2024, but the Chinese version has been around since 2019. Unfortunately, at the time we had the Seres in our hands, Tesla was not offering test drives of the new Juniper in Greece, only the pre-facelift Model Y. Still, it makes for an interesting comparison, even if we have to keep in mind the changes introduced with the updated Tesla.
Both EVs share similar dimensions and come with dual electric motors, all-wheel drive capability, and large battery packs. The Tesla boasts 51 kilometers (32 miles) of extra WLTP range, but the Seres fights back with 193 hp more power. You can check out the detailed specs in the table below.
QUICK FACTS
Model
Seres 5 AWD 80 kWh
2024 Tesla Model Y LR AWD
Powertrain
dual-motor AWD
dual-motor AWD
Output
577 hp (430 kW / 585 PS) 940 Nm (693 lb-ft)
384 hp (286 kW / 389 PS) 510 Nm (376 lb-ft)
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph)
4.2 seconds*
5.0 seconds*
Top Speed
124 mph (200 km/h)
135 mph (217 km/h)
Battery
80 kWh
75 kWh
Range (WLTP)
482 km (300 miles)*
533 km (331 miles)*
Length
185.4 inches (4,710 mm)
187 inches (4,751 mm)
Width
76 inches (1,930 mm)
75.6 in (1,920 mm)
Height
63.8 inches (1,620 mm)
63.9 in (1,624 mm)
Wheelbase
113.2 inches (2,875 mm)
113.8 in (2,891 mm)
Weight
5,203 lbs (2,360 kg)*
4,528 lbs (2,054 kg)*
Price
€57,500 ($62,200)**
(inventory)
*Manufacturer, **Prices in Greece, including EV subsidies
SWIPE
Design: The Seres 5 Looks More Intriguing
Looks are subjective, sure, but a comparison would be incomplete without a design face-off. Beyond the exterior styling, we also factored in the cabin, where the Seres quietly pulls ahead.
Both models merge crossover and coupe cues, aiming for a sweet spot between aerodynamics and practicality. Parked side by side, the Tesla Model Y simply looks less interesting. Blame it partly on the fact that it resembles a bloated Model 3, although Tesla did address that with the recent mid-lifecycle update. It also does not help that Model Ys have become about as common as pigeons in a park.
That said, the rear end of the Model Y still looks cleaner and more cohesive than the Seres 5’s. While the Seres will not win any beauty pageants, it turns more heads and looks a bit more premium. It could definitely borrow a few styling updates from the related Aito M5, but even without them, it feels fresher than Tesla’s overfamiliar form.
Inside, most new EVs have taken a page from Tesla’s playbook: a big touchscreen, minimal physical controls, and a focus on being “modern” by removing everything people actually liked about buttons. The Seres 5 sticks to that formula but executes it better, with nicer materials, thoughtful color combinations, and a stylish center console. Plus, it offers a digital instrument cluster and a heads-up display, which make it easier for drivers migrating from more traditional cars.
However, while standard equipment of the Seres is pretty generous, Tesla’s tech and interface feel more modern, thanks to the continuous over-the-air software updates.
Practicality: The Tesla Model Y Prevails
While the Seres 5 offers a fancier interior, the Tesla wins when it comes to space for both people and cargo. Despite its sloping roofline, the Model Y offers more rear headroom and legroom, making it easier to climb in and out.
Cargo space is also firmly in Tesla’s favor. Officially, the Model Y can swallow 29 cubic feet (822 liters) in the rear boot and another 4.1 cubic feet (114 liters) in the frunk. Tesla’s habit of measuring up to the roof inflates those numbers a bit, but the advantage remains clear.
The Seres 5 has a boot capacity rating of 13 cubic feet (367 lt), with the frunk contributing another 2.4 cubic feet (67 lt). In reality, the difference with the Tesla is not that huge, but it is noticeable. Overall, I found the Model Y to be more suitable for family use, especially if you add the convenience of the longer driving range and the faster DC charging capabilities (250 kW compared to 100 kW).
Ride Comfort: The Seres 5 Feels Like An Electric Grand Tourer
Driving the two EVs back to back made it clear that the Seres 5 has the most comfortable and refined ride. The plush suspension absorbs road imperfections in a nicer way than the Tesla which can feel harsh in comparison.
The Seres also has a smoother power delivery – especially in the EV and Comfort modes – rounding up it’s friendly road manners. Furthermore, the cabin of the Seres is a bit more quiet, although we didn’t get the chance to test both vehicles on longer journeys on the highway.
Driving Dynamics: The Tesla Is Sportier And Feels Faster (But Isn’t)
While the majority of EV buyers are not interested in sporty driving manners, we had to include this segment allowing the differences in the character of the two models to shine.
On twisty roads, you’ll have more fun in the Tesla than in the Seres. It’s steering is a more direct, and the chassis setup feels sharper than your average family-oriented SUV or crossover. The softer and comfort-focused suspension of the Chinese EV results in more body roll compared to the more balanced setup of its well-established rival.
Another thing I noticed, is that despite being less powerful and slightly slower on paper (0-62 mph in 5.o seconds compared to 4.2 seconds), the Tesla feels quicker than the Seres, providing snappier acceleration from standstill. Thanks to all these and a more rear-biased AWD setup, the Model Y is more eager to be pushed, thus being the better option for spirited driving.
Pricing: It’s Hard To Beat The Tesla
In Greece, where we tested these cars, the facelifted Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD starts at €52,990 ($58,100), or €43,990 ($48,200) with incentives. Inventory models of the outgoing version can be had for even less, starting at €48,940 ($53,600).
Meanwhile, the Seres 5 costs €57,500 ($63,000) including incentives. This means the Seres commands a €13,510 ($14,800) premium over a new Model Y Juniper, with similar specs. The gap widens further if you consider the older inventory units.
Verdict: Tesla Keeps Its Crown… For Now
The Seres 5 is an impressive EV, especially when you consider that it is the brand’s first production model, but Tesla’s best-seller is really hard to beat in its own game. Our comparison showed that the Seres has a more comfortable ride and a nicer interior, but the Tesla is more practical, has sharper driving dynamics, and is significantly more affordable.
Overall, the outgoing Tesla Model Y still feels like a well-rounded option for prospective EV buyers. However, the competitive pricing of the updated Model Y Juniper makes it a no-brained, having corrected many of it’s predecessor’s flaws.
We’ll be eager to test more Tesla Model Y rivals from China in the future, although the biggest threat to the EV’s success appears to the global backslash against the company’s CEO, Elon Musk. This appears to be the main reason behind a significant decline in Tesla sales in Europe, with EV buyers turning their backs to the once-dominant brand.
Tesla Model S leads used car depreciation with a 17.2 percent annual value loss.
Ford Explorer, BMW 5-Series, and Maserati Levante also suffered steep declines.
Porsche Taycan owners lost an average of $13,422 over the past twelve months.
It is no secret that car values have been riding a rollercoaster lately, but some models have taken a particularly rough plunge. In the past year alone, a surprising number of popular vehicles have shed thousands of dollars in value, offering a clear look at changing market dynamics.
Four Tesla models are among the top 20 used cars in the United States that depreciated the most over the past 12 months. However, Tesla is hardly alone in this honor, as several other mainstream and premium brands, including Ford, BMW, Mercedes, Hyundai, Lincoln, and Genesis, have also seen significant price drops.
The team from iSeeCars recently analyzed the prices of 1.4 million used vehicles over the past year to determine which ones have been hit the hardest. At the top of the list sits the Tesla Model S, which depreciated by an average of 17.2 percent year-over-year, representing a fall of $9,944. As of March 2025, the average listing price for a Model S was $47,931. This, perhaps, is not much of a shock considering the electric sedan has been around for 13 years and Tesla has faced its share of public relations headaches in the last few months, adding to its woes.
A Closer Look at the Biggest Losers
Trailing just behind the Model S is the Porsche Taycan, which dropped by an average of $13,422 over the past year, or about 15.1 percent. Meanwhile, the Ford Explorer Hybrid saw its average price fall by 14.1 percent to $31,228, and the BMW 5-Series Hybrid was not far behind, dropping 13.9 percent to $34,375.
The second Tesla to appear on the list is the Model Y. The study from iSeeCars shows that prices of it have fallen by an average of 13.1% to $30,611. This places it two positions ahead of the Model 3 in eighth, with prices dropping by 10.9% to $26,084. In 17th position was the Model X, with reported average price falls of 7.3% to $55,990.
Used Cars With The Largest Price Drops
Model
Avg. Price Mar-25
Diff YoY
Diff YoY
Tesla Model S
$47,931
-$9,944
-17.2%
Porsche Taycan
$75,407
-$13,422
-15.1%
Ford Explorer Hybrid
$31,228
-$5,136
-14.1%
BMW 5 Hybrid
$34,375
-$5,557
-13.9%
Tesla Model Y
$30,611
-$4,634
-13.1%
Maserati Levante
$45,413
-$5,898
-11.5%
Mercedes-AMG GT
$78,676
-$9,808
-11.1%
Tesla Model 3
$26,084
-$3,193
-10.9%
Jeep Gladiator
$34,136
-$4,089
-10.7%
Hyundai Kona EV
$20,678
-$2,462
-10.6%
Kia Niro EV
$21,549
-$2,278
-9.6%
Mercedes GLB
$32,953
-$3,411
-9.4%
Volvo S90
$35,182
-$3,574
-9.2%
Genesis G70
$30,304
-$2,877
-8.7%
Chrysler Pacifica
$25,464
-$2,230
-8.1%
Jaguar E-PACE
$26,509
-$2,080
-7.3%
Tesla Model X
$55,990
-$4,387
-7.3%
Corvette Cabrio
$84,605
-$6,629
-7.3%
Lincoln Aviator
$42,918
-$3,302
-7.1%
Chrysler Voyager
$22,077
-$1,614
-6.8%
Average
$31,624
$317
1.0%
SWIPE
Other notable entries on the list include the Maserati Levante, down 11.5 percent, the Jeep Gladiator (-10.7 percent), the Kia Niro EV (-9.6 percent), the Volvo S90 (-9.2 percent) and the Chevrolet Corvette Convertible, whose price declined by 7.3 percent.
Worst Performing Brands
Tesla was named the brand with the steepest year-over-year declines in used car pricing. Across its lineup, its models lost an average of 10.1 percent in value over the past year, which translates to $3,541 on average. Chrysler followed closely behind, with an 8.9 percent drop, while Maserati, Genesis, Dodge, Buick, and Chevrolet also posted noticeable losses.
“In both the new and used car markets, Tesla prices have been dropping for over two years,” iSeeCarsexecutive analyst Karl Brauer said. “Price cuts on new Teslas immediately impacted used Teslas, driving their prices down at a rapid rate. The new car price cuts were driven by Tesla’s desire to maintain sales growth, but that strategy stopped working last year when the automaker saw its first decline in annual sales.”
Huawei has given us a peek inside the ultra-luxurious Maextro S800 sedan.
The upscale interior looks nice, but cribs from BMW, Mercedes and Rolls-Royce.
The luxury sedan will be offered with electric and range-extended powertrains.
Huawei unveiled the Maextro S800 last year and now the company is giving us a peek inside its ultra-luxurious cabin. Unsurprisingly, it’s heavily inspired by Mercedes-Maybach and Rolls-Royce models.
Drivers sit behind an elegant two-tone steering wheel and find themselves looking at a ‘floating’ display that closely echoes the MBUX Hyperscreen. There’s no word on dimensions, but the EQS has a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, a 17.7-inch infotainment system, and a 12.3-inch front passenger display.
The Mercedes-like styling cues continue elsewhere as there are stylish metal speaker grilles that mimic Burmester units. They’re joined by familiar door-mounted seat controls.
Elsewhere, there are digital side mirror displays, a dual wireless smartphone charger, and a splash of wood trim on the center console. Designers also gave the car a stylish rotary knob as well as metallic accents. Buyers will also find a luxurious mix of leather and suede-like upholstery.
While the cockpit is nice, the rear passenger compartment is the star of the show. It features two individual rear seats with power adjustment as well as a foot rest. The front passenger seat also slides out of the way, so you can sit back and enjoy the ride.
The seats are separated by an elegant leather and wood console, which features deployable tray tables. It also sports an elegant champagne flute holder and a retractable drawer. We can also expect a refrigerated compartment as well as a rear seat entertainment system.
Above, there’s a starry headliner inspired by the Rolls-Royce playbook. They’re joined by door-mounted screens that echo those found on the BMW 7-Series.
The luxury barge will be launched later this year and measure 215.7 inches (5,480 mm) long with a wheelbase spanning 132.7 inches (3,370 mm). This makes the model 0.4 inches (10 mm) longer than the Mercedes-Maybach S-Class, although it has a 1 inch (25 mm) shorter wheelbase.
CarNewsChina reports the model is expected to be offered with an electric powertrain that features a 94.4 kWh battery pack. This should provide CLTC ranges of 416 miles (670 km) and 436 miles (702 km).
An extended-range variant is also said to be in the works with a smaller 63.3 kWh battery. It will reportedly offer electric-only ranges between 160 miles (258 km) and 193 miles (311 km).
Pricing reportedly starts at ¥1 million, which is the equivalent of $137,230. That’s not too shabby considering the Mercedes-Maybach S480 starts at ¥1.48 million ($203,100) in China.
The BMW Skytop will be followed by more limited-production models from the brand.
One of them will be a bespoke BMW M, designed as a halo model for enthusiasts.
This news follows reports about scrapped sports car and supercar development projects.
BMW seems to be on a mission to cash in on the growing appetite for ridiculously expensive, limited-edition cars with a new halo model aimed at its performance division. And, it seems BMW M is finally tuning in to the demands of fans, who have long been begging for a modern version of the M1, blending the exotic appeal of the past with a contemporary twist.
The news follows the announcement that the BMW Skytop concept from last year’s Concorso d’Eleganza Villa d’Este will soon enter production, with only 50 units expected and a rumored price tag of $500k. The success of this project has inspired BMW to roll out more similarly bespoke models, though this time, they’ll carry the M emblem.
A Future of Ultra-Limited Editions
Sylvia Neubauer, BMW M’s Vice President of customers, brand, and sales, shared some insight into the company’s future direction with AutoExpress: “BMW’s strategy is to have a series of small-series additions that we offer to the markets. There will be something coming at Villa d’Este this year, and probably some future small-series editions with the ‘M’ designation.”
When asked if this could include a bespoke BMW M model inspired by the original M1, Neubauer stated:
“Definitely, such halo cars clearly position the brand. They make it very, very desirable. They have that positive spillover effect on the brand and on the product portfolio. You’re making a certain customer group very, very happy with these dream cars. Even those that cannot afford the car admire the brand. This will be part of our future road map as well.”
A New M1, Sort of?
Several months ago, reports surfaced about BMW having worked on a spiritual successor to the M1, possibly with a plug-in hybrid powertrain. The I16 project was allegedly 95% ready when it was scrapped in favor of the controversial XM SUV. Other reports suggest that plans for a fully electric supercar were also cancelled after it reached the clay model stage.
While we still don’t know if the upcoming bespoke BMW M car will have any ties to these canceled projects, the sighting of the Neue Klasse EV Coupe in testing suggests something special could be on the horizon. If the camouflaged prototype’s dramatic design is paired with the performance capabilities of BMW’s next-gen electric powertrain, we might just be looking at a true M1 successor, albeit one with a very different powertrain under the hood.
Baldauf
Competing with Porsche?
Neubauer was also asked whether the new model could compete with the Porsche 911, to which she replied: “That market obviously is an interesting market. But we also know that Porsche customers are very, very loyal to their brand. So if we do it, we definitely need to do it spot on—100 percent.”
This doesn’t exactly provide a definitive answer about the car’s design or character, but Neubauer did confirm that BMW M is “internally” working on a “dream car.” When asked about its launch timing, Neubauer added, “Let’s wait for the right time.”
With all these pieces falling into place, it’s clear that BMW M has something big on the way. Whether it’s an M1 revival, a fully electric supercar, or something else entirely, one thing is for sure: The wait will likely be worth it.
Tesla’s new 0% APR financing deal applies only to the Model 3, not other models.
Full Self-Driving transfers are back for those upgrading from a previous Tesla vehicle.
Tesla is rolling out a pair of what it hopes will be high-impact incentives. In an effort to drive sales before the end of Q2, it’s offering 0% APR financing on Model 3 and the return of Full Self-Driving (Supervised) transfers. Both offers are appealing on paper, but like most things Tesla, there are some strings attached.
The headliner here is the 0% APR deal, which is only available on the Model 3. Not the Model Y, not the S, not the X, just the entry-level sedan. Qualifying depends on options and tax incentives, but it appears to be available with $0 down in some states.
It’s also capped at 60 months. That’s about $6,000 down (over the loan term) on the cheapest rear-wheel-drive Model 3, and you’ll also need top-tier credit to lock it in. Still, it’s a rare move in today’s high-interest environment, and one that could tip the scales for shoppers on the fence.
Also back, for a limited time: FSD transfers. If you previously bought Tesla’s Full Self-Driving beta package for anywhere from $7,500 to $12,000 and are thinking about upgrading to a new vehicle, you can bring that feature with you, no need to repurchase. There’s no word on when the deal will end, but we expect it won’t live into the third quarter, so interested parties will want to move sooner rather than later.
These moves, of course, come at a time when Tesla is navigating a tougher sales climate. Competition is getting better, opposition is getting fiercer, and tariffs could drive prices up more, too. Obviously, Tesla wants to clear inventory and keep customers inside the family with these deals.
While these two deals are good for those interested, they’re not the only ones we’ve seen in recent months. The new Model Y is available in China with 0% APR, and the old Model Y is the subject of massive discounts too. Even the opinion-splitting slab-sided Cybertruck is available for thousands off of MSRP right now. Clearly, Tesla knows it needs to move metal, and it’s doing all it can to achieve that goal.
Vox Populi, Vox Dei … FSD Transfer is back
All countries (in NA), all S3XY + @cybertruck (excl Foundation Series & Launch Series)
Mercedes-AMG appears to be teasing the redesigned GT 4-Door.
The model will debut this summer and battle the Porsche Taycan.
It features a stylish new design as well as a high-tech electric powertrain.
Mercedes’ design department has been in a funk as for every hit, there’s multiple misses including the CLA, EQE, and EQS. However, another home run is on the horizon as the company appears to be teasing a sleek new sedan.
Mercedes-AMG isn’t saying much at this point, but they revealed “something big is coming” in June. The message was accompanied by a dark teaser image that shows a stylish sports car with a protruding nose and prominent headlights.
They’re joined by a rakish windscreen that flows into a dynamic roofline that continues almost all the way to the end of the car. We can also see muscular rear haunches and an expansive greenhouse.
While the company is playing coy, the performance brand appears to be teasing the redesigned GT 4-Door. Spy photographers have caught the model on numerous occasions, but it’s been heavily disguised so we weren’t expecting something quite so stunning.
The car is slated to go into production later this year and the company has previously confirmed it will ride on the “first dedicated electric vehicle architecture developed by Mercedes‑AMG.” It’s known as the AMG Electric Architecture (AMG.EA) and the model promises to be a “technological trailblazer, which will pioneer a number of new innovations.”
Details are few and far between, but the Porsche Taycan competitor is slated to have a high-performance battery as well as axial-flux motors. The model was previewed by the Vision AMG concept and rumors have suggested the range-topping variant could have around 1,000 hp (746 kW / 1,014 PS).
Slate’s $28K EV truck is still in development, but Ford’s Maverick is available now.
The Maverick offers better range, towing capacity, and features than Slate’s EV.
Production of the Slate EV is expected to begin towards the end of 2026.
There’s no denying that Slate Auto is turning a lot of heads right now. Their new truck, which can be optioned into a SUV, sounds promising as it strips away the excess in an effort to create an affordable, practical runabout. It even boasts an electric drivetrain to keep running costs low.
All sounds good, right? In theory, it’s an appealing prospect, but here’s the thing: what Slate is selling for the future (plus a whole lot more) is already available today in the form of the Ford Maverick.
Pricing: Promises vs. Reality
Let’s start off with its biggest selling point, the reason why the internet went wild in the first place: the price. The newly announced Slate pickup promises a starting price of “around $28,000,” but that’s far from set in stone. Assuming nothing changes, and that’s a tariff-sized assumption, if you factor in the $7,500 federal tax credit, the base price could theoretically drop to about $20,500.
But again, that’s all hypothetical. Given that the Trump administration has repeatedly suggested eliminating these credits, who knows what will happen in late 2026 when it supposedly hits the market.
On the other hand, as you’re reading this, you can walk into any Ford dealership and drive off with a 2024 Maverick XL for $23,920. That’s for the 250-hp 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder-equipped model. Because it’s available and if you click on Ford’s page, that’s the model it directs you to. If you’re looking at the 2025MY, prices start from $26,995 for the 191-hp 2.5-liter hybrid FWD variant, and $27,570 for the 250-hp EcoBoost AWD. And that’s before factoring in any additional deals or potential incentives, plus delivery fees, of course.
Range and Efficiency
Now, let’s talk efficiency and range. Slate’s truck promises 150 miles of range in its base form, powered by a 52.7 kWh battery. No doubt, the optional 84.3 kWh battery, offering up to 240 miles of range, looks more promising, but it’ll cost you extra. According to the Detroit company, charging it will take somewhere between 4 to 8 hours.
For the sake of comparing base models, we’ve focused on the 2024 Maverick XL with the 2.0L turbo, which is the most affordable option you can buy right now. This base trim delivers 26 mpg according to the EPA. Meanwhile, the hybrid variant with a 191-hp engine can achieve up to 42 mpg combined.
And let’s not forget the convenience factor. You can fill up the Maverick at any gas station in America in about 3 minutes. No waiting around for hours as your truck “recharges,” praying that the charging station isn’t busy or, you know, completely broken. If you do the math, the Maverick’s EPA numbers give you nearly 430 miles of range, while Slate’s truck promises to hit just over a third of that, assuming, of course, it’s not freezing outside or anything.
SPECS
Model
Maverick
Slate
Wheelbase
121.1 in.
108.9 in.
Length
199.7 in.
174.6 in.
Width
77.9 in.
70.6 in.
Height
68.7 in.
69.3 in.
Bed Length
54.4 in.
60.0 in
Bed Volume
33.3 cu ft
35.1 cu ft
Frunk Volume
–
7 cu ft
Seats / Doors
5 / 4
2 /2
Motor
2.0L Turbo
Single Electric
Drive
FWD / AWD
RWD
Power
250 hp
201 hp (150kW)
Torque
277 lb.-ft.
Range
429 miles
150 – 240 Miles
Fills Up In
3 Minutes
4-8 Hours
Towing
2,000 lbs
1,000 lbs
Payload
1,500 lbs
1,400 lbs
* Manufacture specifications
SWIPE
Now, Slate’s concept has some cool ideas like swappable body panels and modular bits, but let’s be honest: fun, quirky features don’t always survive the realities of potholes, payloads, and subzero mornings.
Speaking of payloads, let’s break down the specs. The Slate can tow up to 1,000 lbs and haul 1,433 lbs of cargo. Meanwhile, the base Maverick doubles the towing capacity at 2,000 lbs and has a 1,500-lb payload capacity. The Slate boasts a five-foot bed, while the Maverick’s is a bit more compact at 4.5 feet.
That said, the Maverick can seat five people at all times, even with the bed in use, while the Slate takes the cargo volume crown with 35.1 cu.ft and an additional 7 cu.ft in the frunk, compared to the Maverick’s 33.3 cu.ft.
Slate’s EV Is Laughably Bare Bones, Doesn’t Even Have Speakers
We won’t get too deep into the quality and features since we’ve only seen the prototype in pictures, not in person, and things might change when it hits production. But judging by the close up photos from our pals at The Autopian, this thing could make a 1980s Lada Niva look posh. To be fair, their motto is “We built it. You make it.” So, maybe “luxury” is all in the eye of the beholder.
But it’s not that you won’t get an infotainment screen, you won’t get anything. No power windows, no cupholders, no speakers, no radio, no armrest, no glovebox – all of these are “extras.” In fact, customers will have the option to choose from over 100 of these “accessories”, as you can see for yourself in the configurator.
We’re honestly surprised they even bothered with seats and a steering wheel. This thing is laughably bare-bones, even by decades-old standards. In contrast, the base Maverick at least comes with all the modern creature comforts you’ll actually need – and then some.
A Real Truck vs. Wishful Thinking
In the end, the Maverick is a real truck, with a real bed, and a real warranty that’s sold by a brand that has been around for over a century. Contrast that with Slate’s trucklet: an unproven EV with startup dreams and very little track record, though they’ve certainly done an excellent job going viral. We’ll give them that.
Of course, Slate’s vision still deserves some credit. It’s trying to solve a real problem: new vehicles are getting too expensive. But the Ford Maverick proves you don’t have to sacrifice practicality or usability to hit that sweet spot. You can walk into a showroom today and drive out with a functional, fuel-efficient pickup that actually exists.
You don’t have to wait for something that maybe will show up someday, hoping it somehow avoids the massive pitfalls other companies have stumbled into when it comes to service and customer care.
Maybe Slate will pull it off. Maybe it won’t. But until then, the best budget truck-slash-crossover EV isn’t a futuristic trucklet. It’s wearing a Blue Oval and parked at your local dealer.
Land Rover has dropped new photos and details about the Range Rover Electric.
The SUV features a 117 kWh battery pack that was designed and built in-house.
Power comes from a dual-motor all-wheel drive system producing 542 hp.
The Range Rover Electric is inching closer to production as Land Rover has announced prototypes have successfully completed their second season of cold weather testing in northern Europe. They racked up to 45,000 miles (72,420 km) validating various systems and pushing them to their limits.
Much of the focus was on the SUV’s thermal management system known as ThermAssist. It reduces heating energy consumption by up to 40% and aims to recover heat to warm the propulsion system or cabin in temperatures as low as 14°F (‑10°C). This helps to maximize range as well as efficiency.
Besides testing out ThermAssist, the company worked on their air suspension and one-pedal driving mode. The latter is a common feature on EVs and allows drivers to only use the accelerator as the regenerative braking system kicks in as soon as you lift your foot off the ‘go pedal.’ However, Land Rover noted their application works with the Terrain Response system so it’s off-road ready.
The automaker went on to confirm the model has their first battery to be designed and built in‑house. The 117 kWh unit consists of 344 prismatic cells in a double‑stacked layout. The company added it has been “optimized for energy density, range and charging times” in order to deliver the “effortless performance and customary refinement expected of a Range Rover.”
Battery aside, the Range Rover EV has an all-wheel drive system with Intelligent Driveline Dynamics technology. It can distribute rear torque from 100% to 0% to prevent a loss of traction. Furthermore, the model can respond to slips and traction changes within 50 milliseconds, which is up to 100 times quicker than an ICE vehicle.
JLR Vehicle Engineering Director Matt Becker said, “By increasing its torsional stiffness and improving its responses, we’ve been able to maintain a customary Range Rover driving experience that feels familiar.” He added this was made possible by “marrying all the essential Range Rover elements with new and advanced technologies.”
While the company didn’t reveal too many details, Top Gear is reporting the model has a dual-motor all-wheel drive system with a combined output of 542 hp (404 kW / 550 PS) and 627 lb-ft (849 Nm) of torque. If that pans out, the Range Rover Electric would be more powerful than the P530 variant, which has a twin-turbo 4.4-liter V8 developing 523 hp (390 kW / 530 PS) and 553 lb-ft (749 Nm) of torque.
Login
