Electric power should be the ultimate match for ultra-luxury motoring. On paper, nothing suits a Rolls-Royce, Bentley, or Maybach better than smooth, silent propulsion and torque-rich acceleration.

These are brands built on quietness, presence, and seamless power delivery, the very same traits electric vehicles seem born to provide better than any V12 ever has. In theory, this should be a golden era for the top of the market.

Review: The Rolls-Royce Spectre Is The Ultimate EV Right Now

Wealthy owners don’t worry about range, rarely road-trip their cars across states, and often have multiple vehicles (and dedicated home charging) to rotate through. So why is it that the first wave of ultra-luxury EVs is landing with a thud on the used market?

The clearest example of this is the Rolls-Royce Spectre. It’s elegant, impeccably built, and quieter than basically everything else in their lineup. Despite that, resale values are cratering faster than it can rocket from 0 to 60.

Are Rich Buyers Backing Off?

Take, for instance, the Spectre listed on Bring a Trailer early last year. With only 99 miles on the odometer and the added appeal of being a “Launch Package” edition, it failed to meet reserve with a high bid of just $451,000. That might sound like a lot, but its MSRP was $521,650.

This week, we also spotted two low-mileage, certified pre-owned examples at a Rolls-Royce Boston dealership, each listed with six-figure discounts off their original MSRP! Don’t get us wrong, no luxury car (outside of hypercars) is going to maintain perfect value.

Rolls-Royce Motorcars Boston

But together, these two Spectres from Herb Chambers originally carried a combined sticker price of $1,064,725. The lower-mileage example, showing just over 2,100 miles, is listed at $385,575, or $136,000 below its original MSRP of $521,575.

The other Spectre, with only 3,822 miles on the odometer, is priced at $385,150, reflecting a massive $158,000 drop from its $543,150 MSRP from about a year ago. That’s enough to buy a brand-new Porsche 911 Carrera T ($143,700) and still have money left over for something else.

More: Someone Drove This Maserati 255 Miles And Lost Almost $100,000

Which circles us back to the broader question. Why is it that wealthy buyers are steering clear of super-luxury EVs like the Spectre? Does it come down to tradition and the desire for a classic internal combustion powertrain like a V12 powerhouse?

Is infrastructure anxiety still a factor, even at the top end of the market? Or maybe some buyers simply haven’t driven them enough (or at all) to realize just how rewarding they really are. We’re curious what you think. Let us know in the comments below.

Rolls-Royce Motorcars Boston

The 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E has quietly introduced a change that’s small in size but significant in everyday use. Every trim level now comes with real rear door handles.

For owners who spent years pressing a tiny electric pad and awkwardly tugging at the door edge, this is a big quality-of-life upgrade. In fact, it might be even more noteworthy than the new California Special package.

Read: Electric Door Handles Face Global Scrutiny After Deadly EV Crashes

The Blue Oval brand has long faced criticism over its rear door handle situation. Until now, entering the rear seats required touching a small electric door popper on the C-pillar.

Once the door was popped open, a second mechanism would keep it from closing fully until someone opened it up to get into the car or put something in the second row. It was a complex system, now made slightly simpler.

A spokesperson from Ford confirmed the change for the 2026MY to InsideEVs saying:

“All 2026 Mustang Mach-Es get the rear door handle as standard equipment. This was a change as part of our always-on approach that we made due to feedback from our customers who wanted a physical handle on both front and rear. The rear door still uses the same electronic latch release with the button on the door, but now the door can be pulled open with the handle.”

So, for clarification, the majority of the mechanism is unchanged. Users just don’t have to put their hand in the door jamb to open it. We’ve reached out for more information from Ford regarding whether or not this design change had anything to do with critiques over rear-door safety.

We also asked if it has any plans to make ingress easier should the 12-volt battery die. We’ll update this piece if we hear back.

In addition to the new door handles, Ford announced that the California Special package is coming back in a new way. While there aren’t any performance benefits over the GT trim it’s built on, the package features a lot of visual enhancements.

The star of the show is Rave Blue, a color-shifting blue/violet shade meant to echo the Pacific coastline. 20-inch wheels get unique GT/CS lettering and aero inserts. There are blue and silver interior accents and special Navy Pier ActiveX + Miko performance seats, too.

Pricing for 2026 also nudges downward. The Mach-E GT now starts at $53,395, about $1,100 less than last year, while the California Special package adds $2,495. The broader Mach-E lineup starts at $37,795, down $200.

Ford CEO Jim Farley has joined several of his American counterparts in supporting the Trump administration’s decision to reset federal fuel-economy standards.

The move, Farley says, gives automakers the breathing room to produce more affordable vehicles in the United States without walking away from electric innovation or efficiency goals.

Farley’s core argument seems to be that regulations were so strict that they effectively squeezed automakers out of the low-cost segments so many buyers still rely on.

Read: Trump Admin Pushes Fuel Economy Shakeup And The Impact Could Be Huge

Speaking at a press conference with President Donald J. Trump on Thursday, Farley called the update “a victory for affordability and common sense,” adding that Ford will now be able to offer cheaper versions of its most popular models and launch new price-focused products.

“We believe that people should be able to make a choice, as you said, Mr. President,” Farley said. “And we will invest more in affordable vehicles. This allows us to invest in affordable vehicles made in the U.S., which we will take the lead on and will allow us to make vehicles more affordable.”

Trump, sitting beside him, said, “People were brainwashed. This is a ‘green new scam.’ And people were paying too much for a car that didn’t work as well. And now they’re gonna have a great car that’s gonna be environmentally friendly, but it’s gonna cost you a lot less and it’s gonna work great. All of the nonsense is being taken out of the cars.”

Political Theater or Market Reality?

Farley stopped short of framing the move as an ideological shift, instead focusing on the economics. He argued that the tightened CAFE standards under the previous administration imposed costs that made entry-level vehicles much harder to justify.

That pressure, he said, pushed automakers toward higher-margin EVs and hybrids simply to meet fleet targets.

“What you should know is that this is a victory for affordability and common sense. As the president said, we will be able to offer more affordability on our popular models, and we’ll be able to launch new vehicles built in America that are more affordable because of this rule change,” Farley said later in an interview on “Fox & Friends” Thursday.

Farley added that the earlier fuel-economy system “was totally out of touch with market reality.” Automakers, he said, were forced to sell EVs and other vehicles to stay compliant, even when customer demand wasn’t there.

“We were forced to sell EVs and other vehicles. We’re not going back to gas-guzzlers,” he continued. “We have a lot of EVs and a lot of hybrids at Ford, but now customers get a chance to choose what they want, not by what we force on them.”

Balancing Choice and Compliance

Ford’s CEO also clarified that the company isn’t returning to inefficient gas models, noting it already sells a wide range of EVs and hybrids. GM’s CEO Mary Barra recently made similar comments.

Also: GM’s Mary Barra Promises Cleaner Engines, But Looser Rules Fuel More Gas Guzzlers

The reset rolls back the steep increases introduced under the Biden administration, which raised fuel-economy requirements by 8% for 2024 and 2025 and 10% for 2026. Federal officials previously estimated those rules would add nearly $1,000 to the average new-car price.

By contrast, the new standard lowers compliance costs and, according to the White House, will save American families a combined $109 billion. Now, the market waits to see if automakers really do deliver on their promises of rolling out more affordable models.

Photo Whitehouse/YouTube

This year has been a strange one for automakers, but many of them just caught a break. The EPA effectively wiped out penalties for missing fuel-economy targets, a move that could easily trigger another surge in high-margin full-size trucks and SUVs.

More: Trump Admin Pushes Fuel Economy Shakeup And The Impact Could Be Huge

With less regulatory pressure, engines don’t have to get cleaner or more efficient, yet GM CEO Mary Barra insists the company will keep pushing them in that direction anyway.

She maintains that GM will improve every combustion engine it invests in, no matter what the rulebook says. Whether that commitment holds once the market leans even harder toward big, profitable gas-guzzlers is another matter entirely.

How Long Will Progress Last?

Innovation is no doubt key for all automakers, so the promise of continued development is promising on paper. That’s what Barra provided at the New York Time’s DealBook Summit on Wednesday, saying, “Every engine we invest in, we work to have a significant improvement.”

It seems clear that tougher fuel economy standards have led to huge costs for automakers. A recent report indicates that many of the larger recalls from the past two years can be linked to those standards.

Whether or not GM and other automakers will continue to push fuel economy as hard as they have is a worthy consideration.

What’s the Incentive Now?

For decades, automakers have intentionally steered consumers toward larger SUVs and trucks because they offer the largest profits and require the least stringent fuel economy standards.

Read: GM’s Cheapest American EV Starts With A Chinese Shortcut

It’s unclear why that strategy would change now that the penalties are gone altogether. Still, something positive could come from new regulations in Barra’s eyes.

Barra also supported Trump’s move to strip California of tougher clean-air authority, pushing instead for one national standard that doesn’t “get in front of the consumer.” However, automakers helped create today’s SUV-heavy demand, so that argument only goes so far.

Looser rules also ease pressure on EVs, a convenient shift for GM as sales dip after tax credits expired and its electric lineup remains unprofitable. Barra insists the company is still committed.

She was more positive on tariffs, calling recent policies “a more level playing field” after years of uneven barriers. GM may keep refining engines, but with weaker rules and a market built around giant SUVs, it’s hard to imagine Detroit walking away from its biggest profit margins.

Autonomous driving may have come a long way in the last decade but, apparently, there’s room for improvement. Waymo, one of the leaders in the space, still has some bugs to work out – and one of them is how to handle active crime scenes.

Video from just a few days ago shows one of the firms’ robotaxis casually rolling through an intersection as police with guns drawn attempt to make a felony arrest. 

Footage of the incident popped up via content creator Alex Choi. In the video, we see the car turning left at an intersection. Just off the road in the oncoming lane is a parked truck with the driver’s door open. Just to the left of the truck, a suspect is face down on the ground with officers holding him at gunpoint. 

More: Waymo Robotaxis Racked Up 589 Parking Tickets In A Year

Strangely, the robotaxi actually slows down and appears to pause as it passes the suspect. Keep in mind that the car itself was in the line of fire at this point. The video ends after the car has left the scene, while the police move in for the arrest.

Police told NBC that the incident happened around 3:40 a.m. and that officers’ tactics were unchanged by the robotaxi’s interference. 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Alex Choi (@alex.choi)

For its part, the company responded that the entire situation lasted just 15 seconds. “Safety is our highest priority at Waymo, both for people who choose to ride with us and with whom we share the streets,” a spokesperson said.

“When we encounter unusual events like this one, we learn from them as we continue improving road safety and operating in dynamic cities.”

The company has logged more than 100 million miles of autonomous driving as of mid-2025 and boasts a strong safety record, but it hasn’t been immune from oddities and public-relations headaches.

Earlier this year, pranksters redirected 50 Waymos to the same San Francisco intersection, gridlocking traffic. In a separate incident, five Waymo vehicles were set ablaze during protests in Los Angeles.

The plan? At dusk, 50 people went to San Francisco's longest dead-end street and all ordered a Waymo at the same time.

The world's first: WAYMO DDOS pic.twitter.com/DEDH0tdMKP

— Riley Walz (@rtwlz) October 12, 2025

Credit: Alex Choi

Scout Motors is getting closer to production every day, and it’s planning to launch with a curated soundscape. Forget generic beeps, the revived American off-road brand is sending sound engineers across the country on what sounds like an audio-archeology road trip.

More: Scout Motors Says Over 80% Of Buyers Picked A Surprising Powertrain

If everything goes according to plan, the Traveler SUV and Terra pickup won’t just be made in the United States, they’ll sound like it, too.

What Does America Sound Like?

Scout Chief Design Officer, Chris Benjamin, says the brand’s UX team has been collecting natural mechanical noises and atmospheric tones to create more than 40 bespoke sounds for locks, turn signals, warning chimes, and startup sequences. 

“All of the sounds inside the vehicle, we want them to feel authentic to us and unique,” Benjamin told Autonews at the L.A. Auto Show, adding that Scout isn’t aiming for an utterly quiet, library-like cabin.

Obviously, recorded sounds are quite different from the real thing, but it’s clear that the Scout team wants to do the best it can with the modern technology on hand.

The team even brought a vintage International Harvester Scout, complete with a V8, into an anechoic chamber and recorded sounds in isolation. 

The same raw mechanical noises found on that model, from the door latches to the locks to the V8 itself, will make it into the new offerings from Scout.

In a nod to the brand’s agricultural heritage, the team also visited Adairville, Kentucky. There, they found a farm and recorded industrial farming equipment inside a grain silo. Other audio layers in the car come from an acoustic guitar.

“You have a little bit of industry, a little bit of agriculture, a little bit of the original Scout in each one of the sounds,” Benjamin said.

Scout says its EVs won’t chase sterile, ultra-minimalist, sci-fi EV interior cues. Yes, there’s a digital gauge cluster and a large center screen, but there will also be real knobs, real switches, and real buttons.

The tactile nature of the cabin connects to the brand’s rugged DNA, and the carefully curated sounds will reinforce it.

“We’re not creating spaceships,” Benjamin said. “We’re creating hearty, wholesome vehicles that people will love, and we want the sounds to reflect that.”

Production of the Terra and Traveler begins in South Carolina in late 2027, after a run of pilot builds in 2026. 

Honda has released its sales figures for November, and the picture isn’t pretty. The company recorded US sales of 91,582 units, a notable decline of 16.8 percent compared to the same month last year, when it delivered 110,020 vehicles.

Despite the monthly slowdown, the company’s year-to-date total of 1,190,328 vehicles still reflects a modest 1.8 percent increase over the same period in 2024.

Also: Sales Of Honda’s Only American EV Soar 963%

Among Honda’s key nameplates, most saw declines in November, with only slight variation between them. The Accord recorded 10,613 sales in November, down 9.1 percent from 2024, while the Civic moved 17,353 units, a 5.5 percent decline. The Odyssey minivan had a rougher month, slipping 17.3 percent to 5,492 units.

SUVs and crossovers continued to shoulder most of the brand’s sales volume, led by the CR-V at 29,421 units and the HR-V at 10,821. Both posted notable drops of 14.5 percent and 14.1 percent respectively. The Pilot followed with a 27 percent decline to 9,234 units, and the Ridgeline pickup slid 15.4 percent to 3,352.

Unsurprisingly, the steepest fall came from Honda’s electric Prologue, which was caught in the aftermath of the federal EV tax credit shake-up at the end of September. Sales cratered by 86.8 percent, plunging from 6,823 units last November to just 903 this time around.

There was a glimmer of good news as the Passport surged (again) 50 percent to 4,363 units, standing out as the lone bright spot in an otherwise gloomy report.

A Quiet Start for a Comeback Coupe

That brings us to Honda’s newcomer, the Prelude, which officially entered the U.S. market last month. According to manufacturer data, 30 new buyers took delivery of the hybrid coupe after it went on sale around the third week of November.

No doubt, that figure will grow as production ramps up and imports arrive, so there’s little reason to draw conclusions just yet. Still, a heritage model like this tends to move quickly once stock builds up, though Honda’s pricing might slow that momentum.

The Prelude has made big waves since Honda admitted that it was returning. For the most part, that press has been good. In Japan, it was so popular among folks in their 50s and 60s that dealers had to pause taking orders for it. Of course, not all coverage of the car is so rosy. A starting MSRP of $43,195 (including destination) put it within $1,000 of a Nissan Z, which has the same number of seats and double the horsepower.

More: Delusional Honda Dealers Marking Up New Prelude To Over $60,000

Notably, Honda only offers the Prelude in a single trim with just about every desirable option already included. Prospective buyers can add around $10,000 worth of additional accessories, special wheels, and more. That said, the big draw for the Prelude, other than its name and styling, is performance in the fuel economy department. It can achieve up to 46 mpg in the city, 41 on the highway, and 44 combined.

Honda US Sales November 2025

$43,195 already seems like a lot of cash for such a niche car, but get this: dealer markups are only making things worse. Late last month, we told you about some dealers asking $60,000 or more for this car. One justified it with a “Protection Package & Market Adjustment” tag for $14,995. That type of pricing is almost certainly going to keep the rollout slow for the time being.

Of course, not every dealer will price the car that way. Plenty will sell it at MSRP or near there. The real question is how many buyers in the U.S. will be willing to buy it and join the first 30 owners.

John Halas contributed to this story.

Maryland has long pitched itself as a leader in clean energy, aiming to put 1.1 million electric vehicles on its roads by 2030. As of October 2025, registration numbers are under 150,000, so the state is far from meeting its target or even its desired adoption rate.

Now, a new law is only going to make that goal harder to reach. That’s because it’ll likely reduce the number of available electric vehicle chargers across the state.

More: EV Charger Adapter Explodes Moments After Tesla Plugged In

Beginning on January 1, 2026, all public EV chargers in Maryland that accept any form of payment must register with the state’s Weights and Measures program. To do so will cost $150 per charging port annually.

For common four-port Level 2 installations, that’ll be a cool $600 a year in state fees. By comparison, Maryland charges just $20 per gasoline pump nozzle.

The Maryland Department of Agriculture, which oversees Weights and Measures enforcement, tells Planetizen that the fee will help cover inspection, verification, and compliance efforts.

According to officials, inspectors will begin visiting sites in January to confirm registration and ensure chargers clearly display required information, including rates and responsible service contacts.

Charging ports that aren’t registered in time will end up being taken offline with a stop-use notice and a big red tag. Repairs or adjustments on non-compliant equipment will require approval by a registered service agency. In other words, EV owners in Maryland might have to change where they charge.

Maryland’s idiotic $150/yr fee and EV charger inspection program rolls on, despite consumer, industry pushback https://t.co/yCxX1FWlyU

— Mark Lyon (@markhlyon) November 16, 2025

Who Pays the Price?

Independent operators and property owners who host chargers at apartments, condos, workplaces, hotels, or retail spaces have expressed concern over the change. They say the annual fee will impact the economics of maintaining the chargers they have that see lower usage rates.

Others argue that commercial fast-charging networks are better positioned to absorb the cost, while smaller charger hosts might end up having to take chargers offline to handle it.

State inspectors are expected to begin accuracy testing of electricity metering in spring 2026. New charging hardware installed after January will require certified compliance before being activated for public use. How this all shakes out will be something that only time can tell.

@SoundMoneyG more Maryland taxes. This time they're going after EVs. https://t.co/RnTpfnTc7s

— Dan Oh (@Misfit486) December 1, 2025

It’s been clear for years that electric vehicles aren’t just efficient, they’re mind-blowing fast. Now, Rivian is proving it all over again with a truck that weighs over 7,000 pounds (3,175 kg) once the driver jumps in.

Results from a fresh independent test make it hard to argue otherwise: the R1T Quad Motor Max Pack is astonishingly fast. So fast, in fact, that it can line up against the 655 hp Corvette E-Ray hybrid in a drag race and come away even. Just think about that for a second.

How Fast Is It Really?

The folks over at Car and Driver just managed to sprint from 0-60 mph (97 km/h) in the R1T in just 2.6 seconds. That’s the exact same time that the Tesla Cybertruck managed, but past 60 mph, the Rivian leaves the angular Tesla for dead.

More: Rivian And VW Are Teaming Up To Reinvent The New Electric Golf Mk9

By 70 mph (113 km/h), the R1T is already ahead of the Cybertruck, and by 100 mph (161 km/h), it’s 0.9 seconds out in front. When the Rivian crosses the quarter mile, the Tesla is still 0.6 seconds behind despite weighing less.

In the end, the Rivian covers the standard quarter mile in just 10.6 seconds, crossing the line at 128 mph (206 km/h). Yes, that’s a ten-second truck, and it’s as wild as it sounds. That figure represents a huge leap forward, at a full 1.1-second and 17-mph improvement over the previous-generation quad-motor version.

The fact that the automotive world now produces something like this shows just how far things have come since the Fast and Furious era first imagined it.

This level of performance comes from a massive 1,025 horsepower (764 kW) and 1,198 lb-ft (1,625 Nm) of torque. By comparison, America’s everyday supercar in hybrid form, the Corvette E-Ray, pairs a 6.2-liter V8 with an electric motor for a combined 655 hp (488 kW) and 594 lb-ft (806 Nm).

Today, the R1T Quad Motor Max Pack is quick compared to just about everything. The Corvette E-Ray, initially touted as the quickest of its kind, can do 0-60 in 2.5 seconds. By the time it gets to the end of the quarter mile, the Rivian has actually caught it and tied it exactly down to the trap speed.

Few Gas Cars Can Follow

If we get away from electrified sports cars and look at gas-only options, very few cars in the world come even close to keeping up. The Ford F-150 Raptor R needs 3.6 seconds to get to 60 mph. The standard Corvette Stingray needs 2.8. A Porsche 911 GT3 RS needs 2.7.

Put simply, the R1T can do what just about every other car on earth can do, short of tow things a long long way without refueling or, you know, escape a simple fender bender without being a write off.

VinFast is in the spotlight again, this time for reasons it would rather avoid. The Vietnamese automaker now faces another lawsuit, adding a fresh speed bump to its already bumpy road. Owners in the United States claim that the VF 8 Plus AWD charges so slowly it can take a full 24 hours to replenish its battery.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the lawsuit represents customers who leased or purchased a VF 8 Plus AWD in the past four years.

Why So Slow?

The electric vehicles are supposed to charge at a rate of 6.6 kW or higher. Instead, these customers say that their VinFasts charge at under 2 kW. That’s closer to the speed of an original Nissan Leaf than it is to a modern EV.

More: Vinfast Owner Says Their EV Took Over Steering And Nearly Hit A Wall

The plaintiffs, Gil Swigi and Joseph Mizrahi, say that they were led to believe that they were getting standard Level 2 charging performance. VinFast allegedly advertised that its cars could charge at up to 32 amps.

When Mizrahi and Swigi tried that, they claimed the cars would shut down due to software defects. Their only recourse was to charge at 19 amps, which cut total charging speed by almost 40 percent.

To make matters worse, the shutdowns would allegedly happen in the middle of the night with regularity, meaning that owners would wake up to a nasty surprise.

Not only did their car have a problem, but that meant less range to do whatever they had planned for that day. According to Carcomplaints, VinFast attempted multiple repairs on both vehicles in question.

Only when the owners bought additional charging equipment did their cars start to charge at the claimed manufacturer speeds. That said, VinFast successfully argued that both owners agreed to arbitrate their differences. A judge granted that motion, and arbitration is set for February 20, 2026.

Source: Classaction, CarComplaints

Scout Motors drew headlines last year for far more than just reviving a classic brand. It read the tea leaves and decided to launch with both an EV and an extended-range powertrain. Now, as production approaches, we’re getting a clearer view of the final design that customers will soon see in their driveways.

Spoiler alert: it’s almost a mirror image of the early promotional vehicles, apart from a few subtle design tweaks. Extensive testing, though, has been underway for months.

Read: Scout Motors Says Over 80% Of Buyers Picked A Surprising Powertrain

Cody Thacker, VP of commercial operations at Scout, told Autonews that the brand is “very quickly getting to something that looks and feels like real production vehicles,” as multiple generations of testers rack up miles across continents.

The brand already finished its first round of cold-weather testing in Sweden and is preparing for another bout of deep-freeze evaluation.

What Changed Over the Concepts?

From a design standpoint, only a handful of alterations separate the early prototypes from the final shape. Chief design officer Chris Benjamin told the news outlet that while the prototypes’ elegant daytime running lights gracefully bleed into the metal of the front and rear quarter panels, that execution proved too intricate, too expensive, and too complex to stamp at scale.

So instead, the production version will use a “cool insert” that preserves the visual intent without breaking manufacturing budgets.

Under the skin, Scout still plans on both powertrain options, but it’s already benefiting from its initial plan. Since it didn’t commit solely to one or the other, it’s got the flexibility to delay EV production while market demand catches up.

In the meantime, it can build the EREV and sell it. Pre-production is set for late 2026 with customer deliveries in 2027. By that time, the EV market might have another uptick. Either way, Scout will have something to offer.

Built From Strong Partnerships

The platform itself benefits deeply from the VW/Rivian joint venture, leveraging Rivian’s electrical architecture as a base layer for Scout’s durability-focused hardware. Batteries, meanwhile, will come from VW Group’s in-house PowerCo network.

Scout is still publicly targeting a sub-$60,000 entry point, but final numbers will depend on material costs and powertrain mix. Also still undecided is whether the Traveler and Terra will launch simultaneously. As for when series production begins? Scout just says to “stay tuned.”

Source: AutoNews

Kia had a plan just six months ago, one that mapped out several new electric models for the North American market. Now, that plan seems to have hit a wall, stalling before it ever gained momentum.

At the recent Los Angeles Auto Show, Kia America’s vice president of marketing, Russell Wager, shared a candid update. The fate of both the EV4 sedan and Kia’s upcoming pickup truck now hinges on something entirely beyond the company’s reach: tariff stability.

Read: Hyundai And Kia EV Sales Collapse After Tax Credits Vanish Overnight

Speaking to Car and Driver, Wager called out tariffs as the reason that Americans haven’t had access to the EV4 to this point. The car has suffered one delay after another.

What’s the Hold-Up?

When asked about that delay, Wager said “Can you give me the answer of when the tariffs are going to be resolved in Mexico, Canada, and Seoul? If you give me that answer, I’ll be as specific as possible.”

Wager made it clear that the Korean automaker isn’t waiting for tariffs to go away altogether, either. It just wants to see them set at a specific stable figure.

“At that point in time we look at it and say, are we at 25 [percent], are we at 15—and then we can build our business case,” he said. “It was originally designed and engineered when the tariffs were zero percent.”

For now, it’s the uncertainty that keeps cars like the EV4 and Kia’s planned EV pickup out of the USA. Of course, customer demand might not be strong enough anyway after the end of the federal tax EV credits.

Wager admitted that both factors are playing a role. “We’ve got a great portfolio of EVs that are on sale in a lot of other places in the world that we could choose from,” he added. “We just need resolution, and then we also need the consumer market here to want them.”

Get Ready for Price Increases

Between now and whenever Kia decides what to do with the pickup and EV4, it might have to bump prices up.

“Others have raised prices,” Wager said. “I’m not going to name names, and we’ve seen their sales drop. The takeaway is we can’t do it forever. We’ve made it eight months since April so far. If tariffs don’t get resolved or they’re that high, we’ll have to make the business decision. As far as parts tariffs and import tariffs, at some point in time, we can’t absorb it all.”

Hyundai Motor Group has already proven that it can bend a little but part of its biggest draw is being a solid value proposition against rivals. The near future will determine if it can bend enough to keep that reputation without breaking.

It’s hard to argue that owning a vehicle with 1,070 horsepower (797 kW) wouldn’t be extremely fun. However, that excitement turns on its head when you realize that there’s nowhere to refuel, or rather in this case, recharge it.

That’s exactly what just happened to a Brooklyn-based Lucid Gravity Dream Edition buyer. After snatching this unique EV up brand new in September of 2025, he ended up selling it just 400 miles later for a huge loss.

More: Lucid’s Cheaper Gravity Lost Hundreds Of Horses But Found You Thousands In Savings

The seller on Cars & Bids shared a photo of the window sticker for this luxury SUV, listing an MSRP of $141,550. When the hammer fell on his auction sale of the car, it brought just $123,000. That’s a painful $18,500 lesson for 400 miles of usage in a little over a month, amounting to $46.25 for every mile he put on the odometer.

Where Do You Plug In?

Why take such a big loss for a vehicle that the owner says is “an awesome car”? It all comes down to charging it up. For the owner, it was almost like buying a Hellcat and then realizing that the closest gas station is 220 miles away.

Cars&Bids

He says that his initial plan was to charge where he works but then one option after another fell apart until he had to take the loss we’re talking about here.

“I was planning to charge at work but the chargers at my work aren’t working and there is seemingly no plan to fix them. Since I don’t have a charger at home and can’t get one installed this became an unsolvable,” he said in response to a question about the situation.

He then went on to fault his living location, New York, more than anything else.

“I tried to find another solution but in NYC most chargers (all the ones convenient to me) were in parking garages where you had to pay exuberant [sic] prices to park in order to use the chargers. I live a busy life so just couldn’t find a workable solution,” he added.

It’s a little ironic that in a city as vast and densely packed as New York, famous for both its wealth and its gridlock, a high-end EV can still be this impractical. For now, he’s out, but he hasn’t sworn off electric power entirely. According to him, he’ll be back behind the wheel of another EV “as soon as [a solution] presents itself.”

Source: Cars&Bids

Rivian owners take on a risk that many may not fully appreciate when they buy one of these trucks. It’s not just about the company being young, or its future still being written. Those are expected gambles.

The real hidden concern and surprise comes when something goes wrong, and not mechanically, but physically. Damage that would be a quick fix on a Ford, a Toyota or most other legacy carmakers can turn into a financial nightmare with a Rivian, sometimes severe enough to write off the vehicle altogether.

Read: Guess How Much It Costs To Repair This Rivian R1T?

It’s becoming an increasingly common problem, and the ordeal one owner continues to face shows just how complicated it can get.

When Simple Damage Isn’t Simple

Back in May of this year, the employee of a Rivian R1T owner backed into his electric truck. The damage appeared quite straightforward in the rear quarter panel. However, this is a Rivian R1T, so “straightforward” doesn’t really apply in this case.

The rear quarter panel is part of one giant piece that actually includes the roof. In other words, fixing a dent in it, especially a large one, isn’t a simple job. We’ve seen instances of paintless dent repair (PDR) being a savior in some cases. This isn’t one of them.

The owner of the R1T says that his employee’s insurance company initially quoted just $1,700 for the repair. Considering that many of these situations end up in the five-figure range, he knew that was potentially problematic. To that end, he contacted Rivian, and things only got worse from there.

The True Cost of Rivian Repairs

The automaker explained that there was only one certified repair shop within 300 miles (about 480 km), and their estimate came in at a whopping $16,000. Given the huge gap, the owner started asking PDR shops for help, but none would touch the R1T.

Also: Rivian Owner’s DIY Repair Saves Thousands After Mishap And Teaches Us A Lesson

That said, the owner decided to go ahead and go with the certified repair shop, hoping that the final bill would come in lower than the estimate. Instead, the shop found additional damage once the truck was in the building.

The total came to $22,000 after a seven-week repair process. The ordeal wasn’t even over after all that because insurance refused to pay that amount.

Can You Ever Win Against Insurance?

Instead, it offered $13,000 and said that the certified repair shop’s rates were excessive. Faced with either paying the $9k himself or entering arbitration that would delay pickup indefinitely, the owner paid the difference, retrieved the truck, and launched an appeal.

His letters were ignored. A second, more forceful letter outlining what he considered an unfair settlement? Also ignored. Only after filing a complaint with his state’s Secretary of State did the insurer finally respond, this time offering an additional $5,100 to make the issue go away.

The state recommended accepting the offer, and the owner did. “I really enjoy this truck, but this is bonkers,” he says. “I hope Rivian improves design to allow for less expensive repair costs for common dings.”

No doubt, plenty of other Rivian owners hope the same thing.

Photo Reddit u/RepresentativeCat940

For the first time in nearly twenty years, the CEOs of Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis may once again share a table before Congress. The Senate Commerce Committee has called on Ford’s Jim Farley, GM’s Mary Barra, and Stellantis’ Antonio Filosa to testify on January 14 in a high-profile hearing exploring the auto industry’s outlook on federal transportation policy and vehicle affordability.

The session will also delve into the uneasy transition toward electrification, a subject that continues to divide policymakers and automakers alike. Tesla’s VP of Vehicle Engineering, Lars Moravy, has been invited to join the discussion, adding an electric perspective to the mix.

More: Lawmakers Demand Answers From Hertz On AI Rental Damages System

The last time all three Detroit bosses appeared together on Capitol Hill was late 2008 during the financial crisis, bailout negotiations, and a moment when the industry’s future looked genuinely uncertain. This time, the pressure points are different but no less significant.

Why Bring Them Together Now?

Senator Ted Cruz, who’s spearheading the hearing, has titled it “Pedal to the Policy: The Views of the American Auto Industry on the Upcoming Surface Transportation Reauthorization.”

Based on reporting from the Union-Bulletin, the sessions will probe fuel economy and emissions mandates, tariffs, federal EV policy, new-vehicle pricing, and how automakers plan to navigate the next decade. Cruz frames the meeting as a long-overdue reality check on affordability.

“The average price of a car has more than doubled in the past decade,” said Cruz, blaming “onerous government-mandated technologies and radical environmental regulations.”

What’s Driving Up Costs?

No doubt, the average transaction price (ATP) of a new car is quite high these days. Data from Cox Automotive shows that it surpassed $50,000 in September.

A decade ago, that figure was in the low $30,000s. Notably, analysts think the shift is due to several factors, including, but not limited to, regulation. Inflation, tariffs, higher-end trims, and the introduction of more EVs all have a part to play.

Also: EVs Now Sell Faster Than Gas Cars In The Used Market

Republicans say policy changes earlier this year, including repealing federal EV mandates and CAFE targets under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, are steps toward lowering prices. However, Cruz argues lawmakers need to go further. This is all happening at a critical point in the U.S. automotive industry too.

The debate comes at a pivotal moment for the U.S. auto sector. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) faces renewal or renegotiation by July 1. If it lapses, the fallout alone could drive vehicle costs higher, regardless of any new legislation.

Source: Union-Bulletin

It’s no secret that the automotive industry is in the midst of a gigantic transformation. Tariffs, trade wars, and shifting consumer interests are all playing a role. Now, Tesla is working to end its reliance on Chinese-made components for U.S.-built cars.

It’s just the latest automaker to take this step, with GM reportedly doing the same, though it will take time for both companies to fully achieve their goals.

More: GM Quietly Told Suppliers To Ditch Chinese Parts And Now The Trouble Begins

According to a new report from the Wall Street Journal, Tesla earlier this year instructed suppliers to begin eliminating Chinese parts from every vehicle produced in the United States.

Evidently, it told them to get the job done within the next two years at most. If possible, it would like the shift to be done within the next year. Sources indicate that it’s already swapped out some Chinese components.

Tariffs and Timing

Several forces came together to make this happen. Tesla was already moving away from Chinese-sourced parts after the pandemic. Matters escalated this year when President Donald Trump imposed new tariffs on Chinese imports.

That created new volatility in an already fluctuating market, which affected Tesla’s pricing and procurement plans. According to the report, Tesla is working to build a business that is more resilient to political decisions.

Recently, a semiconductor conflict between China and the Netherlands triggered fresh supply interruptions at Tesla. Dutch chip maker, Nexperia, whose packaging happens in China, became tangled up in an export-blocking dispute, and as such, automakers like Tesla were caught up too.

New Routes Around China

Interestingly, Tesla has been encouraging Chinese suppliers to set up shop in Mexico and Southeast Asia for years. This could potentially allow Tesla to sidestep tariffs that are aimed solely at China itself. It also halted the use of Chinese-made lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries in favor of making them in Nevada next year.

Notably, Tesla isn’t the first automaker to go down this route. Earlier this year, GM quietly instructed its suppliers to cut out Chinese components altogether by 2027.

No doubt, these two companies won’t be the only ones to try this same trick. Only time will tell whether or not it actually works out, cuts costs, and brings more manufacturing to America.

Maintaining your own car has long been a badge of pride for some and a financial necessity for many others. Swapping fluids, filters, or brake pads is part of the standard weekend maintenance ritual for countless drivers.

But for one Hyundai Ioniq 5 N owner, that sense of self-reliance recently hit a wall, or more precisely, a brake caliper. He discovered that replacing the rear pads on his EV wasn’t as simple as it used to be. Now, Hyundai has responded.

More: Apparently You Need Hyundai’s Permission To Change Your Own Brakes

It might seem odd that someone has already burned through their rear pads, especially on an EV, but it happened because the owner drove this car the way Hyundai wants owners to: hard and on the track.

When he tried to replace these pads, he learned that he needed to retract the electronic parking brake. That’s where this easy DIY job took a scary turn.

When Maintenance Gets Complicated

One way to retract the brake is to use Hyundai’s Global Dynamic System (GDS). That software and the hardware that goes with it can cost almost $6,000, as we’ve seen online. Don’t worry, though, there’s another option called the J2534 Diagnostic Tool, which Hyundai supports, as seen in an official document discovered by TheDrive.

According to the owner, Redditor u/SoultronicPear, the software costs $60 a week (or less on average for longer time periods) and requires the use of a J2534 adapter that can be found for around $2,000.

Hyundai currently approves only three options for this tool: the CarDAQ Plus 3, Bosch’s MTS 6531 and DG Technologies’ d-briDGe PRO, adding that, “under no circumstances do we recommend the use of a
non-approved J2534 device”. So be warned.

Credentials Required

More importantly, beyond that, using the tool requires special National Automotive Service Task Force (NASTF) authentication and a constant internet connection.

But here’s the kicker. Only certified repair shops or repair businesses are supposed to get access to that software. NASTF told the owner that “NASTF credentials are for use by qualified technicians, mechanics or locksmiths working in businesses providing repair or replacement services.”

Hyundai Speaks Up

Before publishing our first coverage of this issue, we reached out to Hyundai for comment. After the story went live, the automaker responded with the following statement to Carscoops:

“Hyundai is committed to supporting both our dealer network and independent repair facilities with safe, secure, and accessible service solutions. For vehicles equipped with electronic parking brakes, including the Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 5 N, the official repair procedure requires placing the rear calipers in service mode using either our Global Diagnostic System (GDS) or the J2534 application.

This ensures proper functionality and customer safety. Hyundai recently expanded access through an update to our J2534 application, enabling aftermarket users to perform functions previously restricted by the GDS secure gateway.

While authentication through NASTF is required for sensitive operations, this step helps maintain security and accountability. Our official dealer tool (GDS) is also available for purchase by anyone. Hyundai is actively exploring ways to make routine maintenance easier for all customers while upholding safety standards.

We appreciate the interest in DIY repairs and will continue working toward solutions that balance convenience with security.”

Seeking more detail, we pushed Hyundai to clarify whether a skilled owner could realistically do the job at home. The company followed up with this explanation:

“DIYers can replace brake pads on the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Ioniq 5 N, but it requires specific steps and tools. Because these vehicles use electronic parking brakes, the rear calipers must be placed in service mode using either Hyundai’s Global Diagnostic System (GDS) or the J2534 application with a compatible pass-through device.

Both tools are publicly available, though GDS is more expensive and J2534 requires NASTF authentication for secure functions. Without these tools, the job cannot be done safely, as manual retraction could damage components.

Hyundai is not restricting DIY repairs, in fact, recent updates have expanded access, and we continue to explore ways to make routine maintenance easier while maintaining safety and security.”

---

So, yes, it can be done. But unless you already own the specialized tools or have deep pockets, the process can cost about as much as a tired old hatchback from the classifieds.

For now, at least until a cheaper workaround surfaces (we’re looking into it, so stay tuned), the Ioniq 5 N’s rear brakes may remain one of those maintenance jobs probably best left to the professionals.

The used-car market was absolutely red hot for a few years after 2019, driven by pandemic-related shortages that sent prices soaring across the board. It dipped in 2023 and has steadily been gaining momentum, with both demand and average transaction prices (ATP) creeping upward ever since.

More: Everyone’s Buying Pickup Trucks, But Almost No One’s Using Them That Way

Now, the third quarter of 2025 has seen a slight shift. As prices continue to increase, buyers are taking their time more than in recent history. In another strange turn, EVs are now rolling off dealer lots faster than internal-combustion models.

According to data collected by Edmunds, the average three-year-old car spent 41 days on dealer lots in the third quarter. That’s up from 37 days last year, marking the slowest “days-to-turn” pace since 2017.

Why the Slowdown?

The most likely reason is the ongoing rise in transaction prices. The average price for a three-year-old car reached $31,067 in Q3 2025, a five percent increase from $29,578 a year ago, and nearly $10,000 higher than in 2017, when comparable used models hovered around $21,000.

Three-Year-Old Used Vehicle Pricing And Turn Rates

Edmunds

That price climb means buyers are weighing their options more carefully, comparing used models to new ones that often include incentives and warranties. The last time that used cars carried an ATP of over $30,000 was 2022, when pandemic-era shortages drove demand through the roof.

Now that supply shortages have mostly faded into memory, shoppers seem more inclined to pause and weigh their choices before finally deciding to buy.

What’s Selling Fastest?

Not every aspect of the market is cooling, though. EVs have quietly become the fastest-selling segment of the used market. They’re averaging just 34 days on the lot.

Avg Days to Turn by Powertrain (3-Year-Old Vehicles, Q3 2025)

Edmunds

Hybrids take 40 days, diesels take 41, and gas vehicles take 43. Plug-in hybrids actually take the longest at 47 days before a sale. No doubt, lower mileage and attractive pricing play a role here.

EV Momentum

Used EVs sold during Q3 averaged 35,661 miles and a transaction price of $29,911. Nearly two-thirds of all three-year-old EVs were priced within the $20,000 and $30,000 range. Across the rest of the used-car market, only 42 percent fall between those two prices.

EVs in that range also tend to show less wear since roughly 66 percent have fewer than 40,000 miles on the odometer. Essentially, EVs are providing the best value in the used market at the moment. At the same time, they make up just 1.6 percent of total used inventory.

Despite limited availability of 2022 EV models, they still represented eight of the 19 fastest-selling three-year-old vehicles, reflecting growing shopper interest even as demand for new ones cools. The deals are out there; they just might be hard to find.

EVs like the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Volkswagen ID.4, and Ford Mustang Mach-E offer substantial savings compared with their original sticker prices, often undercutting new examples by more than $25,000. On the flip side, ICE cars such as the Toyota GR Supra and Lexus NX 350h have held their value surprisingly well

19 Fastest-Selling Models in Q3 2025

Edmunds

We’ve all heard the stereotype: electric truck owners are latte-sipping tech bros cruising around in Rivian R1Ts or Tesla Cybertrucks to look adventurous rather than be adventurous. It’s an easy image to picture – clean trucks, unscuffed tires, not a hint of mud in sight. No doubt, the entire truck market is far too full of folks who own them but don’t use them.

That’s an entirely different topic we’ve already covered. Today, we focus in on another truth that data has unveiled. It’s not just “real” truck folks that are hauling and off-roading. EV truck owners behave almost exactly like their gas-powered counterparts.

Also: Everyone’s Buying Pickup Trucks, But Almost No One’s Using Them That Way

Carscoops obtained data from Strategic Vision, a company that surveys some 250,000 people annually about the way they use their vehicles. That data paints a very clear picture of where truck drivers take their rides, what they do with them, and how size and powertrain affect those figures.

Who’s Actually Getting Dirty?

For example, off-roading is a hobby that around one in every three truck owners enjoys. 31 percent of alternative powertrain (ATP) truck owners report doing light off-roading. Think gravel or dirt roads, at least once a month.

That’s nearly identical to the 29 percent of standard truck (think Toyota Tacoma) owners who report the same. What about full-size truck owners? 32 percent of them take to the dirt or gravel at least once a month.

Off-Roading Activity by Truck Type

When the trail gets harder to cope with, the data doesn’t change much either. Serious off-road terrain, like rocks, mud, and streams, is the playground for 11 percent of ATP truck owners once a month or more. 13 percent of standard truck owners and 15 percent of full-size truck owners say the same.

Put another way, electric truck owners aren’t babying their rigs. If anything, they’re using them just as often for weekend adventures as those of ICE-powered ones. Perhaps the most interesting data in the entire lump that we collected is how heavy-duty truck owners differ from everybody else.

Those drivers are significantly more likely to do both types of off-roading that we’ve discussed. That tracks since these folks are often hauling equipment into fields, farms, and job sites.

Truck Bed Utility and Driving Behavior

Hauling Habits

Speaking of hauling, it’s another place where we see clear evidence that EV truck owners don’t just drive as though they’re in a crossover or car. Data shows that 64 percent of them use their bed to haul something at least once a month.

In fact, they do it more often than standard truck owners at 58 percent and full-size pickup owners at 61 percent, though obviously less than heavy-duty truck owners, who lead the pack at 74 percent.

More: America’s Truck Tariffs Just Opened A New Trade Front

On top of that, driving purely for enjoyment is common across all three core segments, with 89 to 90 percent of owners saying they do it regularly, while heavy-duty truck owners come in slightly lower, but still high at 82 percent.

No doubt, APT truck owners tow less frequently than combustion engine classes. That makes sense given the big issues with towing range, charging infrastructure, and charging speed. But when it comes to everyday utility, APT pickup drivers are putting their trucks to work.

Electric, But Every Bit a Truck

This data undercuts one of the most persistent cultural divides in the pickup world. For years, EV truck buyers have been portrayed as outsiders. Newcomers who love the look and lifestyle of a truck but not the dirt under the fingernails. The numbers suggest otherwise.

Also: Your Green Plug-in Hybrid Is An Eco Sham, Study Finds

Whether it’s a Ford Lightning hauling mulch, a Rivian R1T chasing forest service roads, or even a Cybertruck owner heading for a campsite, electric truck drivers are proving that capability isn’t defined by what’s under the hood, but how the truck gets used.

So while the stereotype might linger in comment sections, the evidence is clear: EV truck owners aren’t replacing trucks with toys. They’re just redefining what it means to be a truck owner.

Truck Owner Usage Summary

Automotive enthusiasts aren’t the only ones who enjoy getting their hands dirty. Many regular drivers tackle oil changes, swap air filters, or fit new brake pads without a second thought. These are the sorts of jobs that make you feel connected to your car, a small ritual of maintenance and pride.

But every so often, a manufacturer decides to make things harder than they need to be. I once had to drop an entire subframe on my BMW just to replace oxygen sensors, an experience that left me wondering whether the engineers had ever tried it themselves.

Also: His Ioniq 5 N Turned Into A Paperweight Months Ago And Hyundai Still Has No Answers

It’s rare to see a mainstream brand like Hyundai put similar hurdles on its customers when it comes to repairs. However, according to one owner, the brand isn’t just making a simple fix hard; it’s straight up declaring war on his (and your) right to repair his own car.

Is Hyundai Denying Right to Repair?

Two recent posts on Reddit’s r/Ioniq5N community have ignited a fierce debate. There, an owner claims Hyundai has drawn the battle lines. He’d set out to replace his rear brake pads, something he says he’s done countless times before on other vehicles, but soon discovered the automaker’s diagnostic tools had other plans.

According to the post, Hyundai’s digital systems effectively lock out anyone who isn’t a certified technician from performing even basic maintenance.

The rear brake pads are affected by the electric parking brake. To replace them, one must disengage the brake and get it to retract completely, otherwise, the new pads won’t fit. In addition, the car needs a diagnostic tool to recalibrate the motor on how far to move with the new pads in place.

In other words, even if you could manually disengage the parking brake, the car would still need calibration to work properly.

More: Rivian Refused To Sell JerryRigEverything A 12V Battery Then Sent Him The Bill

The only way to accomplish this is allegedly to use Hyundai’s J2534 Diagnostic Tool, a Windows-based application available only through the automaker’s tech info portal.

The owner says the software requires a $60 weekly subscription, a $2,000+ approved hardware adapter, and a constant internet connection for authentication. Even then, it reportedly doesn’t work properly on newer models like the 2025 Ioniq 5 N.

No DIYers, Please – Only Pros

“I broke down and bought the subscription and special adapter,” the owner wrote. “Guess what? It didn’t work.” Only later did they find out why. “My blood is boiling at the moment. NASTF has blocked my account, saying “DIYers are not permitted access.”

They included a photo of a message from NASTF that says in part, “Please provide your business name and 9-digit Federal Employer Identification Number. DIYers are not permitted access.”

The irony, the poster points out, is that Hyundai dealers don’t even use this Windows tool. They reportedly have access to an entirely different Android-based software suite that works seamlessly.

While this all sounds like a bureaucratic mess, the underlying issue raises serious questions about Right to Repair access in the EV era. For decades, enthusiasts and independent mechanics have fought for access to diagnostic tools and repair data that manufacturers often guard tightly.

But when basic wear items like brake pads require proprietary authentication, the argument takes on a new urgency.

Has Hyundai Gone Too Far?

Nothing about this setup sounds reasonable. Replacing brake pads is as fundamental as car maintenance gets, yet Hyundai’s system allegedly makes it feel like breaking into Fort Knox.

If that’s true, the automaker has some serious rethinking to do because locking out the people who care most about maintaining their vehicles isn’t a good long-term strategy.

I have personally considered buying an Ioniq 5 and a Kia EV6, but will avoid both until this sort of thing is doable for folks like me. Hyundai tells us that it’s looking into the situation and will report back once it has more information.