Blue Bird Corporation announced its pending acquisition of the remaining 50-percent equity interest in Micro Bird, a joint venture with Canadian bus manufacturer Girardin Minibus. The $198.2 million deal, which values Micro Bird at $429.6 million, is expected to close by the end of the second quarter, pending regulatory approval and customary closing conditions.
The Micro Bird brand originated in the mid-1970s, when Blue Bird introduced its first Type A school bus built on a cutaway van chassis. Blue Bird entered a supply agreement with Girardin Minibus in 1992 to build the Micro Bird in Quebec. The most recent joint venture between Blue Bird and Girardin was signed in 2009, which created Micro Bird, Inc.
The transaction announced Tuesday is funded through a combination of 70-percent stock and 30-percent cash. It includes the $16.5 million purchase of Micro Bird’s new manufacturing facility in Plattsburgh, New York and the transfer of its OEM service parts inventory for $400,000, according to a company presentation on the deal strategy and structure. Blue Bird said it plans to issue 2.7 million shares to fund the stock portion and use $154.2 million in cash for the remainder.
Blue Bird said the acquisition is expected to enhance the company’s market share in the K-12 student transportation industry by expanding its product portfolio to include a comprehensive lineup of Type A, C and D buses powered by diesel, gas, propane, and electric powertrains. The deal will also double Micro Bird’s addressable market in the U.S., thanks to its compliance with Buy America requirements, and strengthen Blue Bird’s presence in Canada.
The transaction is projected to be immediately accretive to earnings, with an estimated 8.2 percent increase in earnings per share in fiscal year 2026. Blue Bird’s pro forma revenue is expected to grow from $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion, while adjusted EBITDA is forecasted to increase from $225 million to $250 million. The company said it anticipates long-term revenue growth to reach $2.5 billion by 2030, with an EBITDA margin exceeding 15 percent.
Micro Bird, known for its high-quality school, commercial and electric buses, is well-positioned for long-term growth. Blue Bird said the acquisition will enable it to leverage Micro Bird’s expertise in electric vehicle technology, streamline development and expand into adjacent markets such as commercial and specialty vehicles as well as drive engineering efficiencies, enhance market share, and deliver value to shareholders through profitable growth and stock buybacks.
BMW M is planning to introduce around 30 models by 2029.
This includes new and facelifted M or M Performance vehicles.
The future of the manual looks bleak, given low global demand.
Last year, BMW announced a major product blitz that will see the company introduce over 40 new or updated vehicles by 2027. Unsurprisingly, BMW M is working on a major offensive of their own.
Speaking to CarSales, BMW M CEO Frank van Meel said “We’re working on up to 30 new models that will come out in the next two and a half years.” That’s a lot, but it’s important to note the number includes both M and M Performance vehicles.
While the executive didn’t say what to expect, other than the i3 M, spy photographers have snapped an assortment of prototypes in recent months. Besides the facelifted M5 and M5 Touring, the company is working on a new M3 and iX3 M.
They’ll be joined by redesigned versions of the X5, X6, and X7, which will spawn a mix of M and M Performance variants. We can also expect M Performance versions of the facelifted 7-Series.
The Rise Of M Performance EVs
Speaking of M Performance variants, van Meel said electrified models – such as the i4 M60 – have proven popular in countries where regulations on combustion engines make traditional performance cars expensive. As he noted, “In France, you have to pay 18,000 euros ($21,212) CO2 tax on a combustion engine M2.”
That’s ridiculously steep and it bodes well for the upcoming i3 M, which will feature a quad motor powertrain. However, the executive said he isn’t sure how customers will respond to the model. While only time will tell, van Meel believes the vehicle has “exactly the technology everyone has been waiting for … in a high-performance [electric] car.”
Despite the focus on electric vehicles, BMW M isn’t putting all its eggs in one basket. Quite the opposite as the executive said they have a “long tradition” of six- and eight-cylinder engines, and “we are planning to continue this because we have a big community worldwide, and also a lot of people that are maybe not ready yet, or live in environments where it’s really difficult, to charge the electric cars.”
Manual Seems Doomed
While internal combustion engines are sticking around, the manual might not be as lucky. As van Meel explained, “From an engineering standpoint, the manual doesn’t really make sense because it limits you in torque and also in fuel consumption.”
However, he added that from an emotional and customer standpoint, “a lot of people still love manuals, so that’s why we kept them, and we intend to keep them as long as possible.”
Unfortunately, the clock appears to be ticking as he said “It’s going to be quite difficult, in the future, to develop completely new gearboxes because the segment in the market is quite small, and the suppliers are not so keen on doing something like that.” This means manual transmissions will likely be safe for the “next couple of years,” but it will likely become “difficult to keep the manuals alive, especially in the next decade.”
EV owner satisfaction has reached an all-time high.
Best models come from Tesla, BMW, and Cadillac.
Most EV owners would consider getting another one.
Electric vehicles have come a long way in the past few years, and the progress is finally showing up where it matters most: in owner satisfaction. According to the latest data, these steady gains in technology and infrastructure are translating into record-high approval from drivers.
That’s the verdict from JD Power’s 2026 U.S. Electric Vehicle Experience Ownership Study, which found premium EV satisfaction climbed from 756 points last year to 789 in 2026. Mainstream EVs also improved two points to hit 727 out of 1,000.
The highest rated premium EVs were the Tesla Model 3 (804), Tesla Model Y (797), and BMW i4 (795). On the flip side, the new Audi Q6 e-tron came in dead last at 690. It placed well below the Lucid Air (740) and Rivian R1T (739).
Segment Standouts And Stragglers
On the mass market side of the equation, the Ford Mustang Mach-E took top honors with a score of 760. The electric pony car was followed by the Hyundai Ioniq 6 (748) and Kia EV9 (745). Interestingly, the two lowest rated EVs were the Chevrolet Blazer EV (711) and Honda Prologue (623). That’s a huge point spread considering both models are built by GM and have a lot in common.
Of course, things aren’t completely straightforward as the study examined ten different factors. This includes the “accuracy of stated battery range, availability of public charging stations, battery range, cost of ownership, driving enjoyment, ease of charging at home, interior and exterior styling, safety and technology features, service experience, and vehicle quality and reliability.”
Encouragingly, 96 percent of EV owners said they would consider buying or leasing another one and the study also found quality has improved. That’s especially true of premium EVs, which had 15.9 fewer problems per 100 vehicles compared to last year. This brought the total down to 75 and JD Power said this was driven by noise improvements as well as fewer problems with driver assistance technology.
Is Charging Still A Concern?
The study also found that EV drivers are becoming more satisfied with public charging. Scores climbed by over 100 points and this is being attributed to growing charging infrastructure as well as the opening of Tesla’s Supercharger network to other automakers.
Last but not least, EV drivers are more satisfied than those with plug-in hybrids. Premium EVs scored 114 points higher than their PHEV rivals, while mainstream electric vehicles had a 117 point advantage. Part of this can be chalked up to the cost of ownership as plug-in hybrid drivers have to deal with a more complex powertrain that involves gas and electricity.
In a statement, JD Power’s Brent Gruber said “Improvements in battery technology, charging infrastructure and overall vehicle performance have driven customer satisfaction to its highest level ever. What’s more, the vast majority of current EV owners say they will consider purchasing another EV for their next vehicle, regardless of whether they benefited from the now-expired federal tax credit.”
Tesla says the first Cybercab has left the Texas line.
Musk still targets a sub-$30,000 version by 2027.
Milestone revived MKBHD’s viral head-shaving bet.
Don’t look now, but Tesla might actually be on schedule, if not slightly ahead, at least for now, with its Cybercab program. The automaker says the first production example rolled off the line on Tuesday, more than a month earlier than Elon Musk previously suggested. Its CEO also confirmed pricing.
Of course, plenty of hurdles remain if Tesla plans to sell one before the end of the decade. And yes, at least one major YouTuber could end up shaving his head if Musk’s team pulls it off.
Tesla posted a photo on February 17 showing the team at Gigafactory Texas surrounding the first production Cybercab. While there’s still no clear timetable for full-scale production, Musk previously indicated that manufacturing wouldn’t even begin until April. I double-checked my calendar, and it still says February.
Importantly, this is almost certainly a pilot build and not a car destined for a customer. That said, it’s a significant step forward for a brand often associated with shifting timelines.
Public Bets And Pricing
That reputation likely played a role in Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) saying in 2024 that if Tesla launched the car before 2027 at a price below $30,000, he’d shave his head on camera.
After Tesla announced the milestone, meme versions of a bald MKBHD quickly spread across X. Musk joined in, replying “Gonna happen 😂” to one such post. In a separate exchange, he also confirmed that Tesla still plans to sell a consumer version of the Cybercab before 2027 for “$30,000 or less”.
Hurdles Ahead
That all sounds promising, but Tesla has to do more than simply build the car. The Cybercab is meant to be the brand’s first true autonomous vehicle sold without a steering wheel or pedals. Since unveiling it, however, Tesla has hinted that those controls could return if regulations require them.
And that’s where the real challenge begins. Federal vehicle safety standards assume a human driver is present, and insurance frameworks do too. The NHTSA may need to grant exemptions for certain rules, while individual states could impose their own restrictions on autonomous vehicles operating on public roads.
In other words, building the Cybercab might prove easier than getting it legally approved. Whether Tesla can clear those hurdles before 2027 remains an open question.
CHP warned cold weather drains EV batteries faster.
The alert came after a Rivian R1S ran out of charge.
The incident took place in snowy Truckee, California.
California is known for its beach vibes, but the state’s climate offers a little bit of everything. That’s especially true in the mountain town of Truckee, which reportedly received more than 10 inches of snow in the past 24 hours.
While snow is a fact of life in the Sierra Nevadas, some people aren’t used to the cold conditions. That appears to include a Rivian R1S driver, who discovered how weather can impact range.
On Facebook, the California Highway Patrol posted a short clip of an R1S that apparently ran out of juice in the middle of a snow covered intersection. Authorities didn’t say what happened, but the video was accompanied by a message saying “Cold weather drains batteries faster than you think. If you’re rolling over the Summit, make sure your charge level matches your confidence level.”
They also advised drivers to charge up, slow down, and carry snow chains. While that’s a good reminder, police appeared to mock EVs and the driver as the post was tagged #ItsElectric and #MakeGoodDecisions.
Last week, they joked about a Tesla driver who lost control and went down an embankment. In that post, they said “Chain control was lifted earlier this morning and some of you took that as a personal challenge to full send anyway.” It was accompanied by an assortment of tags including #MakeGoodDecisions, #DonnersGonnaDonner, and #SlowYourRoll.
This appears to be a common theme with the Truckee post, but the criticism isn’t limited to EV drivers. Some people seem to get a kick out of this as one popular comment was “My new winter goal is to not be featured on your social media page.”
Chain control was lifted earlier this morning and some of you took that as a personal challenge to full send anyway….
A touchless car wash tore off a Rivian R1T roof panel.
Clips and adhesive were ripped loose in the incident.
Repairs may require interior trim removal for access.
A Rivian R1T owner has just learned the hard way that “touchless” does not mean “harmless.” Sure, these washes skip the spinning brushes, but that does not make them gentle. As it turns out, high-pressure water and moving hardware can still do a number on a six-figure electric pickup.
Posting on Reddit, the owner says he recently took his R1T through a touchless car wash for the first time when a black plastic panel at the rear of the EV’s roof suddenly popped off. That panel covers a fair bit of electronic gubbins, including the antenna, and is secured with clips and adhesive. Obviously, it is meant to stay put.
Photos show several of those clips torn loose, with adhesive strips peeled back as if the truck had tried to shed its own roof trim. It would be easy to blame water pressure or the industrial-strength dryers at the end of the tunnel, but that does not appear to be what happened.
According to the owner, one of the wash’s spraying arms became lodged under the roof panel, apparently misjudging the height of the pickup. Instead of gliding past, it hooked underneath and pried the piece upward. Not exactly part of the premium wash package.
Some commenters on the Reddit thread suggest that in order for Rivian to repair the rear roof panel, it’s possible that part of the interior will have to be removed to gain access to all of the wires positioned beneath the panel. Additionally, the third brake light of the R1T is positioned directly above the rear window near this panel, and may also need to be replaced.
Then there’s the matter of who will end up paying for the repairs. The owner says the car wash’s insurance will cover the costs, though that likely means a round of negotiations between insurers before any money changes hands. In the meantime, the damaged truck could spend weeks, possibly longer, waiting in a body shop bay for parts and repairs. So much for a quick rinse.
Tesla drops Autopilot term in California to avoid license suspension.
Brand’s new models now only come with cruise control as standard.
EV buyers are being pushed towards $99 FSD subscriptions instead.
After years of sparring with California regulators, Tesla has agreed to stop using its famous Autopilot term in the state, neatly sidestepping a 30-day suspension that would have frozen sales in its biggest US market with nearly 180,000 deliveries last year.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) wasn’t amused by Tesla’s marketing language, arguing that phrases like “Autopilot” and “Full Self Driving Capability”, later softened to “Full Self-Driving (Supervised)”, gave buyers the impression their cars could drive themselves. The DMV pointed out that they can’t now, and never could, operate as autonomous vehicles.
The formal accusations were filed in 2023, though regulators traced the issue back to marketing language used as early as May 2021. At the time, Tesla described its system as capable of handling short and long-distance trips with no action required by the person in the driver’s seat, a claim the DMV said crossed a legal line.
60 Days To Find A Fix
A judge agreed and proposed suspending Tesla’s dealer and manufacturer licenses for a month. That would have been awkward timing for a company trying to convince the world that robotaxis are just around the corner. The DMV offered Tesla 60 days to fix the issue before the suspension started, and instead of digging in, Tesla wisely took corrective action.
“The DMV is committed to safety throughout all California’s roadways and communities,” said DMV Director Steve Gordon. “The department is pleased that Tesla took the required action to remain in compliance with the State of California’s consumer protections.”
So Autopilot, as a marketing term, is now gone in California (though you’ll still find it on the brand’s EVs elsewhere in the world). The company had already softened Full Self Driving into Full Self Driving Supervised to make it crystal clear that, no, the car is not fully autonomous. By complying with the deadline, Tesla avoided the suspension and kept the revenue rolling in.
Autopilot Feature Phased Out
This is not just a word swap, though. We reported last month that Tesla had already begun phasing out the previously standard Autopilot system on its cars, replacing it with Traffic Aware Cruise Control and pushing buyers toward a $99 per month Full Self Driving subscription.
Lane centering that rivals include as standard now lives behind a paywall, and CEO Elon Musk has hinted that the subscription price could rise over time. From a business perspective, it’s clever, but from a branding perspective, it looks like a climbdown.
Autopilot was one of Tesla’s most recognizable terms, though it was also one due to be left behind in the coming years as the far more sophisticated FSD improves to the point where it really can deliver full self-driving.
Jony Ive admits anxiety before the Luce’s big reveal.
Ferrari’s first EV pursues a singular, radical design.
It debuts in May ahead of its planned 2028 launch.
Ferrari is no stranger to controversy, and it rarely shies away from it either. Its upcoming all-electric Luce could turn out to be the most polarizing project yet. The man behind the design, Jony Ive, Apple’s former design chief who shaped the iPhone and several other era-defining products, admits he is feeling the pressure.
That seems like a perfectly reasonable response with a historic unveiling just two months away, especially when you are tasked with redefining what a Ferrari is supposed to be in the modern era.
This isn’t just another EV launch after all. It is Ferrari, a brand built on racing at the highest levels and on exciting V12 supercars, sometimes only obtainable through wild buying rituals, and now venturing into the silent world of EVs.
A Defining Electric Debut
SHProshots
Calling it a big deal would be a massive understatement, which is probably why Ferrari hired Ive and fellow designer Marc Newson for the task of shaping the Luce.
The exterior, in fact, has been penned by LoveFrom, the design house founded by Ive and Australian designer Newson, which makes this less a routine Ferrari project and more a collision between Maranello and Silicon Valley minimalism.
Speaking to Autocar, Ive openly admitted that he’s “anxious” about revealing the car to the world. It’s not concern over the design itself that sparks that feeling, but instead the gravity of just how big this moment is for Ferrari. He called it “still clearly a Ferrari,” but went on to say that “It’s a different manifestation based on some of the beliefs around simplicity and the inherent beauty of something.”
On the flip side, his co-designer, Newson, highlighted the freedom offered with such a project. “One of the great and serendipitous sort of things is that this is an electric vehicle, the first electric Ferrari, right? So that afforded us a degree of freedom that perhaps we would otherwise have not had: literal physical freedom or creative freedom… on many levels here,” he said.
Inside The Luce Philosophy
At this stage, we’ve already seen official bits of the interior. The brand unveiled the dash earlier this month. It’s quite the departure from other modern Ferraris. That’s key because Ive and Newson say that the entire car has a “consistency and a singularity” about it.
Ive has also stressed that there is “no disconnection” between the exterior and interior, noting that both were designed simultaneously rather than by separate departments. In his view, that approach results in a complete package that feels cohesive rather than pieced together.
What we also know so far is that the Luce will be a four-door, four-seat GT with a ride height similar to the Purosangue, and that it will feature a 1000hp four-motor powertrain. Ive has hinted that the car will be “big” in its proportions and just as radical on the outside as it is within.
Will The Luce Use Rear-Hinged Doors?
SHProshots
To that end, we wonder if the exterior will be far more retro-futurist than previously expected. While Ive was talking about the new Luce, our spies caught another heavily disguised prototype undergoing testing in northern Sweden this week.
Like earlier Luce testers, this one was wrapped in makeshift panels from top to bottom, making it extremely difficult to interpret what is happening underneath beyond a general sense of its proportions and size.
One detail our photographers did catch appears to be a set of door handles, circled in red, positioned just under the B-column in the middle section. According to our photographer, the Luce may be using suicide-style rear doors that open toward the front of the vehicle, similar to the Purosangue. This has not been officially confirmed, and it could just as easily be Ferrari engaging in a bit of cheeky misdirection.
We will know for certain in May, when Ferrari finally unveils its first EV.
A more practical Polestar 4 wagon arrives this year.
A new Polestar 2 and 7 SUV will also join the range.
Polestar may be wrestling with the sort of losses that keep finance teams awake at night, but it is not backing off. The Geely-owned brand has four new EVs lined up before 2028, each aimed at the market’s sweet spots. On the way are the 5 grand tourer, a more practical wagon take on the 4, a fully reworked 2 sedan, and an all-new 7 compact SUV. Busy times ahead.
The “Wagon” Polestar 4
Polestar’s current best seller is the 4, though its coupe-style roofline has always leaned more toward drama than practicality. That changes in the fourth quarter of 2026, when a new variant arrives with roof rails and a redesigned tail, complete with an actual rear window. Revolutionary, we know.
The aim is to attract a “wider customer base”, which is executive-speak for people who enjoy seeing out the back.
CEO Michael Lohscheller says the updated 4 “combines the space of an estate and the versatility of an SUV with the dynamic performance that is Polestar”. In plain terms, it keeps the same underpinnings as today’s car but swaps in a reshaped silhouette and a roomier cabin. Same bones, more boots-and-dogs potential.
The Next-Gen Polestar 2
Next up is a full new generation of the Polestar 2, due in early 2027. The current Tesla Model 3 rival has been around since 2019 and received a mid-lifecycle update in 2023, so a deeper rethink feels timely.
An official, albeit blurry, teaser suggests the 2 will trade its slightly crossover-ish stance for something lower and sleeker, complete with split LED headlights and a pared-back bumper design. Less high-riding fastback, more grounded sports saloon. Or at least that seems to be the direction of travel.
Europe-Built Compact SUV
Then there is the Polestar 7, landing in 2028 as a contender in Europe’s largest EV segment. And yes, Polestar’s naming scheme remains mildly baffling. It will be built in Slovakia and share its hardware with Volvo models. Lohscheller describes it as a “progressive performance-driven car” offered at “a very attractive price point”.
The Grand Tourer Is Here
At the top of the tree sits the Polestar 5 grand tourer, which only reinforces the point about that confusing nomenclature. Revealed in production form at the 2025 Munich Motor Show, it is scheduled to begin European deliveries in summer 2026. This is the halo car, the statement piece.
It rides on a lightweight bonded aluminum platform and, in Performance guise, packs a dual-motor setup producing up to 872 hp (650 kW / 884 PS). That is comfortably in the realm of serious performance, and proof that Polestar still wants to talk about speed as much as sustainability.
Optimism Despite Heavy Losses
All of this comes against a complicated financial backdrop. Last year, Polestar posted its best-ever retail sales, shifting 60,119 vehicles, up 34 percent, while also wrestling with deepening losses.
Even so, the mood at the top remains upbeat. Despite what Lohscheller calls a “challenging geopolitical and economic environment”, he remains optimistic about the future: “We are targeting the heart of the EV market, where customer demand and profit pools are high.” Confident words. Now comes the hard part.
PROS ›› Genuinely quick, nimble handling, faithful design features CONS ›› Tight rear seating, Uncharted undercuts it, limited cargo space
A quick look around the automotive industry would have most thinking that EV adoption is slowing down. Whether that perception holds true or not, Toyota is moving ahead full steam with not one, but three new electric vehicles, and the C-HR might be the most playful of the bunch. Yesterday, we talked about how the bZ Woodland is a great improvement on the old bZ4x.
Today, the focus shifts to the C-HR, a revived nameplate that now returns exclusively as an EV. It’s a huge deal beyond just the fact that it’s going electric. It’s the first formerly gas-powered Toyota nameplate to go fully electric. Sure, it only beat the new Highlander by a few months, but that’s more than enough. Both will have a big impact on Toyota moving forward.
While we don’t know what the Highlander will end up selling for, the C-HR is clearly aimed at a different demographic. With a starting price shy of $38,000 before destination and handling, it’s aimed at Tesla Model Y buyers wanting something a touch smaller. Packing standard all-wheel drive, 338 hp (252 kW), and almost 300 miles of range, it’s a new face in the segment that will no doubt blow up one day.
Quick Facts
› Model:
2026 Toyota C-HR
› Starting Price:
$37,000 (excluding destination)
› Dimensions:
177.9 L x 73.6 W x 63.8 in H (4,519 x 1,870 x 1,621 mm)
› Wheelbase:
108.3 in (2,751 mm)
› Curb Weight:
4,322 lbs (1,960 kg)
› Powertrain:
Dual electric motors / 74.7 kWh battery
› Output:
338 hp (252 kW)
› 0-60 mph
4.9 seconds
› Transmission:
Single speed
› Range:
Up to 287 Miles
› On Sale:
First-half of 2026
SWIPE
Now, all that’s left is to figure out if it’s good enough that it’ll gain a foothold for a long ride, or if it’s still a battery cell or two away from a fully-formed EV. Thankfully, a week of testing it in hilly Ojai, California, helped us figure out the good from the bad.
Styling
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
Let’s not play coy. While the C-HR’s nomenclature has always invited comparisons to Honda’s HR-V, the exterior designs couldn’t have been much more different when it first arrived. We’re happy to report that the same playful attitude carries over to this new electric version of the crossover.
The front end adopts Toyota’s newer hammerhead design language, with a low, aggressive nose and slim lights that visually widen the car. The coupe-like roofline flows cleanly into the rear, and from certain angles, the C-HR almost looks more hatchback than crossover, which works in its favor. It feels athletic despite being clearly compromised on that front.
Compared to the bZ Woodland, the C-HR looks tighter and more urban. It’s clearly aimed at buyers who want something sporty and expressive rather than rugged or adventurous. The wheel options help sell that image, too, with 18-inch alloys on the SE and aggressive 20-inch wheels on higher trims.
If the old C-HR was bold but polarizing, this one is more mature. It’s still stylish, but it’s less desperate for attention and more apt to provide an experience worthy of an offbeat appearance.
Cabin Space
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
Toyota told us early on that we’d see a lot of crossover between this and the bZ Woodland, and it was right. It leverages supportive front seats, an intuitive infotainment setup, a steering wheel that feels good in your hands, and visibility that’s better than the sloping roofline suggests. The driver’s position feels good, though; we’d love a little more adjustability from the steering wheel.
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
The 14-inch touchscreen dominates the dashboard and comes standard across the lineup. It’s responsive, cleanly laid out, and avoids the over-complicated UI issues that plague some competitors. Dual wireless charging pads and practical storage touches reinforce that Toyota still knows how to design for daily life.
Material quality is a step up from Toyota’s earlier EV efforts, too. Soft-touch surfaces and ambient lighting keep things modern without crossing into gimmicky territory. And then you climb into the rear seats. Things go from perfectly livable to suddenly only for the smallest around us.
How Tight Is Too Tight?
I get that as a taller-than-average guy, I won’t fit everywhere, but I was sincerely shocked at just how tight the back seats of the C-HR are. This is a compact crossover, and that’s clear as soon as we compare it to another new crossover in the form of the Mazda CX-5.
The Mazda has a wheelbase that is just 2.5 inches (63 mm) longer. Despite that, the CX-5 offers 7.7 inches (195 mm) of additional legroom, up to 2.8 inches of headroom, and in total over 10 cubic feet of extra space in the rear seats. Put simply, rear-seat occupants won’t be happy in the C-HR unless they’re relatively small. That said, they’ll fit kids just fine.
Cargo space fares better, with 25.3 cubic feet behind the rear seats and nearly 60 cubic feet with them folded. That’s perfectly usable for daily life, but the passenger packaging tells you clearly where Toyota’s priorities were.
Driving Impressions
Here’s where the plot thickens, in the best way possible. EVs are well-known for their instant torque, but that doesn’t automatically make one good to drive. The way the C-HR moves about the world is with more authority than one might expect. It’s sharp. The short wheelbase helps it manage bends with confidence. And the steering is more communicative than in the larger bZ Woodland.
Toyota claims 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds, and it absolutely feels believable. This thing moves… not with the aggressive chaos of a GR Corolla, but with the smooth, relentless urgency only an EV can deliver. In fact, this might be the quickest pseudo-practical car in Toyota’s lineup right now. It’s not trying to be a sports car, yet it’s faster in a straight line than many cars that are.
The low battery placement keeps the center of gravity down, and the chassis feels planted through corners. Steering is light but accurate enough that you want to push a little harder than you probably expected. There’s a maturity to the tuning. It’s composed, predictable, and easy to trust. The brakes are excellent, too.
The regenerative braking paddles let you adjust deceleration on the fly, which adds a layer of driver involvement often missing from mainstream EVs. It’s not revolutionary, but it does make the driving experience feel more interactive.
Ride quality strikes a nice balance, too. It’s firm enough to feel sporty without punishing you over rough pavement. The C-HR doesn’t feel like a small SUV pretending to be sporty. It just feels like a well-sorted EV with some genuine personality. No, it’s a far cry from a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or a Tesla Model Y Performance, but it’s the EV I’d pick from Toyota’s lineup if driving feel was all that mattered.
From a more practical standpoint, range tops out at 287 miles on the SE trim, dropping slightly with the larger wheels. Charging speeds max out at 150 kW DC fast charging. That’s enough to go from 10–80 percent in roughly 30 minutes under ideal conditions. As we’ve seen in the past, ideal conditions can be rare, but the inclusion of Tesla’s NACS port should help.
The C-HR lands in an increasingly crowded space, but its personality gives it, like the bZ Woodland, a unique angle. The Tesla Model Y remains the benchmark for space and usability. It’s roomier, more versatile, and easier to live with if rear-seat comfort matters. The Model 3, while technically a sedan, also beats the C-HR for rear-seat comfort despite looking smaller.
Frankly, comparing it on paper to most cars in the segment makes the C-HR look like a middling choice at best. Even pairing it against its badge-engineered sibling, the Subaru Uncharted, it costs more and isn’t available with front-wheel drive, which unlocks more range. That said, I’m not about to start complaining that we need more front-wheel drive cars.
Where the C-HR stands out is key, though. All-wheel drive is something that plenty of folks want and or need where they live. Second, it’s probably the easiest car in the segment to park, thanks to great sightlines and one of the shortest wheelbases here. That matters.
No, it’s not the quickest, cheapest, or most spacious. Instead, it’s leaning into the vibe of a compact, economical electric vehicle to the best of its ability in its current form. And that form just so happens to be quite attractive and fun.
The Verdict
Toyota just launched the new Highlander in all-electric form, which is a huge deal in itself, but let’s not forget that this new C-HR is the first formerly gas-powered Toyota to go all-EV in America. That’s also a big deal, and it makes this little commuter car an important inflection point in history.
To that end, it’s great to see that Toyota didn’t hold back here regarding performance. The C-HR is properly quick, genuinely fun to pilot, and even fun to look at. The front seats, infotainment, and overall driving position are all excellent, and on the road, it feels composed, lively, and far more engaging than many electric crossovers in its segment.
That said, it’s not without compromise. Rear-seat space is tight enough to be a real consideration, especially if you regularly carry adults. This is a crossover that prioritizes style and driving feel over maximum practicality. And honestly, that might be exactly the point. Here, the fun comes first, and the practicality, while important, comes in second place. Will it be a mix that sells well? Only time will tell.
New report cites unspecified “technical problems”.
Volkswagen has invested billions in the revival.
Volkswagen is spending billions on Scout’s rebirth, but things might not be going according to plan. Quite the opposite as a new report out of Germany claims the company is postponing the launch by a year.
A report from Spiegel attributes the delay on “technical problems,” although specifics are hazy and said to include a financial component. However, in a statement to The Drive, a spokesperson said “Scout Motors has not shared any timing or product update announcements.”
That sounds like a carefully worded response that doesn’t confirm or deny anything, only the fact they haven’t announced any updates. Regardless, the company’s website says initial production is targeted to begin in 2027.
Still, Scout gives themselves plenty of wiggle room as the launch date is accompanied by a disclaimer that reveals the timeline is “based on current projections and is subject to change.” The automaker goes on to say the “anticipated production date is an estimate and may be affected by various factors.”
While the brand is staying tight-lipped, Scout introduced updated Traveler and Terra concepts at the Los Angeles Auto Show last year. They were minor evolutions of the original models that were introduced in October of 2024 and more closely preview the production truck and SUV.
Scout has shared little about the vehicles recently, but they’ll be offered with electric and range-extended powertrains. The former will have a range of approximately 350 miles (563 km), while the latter increases that distance to more than 500 miles (805 km) thanks to a gas engine that acts as a generator.
The company has reportedly received over 150,000 refundable reservations and roughly 85 percent are said to be for the range-extended variant. However, there’s still a lot we don’t know about the vehicles and it appears they could be running behind schedule.
We discuss the potential impact of the national jobs report on school district budgets, the DOT’s non-domiciled CDL final rule and cutting-edge technology takeaways from the Geotab Connect conference.
“It’s all about service: I went from servicing my country to now servicing my community.” Bernando Brown, director of student transportation for DeKalb County School District in Georgia, shares how his military experience shaped his work ethic, leadership style and focus on training and mentorship. He also discusses handling retention, budgeting and operational challenges.
Before a school bus incident even happens, it’s important for student transportation professionals to be aware of federal safety recommendations and crash investigation procedures. Meg Sweeney from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will be at STN EXPO East to give attendees the latest updates.
Her session “NTSB Investigations & Recommendations: Lap/Shoulder Seat Belts to the School Bus Danger Zone” on March 31 wraps up the conference by outlining various facets of school bus crash investigations. She will discuss occupant protection, which will include NTSB recommendations on lap/shoulder seatbelts and their safety impact during crashes, and shed light on “Danger Zone” crashes, including incidents where vehicles struck stopped school buses or hit a pedestrian.
Sweeney will provide attendees with background on the NTSB and its mission to further safety for students and transportation staff. Attendees will also learn about how NTSB conducts investigations and what school districts can expect when NTSB investigators arrive on scene of a school bus crash.
She will also provide insights into NTSB school bus investigations of high-profile crashes and incidents, including one in Maine that killed a 5-year-old boy, who was dragged 280 feet after the school bus loading doors closed on his arm while he attempted to board. Sweeney also worked on the development of recently released urgent recommendations related to an August crash in Leander, Texas and the use of lap/shoulder seatbelts to prevent student injuries and fatalities.
Sweeney is an accident investigator and project manager in the NTSB’s Office of Highway Safety. She has also worked in the NTSB Safety Studies Division, where she studied child restraint safety, multi-passenger van safety and operator fatigue, as well as at the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
STN EXPO East will be held March 26-31 at the Embassy Suites by Hilton Charlotte Concord Golf Resort & Spa in Concord, North Carolina. Over the five-day conference, attendees will have access to the best in student transportation training, including hands-on training and events, educational sessions, product demonstration labs, green energy panel discussions, an inspirational keynote address, the STN EXPO Trade Show, the Ride and Drive at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and more. Register now at stnexpo.com/east.
MACON, Ga. – Blue Bird Corporation (Nasdaq: BLBD), the leader in electric and low-emission school buses, has signed an agreement to acquire Girardin Group’s stake in the 50/50 Micro Bird joint venture, thereby, taking full ownership of the enterprise. Blue Bird will pay approx. $200 million for Girardin’s joint venture share, with 30% in cash and 70% in Blue Bird common stock. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of calendar year 2026, pending fulfillment of various closing conditions and regulatory approvals. A slide presentation is available on the BLBD IR website (https://investors.blue-bird.com/) with additional details.
The acquisition demonstrates Blue Bird’s commitment to growth and market expansion. The transaction allows Blue Bird to consolidate its North America operations and unify its businesses under one team and brand, unlocking further value for customers and shareholders. Blue Bird will offer the broadest product portfolio of industry-leading Type A, C, and D school, multi-purpose, and commercial buses.
Blue Bird is the only vehicle manufacturer in North America to provide diesel, gasoline, propane, and electric powered buses, positioning the company to uniquely address market needs. With the acquisition, Blue Bird will also significantly increase its total addressable market (TAM) for the Buy America Act – compliant shuttle buses in North America, a segment which Micro Bird entered in the fall of 2025 with its Plattsburg, NY facility acquisition.
“With a nearly 100 year history, Blue Bird has emerged as an iconic brand and leader in student transportation. We are delighted to purchase Girardin’s stake in Micro Bird and to take full control of the joint venture. The acquisition strengthens our strategic position and supports Blue Bird’s long-term vision for innovation, operational performance, and sustained profitable growth,” said John Wyskiel, president and CEO of Blue Bird Corporation. “In addition, I’m looking forward to welcoming Steve Girardin to our Board along with his contributions to Blue Bird’s continued success.”
Following the close of the transaction, Blue Bird intends to add Steve Girardin to its Board of Directors, strengthening the Board with his proven leadership and decades of experience across the North American bus market.
“This year marks our 60th year as a small bus manufacturer and our successful partnership with Blue Bird,” said Steve Girardin, Micro Bird Chairman and Vice-President of the Girardin Group. “Together, we’ve driven technology, innovation and product excellence in the bus market with a reputation of serving our customers with distinction. I’m confident that Micro Bird will continue to thrive under the sole ownership of Blue Bird, marking a natural and strategically aligned transition that supports value creation for our customers, employees, and shareholders.”
Blue Bird and Girardin Group established Micro Bird as a 50/50 joint venture in 2009. Specialized in designing and manufacturing Type A school and commercial shuttle buses with capacities ranging from 9 to 36 passengers, Micro Bird has emerged as a leader in innovative, safe, and reliable transportation solutions. Today, Micro Bird offers gasoline, propane, and electric powered buses to its customers and employs approximately 960 team members at its Drummondville, Quebec, and Plattsburgh, N.Y. locations.
Piper Sandler & Co. served as exclusive financial advisor to Blue Bird on this transaction.
About Blue Bird Corporation:
Blue Bird (NASDAQ: BLBD) is recognized as a technology leader and innovator of school buses since its founding in 1927. Our dedicated team members design, engineer and manufacture school buses with a singular focus on safety, reliability, and durability. School buses carry the most precious cargo in the world – 25 million children twice a day – making them the most trusted mode of student transportation. The company is the proven leader in low- and zero-emission school buses with more than 25,000 propane, natural gas, and electric powered buses sold. Blue Bird is transforming the student transportation industry through cleaner energy solutions. For more information on Blue Bird’s complete product and service portfolio, visit www.blue-bird.com.
About Girardin Group:
Girardin Group is a third-generation family business and longtime partner of Blue Bird Corporation specializing in bus and school bus transportation for more than 65 years and having its head office in Drummondville, Quebec. Girardin is a manufacturer, distributor, and operator of buses, school buses, electric powertrains and electric charging infrastructures. It provides the widest selection of electric school buses together with individualized charging infrastructure assistance. The company’s more than 40 operating divisions employ more than 3,000 team members in Canada and the United States. For more information on Girardin, visit https://www.girardinbluebird.com/en/.
About Micro Bird:
Established in 2009, Micro Bird Inc. is a joint venture between Girardin Minibus and Blue Bird Corporation, combining nearly 160 years of experience in the bus industry. Headquartered in Drummondville, Quebec, Micro Bird designs and manufactures the complete line of Type A school, commercial, and electric buses known for their durability, safety, and long-term value. In 2025, Micro Bird expanded its footprint with a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Plattsburgh, New York — a strategic investment that brings the company closer to its U.S. customers and strengthens its ability to deliver innovative, Buy America Act–compliant transportation solutions across North America. For more information, visit www.microbird.com.
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Today, Zūm, the leader in modern student transportation, announced that it will deploy a fully electric school bus fleet for Branford Public Schools beginning in the 2026–27 school year, making Branford the largest fully electric school district with vehicle-to-grid (V2G) capabilities in the Northeast. All electric buses will be supported by modern charging infrastructure, with built-in bidirectional V2G capabilities.
This announcement represents a significant moment for Branford and the evolution of student transportation nationwide. As the largest school district in the Northeast to fully electrify its school bus fleet, Branford is demonstrating that clean, reliable electric student transportation is not a future ambition, but a current possibility for school districts across the country.
The electric fleet is designed with the future capability to strengthen grid resilience by enabling school bus batteries to return energy to the local grid at scale when not in use. This vehicle-to-grid capacity transforms what has traditionally been an underutilized asset into a strategic energy resource — improving reliability, maximizing the value of district infrastructure, and supporting long-term sustainability.
Zum also provides the students and parents of Branford Public Schools with enhanced safety and reliability, reflected in a 98% on-time arrival rate to school. Through its parent app, families can see exactly where their children are during every ride to and from school — creating peace of mind for families each day.
Zum and Branford Public Schools announced the initiative today at Zum’s Branford student transportation yard during an event attended by local and state leaders, including Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz.
Photo caption: Left to right: Sarah Skinner, Zum; Liz Sanchez, Zum; Chairman Peter Berdon;
Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz; Superintendent Tranberg, Branford Public Schools;
Blaize Levitan, COO, Branford Public Schools; Jim Finch, Town of Branford; and
Charlotte Charbono, Zum.
“This marks a major milestone in Zum’s continued national electrification expansion and an exciting moment for student transportation,” said Ritu Narayan, Founder and CEO of Zum. “As we expand our electrification efforts to the East Coast and launch our first fully electric school bus fleet in the region, Branford is helping set a new national standard. With Zum’s technology platform and this state-of-the-art EV fleet, we are reimagining what’s possible — building a modern transportation system rooted in operational excellence and a relentless focus on safety that improves the experience for students, families, and drivers, sets kids up for success in the classroom, strengthens grid reliability and resiliency, and delivers lasting benefits to the entire community.”
“Branford Public Schools, in partnership with Zum, is committed to delivering a first-class transportation system that prioritizes students and families while setting a new standard for safety, reliability, and sustainability,” said Superintendent Christopher Tranberg. “Electric school buses with bidirectional charging capabilities create cleaner transportation today and have the potential to support grid resilience by returning energy from bus batteries back to the grid in the future.”
“Branford is proving that clean, reliable student transportation is possible today,” said Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz. “By deploying the largest fully electric school bus fleet in the Northeast, we are delivering cleaner air for kids, smarter infrastructure for communities, and a model for the nation.”
Photo caption: Lieutenant Governor Susan Bysiewicz delivers remarks at Zum’s Branford school bus yard.
In 2024, Branford Public Schools awarded Zum a 10-year student transportation contract with the goal of transitioning the district to a 100% electric school bus fleet within five years. Through its partnership with Zum, Branford Public Schools is now on track to achieve this transition within the first two years of the contract—three years ahead of schedule.
This achievement builds on Zum’s growing national momentum. Today, Zum partners with school districts across 15 states, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Omaha, Boston and Kansas City, delivering a fully integrated, transparent, and reliable transportation platform at scale. In the 2024–25 school year, Zum made history by deploying the nation’s first fully electric school bus fleet in Oakland Unified School District in California.
To learn more about how Zum is working with thousands of schools to deliver safe, reliable and modern student transportation, please visit Zum’s website.
About Zūm
Zum is a technology-led, data-driven transportation company transforming student transportation—the largest mass transit system in the United States. Today, Zum provides turnkey, modern transportation solutions to more than 4,000 schools across 15 states and is expanding rapidly nationwide. Recognized globally for its innovative approach and operational execution, Zum has raised over $350 million from leading investors including Sequoia Capital, GIC, and SoftBank. Zum has been named to Fast Company’s World’s Most Innovative Companies, CNBC Disruptor 50 and Changemakers, the World Economic Forum, and the Financial Times Fastest Growing Companies. Learn more at www.ridezum.com.
About Branford Public Schools
Located in Branford, Connecticut, Branford Public Schools provides a high-quality, inclusive public education for students from pre-kindergarten through grade 12. The district is committed to academic excellence, student well-being, and equitable learning opportunities that prepare students to think critically, contribute to their communities, and navigate a changing world.
Ford has released a new teaser video for their mid-size electric truck.
Arrives next year with an aerodynamic design and a focus on efficiency.
It will have LFP batteries as well as a new 48-volt low-voltage system.
Ford swung and missed with the F-150 Lightning, but the company continues to pour billions into electric vehicles. We’re starting to see some of the fruits of their labor as they’ve revealed more details about their next-generation of electric vehicles based on the new Universal EV platform.
Set to be launched on a mid-size electric truck in 2027, Ford is promoting the project with a 14 minute video that provides a few glimpses of the vehicle as well as a lot of talk without saying much.
The end result feels like a waste of time, but there are a few interesting nuggets of information including that the model’s “aerodynamic efficiency is more than 15% better than any other pickup truck on the market today and will ultimately result in longer range and lower cost for our customers.”
We can see a rounded front end as well as a curved roof, which enables air to ‘skip’ over the bed. The model also has 20% smaller side mirrors that result in an extra 1.5 miles of range.
The video goes onto say the truck will have large aluminum unicastings that deliver a 27% advantage in casting weight compared to competitors. The model will also have two structural components compared to the Maverick’s 146.
Ford then talks about the truck’s cost-effective lithium iron phosphate battery pack and mentions an upgraded regenerative braking system, which reportedly saves $100 in battery costs.
Digging Deeper
Putting the video aside, Ford noted most automakers have tackled range anxiety by adding large battery packs. This adds range, but it introduces a host of new problems as batteries account for roughly 40% of an EV’s total cost as well as around 25% of their total weight. As a result, bigger batteries mean heavy and expensive vehicles.
To keep prices low, Ford is betting on a small battery and a focus on efficiency. The latter saw them keep a close watch on weight, drag, and rolling resistance.
Ford also introduced a bounties system when developing the truck, which focused on “evaluating tradeoffs.” While there are always competing goals in vehicle development, Ford connected changes to a “specific value tied to the range and battery cost.”
How Much Is 1 mm Worth?
As the automaker explained, their aerodynamic and interior teams could easily see that “adding even 1 mm to the roof height would mean $1.30 in additional battery cost or .055 miles of range. ”This process repeated itself over and over again in other areas, allowing Ford to create an efficient and affordable pickup.
The focus on efficiency didn’t stop there as the Blue Oval noted “power conversion within an electric vehicle platform can account for a surprising amount of wasted energy in a vehicle while charging or even taking energy from the 400V battery and converting it to 48V for the low-voltage devices.” To address this, the truck has a “fully electric vehicle charging ecosystem” that was designed in-house and uses their own software.
This promises to increase efficiency, reduce charging times, and maximize the lifespan of the battery. The company also revealed the model has a bi-directional charging capability and the company’s first 48-volt low-voltage system. Furthermore, the model’s wire harness is 4,000 feet (1,219 meters) shorter and 22 lbs (10 kg) lighter than on their first-generation of electric vehicles.
Rivian R2 launches by June priced from about $45,000.
Sliding rear glass disappears fully into the tailgate area.
It claims wiper placement improves driving range too.
Rivian will begin deliveries of the long-awaited R2 by June this year, finally giving a much larger slice of the public the opportunity to buy one of its EVs. In many ways, it marks a pivotal expansion for the brand into a more accessible segment. Priced to start at around $45,000, it closely resembles the R1S but in a smaller package, and it brings several new features with it.
One of the highlights is the rear window. Seemingly inspired by vehicles such as the Toyota Land Cruiser, Lexus GX, and BMW 3 Series Touring, Rivian has designed a rear window that opens. However, rather than swinging open like some vehicles, the R2’s rear window rolls down into the tailgate, much like a side window.
This sliding setup presented a challenge when Rivian needed to develop a rear wiper. Because the glass disappears completely into the tailgate, mounting the wiper directly to it was not an option. The R2’s teardrop-shaped roof and spoiler also ruled out placing the wiper higher up. As a result, the company developed a compact holder for the wiper within the tailgate itself.
Some Reddit users have questioned how this arrangement will function in the depths of winter, when snow and ice could easily build up around the mechanism. Rivian appears to have anticipated those concerns.
According to InsideEVs, the small compartment housing the wiper includes a hidden drain that channels water out from beneath the tailgate, preventing it from pooling. For those in the Northeast already thinking about freezing temperatures, the holder-and-drain assembly also integrates a heating element designed to melt accumulated snow or ice and guide the water away.
Rivian says that by placing the rear wiper in this position, it has been able to boost the R2’s range by a considerable six miles. It no doubt caused headaches for some designers and engineers, but it could prove worthwhile. Here’s hoping it’s adequately tested in winter conditions before customer deliveries begin.
PROS ›› Lots of utility, genuinely quick, quiet cabin CONS ›› Tight rear space, Trailseeker is cheaper, divisive styling
Toyota is one of the few brands that still seems intent on giving enthusiasts something to get excited about. Vehicles like the Land Cruiser, GR Corolla, and GR Supra make that clear. But what about the eco-conscious buyer with a family? Until now, that same energy hasn’t really carried over to its EV lineup. The bZ Woodland is meant to change that.
It would be easy to look at it and assume this is just another trim level dressed up with black plastic cladding and a roof rack meant to suggest capability more than deliver it. After all, Toyota is still a long way from securing a serious foothold in the all-electric space. This SUV, which actually looks more like a wagon on stilts, not dissimilar to older Subaru Outbacks, pushes the brand more squarely into the conversation.
190.2 L x 73.2 W x 63.8 in H (4,830 x 1,860 x 1,620 mm)
› Wheelbase:
112.2 in (2,850 mm)
› Curb Weight:
4,376–4,453 pounds (1,985–2,020 kg)
› Powertrain:
Dual electric motors / 74.7 kWh battery
› Output:
375 hp (280 kW)
› 0-60 mph:
4.4 seconds (97 kmh)
› Transmission:
Single speed
› Efficiency:
21.0 kWh/100 km as tested
› On Sale:
First-half of 2026
SWIPE
On paper, this could be the vehicle to move Toyota’s EV aspirations higher. It’s a family hauler. It sounds like it’ll be reasonably capable off-road. Clearly, on-road performance is something the automaker considered as well. Does it all actually pay off in the real world, though? That’s what we went all the way to California to find out.
Rugged Cues With Familiar DNA
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
From afar, the bZ Woodland looks like it’s gone out into the world in a monotone plaid shirt. It’s trying to stand out and appear rugged, but not shouting for others to look at it. Some will love it and appreciate the understatedness, and others will think it’s trying too hard and is a bit overdone. Personally, I’m not sure the black plastic cladding is doing much good, but once it has some dirt on it, the overall package does appear appropriate.
That said, it’s far from a departure from Toyota’s previous design efforts. The hammerhead nose, first introduced on the widely-loved new Prius design, is here and is complemented by a full-width LED lightbar and DRLs. The sideskirts and rear of the car offer more cladding and even a faux diffuser treatment below another full-width LED lightbar.
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
If you’re getting Subaru vibes from the shape, don’t feel bad. This SUV rolls off a Subaru production line with that brand’s Trailseeker SUV. The two share just about everything under the skin, but compare them side to side, and to my eye, it’s the Toyota that seems to have a more cohesive design overall.
Cabin Design And Layout
In the cabin, this crossover walks a fine line between rugged and refined. The materials feel good overall. They’re not luxurious or even what I’d call premium necessarily, but there’s a lot of thoughtful little touches to enjoy. Take, for example, the visual texturizing of the dashboard edges and upper door cards.
It elevates what could otherwise be a very plain space. That said, it’s all monotone. Black and more black, unless you opt for Stone Brown. I wish there were a little more visual drama inside, but from a business standpoint, Toyota probably made the smart call.
The cabin layout is straightforward to the point of being almost clinical. The 14-inch infotainment screen dominates the dash. It’s fast, intuitive, and thankfully backed up by integrated physical controls for key functions. The steering wheel feels tech-forward, with buttons for lane centering, voice commands, regenerative braking adjustments, and more. It’s busy, but logical.
Ergonomics And Everyday Usability
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
One potential issue, especially for shorter drivers, is that the steering wheel doesn’t have much in the way of maneuverability. My drive partner, Jason Torchinsky from our friends over at The Autopian, specifically remarked on how shorter drivers will struggle to see the entire gauge cluster without having the wheel block a significant portion of it.
In other words, shorter drivers might have to pick between seeing the whole road or seeing the whole gauge cluster because doing both at once might be impossible.
Another strange choice is the shifter knob. You have to press down on a ring and then rotate it in the direction you want. It’s not terrible. But it’s not intuitive, either. And it doesn’t feel like it adds anything meaningful. That space could’ve been used more creatively. Ahead of it, dual wireless chargers are a genuinely nice touch. It’s the kind of small usability win that makes daily life easier.
Rear seat space is where reality sets in. For a relatively large crossover, comparable in footprint to something like a Crown Signia, it’s tight back there. At 6’6″, I’ve endured my share of cramped rear benches, but I wasn’t expecting to have to slouch this much. Average-sized adults will be fine. Taller passengers should absolutely call shotgun.
Cargo space makes up for it. With 74.9 cubic feet available with the seats folded, it’s genuinely cavernous. I fit a full-size, full-suspension mountain bike in the back, thanks to The Mob Shop, without removing the front wheel. That’s impressive.
It speaks not only to total volume but to how large and usable the rear opening is. If it swallows a modern mountain bike that I could ride whole, it’ll handle just about anything else you throw at it. If that’s not enough, it can also tow up to 3,500 pounds (1,588 kg).
Technology And Charging
Toyota loads the Woodland well. The 14-inch touchscreen runs Toyota’s latest multimedia software with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The system is quick and easy to navigate. Dual Bluetooth pairing, Wi-Fi hotspot capability, and available JBL audio round things out nicely.
Charging is handled via a North American Charging Standard (NACS) port, giving access to a broad network of fast chargers. Under ideal conditions, Toyota says it’ll go from 10% to 80% in around 30 minutes. There’s also battery preconditioning and Plug & Charge capability to simplify public charging. That alone is a huge step in the right direction.
Steering-wheel-mounted paddles allow you to adjust regenerative braking intensity on the fly. It’s a useful way to fine-tune the driving experience depending on terrain or traffic. Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 comes standard, along with features like Blind Spot Monitoring, Rear Cross-Traffic Alert, Panoramic View Monitor with Multi-Terrain Monitor, and Safe Exit Alert.
It’s a comprehensive package that just about all buyers will benefit from.
Drive Impressions
Here’s where things take another unexpected turn, and this time, it’s decidedly for the better. Testing crossovers often means evaluating a vehicle that starts out compromised by design. What you don’t expect is something that does so many things at an above-average level, but that’s exactly where the bZ Woodland lands from a driver’s perspective.
Within 60 seconds of the opening presentation surrounding this vehicle, Toyota was proudly boasting that it has a 0-60 time of just 4.4 seconds. That’s unusual both in how it’s positioned and in terms of outright quickness.
For context, that’s quick enough to leave a GR Corolla (4.8 seconds) for dead and to almost keep up with a GR Supra manual (4.2 seconds). It actually beats the older four-cylinder version of the Supra (5.0 seconds). That said, this car isn’t really about outright speed. It’s about well-rounded capability.
Photos Stephen Rivers/Carscoops
What matters is how broad its competence is. On steep dirt roads, even with minimal momentum, the Woodland climbed confidently. On an off-road course with deep ruts that frequently lifted a wheel into the air, it slowly and methodically found traction and worked its way forward.
Grip Control functions like a low-speed cruise control for rough terrain, maintaining a steady crawl (roughly 3–5 mph or 5–8 km/h)) without constant throttle or brake input. In my testing, it wasn’t strictly necessary, but I can see it being useful on tight trails where steering precision matters more than pedal modulation.
On pavement, it’s exactly what most buyers want. Quiet. Smooth. Stable. Even on the optional all-terrain tires, road noise is impressively subdued.
Is it engaging? Not really. It’s more forgettable than fun. But it’s also sharp enough and consistent enough that you won’t complain. Visibility is good. Controls are balanced. Feedback is predictable. It’s faster than most people need, more capable off-road than most buyers will ever test, and more comfortable in daily driving than you’d expect from something with this much performance on tap. That’s a pretty compelling blend.
Range And Real World Efficiency
Toyota says the bZ Woodland will get up to 281 miles of range or 260 with its $0 optional all-terrain rubber. We drove different versions to different degrees of accelerator pedal excess, but managed one key finding in the end. During one restrained trip on a car equipped with all-terrain tires, we managed 3.5 miles per kWh.
Considering the 74.7 kWh battery pack under the floor, that works out to a potential 261 miles (420 km) on a single charge, assuming conditions stayed consistent. It’s difficult to view that as anything but a win, especially given that this wasn’t a tightly controlled test facility but real-world driving in Ojai, California, where the roads are rarely flat or straight.
Sure, we’d love even more range, but for now, we’ll take just barely beating an EPA estimate. After all, few folks will use up 260 miles of range in a day anyway.
Market Rivals And Positioning
Unquestionably, the biggest competition for the bZ Woodland will be from the Subaru Trailseeker. Positioned as an electric version of the well-loved Outback, the Trailseeker starts at around $5,000 less ($39,995) than the bZ Woodland ($45,300) and features the same underpinnings, battery, and AWD system. We haven’t sat in one, but based on photos, the cabin looks very similar. We expect the two to drive and handle almost identically as well.
Beyond the Subaru, there aren’t many EVs in this same niche. Rivian’s upcoming $45,000 R2 is likely the closest as it attempts to pair off-road capability with a premium cabin and on-road performance. Even so, it lacks the brand loyalty and recognition Toyota commands, along with the broader availability and ownership advantages, including a vast dealership network and established service infrastructure, that come with choosing a legacy automaker rather than a startup still finding its footing.
Other automakers like Tesla, Ford, Chevrolet, and Honda all have two-row crossovers or SUVs that could go up against the bZ Woodland on the road. None of them really has the same off-road capability angle to their game, though. Some, like Tesla, can’t come close to matching Toyota’s 3,500-lb towing capacity either. We expect that it’ll help Toyota capture a portion of the market that these others simply can’t touch.
Final Thoughts
The bZ Woodland reminds me of something like the Ford F-150. It’s very capable, but very few folks will ever use it to eight tenths of its performance envelope, much less ten tenths. That said, it’s hard to ignore just how much of Toyota’s DNA and ethos managed to find its way into this crossover. The original bZ4x never really felt all that akin to the brand from an identity standpoint.
Toyota’s newest EV offers serious practicality, objective soft-roading capability, and even a bit of serious performance on paved roads. Yes, the rear seat is tight for tall passengers. Yes, the shifter is odd. And yes, the interior could use a little more visual excitement.
But taken as a whole, the bZ Woodland is a genuinely well-rounded electric crossover that does more things well than it does poorly. And for a first serious swing at an adventurous, all-electric Toyota SUV, that’s a strong place to start.
Attorneys for the Palm Beach County School Board argued in court last month that a student with autism who was a victim of sexual assault on a school bus at age 3 and a half did not suffer long-lasting trauma as a result of the attack, a claim strongly disputed by a medical expert testifying for the child’s family, reported The Palm Beach Post.
During testimony Thursday, Miami psychiatrist Dr. Michael Hughes told jurors the sexual assault had a profound and enduring impact on the girl, now 9, affecting her emotional development, learning ability and overall quality of life. Hughes rejected the school board’s assertion that the child’s ongoing difficulties stem solely from pre-existing developmental disabilities.
“The younger the child, the greater the impact of the trauma,” Hughes testified via the article, adding that early childhood experiences play a critical role in long-term development. He explained that the girl’s silence about the January 2007 sexual assault does not indicate a lack of memory or harm.
The girl was riding a school bus carrying special-needs students of varying ages when she was assaulted by a 15-year-old “emotionally disturbed boy.” The school district does not dispute that the assault occurred. Instead, its attorneys argue the district should not be held financially responsible for years of therapy and specialized education. It says the therapy is unrelated to the incident.
According to the news report, Hughes testified that the attack caused the child to withdraw from the world, stunting her curiosity and learning. He noted that adults on the school bus, the driver and a bus aide, failed to protect or comfort her, reinforcing a sense of fear and helplessness.
According to Hughes, the girl’s academic progress has significantly declined. Now in fourth grade, she is reportedly completing preschool-level work. Her I.Q. score dropped from 77 to 67 between first and third grade, placing her in the borderline intellectually disabled range.
“She’s not plateauing — she’s falling further behind,” Hughes said, recommending extensive therapy and specialized education as her only chance at achieving a functional adult life.
School board attorney Thomas McCausland reportedly challenged Hughes’ conclusions, arguing that fluctuations in I.Q. scores are common and can be influenced by factors such as fatigue or nutrition. McCausland also questioned whether the child’s behavior toward Hughes, allowing him to hug her and kiss her forehead, was consistent with someone who views the world as threatening.
Earlier testimony from the girl’s parents described behavioral changes following the sexual assault, including aggression toward toys and family members and rejection of traditionally feminine clothing. McCausland reportedly countered that some of these behaviors predated the incident and suggested that conflicts with her half-brother stem from competitive video gaming.
Jurors appeared engaged, with one asking the father how the girl behaved immediately after the assault. He testified she exited the bus “like an ordinary child.”
The alleged assailant, now 21, was deemed incompetent to stand trial and refused to testify, invoking his Fifth Amendment rights. The bus aide, Grenisha Williams, was fired and later convicted of child neglect. Jurors were shown video footage from the bus, which captured the boy’s movements during the sexual assault, though the girl was not visible due to her size.
Cross-examination of Dr. Hughes is expected to continue as the trial proceeds.
Login
