Horrific video shows the moments before a school bus struck 11-year-old Amira Aminova as she ran across a Brooklyn street after buying chocolate at a bodega.

Police reportedly arrested Wawa Aurelus, 62, the school bus driver who hit Aminova but did not stop at the scene. He was arrested Friday, according to multiple news reports, following the incident that occurred shortly after school let out at 3 p.m. Thursday in the Bath Beach neighborhood.

Aurelus was charged with failure to yield to a pedestrian and failure to exercise due care, both misdemeanors, according to the New York Times.

The video shows Aminova standing on the corner of Bath Ave. at 23rd Ave. and proceeding to cross the street, apparently with seconds remaining on the red-flashing countdown pedestrian signal. As Aminova starts to run across the street, the school bus is seen coming into view heading south on 23rd Ave. and instigating a right-hand turn onto Bath Ave. The bus never stops, and the video cuts out right before it hits the sixth grader.

Aminova was at least the fifth student pedestrian killed this school year nationwide by a school bus, according to School Transportation News research.

State Sen. Steve Chan, a former NYPD officer, represents the 17th district that comprises part of South Brooklyn. He told STN he does not understand how Aurelus did not realize he struck Aminova and continued his route.

“Spending 27 years as a police officer, I’ve seen many accidents involving school buses, tractor trailers and small trucks. Often, a driver will not know when they hit someone in the leg or brushed up against their body. However, in this particular case, I’ve reviewed video tape of the incident from start to finish. This bus driver should have known that he rolled over a person or something,” Chan wrote in an email Saturday. “If he had looked into the rear or side view mirror, he would have seen her on the ground. The intersection was clear and visibility was good. The roadway was dry and flat. The snow built up in the corners was not a factor. There were no other drivers or pedestrians in this intersection. The pedestrian was crossing with the crosswalk and a green light. She did break into a sprint. However, the bus driver had a clear line of sight at the intersection.

“As far as I can tell, this tragedy is the result of complete driver inattention,” he continued. “Of course, I know most school bus drivers are dedicated individuals who help our community every day. But I must ask everyone to use extra caution, especially when making a turn.”

Police later located Aurelus, an employee of Consolidated Bus Service, and took him to the 62nd Precinct for questioning, reported CBS New York. Chan posted on Facebook the driver was detained “a short distance away” from the scene of the collision.

Consolidated Bus Service had not responded to an email seeking comment at this report.

An investigation by the NYPD fatal collision unit continues. A GoFundMe page was set up for Aminova’s mother to help cover funeral and burial costs in Uzbekistan. She immigrated with her daughter to the U.S. several years ago.

---

Related: 4-Year-Old Girl Killed After Being Struck by School Bus in New York
Related: New York School Bus Crash Leaves One Dead, Others Injured
Related: Fatality Data Analysis Indicates School Bus Safety in Comparison to Other Modes

The post School Bus Driver Charged with Hit-and-Run Death of Brooklyn Girl appeared first on School Transportation News.

Training school district employees to recognize early signs of violent behavior is crucial to safe student transportation, especially when school bus drivers are the first school employees to interact with the children each day. And they are often the first to encounter perpetrated acts of violence.

Bret Brooks will discuss this challenging topic at the STN EXPO East conference in Charlotte-Concord, North Carolina on March 27. Brooks will equip attendees with a practical framework, built not just from his experience as a student transportation safety and security consultant but also his background as a U.S. Army major and retired member of the Missouri State Highway Patrol.

This general session will discuss behavioral indicators, environmental cues and communication patterns that could signal potential violent behavior from a student. Using case-analysis, real-world scenarios and behavioral research, Brooks will explain how acts of violence can often be identified on school buses before they happen by recognizing verbal and non-verbal indicators.

Understanding Violent Behavior

The session will highlight the importance of discerning behavior patterns from isolated behaviors, such as changes in speech, mood, posture, speech and eye contact, and identify what are escalating behaviors that require review. Brooks also plans to discuss different types of violence onboard the school bus and how exposure to violence is impacting student behavior.

Attendees will not only learn to recognize the signs and increase their situational awareness but take the appropriate steps to address the risk and respond appropriately. This session is beneficial for school bus transportation professionals and school administrators looking to equip their staff to increase situational awareness, be trained in de-escalation, prevention and make informed decisions that enhance safety in educational environments.

Early Bird savings ends Feb. 13. Register for the conference by the deadline to save $100 on main conference registration. Registration will give access to this and dozens of other educational sessions, hands-on trainings and networking events including the Ride and Drive/Technology Demo, Trade Show and Thomas Built Buses tour, all held over the six-day conference. Register at stnexpo.com/east.

---

Related: STN EXPO East to Feature Timely Discussion on Managing Stress
Related: WATCH: National School Bus Inspection Training Returns to STN EXPO East
Related: WATCH: STN EXPO East Keynote Speaker to Outline Strategies for Creating Impactful Culture

The post Security Expert to Share Indicators Violent Behavior at STN EXPO East appeared first on School Transportation News.

Genesis started out life as a high-end Hyundai, but it was eventually spun off as a luxury brand. The two companies have continued diverging ever since and a big differentiator is coming next year.

It’s a bespoke platform, which promises to deliver performance and refinement worthy of a premium brand. The architecture has reportedly been designed to be flexible and can accommodate both hybrid and electric powertrains.

More: There’s A V8 Under This Genesis Coupe That’s Breaking Every Rule It Can

Speaking to Autocar, Genesis Motor Europe’s Managing Director Peter Kronschnabl said, “It was decided that in order to fulfill the requirements of the brand’s driving dynamics, Genesis needs its own platform for … future models.”

Kronschnabl went on to suggest the architecture will be sporty as it will have “relatively direct steering” as well as a ride that’s firm, but comfortable. He added the new platform should enable Genesis to deliver driving dynamics that echo that of other premium brands.

It remains unclear what models will ride on the new architecture, but Genesis is working on an assortment of new vehicles including a high-performance sports car that was previewed by the Magma GT concept. The luxury brand is aiming to increase annual sales to 350,000 units by 2030 and this will be aided by the introduction of new hybrid, electric, and range-extended vehicles.

However, Kronschnabl suggested Genesis won’t go overboard and try to fill every niche known to man. As he explained, “We are not into that. At the moment, it’s very clear and segmented: we have the GV60, GV70 and the Electrified G80, and even with the new products we will not go to find the last niche, because this leads to confusion of customers.”

What should a school transportation department expect in the wake of a serious or fatal school bus crash? In Tennessee, a painstakingly thorough post-crash investigation process begins by reviewing the bus driver’s training and the bus maintenance records, three of the state’s highway patrol troopers said.

In the immediate aftermath of a school bus crash, school staff should expect authorities to follow specific protocol, beginning with ensuring that everyone who’s injured receives the care they need. Next, they will take steps to preserve the crash scene, properly document physical evidence, take photos, and collect witness statements.

“That includes making sure that nothing’s being taken out before it’s documented and that everything that can be done at the scene is done before anyone starts moving stuff or letting people go,” said Sgt. Jena Eubanks of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. “We may put down paint where a vehicle comes to rest just so we can come out later and measure the scene if need be.”

Lt. Raymond Gaskill said the first steps when investigating a serious or fatal school bus crash include securing the bus driver’s information to determine the commercial driver’s license and training record.

“We’re going to verify that the bus has been inspected and that it was supposed to be operational,” Gaskill said. “Even if the crash is not investigated by the highway patrol, transportation directors know that our team of inspectors have to look at that bus before they put kids back on it.”

If an incident occurred while students were loading or unloading, authorities “want to make sure the eight-way lighting was on and the stop sign was out at the time of the crash so it can be documented,” Gaskill said. “Ninety percent of Tennessee buses have cameras nowadays, so we’ll make sure to get with those transportation directors and look at that video.”

Eubanks said post-crash inspections follow two paths.

“There’s what we do on the people side, and we’ll inspect the bus to see what damage, if there is any damage, occurred as a result of the crash,” she said. “The post-crash inspection is conducted by certified personnel … and it’s a very thorough investigation where we’re breaking down that vehicle mere seconds before the crash and building it back up to see, ‘Was there something wrong with the vehicle at the time that was a causing a factor in the crash?’ Those can take a week or a couple days or weeks more, depending on what we’re dealing with.”

Gaskill said the “people side” probe includes a look back at least 24 hours into the driver’s activities.

“Were they sick? Did they stay up all night? Did they get enough rest? What were they doing? You know, those types of things would all play a factor into the crashes,” he explained.

Authorities will also review on-board technology during a crash event reconstruction with the recognition that systems may not be calibrated or accurate.

“We may use the GPS, but we’d have to look at other factors. My calculations as a reconstructionist tell me their minimum speed was this. The GPS says they were going that fast. That would help your case, but we don’t just take GPS at its word,” Gaskill said.

Distraction the Most Prevalent Cause of Crashes

The most common factors in minor and serious school bus crashes involve hitting mirrors on other vehicles due to being too close to the center line and tail swing when the rear of a bus crosses the center line, according to Gaskill. But, he added, “You would be amazed at how many people rear end a school bus, and you can’t train for that.”

Eubanks said most crashes she sees are caused by “some type of distraction.”

“Whether it’s on the driver of the bus or the driver of the other vehicle because most crashes can be prevented, but I would say most of them are distractions,” Eubanks said.

Capt. Allen England said Gaskill’s and Eubanks’ observations can be covered under one umbrella: Human error.

“Whether it’s distraction or tail swing or something else, that’s human error in the operation of the vehicle. Whether it be loading or unloading children or a child getting caught in a door and dragged, it’s the people factor, human error,” he said. “Rarely do we ever see, maybe two out of 100 times, a mechanical defect that may have contributed to a crash. But that’s human error, too.”

The best crashes, though, are the ones that never happen, thanks to foresight and preparation. The Tennessee Highway Patrol’s focus on preventing crashes begins by inspecting 147 school districts’ roughly 9,800 buses.

“We inspect every school bus in the state at least once per year, some twice or more per year. We train every driver at least one time per year, maybe more. We notify transportation directors of downgrades or anything that alters that driver’s license that they need to know about or they may need to take a driver out of a school bus,” England said. “We have a very robust program, and we have committed individuals to the program to help kids safe.”

The four hours of mandated driver training address common safety issues, Gaskill said. “We look at the crashes that come in across the state throughout the year, and that’s what we train next year,” he added. “If we have a lot of tail swing incidents, we make sure to put in training about tail swing. … Student management is always a big one.”

---

Related: This is Bad
Related: NTSB Investigating Fatal School Bus Dragging in Maine
Related: Waymo Driverless Vehicles Continue to Illegally Pass School Buses

---

As long as transportation departments are performing proper bus maintenance and conducting effective training, England said, his best advice for fleet managers to prevent accidents is “first and foremost, know your driver.

“The driver is typically the largest factor in the crash. So, they need to understand the driver and what’s going on with them. If the driver is going through something horrendous in his personal life, is that going to affect his ability to safely operate that bus?” he continued. “Know your driver and engage with those drivers as frequently as you can.”

Eubanks agreed. In addition to extending England’s advice to the shop foreperson and mechanics, she encouraged fleet managers to conduct video reviews of bus drivers and follow up on complaints about erratic or unsafe driving.

“Also make sure your drivers are doing what they’re supposed to do regarding pre-trips and post-trips. Pre-trip and post-trip (inspections) are required by federal mandate and by our state regulations,” Eubanks said. “Make sure that driver is taking that time in the morning and in the afternoon to walk around their bus make sure everything’s good to go on it, and notating anything that’s wrong and ensuring that that bus is getting fixed properly.”

The post Investigation, Documentation Crucial to School Bus Crash Investigations appeared first on School Transportation News.

Another investigation is underway after a Waymo driverless vehicle hit a young pedestrian, this time in Santa Monica, California.

Last month, School Transportation News reported that Waymo’s driverless vehicles are still illegally passing Austin Independent School District school buses in Texas despite multiple attempts to correct the situation. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a preliminary evaluation Oct. 17, after a Waymo vehicle failed to stop and passed a school bus in Atlanta, Georgia a month earlier.

NHTSA opened another investigation Jan. 28 following the Santa Monica incident, which is about 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles. The preliminary evaluation states that on Jan. 23 Waymo “reported to the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) that a Waymo Automated Vehicle (AV) had struck a child near an elementary school earlier that day.”

The incident occurred within two blocks of the Santa Monica elementary school and during normal school drop off hours. Other children, a crossing guard and several double-parked vehicles were in the vicinity.

The child reportedly ran across the street from behind a double-parked SUV towards the school and was struck by the Waymo AV. Waymo reported that the child sustained minor injuries. The Waymo driverless vehicle was operated by the 5th Generation Automated Driving System.

Waymo announced on its website that it has a commitment to transparency and road safety.

“At Waymo, we are committed to improving road safety, both for our riders and all those with whom we share the road. Part of that commitment is being transparent when incidents occur,” the blog post states.

---

Related: Waymo Driverless Car Illegally Passes Stopped School Bus in Atlanta
Related: NHTSA Investigates Autonomous Waymo Rides After Illegal School Bus Passing
Related: Texas Autonomous Vehicle Task Force Will Work with School Bus Companies

---

Waymo Response to Santa Monica Incident

The company details the incident, noting that it contacted NHTSA and will cooperate with the investigation.

“The event occurred when the pedestrian suddenly entered the roadway from behind a tall SUV, moving directly into our vehicle’s path,” the post notes. “Our technology immediately detected the individual as soon as they began to emerge from behind the stopped vehicle. The Waymo Driver braked hard, reducing speed from approximately 17 mph to under 6 mph before contact was made.”

The Waymo post notes that “a fully attentive human driver in this same situation would have made contact with the pedestrian at approximately 14 mph. This significant reduction in impact speed and severity is a demonstration of the material safety benefit of the Waymo Driver.”

Following contact, the student pedestrian reportedly stood up and walked to the sidewalk, and Waymo called 911. The driveless vehicle moved to the side of the road and stayed there until law enforcement cleared the vehicle.

“This event demonstrates the critical value of our safety systems,” Waymo added. “We remain committed to improving road safety where we operate as we continue on our mission to be the world’s most trusted driver.”

The post Investigation into Waymo Driverless Vehicles Continues Following Latest Collision with Student appeared first on School Transportation News.

The federal EV tax credit is no more, but California is stepping in with a plan to keep momentum alive in the country’s largest EV market. Governor Gavin Newsom has outlined a new set of state-level incentives aimed at first-time EV buyers, designed to pick up where the now-defunct federal tax credit left off.

However, the proposal rules out any repeat discounts for those who already own an electric vehicle, limiting eligibility to newcomers.

Read: Trump Killed The Federal EV Credit, So California Wrote Its Own

The initiative, which still requires approval from state lawmakers, would set aside $200 million. Under the current framework, passenger EVs priced at or under $55,000 would qualify, while vans, SUVs, and pickup trucks with a starting price below $80,000 would also be eligible.

Who Gets What and When?

California has yet to confirm the value of each incentive. What we do know is that the policy would require manufacturers to match the state’s contribution dollar-for-dollar. Like the old federal tax credit, the incentives will be offered immediately at the point of sale and will apply to new EVs purchased or leased. Additionally, Bloomberg reports there will be incentives for used EVs priced below $25,000.

Sarah Swig, a senior climate advisor to Governor Newsom, criticized the rollback of federal support. “The Trump administration’s reckless retreat has created unprecedented uncertainty for automakers and families alike,” she said.

“California is proud to partner with automakers who are committed to the transition to a zero-emission future through shared investment to keep costs down and drive the market forward.”

Expanding the EV Base

According to a spokesperson from the California Air Resources Board, limiting eligibility to first-time EV buyers will help to expand the market, “introducing new consumers to ZEV technology.” CARB added in a statement to InsideEVs that “research shows that once consumers make the switch to ZEVs, they typically don’t go back to dirty gasoline or diesel vehicles.”

In late 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom presented his first proposal for a new EV subsidy scheme in the state, in response to President-elect Trump’s threat to repeal the federal program. Newsom’s proposal would have excluded EVs from Tesla, which quickly drew the ire of Elon Musk. As part of the latest proposal, many Tesla models would be eligible.

The February edition of STN magazine is out, where we continue discussions on the oversight of autonomous vehicles and alternative student transportation. Plus, sign up for school bus inspection training and many more learning opportunities at STN EXPO East in Charlotte, North Carolina, this March.

In the aftermath of a high-profile school bus rollover last August at Leander Independent School District in Central Texas, Director of Transportation Tracie Franco talks lessons learned in emergency response, lap-shoulder seatbelt enforcement, first responder collaboration and staff training.

Read more about crashes.

This episode is brought to you by Transfinder.

Message from EverDriven.

 

Message from School Radio.

 

Stream, subscribe and download the School Transportation Nation podcast on Apple Podcasts, Deezer, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Stitcher and YouTube.

The post (STN Podcast E292) Emergencies & Training: Lessons Learned From Texas School Bus Crash appeared first on School Transportation News.

Hyundai just posted its best January ever in the US, but if you zoom in on the EV corner of the showroom, you’ll probably find salesmen consoling one particular electric model. Because while one Ioniq barely flinched in the face of EV market turmoil, the other faceplanted. Hard, really hard.

Let’s start with the good-ish news. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 slipped just 6 percent year over year in January, which in today’s EV market basically counts as holding steady while everyone else is struggling to keep the fire alive. Hyundai moved 2,126 of them, proving the retro-futuristic crossover still has plenty of fans.

Related: Gas Or EV? Hyundai N Embraces Both With Two New Models For America

Now for the ouch. The Ioniq 6 didn’t just dip, it fell off a statistical cliff, plunging 61 percent to just 344 units. That’s the kind of number that makes accountants quietly close the spreadsheet and go for a walk. Stylish and slippery though it is, the sedan is clearly having a much tougher time finding buyers.

SUVs Equals Sales Success

If Hyundai needs a reminder of what Americans really want, it only has to glance at the SUV side of the ledger. The combustion Palisade surged 29 percent off the back of a refresh, while the Santa Fe climbed 9 percent.

Even the smaller Kona jumped 22 percent. Big, practical, and family-friendly continues to beat low and sleek in the real world.

Hybrids are the real heroes here, though. Hyundai says petrol-electric sales shot up 60 percent, showing buyers still love the idea of electrification, just maybe not one that doesn’t come with a plan B. Models like the Santa Fe Hybrid are clearly hitting the sweet spot between fuel savings and banishing charging anxiety.

Combustion Losers

Not everything else was sunshine, though. The Sonata slid 34 percent, the dies-soon Santa Cruz dropped 32 percent, and Tucson eased back 4 percent. Still, with total Hyundai sales up 2 percent and SUVs making up the bulk of the action, the brand has a solid cushion.

We’ll be following the action closely to see if Hyundai can keep the good news flowing through 2026 – and what action it takes to turn the Ioniq 6’s dismal performance around.

Hyundai USA sales

Volkswagen is investing a significant amount of money to revive the Scout brand and is facing costly overruns. Still, the gamble might be paying off, as early demand for the upcoming Terra pickup and Traveler SUV has been unexpectedly strong.

In a recent interview, a company spokesperson confirmed that more than 150,000 reservations have been placed across the two models. It’s worth noting, though, that these are fully refundable, so as always, there’s a gap between raising a hand and writing a check. Still, for a vehicle that doesn’t yet exist beyond concept form, that’s a solid show of intent.

Read: Scout Concept Rethinks What Actually Belongs On The Back Of An SUV

Of those reservations, Scout CEO Scott Keogh told InsideEVs that roughly 85 percent are for the extended-range models, with only 15 percent opting for the pure EV variants.

A Telling Preference

The decision to launch both the Terra and Traveler as extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs) appears to have struck a nerve. Dubbed the “Harvester,” these versions use a compact four-cylinder generator mounted at the rear, paired with a 63 kWh lithium-ion battery and an electric motor. The result is a combined range of over 500 miles, which clearly resonates with customers wary of battery-only limits.

According to Keogh, Scout has been surprised by just how popular the EREV options are proving. “We felt very good about it,” he said. “Did I think it was 85/15? No. I thought it might be more 60/40, let’s put it that way.” 

He went on to point out that Scout’s call to go EREV from day one has since been echoed by announcements from other major brands, including Ford, Hyundai, Kia, and Jeep, all of whom are preparing range-extender models of their own.

“We felt good about it, and we still do obviously feel good about it,” he added. “We feel better about it now, because, let’s be honest, when you’re all alone, you feel good, but you’re still a little bit alone. Now that others have made similar announcements, it’s like, okay, yeah, people are jumping in.”

All future Scout models will be built at a plant in Blythewood, South Carolina. This site was initially expected to cost $2 billion, but according to a new report, that figure has ballooned to $3 billion. Production of the Terra and Traveler is scheduled to begin in 2027.

It’s no secret that Tesla’s dominance in Europe has been under pressure for a while, but few expected just how steep the drop would be in one of its most loyal markets. While Elon Musk’s polarizing behavior and the rise of competitive alternatives have chipped away at Tesla’s popularity across the continent, one country had stood firm. Until now.

Read: Europe Just Replaced Tesla With A New EV Sales Champion

It turns out that even Norway, long considered Tesla’s European stronghold, may be losing interest. New registration data from January 2026 shows that only 62 units of the Tesla Model Y were delivered in Norway last month, accounting for just 2.8 percent of new car sales.

Across its full range, Tesla sold just 83 vehicles in total, marking an 88 percent decline compared to the same period last year.

Changing of the Guard

Several other electric vehicles now comfortably outpace the Model Y in Norwegian sales. Leading the pack in January was the Volkswagen ID.3, with 299 units registered, nearly five times as many as the Tesla.

Norway January 2026 Sales by Model

The Toyota bZ4X followed with 184, ahead of the Toyota Urban Cruiser at 98 and the Skoda Elroq at 78. Even the relatively obscure Deepal S05 managed to beat the Model Y with 75 new registrations, while the Volkswagen ID.4 came in just above Tesla’s numbers with 69.

EVs Still Reign Supreme

Despite Tesla’s stumble, the Norwegian EV market remains overwhelmingly electric. A staggering 94 percent of all new vehicles sold in Norway last month were EVs. Diesel cars accounted for just 98 sales, while only 7 petrol-powered vehicles were registered across the entire country, the lowest number on record.

While Tesla endured a difficult month in Norway, it did actually experience a bump in sales in certain European markets. For example, sales rose 70 percent in Spain to 456 examples. Additionally, sales jumped 75 percent in Italy to 713 units, rose 26 percent in Sweden to 512, and increased 3 percent in Denmark to 458.

Likely contributing to this growth are the newly available, affordable, and stripped-out versions of the Model 3 and Model Y. These Standard variants were introduced to breathe new life into Tesla’s aging lineup, which has been increasingly criticized for lagging behind newer, more dynamic competitors.

Still, Tesla’s European picture remains mixed. A Reuters report highlights significant losses in key markets: sales in France fell 42 percent, Belgium dropped 31 percent, and the Netherlands saw a dramatic 67 percent decline. In Portugal, the dip was modest but noticeable at just over 3 percent.

New Threats on the Horizon

It will be interesting to see how the rest of 2026 plays out for Tesla in Europe. A growing number of Chinese brands are launching several new models in Europe, and in the second quarter, BYD will start mass production at its plant in Szeged, Hungary, allowing it to sell EVs tariff-free in the region.

Norway January 2026 Sales by Brand

Ron Kinney hopes California’s student injury data in school bus crashes serves as a blueprint for the rest of the U.S. to adopt lap/shoulder seatbelts.

When California became the first state in the nation to implement lap/shoulder seatbelts on school buses in 2004, many in the industry viewed the occupant restraints as unnecessary luxury items. But 20 years of data now tells a much more compelling story, resulting in injury declines and calmer school bus interiors for drivers.

Kinney, who served as state director of school transportation for the California Department of Education from 1983-1997, compiled 30 years of crash data from the California Highway Patrol’s annual “School Bus Crash and Pupil Passenger Injury Summary Report.” Kinney tracked the 10 years prior to and 20 years after the state law went into effect in 2002 that requires all newly purchased school buses after July 1, 2025 be equipped with lap/shoulder seatbelts.

The law led to the development of the current FMVSS 222 requirements for lap/shoulder seatbelts in all Type A school buses nationwide.

Kinney’s data calculates a 74.5 percent decrease in the absolute number of school pupil passenger injuries since 2004. In terms of passenger injuries “per million vehicle miles” traveled, the report tracked a 45.5 percent decrease over the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, the data finds that as the percentage of California school buses equipped with lap/shoulder belts increased incrementally since 2004, “it is reasonable to believe that school pupil passenger injuries will continue to decrease as more school buses equipped with lap/shoulder belts are added to the state fleet.”

Nine of the 10 years prior to the implementation of lap/shoulder seatbelts, student passenger injuries ranged between 425 and 760 per school year, with the height of injuries being 1,112 in the year 2000. There was no information on why the injuries spiked. But 2000 also saw the most school buses on the road (26,291) and the highest number of miles traveled (367,893,624) during that 10-year period before seatbelts.

Meanwhile, in the 20 years after the lap/shoulder seatbelt law went into effect, injuries declined. In 2005, 400 students were injured. During the 2013-2014 school year, 266 injuries were reported. Injuries dropped to 136 the following year. However, the 2015-2016 school year saw a spike to 313 injuries, with the most school buses on the road (28,982) and miles traveled (283,812,564) in the 20-year span. Those resulted in the most school bus crashes (1,886) as well. The 2023-2024 school year, the most recent data collected, saw 131 passenger injuries.

The report states that several factors need consideration when attempting to draw conclusions from the data. These include lap/shoulder belts having a positive impact in reducing pupil passenger injuries per million miles, California’s reduction in regular education home-to-school transportation, and expansion of special education home-to-school transportation.

Additionally, the report cites the increased number of California school buses equipped with lap/shoulder belts and the number of pupil passengers wearing lap/shoulder belts. Kinney writes that the reduction of driver distractions from pupil passengers who are now belted in and less able to misbehave has led to a reduction in driver turnover. The reduction in disciplinary problems and driver distractions also reduces the risk of crashes caused by driver errors.

“This also contributes to reduced driver turnover by creating a safer, less stressful and more rewarding work environment,” the report states. “By physically containing students, these belts address the primary stressors that lead drivers to leave the profession.”

The report also touches on the National Transportation Safety Board investigation into the 2014 Anaheim, California school bus crash, which resulted in a school bus leaving the roadway and striking a concrete light post after the driver fell unconscious. The bus continued up an embarkment and struck an uprooted tree.

NTSB crash simulations found that students sitting in row eight, where the tree intruded into the school bus cabin, would have experienced greater injuries had they not been wearing lap/shoulder seatbelts.

---

Related: NTSB Calls for Seatbelt Polices, Procedures Following Texas School Bus Crash
Related: Illinois Bill Advances to Require Lap/Shoulder Seatbelts on New School Buses
Related: Evolution of Thought

---

Kinney’s report also addresses the increased cost of a school bus with lap/shoulder seatbelts.

“Based on the large reduction in pupil passenger injuries revealed in this report since the implementation of lap/shoulder belts in all new California school buses, the cost-benefits of lap/shoulder belts clearly tip the scales in favor of installing lap/shoulder belts on all new school buses across the nation,” it states, adding that in the 20 years since lap/shoulder seatbelts were required California saw no student fatalities. “…the reduction in pupil passenger injuries more than justifies the few thousands of dollars initial cost.

“When spread over the average 20-year life cycle of a California school bus, the cost is around $500.00 per year. And, if you consider the number of trips per school year and the number of pupils transported each day, the cost is pennies per child per day. The litigation costs, not to mention the costs of settling a court case, can easily be measured in millions of dollars. The financial litigation risks, along with the pain and suffering of a pupil passenger and their family, is something to consider when drawing conclusions on the results and use of this report.”

The post California School Bus Report Shows Lap/Shoulder Seatbelts Reduce Injuries appeared first on School Transportation News.

Scout has offered a closer look at the Traveler Pacific Mist concept, a subtly revised study that originally made its debut at last year’s Los Angeles Auto Show.

Billed as a “re-theme,” the concept features a unique Pacific Mist paint job that was created in-house. The multi-layer, three-stage finish appears to shift colors depending on lighting conditions. As Scout explained, the Traveler looks silver on overcast days but transitions to blue when the sun comes out.

More: Scout Finalizes SUV And Pickup Design With Only A Few Subtle Changes

The color draws inspiration from California’s coast and Scout’s Director of Color, Materials, and Finish Design, Aileen Barraza, said it echoes the “mist that rises when waves crash into the Pacific Coast cliffs.”

Elsewhere, the concept has unique 22-inch wheels with a black finish as well as 35-inch BFGoodrich T/A KO3 all-terrain tires. They’re joined by black door handles and a contrasting black roof.

Designers also gave the concept a roof rack as well as a new rear carrier, which replaces the traditional spare tire. It’s billed as a “backpack” that features two compartments, which can be used for wet or dry storage. It’s an interesting accessory and Scout hinted it could be going into production as they said “All of these upgrades are a sneak peek at the road ahead.”

Moving inside, we can see a stylish interior with brown leather seats and denim-inspired accents. They’re joined by a two-tone steering wheel, metallic accents, and a retractable Cabana Top.

While the concept feels familiar, Scout said it “previews what future packages could look like – distinct palettes, trim sets, gear systems, and accessories built around specific use cases.” In effect, it hints at what a possible special edition could look like in the future.

Scout didn’t mention performance specifications, but we can see it features a Harvester range extended powertrain. This adds an engine into the mix, giving the SUV an overall range in excess of 500 miles (805 km).

A couple of years ago, Audi cooked up a grand plan where gas and diesel cars would wear odd numbers and EVs would get even ones. But the automaker now admits that wasn’t such a genius moment after all, and hints that the classic A4 badge could be heading back from exile to a combustion car soon.

The odd vs even number strategy sounds tidy on a whiteboard, but in real life, it meant the long-running A4 sedan and wagon suddenly became A5 models, a name previously used for coupes and Sportbacks. That shift confused care buyers and frustrated the salespeople who had to deal with them.

Related: Audi Ditches Odd-Even Naming Plan For ICE And EVs After Buyers Bamboozled

Audi CEO Gernot Döllner has now openly called the move, rubber-stamped by his predecessor, a mistake. Speaking to Australia’s Drive at the Munich motor show, he said the brand will return to its traditional system where “A is for flat-floor cars, Q is for SUVs, and then the number describes the size of the car or the segment of the car.”

A4 Facelift and Namelift

Audi U-turned after turning the A4 into an A5, but in time to prevent the A6 from making the same switch. And now Döllner says that rebranding the ICE A5 as an A4 is “thinkable.” That strongly hints the current combustion-powered A5 (seen below) could wear A4 badges when it gets its mid-life update, probably in the next couple of years.

Electric A4 On the Horizon

But while the gas-powered car may revert to A4, Audi is also planning a fully electric A4 e-tron for the 2028 model year, seen below in our artist’s impression. As we’ve reported before, that car is expected to ride on the new Scalable Systems Platform and take design cues from the dramatic Concept C show car.

So in a few years, you could have an A4 with a combustion engine and an A4 that plugs in, a strategy that will be mirrored at BMW and Mercedes with the 3-Series and C-Class. BMW has it slightly easier on the naming front, since it plans to use the i3 badge for the EV, though that comes with its own complications, given the name was already used for an electric hatchback not too long ago.

This isn’t the first time Audi has fessed to making a badging boo-boo. A few years back, it abandoned its traditional engine size-based model names for ones like ’35’ and ’55’ that buyers also found confusing, but it has now backtracked on that decision.

Jaguar’s dramatic electric rebirth is not just about pastel concept cars and moody teaser shots. Prototypes of the upcoming four door GT are out on frozen lakes in Sweden, being hurled sideways in temperatures that would make most EVs want to stay plugged in.

The GT, or whatever Jaguar decides to call it when it debuts later this year, is the production follow up to the Type 00 concept, and Jaguar says it will be the most powerful road car it has ever built.

Related: Jaguar Thinks Its $180K EV Gamble Could Finally Ditch Its BMW Complex

With more than 986 hp (1,000 PS) on tap, it has far more power than you could used on a frozen lake, but the Arctic Circle is the perfect place to test out the limit-behaviour of the all-wheel drive chassis.

Jaguar released some high quality images of the four-door sedan testing, but not much in the way of meaningful technical info to advance the story, beyond mentioning that its clever thermal management system can reduce heating energy consumption by up to 40 percent.

We already knew about the total power output and torque vectoring capability, and the confirmation of twin-valve active dampers and air suspension isn’t much of a surprise.

Tri-motor Setup

But a report by Autocar, which got to hang out with the test team in Sweden, fills in some of the blanks, including breaking down the tri-motor setup. Up front is a roughly 350 hp (355 PS / 261 kW) unit, mainly used for efficiency at cruising speeds. At the rear sit two much angrier motors that together deliver around 950 hp (963 PS / 708 kW).

Combined output is at least 986 hp (1,000 PS / 735 kW), along with a walloping 959 lb ft (1,300 Nm) of torque. And that rumored hybrid conversion JLR is working on? Not true and not happening, the company claims.

Instead of one giant skateboard pack, the 5,200 mm (205 inches) Jag uses multiple battery stacks, including a smaller pack near the front and several larger ones further back.

That setup allows the cabin floor and seats to sit lower, giving the car a sports car like driving position, an impressively low centre of gravity, and keeps the roof height to 1,400 mm (55 inches).

Up to 400 Miles Between Fills

Range is expected to be around 400 miles (644 km) on the US EPA cycle, or about 430 miles (692 km) WLTP, from a battery of roughly 120 kWh. That should make it a genuine long legged GT, the kind of thing Jaguar has historically been good at building, even if this car – at a starting price of £120,000 (about $160,000) – will be twice as expensive as many recent Jaguars.

Production Reveal Coming This Summer

In terms of timing, Jag says we will see the finished production car revealed later this summer. Order books are expected to open in the autumn, with first customer deliveries planned for spring next year.

That’s still a long way off and some dealers are already feeling unsure about the whole EV direction, but the GT and the SUV that comes later, could be worth the wait.

Jaguar

The Transportation Director Summit hosts student transportation leaders from across the country for a two-day event at STN EXPO East, focused on collaborative problem-solving and targeted training.

The Transportation Director Summit begins Friday, March 27 at the Embassy Suites Charlotte-Concord in North Carolina with a “Transportation Director Leadership Discussion” hosted by STN Publisher and President Tony Corpin. The event includes a networking mixer with appetizers and beverages provided. Discussion prompts will be based on the top challenges and changes facing the student transportation industry, as reported by participants via a survey.

On Saturday, the Transportation Director Summit participants head to Topgolf for an exclusive presentation from STN EXPO East keynote speaker Jim Knight. He will explain how to create “Leadership That Rocks” and build strong organizational culture. The day’s schedule will include multiple focused roundtable discussions as attendants are matched with different vendors to discuss the most pressing needs of their operations.

Participants will be provided with food, drinks and open golf bays as they network with other transportation directors and vendors.

Applicants must hold the position of transportation director or a qualified equivalent and be able to attend both days of the Summit. Email kristine@stnmedia.com for more information about qualifying for the Transportation Director Summit.

Register by Feb. 14 to save $100 off full conference registration. Browse conference agenda and explore other unique experiences at stnexpo.com/east.

---

Related: WATCH: STN EXPO East Keynote Speaker to Outline Strategies for Creating Impactful Culture
Related: Industry Veteran to Address Student Transportation Funding Uncertainty at STN EXPO East
Related: STN EXPO East to Feature Timely Discussion on Managing Stress

The post Transportation Director Summit Provides Exclusive Leadership, Networking appeared first on School Transportation News.

Just two weeks after announcing a major trade deal with China that sharply reduced tariffs on EV imports, Canada is exploring another pivotal agreement, this time with South Korea, that could open the door to more car production on Canadian soil.

Although the two countries have had a free trade agreement since 2015, removing tariffs on most goods, this new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) points to a growing interest in deeper cooperation.

Both countries are responding to the unpredictability of U.S. trade policy under the Trump administration by diversifying their economic alliances. Still, for all the optics, neither has the capacity to replace the United States as a primary economic pillar.

More: Trump Hits Korea With New Tariffs, Hyundai And Kia Are About To Pay The Price

The current priority is to strengthen South Korea’s automotive presence in Canada. That could include domestic manufacturing of Korean-branded vehicles as well as increased production of electric vehicle components and battery technologies.

“This agreement will grow our auto sector, create good jobs and reinforce Canada’s position as a global leader in future-ready vehicle manufacturing,” said Industry Minister Mélanie Joly in a statement on Thursday.

Ties Between Auto and Defence

Canada appears to be courting major Korean automakers such as Hyundai, especially in light of South Korea’s bid to replace Canada’s current submarine fleet.

According to CTV News, both Hyundai and defence contractor Hanwha are involved in a proposal to build and maintain 12 submarines for the Royal Canadian Navy. If selected, the deal could be worth up to $100 billion over the next 30 to 40 years.

More: 1,200 Canadians To Lose Their Jobs After GM Moves Trucks Back To The US

Hanwha, a sprawling South Korean industrial group, has already laid groundwork by signing five separate MoUs with Canadian companies to incorporate their technologies and products into its submarine offerings. Among those agreements is a $275 million commitment toward a new structural steel beam mill in Ontario.

South Korea’s Growing Footprint in Canada’s Auto Market

In 2024, South Korean vehicles made up 12 percent of all cars sold in Canada, amounting to 228,257 units. In a statement, the Canadian government emphasized its aim to strengthen the domestic battery supply chain by encouraging investment and collaboration in battery manufacturing, materials processing, and the refinement, processing, and recycling of Canadian critical minerals.

Read: China Is Ready To Start Building Cars In Canada

Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, believes the timing aligns well for Canada to boost its domestic auto sector by leveraging upcoming defence investments.

“Today the business case is there to build a plant here in Canada, perhaps making electric vehicles… and to build where they sell,” he said. “Canada is interested in buying submarines and there are two healthy bidders. And both of those healthy bidders have automakers that sell a lot of cars here and sell batteries here.”

Breaking into the car market with an all-new vehicle is one of the hardest plays in the industry, even more so for a company with no legacy network whatsoever or any prior production history. But Slate Auto is pressing ahead with its plan to launch an affordable, all-electric pickup truck.

While key details about the production version, including pricing, are still being ironed out, the company has shared progress from the plant where it’ll be built.

Read: Slate May Be About To Price Itself Out Of The EV Market

Rather than building the truck overseas, perhaps somewhere where labor costs are lower, Slate Auto is manufacturing it right here in the US. It’s being brought to life at a plant in Warsaw, Indiana, which for decades served as a major printing facility, employing up to 500 people.

A Factory Transformed

As you can imagine, repurposing the site into an electric vehicle facility involves some extensive changes. Among them, 630,000 square feet of anti-slip flooring is being laid to accommodate the factory’s new layout and safety protocols.

Automation is already underway, with robotic laser welders and large-format 3D laser scanners arriving on site. According to Slate, production of its EV pickup is still scheduled to begin before the end of the year.

What Happens Without the Tax Credit?

The truck’s ultimate reception will no doubt hinge on its price. Originally, Slate Auto said it would start below $20,000 when factoring in the now-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. But with that credit now scrapped under the Trump administration, the EV won’t be as cheap as originally promised.

A few months later, the company quietly updated its website to say the “Blank Slate is expected to be priced in the mid-twenties.” Although no further details were provided, the update was widely thought to reflect the anticipated changes to the federal EV tax credit at the time.

When asked about the change, Slate Auto CEO Chris Barman brushed off the concern, saying “it doesn’t matter,” and insisting the truck remains affordable. She didn’t elaborate further.

Price Still in Flux

In a follow-up conversation with InsideEVs, Barman added that the company is still finalizing the pricing structure.

“We’re still working really closely with our suppliers to see what opportunities we have to continue to bring costs down, to see what we can do to pass along to the customer before we announce final pricing,” she said.

Last year, the company had

Also: Slate’s EV Truck Is So Basic Even The Repair Network Is DIY

Slate’s CEO also mentioned that pricing will be a central part of the discussions at a meeting with the company’s suppliers scheduled for next week.

“A big part of that is going to be talking about, are there more opportunities for cost reduction? And the way we’re looking at that is we want to pass it on to the customer,” she said. 

Still, with a production start date fast approaching, the final figure won’t stay a mystery for long.

As many probably expected, Tesla’s Robotaxi service hasn’t grown the way Elon Musk predicted, and it’s not running as smoothly as the company might have hoped. New data shows that the autonomous cars Tesla is operating in Austin, Texas, are crashing far more often than human drivers.

Read: Tesla’s Model Y Robotaxis Can Squirt Now, But Yours Still Can’t

According to figures submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Tesla’s Robotaxis were involved in nine crashes between July and November of last year. During that period, the fleet logged about 500,000 miles, which works out to an incident roughly every 55,000 miles.

The Numbers Behind the Crashes

That rate might not seem disastrous at first glance. But NHTSA data shows that human drivers report one police-notified crash about every 500,000 miles. Factoring in unreported incidents, estimates suggest a more realistic figure of one crash every 200,000 miles.

Even by that more forgiving measure, humans are still significantly outperforming Tesla’s current autonomous system. Electrek reported this disparity, pointing out the shortfall in Tesla’s safety metrics.

What makes this more concerning is that each robotaxi has a safety monitor riding in the front passenger seat. Even with a human on board to intervene, the vehicles are still getting into more accidents per mile than human drivers typically do alone.

What Isn’t Tesla Saying?

Tesla doesn’t appear to be exactly transparent about these crashes, either. The reports submitted to the NHTSA are heavily redacted, leaving only limited details available.

In one case from September 2025, a robotaxi reportedly “hit an animal at 27 mph,” but there’s no information on how or why it happened. That same month, another vehicle was involved in a collision with a cyclist, though again, the specifics are missing.

Overall, Tesla reported nine crashes involving its Robotaxi fleet in Austin, between July and November 2025, according to incident data uncovered by Electrek in NHTSA’s Standing General Order crash reports:

• November 2025: Right turn collision
• October 2025: Incident at 18 mph
• September 2025: Hit an animal at 27 mph
• September 2025: Collision with cyclist
• September 2025: Rear collision while backing (6 mph)
• September 2025: Hit a fixed object in parking lot
• July 2025: Collision with SUV in construction zone
• July 2025: Hit fixed object, causing minor injury (8 mph)
• July 2025: Right turn collision with SUV

Robotaxi’s Slow Expansion

In July of last year, Musk made the rather absurd claim that Tesla’s Robotaxi service would reach “half of the population of the US” by the end of 2025. It’s now 2026, and the service is still limited to just one city: Austin, Texas.

Tesla has expanded its service to the San Francisco Bay Area in California, but because it doesn’t have a permit to operate fully autonomous vehicles in the state, each Model Y is equipped with a human driver. It’s hardly a Robotaxi service then, but rather simply a ride-hailing taxi service.

That said, Tesla isn’t giving up on the idea. During its Q4 earnings call this week, the company confirmed plans to expand the program into seven new cities, including Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Miami, Orlando, Tampa, and Las Vegas, all within the first half of the year.

IM Motors, the upscale joint venture from MG and Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, has pulled the covers off its latest flagship. Named the LS9 Hyper, this SUV builds on the standard LS9 that debuted last year, layering in high-spec upgrades aimed at Chinese buyers who want their tech-laden luxury served in insulated comfort.

Read: ‘IM Presented by MG Motor’ Might Be The Most Ridiculous Car Brand Name Yet

Whereas IM Motors’ smaller offerings like the IM5 and IM6 go all-in on battery-electric power, the LS9 Hyper takes a different route. It’s a range extender rather than a full EV. Under the hood is a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine with 153 horsepower, but its only job is to recharge the 65.9 kWh battery.

Power is delivered through a single 215 hp electric motor at the front axle, backed up by two 261 hp motors at the rear. This setup offers an estimated all-electric range of 191 miles (308 kilometers). The three electric motors also provide torque vectoring, though we don’t think many owners will be hustling this beast through the corners.

The LS9 Hyper also debuts a clever all-electric, all-wheel 24-degree smart steering system, believed to be a first for a vehicle in this class. It achieves a turning radius of just 4.95 meters (16.2 feet), roughly two meters tighter than a Smart ForTwo.

As you can no doubt tell from the photos, this thing is big. In fact, it is 5,279 mm (207.8 inches) long, 2,000 mm (78.7 inches) wide, and stands 1,806 mm (71.1 inches) tall with a massive 3,160 mm (124.4-inch) wheelbase.

The exterior design isn’t particularly noteworthy, but it does look classy. At the front, a light bar and vertically oriented headlights. It also includes a roof-mounted LiDAR and is available with 20-, 21-, and 22-inch wheels. Adding to the fancy looks are silver accents running along the base of the side and rear windows.

Many of the fancy MG’s best features are found in the cabin, which hasn’t been revealed yet, though it’s expected to mirror the LS9 shown here. There’s a single 27.1-inch display, encompassing the cluster and infotainment screen, as well as a separate 15.6-inch monitor for the front passenger.

Audiophiles will have plenty to enjoy with the Bang & Olufsen sound system, while all occupants benefit from massaging seats and an underfloor heating system. Rear-seat passengers aren’t overlooked either, with access to a 27-inch 5K display that folds down from the headliner.

And in case that’s not quite enough, as with the regular LS9, IM will also offers the option of an integrated shower unit built into the tailgate.

Even the most reliable brands can slip up now and then, and this time, it’s Toyota turn in the spotlight. While known for its solid track record in quality control, the automaker has nonetheless found itself navigating a rather awkward parts mishap involving the bZ4X.

Several units will now face a recall in the United States, all due to a mix-up with replacement taillights. So, what exactly went wrong?

Confused Parts Cross Borders

A recall notice issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reveals that taillights originally intended for service replacements in South Korea were accidentally distributed in the U.S. Some of those may have ended up installed on American-market bZ4X models.

Read: One Tiny Bolt Just Sent 55,000 Hybrids Straight Back To Toyota

Due to differences in automotive lighting regulations between the two countries, the South Korean-spec taillights don’t meet American standards. The key issue lies in the side marker, as the Korean units include a side marker reflector, but U.S. regulations require a side marker lamp to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.

Toyota first caught wind of the problem in October, when a parts order came through from Canada requesting a Korea-spec left-hand taillight assembly for the bZ4X. That raised a red flag, prompting the company to dig deeper.

The investigation revealed a potential cause of the mix-up. Both U.S. and Korean versions of the replacement parts had been listed in the catalog, but the Korean version also displayed the term “USA” in its description, likely confusing some who purchased a replacement light.

Toyota believes that a total of 79 right-hand and left-hand replacement taillight assemblies designed for South Korea could have ended up in the United States, although it hasn’t specified how many have been fitted to customer cars.

What Happens Now?

Owners who’ve had a taillight replaced on their bZ4X will be notified via mail. Toyota dealers will inspect the installed parts to determine whether the correct U.S.-spec lights were used. If any Korean-spec units are found, Toyota will replace them at no cost.