The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is issuing a request for information from school bus industry stakeholders as it seeks to add biodiesel, renewable diesel (RD) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as funding options to a revised Clean School Bus Program.

Thursday’s RFI also mentions hydrogen as an eligible fuel listed by the Investing in Infrastructure and Jobs Act, which created the five-year, $5 billion fund. But there are currently no hydrogen school buses in production. The same goes for liquefied natural gas, which differs from propane. The IIJA also mentions CNG, which won a handful of awards, but manufacturers don’t currently produce that fuel option, either.

Diesel-powered school buses do exist in large numbers nationwide, estimated at about 80 percent of the national fleet of approximately 450,000 vehicles. Many operate with biodiesel blended with regular diesel. The RFI specifically states EPA seeks information on B20, or 20 percent biofuel blend with diesel.

Renewable diesel, or RD, is different from biodiesel as the former is produced by a hydrotreating process, making it a hydrocarbon fuel. Because it is otherwise nearly identical to petroleum diesel, RD is a drop-in fuel alternative that diesel engine manufacturers certify for use in their engines without voiding warranties. But RD is more expensive than petroleum diesel except in California, Oregon, New Mexico and Washington, where Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits are at play.

Electric school buses are not a focus of the RFI because EPA said it has sufficient information on its infrastructure, availability and performance.

EPA added electric school buses have accounted for 90 percent of Clean School Bus Program awards to date, and the next funding round should target other allowed alternative fuels “to allow for the maximum number of affordable bus choices to fit school districts’ specific needs.”

What’s in the RFI?

EPA is asking the current availability and anticipated purchasing within the next year to five years of biodiesel, RD, E85 flex fuel, CNG, LNG, propane or any other biofuel and if those school buses are fueled at the school district facility, an offsite private fueling station, or an offsite public station. EPA also wants to know about fuel supplier arrangements.
Specifically for biodiesel and RD, EPA is asking for details on how the blends or drop-in fuels are used.

It requests information on fueling system components, pricing, construction and installation requirements, performance, domestic content, and other practical considerations.

The RFI also states EPA wants information on how it can further safeguard taxpayer dollars. The agency completed an internal review to assess financial management practices and said it uncovered inconsistent documentation, incomplete adherence to reporting an award conditions, improper or premature drawdowns of funds, and insufficient internal controls by certain awardees, including for profit recipients.

EPA said it is “evaluating additional safeguards and conditions for for-profit entities,” which includes audits of financial statements and conflict of interest policies. It is also considering verification tools or documentation to ensure appropriate bus usage and routes before funds are disbursed; milestone-based payment structures, reimbursement-only models, or phased disbursement mechanisms tied to verified delivery to reduce risk and improve accountability; and enforcement mechanisms such as repayment obligations or clawback provisions in cases of nonperformance, noncompliance, or misuse of funds.

The Clean School Bus Program is set to expire at the end of the current fiscal year, which would require the remaining $2 billion that has yet to be awarded needing to rollout over the next six months.

Public comments are due within 45 days of EPA publishing the RFI in the Federal Register. A webinar is scheduled for March 3.

---

Related: EPA ‘Revamping’ Clean School Bus Program
Related: Engine, Truck Manufacturers Support EPA Easing Derate of SCR Diesel Emissions Controls
Related: Deploying Electric School Buses in Rural and Suburban Districts

The post EPA Seeks to Expand Fuel Scope of Clean School Bus Program appeared first on School Transportation News.

Blue Bird Corporation announced its pending acquisition of the remaining 50-percent equity interest in Micro Bird, a joint venture with Canadian bus manufacturer Girardin Minibus. ​The $198.2 million deal, which values Micro Bird at $429.6 million, is expected to close by the end of the second quarter, pending regulatory approval and customary closing conditions. ​

The OEM confirmed Micro Bird President Eric Boule and his current management team continue to oversee day-to-day operations.

The Micro Bird brand originated in the mid-1970s, when Blue Bird introduced its first Type A school bus built on a cutaway van chassis. Blue Bird entered a supply agreement with Girardin Minibus in 1992 to build the Micro Bird in Quebec. The most recent joint venture between Blue Bird and Girardin was signed in 2009, which created Micro Bird, Inc.

The transaction announced Tuesday is funded through a combination of 70-percent stock and 30-percent cash. It includes the $16.5 million purchase of Micro Bird’s new manufacturing facility in Plattsburgh, New York and the transfer of its OEM service parts inventory for $400,000, according to a company presentation on the deal strategy and structure. ​Blue Bird said it plans to issue 2.7 million shares to fund the stock portion and use $154.2 million in cash for the remainder. ​

Blue Bird said the acquisition is expected to enhance the company’s market share in the K-12 student transportation industry by expanding its product portfolio to include a comprehensive lineup of Type A, C and D buses powered by diesel, gas, propane, and electric powertrains. ​The deal will also double Micro Bird’s addressable market in the U.S., thanks to its compliance with Buy America requirements, and strengthen Blue Bird’s presence in Canada. ​

The transaction is projected to be immediately accretive to earnings, with an estimated 8.2 percent increase in earnings per share in fiscal year 2026. ​Blue Bird’s pro forma revenue is expected to grow from $1.5 billion to $1.9 billion, while adjusted EBITDA is forecasted to increase from $225 million to $250 million. The company said it anticipates long-term revenue growth to reach $2.5 billion by 2030, with an EBITDA margin exceeding 15 percent. ​

Micro Bird, known for its high-quality school, commercial and electric buses, is well-positioned for long-term growth. ​Blue Bird said the acquisition will enable it to leverage Micro Bird’s expertise in electric vehicle technology, streamline development and expand into adjacent markets such as commercial and specialty vehicles as well as drive engineering efficiencies, enhance market share, and deliver value to shareholders through profitable growth and stock buybacks. ​

This article is developing.

---

Related: NASDPTS Sunsets School Bus Manufacturers Technical Council, Announces Updates
Related: School Bus Manufacturers Stay the Course Despite Regulatory, Funding Uncertainty
Related: Engine, Truck Manufacturers Support EPA Easing Derate of SCR Diesel Emissions Controls

The post Updated: Blue Bird to Acquire Full Ownership of Micro Bird, Expand Market Share appeared first on School Transportation News.

We discuss the potential impact of the national jobs report on school district budgets, the DOT’s non-domiciled CDL final rule and cutting-edge technology takeaways from the Geotab Connect conference. 

“It’s all about service: I went from servicing my country to now servicing my community.” Bernando Brown, director of student transportation for DeKalb County School District in Georgia, shares how his military experience shaped his work ethic, leadership style and focus on training and mentorship. He also discusses handling retention, budgeting and operational challenges.

Read more about leadership.

This episode is brought to you by Transfinder.

Message from EverDriven.

 

Message from School Radio.

 

Stream, subscribe and download the School Transportation Nation podcast on Apple Podcasts, Deezer, Google Podcasts, iHeartRadio, Spotify, Stitcher and YouTube.

The post (STN Podcast E294) Boots to Buses: Military Formed Georgia Student Transportation Leader appeared first on School Transportation News.

Before a school bus incident even happens, it’s important for student transportation professionals to be aware of federal safety recommendations and crash investigation procedures. Meg Sweeney from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will be at STN EXPO East to give attendees the latest updates.

Her session “NTSB Investigations & Recommendations: Lap/Shoulder Seat Belts to the School Bus Danger Zone” on March 31 wraps up the conference by outlining various facets of school bus crash investigations. She will discuss occupant protection, which will include NTSB recommendations on lap/shoulder seatbelts and their safety impact during crashes, and shed light on “Danger Zone” crashes, including incidents where vehicles struck stopped school buses or hit a pedestrian.

Sweeney will provide attendees with background on the NTSB and its mission to further safety for students and transportation staff. Attendees will also learn about how NTSB conducts investigations and what school districts can expect when NTSB investigators arrive on scene of a school bus crash.

She will also provide insights into NTSB school bus investigations of high-profile crashes and incidents, including one in Maine that killed a 5-year-old boy, who was dragged 280 feet after the school bus loading doors closed on his arm while he attempted to board. Sweeney also worked on the development of recently released urgent recommendations related to an August crash in Leander, Texas and the use of lap/shoulder seatbelts to prevent student injuries and fatalities.

Sweeney is an accident investigator and project manager in the NTSB’s Office of Highway Safety. She has also worked in the NTSB Safety Studies Division, where she studied child restraint safety, multi-passenger van safety and operator fatigue, as well as at the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

STN EXPO East will be held March 26-31 at the Embassy Suites by Hilton Charlotte Concord Golf Resort & Spa in Concord, North Carolina. Over the five-day conference, attendees will have access to the best in student transportation training, including hands-on training and events, educational sessions, product demonstration labs, green energy panel discussions, an inspirational keynote address, the STN EXPO Trade Show, the Ride and Drive at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and more. Register now at stnexpo.com/east.  

---

Related: STN EXPO East to Feature Illegal Passing Trends, Safety Recommendations
Related: STN EXPO East to Share Importance of School Bus Video Review
Related: Security Expert to Share Indicators Violent Behavior at STN EXPO East

The post NTSB to Provide School Bus Investigation Updates at STN EXPO East appeared first on School Transportation News.

It’s eight months since Xiaomi smashed Porsche’s production EV sedan record at the Nurburgring, but 2026 is the year the Germans fight back. Fresh spy shots from northern Sweden show a vicious-looking, track-ready Taycan ahead of a new record attempt later this year.

Visually, this prototype has matured since we last saw it bullying the Nürburgring in September. The aero components, heavily inspired by the mighty 911 GT3 RS, now look less like prototype science projects and more like showroom-ready hardware.

More: Taycan Goes Full Psycho Mode To Steal Porsche’s Lost Record From Xiaomi

The front splitter is a different shape and no longer held on with motorsport-style bars, and the fat arch spats designed to cover a much wider track now have cooling slots behind the front wheels. Less visible this time, though, due to this car’s disguise, are the saw-tooth vents cut into each fender top whose job is to vent air pressure built up in the wheelhousings.

Toned-Down Rear Wing

SH Proshots

At the back is the same gigantic diffuser we saw on the last prototype, but here it’s paired with a different trunk spoiler. The latest wing looks less race-car-like, its end planes moulded into the overall shape rather than being bolted on. It’s more like the Weissach-kitted Turbo GTs but with an added lip, though it still rides high above the tail to grab as much of the passing air as possible.

We can expect some advanced chassis trickery under the skin and more power than even the 1,019 hp (1,033 PS / 760 kW) the Taycan Turbo GT delivers. The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra’s 1,526 hp (1,547 PS / 1,138 kW) powertrain played a major role in helping the Chinese brand pull off a 7-minute 4.957-second lap of the Ring, beating the Taycan Turbo GT’s record by over 2.5 seconds.

Sub-Seven?

Separately, a stripped-down prototype version of the SU7 recorded 6:22.091, and though we doubt Porsche’s new Taycan will beat that in fully road-legal form, it should become the first production EV to go sub-seven. We’ll find out in a few months when the weather is good enough for Porsche to try for an official timed run.

We’ll also find out if the hottest Taycan will get an RS badge to match those RS aero goodies. If it does, it’ll be the first EV to be granted those letters, and it’ll have a price to match. The Taycan Turbo GT already costs $243,700 with or without the Weissach package, so an RS is surely going to be close to $300k.

SH Proshots

Ford’s sudden decision to cancel its multi-billion-dollar partnership with South Korean battery manufacturer SK On in December, just four months after the first batteries rolled off the line, left 1,600 people without jobs at the joint battery plant in Kentucky.

Read: Ford Got The Loan And Built The EV Battery Plant. Now Everything’s Falling Apart

The move caught workers and locals off guard, and many are placing the blame squarely on Ford. That’s not surprising. Still, the political backdrop, including Trump-era EV policies that limited Ford’s options, played a larger role in how this ultimately unfolded.

The Ripple Effect Of A $7,500 Credit

All brands selling EVs in the US were hurt by the government’s decision to kill the federal tax credit, valued at up to $7,500 for new EVs. While some understandably criticized the program as artificially propping up the industry, there’s no denying that it played a hugely important role in convincing many Americans.

With fewer people buying EVs and other government policies relaxing CAFE fuel-economy standards, Ford acknowledged that “the operating reality has changed,” which is why it’s scrapped a slew of its more ambitious and important EV projects. “We are listening to customers and evaluating the market as it is today, not as everyone predicted it would be five years ago,” Ford recently said.

As reported by The New York Times, Kentucky’s Democratic governor, Andy Beshear, said: “1,600 Kentuckians lost their jobs solely because of Donald Trump pushing that big, ugly bill, eliminating the credits that had people interested and excited to buy EVs. I bet many, if not most, of those 1,600 people voted for him, and he basically fired them.”

Unexpected Closure

The site had only been manufacturing EV batteries for four months before it was shut down. Speaking with the NYT, Joe Morgan says he left a job of 24 years to start working at the plant, confident that EVs would grow in popularity.

Morgan, a registered Republican, acknowledges that “taking away the tax credits did play a little bit of a role in not selling EVs,” but he thinks it’s Ford that should take most of the blame. “I just think Ford made a bad decision when they came out with an F-150 that they wanted to make all electric.”

Derek Doughtery shares a similar view. Landing a job at the battery plant was a turning point for him after previously experiencing homelessness, especially with a second child on the way. He, like others, believes Ford may have misread the market and bears more responsibility than the government.

“At the end of the day, whatever the government policy would be, the company made the decision,” he said.

A Scaled-Back Future

Fortunately, the facility will not close entirely. Now under full Ford control, it will be retooled for battery storage production and is expected to employ roughly 2,100 people. That figure is well below the 5,000 jobs originally projected when the plant was dedicated to building EV batteries, but it offers at least some continuity for a site that only recently promised much more.

The next chapter in BMW’s electric transition is beginning to come into focus as a new i3 edges closer to the market. It brings technology closely aligned with the second-generation iX3, now packaged in sedan form. With pre-series production now underway and official images of a camouflaged prototype already released, new renderings have begun to fill in the remaining blanks.

Read: New i3 And 3-Series Reveal BMW’s Most Striking Split Yet

Much of the i3’s design will be inspired by the Vision Neue Klasse concept unveiled in 2023. However, whereas the subsequent Vision Neue Klasse X ended up looking almost identical to the new iX3, it appears BMW has calmed some of the sedan concept’s most dramatic elements, and the production model should look better.

While the concept featured large illuminated kidney grilles flowing into the LED headlights, recent spy shots and renderings indicate the production model might adopt smaller and slimmer units, better suited to a sedan of this size.

More: The 2027 BMW M5 Facelift Might Skip The Drama, But Not The Debate

These renderings by Nikita Chuyko for Kolesa also show the new electric sedan with a sharper lower front bumper and gloss-black accents. Along the sides, it departs noticeably from the current 3-Series, with split shoulder lines and flush door handles that give the bodywork a cleaner, more contemporary look.

Some uncertainty still surrounds the taillight design. Recent prototypes indicate they will be much smaller than those on the Vision Neue Klasse concept and, in these renderings, they resemble scaled-down versions of the old 2-Series Gran Coupe units.

What About The Interior?

Inside, the change may feel even more dramatic than the exterior. Anyone climbing out of a current 3-Series should brace for a clear break from the more traditional cockpit BMW has refined over the years. If you are coming from the iX3, however, none of this will feel particularly shocking. The i3, along with the next combustion-powered 3-Series, will mirror BMW’s first production Neue Klasse model, down to a dashboard layout.

Also: BMW iX3 Has A 360 Camera, But You’ll Pay Monthly To Use It

Front and center will be BMW’s new ‘Panoramic iDrive’ concept, paired with the brand’s latest software. The conventional instrument cluster is gone, replaced by key information projected across the base of the windscreen, while a large touchscreen sits on the center console.

Shared Underpinnings

Beneath the surface, the i3 rides on the same Neue Klasse EV platform as the new iX3. For anyone concerned that it might fully replace the 3-Series, there is no need. The combustion-powered 3-Series is being updated separately, continuing on a revised version of BMW’s CLAR architecture.

The i3 is expected to launch with BMW’s sixth-generation electric motors and battery technology, along with an 800-volt electrical system shared with the iX3. Early reports suggest one of the first variants will be the i3 50 xDrive, potentially producing around 463 hp, placing it within reach of today’s BMW M3. A less powerful rear-wheel drive model is also planned, along with a flagship electric iM3 featuring four motors.

That high-performance version has been tipped to deliver as much as 1,000 hp, and could even feature a synthesized V10-style soundtrack.

For many modern electric vehicles, progress has come to mean more. More batteries, more screens, more driver aids, and more weight. Longbow doesn’t see that as a requirement, or even desirable, for that matter.

The company was founded in 2023 by Daniel Davey and Mark Tapscott, both veterans of Tesla and Lucid, so they have seen firsthand how ambitious EV concepts hold up once they leave the presentation slide. At the end of 2025, former X Shore CEO Jenny Keisu joined the leadership team, bringing experience from the electric marine world into the mix.

More: This Company Just Built A Speedster Before Elon Finished His Roadster

Speaking exclusively with Carscoops, Tapscott outlined an engineering philosophy rooted in first principles, lightweight design, and a rejection of the idea that electrification must automatically lead to oversized, tech-heavy vehicles.

Does Every EV Need To Be Built From Scratch?

“I think it’s just a strengthening of resolve, to be honest,” Tapscott said when asked whether shifting industry conditions had forced a rethink. Rather than chasing vertical integration or speculative future technologies, Longbow is focused on building a sports car using proven components that already exist.

That mindset was reinforced early on through conversations with one of Tesla’s original co-founders, Tapscott told us, though he did not specify which one. Tesla was founded in 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. “He sort of explained to us… that it’s exactly how they wanted to build Tesla 15–20 years ago,” Tapscott said. Back then, the supply chain simply wasn’t ready. Today, it is.

Instead of pouring resources into building motors or factories from scratch, Longbow is deliberately sourcing components with millions of miles of validation behind them. “There are so many suppliers making incredible products that we can take advantage of,” he explained. “The industry is helping us in what it’s doing.”

Physics First, Always

Tapscott says Longbow didn’t need to “unlearn” much when forming the company, largely because its founders came from motorsport, startups, and consultancy work rather than traditional OEM bureaucracy. What they did adopt, and continuously return to, is physics-based thinking.

“We always come back to that, which is the ‘why’ every single time,” he said. “It’s always ‘why this, ok, why that,’ until we get to that physics first-principle reason. And very often, there isn’t a reason—it’s just a choice.” A clear example is Longbow’s battery architecture. Instead of layering cells inside multiple cases and mounts, the company questioned whether those layers were truly necessary.

“Cells go into a case. That case is in another case. And then it goes into the vehicle, which is another case,” Tapscott explained. “So you end up having these extra layers of unnecessary weight and volume.”

By stripping those layers away and integrating the battery structure directly into the chassis, Longbow says it has achieved significant stiffness gains. According to Tapscott, the resulting structure is “at least twice as stiff as the Lotus chassis,” often cited as a benchmark for lightweight aluminum sports cars.

Clearing The Air On In-Wheel Motors

Longbow’s CES appearance sparked plenty of conversation around in-wheel motors. The brand touted a potential output of 900 horsepower, but it left us wondering how those motors would affect unsprung mass. Tapscott was quick to clarify that what was shown was a demonstration, not a production specification.

“The vehicle that we showed at CES… was really a demonstration,” he said. The goal was to highlight the flexibility of the underlying chassis rather than preview a finalized drivetrain. For production, Longbow is sticking with what Tapscott described as a “beautifully engineered, tiny little watchmaker’s motor” mounted within the vehicle. Still, he sees long-term potential in hub motors, particularly as technology matures.

“There is development work to be done on in-wheel motors,” he said. “We do think there is definitely a future for them… because it gives you so much more opportunity within the vehicle.” So for now, put a pin in the hub motors, but don’t forget them. They could pop back up in a future Longbow product.

Weight Loss As A Daily Discipline

Ask where weight was spent most reluctantly, and Tapscott doesn’t point to a single component. Instead, he describes an internal philosophy that governs every decision. “Our engineers are given two tasks,” he said. “Every day, they need to lose at least one gram from anything they’re designing. And the second is the best design they can do is no design at all.”

That ethos borrows heavily from Colin Chapman, whose influence Tapscott freely acknowledges. Still, Longbow isn’t pursuing minimalism at all costs. Some elements, like a physical shifter, exist purely to enhance the experience. “There are things we’re adding… for the theatrics,” he said. “Customer enjoyment is important.”

Additive Manufacturing And A Different Production Model

One of the most under-the-radar aspects of Longbow’s approach may be how it’s using additive manufacturing beyond prototyping. “At the moment, a lot of the development prototype cars we’ve been producing have been fully 3D printed on the exterior,” Tapscott said, noting how it enables rapid iteration during development.

Looking ahead, he sees additive manufacturing changing how low-volume cars are supported and customized. Instead of maintaining warehouses full of body panels across different markets, parts could be printed locally, on demand.

Read: 8 Years Later, Tesla’s Still Taking $50K Roadster Reservations Musk Promised For 2020

“You can actually just have one printer that can print off that part in that country immediately, without any delay,” he said. The same approach could also enable personalization without the cost typically associated with bespoke programs. “It could be entirely personalized to you,” Tapscott added. “That’s something that hasn’t been explored as much in production automotive.”

An EV That Puts The Driver First

Ultimately, Longbow’s message is that electrification doesn’t have to erase driver engagement. “An EV powertrain doesn’t mean a D-segment SUV with all of the extra cameras and weight and everything else,” Tapscott said. “Those two things are different.”

Longbow wants its car to be a tool – powerful, precise, and rewarding- but only when paired with an engaged driver. Or, as Tapscott put it, borrowing from the company’s own name: the weapon matters, but the archer matters more. Modern EVs are often defined by their tech-heavy approach, but that leads directly to just being outright heavy. Longbow’s approach to cutting out the fat might be its sharpest edge in the market.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Nextbase Dash Cams – North America (@nextbase)

There’s something uniquely American about building an SUV with insane straight-line performance and then expecting it to hustle like a sports car. The Escalade-V and its unrelated Escalade IQ electric sibling may be two of the most gloriously excessive vehicles Cadillac sells today. Both deliver supercar levels of power, which makes the obvious question hard to resist.

More: There’s Only One Way A Mustang Dark Horse Can Beat A BMW M4 Like This

Curious to see which one is actually quicker, Edmunds lined them up for one of its U-drag races. Watching these two dinosaur-sized SUVs subjected to hard launches, heavy braking, and tight turns feels surreal and just plain absurd in the best possible way.

Gas V8 Power Versus Electric Surge

On paper, the Escalade-V and IQ are closely matched, even though their powertrains could not be more different. The V is powered by Cadillac’s 6.2-liter supercharged V8, producing 682 hp and 653 lb-ft (885 Nm) of torque, paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission that drives all four wheels.

By contrast, the Escalade IQ relies on a pair of electric motors and a substantial 212 kWh battery pack. In standard form, it delivers 680 hp and 615 lb-ft (834 Nm) of torque. Switch it into Velocity Max mode, and those figures climb to a healthier 750 hp and 785 lb-ft (1,063 Nm).

The Escalade IQ needs this additional grunt to somewhat offset its insane heft. Whereas the combustion-powered V weighs around 6,300 lbs (2,857 kg), depending on configuration, the IQ weighs in at 9,100 lbs (4,127 kg), making it one of the heaviest passenger vehicles currently on sale.

Read: 2026 Cadillac Escalade IQL Is Long, Really Long

That weight difference shapes the entire contest. In a straight line, instant electric torque can mask mass for a moment, but physics always keeps score. The U-drag format, with its hard launch, heavy braking, tight turn, and sprint to the line, exposes not just power but how well each SUV manages it.

During the first test, the V8-powered version got the jump off the line. After the U-turn, however, the transmission struggled to find the right gear, and the hesitation cost the Escalade-V its lead. That opened the door for the electric IQ to surge past and cross the line several lengths ahead.

Also: When A Super Venom Mustang Shows Up, Hellcats Turn Into Pussycats

Things were closer in the second race. This time, the electric model had the best launch, although the V regained some of that lost time under braking. The duo was neck-and-neck as they raced to the finish, but the IQ just ran out of puff at the top end, allowing the V to narrowly win.

Modern vehicles may be packed with advanced engineering and clever design, but even a minor fender-bender can sometimes trigger catastrophic repair bills. If you own a Rivian R1S or R1T, you might want to keep your fingers crossed that one of the rear quarter panels is never damaged. If it is, repair costs can climb past $50,000, prompting some insurers to write off vehicles that, at least on paper, could be repaired.

An R1S owner recently took to Reddit to share the bill shock he experienced after someone hit his wife’s SUV while it was parked. A photo posted on the forum shows a large dent in the rear quarter panel, along with damage to the wheel and, as it turns out, the frame and suspension too.

Read: Paintless Dent Removal Magician Saved Rivian R1 Owner From $41k Bodyshop Invoice

In the grand scheme of things, the damage does not appear catastrophic. You might reasonably assume the repair would run a few thousand dollars. That assumption would be wrong.

An authorized Rivian repair facility quoted the owner $53,736 to fix this R1S, or more than half the MSRP of a 2026MY that in this configuration, retails for around $100,000. Of that sum, $29,856 is attributed to labor alone. Insurance would cover close to $40,000, leaving the owner responsible for a little over $14,000.

Why Does It Cost So Much?

It appears much of the cost is related to the complexity of replacing the quarter panel, as it can’t simply be removed and replaced with another. Previous cases of similar damage indicate that much of the SUV’s interior must be stripped and that most of the R1S’s side must be removed, cut, and reassembled. In some cases, it’s been reported that the panoramic glass roof may also have to be removed.

Things can be even costlier for owners of R1T models, as the rear-quarter panel is even larger and stretches up and over the side windows, ending at the A-pillars.

According to the owner, “replacing the quarter panel is the majority of that cost. No motor battery or frame damage”. Some commenters questioned the reference to frame damage because the repair quote specifically mentioned it in one line item. The owner, however, clarified that “the side of the vehicle is considered an integral part of the frame”.

He also explained that “suspension work was quoted as 13 total hours of labor vs. about 250 hrs total. So roughly thats 5% of the price”, adding that this was “one of the top Rivian certified shops in our area, who Rivian themselves recommended”.

Also: Can You Believe This Rivian R1T Damage Repair Cost $21,000?

Without a more detailed breakdown, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Still, this is hardly the first time we’ve seen excessively high Rivian repair costs, including a $21,000 estimate for what was described as a relatively minor backup incident.

A Pattern Of High Repair Bills

While this particular example appears to involve underlying damage, which may justify more extensive work, the total still sounds steep. In cases without structural or deeper damage, more affordable solutions do exist.

More: Rivian Owner’s DIY Repair Saves Thousands After Mishap And Teaches Us A Lesson

Many paintless dent removal specialists have repaired similar quarter panel damage for a fraction of the quoted insurance repair cost, restoring the panel rather than replacing it. Just pray that you don’t damage the taillight too.

Winter has a way of exposing weaknesses, and in Norway it does so without mercy. A group of 24 of the newest and best EVs were recently subjected to one of the most demanding range tests imaginable in the depths of Scandinavia’s winter, and it was an American made EV that came out on top.

Read: 90% Of Vehicles Sold In Norway Last Year Were Electric

Conducted by Norwegian publication Motor as part of its biannual El Prix winter range program, the evaluation set out to measure how bitter cold affects real world driving range, and some of the findings are striking.

How The Test Was Conducted

Held twice a year, in winter and in summer, the drive follows a predetermined route. This time, 24 EVs were evaluated in temperatures that dipped as low as -24°F (-31°C), the coldest conditions recorded in the test event’s history and well below previous editions, when temperatures rarely fell under 14°F (-10°C).

For much of the global population, numbers like these might as well belong in weather reports from another planet. Still, they provide a useful stress test. As in previous El Prix runs, each car was driven along the set route until it could no longer maintain the posted speed limit.

The Winners

Coming into the test, the Lucid Air had the highest quoted WLTP range of 960 km (596 miles). In Motor’s winter run, it covered 520 km (323 miles) before the battery was fully depleted. On the other hand, while that figure was higher than any of the other cars evaluated, it is still 46 percent lower than the claimed range.

In terms of outright driving range in the frigid conditions, the Mercedes-Benz CLA also performed well, driving 421 km (261 miles), or 41 percent less than its claimed 709 km (440 miles) WLTP figure. Other strong performers included the Audi A6, which traveled 402 km (250 miles), the BMW iX with 388 km (241 miles), and the Volvo ES90 with 373 km (232 miles).

Two Ways To Look at Numbers

Total driving range, though, is not the most revealing part of the story. What stands out more is how much, or how little, each car’s range shrinks in the cold. By that measure, the MG 6S EV and Hyundai Inster led the field, with their ranges falling just 29 percent from their WLTP claims. They recorded 345 km (214 miles) and 256 km (159 miles), respectively.

A second Chinese MG also performed well, namely the IM6, with its range falling 30 percent from a claimed 505 km (314 miles) to 352 km (219 miles). The KGM Musso was another strong performer, seeing just a 31 percent drop in its range from 379 km (235 miles) to 263 km (163 miles).

At the other end of the scale, the Opel Grandland matched the Lucid Air for the steepest decline, surrendering 46 percent of its claimed range in the cold. The Volvo EX90 was not far behind with a 45 percent drop, while the Tesla Model Y and Suzuki eVitara each gave up 43 percent. The Skoda Elroq and Mercedes CLA also struggled to contain losses, both finishing with a 41 percent reduction.

Cold EV Test

Motor.No

Spy photographers recently snapped the facelifted Range Rover and now they’ve gotten a glimpse of the second-generation Velar. It will be a radical departure as the model becomes even sleeker and adopts a fully electric powertrain.

The redesigned crossover is expected to debut later this year, but it’s still covered in heavy camouflage. This hides a number of key details, but we can expect a rounded front end with a fully enclosed grille that is flanked by slender headlights. They’re joined by a clamshell hood and a wide lower intake.

More: Land Rover’s New Velar Trades V8 Roar For Electric Muscle

The profile immediately stands out as the Velar has a rakish windscreen that flows into a steeply sloping roof. This results in a far more dynamic design, but it looks like this could come at the expense of cargo space and rear seat headroom.

SHProshots

A closer inspection reveals a rear-mounted charging port as well as flush-mounted door handles. They’re joined by streamlined bodywork, which is disguised by subtle bumps.

The rear end is the most interesting angle as we can see a distinctive liftgate with an upright tail. We can also get a glimpse of a roof-mounted camera, which could indicate the Velar will eschew a rear window. That remains to be seen, but Polestar led the way and Jaguar is following suit.

While we’re hopeful that a rear window will be included, the model will have a spoiler and wraparound taillights. They’re accompanied by a minimalist bumper, which features horizontal reflectors.

What Will Power The New Velar?

SHProshots

Land Rover has primarily been focused on promoting the Range Rover Electric, so little is known about the Velar at this point. However, the two models could have a lot in common.

If that’s the case, the Velar could have a 117 kWh battery pack as well as a dual-motor all-wheel drive system that produces around 542 hp (404 kW / 550 PS) and 627 lb-ft (849 Nm) of torque. That being said, we wouldn’t be surprised if there were multiple configurations on the Velar.

While there could be some similarities between the two models, it’s important to note the Velar will ride on the brand’s new electrified modular architecture (EMA). It will be built at the company’s Halewood plant and be a major test to see if Land Rover fans are ready to go electric.

SHProshots

Mercedes held their capital markets day presentation yesterday and announced plans to stage seven world premieres in the next three months. That’s an impressive number, especially considering the company has already introduced the facelifted S-Class and GLC 53.

The automaker didn’t delve into many specifics, but confirmed the new Mercedes-Maybach S-Class debuts in March. The company added the AMG GT 4-Door arrives later this year, while the SUV variant follows in 2027. That year will also see the unveiling of the G-Class Cabriolet.

More: New Mercedes G-Class Cabrio Teased As Testing Begins

While details are light, a slide suggested Mercedes will introduce 16 vehicles this year. Six of them will be fully electric, while the others will have internal combustion engines.

Many of these will be “Top-End” vehicles, which implies we can expect a number of new S-Class variants including the aforementioned Maybach. Some of the others are presumably AMG versions.

As for the Top-End EVs, spy photographers have snapped a facelifted EQS on multiple occasions. It’s expected to feature starry lighting units, a new 800 volt electrical architecture, and an upgraded powertrain. The latter could combine an improved battery with more efficient motors.

2026 will also see the introduction of five Core ICE-powered vehicles and three EVs. One of the latter appears to be the new GLC EQ L for China, which was mentioned in one of the presentations.

On the Entry side of things, there will be a new ICE and EV model. It will join the CLA and GLB, suggesting this could be the redesigned GLA.

2027 will see the introduction of 14 models, three of which will be fully electric. A vast majority of these will become part of the brand’s Core family, while some of the Top-End models could be the facelifted SL.

Mercedes also mentioned a new long-wheelbase GLE for China, which will presumably be based on the facelifted crossover. However, it’s unclear when either model will arrive.

Financials

Fun stuff aside, Mercedes announced adjusted earnings before interest and taxes fell from €13.7 ($16.3) billion in 2024 to €8.2 ($9.7) billion last year. The company blamed the drop on challenges in China, tariffs, and foreign exchange headwinds. On the bright side, the company reduced research and development costs related to future architectures and technologies.

Investors probably won’t like the news, nor will they be thrilled by the proposed dividend of €3.50 ($4.15) per share. That’s significantly less than last year’s payout of €4.30 ($5.10).

H/T to Motor1

January tested the resilience of China’s auto market, exposing fault lines for some brands while spotlighting the rare breakout success. Many domestic manufacturers reported sales declines, with BYD among the most notable names to feel the squeeze. Yet even in a cooling climate, certain models found remarkable momentum. None more so than the Xiaomi YU7.

The all electric SUV, positioned as a rival to the Tesla Model Y and styled with more than a passing resemblance to the Ferrari Purosangue, was the best-selling new vehicle in China last month.

Read: This Ferrari SUV Lookalike From China Makes More Power Than The Real One

According to figures shared by Autohome, it moved 37,869 units, comfortably ahead of the Geely Boyue L in second place with 34,176 sales. The Geely Geome Xingyuan followed with 29,007, while the Aito M7 secured fourth with 26,454 units.

The presence of two Geely models in the top 5 best-sellers reflects a strong month for the group, with sales up 1 percent year-on-year to more than 270,000 units. The M7 from Aito, backed by Huawei and Seres, also surged in popularity, as did other models from the brand, helping it deliver more than 40,000 vehicles, a surge of over 80 percent from January 2025.

Sales of the YU7 in China have remained strong in recent months. December saw 39,089 units sold, making it the third best selling new car in China at the time. That figure represented a clear rise from November’s 33,729 and October’s 33,662.

It has also moved decisively ahead of the Tesla Model Y, selling more than twice as many units. The Model Y ranked only 20th last month, with 16,845 sales, a result that would have seemed unlikely not long ago. In fact, it was China’s best-selling model in December.

Familiar Names Climb The Charts

Perhaps the biggest surprises came from Volkswagen. It ranked fifth in China’s top 20 best-selling cars last month, led by the Sagitar with 25,316 units sold. VW also sold 23,481 Lavidas, 21,330 Tiguan Ls, 20,799 Passats, and 19,306 Magotans. In addition, the Nissan Slyphy sold 24,209 units, indicating that not all hope is lost for legacy carmakers in the country.

Things weren’t so rosy for BYD. It sold 205,518 vehicles in China last month across its brands, a significant decline from the 300,538 in January 2025. Only one of its models entered the top 20, the Fang Cheng Bao Ti7, which ranked 18th with 17,116 units sold.

China New Car Retail Sales January 2026

Sources: Autohome, Carnewschina

After a decade of growth, America’s electric car boom has stopped booming. In 2025, EV registrations slipped 0.4 percent to 1.3 million units, marking the first annual decline in at least 10 years. That’s not exactly a collapse, but it is the first crack in what once looked like an unstoppable surge.

The real drama arrived in December. Registrations plunged 48 percent year over year to just 75,427 vehicles after Congress repealed the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. EVs’ share of the overall market tumbled from 9.9 percent in December 2024 to 5.3 percent in the same month in ’25.

Related: EV Sales Are Booming Everywhere Except One Place

For the full year, EVs accounted for 7.8 percent of light vehicle registrations, down slightly from 8 percent in 2024, according to S&P Global Mobility data reported by Auto News. Meanwhile, total vehicle registrations rose 2.2 percent to 16.25 million units. In other words, Americans kept buying cars, but they increasingly chose ones with old-fashioned combustion engines.

Warning Signs Were There

The slowdown didn’t come out of nowhere. Growth had already cooled from triple-digit surges earlier in the decade to an 11 percent gain in 2024. Through the first half of 2025, EV registrations were still up 4.6 percent before the July announcement that the tax credit would vanish at the end of September. Buyers rushed to beat the deadline in the third quarter, then the market fell silent in the fourth.

Price remains the elephant in the charging bay. Even with incentives, EV sticker prices have hovered above what mainstream buyers feel comfortable paying. Early adopters are largely spoken for, and the next wave of customers worries about charging access and range anxiety. Hybrids have quietly become the safe middle ground.

Tesla Trouble

Tesla, still the heavyweight champion of EV sales, saw its registrations drop 6.8 percent for the year to 570,418 vehicles. Its market share slipped 3.1 percent to 44.9 percent. December was painful but not catastrophic, with a 35 percent decline.

The Model Y held its crown, but the Cybertruck and Model 3 both took heavy hits, and with the Model S and X due to be axed this year and the once-rumored small model not happening, this year is going to be tough, too.

Ford endured an even steeper December slide of 61 percent, while Cadillac enjoyed a rare bright spot thanks to genuinely fresh models, something Tesla badly needs. Rivian and Hyundai also saw declines, underscoring that this was not a one-brand problem, though Rivian does at least have a plan in the form of the smaller R2 SUV that goes on sale this year.

So is that it for EVs? Was it just a brief fad, like fidget spinners? No, analysts expect a slow and steady rebound as automakers trim prices and expand incentives. Charging networks are improving, and some EVs are nearing price parity with comparable gas models. The boom may be over, but the electric story is far from finished.

The Chinese government is stepping up efforts to end the price war among local car manufacturers following a sales decline in the first month of the year. In what is the government’s most drastic step yet, there will be a cap on how low automakers can price their vehicles.

Newly-released guidelines from the State Administration for Market Regulation explicitly ban companies from setting prices below the cost of production as part of their efforts to monopolize the market and squeeze out competition.

Read: China’s EV Boom Is Cooling, And The Big Names Are Feeling It

According to the China Automobile Dealers Association, the price war has caused up to 471 billion yuan ($68 billion) in lost output over the past three years. Market sales dipped by their fastest pace in almost two years in January, declining 19.5 percent year-on-year.

Sales fell by an even more considerable 36 percent from December 2025 to January, plummeting from 2.2 million units to 1.4 million, CTV News reports.

Some analysts predict that domestic demand for new cars in China will fall this year, with sales potentially dropping by up to 3 percent. However, Chinese car companies may offset this by exporting more vehicles to overseas markets. BYD, for example, aims to export 1.3 million battery-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles this year, up from 1.05 million last year.

The Chinese market regulator has warned that companies that don’t comply with the new rules may face “significant legal risks,” although it didn’t reveal what actions could be taken.

Supplier Payment Cycles Slashed

This new ban on setting prices below the cost of production isn’t the only measure being taken to quell the price war. Tighter government oversight has led many major automakers to reduce their supplier payment cycles from an average of 300 days to under 60 days.

As reported by the South China Morning Post, many Chinese car brands have frequently extended payment cycles to keep cash reserves, enabling them to ramp up research and development. The new government oversight appears to be helping.

“The results showed government intervention worked, as the automotive groups feared they could face severe punishment if they failed to operate in compliance with the authorities’ requirements,” chief executive of the Shanghai Mingling Auto Service consultancy Chen Jinzhu said. “Without delayed payments to suppliers, they will not have sufficient cash on hand to sustain discount wars.”

In the space of just a few months, Audi has moved from teasing a China only concept to testing the finished product. Shortly after the first photos of the China only AUDI E7X surfaced, the company released a fresh image of its mid size electric SUV undergoing cold weather testing in China.

While several of Audi’s electric models in Western markets have felt stale and predictable, this one from its all-caps AUDI sub-brand for China looks like a real threat to the country’s homegrown EV powerhouses.

Read: The New AUDI E7X Looks Nothing Like The Audis You Know

The design of the E7X is virtually identical to the E SUV Concept that AUDI presented at last November’s Guangzhou Auto Show. As such, it looks very similar to the E5 Sportback, albeit in the form of a high-riding crossover. Finished in a deep shade of purple and pictured driving on the snow, there’s no denying that it’s a head-turner.

The new image confirms that the front end will include an illuminated AUDI badge, with the intricate LED daytime running lights sweeping across the entire fascia. Created in partnership with Chinese juggernaut SAIC, the E7X is quite imposing, but should look right at home in some of the country’s bright and bustling cities.

Like the E5 Sportback, the E7X includes a prominent LiDAR poking out from the roof, as well as a set of digital wing mirrors. Details released in December by China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology confirmed that the digital mirrors will be optional, with traditional mirrors offered as an alternative.

At the rear, the lighting theme continues. An AUDI badge glows red, framed by LED taillights that wrap around the tailgate. There’s also a prominent split rooftop spoiler to aid in aerodynamics.

Powertrain Options

In terms of power, the electric E7X will have plenty. The entry-level model will use a rear-mounted motor with 402 hp, and an all-wheel drive version will also be available, fitted with dual motors to deliver 671 hp.

Shoppers will be able to choose between a 100 kWh battery and a 109.3 kWh unit, both compatible with an 800-volt electrical architecture. The E7X’s driving range will vary between 615 km (382 miles) and 751 km (466 miles), depending on the motor and battery configuration, as well as different wheel sizes.

The E7X measures 198.8 inches (5,049 mm) in length, 78.6 inches (1,997 mm) in width, and 67.3 inches (1,710 mm) in height, with a wheelbase stretching 120.5 inches (3,060 mm). That makes the production model slightly smaller and shorter than the original concept, though the overall proportions remain close.

More details about the E7X, including the all important pricing, are expected in the coming months.

The Jeep Avenger might still seem fresh to many drivers, but Stellantis isn’t waiting around. Just a few years after its 2023 debut, the small SUV is already heading for a mid-cycle refresh. The updated model is expected to arrive in early 2027, and now, we’re getting our first look.

Caught during cold-weather testing in Europe, a camouflaged prototype hints at what Jeep may be changing on its smallest offering.

Review: Jeep Avenger EV Is A Fun Little Gem That’s Too Small For US

The development vehicle wears a full wrap with Jeep-branded graphics, doing its best to hide the details. But through a few narrow openings, the split LED headlights and cooling intakes seem to be in exactly the same spots as before. One noticeable adjustment, though: the fog lights have shifted slightly lower in the front bumper.

Baldauf

The sculpted profile of the Avenger will most likely be carried over from the current version. Still, the plastic cladding might get a mild revision, and we’re expecting some new alloy wheel designs and exterior colors to freshen things up.

Review: Jeep Avenger Proves ICE And Manual Combo Can Still Be Compelling

At the back, the prototype doesn’t seem to wear any redesigned panels, although this could change as we move closer to the launch date. The single tailpipe suggests that the turbo 1.2-liter three-cylinder gasoline engine lies under the hood, either in non-electrified or mild-hybrid forms.

What To Expect Inside

Our spy photographers managed to get a glimpse inside the cabin, though Stellantis engineers didn’t make it easy. Everything from the dashboard to the door panels and seats was concealed beneath vinyl. The SUV still appears to feature the free-standing infotainment display, positioned separately from the digital instrument cluster. Even so, the effort to hide it all suggests that changes are coming.

It remains to be seen whether Jeep will add softer materials instead of the hard plastics of the current model, at least on the main touchpoints. We also expect that equipment will be updated with the latest connectivity and safety tech from the Stellantis parts bin.

As for the mechanical side, it’s too early for specifics, but there’s no sign of a major overhaul. The current Avenger offers internal combustion, mild-hybrid, and fully electric options, and that lineup will likely continue. An all-wheel-drive variant is already available through the mild-hybrid 4xe trim, and that setup should carry over.

More: Jeep’s Smallest SUV Will Be Built In South America With A Local Twist

The Avenger rides on Stellantis’s updated CMP/eCMP platform, shared with several other models including the Alfa Romeo Junior and Fiat 600. It also underpins the Lancia Ypsilon, Opel Corsa and Mokka, Peugeot 208 and 2008, and DS3. That shared DNA means many of the same components and configurations are likely to remain in play for the refresh.

Baldauf

We’ll keep watching the test fleet as Jeep continues development. With any luck, the next round of spy shots will reveal more by shedding some of the camouflage.

Outside of Europe, the smallest Jeep is getting ready for a wider rollout. Production will soon begin in Brazil, where the Avenger will be offered with region-specific updates. In fact, this camouflaged prototype might not just preview a facelift for Europe, it could also be part of the testing program for a localized South American version with its own powertrain changes.

Like so many other car manufacturers, Volvo’s line-up is becoming increasingly dominated by crossovers and high-riding SUVs, but there’s hope for those who like sedans and estates. According to the Swedish carmaker, the new SPA3 platform for the EX60 offers the flexibility to support low-slung vehicles.

The new underpinnings, which debut in the EX60, have been created in such a way that battery capacity doesn’t determine the height of the vehicle. This is an important distinguishing point between it and the EX90 and ES90’s SPA2 platform, which is an adapted version of the combustion platform.

Read: Volvo Just Gave Its Three-Row EV A Huge Upgrade

In an interview with Autocar, Volvo’s chief technology officer Anders Bell explained that SPA3 enables future EVs to stay closer in width and height to their combustion counterparts. Without having to stretch dimensions just to fit large battery packs, the platform avoids compromising interior space.

Bell added that over 7 kWh of battery capacity can be shifted ahead of the front wheels, opening up more possibilities for weight distribution and design flexibility.

That flexibility comes from a clean-sheet rethink of the platform’s fundamentals. “We can make [cars] high. We can make them low,” said Bell. “It’s all in scalability, and this is unlocked by removing the combustion engine, the exhaust, fuel tanks and everything from the equation, and finding new ways to build up the bone structure and the scalability of the platform.”

Whereas adapted combustion platforms force battery packs to sit entirely between the axles, SPA3 gives designers more room to work with. Cells can now be placed ahead of the scuttle, using more of the floorpan without compromising crash safety or vehicle dynamics.

New Designs Are Now Possible

This means that “in a lower car, you can depopulate cells in the rear footwell, because this is actually what sets the lowest height of a car: the rear-seat passenger.” He noted that many current EVs based on ICE platforms look like baby SUVs because the cars must be raised to accommodate a flat battery pack between the wheels.

By pushing modules ahead of the windscreen, Volvo also creates space for what Bell calls “foot garages.” Similar to those found in the Porsche Taycan and Audi E-tron GT, these recessed floor sections allow for lower seating positions. The result is an EV interior that feels more like a traditional car, with lower rooflines and more natural driving ergonomics.

According to Bell, the new architecture gives Volvo the option to build just about anything it wants. “We can do low. We can do sleek. We can do high. We can do MPVs… It’s all in the cookbook. What we choose to do, however, is a different story.”

A New S60, or V60?

While Volvo wouldn’t reveal what kind of low-slung cars it might have in the works, Bell reiterated it can now go “very low, like proper low,” adding “you can achieve this fantastic bandwidth so we can make super-sleek cars, like there’s no battery pack that affects the height of the roof.”

In theory, this could mean electric versions of sedans like the S60 or S90 could be possible, as well as estates like a new V60 and V90. Such models could look a whole lot more appealing than the ES90, which is Volvo’s current closest car to an electric sedan, but actually sits as high as a crossover because of the ICE-derived underpinnings.

After a string of high-profile crashes in the US and overseas, automakers are facing increased scrutiny over something as basic as door handle design. Once a simple mechanical feature, door handles have become unnecessarily complicated with the rise of electronic systems.

Companies like Tesla and Rivian are facing significant criticism for where they’ve located the emergency interior mechanical door releases if electronic issues prevent the buttons from working. Rivian’s solution for second-row passengers is particularly bad in the R1T and R1S, as they need to remove a large black plastic panel and then reach in to pull a cable to release the door.

Read: Rivian’s New $45,000 EV Is Coming By June

Is the upcoming Rivian R2 any better? Not really. A handful of tech YouTubers recently had the chance to check out pre-production versions of the R2, and JerryRigEverything has provided us with our first look at the R2’s mechanical latches.

Trouble In The Second Row

The latch in the front row is quite simple. Positioned on the underside of the floating storage compartment is a little black plastic handle used to open the doors in emergencies. It’s similar to what’s found in the R1T and R1S, although the emergency releases on those models are larger and easier to identify.

Then there’s the rear. The release is in the same position as the one up front, but bizarrely, passengers have to remove a small plastic cover and then pull a cord, just like they do in the R1 models. The only upside is that the placement has changed slightly for the better.

If you have to give your backseat passengers a tutorial on something as basic as opening the doors in an emergency, the design isn’t clever, it’s flawed. Why Rivian didn’t just carry over the simpler front-door setup is anyone’s guess, but it comes across as needless complexity at best, or cost-cutting by reusing the same flawed design at worst.

Is An Update Happening?

There had been some talk of changes. Rivian was reportedly reworking the R2’s emergency releases in response to incidents involving drivers trapped in burning Teslas. But based on this early look, it doesn’t seem like any major improvement has been made compared to the R1 models.

Although, as this example was a pre-production model, it’s possible that things will be changed for production. Or at least, that’s what we hope.

More: China Officially Bans Pop-Out Door Handles, And The World May Follow

Rivian isn’t alone here. Beyond Tesla, unsurprisingly the poster child for controversial design choices, even Ford has run into trouble with the Mustang Mach-E’s door latches.

And it’s not just the inside of the car that’s raising concerns. Exterior pop-out door handles have created so much controversy that China has decided to ban them on all electric vehicles starting in 2027.