A Lynchburg school bus driver has been arrested for alleged child strangulation during an incident on a bus parked at an elementary school, reported WDBJ 7.

Police responded to an incident at Linkhorne Elementary School March 30, after receiving a report of a disorderly individual. An investigation later determined that a school bus driver allegedly assaulted a student while the bus was parked in the schools lot.

Authorities said via the article that the investigation, conducted in coordination with Lynchburg City Schools, revealed the student had been strangled during the encounter. The child did not suffer life-threatening injuries from the alleged strangulation and is considered safe.

Effie Wynn, 73, of Lynchburg, was arrested April 4, and charged with child strangulation and neglect. She is being held without bond at the Blue Ridge Regional Jail.

Police did not release additional details about what led to the incident or the circumstances surrounding the alleged assault. Officials also did not say whether other students were present on the bus at the time.

The case remains under active investigation, and additional charges could be possible as the investigation continues. Lynchburg City Schools has not publicly commented on the arrest but has reportedly been cooperating with law enforcement.

Authorities are asking anyone with information about the incident to come forward.

---

Related: Child Sexual Assault Charge for Colorado School Bus Driver
Related: Florida School Bus Aide Arrested on Child Abuse Charge
Related: South Carolina School Bus Driver Arrested, Charged with Solicitation of a Minor
Related: Florida School Bus Aide Accused of Child Abuse in Ongoing Beating

The post Child Strangulation Charge for Arrested Virginia School Bus Driver appeared first on School Transportation News.

This year’s STN EXPO West keynote speaker plans to provide attendees the tools they need to cut through the noise and express their relevance in a way that stands out in the crowd.

National Speakers Association’s Speaker Hall of Fame member Bruce Turkel takes the stage in Reno, Nevada this summer at the STN EXPO West conference for student transportation professionals.

Turkel will first address transportation leaders at the Transportation Director Summit, an exclusive training at The Chateau at Incline Village at Lake Tahoe. The directors attending the exclusive training and networking leadership summit will gain insights from Turkel that they can use to instill trust throughout their organizations and how the values of honesty and integrity impact operations.

Clear Communication

Turkel’s July 13 keynote presentation “All About Them: The Power of Relentless Relevance” will bring a message to all conference attendees on how to position oneself in today’s society of instant informational access. In his high-energy presentation, Turkel plans to show attendees that just credentials may not be enough, but that connecting with stakeholders means showing them what you can do for them. Whether its customers or team members, this keynote will give attendees practical strategies to communicate clearly, relevantly and bring positive results.

Turkel’s unique musical talent will also be featured in an interactive exercise in the power of shared experience as attendees learn in minutes to play a song together. This unforgettable presentation will have attendees not only connecting through laughter but have a renewed confidence to update their communication style with necessary clarity and have a customer-centered framework that boosts success for their operations.

Turkel has been in the brand clarity field for over 30 years, running his own global branding firm. His specialty has been how to stand out in a competitive market, having worked with brands like American Express, Nike, Discovery and HBO. He wrote seven books, appeared on national tv news channels and in major publications such as The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

Save $100 on main conference registration with Early Bird Savings when you act by June 5. The STN EXPO West conference will be held July 9-15 at the Peppermill Resort in Reno, Nevada. Updates to agenda and speaker lists can be found at stnexpo.com/west.

---

Related: STN EXPO West Registration Open for 2026, Features Innovative Conference Experience
Related: Sharda Presented with Innovator of the Year Award at STN EXPO West
Related: STN EXPO Keynote Reveals the Impact of Simple, Intentional Moments

The post Turkel to Uncover Secrets of Communicating Relevance at STN EXPO West appeared first on School Transportation News.

To retrofit means to add a component or accessory to something that was not there when originally manufactured. Sounds simple enough, at least according to new or proposed state laws. However, when retrofitting safety technology such as seatbelts or crossing arms, there are many considerations that school district leaders need to consider.

The Lone Star State
Texas Senate Bill 546 requires all school buses transporting students to be equipped with lap/shoulder seatbelts by 2029. It expands upon a 2017 law that only applied to buses manufactured after 2018. SB546, which took effect on Sept. 1, tasks school districts with reporting seatbelt status and retrofit costs to the Texas Education Agency.

SB546 does not provide state funding but allows a temporary exemption if retrofit costs are too high, or retrofitting would void the bus manufacturer’s warranty. Districts are required to publicly report the reason for not ordering lap/shoulder seatbelts and estimated retrofit costs. Teri Mapengo, director of transportation for Prosper Independent School District near Dallas, noted that while all 230 school buses in her fleet have lap/shoulder seatbelts, she cautioned other districts to do their homework. At a previous district, she recalled the challenges of retrofitting seatbelts.

The process is harder than specifying a new purchase order. Instead, legacy buses must be taken out of service while retrofit work is conducted. Plus, she said it takes people power and resources to deliver each bus to the facility, transport that driver back to the facility, then arrange for the bus to be picked up once the installations are completed.

“The hard piece is, that you’re going to have to have some of your buses go out of commission,” she said. “So, if you don’t have spare buses to be able to use for operation, then it’s tough.”

She noted that her previous district also encountered seat structure malfunctions when retrofitting. She recalled taping off seat rows to prohibit students from sitting in them due to safety concerns. Those buses had to be sent back again to be fixed.

She noted the metal attachment that secures the seats at the wall flange would break. Seats are also secured at the aisle floor pedestal. Every bus that was retrofitted would
then need to be inspected by the mechanics to determine any deficiencies.

“The biggest thing that I took away was, when you’re going to retrofit your buses, you [need to be] talking with that company [doing the retrofit] and saying, ‘If this were
to happen, how would we get this fixed? And is there a warranty on that work that you guys are doing?’”

Because all Texas school buses manufactured and sold after 2018 should have seatbelts installed at this point, older buses may not be compatible with newer seats. Around 2014, school bus manufacturers offered seating options that allowed standard seatbacks to be upgraded to those with lap/shoulder belts, which is still an option today. Most older buses do not have options for retrofits or upgrades.

“We were having a big issue with that in my previous district, and so it was just having that communication with the company that we were working with, and they ended up still fixing all of those and then figuring out why that was happening,” she said.

In conversations with other Texas transportation directors, she said many are hoping that the law will add a funding element, especially since Texas districts have received less funding than previously.

Forty miles down the road, Jennifer Gardella sits in a very different situation. The director of transportation for Rockwall Independent School District near Austin currently has almost 50 school buses in need of retrofitting, at an estimated cost of nearly $1.5 million. She noted that the cost estimate depends on the school bus model and how the seats are attached.

She, however, also shared concerns about the scope of statewide installs. “If everyone is doing the retrofit, then how will the vendors keep up with repairs and/or getting the buses back for the start of the school year?” she asked, adding that Rockwall ISD doesn’t have extra activity buses or special program buses to be used as replacements.

Retrofit Decisions Not to Be Taken Lightly
“School bus and seat manufacturers rely on specific manufacturing and assembly processes to ensure their vehicles, seating and lap/shoulder seatbelts meet all applicable state and federal safety regulations,” explained Albert Burleigh, vice president of North America Bus Sales at Blue Bird. “School bus makers typically do not sanction or certify compliance of any aftermarket installations or modifications made to the bus that changes the original seating configuration. Therefore, retrofitters need to conduct their own evaluations to ensure full compliance with all safety regulations. They bear full
responsibility.”

A spokesperson for Thomas Built Buses shared a similar sentiment, noting that “school bus seating systems are engineered as an integrated structure that must meet specific safety standards for strength, crash performance, and so on.”

They added that in many cases adding lap/shoulder seatbelts requires replacement seats specifically designed and tested to accommodate those restraints, as well as proper attachment to the bus structure.

“Thomas Built Buses certifies that each vehicle meets all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards at the time it is manufactured but cannot attest to the compliance of items installed after that,” the spokesperson continued.

For buses originally built with convertible seating designed to accommodate future restraint upgrades, Thomas can provide technical guidance, the spokesperson said, adding that school districts and operators “should work closely with qualified vendors and ensure that any retrofit work is properly certified and compliant with all applicable regulations.”

A spokesperson for IC Bus said the process of adding lap/shoulder seatbelts to existing seats involves various considerations with federal seatbelt standards and requirements. IC Bus encourages its customers and operators to consult with their local IC Bus dealer to discuss retrofitting options.

Addressing Other Safety Needs
Meanwhile, Maine lawmakers introduced legislation that would require school buses in the state to have crossing arms mounted on the front of the vehicle and anti-pinch door sensors that detect objects caught in the loading doors. The bill aims to address two safety issues, which resulted in state fatalities within a little over a month span. A 12-year-old was killed in Rockland by their own school bus during drop off in November, and a 5-year-old in Standish was dragged and killed by a bus door in December. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the dragging incident.

The bill would apply to all buses regardless of model year, meaning older buses without these systems would need to be retrofitted or replaced. Additionally, school bus drivers who do not activate the crossing arm when students load or unload could lose their school-bus endorsement for up to two years.

Different from Texas, Maine state leaders proposed funding to support the upgrades, about $4.3 million. A school bus mechanic in Maine who requested to remain anonymous shared their district hasn’t started the retrofitting process as it waits to see if there will be funding. The mechanic said the district currently has 50 to 55 school buses in its fleet and all but seven have crossing arms. Those are more straightforward retrofits due to the fact they have already been on buses for many years.

Retrofitting anti-pinch systems onto older buses, the mechanic said, will be harder and more expensive. “Not only do you have to fit a new door mechanism but you have to run a new electrical system and reprogram if not swap out modules to be able to properly operate the system,” he said.

They added a preference that retrofitting be performed in-house to save on labor and overall costs to the district. “If the legislation passes, we are prepared to do what is
needed to meet it,” the mechanic noted. “I haven’t heard any specifics yet, but I know Blue Bird is taking this issue very seriously and is working on a solution to the retrofitting issues of the anti-pinch. Without funding from the state, I believe that a large portion of the entire bus fleet in Maine will be out of service and off the road.”

Andrew Wiseman, sales engineer at anti-pinch sensors manufacturer Mayser USA, said his company is working with Maine very closely on the potential retrofit.

Based on conversations, he said there are 2,000 to 3,000 school buses statewide that would require anti-pinch doors. “We have our partnership with Blue Bird, so we will be working on an aftermarket kit with them in the near future,” he said, adding there are also ongoing discussions with IC Bus and Thomas dealers in Maine on retrofit solutions.

“One of our big unknowns is some of the older buses do not have the necessary [electronic] logic to process an anti-pinch sensor’s signal, so we are also providing a control unit that can be mounted above the door and wired into the main control system, but we are still determining how many of these vehicles need control units at this time.”

He said it would be ideal for Mayser to work with the dealers on the best or recommended installation, and then the bus dealer can disperse this knowledge to school district mechanics on how to install the technology.

Wiseman noted that Mayser’s solution for the Maine retrofit costs around several hundreds of dollars per door, if a control unit is required, with the price being reduced further if the control unit can be omitted. For serial production on new vehicles, the price is “even more affordable for school districts” to implement.

The exact time it takes to perform an installation is still in question. “Putting the actual rubber profiles on the doors is easy and takes only a few minutes,” he said. “The difficult part of installation will be the wiring, as a wire will need to be routed from the door blades, into the compartment above the door, wired into a control unit, and then wired into the rest of the vehicle. Our current estimates are that this will take one- to- two hours per vehicle, but this is a rough estimate. Hopefully, we will gain this knowledge soon when we are testing our solutions with the manufacturers.”

Editor’s Note: As reprinted from the April 2026 issue of School Transportation News.

---

Related: Using AI to Reclaim Time & Improve Safety
Related: Is Safety Everyone’s Responsibility?
Related: The Importance of Streamlined Communication in School Bus Transportation for Safety and Efficiency
Related: (STN Podcast E297) Deep Dive into Safety: Illegal Passing & Child Restraints, Plus Green Bus Funding

The post Safety Upgrade Complexities appeared first on School Transportation News.

The Nissan Juke has always stood out from the crowd, sporting a unique shape that’s allowed it to remain a solid option despite competition in its segment always increasing. At its Vision event in Japan, Nissan has unveiled the third-generation Juke, and it’s even more striking than we could have predicted.

The new Juke will be sold exclusively as an EV and will be built at the brand’s British site in Sunderland, alongside the Leaf. It’s based on the CMF-EV or AmpR Medium platform used by the likes of the Renault Scenic E-Tech, Alpine A390, and Nissan Ariya, and is scheduled to launch globally in the spring of next year.

Read: Nissan’s New Rogue Wants To Take The RAV4’s Hybrid Crown

Nissan has yet to release final specifications for the Juke, nor has it released any photos of the crossover’s interior. However, it has unveiled the full exterior design, and it looks unlike any other model Nissan sells. In fact, the design is striking enough that it looks more like a concept car than one that’ll be sold to the public.

Concept Looks

The design is dominated by sharp and jagged lines, starting at the front with a large blacked-out grille and intriguing headlights. It’s also been showcased with angular black wheel arches, while much of the body is finished in a bright shade of green. This color really helps to highlight the profile of the Juke, particularly the wild door skins.

As with the outgoing Juke, the handles for the rear doors remain on the C-pillars. Like the front, the rear is bold with intricate LED taillights and a distinctive tailgate.

Like the current Leaf, the new Nissan Leaf EV will support vehicle-to-grid technology. The battery packs will likely mimic those of the Nissan Leaf, meaning it could be offered with 52 kWh and 75 kWh packs. Interestingly, the existing second-generation Juke isn’t going anywhere.

Despite originally planning to replace the old model with this new one, the second and third-gen versions will instead be sold alongside each other. It’s understood that Nissan will update the design of the old model to mimic the new EV.

Mercedes-Benz isn’t planning a second generation of the EQS, and instead, will sell the future S-Class in both combustion and all-electric guises. Despite this, the brand has just introduced a comprehensive second facelift for the EQS, bringing with it a host of new technologies that may finally convince a small number of shoppers to actually buy the blob.

Four versions have been confirmed at this stage, known as the EQS 400, EQS 450+, EQS 500 4Matic, and EQS 580 4Matic, the latter three of which are all equipped with 800-volt electrical architectures and 122 kWh battery packs that promise improved energy density. The news EQS 400 has a smaller 112 kW pack.

Read: Mercedes Is Betting On A Yoke To Save The Disastrous EQS

Mercedes has also improved the charging abilities of the EV, as it now supports DC charging of up to 350 kW, meaning 199 miles (320 km) of range can be added in 10 minutes. This has been achieved by implementing software that virtually divides the battery pack into two parts, charging each with 400 volts at up to 175 kW.

In addition to the new battery, Mercedes has incorporated new electric motors for all versions. The base EQS 400 delivers 362 hp (270 kW), while the EQS 500 4Matic ups this to 469 hp (350 kW), and the EQS 580 4Matic delivers 577 hp (430 kW) and 590 lb-ft (800 Nm).

Range figures haven’t been announced for all models, but we know the EQS 450+ has a WLTP-rated range of 575 miles (926 km) with claimed energy consumption of between 15.4 kWh/100 km and 19.3 kWh/100 km. All models are also equipped with a two-speed transmission with the first gear focused on providing quick acceleration and the second kicking in at high speeds to boost efficiency.

Perhaps the most significant change made is the implementation of steer-by-wire technology, as pioneered by Lexus and Tesla. The steering ratio has been set at 4:1 at low speeds, allowing drivers to make low-speed maneuvers without needing to repeatedly cross their hands over the steering wheel.

Even More Tech-Focused Than Before

Speaking of the steering wheel, it has morphed into a Tesla-like yoke – which is bound to be controversial. Crucially, Mercedes will continue offering it with a more traditional wheel and electro-mechanical steering, rather than the fancy steer-by-wire system. In addition to the new system, Mercedes has further developed its air suspension system to improve comfort even further.

Visually, the updated EQS is distinguished from the old model thanks to a revised front fascia with a new blacked-out grille complete with dozens of three-pointed stars, and new headlights with star-shaped DRLs.

With the exception of the yoke wheel, the interior is mostly familiar. With that being said, there’s now Mercedes-Benz’s latest Operating System (MB.OS) and the new MBUX Virtual Assistant. The massive Hyperscreen remains, while found in the new 13.1-inch entertainment screens are found in the second row.

US pricing has yet to be announced, but in Europe, we know prices kick off from €94,403 ($111,000) for the EQS 400, €108,635 ($127,700) for the EQS 450+, €123,285 ($145,000) for the EQS 500 4Matic, and €134,732 ($158,500) for the EQS 580 4Matic.

Stellantis is broadening its lineup with a slightly left-field addition, rolling out a last-mile delivery vehicle for Europe through its Leapmotor joint venture, based on the tiny T03. Its compact footprint makes it well suited to the cramped streets of Europe’s city centers, backed by a zero-emission powertrain and pricing pitched to keep fleet buyers interested.

As with most LCV conversions of existing models, the T03 has been reworked into a two-seat van. The rear bench is gone, replaced by a 657 lt (23.2 cubic feet) cargo area. Access comes via the tailgate and rear doors, though the openings are predictably tight.

More: This Leapmotor Packs Lamborghini Huracan Power Into A $38K Family SUV

Payload is less convincing. It is rated at just 220 kg (485 lbs), which limits what it can realistically carry. Then again, this is more about parcels and city drops than shifting bags of cement, so for its intended job, it may be enough.

Inside, it’s better equipped than you’d expect from something pitched at delivery duty. You get an 8-inch digital instrument cluster, a 10.1-inch infotainment touchscreen, and a full suite of ADAS features.

More: Opel And Alfa Romeo’s Next EVs May Be Built Around Chinese Tech, Not German Or Italian

On the outside, the five-door hatchback is unchanged from the standard Leapmotor T03, measuring 3,620 mm (142.5 inches) long. The LCV version sets itself apart with 15-inch steel wheels finished in black, while the color choices are limited to Caribbean Blue, Light White, and Canopy Grey.

Power comes from a single electric motor producing 95 hp (70 kW) and 158 Nm (116.5 lb-ft) of torque, identical to the passenger model. A 37.3 kWh battery delivers up to 256 km (159 miles) of WLTP range, with support for 45 kW DC fast charging.

According to Stellantis, “production finalization” for European markets will take place at the Mirafiori plant in Turin. In reality, that likely means the LCV conversion is handled there, as the Leapmotor T03 itself continues to be built in Jinhua, China, after plans for production at the Tychy plant in Poland were quietly dropped.

More: Stellantis’ Plan For Canada Looks Less Like A Car Factory And More Like A Chinese IKEA, Says Official

Orders for the Leapmotor T03 LCV will open in select EU markets later this month, with the first deliveries expected to land this summer.

Pricing starts at €14,590 ($17,100) excluding VAT, putting it among the most affordable commercial vehicles on sale in Europe. Stellantis is not new to the small EV game either, already offering an LCV version of the even smaller Citroen Ami heavy quadricycle.

For something as expensive and high-tech as the Cadillac Lyriq, buyers probably expect a few software bugs here and there. Maybe a glitchy screen, a frozen app, or a charger that occasionally needs a second try. According to a new lawsuit against General Motors, some owners are dealing with something much worse: SUVs that suddenly become completely unusable.

A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington claims the Cadillac Lyriq suffers from widespread electrical, software, and battery-management issues that can leave the electric SUV unable to start, charge, or drive. In other words, the lawsuit alleges that some Lyriqs effectively become very expensive driveway ornaments, or, in tech terms, bricks. We doubt owners find much comfort in that, regardless of whatever styling drew them in.

More: Thousands Of Cadillac EVs Recalled Over A Feature Meant To Impress

According to the lawsuit seen by Carcomplaints, Washington resident Wendy Cochran and Florida resident Charlene Riddle both say their Lyriqs suffered what’s described as “catastrophic electrical system failure.” Riddle claims GM told her a software fix was required, but that no fix was available at the time. Cochran, meanwhile, says her SUV became unusable, leaving her with lost time, added costs, and a vehicle now worth less than she paid.

Importantly, the filling calls into question failures with the Lyriq’s electrical architecture, battery-management modules, software systems, and vehicle control networks. All of those systems have to constantly work with one another. The plaintiffs point out that if one fails, it can cascade throughout the rest of the system and effectively brick the car.

One important piece of the puzzle is that the lawsuit claims that GM was aware about this issue and put the cars on the market anyway. The lawsuit alleges that the company had access to pre-production testing, engineering reports, warranty claims, dealership repair records, and consumer complaints, all of which pointed to the same issue. Even so, GM allegedly continued marketing the Lyriq as a premium, reliable luxury EV.

At this point, the ball is in GM’s court. It can respond by denying the allegations or, more likely, it could ask the judge to dismiss the case altogether. Generally, the next move comes within three weeks of the initial filing so we should have more news on the case soon.

BYD isn’t content with just taking on the Ford Ranger. China’s most successful automaker is already looking to move up a weight class to challenge the Ford F-150. That next step won’t involve the US market, though, as this larger model is being developed with Australia in mind.

BYD’s first pickup in Australia, the Shark 6, arrived in late 2024 wearing a face that looked more than a little inspired by the F-150. At 5,457 mm (214.8 inches) long, it sits just beyond the typical midsize footprint and comes equipped with a plug-in hybrid powertrain.

More: Jim Farley Said Chinese Pickups Couldn’t Tow Like A Ranger. BYD Just Proved Him Wrong

The Shark 6 was a runaway success, becoming Australia’s best-selling PHEV truck in 2025 with 18,073 deliveries. For 2026, BYD has doubled down, introducing a Performance trim with a more potent powertrain along with a chassis-cab bodystyle driven by customer demand.

Moving Up to the Heavyweights

However, Australians have been asking for something even bigger. Liu Xueliang, managing director of BYD Asia Pacific, said: “Some customers have requested a full-size Shark 6, similar in size to the Ford F-150. We are on our way to try to get there.”

Word of the program first slipped out in early 2025, when David Smitherman, then CEO of EVDirect, said a full-size BYD pickup was “absolutely in development.” Since then, things have gone quiet on timing, but the working expectation points to a 2027 arrival if everything stays on track.

More: BYD Just Landed On Brazil’s Dirty List, And It Wasn’t For Its Cars

According to CarExpert, the real pressure isn’t coming from private buyers chasing something bigger. It’s fleet operators, particularly mining companies, that are pushing for a larger, more capable truck with electrification baked in from the start.

In Australia, the full-size segment currently includes the Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Chevrolet Silverado, and Toyota Tundra. With a combined sales of 8,763 units in 2025, full-size trucks are a niche compared to the midsize segment, as the Ford Ranger alone sold 56,555 units becoming Australia’s best-selling vehicle overall for the third consecutive year. Still, the profit margins are significantly higher, which explains BYD’s interest.

Factory right-hand-drive conversions for full-size trucks don’t come cheap, and in Australia they can easily push past AU$150,000 (US$105,800). The F-150 starts from a little over AU$122,000 (US$87,000) in XLT trim climbing to over AU$152,000 (US$108,000) for the Lariat, both with the 3.5L engine. BYD sees an opening here. Build the truck properly from the start in right-hand drive, price it more sensibly, add a tech-heavy cabin and an electrified powertrain, and suddenly those inflated conversion costs start to look like yesterday’s problem.

More BYD Trucks On The Horizon

That move upmarket isn’t happening in isolation. Liu Xueliang has already suggested a fully electric counterpart to the Shark 6 is in development, aimed squarely at industries that no longer want diesel on site. Mining is the obvious target. If it lands as expected, it will go head-to-head with the electric workhorses now lining up, including the Toyota Hilux BEV, the upcoming Isuzu D-Max BEV, and the LDV eTerron 9.

More: Toyota’s Electric Hilux Costs $20K More Than The Diesel, And That’s Not Even The Worst Part

At the other end of the scale, BYD is also sketching out something smaller. A compact pickup is in the works, expected to ride on a unibody platform and use a plug-in hybrid setup. This one isn’t chasing job sites. It’s aimed at buyers who want the look and versatility of a pickup without committing to something oversized or overly serious.

VW rebounded from the dieselgate scandal determined to do better, but the German brand’s boss has admitted that some of those early efforts landed wide of the mark. Now he’s on a mission to right some ID. wrongs and win back the crowd it drifted away from.

“It was clear to me that we were actually losing our core,” CEO Thomas Schäfer told journalists at the presentation of the heavily facelifted ID.3 Neo. The former Skoda chief, who bagged the top Wolfsburg job in 2022, says the brand had drifted from the VW people knew and loved.

Related: VW ID.4’s Death Could Lead To Birth Of An American Pickup

The problems were everywhere once you started looking. Styling that didn’t quite feel right, confusing touch controls, and a naming strategy that ditched familiar badges in favor of cold tech-speak. Turns out customers didn’t love slider controls for basic functions, and they definitely missed the clarity of names like Golf and Tiguan.

Schäfer didn’t just tweak things around the edges. He gathered hundreds of managers, threw every issue on the table, and asked for brutal honesty. “We had to change ourselves, we had to create a new mindset,” Auto Express reports the CEO saying. He recalled how his wider team reacted with relief rather than resistance when he laid out the new plan.

Ask The Customer

Engineering boss Kai Grünitz says the reset goes deeper than pretty design. “We are doing customer clinics a lot,” he explained, signalling a shift away from gut feeling toward actual feedback. That means features get tested by real people before making production, not just approved in boardrooms because the CEO has decided he likes something and engineers don’t feel able to push back.

Exterior styling is getting a rethink, too, following the Schäfer-assisted exodus of Klaus Bischoff, architect of the mostly bland first-generation ID. cars. New creative boss Andy Mindt, who came from Bentley, has pushed for simpler, more timeless shapes, plus interiors that don’t require a tutorial. Physical buttons are coming back, and even door handles are being reconsidered so they actually work when your hands are full.

“We sell emotions, we sell memories,” Grünitz said, summing up the new direction, which is really just about getting back to the old direction. If VW can pull that off again with the help of cars like the new ID. Polo (below), maybe the people’s car maker really can find its groove.

Tesla is preparing to phase out the two EVs that defined its early success, but not without giving them one last push into the spotlight. Just days after reports emerged that remaining Model S and Model X inventory had been hit with $15,000 price hikes, there is a new sting for anyone who paid up. Both models are being sent off with a final, tightly capped Signature Edition, reserved for a small group of buyers who received email invites.

The Model S sedan and Model X SUV have been around since 2012 and 2015, respectively. After a final update in mid-2025, Tesla confirmed in January 2026 that both would leave production later this year, clearing space at the Fremont plant in California for humanoid robot assembly.

More: Tesla’s Replacing Half Its Lineup With Something That Doesn’t Even Have Wheels

While Tesla has not formally announced the send-off, the news surfaced on X through Ryan McCaffrey, host of the Ride the Lightning podcast. Invitations have already gone out, with a private launch event reportedly set for May.

Tesla will build 250 units of the Model S and just 100 units of the Model X Signature Editions. Both are priced at $159,420. Yes, the last three digits are a wink to Musk’s well-known favorite number, a reference rooted in cannabis culture. And yes, it is a ridiculously steep jump, with premiums of $59,430 for the sedan and $54,430 for the SUV over the standard Plaid versions. For what is essentially a farewell package, that is serious money, even by Tesla standards.

Signature Edition Visual Identity

Both models wear an exclusive Garnet Red finish, inspired by the original Model S launch color. It is paired with gold emblems, giving the cars a celebratory tone. Inside, there is a white Alcantara interior, a yoke steering wheel, and Signature branding throughout.

The Model S sits on 21-inch Velarium wheels with gold brake calipers over carbon ceramic brakes. The Model X gets 22-inch Machina wheels.

More: Tesla’s FSD Was Branded Controversial, But Dutch Safety Regulators Called It The Safest System In The Test

Tesla has also added a numbered plate on the dashboard, special key fobs, and Plaid puddle lights. Finally, the EVs come standard with a Luxe Package including free lifetime access to Tesla Superchargers and the Full Self-Driving (FSD) system.

Underneath, nothing changes mechanically. Both cars retain the tri-motor Plaid setup, delivering 1,020 hp (760 kW / 1,034 PS) and 1,420 Nm (1,047 lb-ft) of torque. Still absurdly quick, still more than enough, if you can stomach that $60K pill.

Screenshots: Tesla via Teslarati

It’s been four years since Renault made the controversial decision to launch an electric SUV with the Megane nameplate. While the Megane E-Tech has failed to trouble the market’s most popular electric SUVs, Renault isn’t willing to throw in the towel just yet and is readying an update for it.

Pictured here for the first time is a facelifted version of the Megane E-Tech, expected to hit the market next year. Since the launch of the current model, Renault has introduced several other new SUVs, including the Symbioz and Scenic E-Tech, and tweaks to the Megane could make it look a little more like those models.

Read: Renault’s Compact EV Will Get A Refresh Following Its Nissan Cousin

This heavily camouflaged prototype retains the same overall shape as the existing model, and we can clearly see some changes have been made to the headlights. While the shape of the main headlamps looks familiar, the LED daytime running lights are clearly different, even though we can only see small parts of them.

Updates have also been made to the rear of the Megane E-Tech with new LED taillights visible and what appears to be a tweaked bumper.

New Batteries?

Baldauf

It’s unclear what changes will be made under the skin of the updated Megane E-Tech. Currently, the SUV is offered with 40 kWh and 60 kWh battery packs, both of which are quite small for a vehicle of this size. By comparison, the admittedly-bigger Scenic E-Tech offers a much larger 87 kWh pack, which is more in line with what we’d expect from an SUV like the Megane.

Like the Scenic, the Megane E-Tech is based on the company’s AmpR Medium architecture, also used by vehicles like the Nissan Ariya and Nissan Leaf, which offer 90 kWh and 75 kWh battery packs, respectively.

Given the shared platform, Renault might have the scope to increase the size of the Megane’s battery pack. Recent reports have suggested it could source new batteries from AESC and produced in France. This should help to boost the EV’s driving range, which currently tops out at 454 km (282 miles).

Baldauf

Maserati is having a rough old time, its sales sinking from 51,500 cars in 2017 to a pitiful 7,900 last year across all of its model lines. Porsche was down too, in 2025, but to 279,449 vehicles, and the Macan alone accounted for over 84,000 of them.

But now Porsche has goofed, giving Maserati a chance to boost its own performance with a refreshed version of its Grecale, the Italian firm’s Macan rival. Fresh spy shots show Maserati is working on updates for both the combustion and the Folgore electric variants of its smallest SUV that are likely to be MY27 cars.

Related: Porsche Sold More Cars In 11 Days Than Maserati Did The Entire Year

So what exactly is this open goal Porsche has gifted Maserati? It’s the end of combustion Macan production. The SUV is already off-sale in mainland Europe due to its failure to comply with European cybersecurity regulations, and though it’s still available in other markets for the time being, production ends this summer.

The Macan Electric EV, which Porsche conceived as taking over from the ICE version altogether, will still be available, but that’s not the one most buyers want. In the first quarter of this year Porsche sold 18,209 Macans of all powertrain types, but only 8,079 of them were EVs. The Stuttgart crew already knows it made a mistake killing off one of its most popular models, and has greenlit a new combustion Macan it never expected to make, but it’s going to be 2028 before its available.

Maserati Needs To Capitalize On Porsche’s Mistake

That presents Maserati – presuming parent company Stellantis doesn’t decide to cut its losses – with a small opportunity to pick up sales for the Grecale, which is still available in both ICE and EV form.

The camouflage on the nose of both the white combustion prototype and gray Folgore EV (above) suggests we can expect some very mild front-end changes, and it looks like the lower bumper shape has changed. We can’t see any tweaks to the headlights or anything at the undisguised rear, but we might see some mods on later prototypes as we closer to the launch.

One shot showing the interior tells us Maserati hasn’t got any big updates planned for the dashboard, whose upper navigation screen and lower climate one are separated by a bank of transmission buttons. We’ve tried the current Grecale and came away impressed with the handling balance and quality, but less enamoured with the lack of physical switches, brake pedal feel and four-cylinder engine noise.

Grecale Already Updated For 2026

We don’t know yet what Maserati has planned under the hood of the facelifted cars, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see improvements to the Folgore’s 550 hp (558 PS / 410 kW) power output. The 275 mile (443 km) EPA range stats could also be bumped though they were already upped by 30 miles (48 km) for 2026 thanks to a new all-wheel drive disconnect function.

Also for 2026 Maserati junked the unloved 2.0-liter four-cylinder from entry-level and mid-spec US-market cars, replacing them with a version of the brand’s 3.0-liter twin-turbo Nettuno V6 making 385 hp (390 PS). The Trofeo halo model has a 523 hp (530 PS) take on the same powertrain.

The Macan’s absence isn’t going to dramatically change Maserati’s fortunes, but if the brand really is to survive it needs to leverage the hell out of the advantage Porsche has given it.

SH Proshots

China’s EV scene isn’t short on low, sleek SUVs, and here’s another one sliding into the mix. Called the Changan Nevo Q06, it lands in roughly the same size and shape territory as the Xiaomi SU7, though this one looks set to come in at a lower price point, with less emphasis on outright performance.

Images published by China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) show the SUV shares obvious design similarities to the Nevo A06 sedan. With that in mind, it has a pair of split headlights with a full-width light bar, in addition to a black lower grille section and black air intakes.

Read: The Funky Changan Qiyuan E07 Is Part SUV, Part Truck, And All Electric

Changan has also equipped it with gloss black wheel arches, a roof-mounted LiDAR, and door handles sitting flush with the bodywork. The side profile looks particularly sleek, especially thanks to the flowing shoulder line and bulging rear quarter panels. Found at the rear is a light bar and a color-matched diffuser.

Early details also reveal the Nevo Q06 will come with 14 different wheel designs, a two-tone rear spoiler, optional privacy glass, and a panoramic glass door. The SUV is 4,837 mm (190.4 inches) long, 1,970 mm (77.5 inches) wide, and stands 1,670 mm (65.7 inches) tall with a 2,940 mm (115.7-inch) wheelbase.

A Powertrain For Everyone

Unlike the YU7, which is sold exclusively as an EV, the Nevo Q06 will offer all-electric and range-extender powertrains. Two rear-driven electric models will be available, delivering 282 hp and 302 hp, respectively. Those seeking additional power can opt for a 444 hp dual-motor model that raises the top speed from 200 km/h (124 mph) to 230 km/h (143 mph).

There’s no word on the capacity of the available battery packs, but we know they will be LFP batteries sourced through Changan’s partnership with CATL.

Changan will also sell the Nevo Q06 as a range extender. This model will use a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine producing 97 hp, already used by several Deepal models, alongside a pair of electric motors at the rear axle. Details of the battery aren’t known, but it may get an innovative sodium-ion pack like the A06 sedan.

Tesla’s controversial Full Self-Driving system has received the green light for use in the Netherlands, and this could just be the start of its expansion across Europe. The decision comes after more than 18 months of tests and analysis by the RDW, the Dutch vehicle authority.

The most recent version of Tesla’s supervised FSD system “makes a positive contribution to road safety,” the RDW said. Now that it has the agency’s approval, Tesla says it will soon start rolling out the technology across the Netherlands, allowing owners to experience hands-free driving in both urban and highway settings.

Read: Feds Expand Tesla FSD Investigation After Visibility Failures

Even more important than the system’s approval for use in the Netherlands is that the RDW’s approval means it can be introduced across all European Union member states at a later date.

Before this happens, however, RDW must submit the application for authentication across the entire region, and all member states must vote on it. A majority vote is needed for the system to be approved EU-wide, and even if a majority is not achieved, individual countries can still decide to approve the system, Reuters notes.

Tackling The Country’s Most Difficult Roads

Smooth https://t.co/zJdymUNkcm

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 12, 2026

Since the approval, Tesla has flooded its X account with videos of the FSD Supervised system being tested in the Netherlands. Importantly, the RDW noted that “a vehicle with FSD Supervised is not self-driving,” pointing out that “the driver remains responsible and must always maintain control.”

“The Tesla driver assistance system supports the driver more than other systems because it takes over multiple driving tasks when it is switched on,” the agency said in a statement. It added that “due to the continuous strict monitoring of the driver in the vehicle, the system is safer than other driver assistance systems,” noting it was tested both on test tracks and on public roads.

If a driver is consistently found to be not fully alert while behind the wheel, the system will trigger various signals to catch their attention. In extreme cases, the system can shut down and temporarily be prevented from switching back on.

Passed the 🇳🇱 wife test @aelluswamy ! pic.twitter.com/zpZqTR1DkD

— Sander Smit (@Sandersmit83) April 12, 2026

This may look just like a base-level Ford Explorer EV, but thanks to some modifications, the all-electric SUV is now considered a commercial vehicle in Europe and has been rebadged the Explorer Van. While it may look like an undercover police car in America, it’s designed to carry things around, just like a Transit, albeit on a much smaller scale.

What starts out as a regular Explorer EV has been modified by Ford Pro’s Dagenham Conversion Centre in the UK and has been equipped with a permanent bulkhead behind the front seats, meaning it’s now considered a commercial vehicle rather than a passenger car. This offers purchasers important tax advantages and could prove popular among fleet buyers.

Read: Ford’s Electric Explorer Fixes Two Of Its Biggest Early Weaknesses

Beyond the inclusion of a new bulkhead, the Ford Explorer Van features a flat floor to maximize storage capacity, with several hooks and adjustable dividers. Those seeking even more practicality can order the EV with a Utility Pack, adding frunk storage, a roof rack, seat covers, and rear window mesh.

Ford also offers the stripped-down Explorer Van with a Commercial Pack that includes an amber lightbar, a tailgate work camp, and tailgate beacons, as well as a Welfare Pack with a fire aid kit and an eye washing and hand sanitizer station.

Without a doubt, the most intriguing element of the EV is the simple, blacked-out steel wheels with bright yellow lug nuts. Add some blue and red lights and upgraded bumpers, and you’d have the perfect undercover SUV.

Two different powertrains are on offer. The base model is equipped with a rear-mounted electric motor delivering 282 hp and capable of towing up to 2,204 lbs (1,000 kg). An all-wheel drive version is also offered, complete with 335 hp and an improved 2,645 lbs (1,200 kg) towing rating. The rear-motor version can drive up to 374 miles (602 km) on a single charge, but no range figure has been announced for the dual-motor version just yet.

This may look just like a base-level Ford Explorer EV, but thanks to some modifications, the all-electric SUV is now considered a commercial vehicle in Europe and has been rebadged the Explorer Van. While it may look like an undercover police car in America, it’s designed to carry things around, just like a Transit, albeit on a much smaller scale.

What starts out as a regular Explorer EV has been modified by Ford Pro’s Dagenham Conversion Centre in the UK and has been equipped with a permanent bulkhead behind the front seats, meaning it’s now considered a commercial vehicle rather than a passenger car. This offers purchasers important tax advantages and could prove popular among fleet buyers.

Read: Ford’s Electric Explorer Fixes Two Of Its Biggest Early Weaknesses

Beyond the inclusion of a new bulkhead, the Ford Explorer Van features a flat floor to maximize storage capacity, with several hooks and adjustable dividers. Those seeking even more practicality can order the EV with a Utility Pack, adding frunk storage, a roof rack, seat covers, and rear window mesh.

Ford also offers the stripped-down Explorer Van with a Commercial Pack that includes an amber lightbar, a tailgate work camp, and tailgate beacons, as well as a Welfare Pack with a fire aid kit and an eye washing and hand sanitizer station. Without a doubt, the most intriguing element of the EV is the simple, blacked-out steel wheels with bright yellow lug nuts. Add some blue and red lights and upgraded bumpers, and you’d have the perfect undercover SUV.

Two different powertrains are on offer. The base model is equipped with a rear-mounted electric motor delivering 282 hp and capable of towing up to 2,204 lbs (1,000 kg). An all-wheel drive version is also offered, complete with 335 hp and an improved 2,645 lbs (1,200 kg) towing rating. The rear-motor version can drive up to 374 miles (602 km) on a single charge, but no range figure has been announced for the dual-motor version just yet.

If you want a new car that spends more time on your driveway than at the dealer, Consumer Reports has some familiar advice. Stick with the usual suspects, be suspicious of shiny new tech, and maybe don’t volunteer to beta test an automaker’s latest big idea.

At the top of the pile, Toyota grabbed first place with Subaru second and Lexus third. Honda and BMW rounded out the top five. Consumer Reports based the study on survey data covering about 380,000 vehicles, so this is the kind of league table that has credibility, and isn’t just the result of an angry guy yelling into a forum thread about his rogue SUV.

Related: A CX-90 Owner Returned His New SUV After One Day, Bought Another, And Got The Same Problem

If you’re wondering who had the best transformation, that would be Tesla. It jumped eight places from last year’s study to ninth overall, helped largely by stronger showings from the Model 3 and, in particular, the Model Y. That doesn’t mean everything in Tesla land is suddenly flawless, because the Cybertruck still landed below average, but it does suggest the company is finally getting a better grip on some of the fit, finish, and hardware gremlins that used to follow it around.

Mazda’s PHEV Nightmare

The brand that took the awkward tumble was Mazda, which dropped eight spots to 14th. Older Mazda models still did reasonably well, but the newer, more complicated CX-70 and CX-90, especially in plug-in hybrid form, apparently kept causing trouble.

That’s a classic case of what happens when an automaker gets ambitious with new platforms, new drivetrains, and new tech all at once. Sometimes the engineering team nails it. Sometimes the owners become unwitting, unpaid members of the R&D squad.

Consumer Reports also says hybrids continue to be a safe option for ICE fans looking for better economy. EVs and PHEVs, meanwhile, remain overrepresented among the least reliable models in the survey, especially when they’re brand new or heavily redesigned.

Buick Leads Detroit Brands

There were a few other eyebrow raisers in the rankings. Buick was the highest placed traditional Big Three Detroit brand at eighth, Ford landed 11th, and relative newcomer Rivian brought up the rear, though it’s worth pointing out that Jaguar, Land Rover, Fiat, Alfa Romeo and more were excluded from the study due to a lack of data.

Consumer Reports also found Asian brands still dominate on reliability, Europeans sit in the middle, and domestic brands trail overall, even if Tesla’s jump gave Team America something to celebrate. 

And reliability is worth celebrating. No, it’s never going to be sexy, but unless your idea of excitement includes hanging around in waiting rooms and constantly swapping into loaner crossovers, Consumer Reports has a pretty clear message: maybe let somebody else test the cutting edge first.

Consumer Reports Reliability Study

Consumer Reports

In an era where cars are less mechanical than they are tech showpieces on wheels, your car is becoming more akin to your phone in terms of how its lifecycle is updated. Modern vehicles are packed with screens and features, all governed by software, software that can be updated, refined, and patched with relative ease. According to one report, there’s a company that understands that better than any others.

That company is none other than BYD, the Chinese New Energy Vehicle specialist that continues to make headlines, both good and bad. In this instance, the firm is employing over-the-air (OTA) software updates to increase vehicle performance and the life cycle of its models.

See Also: China Does What Many Drivers Wish Someone Would Do About Car Screens

In mid-February, BYD released the fourth OTA update to its Han L sedan, a flagship vehicle of the Dynasty family, which was first unveiled in April 2025. The upgrade will introduce an enhanced driver assistance system, which is end-to-end AI-driven to improve its perception and decision-making in complex driving scenarios.

The new features will take about two hours to install, and owners will be in a position to utilize the new features without going to an automobile dealership.

Chinese Lead In OTA Updates

Chinese manufacturers, such as BYD, seem to be leading in the OTA update sphere. While the concept may have been pioneered by brands such as Tesla, the evidence would suggest that Western manufacturers are lagging.

In the past, vehicles would receive only minor changes, often via facelifts and perhaps even several years after being introduced. OTA technology has broken this pattern and enabled the cycle of continuous improvements to keep vehicles updated throughout their lifetime in a similar manner as smartphones.

BYD leads this change with its active strategy of updates. In 2025, Nikkei Asia reports that the company released about 200 software updates on its Ocean and Dynasty brands. Other brands like Aito, a creation of Huawei Technologies and Seres Group, and startups like Leapmotor have become more prolific when it comes to OTA updates. Tesla, by comparison, only had 16 OTA updates last year. Toyota and VW didn’t fair any better, with eight and five respectively.

Nissan, with its new N7 electric car, however, managed to push out its first update just two months after its launch, unlocking new applications and longer voice recognition capabilities. “OTA updates must be developed even before product launch as part of the car’s lifecycle, in order to keep up,” said Isao Sekiguchi, managing director of Dongfeng Nissan.

There is a catch. The N7 is not a clean-sheet Nissan effort, but a joint project with Dongfeng Motor Corporation, built on the Chinese partner’s eπ 007 platform.

Less Opportunities To Monetize Updates

BYD’s rapid rate may be explained by the vertical integration development model, i.e. in-house design of semiconductors, operating systems, and hardware, designed by BYD. Such control allows the company to update it at a very high speed and efficiently without modifying the user experience.

However, OTA updates have an economic cost. It’s not just the cost incurred in developing and rolling out each update. While the extension of technological relevance of a vehicle may enhance the resale values and decrease the occurrence of complete model redesigns, OTA technology is difficult to commercialize.

In China, updates are generally free of charge, which rules out the opportunity to add to a company’s bottom line. Instead, Tesla-like subscription-based solutions are being considered by the industry. XPeng is mulling over more advanced levels of autonomous driving, particularly Level 4 technology, which could be marketed as an extra service. This would mirror the strategy Tesla already used with its Full Self-Driving subscription in North America.

Here’s some good news if you’ve been eyeing an EV as a way out of buying expensive gas, but also flinching at the price of making the switch. The gap between electric and gas cars just shrank to its smallest level ever. Okay, so $5,800 is not pocket change, but it’s a whole lot less scary than it used to be, and is the kind of difference you could even out with fuel cost savings if you’re a high mileage driver.

New EV prices dropped 2.8 percent year over year to $54,508, marking their third straight monthly decline, according to fresh data from Cox Automotive’s Kelley Blue Book. That’s not happening by accident, either. Automakers are throwing incentives at buyers like confetti, with EV discounts now averaging 14.6 percent of transaction price.

Related: Most Automakers Clear Inventory With Discounts, Tesla Raised Model S And X Prices Instead

Meanwhile, gas and hybrid vehicles are holding steady. The industry average transaction (ATP) price landed at $49,275 in March, up 3.5 percent from last year but basically flat compared with February. So while EVs are coming down, ICE models aren’t exactly rushing to meet them halfway.

The annual price gains have now accelerated for four consecutive months. The average MSRP reached $51,456, marking the 12th straight month above $50,000.

New-Vehicle Average Transaction Price

Bigger Is Better

What’s really driving the overall numbers, though, is what Americans are actually buying. Spoiler alert, it’s still big stuff, and its not electric. Full-size pickups are hovering near $66,000, while full-size SUVs are knocking on the door of $80,000. 

At the other end of the spectrum, compact cars are barely moving, up just 1.1 percent year over year and still sitting under $28,000. Even with rising prices, they’re losing relevance as buyers keep chasing space, power, and presence.

The brand data adds another layer of intrigue. Porsche buyers clearly didn’t get the memo about tightening American household budgets, with average prices jumping 12.4 percent year over year to $128,447. Cadillac is also riding high with an 11.6 percent increase to $84,139. 

Mercedes, Tesla Prices Down

But not everyone’s winning. Mercedes-Benz prices fell 3.4 percent to $75,886, while Tesla dropped 2.6 percent to $53,142, continuing its quiet price-cut campaign to stay competitive. 

And then there are incentives across the wider market. They climbed to 7.2 percent of ATP, up from 6.9 percent in February, showing that even as prices stay high, automakers are working harder behind the scenes to keep buyers interested.

Average Transaction Price By Automaker

Average Transaction Price By Brand

Average Transaction Price By Segment

Cox Automotive/KBB, Images Hyundai/Porsche

BYD has officially confirmed that its absurdly powerful new charging tech is headed to Europe, which means the phrase “rapid charger” may soon need a slightly more ambitious definition. Across the next 12 months, the company plans 6,000 Flash Charging stations outside China, including 3,000 across Europe.

Europe already has thousands of EV fill-up stations, but these BYD Flash Charge devices don’t just edge past today’s fastest public chargers, they absolutely body-slam them. BYD says the new hardware can deliver up to 1,500 kW, making it comfortably the quickest charging setup announced for Europe so far.

Related: Geely’s Golden Brick Battery Charges Faster Than BYD, But Good Luck Finding A Plug For It

Better yet, this won’t be some members-only club for BYD owners. The chargers are set to use CCS2 connectors and should be open to other brands too. Dealers selling BYD’s posh Denza vehicles will get their own branded versions, while public sites elsewhere will simply wear the Flash name. BYD is also planning to work with existing charging locations rather than starting from scratch every time.

The headline numbers are predictably bonkers. BYD says its newest battery tech can take compatible cars from 10 to 70 percent in five minutes, and from 10 to 97 percent in nine. That’s less charging stop, and more pause for breath.

Denza Leads The Charge

The first big beneficiaries in Europe will be the Denza Z9GT and the D9 DM-i. The Z9GT is the flashy one, a tri-motor, fully-electric shooting brake with a 123 kWh battery and enough shove to hit 62 mph in 2.7 seconds.

The D9 DM-i minivan, meanwhile, proves plug-in hybrids can join the party too. Its 58.5 kWh battery can accept up to 559 kW, allowing the same five-minute run from 10 to 70 percent and nine minutes from 10 to 97. That’s especially handy in a giant seven-seat MPV with 130 miles (209 km) of electric range and a 590-mile (950 km) total figure when the petrol tank is full. In contrast, some PHEVs from other brands still don’t accept DC charging at all.

Of course, BYD isn’t the only one throwing elbows. Earlier this week, Geely claimed its latest chargers and Golden Brick battery tech were even quicker still, because apparently the industry has decided the best way to sell EVs is through stopwatch violence.

BMW Says Non To Charging War

BMW, though, isn’t buying the hype. “You always have to be careful with those kinds of announcements,” the company’s battery production boss Markus Fallböhmer told Car Sales recently, suggesting battery longevity and reliability could be at stake.

“It is possible to optimize one single performance indicator, but you have to make compromises on other sides. We could also increase our charging speed, but then you have to reduce other important factors of a battery.”

BYD